Sorry, I dont understand. Are you trying to tell me some photo term? or are you trying to tell me I am barking up the wrong tree?
(Being at one time in the darkroom for days at a time - for years - I think I am quite quallified to know that anything white reflects, and that would fog anything you were trying to "dodge"..)
@circleOFconfusion I can see how using "negative" in a post about photography could be confusing, but I'm talking about the language term "double negative" here. "why isn't the dodger not black" is a double negative, when made a "positive" (kinda like a photo) it becomes "why is the dodger black?". I don't think that's what you meant to ask.
no offense intended to this dude, but in what way is this advanced? split filtration this is not.
Yarbols 1 year ago
why isnt the dodger not BLACK?????
circleOFconfusion 1 year ago
@circleOFconfusion Double negative for double the failure points.
Wikigoogtube 10 months ago
@Wikigoogtube
Sorry, I dont understand. Are you trying to tell me some photo term? or are you trying to tell me I am barking up the wrong tree?
(Being at one time in the darkroom for days at a time - for years - I think I am quite quallified to know that anything white reflects, and that would fog anything you were trying to "dodge"..)
Please expand. Thanks :o)
circleOFconfusion 10 months ago
@circleOFconfusion I can see how using "negative" in a post about photography could be confusing, but I'm talking about the language term "double negative" here. "why isn't the dodger not black" is a double negative, when made a "positive" (kinda like a photo) it becomes "why is the dodger black?". I don't think that's what you meant to ask.
Wikigoogtube 10 months ago
@Wikigoogtube
A beer moment.. my bad
Should have read: "Why isn't the dodger black?"
circleOFconfusion 9 months ago