Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)
Link to this comment:
Share to:
Loading...
- Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
or sign in to load a different list.
Loading...Saving...
I've read that the dating of the shround is far too young to be of Jesus, but rather it is the image of one of the Knights Templar.
hunternieuport 1 year ago
and YOU need to do your homework. what does scripture say? that Jesus was wrapped in linen but on his face was a NAPKIN. also his "visage was marred more than any man" meaning he was unrecognizable. and that the beard was torn from his face. finally NO ONE knows what Jesus looked like as no one did a portrait of him when he was on earth. the image you see today was done by a catholic monk CENTURIES after he left and returned to heaven...those are just a few of the evidences against the shroud
ztztzyzy 1 year ago
@ztztzyzy Name the Catholic monk.
Smarigdine 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
God, Our Lord and King Jesus Christ let bless You!!!
It`s the TRUE and everyone should compare that 3d picture(Manoppello) to the 2d. shroud of Turin to be sure not some fictional models!!!
Poor face of God beaten to death for our sins!
How people can say they don`t love Him-they dont have heart?
JezusSlave 1 year ago
Leonard sounds like his batteries are going flat
Vasdefrens1 2 years ago
lol fraud
cuntoxbubblecott 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I hate Christianity.
That being said, I have to say that due to the crucifixion marks and the slashes on the back (which are consistent with 1st Century Roman torture) I have to say that either it's the burial shroud of Jesus Christ or a forgery created by a medical genius who was hundreds of years before his time.
LAMetalhead 3 years ago
About 10 years ago it was found to be a fraud. I wipe my ass with it.
MrKevMan 3 years ago
you need to do your homework.
Los Alamos Labs has recently confirmed that the Carbon Dating which supposedly proved the shroud was a fake, was INVALID.
The sample used for the dating came from a portion of the shroud which was expertly rewoven in medieval times in order to repair it.
Newer cotton threads were interwoven with the old linen.
The C-14 dating accurately tested a piece of the shroud that was not representative of the main body of the cloth.
condorito29 3 years ago 3
@condorito29 yep you are 100% correct. I have seen several Docos on this very issue. It was a "Right Royal" botch job, but at least the truth has come out.
starquant 1 year ago
@condorito29 YOu are absolutely correct! The very person who led the original investigation has now confirmed that they DEFINITELY tested a 're-weave' And to the people who said, 'the Catholic Church won't allow it' need to do a little more homework-they've allowed it twice
beatledude 2 months ago