Added: 4 years ago
From: englandsonemanarmy
Views: 63,543
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (73)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Stick to batting Marcus

  • Fantastic delivery!!! Late swing!!!

  • Haha utter filth and he got a wicket. Gravy.

  • Are you guys serious, bodyline? underarm bowling? Who give a fuck. All past and who cares.

    So the English won, congrats to them. It's about time they stopped getting thrashed at all the games they invented.

    I thought this video was about the Trescothick wicket, not just another boring, generic Australian-English hate session.

  • Heck forget about his batting, england have needed his bowling last few years!!

  • got a bit of outswing

  • I love how the Aussies call us whinging poms yet they still moan about a series 80 years ago.

  • @limey157 some have got more

  • He could bowl a bit at the time, one of Somerset coach Dermot Reeve's more obscure coaching experiments was to try to turn Marcus into an all rounder. Surprised this was his only wicket at test level tho

  • How low key was this game :P

  • What was the point of this?

  • Bit of swing there for him. Not a fool with the ball.

  • good ball

  • almost 75 mph, must have bowled a fair bit when he was younger to be able to reach that pace without being a bowler or even an all rounder

  • nice outswing

  • He had Inzamam Ul-Haq plumb lbw next ball as well. Unfortunately, Steve Bucknor didn't give it and Inzy scored a century.

  • I think he had a wicket of a no ball in the 2004 tour of West Indies.

  • He had a wicket in the champions trophy final too.:)

  • his action is like warne

  • SWING!!

  • it was a bit loose but he did get good swing on it!

  • Its not amazing, for stats Trescothick has alredy taken FIRST-CLASS HAT-TRICK! I know i sound stupid but its true. His a good bowler,but his got a funny action!

  • lol it was a crappy ball!

  • Trescothick is sadly missed, especially for his bowling.

  • that swung loads considering he isn't a full time bowler!

  • i remember watching this live.. they brought trescothic in especially for this and he did it in his first over.. i was so pissed off at imran nazir

  • man swung a long way man thats cool for a part time bowler or should i say not a bowler at all but a bowler now lol

  • SWING!

  • Thats an appalling ball as well lol

  • Englandsonemanarmy I love the music you have for this cricket scene!

  • they sometimes say shit gets wickets but he was a gun batsmen.

  • has he only got 1 wicket ever!

  • thats a shocker of a delivery aswell lol

  • He would have had another one against West Indies a few years back but he no balled it, but he did get at least one ODI wicket.

  • bit of swing there from trescothick!!!

  • What an absolute bollocks comment, tressa is a legend and what gives you the right to knock him. Stress related illnesses can be really serious so shut up if you know whats good for you.

  • Lmfao, ha I got something else you suck on dickhead.

  • dude

    just please be quite

    your embrassing yourself

  • what the fuck.. its just a fucking excuse... for losers.. like you

  • u are a sick person i am mates with him and hes a great man and has loads of bottle and is one of the best around

  • You've got that right. He was an under-appreciated player, and his absence post-2005 has been arguably the biggest factor in England's dip in fortunes - as well as the fab four not being fit and firing.

    The impetus he gave England's innings in the 2005 Ashes was a huge part of England's success. He's arguably England's greatest ever ODI batsman too.

    Always loved watching him play. Sad that we won't see him on the international stage again.

  • Well, England did beat Aus fair and square in 05, mate. Beat 'em fair and square with pretty much a second XI in the Comm Bank series in 06/07 too.

    As for blatant cheating - he's sucking a lolly to keep the saliva going. Mark Taylor was incessantly chewing on gum to achieve the same thing.

    As for Bodyline, which country was it that brought us the underarm delivery?

    Get a life, dude.

  • @mymentor stick with the times blame the person or the team, not the nation (eg Jardine and England, G Chappell and Aus)

  • @mymentor Mmm, yes, because the underarm delivery was aimed at an unprotected batters head and injured people.

    Totally a fair comparison.

  • @Kezza237

    In terms of 'sportsmanship', which I was replying to, yes, it was.

    And Bodyline was no more dangerous than the Windies 80s bouncer barrage, or the intimidation Lillee and Thompson inflicted on the English in '74. Part of the game.

  • @mymentor I never said bodyline was any different to those, I'm just saying its a stupid comparison. It's way more unsportsmanlike. They bowled those balls with full intention to hurt the batsman. How is that better than a guy bowling an underarm ball?

    Also, it shouldn't be part of the game. It's less dangerous nowadays with the helmets, but back then head blows were very dangerous, and for any team to employ a strategy focusing on deliveries to the head sickens me.

  • @Kezza237

    "for any team to employ a strategy focusing on deliveries to the head sickens me"

    You should brush up on your history then, as fast leg theory (or Bodyline) quite simply didn't focus on 'deliveries to the head' at all. It focussed on deliveries bowled to the ribs and chest on the 'line of the body' with the aim of batsmen fending to a packed leg-side cordon.

    I'll agree it was bad for the game, although aesthetically rather than being in any way unsportsmanlike.

  • @mymentor We only won in Birmingham 2005 because the umpire gave kasprowich out when he wasn't with 3 runs to spare. We were very lucky to win that series.

  • @Buggaton

    Kasprowicz was out, and England deserved to win that test and that series. They played the better cricket for the longer periods.

    Australia were lucky to draw the 3rd test.

  • @mymentor I didn't say we didn't deserve to win. We did. But we also didn't deserve to lose a series to the West Indies a few years ago when they beat us 1-0 by drawing two tests 9 and 8 wickets down with 150+ runs to attain. We were still very lucky to because Kasprowicz should NOT have been given out. His hand was not on the bat when the ball struck it which means it is no longer considered an extension of the bat and being caught off it is not out. Look it up.

  • @Buggaton

    Mate, Kasprowicz took one hand off his bat after the ball had hit his glove - and besides, the glove the ball did hit remained on the bat. Either way, he was out, plain and simple.

    The only way it could have been considered not out would be if he removed a hand from the bat and the ball hit that hand's glove and was caught. That's not what happened, and the correct decision was made.

  • @mymentor @mymentor From the times article: "No One Spared A Thought For Kasprowicz At The Time"... he wasn't actually out, televised replays showing that the right-hand glove which the ball struck, and was caught by wicketkeeper Geraint Jones, was not on the bat handle." Unfortunately there isn't any good footage of this on YouTube and all the vids make it look as you described but I assure you, it wasn't.

  • @Buggaton

    I've got the (brilliant) DVD of that series. I've seen the match and the dismissal many times. It was out.

    I've played the game all my life, and come from a family whose religion is cricket. I know the game, and its rules, very well. Kaspro was out. End of story.

    He was also probably out lbw 50 runs earlier, which few people remember. Either way, it made for the more epic finish the way it ended.

  • @mymentor I also own that DVD XD It is a fantastic one. I love Mark Nicholas' commentary and wish he was involved with TMS. I do find your defiance of all forms of media alarming, however. There isn't an article in the world that says "he was out! The doubters are wrong!". His dismissal did save test cricket (probably).

  • hes quite quick for someone who never bowls

  • tresco=legend

  • imran nazir is a shit batsman... wat happened to marcus nowadayz/

  • imrans good he took pakistan to final and hes mych better than marcus

  • no hes not

  • marcus retired now and imrans banned from pak team, so they bad as each other

  • that was a superb piece of bowling. swing, accuracy, pace and seam movement shown by a spectacular delivery. i particularly enjoy his side-on action with a relaxed aproach allowing marcus to deliver the ball with control but with venom. he enticed the drive and nazir would never have been able to survive that ball, it would have got the greats of the game out (inc richards and tendulkar). im looking forward to seeing marcus' second test wicket. the greatest achievement in sporting history.

  • never forget ;_;

  • the ball swung rather alot!

  • Well bowled Tresco. Need you back soon for England.

  • got lucky

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more