thought this movie was about the evolution of conciseness. the monolith is the Iphone/machine that needs to be transcended so man can be reborn. David Bowman turns HAL off after the machine tries to kill him. Then he makes a jump in evolution.
Alan is projecting his paranoid view of reality on to this piece of art. i dont think there is any subjective reality that we can judge the NWO from.
Primitive people are every bit as religious as the rest of the world. Contrary to what he's saying here, they actually do seek medical and mental well being via their own sources like shaman etc...they have their own concepts of the spiritual, higher powers "god" etc...to hear Mr Watt imply that they don't need these things was surprising.
No human being is without a personal agenda, bias or angle. No human is infallible. Too many people simply find someone who seems right, without actually checking their accuracy. Don't let ANYONE think for you. Every "truth seeker" out there on the radio, documentaries, books has areas of weakness and blind spots. Some have truth mixed with error. We need to have wisdom to know the difference. I'd rather be wise than clever.
Actually the spaceship was going to Saturn, but Kubrick changed it to Jupiter because he couldn't get the rings to look realistic. I'm always a little wary of Watt, as he seems to see a conspiracy in everything, even the invention of the TV was to mind-control us.... You can give the elites too much power and omnipotence. They're only human beings, not gods. They certainly make plans and scheme, but they don't have control over as much as people think. Life isn't like that. Unpredictable
There's no "rip-off". IMO Alan Watt's an independent & very credible researcher. Of course, he learned a lot of whistleblowers like Bill Cooper, but Alan started waking up in very young years by spending his time in libraries studying old (uncensored) books while others were "chilling" around. He's very educated in ancient history, occult/esoteric knowledge and the conology used by them since ages.
More in our channel's playlist: ►tinyurl com/AlanWatt-videos
@absolutelyfree1963 I don't know much about Cooper, to be honest. I'm from the UK and, obviously he wasn't that big over here (we don't have a talk radio scene, apart from some establishment stations). I did see Cooper's 2001 review and found it quite interesting. I've since downloaded a load of his mp3s and a videoed lecture to watch. Sadly, all the British "truth-seekers" are nuts - Icke (former messiah and believer in reptilian alien shape shifters), Shayler (now a messianic transvestite)...
@BogusDonut Bill Ryan is a naive, new age, Scientologist, conned by a guy claiming to be a "fixer" for the elites with psychic powers sent to sort him out, but ended up liking him (appealing to his ego)... Tony Gosling seems okay though (so far).
Alan Watt is a very intelligent guy no doubt but he uses his intelligence to push christianity upon you which is just another tool for controlling people- no different from the masons- the flip side of the coin thats value is the same! There also seems to be this perspective that keeps humanity down- masons may push secularism too far but watts pushes for human helplessness that needs a god to fix everyrthing- as if were not capable of our own destiny without submission to christianity
@treflipmafia12 ok perhaps i overstated the christian angle- what i mean to say is theres alot of god vs devil(as if science is the devil) nonsense in some of his work that sounds rather old testament- such as this movie which he overanalyzes to the point of comedy-kubrick only dreams he could have been so articulate in representing ideas whether they be illuminati ones or not- its like a song- often the listener gives far more credit than what an artist intends or means or even cared about!
@treflipmafia12 You're totally right. He preaches what Zeitgeist does - H.P. Blavatsky origins of Christianity (channeled to her by an "ascended master"... But Watt goes on to say that religion was created (like TV) as a mind-control device. He thinks everything was created for that purpose.
Sorry, but this is total BS. Alan Watt is no "tool", he's an independent researcher w/o an agenda and he's no adversting guests on his shows as most of the other hosts. He only lives by selling his four books, two DVDs and his (old audio) MP3 CDs. 90 % on his excellent website is for free!! Alan gives YOU the tools to deprogram yourself from your conditioning/indoctrination and to study the ancient "art of conology".
@ausseratem thats your opinion and i have mine- most of my opinions are my own- not some indoctrination- i have not been indoctrinated by the churches or the television and no mr paranoid- im not an "operative"!!!!! Watts makes some good points and some that i find laughable- as is the case with most humans
@ausseratem Everyone has an agenda, every human being on the planet. It would be naive to think otherwise. I've seen no evidence that he's co-intel though. I just think a lot of what he teaches is wrong.
@salvadory Are you reading the same Alan Watt as I am? He seems to believe that religion is a mind-control device (like everything else), from what I've heard and read. Masons don't push secularism. You can't join if you're an atheist. I think your view of Christianity is rather skewed too.
@BogusDonut masons arent secular but thats what people claim they push - a satanic secularism- an ungodly secret agenda! all the anti-mason propaganda came from chrisitans- freemasons were sceintists and free thinkers whose ideas threatened the church- watt is anti science and he is saying the christian god is the true god in his own subdued way- i call bunk on that claim- i call bunk on all this secret planned agenda that 2001 is a brainwashing tool - watt is taking it way to seriously
@BogusDonut he may say religion is mind control yet he still pushes that behind the religion is the truth- if youre an athiest or agnostic or maybe have your own idea of god then you must be iluminati or masonic from what ive gathered from watt- im sorry but the religion is not only mind control but so is the biblical god in my opinion- i see nothing godly about the god in the bible or the koran etc- i see a god created by the hand of men- behind the intelligence is a man pushing his god on us
so should we all just head off to the amazon??? Although its good info that guys like alan watt give us but they never seem to have any answers about what to do. Ended up on this clip after watching ALAN WATTS (not to be confused) an really when it comes down to it we are all manifestations of god anyway. So enjoy the show. Conspiracy theory is like CNN.. Fear.. THe BIG Brother... We are all big brothers....
Gotta give thumps up, because even though the sound was terrible, and almost incoherent, at least there was no stupid music, like in most videos dealing with 2001:s meaning.
i don't think this is mr. watts best interpretation...interesting though.
i see the obeLisk as the ARTIFACT, as referred to in the gnostic scriptures...it is an EVOLVING computer. it EVOLVES us. the killing is symbolic of the story of cain and abeL. i don't see as much masonic/illumiNATi symbolism in this movie.
@eggsalad774 Actually it's a stele. It's referred as monolith to reveal it's true meaning, but it by definition isn't monolith, which is natural formation.
Obelisk is closer to truth than monolith, but not exactly.
alan watt is mind fucking all of you he tells the truth about freemason watchers illumanitti to grab your inturest thendenoucnes God saying Jesus never lived the savor of man and you eat it up like dogs eating your own vomit its a reverse mind trick to get you to think hes on are side but he speaks evil things y is he still alive they would have killed him off along time ago wake up people read your bible God does not want anything from you but you to love obey and worship him hes protecting you
And the fact that the Millennium Hilton Hotel represents the black monolith from 2001a space Odyssey. It is located right next to where the twin towers were. So don't blame the puppet government, blame those who control it. It was just another order out of chaos sacrifice ritual.
This guy doesn't seem to understand what the film is about. If he did, his personal theories might be more interesting. ex. `HAL' stands for Heuristic + ALgorithmic, not IBM.
ex. The slab is clearly not an obelisk.
William Cooper had much more interesting theories.
i didn't know that the slab is the obelisk in high freemasonry..serves me right for speed reading/ as per your suggestion i'm re-reading it (onto Vol III); just excused Alan for his 'slip' and corrected him in the eyes of CRAPCANNONS (who you've put right i see) but the mistake is mine..must be one of those things i've 'screened'. I'll pay closer attn this time round.
He wldn't thank you for calling him a 'guy'-the appellation was selected for it's close resemblance to 'gay': i won't explore that here but if you wish to reject this explanation, pls don't shoot from the hip in doing so
"Heuristic + ALgorithmic" is an arbitrary exoteric match made so that the esoteric acronymistic cap would fit. The slab is a monolith: Alan makes the occasional slip.
If you're at the level of Cooper, you have some way to go yet before you're ready for Watt. Keep digging!
Why do i need to STUDY "information theory & systems analysis?" I know what 'heuristic' means & what algorithms are.
kubrick was a high priest of the Holy Wood. As i say, there are the mundane, often dry EXOTERIC explanations, plausible to most because uttered with a straight face by serious, well respected 'industry insiders'. Then there are the ESOTERIC explanations for initiates of the Hidden Wisdom. This analysis also coheres with the 2 sequels & with films outside this mileau & genre
it's 'Dr.' Watt actually & i take umbrage at "reckless". His analysis is ANYTHING BUT "reckless". It's irresponsible, in fact it's 'reckless' and extremely ignorant of you to cast wild aspersions like that around. Alan Watt's a polymath, deeply learned in the high masonic tradition.
"whereof one knows nothing, thereof one must remain silent" LW. Go back to Mark Kermode et al if your sensibilities are more inclined to prefer the well articulated mundane over the pedestrianly spoken sacred
I am willing to bet that you yourself do not even understand the exoteric meaning of the film. Ex. Why does Dave Bowman live and Frank Poole die?
Understand the exoteric meaning is a prerequisite before launching into esoteric interpretations.
Unless, of course, all you have is esoteric interpretations, in which case RECKLESS misinterpretations of the film are inevitable. (yes I said it again, though in this case it would apply to you)
Ultimately Frank doesn't die. But for you to say knowing the exoteric is a "prerequisite" before "launching into esoteric interpretations" - not that i was "launching" into anything - doesn't make sense? LOL. Utter, utter drivel. You're just making it up as you go along aren't you?
I'm here because i'm interested in making sense of the world that i've found myself in and Alan Watt has helped me to do that like no one else. You're the dilettante
you fail to realize that exoteric meanings are fronts and not starting points but an ending point for masking the esoteric, but i would like to hear your crap theory why red water dies and bowman lives, dont worry about me referring frank poole to red water or blood its just a RECKLESS interpretation
first off, why the fuck are you being so fucking aggressive? what's the big problem with civilized disagreement?
fyfuckingi i find what alan watt says interesting. however a lot of his blind followers are not. if you do not know how to understand a film's basic story and plot you resign yourself to disappearing up each others asses with metatheories not anchored with what's on the screen.
i would have enjoyed a discussion. you would prefer an argument.
you don't understand the most basic story and plot choices made in the film. when you learn story structure and actually write a screenplay you might be entitled to an opinion. until then you're just another parasite.
though i don't doubt Watt's capacities, you, personally, don't know anything about story-structure, Kubrick, Clarke, or film symbolism.
so im `plugged into the matrix' because i understand the film and you don't. so be it.
there is actually nothing easier than understanding film symbolism and story structure, if you want to stay in second grade (plugged in) be my guest but i prefer you look into the Frankfurt School and Tavistock before you give credence to the act of being lame enough to write a screenplay for hollywood consumption. you should stick with wannabe artsy clones who save the aisle seats for ebert , later exoteric boy, remember art is artificial , and you DONT understand the film
nonetheless can i hear why bowman lives and poole dies so i can make fun of you more, and try not to make it sound like an 11th grade term paper, shoot for 12th grade at least
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
What a load of bullshit! great film much more profound than this mumbling no mark! Arhur C. Clarke a genius Alan Watt full of shit!! John Lennon a schill? lennon was shot!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
FEMA bone smash (1:57) or femur in your case, same bones used to make the X in the skull and bones logo, FE MA , Fe= Iron (periodic table) MA= mother , FEMA=The Iron Lady = The Statue of Liberty = Androgyny (check out her arms) = Androgynous Hermaphroditic Agenda by Alan Watt at cuttingthroughthematrix dot commercial , and theodore adorno wrote all the beatles songs and lennon knew he was a part of bullshit but then foolishly thought he could make a difference by promoting peace and was shot ...
and was shot when it was well known that he would reject any further knighthoods into the British Empire that his contributions to their agenda had so far deserved and would give reasons why if interviewed about it, mark david chapman was mind controlled and programmed from childhood to one day incur rath on a highly public figure he onced admired, welcome , dont mind me ........ just cutting through
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Total fucking bullshit! no proof eyewitnesses, sources, documents? Alan Watt is a most likely a schill a triple agent creating fear mongering and opposition so sheep like you go along with his view instead of your own! "CHECK OUT THE ARMS!" shes a sumarian hemaphrodite deity who will make our willies vanish into the 4th dimension! you sound like a 16 regurgetating schizo.
you mean thats not alan watts, it is no doubt alan watt, they are two different people, a relation is possible but unverifiable, i've already traveled the watts road and prefer the watt lectures instead, you'll have no trouble finding watts around here on youtube being that he was authorized to quack while watt is not authorized
Where was Alan Watts ?
Greg763 3 weeks ago
Part 1 in Bill Cooper's Mystery Babylon series explains 2001: A Space Odyssey
DMCx2MT 1 month ago
thought this movie was about the evolution of conciseness. the monolith is the Iphone/machine that needs to be transcended so man can be reborn. David Bowman turns HAL off after the machine tries to kill him. Then he makes a jump in evolution.
Alan is projecting his paranoid view of reality on to this piece of art. i dont think there is any subjective reality that we can judge the NWO from.
paddyrock666 3 months ago
Primitive people are every bit as religious as the rest of the world. Contrary to what he's saying here, they actually do seek medical and mental well being via their own sources like shaman etc...they have their own concepts of the spiritual, higher powers "god" etc...to hear Mr Watt imply that they don't need these things was surprising.
BornInTzyon 3 months ago
i like alan watt's work generally, but isn't this just blatant plagiarism from bill cooper?
SilverShamrock71 5 months ago
No human being is without a personal agenda, bias or angle. No human is infallible. Too many people simply find someone who seems right, without actually checking their accuracy. Don't let ANYONE think for you. Every "truth seeker" out there on the radio, documentaries, books has areas of weakness and blind spots. Some have truth mixed with error. We need to have wisdom to know the difference. I'd rather be wise than clever.
BogusDonut 6 months ago
Actually the spaceship was going to Saturn, but Kubrick changed it to Jupiter because he couldn't get the rings to look realistic. I'm always a little wary of Watt, as he seems to see a conspiracy in everything, even the invention of the TV was to mind-control us.... You can give the elites too much power and omnipotence. They're only human beings, not gods. They certainly make plans and scheme, but they don't have control over as much as people think. Life isn't like that. Unpredictable
BogusDonut 6 months ago
Damn! Again I ended up in a Watt video when looking for more Alan Watts!
Seems interesting enough, I'll watch.
elchafa 7 months ago
This is a direct rip-off from Bill Cooper...
absolutelyfree1963 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@absolutelyfree1963
There's no "rip-off". IMO Alan Watt's an independent & very credible researcher. Of course, he learned a lot of whistleblowers like Bill Cooper, but Alan started waking up in very young years by spending his time in libraries studying old (uncensored) books while others were "chilling" around. He's very educated in ancient history, occult/esoteric knowledge and the conology used by them since ages.
More in our channel's playlist: ►tinyurl com/AlanWatt-videos
ausseratem 7 months ago
@absolutelyfree1963 This has far less information than Bill Cooper.
BogusDonut 6 months ago
Comment removed
absolutelyfree1963 6 months ago
@absolutelyfree1963 I don't know much about Cooper, to be honest. I'm from the UK and, obviously he wasn't that big over here (we don't have a talk radio scene, apart from some establishment stations). I did see Cooper's 2001 review and found it quite interesting. I've since downloaded a load of his mp3s and a videoed lecture to watch. Sadly, all the British "truth-seekers" are nuts - Icke (former messiah and believer in reptilian alien shape shifters), Shayler (now a messianic transvestite)...
BogusDonut 6 months ago
@BogusDonut Bill Ryan is a naive, new age, Scientologist, conned by a guy claiming to be a "fixer" for the elites with psychic powers sent to sort him out, but ended up liking him (appealing to his ego)... Tony Gosling seems okay though (so far).
BogusDonut 6 months ago
Comment removed
absolutelyfree1963 6 months ago
@BogusDonut I would say I'm a British truth-seeker and I, good Sir, am not crazy.
benzie13 5 months ago
@benzie13 As am I. That wasn't what I was saying. I meant why are all the high-profile British truth-seekers all nuts or liars?
BogusDonut 5 months ago
Alan Watt is a very intelligent guy no doubt but he uses his intelligence to push christianity upon you which is just another tool for controlling people- no different from the masons- the flip side of the coin thats value is the same! There also seems to be this perspective that keeps humanity down- masons may push secularism too far but watts pushes for human helplessness that needs a god to fix everyrthing- as if were not capable of our own destiny without submission to christianity
salvadory 1 year ago
@salvadory i dont feel he pushes Christianity at all, normally when referring to it he reveals how it all equates to astrology
treflipmafia12 10 months ago
@treflipmafia12 ok perhaps i overstated the christian angle- what i mean to say is theres alot of god vs devil(as if science is the devil) nonsense in some of his work that sounds rather old testament- such as this movie which he overanalyzes to the point of comedy-kubrick only dreams he could have been so articulate in representing ideas whether they be illuminati ones or not- its like a song- often the listener gives far more credit than what an artist intends or means or even cared about!
salvadory 10 months ago
@treflipmafia12 You're totally right. He preaches what Zeitgeist does - H.P. Blavatsky origins of Christianity (channeled to her by an "ascended master"... But Watt goes on to say that religion was created (like TV) as a mind-control device. He thinks everything was created for that purpose.
BogusDonut 6 months ago
@salvadory
Sorry, but this is total BS. Alan Watt is no "tool", he's an independent researcher w/o an agenda and he's no adversting guests on his shows as most of the other hosts. He only lives by selling his four books, two DVDs and his (old audio) MP3 CDs. 90 % on his excellent website is for free!! Alan gives YOU the tools to deprogram yourself from your conditioning/indoctrination and to study the ancient "art of conology".
Are you a tool (operative)?
ausseratem 7 months ago
@ausseratem thats your opinion and i have mine- most of my opinions are my own- not some indoctrination- i have not been indoctrinated by the churches or the television and no mr paranoid- im not an "operative"!!!!! Watts makes some good points and some that i find laughable- as is the case with most humans
salvadory 7 months ago
Comment removed
absolutelyfree1963 6 months ago
@ausseratem Everyone has an agenda, every human being on the planet. It would be naive to think otherwise. I've seen no evidence that he's co-intel though. I just think a lot of what he teaches is wrong.
BogusDonut 6 months ago
Comment removed
absolutelyfree1963 6 months ago
@salvadory Are you reading the same Alan Watt as I am? He seems to believe that religion is a mind-control device (like everything else), from what I've heard and read. Masons don't push secularism. You can't join if you're an atheist. I think your view of Christianity is rather skewed too.
BogusDonut 6 months ago
@BogusDonut masons arent secular but thats what people claim they push - a satanic secularism- an ungodly secret agenda! all the anti-mason propaganda came from chrisitans- freemasons were sceintists and free thinkers whose ideas threatened the church- watt is anti science and he is saying the christian god is the true god in his own subdued way- i call bunk on that claim- i call bunk on all this secret planned agenda that 2001 is a brainwashing tool - watt is taking it way to seriously
salvadory 6 months ago
@BogusDonut he may say religion is mind control yet he still pushes that behind the religion is the truth- if youre an athiest or agnostic or maybe have your own idea of god then you must be iluminati or masonic from what ive gathered from watt- im sorry but the religion is not only mind control but so is the biblical god in my opinion- i see nothing godly about the god in the bible or the koran etc- i see a god created by the hand of men- behind the intelligence is a man pushing his god on us
salvadory 6 months ago
2001 space odyssey was great and has more meaning than this, you can watch any movie and you would think you saw masonic symbolism
electronicmedium 1 year ago
Comment removed
absolutelyfree1963 6 months ago
IBM = I Beam?
No for anyone who's used IBMs old (60s-80s) operating systems it stands for
Incredibly Bad Machines. People have to be pretty dim to like them. It takes real jerks to make Bill Gates look good.
newbetterandhappy 1 year ago
@newbetterandhappy Why is a old Microsoft IBM program called HAL??? =/
lipoicacid 9 months ago
Comment removed
absolutelyfree1963 6 months ago
so should we all just head off to the amazon??? Although its good info that guys like alan watt give us but they never seem to have any answers about what to do. Ended up on this clip after watching ALAN WATTS (not to be confused) an really when it comes down to it we are all manifestations of god anyway. So enjoy the show. Conspiracy theory is like CNN.. Fear.. THe BIG Brother... We are all big brothers....
paddyrock666 1 year ago
Comment removed
absolutelyfree1963 6 months ago
sound please! Its been disabled or somtin.
mackac81 1 year ago
Comment removed
mackac81 1 year ago
Man i was watching this 2 days ago! lol never understood what that was all abt!!!
SuperMel1988 1 year ago
can someone please start proving things alan watt is saying are incorrect ! cos it all seems really fudging plausible to me
djatlus29 1 year ago
Gotta give thumps up, because even though the sound was terrible, and almost incoherent, at least there was no stupid music, like in most videos dealing with 2001:s meaning.
Retardretroguy 1 year ago
Who is Alan Watt?
MrChristian326 1 year ago
A message from CensorTube: «An error occured, please try again later.»
ausseratem 1 year ago
Our transcript for this video is still available but the short URL has been censored... You may try it via the parent site
ausseratem (dot) wordpress (dot) com / dokumente/
(no spaces etc.) or by using this new short URL:
is (dot) gd/c5A0Z
ausseratem 1 year ago 8
@ausseratem
Sorry folks, the link for the transcript has changed once more:
ausseratem(dot)wordpress(dot)com/?attachment_id=1375
or
is(dot)gd/g4Yjt
ausseratem 1 year ago
Comment removed
absolutelyfree1963 6 months ago
Fuck the elite bastards who think they have the right to rule over my life, they have no power over me.
Fight4Privacy 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Whoever is flagging all my comments below as "SPAM"... it isn't !!! So once more:
For a PDF transcript of this video see
t i n y u r l (dot) com/2001-decoded
(no spaces etc.; YouTube censors URLs)
ausseratem 1 year ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
Whoever flagged my comment below as "SPAM"... it isn't. So once more:
For a PDF transcript of this video go to
t i n y u r l (dot) com/2001-decoded
(no spaces etc.; YouTube censors URLs)
ausseratem 1 year ago 11
This has been flagged as spam show
PDF transcript for this video: t i n y u r l (dot) com/2001-decoded
ausseratem 1 year ago 12
i don't think this is mr. watts best interpretation...interesting though.
i see the obeLisk as the ARTIFACT, as referred to in the gnostic scriptures...it is an EVOLVING computer. it EVOLVES us. the killing is symbolic of the story of cain and abeL. i don't see as much masonic/illumiNATi symbolism in this movie.
perhaps, it has many potential 'takes'
tomcornhole 1 year ago
its not an obelisk its the monolith
eggsalad774 2 years ago
@eggsalad774 Actually it's a stele. It's referred as monolith to reveal it's true meaning, but it by definition isn't monolith, which is natural formation.
Obelisk is closer to truth than monolith, but not exactly.
Retardretroguy 1 year ago
cool vid. host comes across as a dink.
metalwizard13 2 years ago
courageously heroic and wise in my mind
camiller3754 2 years ago
The Roman Empire Fell and it was the World power at the time. So can the NEW World Order.
Easydollars 2 years ago 4
@Easydollars rome didn't fall it just shape shifted, empires never truly fall, they just get transferred or migrate
MrDko9873 3 months ago
are you sure its not up your ass
benebeer 3 years ago
maybe you have sticky traps in your ass but not me, later jesus-boy
ThEpErsOnLiGHts 3 years ago
damn right! Jesus Is King
benebeer 3 years ago
alan watt is mind fucking all of you he tells the truth about freemason watchers illumanitti to grab your inturest thendenoucnes God saying Jesus never lived the savor of man and you eat it up like dogs eating your own vomit its a reverse mind trick to get you to think hes on are side but he speaks evil things y is he still alive they would have killed him off along time ago wake up people read your bible God does not want anything from you but you to love obey and worship him hes protecting you
benebeer 3 years ago
we dont give a shit about that here
ThEpErsOnLiGHts 3 years ago
whos we you got a mouse in your pocket
benebeer 3 years ago
i have a mouse in my basement, but not for long , i left sticky traps out
ThEpErsOnLiGHts 3 years ago
Comment removed
absolutelyfree1963 6 months ago
I don't know if it's the guy's accent, the poor audio quality, or a combination of both, but I didn't understand anything he said.
RedIV 3 years ago
could be the accent , or maybe your dead
ThEpErsOnLiGHts 3 years ago
*checks pulse* mmm, nope. I'm still alive.
RedIV 3 years ago
And the fact that the Millennium Hilton Hotel represents the black monolith from 2001a space Odyssey. It is located right next to where the twin towers were. So don't blame the puppet government, blame those who control it. It was just another order out of chaos sacrifice ritual.
Mangravyonherface 3 years ago
The movie does have occult overtones, there's no denying that. The scene where the black monolith appears as a cap less pyramid gives it away.
Mangravyonherface 3 years ago
Mr. Watt is brilliant, I love him.
NoJusticeInThisWorld 3 years ago 2
This guy doesn't seem to understand what the film is about. If he did, his personal theories might be more interesting. ex. `HAL' stands for Heuristic + ALgorithmic, not IBM.
ex. The slab is clearly not an obelisk.
William Cooper had much more interesting theories.
Disappointing.
CRAPCANNONS 3 years ago
the slab is the UN building in NYC which is an obelisk , this isnt for everyone, enjoy wikipedia and voting
ThEpErsOnLiGHts 3 years ago
HAL stands for sun.
In high freemasonry the slab IS an obelisk.
The u.n. building, the perfect ashlar.
I have no interest in 'theories'.
Disappointed.
zealotnut 3 years ago 2
i didn't know that the slab is the obelisk in high freemasonry..serves me right for speed reading/ as per your suggestion i'm re-reading it (onto Vol III); just excused Alan for his 'slip' and corrected him in the eyes of CRAPCANNONS (who you've put right i see) but the mistake is mine..must be one of those things i've 'screened'. I'll pay closer attn this time round.
EmmaCharlotteStubbs 3 years ago
He wldn't thank you for calling him a 'guy'-the appellation was selected for it's close resemblance to 'gay': i won't explore that here but if you wish to reject this explanation, pls don't shoot from the hip in doing so
"Heuristic + ALgorithmic" is an arbitrary exoteric match made so that the esoteric acronymistic cap would fit. The slab is a monolith: Alan makes the occasional slip.
If you're at the level of Cooper, you have some way to go yet before you're ready for Watt. Keep digging!
EmmaCharlotteStubbs 3 years ago 4
""Heuristic + ALgorithmic" is an arbitrary exoteric match made so that the esoteric acronymistic cap would fit..."
Actually I'm quoting Kubrick from an interview.
If you study Information Theory and Systems Analysis you will understand.
CRAPCANNONS 3 years ago
Why do i need to STUDY "information theory & systems analysis?" I know what 'heuristic' means & what algorithms are.
kubrick was a high priest of the Holy Wood. As i say, there are the mundane, often dry EXOTERIC explanations, plausible to most because uttered with a straight face by serious, well respected 'industry insiders'. Then there are the ESOTERIC explanations for initiates of the Hidden Wisdom. This analysis also coheres with the 2 sequels & with films outside this mileau & genre
EmmaCharlotteStubbs 3 years ago
Ed* milieu
EmmaCharlotteStubbs 3 years ago
You are clearly far less interested in a discussion as much as being a grandiloquent pedant handing down dogma like a cult-member.
You belong in Scientology, not film criticism.
CRAPCANNONS 3 years ago
i make no apologies to you for being able to say precisely what i mean.
ironic that i was extolling the virtues of Alan's plainly spoken commentary over the 'grandiloquence' of critics like kermode.
Is this not a discussion? Yr closed-minded opening comment set the tone for it, did it not? ha ha ha
Alan Watt is an iconoclast. i can think of no one LESS like a cult leader. "if they still have the use the bathroom.."(AW).
And so once again, yr arrogance is outweighed by yr ignorance
EmmaCharlotteStubbs 3 years ago
Ok ok jeez you guys are touchy about dear Mr. Watt...
Kubrick films do tend to attract reckless misinterpretations.
That said, I'll keep listening.
CRAPCANNONS 3 years ago
it's 'Dr.' Watt actually & i take umbrage at "reckless". His analysis is ANYTHING BUT "reckless". It's irresponsible, in fact it's 'reckless' and extremely ignorant of you to cast wild aspersions like that around. Alan Watt's a polymath, deeply learned in the high masonic tradition.
"whereof one knows nothing, thereof one must remain silent" LW. Go back to Mark Kermode et al if your sensibilities are more inclined to prefer the well articulated mundane over the pedestrianly spoken sacred
EmmaCharlotteStubbs 3 years ago
Please, take umbrage.
I am willing to bet that you yourself do not even understand the exoteric meaning of the film. Ex. Why does Dave Bowman live and Frank Poole die?
Understand the exoteric meaning is a prerequisite before launching into esoteric interpretations.
Unless, of course, all you have is esoteric interpretations, in which case RECKLESS misinterpretations of the film are inevitable. (yes I said it again, though in this case it would apply to you)
CRAPCANNONS 3 years ago
Thankyou, but i already had taken umbrage.
Ultimately Frank doesn't die. But for you to say knowing the exoteric is a "prerequisite" before "launching into esoteric interpretations" - not that i was "launching" into anything - doesn't make sense? LOL. Utter, utter drivel. You're just making it up as you go along aren't you?
I'm here because i'm interested in making sense of the world that i've found myself in and Alan Watt has helped me to do that like no one else. You're the dilettante
EmmaCharlotteStubbs 3 years ago
you fail to realize that exoteric meanings are fronts and not starting points but an ending point for masking the esoteric, but i would like to hear your crap theory why red water dies and bowman lives, dont worry about me referring frank poole to red water or blood its just a RECKLESS interpretation
ThEpErsOnLiGHts 3 years ago
first off, why the fuck are you being so fucking aggressive? what's the big problem with civilized disagreement?
fyfuckingi i find what alan watt says interesting. however a lot of his blind followers are not. if you do not know how to understand a film's basic story and plot you resign yourself to disappearing up each others asses with metatheories not anchored with what's on the screen.
i would have enjoyed a discussion. you would prefer an argument.
so, on that note, fuck off.
CRAPCANNONS 3 years ago
your so plugged into the matrix, enjoy the microchip and being amused by films
ThEpErsOnLiGHts 3 years ago
listen you sad stupid cunt.
you don't understand the most basic story and plot choices made in the film. when you learn story structure and actually write a screenplay you might be entitled to an opinion. until then you're just another parasite.
though i don't doubt Watt's capacities, you, personally, don't know anything about story-structure, Kubrick, Clarke, or film symbolism.
so im `plugged into the matrix' because i understand the film and you don't. so be it.
again, fuck off.
CRAPCANNONS 3 years ago
there is actually nothing easier than understanding film symbolism and story structure, if you want to stay in second grade (plugged in) be my guest but i prefer you look into the Frankfurt School and Tavistock before you give credence to the act of being lame enough to write a screenplay for hollywood consumption. you should stick with wannabe artsy clones who save the aisle seats for ebert , later exoteric boy, remember art is artificial , and you DONT understand the film
ThEpErsOnLiGHts 3 years ago
nonetheless can i hear why bowman lives and poole dies so i can make fun of you more, and try not to make it sound like an 11th grade term paper, shoot for 12th grade at least
ThEpErsOnLiGHts 3 years ago
You will never know.
You are more entertaining disappearing up your own ass.
CRAPCANNONS 3 years ago
yawn, later exoteric boy
ThEpErsOnLiGHts 3 years ago
here let me throw you a bone, ?v=CiXR-pUrldw&feature=related , this channel is for herbs like you
ThEpErsOnLiGHts 3 years ago
mmm, I'd like to know :)
jmguitard 2 years ago
Poole doesn't 'die'. He is preserved in space, and is recovered in 3001.
zenowing 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What a load of bullshit! great film much more profound than this mumbling no mark! Arhur C. Clarke a genius Alan Watt full of shit!! John Lennon a schill? lennon was shot!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
sodiumwinter 3 years ago
FEMA bone smash (1:57) or femur in your case, same bones used to make the X in the skull and bones logo, FE MA , Fe= Iron (periodic table) MA= mother , FEMA=The Iron Lady = The Statue of Liberty = Androgyny (check out her arms) = Androgynous Hermaphroditic Agenda by Alan Watt at cuttingthroughthematrix dot commercial , and theodore adorno wrote all the beatles songs and lennon knew he was a part of bullshit but then foolishly thought he could make a difference by promoting peace and was shot ...
ThEpErsOnLiGHts 3 years ago
and was shot when it was well known that he would reject any further knighthoods into the British Empire that his contributions to their agenda had so far deserved and would give reasons why if interviewed about it, mark david chapman was mind controlled and programmed from childhood to one day incur rath on a highly public figure he onced admired, welcome , dont mind me ........ just cutting through
ThEpErsOnLiGHts 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Total fucking bullshit! no proof eyewitnesses, sources, documents? Alan Watt is a most likely a schill a triple agent creating fear mongering and opposition so sheep like you go along with his view instead of your own! "CHECK OUT THE ARMS!" shes a sumarian hemaphrodite deity who will make our willies vanish into the 4th dimension! you sound like a 16 regurgetating schizo.
sodiumwinter 3 years ago
later sodium, enjoy wikipedia-level knowledge
ThEpErsOnLiGHts 3 years ago
peerless commentator
skylarkio 3 years ago 10
Pardon, i made a mistake:
The multilingual website for the people of Europe is
AlanWattSentientSentinel [ d o t ] E U
(remove the spaces, YouTube censors URLs)
ausseratem 3 years ago 9
Thanks for uploading this, YouTube CENSORED (deleted) the "Reality Check Part 1" videos. You forgot to mention Alan's official websites:
CuttingThroughTheMatrix [ d o t ] c o m
AlanWattSentientSentinel [ d o t ] c o m
ausseratem 3 years ago 8
Thanks for posting this. Alan's analysis is spot on.
MDJarv 3 years ago 7
This comment has received too many negative votes show
THATS NOT ALAN WATT
angelspills11 3 years ago
you mean thats not alan watts, it is no doubt alan watt, they are two different people, a relation is possible but unverifiable, i've already traveled the watts road and prefer the watt lectures instead, you'll have no trouble finding watts around here on youtube being that he was authorized to quack while watt is not authorized
ThEpErsOnLiGHts 3 years ago