"Climate Mr. Davies is what we all have to put up with." LOVE IT GODDERS! I'm an environmental advocate but I am skeptic of governmental interference which tends to cater to corporations.
@ukipwebmaster Well for now the trend is to have stronger winters, because the air is warmer theres more humidity in the air causing stronger storms, even snow storms so for a while the tendency should lead to stronger winter storms for now.
Hilarious, your party actively promotes homeopathy and yet you have the nerve to call the scientific consensus flakey?! Every one of those points was pathetically easy to poke holes in, obviously a cold winter doesn't disprove a long term warming trend but of course any complex or deep arguments run counter to the oh-its-all-common-sense stop-being-so-poncey-its-all-so-simple arrogance of this pathetic little party, this is a party that celebrates ignorance and ridicules intelligence.
You exaggerate and at least try and spell homoeopathy right. What we say is that if people want to choose this it is up to them and not the business of the state. Just like global warming - if you want to believe this crap it's up to you but don't drag the world down with this con job.
@ukipwebmaster I spelt it the American way because that seems to be standard on youtube, my computer automatically spell-checks so it seems a petty point, similar in fact to the "you can tell I'm a sceptic because I don't dress like a scarecrow" line, a very mature way to counter an argument indeed. No party aims to ban homoeopathy, the fact that you mention it explicitly in your manifesto and not under a more general banner of 'alternative medicine' certainly suggests you do support it.
@ukipwebmaster "Blah blah blah" again a mature counter argument, there seems to be a pattern emerging here.. I think it's pretty laughable that your only proof of a lack of scientific consensus is a 2008 meeting of climate sceptics paid for by an American, deeply conservative think-tank! Google a few surveys, the vast majority of the scientific community in fields related to climate science and in that field agree on this matter and so does the majority of research. You're a conspiracy theorist.
@aqaspecification "You're a conspiracy theorist." - Simply not true. However you are just a theorist along with your fellow believers in the global warming religion.
@aqaspecification What about the emails hacked from the University of East Anglia? Do you suggest we believe Al Gore and David Rothschild, this climate crap was originally spouted at a CFR meeting in the 1970's to get every human being paying a tax into this ponzi scheme. Why dont you check this out!
@aqaspecification...there are as many scientist out there who debunk the idea of global warming as there are that try to confirm it...you believe what you want, all i know is that nearly every goverment around the world are raking in a whole lot of extra taxes through their global warming policies...i know which theory i believe in
@ukipwebmaster As for your suggestion that by taking decisive action on an issue based on information which is the scientific consensus the government is somehow overstepping its bounds, well clearly that is ridiculous, the data issues Godfrey mentioned are complicated issues and whichever side you're on certainly more complicated than the simple misdirection he seems to suggest and regardless of them the scientific consensus is still against the sceptics.
@ukipwebmaster By all means argue about policy and how to tackle the issue but when you take a subject that has been scrutinised immensely by the scientific community and then have the obscene arrogance to assume that you, as a non-expert are right and they wrong because of some flawed argument (a cold winter, I mean really?) and make your case in such a nauseatingly self-satisfied and rude way then clearly you have demonstrated that you lack the maturity to be a part of any parliament EU or UK.
@aqaspecification I'm not a politician - I simply post videos. The 'scientific community' is not speaking with one voice on this - look up the Manhattan declaration. The 'experts' that push the global warming agenda from Al Gore downwards have a vested interest in keeping this scam going. The only thing 'green' about this is the dollars they earn and the gullibility of people like you.
The attitude of warmists when confronted with the fact that AGW data was faked is "So what?" The 'research' is apparently merely a means to an end---window dressing to sell otherwise intolerable policies to a reluctant world.
bravo! I agree, HAARP and other weather/climate agencies manipulate the atmosphere. Its obvious at this point, they tell us to recycle and then launch rockets that emit insane amounts of fossil fuel that affects the weather..not to mention chem trails and mass pollution. This video is real that dude bloom hit it on the head. PEACE -Vendetta KIngz
@MrHenryscat how is it a conspiracy to scrap the gold standard? I think we really need a gold standard, but do you mean that its just for taking the attention away from the economy? or how do you figure?
I think he has a good point, but it's badly made. UKIP have worked hard to present themselves as a professional organisation capable of holding senior office - PLEASE be careful not to turn people against you by sinking to their level & making personal comments about other member's clothing choices.
That Topic, They Could Be USing That To Control Our Weather To Get All Of Us Scared So We Buy Green Products And Pay The Carbon Tax Or Worse Kill Us Off Like We've Heard People In The News Talk About The Local News Even.
YouknowIreallydon'tknowhowtogoabout thisglobalwarmingthing,Ithinkthoughthat theyareusingthisasawaytomakemoney, plusifanyrememberstheresaHAARP Devicethatcanbeusedtocontrolthe weatherforgoodorbad,sotheycouldbe usingthattomesswithourweathersowe getscaredandbuygreenproductsandpay the carbon tax and all the rest, and don't get me wrong I completely believe in saving our environment, but, I just smell a BIG FAT DISGUSTING GREEN RAT
I'm sorry but this is way over-simplistic. I'm no fan of Al Gore but the e-mails in the 'climategate' are taken way out of context. The big problem is scientific illiteracy. The truth is probably not so dramatic. Making an effort is the key here. We dont need to live in Iron age tents, BUT why burn up fossil fuel needlessly with SUVs etc. It wont last for ever so we need it till we get the technology where it's no longer necessary. Climate change is complicated, not a conspiracy of science.
The truth... Well, now it is obvious that the truth does not matter any more. The envirofascists have their agenda set and are not bending the slightest even when new scientific evidence is presented that PROVES that the temperature changes are caused by solar activity!
What DO happen is that the mainstream media refuse to publish news of the new findings. The only reason for this that one can imagine is that they want to keep the public ignorant of the facts.
They are not taken out of context, this is clear cut propaganda. The dataset's that came with the mail's are the context! It is every bit as bad as it is made out to be, probably even worse. This does not mean we should not clean up our ways, but the science is jaded. This is beyond doubt at this point, for those of us who have followed the mails since their revealing.
Climate? That's what determines who lives & dies. Sure the mad scientists can engineer things to a small degree like cloud seeding & HAARP maybe but don't think we control the climate or can alter it without thermo nuclear war. The planet is a self-correcting system. It maintains steady levels to preserve life
Weather? That's what everybody talks about but nobody does anything about. Ever wonder why they have so many weather stations & broadcasts?
The utter nonsense & anal rhetoric of the AGW advocates has not only been shown to have been corrupted through the use of convoluted Al Gore ithms, but the weather & climate itslef has underlined the dominant influences that determine conditions of the planet.
CO2 is not a poison as are so many other emmissions from corporate operations. It is incapable of influencing the energy balances between incoming & outgoing radiation.
That applause was beautiful. why do these AGW pushers just ignore all the scandals, 1st Climate gate now glacier gate, I'm surprised they didn't try to deny it snowed last fortnight.
Godfrey was talking about Common Purpose on Alex Jones's show the other day.
"tell the house the difference between climate and weather"
The same can be asked of the plethora of green propaganda involving the weather, heat, flooding etc. This little retort in no way addresses the lies, deception and fraud being propagated.
The difference between weather and climate is this. When its really hot, the AGW people say, "See its global warming", but when the temp drops over a period of about 7 years, and its freezing they say "Oh thats just weather"
She is definately the eptiome of a 'Finnish Green'
comprehensiveboy 5 months ago
"Climate Mr. Davies is what we all have to put up with." LOVE IT GODDERS! I'm an environmental advocate but I am skeptic of governmental interference which tends to cater to corporations.
LiveFreeorDieGuy 7 months ago
Yeah, when there is global warming then it's colder, and when there's not, then is hotter. Really scientific explanation. Fuck you all.
branless 10 months ago
if you think there is no global warming, you are a lunatic.
Zatzzo 1 year ago
@Zatzzo Well, it's snowing up in Scotland right now - your argument is????
ukipwebmaster 1 year ago
@ukipwebmaster Well for now the trend is to have stronger winters, because the air is warmer theres more humidity in the air causing stronger storms, even snow storms so for a while the tendency should lead to stronger winter storms for now.
a01087483 5 months ago
@a01087483 I love trends like Dr. Ivar Giaever resigning..............
ukipwebmaster 5 months ago
Hilarious, your party actively promotes homeopathy and yet you have the nerve to call the scientific consensus flakey?! Every one of those points was pathetically easy to poke holes in, obviously a cold winter doesn't disprove a long term warming trend but of course any complex or deep arguments run counter to the oh-its-all-common-sense stop-being-so-poncey-its-all-so-simple arrogance of this pathetic little party, this is a party that celebrates ignorance and ridicules intelligence.
aqaspecification 1 year ago
@aqaspecification "your party actively promotes homeopathy"
You exaggerate and at least try and spell homoeopathy right. What we say is that if people want to choose this it is up to them and not the business of the state. Just like global warming - if you want to believe this crap it's up to you but don't drag the world down with this con job.
ukipwebmaster 1 year ago
@ukipwebmaster I spelt it the American way because that seems to be standard on youtube, my computer automatically spell-checks so it seems a petty point, similar in fact to the "you can tell I'm a sceptic because I don't dress like a scarecrow" line, a very mature way to counter an argument indeed. No party aims to ban homoeopathy, the fact that you mention it explicitly in your manifesto and not under a more general banner of 'alternative medicine' certainly suggests you do support it.
aqaspecification 1 year ago
@aqaspecification You really like the sound of your own voice don't you?
ukipwebmaster 1 year ago
@ukipwebmaster "Blah blah blah" again a mature counter argument, there seems to be a pattern emerging here.. I think it's pretty laughable that your only proof of a lack of scientific consensus is a 2008 meeting of climate sceptics paid for by an American, deeply conservative think-tank! Google a few surveys, the vast majority of the scientific community in fields related to climate science and in that field agree on this matter and so does the majority of research. You're a conspiracy theorist.
aqaspecification 1 year ago
@aqaspecification "You're a conspiracy theorist." - Simply not true. However you are just a theorist along with your fellow believers in the global warming religion.
ukipwebmaster 1 year ago
@aqaspecification What about the emails hacked from the University of East Anglia? Do you suggest we believe Al Gore and David Rothschild, this climate crap was originally spouted at a CFR meeting in the 1970's to get every human being paying a tax into this ponzi scheme. Why dont you check this out!
mulefa 1 year ago
@aqaspecification...there are as many scientist out there who debunk the idea of global warming as there are that try to confirm it...you believe what you want, all i know is that nearly every goverment around the world are raking in a whole lot of extra taxes through their global warming policies...i know which theory i believe in
graviogranulio 1 year ago
@aqaspecification
Oil Spill On purpOse,they nOt cleaning up,are THEY!!!
Try Haarp,just in case yOu are nOt aware Of it,it is (*MAN MADE*)
Tesla didn't give the tec tO ROB us,did he!
And nOw Even yOu people play thOse,THEIR games...
...
CheckinGagaiNagain 1 year ago
@ukipwebmaster As for your suggestion that by taking decisive action on an issue based on information which is the scientific consensus the government is somehow overstepping its bounds, well clearly that is ridiculous, the data issues Godfrey mentioned are complicated issues and whichever side you're on certainly more complicated than the simple misdirection he seems to suggest and regardless of them the scientific consensus is still against the sceptics.
aqaspecification 1 year ago
@aqaspecification Blah Blah Blah
ukipwebmaster 1 year ago
@ukipwebmaster By all means argue about policy and how to tackle the issue but when you take a subject that has been scrutinised immensely by the scientific community and then have the obscene arrogance to assume that you, as a non-expert are right and they wrong because of some flawed argument (a cold winter, I mean really?) and make your case in such a nauseatingly self-satisfied and rude way then clearly you have demonstrated that you lack the maturity to be a part of any parliament EU or UK.
aqaspecification 1 year ago
@aqaspecification I'm not a politician - I simply post videos. The 'scientific community' is not speaking with one voice on this - look up the Manhattan declaration. The 'experts' that push the global warming agenda from Al Gore downwards have a vested interest in keeping this scam going. The only thing 'green' about this is the dollars they earn and the gullibility of people like you.
ukipwebmaster 1 year ago
testing
katards 1 year ago
Liberals SUCK!!!
amsplg 2 years ago
The attitude of warmists when confronted with the fact that AGW data was faked is "So what?" The 'research' is apparently merely a means to an end---window dressing to sell otherwise intolerable policies to a reluctant world.
courtesyZone 2 years ago
nice
fcuk off to the man in pink shirt. IT'S NOT WEATHER AROUND THE WHOLE FCUKING WORLD!!! IT'S CLIMATE!!!!!
HumanityWins 2 years ago
bravo! I agree, HAARP and other weather/climate agencies manipulate the atmosphere. Its obvious at this point, they tell us to recycle and then launch rockets that emit insane amounts of fossil fuel that affects the weather..not to mention chem trails and mass pollution. This video is real that dude bloom hit it on the head. PEACE -Vendetta KIngz
vendettakingz84 2 years ago
NOT NICE COMMENT ABOUT THE LADY REGARDLESS OF HER BELIEFS - man made climate change is bullshit but I thought UKIP were better than this.
PHONEYPOLITICS 2 years ago
Yeah it compromises his argument. I have no doubt she is a horrid person but that is improper debating technique.
FrankinHolland 2 years ago
it was hilarious tho
lsucowboys99 2 years ago
global warming is a conspiracy to scrap the gold standard.
MrHenryscat 2 years ago
@MrHenryscat I think that went a long time ago
ukipwebmaster 2 years ago
according to who? the entire economics profession? I think my totally uninformed opinion counts for more than theirs.
MrHenryscat 2 years ago
MrHenryscat
ha ha lol what a naive twit you are !!
ZEITGEISTism 2 years ago
@MrHenryscat how is it a conspiracy to scrap the gold standard? I think we really need a gold standard, but do you mean that its just for taking the attention away from the economy? or how do you figure?
tobycoolrunner 2 years ago
I think he has a good point, but it's badly made. UKIP have worked hard to present themselves as a professional organisation capable of holding senior office - PLEASE be careful not to turn people against you by sinking to their level & making personal comments about other member's clothing choices.
neversaidnever76 2 years ago 2
I think Godfrey was being unkind to scarecrows!
ukipwebmaster 2 years ago
*climate change is real
*it is caused by human activity
*it is threatening the planet in ways we can only begin to imagine.
aerobique 2 years ago
Scary!
ukipwebmaster 2 years ago
if manmade climate change is real, would you please care to tell me what the global average temp should be?
globalnomad62 2 years ago
@aerobique You must be a liberal, you will fall for any lie.
sidfu 1 year ago
All I Have To Say Is HAARP; Discuss
That Topic, They Could Be USing That To Control Our Weather To Get All Of Us Scared So We Buy Green Products And Pay The Carbon Tax Or Worse Kill Us Off Like We've Heard People In The News Talk About The Local News Even.
InterconnectedWorld 2 years ago
Finally someone who says it like it is! Thank you Mr Bloom!
jaredcal1227 2 years ago
YouknowIreallydon'tknowhowtogoabout thisglobalwarmingthing,Ithinkthoughthat theyareusingthisasawaytomakemoney, plusifanyrememberstheresaHAARP Devicethatcanbeusedtocontrolthe weatherforgoodorbad,sotheycouldbe usingthattomesswithourweathersowe getscaredandbuygreenproductsandpay the carbon tax and all the rest, and don't get me wrong I completely believe in saving our environment, but, I just smell a BIG FAT DISGUSTING GREEN RAT
InterconnectedWorld 2 years ago
They want you to think its warming. The weather is in your mind! And its getting cold!
CP91311 2 years ago
Superb
GSDebunked 2 years ago
GREAT stuff Mr Bloom is that best riposte the tree hugger Lib dem can come up with ? Bloody lefties ....you are rumbled!!
TooDarnSoulful 2 years ago
nice flame :) "scarecrow"
LowDeamon 2 years ago
he has some interesting things to say but he's totally wrong about the snow in texas being the first time in 100 years
Drowzyy 2 years ago
I'm sorry but this is way over-simplistic. I'm no fan of Al Gore but the e-mails in the 'climategate' are taken way out of context. The big problem is scientific illiteracy. The truth is probably not so dramatic. Making an effort is the key here. We dont need to live in Iron age tents, BUT why burn up fossil fuel needlessly with SUVs etc. It wont last for ever so we need it till we get the technology where it's no longer necessary. Climate change is complicated, not a conspiracy of science.
Ep1cure 2 years ago
The truth... Well, now it is obvious that the truth does not matter any more. The envirofascists have their agenda set and are not bending the slightest even when new scientific evidence is presented that PROVES that the temperature changes are caused by solar activity!
What DO happen is that the mainstream media refuse to publish news of the new findings. The only reason for this that one can imagine is that they want to keep the public ignorant of the facts.
Conspiracy? You tell me.
Scurck 2 years ago
@scruck
simply wrong what you say ... i mean.. WRONG!
aerobique 2 years ago
They are not taken out of context, this is clear cut propaganda. The dataset's that came with the mail's are the context! It is every bit as bad as it is made out to be, probably even worse. This does not mean we should not clean up our ways, but the science is jaded. This is beyond doubt at this point, for those of us who have followed the mails since their revealing.
fucknuaf 2 years ago
Climate? That's what determines who lives & dies. Sure the mad scientists can engineer things to a small degree like cloud seeding & HAARP maybe but don't think we control the climate or can alter it without thermo nuclear war. The planet is a self-correcting system. It maintains steady levels to preserve life
Weather? That's what everybody talks about but nobody does anything about. Ever wonder why they have so many weather stations & broadcasts?
They warned of a coming ice-age in the 70's
Slavestorms 2 years ago
he should have said: when its cold its weather, and when its warm its climate change
dinkolino2 2 years ago 5
The utter nonsense & anal rhetoric of the AGW advocates has not only been shown to have been corrupted through the use of convoluted Al Gore ithms, but the weather & climate itslef has underlined the dominant influences that determine conditions of the planet.
CO2 is not a poison as are so many other emmissions from corporate operations. It is incapable of influencing the energy balances between incoming & outgoing radiation.
Search "Chilling Stars".
pondman27 2 years ago
thank you mr. bloom!
maddies1 2 years ago 4
That applause was beautiful. why do these AGW pushers just ignore all the scandals, 1st Climate gate now glacier gate, I'm surprised they didn't try to deny it snowed last fortnight.
Godfrey was talking about Common Purpose on Alex Jones's show the other day.
therhythmicmenace 2 years ago 3
give this guy a medal or two or even three.
tucays1 2 years ago 2
"I don't dress like a scarecrow" brilliant line Godfrey...
Brooksy19811 2 years ago 4
"tell the house the difference between climate and weather"
The same can be asked of the plethora of green propaganda involving the weather, heat, flooding etc. This little retort in no way addresses the lies, deception and fraud being propagated.
WinstonSmith46 2 years ago 2
The difference between weather and climate is this. When its really hot, the AGW people say, "See its global warming", but when the temp drops over a period of about 7 years, and its freezing they say "Oh thats just weather"
They change the weather to suit the pont of view!
itsabomberscope 2 years ago 16