Burn the gospel of lunacy, my ritual has begun. Bathe in the darkness, it is Satan's creation. For life eternal in the demon's lodge. Burn the book of lies with flames. Choose the darkened spiraling path. Unholy world of doom and gloom awaits. Breath of demons soon flow. Darkness in your soul for all time. A gathering storm in a shadowy realm. Black clouds boiling in the sky. Signed in the shrine of blood 'n fear. The diabolical temple of hell. Satan's feet mark the ground.
All evolutionists have is hot air on the mostly anonymous Internet. We have the real science backed up by the $10,000 Life Science Prize. You can evolve from a chicken and win the prize or make cowardly remarks on websites until you ultimately die and become a creationists after it's too late. My last remark to you is something that everyone understands: CLUCK, CLUCK, CLUCK.
what truth are you talking about? The arguement presented above is really stupid. Its like saying chocolate tastes sweet so it has to be alive. Just because our eye does magnificient amount of calculation doesnt mean it is created.
@RicoRicanNYC Homochirality destroys the evolutionists theory of life came from raw chemicals, molecules could have never organized themselves in perfect order and digital code that takes Intelligence! Life from non life is chemically and mathematically impossible!
Oh yeah because science saying that everything exploded from nothing and that life just started to exist from nothing makes so much more sense then a Divine creator made everything. Fact is that there are more things disproving science then proving science but that's why you just ignore those facts so you can sleep better at night because you would never sleep if you really knew that God was real and you were going to hell.
Now if you had faintest idea about physics or science, then I would bother debating about big bang. But based on your stupid arguement, I m pretty sure that you absolutely know nothing about science. Hence, I m going to say, forgive me for disturbing an angry mob of uneducated bible freaks. You guys can stick with your fairy tales and waste your life on stupid words of bible.
So you don't believe in the Big Bang? So what you believe that just everything existed? What that's wrong because science that nothing always existed. Wanna try again?
If you had the faintest idea about physics you would know the big bang is impossible. Ever heard of the law of conservation of angular momentum? If not, go study it and then explain to me with your superior knowledge how 1 planet spins backwards, and another one sideways. Then explain why at least 8 moons spin the wrong way, not to mention entire galaxies.
If you knew anything about computers you would see how amazing this video really is.
@ChristianTruthHammer Homochirality destroys the evolutionists theory of life came from raw chemicals, molecules could have never organized themselves in perfect order and digital code that takes Intelligence! Life from non life is chemically and mathematically impossible!
@ChristianTruthHammer Seriously, you can't call the eye a computer. It's a camera. The "calculations" are extremely parallelized: there are about 92 millions of rod cells and 4.5 millions of cone cells, every calculation is performed separately by each cell, and their response is quite slow: they can only perceive flickering under 250 Hz (and being optimistic) . This is not enough to call the human eye a computer. At least not an efficient one. With millions of CPUs I can do the same, better.
@mylongsword science doesnt suggest that everything exploded from nothing, science cannot be disproved, science IS, science is a process of gaining knowledge by means of experimentation and confirmation, blind ignorant religosaur
@mylongsword let me clear up what seems to be a common confusion about science. Science is a methodology, not a set of conclusions. So "science" doesn't really say anything, other than perhaps it is the best methodology for disproving claims. The conclusions that scientists come to are done using science, here there is room for argument, but to argue against "science" in general is to argue against the pursuit of knowledge.
It could be possible that every conclusion scientists have come up with to date is completely wrong, but this would not "disprove science", as you would have to use science in order to come up with the conclusion that the current theories are wrong. i.e. through testing of theories, you should work to disprove claims, not prove them. it is very easy to fit certain knowledge to make certain claims look good, not so much to subject certain claims to all knowledge.
@mylongsword there are literally 1000s of independently verifiable tests done that support the theory of evolution, you may say evolution is incorrect and those tests in fact point to a different theory, however, saying evolution is not real science because it is incorrect, is incorrect, scientists are following the scientific method, if you have found some amazing piece of evidence that disproves all of the previously done tests that supports evolution then please submit it for peer review.
@mylongsword Laugh at reality. Hope it will go away...
Why would you expect to find an entirely complete fossil record? (this expectation illustrates a lack of awareness in the field of archaeology). Here is a "missing link" Australopithecus, care to explain this? Care to invalidate 1000s of independently verifiable pieces of evidence for evolution and explain how the real causes link to a god?
evidence beside the fossil records: watch?v=i1fGkFuHIu0
@mylongsword Homochirality destroys the evolutionists theory of life came from raw chemicals, molecules could have never organized themselves in perfect order and digital code that takes Intelligence! Life from non life is chemically and mathematically impossible!
TheDarkLordLucifer 4 months ago
I've simulated hundreds of thousands of Retinal Ganglion Cells in real time just using a laptop. This guy is hilariously stupid.
Alex53129 1 year ago
@Alex53129
All evolutionists have is hot air on the mostly anonymous Internet. We have the real science backed up by the $10,000 Life Science Prize. You can evolve from a chicken and win the prize or make cowardly remarks on websites until you ultimately die and become a creationists after it's too late. My last remark to you is something that everyone understands: CLUCK, CLUCK, CLUCK.
BereanBeacon1 1 year ago
What a bullshit video! Scientific evidence, my ass!!!
satanicluju 2 years ago
The truth hurts huh
RicoRicanNYC 2 years ago 5
what truth are you talking about? The arguement presented above is really stupid. Its like saying chocolate tastes sweet so it has to be alive. Just because our eye does magnificient amount of calculation doesnt mean it is created.
satanicluju 2 years ago
You trying to compare chocolate to the human eye?
Watch the video a few times and maby you will get the point. I see your a big fan of satan huh?
RicoRicanNYC 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@RicoRicanNYC Homochirality destroys the evolutionists theory of life came from raw chemicals, molecules could have never organized themselves in perfect order and digital code that takes Intelligence! Life from non life is chemically and mathematically impossible!
5tonyvvvv 7 months ago
Oh yeah because science saying that everything exploded from nothing and that life just started to exist from nothing makes so much more sense then a Divine creator made everything. Fact is that there are more things disproving science then proving science but that's why you just ignore those facts so you can sleep better at night because you would never sleep if you really knew that God was real and you were going to hell.
mylongsword 2 years ago 2
Now if you had faintest idea about physics or science, then I would bother debating about big bang. But based on your stupid arguement, I m pretty sure that you absolutely know nothing about science. Hence, I m going to say, forgive me for disturbing an angry mob of uneducated bible freaks. You guys can stick with your fairy tales and waste your life on stupid words of bible.
satanicluju 2 years ago
Oh I'm sorry forgive me please explain what exactly exploded. And explain to me exactly how nothing forms life.
mylongsword 2 years ago 2
So you don't believe in the Big Bang? So what you believe that just everything existed? What that's wrong because science that nothing always existed. Wanna try again?
mylongsword 2 years ago
*Well that's
mylongsword 2 years ago
*says that
mylongsword 2 years ago
If you had the faintest idea about physics you would know the big bang is impossible. Ever heard of the law of conservation of angular momentum? If not, go study it and then explain to me with your superior knowledge how 1 planet spins backwards, and another one sideways. Then explain why at least 8 moons spin the wrong way, not to mention entire galaxies.
If you knew anything about computers you would see how amazing this video really is.
ChristianTruthHammer 2 years ago 4
@ChristianTruthHammer Homochirality destroys the evolutionists theory of life came from raw chemicals, molecules could have never organized themselves in perfect order and digital code that takes Intelligence! Life from non life is chemically and mathematically impossible!
5tonyvvvv 7 months ago
@ChristianTruthHammer Seriously, you can't call the eye a computer. It's a camera. The "calculations" are extremely parallelized: there are about 92 millions of rod cells and 4.5 millions of cone cells, every calculation is performed separately by each cell, and their response is quite slow: they can only perceive flickering under 250 Hz (and being optimistic) . This is not enough to call the human eye a computer. At least not an efficient one. With millions of CPUs I can do the same, better.
BatchDrake 6 months ago
@mylongsword science doesnt suggest that everything exploded from nothing, science cannot be disproved, science IS, science is a process of gaining knowledge by means of experimentation and confirmation, blind ignorant religosaur
utrapzab 1 year ago
@mylongsword let me clear up what seems to be a common confusion about science. Science is a methodology, not a set of conclusions. So "science" doesn't really say anything, other than perhaps it is the best methodology for disproving claims. The conclusions that scientists come to are done using science, here there is room for argument, but to argue against "science" in general is to argue against the pursuit of knowledge.
egokick 1 year ago
It could be possible that every conclusion scientists have come up with to date is completely wrong, but this would not "disprove science", as you would have to use science in order to come up with the conclusion that the current theories are wrong. i.e. through testing of theories, you should work to disprove claims, not prove them. it is very easy to fit certain knowledge to make certain claims look good, not so much to subject certain claims to all knowledge.
egokick 1 year ago
@egokick Evolution is not real science.
mylongsword 1 year ago
@mylongsword there are literally 1000s of independently verifiable tests done that support the theory of evolution, you may say evolution is incorrect and those tests in fact point to a different theory, however, saying evolution is not real science because it is incorrect, is incorrect, scientists are following the scientific method, if you have found some amazing piece of evidence that disproves all of the previously done tests that supports evolution then please submit it for peer review.
egokick 1 year ago
@egokick
Evolution: Long ago in a galaxy far far away... LOL
enjoy your fairy tale
test? lol where are these missing links?
mylongsword 1 year ago
@mylongsword Laugh at reality. Hope it will go away...
Why would you expect to find an entirely complete fossil record? (this expectation illustrates a lack of awareness in the field of archaeology). Here is a "missing link" Australopithecus, care to explain this? Care to invalidate 1000s of independently verifiable pieces of evidence for evolution and explain how the real causes link to a god?
evidence beside the fossil records: watch?v=i1fGkFuHIu0
egokick 1 year ago
@mylongsword Homochirality destroys the evolutionists theory of life came from raw chemicals, molecules could have never organized themselves in perfect order and digital code that takes Intelligence! Life from non life is chemically and mathematically impossible!
5tonyvvvv 7 months ago
FANTASTIC!!
RainhadoCanto2 2 years ago 2
wow
unicron24 2 years ago 2