Added: 4 years ago
From: giinda
Views: 60,641
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (246)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • A 1 gun arms shipment.. This kind of police move will be coming to a town near you. lol

  • 1:51, the officer explains his actions.

  • TO THE COMMENTS BELOW YOUR CAPS LOCK IS ON. Thought you ought a know.

  • POLICE PUNCHING THE MAN RECKLESSLY AT 4:16......DISGRACE

  • @1humanbeen MY MISTAKE...AT 1:23

  • @1humanbeen MEN BUYING A GUN IN LONDON PUTTING IT IN THEIR CAR WITH AMMUNITION AND SILENCER AND TAKING IT HOME TO USE IT ON ANOTHER HUMAN BEING.........DISGRACE!!

    POLICE DETAINING AND ARRESTING THE MEN AND PREVENTING THIS GUN FROM BEING USED ON OUR STREETS...........VERY WELLDONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @teabag882 I UNDERSTAND YOUR POINT HOWEVER THE MAN WAS ON THE FLOOR SURRENDERED BUT YET THE OFFICER HAD TO PUNCH HIM AROUND SIX TIMES......ITS BASICALLY LIKE SHOOTING A RAINDEER DEAD AND THEN KICKING IT IN THE HEAD JUST TO MAKE SURE ITS DEAD.

  • @1humanbeen WELL CONSIDERING THAT THIS CHAP MAY HAVE HAD A GUN STILL ON HIM AT THAT STAGE AND THAT AS I SAID ALREADY HE BOUGHT THE GUN TO USE ON OUR STREETS, I DON'T THINK THERE WILL BE MANY PEOPLE HAVING SYMPATHY FOR HIM.

  • @teabag882 LISTEN MY POINT IS THAT THEY HAD HIM SURRENDERED ON THE FLOOR BUT YET THEY HAD TO PUNCH HIM UP?......TRY TO UNDERSTAND. YES CONGRATULATIONS TO CRIMINALS WHO ARE BEING PUT AWAY....THEIRS NO NEED FOR THE POLICE TO GO OVERBOARD IF THIERS NO NEED TO.

  • @1humanbeen yes they did they said why they have a weapon ans what is it going to be used for to kill so yes use all force needed even if it is over the top if you buy that gun its not to show off they had ammo its to be used to KILL MURDER end of

  • @1humanbeen lets be quite honest if they didnt have a firearms the police wouldnt be dealing with them in the first place, so he wouldnt be punched simple if you dont like it fuck off, you wouldnt last a week doing there job, and on looking at that its not recklessly, remember this is a firearms callout, the highest level of danger they lucky to only be punched/kicked they resist against officers with guns on a callout of this nature its a rather peaceful and effective way of dealing with them

  • LOL At The Cop Running Round Like A Headless Chicken At The Car

  • Robberies on armoured cars here in Canada are rare, as the government at least allows the guards to carry side arms. In the UK they get a stab vest and a crash helmet. There is no such thing as self-defence in the UK now without getting a criminal record.

  • @bgibb101

    In Australia security guards are able to carry side arms but it seems that many of the attacks are crooks after the guns themselves.

  • Co19 occasionally are known to kill the odd criminal as well, but for the most part the odd mentally retarded woman, drunken barrister and the odd tube passenger is their bread and butter.

    CO19 are a bloody disgrace, intoxicated on their own firearm fed ego culture they are forever keen to make their bones and no doubt individual officers throwing a party to celebrate their 'coming of age.'

    They even include hidden jokes in statements to coroners enquiries.

  • @tpsossff - So we should disarm CO19 and routinely arm regular beat coppers?

  • @bgibb101

    No, but the selection and training of armed officers must change. So called instructors have created a gun fed macho/ego culture within the group. This culture does not exist in the army because there is far better discipline during training. By the time the training has finished the soldiers are totally at ease with their weapons and are far more competant to cope with situations that require a high level of flexibility and common sense. I call that real professionalism.

  • @tpsossff bullshit

    

  • @lonelykatana They kill nowhere near that number.

  • co19 in the line of fire is coming back on to itv4 or a new series on itv1 in november

  • @lonelykatana Hmm, hard to tell sarcasm through text with no tone of voice!! XD.... idiot

  • @lonelykatana You... are an idiot

  • Comment removed

  • @clayjames no ur not

  • @clayjames no ur not cause ur not aloud to say if your in a special forces group on public websites

  • all the officvers look the same!!!! lol

  • Look at the cunts in BMW'S. That's the last thing they need for their ego.

  • @RiiDDiiM Just like the penis on your forehead.

  • Oink oink oink.

  • I am sure if there wasn't any negative coverage of the police in the media, yours truly wouldn't even have a view on them. As you obviously don't have a negative view on the armed froces because of this.

    The NWO want the masses to be calling out for a EU police force, so you lot think the current local law enforcement agencies are bad and inadequete.

  • CO19 die slow racist cunts scum of the earth kill 100s of inocent people a year

  • @killoffkili 100's ??

  • @killoffkili 100's ??

    Ironic thing is you probably love the army

  • @glaxev yes the media doesnt cover it

  • Can you please post some proof

    why wouldn't the media cover it ?

    yes i understand part of the conspiracy

    but surely they wouldn't post any negative stuff in the media about the police if that was the case, and you can clearly see negative images of the police in films or any tabloid paper today.

    However in terms of military involvement overseas there is very little coverage of say "corruption". As war is a bigger money making industry than the police.

  • @glaxev no the only killing u hear of was something like terrorism many times these co19 cunts do a raid and get trigger happy look it up

  • Yes, the bastards even managed to murder an unarmed and naked bad in a bed.

  • @killoffkili I have looked it up, please more proof and you didn't respond to the rest of my post.

  • @killoffkili You're fucking stupid.

  • @killoffkili hahaha innocent? you must be having a LAUGH and no there not racist its just the majority of people using guns on the street are black?

  • Oink oink oink.

  • The should give CO19 officers M5s!

  • Oink oink oink.

    This is how we murder innocent people.

    Oink oink oink.

  • @fremlinskent whats a pig ?

  • A pig is occasionally wrongly called a "police officer".

  • @fremlinskent Your blatantly a fed undercover

    let me get this straight your MI5, MOD, something part of the government, an INSTIGATOR !!

  • Wrong. Pigs are pigs.

  • and...

  • @fremlinskent you dont know shit about innocent people blatentently

  • @obradleyguitarist

    I know that Ian Tomlinson was innocent. So was Jean Charles de Menezes. Both were murdered by the police.

  • @fremlinskent alright then , next time ur a hostage in a terrorist situation, just rely on ya good friend god (for whom there is not a scrap of evidence for) to help you out. where as ill be laughing at you when i hear it on the news

  • The next time I go on the Tube I will be watching out for pigs murdering innocent people.

    Fuck the pigs.

  • @fremlinskent Shut the fuck up you stupid cunt!!! If the bomb had gone off if there was one then you would be sayin omg they need to do there job!!!

  • @SASBSPARA

    There was no bomb. So it wouldn't have gone off.

    So shut the fuck up, you stupid moron.

  • @fremlinskent And how the fuck do they know that you fucking idiot!!! Ohh yer police get suplied with crystal balls these days... You much of a retard!!!

  • @SASBSPARA

    Don't you think the pigs should make sure that the people they gun down in cold blood are bomb carriers?

    Let's hope it happens to you. You are a waste of air.

  • @fremlinskent Yes they should make sure they are 100% sure but with no time to spare and with some one who might decide to blow people up i think they made the right choice...

    I have no intension on become black or any other colour than white so i think i am at the bottom of the list of being shot at tbh and i would never have any intension being a suspect in carryin a bomb!! Lets hope you get gunned down for no reson cuz i rather think that would be funny!! since no one would miss you!

  • You think the pigs murdering an innocent person is "the right choice".

    Fuck you, you stupid arsehole.

  • @SASBSPARA agreed.

  • @fremlinskent haha hopefully it will be you.

  • @fremlinskent your just wrong and you now it so you have to use a useless argument to argue against someone who has proved you wrong, just giv up.

  • Why did you switch from slagging off the Royal Marines to the Police? And didn't you watch the video, they clearly had a gun in the car.

  • Pigs = human arseholes.

  • @fremlinskent Pigs = Police

    Get a life shit face... Your just useless scum and you know it!!!

  • @SASBSPARA dickheads=criminals=shut your face you peice of scum!

  • These are the British Armed Police, a mistake they make, it fucks them up, however if Jean Charles de Menezes was shot by a Brazilian Police officer coz they thought he was a terrorist, no one would give a shit. Becouse it happen in the UK, all hell breaks. So you people who are dissing the police, remeber when you are getting robbed or some holds a gun toward your head, Dont bother dailing 999 for the police, Just get yourself shot by a robber. You two face fuckers.

  • @adamericscott believe every work u say mate, these fuckers dont understand

  • @adamericscott agreed mate

  • @fremlinskent murder means intent killing with anger ect... the police did not "murder" him as u sed , they shot him because he was reaching for his phone and he was a suspected bomber, if he had of been a bomber and thew police had not shot him, then hundreds of people wud be dead. its called a mistake and its a risk that the police had to take to make this country safer

  • Mr de Meneze's murder had nothing to do with anger. The pigs intended to kill him no matter what.

    He did not "reach for his phone". He was underground, you stupid moron. That shows how much you know about this murder.

    Mr de Menezes was not a bomber. The pigs murdered him. the world is not a safer place because of his death.

    Fuck the murdering cowardly pieces of shit pigs. And fuck you too.

  • @fremlinskent And they did this because he may have had a bomb... If he had a bomb and set it off i am sure you would be on here bitching that the police didnt do there jobs... So shut ur useless mouth and go hang ur pointless life cuz seriously it isnt worth living the way u sound... Probly some reject that thinks he is someone hard coming on here loud mouthing people off...

  • @SASBSPARA

    He didn't have a bomb. The pigs murdered an entirely innocent man. Fuck them all. I hope they get cancer and rot to death.

  • @fremlinskent Again how do they know he didnt... You got no life have you... If he had a bomb!!!! IF IF IF IF IF!!!! Then u would be bitching!!! Sayin they should have shot him they wernt doing their job properly!!! Get a fucking job n stop being an arsehole!!!

  • @fremlinskent nice..

    

  • @Bull3tBoiz Your not an armed officer, you dont shoot because someone has a gun, in 2008 the police shot less than double figures of bullets. Secondly, yes there are split second decisions, but in most cases SO19 or CO19 follow a suspect and take by surprise, giving the party no time to react. Also you wouldnt post yourself in such pathetic grammer either, and wouldnt openly state your comment without reason.

  • me thinks fremlinskent needs to take a chill pill, mistakes happen get over it. im sure they didn do it on purpose.

  • @kawasakinuts

    Suppose it happened to a member of your family. Would you say "get over it" then? I doubt it.

    The pigs got away with murder. Fuck them.

  • yh i no he needs to get over it they didnt go out on purpose to shoot a man dead

  • @xboxboff

    The police set out to shoot this man. He was innocent. Nobody shoots somebody 7 times in the head by accident.

    Fuck the pigs.

  • yh he was innocent but he ran with a big bag coulod have been a bomb towards the tube so they shot him its his own falut

  • @xboxboff

    Fuck you. He didn't run. Not one independent witness confirmed the pigs version of events.

    Even if he did run, so what? I hope something like that happens to you. You deserve it. Cunt.

  • the cctv did though

  • @xboxboff

    Another lie. The CCTV wasn't working (supposedly). The police probably destroyed it because it would have shown the truth. Mr de Menezes did not run. The pigs murdered him. Idiots like you still believe otherwise.

  • when the dude was first shot they shown it on the news

  • @xboxboff

    No they didn't. The CCTV was supposedly not working. So there was nothing to show.

  • one they got told a terrorist was going to the underground and when you deal with a terrorist that could have a bomb on you don't shout armed police you shoot him in the head. and the reason for that is that it stops him taking a shit load of people with him. And the photo of the real terrorist wasn't sent to the police till three hours after the shooting. And how would you like it if a raghead had a bomb on and he was on the same train as you. You would be glad that the police shot him.

  • @fremlinskent mate in that situation no matter what happened it was either Jean Charles are potentially 30-40 passengers plus 3 officers minimum with serious injuries or dead... In that situation had the police not reacted they would have been helpers to the murdering pigs. at the end of the day it happened, and the police have since learned from this

  • Look, the police are paid to live or die as a duty as you describe, they are there to help protect and provide security to its residing country it lies in. They shot him as ordered because of concerns for the security of the country. It was bad communication and the tensions of the suspect being possibly a bomber that ended his life. The police did face an inquiry at court but it was thrown out because it was not the direct officers fault. Get a grip and calm down.

  • The pigs did not face an inquiry. There was an inquest with a corrupt judge. He would not allow any criticism of the pigs, he was biased entirely in the pigs, and he would not allow the jury to reach any verdict they wished. He, the corrupt judge, would not allow the jury to return a verdict of unlawful killing.

    So get a grip and demand a proper inquiry into the murder of Jean Charles de Menezes. So far the murdering filth have got away with it.

  • @fremlinskent judges swear on a oath to the king that they dont provide people with a corrupt inquiry so how does that work? :L

  • @obradleyguitarist

    They lie.

  • @fremlinskent they cant lie..:L

  • @obradleyguitarist

    Ridiculous. Pigs lie all the time. They sometimes get caught. When the pigs murdered Jean Charles de Menezes they said they shouted a warning. Not one independent witness heard it. When the pigs murdered Ian Tomlinson they said he had not contact with them. Then a film came out showing a pig assaulting and murdering him.

    The pigs lie all the time. Shit on them.

  • @fremlinskent police are people, people lie

  • @fremlinskent ur argument is useless

  • @1b74 agreed some who actually knows why they shot him ^^

  • @obradleyguitarist they shot hi because they had intelligence that he had an explosive device on him.

    how else are you going to stop stop a suicide bomber?

    your not going to walk up to him and say hi please put the bomb down.

    Somehow it isnt going to work 

  • While I agree with you, in that he did not run and the police had no reason to shoot him, you must realize that the officer who shot him, had never shot a person in anger, and tensions were VERY high after the events of that day, and so while I don't condone the shooting I ask you to try to loo at it from both sides.

  • @lestrang511

    The pig who shot Mr de Menezes should have faced a trial. The inquest was a whitewash and a cover up. The judge refused to allow the jury a free verdict, nor even to offer criticism of individual pigs.

    The bastard got away with murder.

  • It was not an accident, they shot him because they were ordered to.

    They shot him 7 times to make sure he was dead because they were equipped with shit guns so they could conceal them.

  • ur talking a load of bullocks i hope u no that

  • I am not, I have watched the documentary on it. It was on (itv or bbc I forget)

  • u r

  • @fremlinskent they dint shoot him fucking 7 times in the fucking head!!! they used hollow point bullets which is an instant kill and stops the bullet from coming out the other side of the body so it dont kill no1 else!! stop chatting shit..

  • Good job!

  • that was soo fucking coool :)

  • And Furthermore the police may have shot Jean Charles de Menezes when he was innocent but if he was a terrorist, like the Police thought, and they had tried to negotiate with him, he would have detonated. And then there would have been a massive uproar that the police are not as agressive enough with potential terror suspects.

  • But Jean Charles de Menezes was not a terrorist. So the police murdered an innocent man. It could happen to you. Or your family.

    That "what if he was a terrorist" argument is just a licence for the police to murder.

  • @fremlinskent If armed officers yell at you to stop, you should stop. It was obviously a horrific mistake but de Menezes did himself no favours by jumping a police barricaded turnstile and refusing to stop when told to. The whole of London was on high alert, what did he expect would happen?!

  • @aisukurimusandoichi

    You are repeating the police lies. He didn't jump over a turnstile, he wasn't told to stop.

    The pigs lied through their arses and murdered an entirely innocent man.

    The inquest jury did not believe the pigs version of events. Not one independent witness corroborated the pigs lies. None at all.

    The pigs are murderers. Fucking bastards.

  • you know this because ? you took like you were there

  • well the armed police officers there shouted a number of clear warning he failed to stop and ran with a dogey looking bag it could of been a bomb so they fired to pretect the public.

    what would u have done if u was the police officers

  • @xboxboff

    No, the pigs did not shout any warnings. There was not one independent witness which corroborated the pig's version of events. Not one. The pigs lied. He didn't run.

    Stop spreading pig lies.

    The pigs murdered and idiots like you let them get away with it. Fuck them, and fuck you too.

  • i no they shout warnings and what would u have done if u was in there shoes well

  • @xboxboff

    They didn't shout any warning. Not one independent witness agreed with the pig's version of events. They lied.

  • they did but because the guy didnt understand alot of english he carried on running so they could the shot

  • @xboxboff

    He didn't run and he wasn't warned. The pigs lied. And idiots like you keep repeating the pigs' lies.

  • no he wasnt armed but he still ran y bcant u accpeted the truth

  • @xboxboff

    He didn't run. No independent witness saw Mr de Menezes run. Not one. Stop repeating the pigs' version of events.

  • well have u seen the cctv no well then

  • @xboxboff

    The inquest jury did not believe the pigs' version of events. That is good enough for me.

  • good 4 u but he ran and paid the price

  • @xboxboff

    He didn't run. But even if he did run, murder is not a valid response.

    The pigs murdered an innocent man. Fuck them.

  • There were issues with the De Menezes shooting; several armed offciers followed him from his house making no attempt to challenge and arrest him even though he got on a bus while they thought he had a bomb. These same armed officers followed him onto the train and sat down, waiting for more heavily armed backup to arrive. Once backup arrived, the officers tackled him without warning and then, once he was restrained, the officers opened fire and he was shot a total of 7 times in the head.

  • I would like to comment on the post in which someone said that Armed Police are murderers. I am no expert but I have a particular interest in policeing and particularly Armed policeing. As far as I know Armed Police will only shoot if threatened.

  • Jean Charles de Menezes did not threaten anyone. The pigs murdered him.

  • is it Legal to own a Glock17 or any of the other Glock  models in the united kingdom? Private Messege me back please.

  • no, it is not legal

  • @FLAMEZ8931 No it fucking anit

  • CO19 will only shoot if their life is under threat.

  • Not true. They murdered Jean Charles de Menezes. He was unarmed and entirely innocent.

    Basically the police are murderers.

  • how the fuck can u say that prick

  • We recently had an update documentary on the Met's CO19 called 'In The Line Of Fire', but haven't located this on YouTube as yet. Does anyone have any plans to upload this recent documentary? Great Vid. Thanks.

  • Someone did upload it once but it got removed for copyright. The production company requested that Youtube removed it.

  • Hello Zildjian285. I am most grateful for your kind reply. I had a sneaky feeling that the Production Company may have done something like that. I have often seen these CO19 convoys screaming through London traffic at speed, and was always impressed by the way these Professionals literally dominated the roads, and positioned themselves in sanitising their Area Of Operations! A formidable show of force in the overall protection of the citizens of London! many thanks for your message. Best wishes

  • Its actually statisically harder to get in C019 that the SAS. (as regards to applicants and those admitted) Not saying theyre better just thought it was a cool statistic

  • u sure about that ??

  • Comment removed

  • At 32 you're too old to join the army,let alone get to the level before you're allowed to try out for the regiment,or are you already in the army?.

  • Comment removed

  • you cant just join the SAS you have to be a serving soldier and then invited in. plus you dont have a chance do you really think member of the SAS have a youtube channel and i can bet you have a facebook too. IDIOT!

  • wat u dont think i know that dick head!!!

  • its because lith... CO19 has the same training to get in as they get every 3 months on most areas... Firearms and strategic training is done very regularly and if you fail to pass, you are then relieved from CO19 back to an appropriate field. In the SAS, generally once your in, your in.

    The SAS are far better trained... and trained for much more... not just firearms.

  • obviously u nob sas are fukin militery dese fukers are trained ta nik ya and sumtimes if they hav to shot at ya sas are traind ta kill

  • the bread and butter of it is, the SAS are the Army, these guys are armed coppers. Simple as that.

  • SAS are not the army. they are special forces. they can do anything

  • you prick do some reseach sas are part of the army look it up

  • SAS are part of their Army, retard. Your just as much of a joke as this 'hardman476' prick.

  • look at 2.17 on the left hand side, can anyone else see the policemen repeatedly punch the suspect?

  • It's a home office approved technique to get them to comply or release their arm(s).

    If you suspect they might have firearms you don't fuck about with them, you take them down fast and hard.

  • Yes, its allowed for firearm officers, they have no other means to aprehend the suspect, unless they let go of their weapons, of course they cant do that because it could be grabbed by the suspect.

  • they also have asps, and cs spray and no they cant shoot you for non-complinace....the same laws govern both police and public when either one ie. police or public pull the tigger

    see criminal law act 1967 sc.5

  • Yes I know they carry PPE that all regular coppers would carry. I also know your a retard.

    Yes they can shoot you for non-compliance, if you are in possesion of a firearm.

    I think you will find the police and the public dont have the same rights in concernsto pulling the trigger.

  • you idoit what you saying there is two different laws for the public and the police?? you retard....the law on self defence is THE SAME for both police and public thus stated in the criminal law act 1967 sc3 (1) states ""A person may use such force as is reasonable in the circumstances in the prevention of crime, or in effecting or assisting in the lawful arrest of offenders or suspected offenders or of persons unlawfully at large."

    where the does it say police can do different! this.

  • Yes, their are two different laws, I dont think you will find it is legal for vigilanties, to stop and shoot subjects with their '.22's', where it will however be legal for armed police to do it.

    A person may use such force as is reasonable in the circumstances in the prevention of crime, or in effecting or assisting in the lawful arrest of offenders or suspected offenders or of persons unlawfully at large.

    That doesnt include firearms. Or seeking for suspects.

  • 1.24 - 1.25 I liked the sly kick to the ribs there to get the bloke to drop to the floor..

  • really? What makes you say that?

    Our police force reacts to any firearms related issue with absolute seriousness. If you're seen with a weapon, replica or otherwise, you can expect a battalion of armed police officers to be on your back before you know it.

  • not because of public safty but because the state does not want anyone to have any type of weapon if are seen with one they will go metal because "how dare you have a weapon in the uk"

  • u cant compare them if u are going to compare swat to a special force i wud say the s.a.s but well we all know who wud win yes the sas

  • american swat needs to be better with firearm incidents since in america getting a gun is like getting a newspaper from the shop lol!

  • oh really and where did you get this info from??? idots from the pub, tv etc

    fed law superseeds all states law and thus the min requirment for buying any firearm is a criminal background check before the sale of any firearm

    some states like new york require firearms liencing like the uk

    and some like washington dc ban all handguns etc

    what have you got to say to that you utter thick sun reading cunt

    and guns are not banned here either only MOST handguns!!

  • Actually i have a uncle and 2 cousins in Alabama, and they said at the most to get a gun you need a carry permit, which is only with handguns. and so what? your saying that handguns are worse than shotguns or rifles? your the fucking idiot who probably reads the sun because you cant spell for shit!. Britains gun crime is still extremely low BECAUSE its difficult to get hold of a firearm legally.

  • what you think before the ban criminals would walk into a gun shop show them a lience and get the gun from the shop and then comite they crimes??? is that what you think??you are really stpuid if you believe that just goes to show you are a typical sun reader! cunt

  • Nice video, more please.

  • Last resort? C019 requires years of training, and an advanced knowledge of sociology, from first glance you appear to have nowhere near the intellect to join a specialist response unit, and psychological knowledge too poor to make the assumptions you just did. In other words, go eat a dick

  • watever....when u become black or asian or you can see the bigger picture in your everyday life then talk. If your a white guy or you dont experience police harrassment or brutality which is likely the way your sounding..keep your mouth shut

  • I have the hots for Matt Twist. I would fuck him given half the chance.

  • I hope you're not a bloke!

  • No I am not a bloke. All hot blooded woman thanks. If you know him I don't mind you telling him.