911 Predictably DOUBLED Defense spending at a time people were thinking we no longer needed a huge,Cold War sized military because the Cold War was over and it allowed us to militarily control the flow of oil ensuring our access to it & allowing us to deny access to anyone (China).What would defense spending be like today without 911?Why would America still need a huge military?For what?Who would the enemy be.Of course 911 was an inside job.NO 911=no huge military & no control of world's Oil.
right on brother! it seems we must all keep trying to do what we can. i will try to forward links to media people and others from my side. i'm also thinking to speak with physics teacher from my high school. guess we should be fortunate they held it, regardless where, and i suppose it's not easy to arrange stateside with all the pressure to block the truth. ps. i hope i can visit Toronto someday, i always meet nice people from there and hear it's an amazing city :) peace
@sjcsea2 I think they were held in Toronto because there was an idea that the Canadian govt, or other foreign govts, would be more willing to consider the evidence.
There will also be hi-res video coming out sometime in the next month, so I hear. Check out their website.
@WhatsReallyGoingOnUS hi, thanks for your reply. i guess i should have figured this out/already known this, before asking the question/making the post. anyhow, i appreciate your reply and also letting me know about the hi res videos. i'll check their website. i didn't know they had one, but will search for it now. btw, thank you for all your dedication for 911 truth and raising consciousness in general. it's been really helpful having your videos and link to forward to others. peace bro!
why do we have to keep proving that these buidlings were demolished...its obvious that they were ...enough already... We know they were so lets arrest the bastards we have enough evidence
@sjcsea2 dont know but I live in Toronto and i missed it and I heard the radio announcers mention it and ridicule the "truthers" when they had them on before the conference and I should have called into the station (Newstalk 1010 Gerry Agar show) and gave them a piece of my mind but I get stage fright so I didnt call in... I will just send them a link on their blog page or emails and let them watch for themselves...hopefully they will watch a bit and realize we are not crackpots...truth rules
it had to be a plane that hit the Pentagon because the perps would not have taken the chance that someone filming or with a a camera would not get a photo. (as hap'd with naudet and the north tower)
Not releasing the images feeds the dsinformation machine. but it is completely logical to conclude the plane hit the Pentagon
I agree. Whilst there isn't conclusive evidence either way, I can't help wondering why they WOULDN'T use a plane if that is what they want us to believe hit the building. They'd used one for each of the towers and the one destined for WTC7 or The White House or wherever the Shanksville plane was heading - why not the Pentagon? A plane hitting a wall at 500mph doesn't leave big debris: /watch?v=RZjhxuhTmGk
So this April Gallop pentagon employee walked through the alleged plane's impact hole with bare feet and was not burned by jet fuel residue bu the twin towers came down because it was burning so hot. My mind is spinning. Can you imagine what a real investigation would bring to light?
Re. the part with Barbara Honegger on the strike on the Pentagon, the video clips released by the Pentagon have never shown a plane, but these were released by the Pentagon, which definitely isn't reliable.
Jim Hoffman, a physicist, has three 9/11 research websites, 911reviewDOTcom, 911researchDOTwtc7DOTnet and wtc7DOTnet. I suggest starting with the first two for important analysis about the strike on the Pentagon ; photo evidence seen by too few people, and very good analysis.
Respond to this video... These hearings are like Ron Paul's run for president according to MSM they don't exist. Anyone that still believes the official conspiracy theory also believes in the Easter bunny and Santa Claus.
@scrxbandit The normal procedure in a plane crash is to reassemble the plane debris to find out what happened. None of the four planes were reconstructed. Titanium engines do not disappear. Wings do not fold up and follow the hull into a hole.
I can't believe there are idiots that STILL support the government lie...It seems to me that Americans have to be the dumbest fucks to ever walk the earth! The rest of the world is laughing at you America, time to take back your country before you get put in FEMA camps....Wait...maybe that's not such a bad thing..
The main issue I have, is that the govt could easily refute people's questions, if they so desired -- assuming they have the evidence. But they refuse to do so. They have 85 videos of the event, and we have seen 5 frames from one grainy video that was apparently too slow to capture the image of a plane.
So, either the govt like having people be "conspiracy theorists", or they don't actually have the evidence to back up their story.
This has been flagged as spam show
OATH ★ KEEPER: Military brass, CIA & FBI now reveal 9/11 lies & kept secrets. houmadabrave on both Facebook & MySpace
CLANSON®
Create Local Awareness Networks to Secure Our Nation
houmadabrave 1 week ago
everybody who believes the official story should visit his brain doctor!
seppstein91 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
911 Predictably DOUBLED Defense spending at a time people were thinking we no longer needed a huge,Cold War sized military because the Cold War was over and it allowed us to militarily control the flow of oil ensuring our access to it & allowing us to deny access to anyone (China).What would defense spending be like today without 911?Why would America still need a huge military?For what?Who would the enemy be.Of course 911 was an inside job.NO 911=no huge military & no control of world's Oil.
waitew 1 month ago in playlist 911 Toronto Hearings
it is too late here comes WW3
CamillioD 2 months ago
right on brother! it seems we must all keep trying to do what we can. i will try to forward links to media people and others from my side. i'm also thinking to speak with physics teacher from my high school. guess we should be fortunate they held it, regardless where, and i suppose it's not easy to arrange stateside with all the pressure to block the truth. ps. i hope i can visit Toronto someday, i always meet nice people from there and hear it's an amazing city :) peace
sjcsea2 4 months ago
@sjcsea2 I think they were held in Toronto because there was an idea that the Canadian govt, or other foreign govts, would be more willing to consider the evidence.
There will also be hi-res video coming out sometime in the next month, so I hear. Check out their website.
WhatsReallyGoingOnUS 4 months ago
@WhatsReallyGoingOnUS hi, thanks for your reply. i guess i should have figured this out/already known this, before asking the question/making the post. anyhow, i appreciate your reply and also letting me know about the hi res videos. i'll check their website. i didn't know they had one, but will search for it now. btw, thank you for all your dedication for 911 truth and raising consciousness in general. it's been really helpful having your videos and link to forward to others. peace bro!
sjcsea2 4 months ago
why do we have to keep proving that these buidlings were demolished...its obvious that they were ...enough already... We know they were so lets arrest the bastards we have enough evidence
brandon420z1 4 months ago
why wasn't this hearing held in the States?
sjcsea2 4 months ago
@sjcsea2 dont know but I live in Toronto and i missed it and I heard the radio announcers mention it and ridicule the "truthers" when they had them on before the conference and I should have called into the station (Newstalk 1010 Gerry Agar show) and gave them a piece of my mind but I get stage fright so I didnt call in... I will just send them a link on their blog page or emails and let them watch for themselves...hopefully they will watch a bit and realize we are not crackpots...truth rules
brandon420z1 4 months ago
it had to be a plane that hit the Pentagon because the perps would not have taken the chance that someone filming or with a a camera would not get a photo. (as hap'd with naudet and the north tower)
Not releasing the images feeds the dsinformation machine. but it is completely logical to conclude the plane hit the Pentagon
winston2015 5 months ago
@winston2015
I agree. Whilst there isn't conclusive evidence either way, I can't help wondering why they WOULDN'T use a plane if that is what they want us to believe hit the building. They'd used one for each of the towers and the one destined for WTC7 or The White House or wherever the Shanksville plane was heading - why not the Pentagon? A plane hitting a wall at 500mph doesn't leave big debris: /watch?v=RZjhxuhTmGk
ThePeage 3 months ago
So this April Gallop pentagon employee walked through the alleged plane's impact hole with bare feet and was not burned by jet fuel residue bu the twin towers came down because it was burning so hot. My mind is spinning. Can you imagine what a real investigation would bring to light?
thamnosma 5 months ago
It's unfortunate that Professor Michel Chossudovsky is cut off or short.
mikecorbeil 5 months ago
Re. the part with Barbara Honegger on the strike on the Pentagon, the video clips released by the Pentagon have never shown a plane, but these were released by the Pentagon, which definitely isn't reliable.
Jim Hoffman, a physicist, has three 9/11 research websites, 911reviewDOTcom, 911researchDOTwtc7DOTnet and wtc7DOTnet. I suggest starting with the first two for important analysis about the strike on the Pentagon ; photo evidence seen by too few people, and very good analysis.
mikecorbeil 5 months ago
Respond to this video... These hearings are like Ron Paul's run for president according to MSM they don't exist. Anyone that still believes the official conspiracy theory also believes in the Easter bunny and Santa Claus.
cchessmaster 5 months ago
Shared.
jts3251 5 months ago
@scrxbandit The normal procedure in a plane crash is to reassemble the plane debris to find out what happened. None of the four planes were reconstructed. Titanium engines do not disappear. Wings do not fold up and follow the hull into a hole.
cchessmaster 5 months ago
@scrxbandit “Some men are born Mediocre men, some men achieve mediocrity, and some men have mediocrity thrust upon them” Joseph Heller
sucram286 5 months ago
@sucram286 great vid will circulate :-)
sucram286 5 months ago
@scrxbandit A tiny piece of aluminium for fucks sake.
borry2008 5 months ago
I can't believe there are idiots that STILL support the government lie...It seems to me that Americans have to be the dumbest fucks to ever walk the earth! The rest of the world is laughing at you America, time to take back your country before you get put in FEMA camps....Wait...maybe that's not such a bad thing..
TheOccultTruth 5 months ago
240 pixel quality video? HD cameras are available these days pretty cheap!
TheOccultTruth 5 months ago
@scrxbandit Hey dumbass. There was no engine, no nothing. All fake. Stupid fuck wake up.
chasev333 5 months ago
Thank you for attempting to shine a light into the darkness.
Pax00Imperium 5 months ago
@scrxbandit Are there wings? Fuselage? Engines?
The main issue I have, is that the govt could easily refute people's questions, if they so desired -- assuming they have the evidence. But they refuse to do so. They have 85 videos of the event, and we have seen 5 frames from one grainy video that was apparently too slow to capture the image of a plane.
So, either the govt like having people be "conspiracy theorists", or they don't actually have the evidence to back up their story.
WhatsReallyGoingOnUS 5 months ago 4
Thank-you to all who put in an effort to get to the truth.
oziKIRCICEGI 5 months ago 4
@oziKIRCICEGI Amen :)
CallASpadeASpade2U 3 months ago