yeah, but not by much. in terms of engines, lets just go with the EM1 (99-00 SI) and the EK9 (97-00 Type R). The EM1, with the B16A2 has about 160 BHP, while the EK9 has about 180 BHP. Not Much difference. Any other differences are really just appearance.
This car is nice but the new 2010 type R is a little bit faster. 220 HP...I would get an engine swap for an 09 si to a 2010 type R engine if I want more power though
2010 Civic Type R? You mean FD2 or FN2? FD2 Type R engine, the renewed K20A has 225 HP. This Civic EP3 Type R's old K20A engine has 220 HP. I drive Integra (RSX) DC5 Type R, and it is also equipped with the engine same as this EP3 Type R.
@gh3ttolov3 tru the type r is currently the top dog at honda but by no means does it take away from the current si....though a tad softer in tunning from factory the Si comes near or matches the R in all aspects of performance and we definitely can argue that the 8th gen si coupe is a looker compared to the bulky looking JDM R sedan.....
Well well, nice discussions... That's why I stay with my 2000 JDM Honda Integra DC2. Now that's a performance car. 195PS for 1080kg and technology that makes it the best FF ever made. The problem with Hondas today is that they are too heavy. Trust me, the DC2 remains the best Honda ever made.
Why o Why didnt they do a championship white edition for the UK market looks awesome in white and really upholds the red H tradition. Awesome car i love hondas they really are the ultimate quality product and another little known fact this baby was probally produced just up the road from me in Swindon LOVE IT!
"Again I owned one and it's not even close in comparision with a Mazdaspeed 3 which runs 14 flat in the 1/4"
Looky here, who is always mentioning the Mazda Speed 3? Wait look, it is sedansi0777! Stop putting words in my mouth you sneaky moron. You think i'm not tired of your BS either?
Let me just end this weird argument here. The Mazda Speed 3 is faster than the Si, as i mentioned earlier! But still didn't make the Si look bad anyhow. So there should be no more argument over which is faster
edmunds inside line: Mazdaspeed 3 0-60 time of 5.9 seconds and a quarter-mile time of 14.2 seconds at 100 mph. a staggering 1.3 seconds quicker to that speed than a Honda Civic Si.
My fricken god, this guy's an idiot! When did i ever said the Si was faster than the Speed 3? I clearly said the Speed 3 was faster! And just because of that doesn't make the 3 way way better than the Si
No you idiot, you keep saying that the si won in a test against a Mazdaspeed 3 when they never where in a test because the si didn't beat the GTI.. THe mazdaspeed 3 beat all sport compacts, the si wasn't even worth mentioning because it was beat by the GTI
The 2006 Sports Compact the Si took 2nd and the GTI 1st, YOU should really read what i wrote. I never said the Si won that test LOL! Not worth mentioning? LOL! You're funny, you praise the Speed 3 like some god
Well compared to the si it is a GOD otherwise I would have never traded my si for one. Not saying the si is a bad car but it's out of it's leaque when you try to compare it to a MS3. And I wouldn't call a si a 14 sec car! Thats like saying the MS3 is a 13 sec car because a couple ppl actually run a 13.9 stock
"14.5 at best in the 1/4mile.. Srt4 & Mazdaspeed 3 would roast it"
Someone give this guy a memory pill, for he is puttiong words in my mouth. You mentioned and compared the 3 to the Si, you fricken hilarious sneaky moron
LOL! Says who? I still see people buying Si, even racing with it. Mazda Speed did not make Si look bad at all. You say Si are slow, yet you have a Madza Speed 3 that gets 14s to high 13s? LOL! Get over yourself. Want fast cars? Corvette Z06, Viper SRT10, Ferrari F430, EVO, STi, all those are fast cars. Yet you stuck with a Mazda Speed 3 which is not even close to those cars times.
I'm talking about cars in the sport compact 20 -25k segment you f'n moron!! The si is not even close to the Mazdaspeed 3 in performance and this is a fact.. Actually the mazdaspeed 3 is so much faster the si isn't even worht mentioning.
What the hell do you expect? It's a fricken N/A 2.0L I4 car! The GTi took first place, the Si took second in it's class! Straight away isn't everything dumbass. I don't even hear a Mazda Speed 3 in the 2006 Sports Compact Test at all!
Do some research FOOL! The mazdspeed 3 "destroys" the si and gti no problem. Just TYPE in Mazdaspeed 3 on GOGGLE or YAHOO or whatever and read about the car. After this if you aren't clearly convinced that its obviously the best bang for the buck you're high on crack
It still broke 14s didn't it? So there we go, stop this argument already, there should be no debate about this because the Si has been able to break 14s
Yeah you turd I never said it couldn't run a 14.9 I said with "perfect" conditions it might be able to pull a 14.8. 15 sec 1/4 is way more realistic and most ppl are running about 15.2 to 15.5.
Retard! Don't you get it yet? You just read that the Si can break 14s! Yet you tell me what others time is! Either they are bad or average drivers! Realistics? Seeing is believing, it's real! The Si is capable of breaking 14s, STOCK! Yet you still debate about this, there should be no debate! You only brought up numbers that people had, but not even the best timing of the car! So there should be no more argument over something that's been solved
fucktard! You obviously weren't following what I was saying. I never said it couldn't!!!!!!!!! I said in perfect conditions it probably could run a "HIGH" 14..Which is barely breaking 15 you turd. The car is f'n slow and that is all this is way I traded it in.. Fun at first but the lack of "Torque" is f'n rediculous!
No sir, you are more of the retard. You claim 15.0 is the best timing, yet you were too ignorant to do your own research. Slow? Who the hell expect a Civic to be as fast as a V10+? Civics are I4s 2.0L! You expect a stock Civic to run under 13s? Not gonna happen, maybe few years from now. Lack of torque? Torque isn't everything you idiot. Honda designs their vehicles with more HP + light weight. A motor with more torque than the HP is unbalanced.
I used to own a 2007 Honda Civic si you f'n idiot!! You're not telling me anything I do not know. It's a slow ass torqueless wonder!! 15sec 1/4's are more accurate for this car seeing this is what 99.9% get.
Does it matters of what others time is? Are you still on crack? The car's best time was recorded, it is in the 14s! You're just claiming the average time to be the best! Look at the Sentra Spec-V for example, more torque, but less top end. The Si and the RSX type S are equal, less torque, more HP, and also, more top end.
You say 14's like it's running 14.0 -14.5... the f'n thing barely gets past 15 -14.9 at the very best!!! yes the rsx-s is basically a slightly faster "Torqueless" wonder as well.. It's ran I believe 14.7 which is slow but faster than a si. Do you realise had far behind an si would be behind a Mazdaspeed 3 in a drag race or any kind of race for that matter? Way way f'n behind.
You think like a retard, i said 14s and you think of all kinds of crap. Performance? Didn't i already mentioned that the 3 is "faster" while ago? Damn dude, what's your argument about? Racing? Performance is not everything either, as i see it, the Si was 2nd place and the GTI was 1st place in the Sports Compact Test! What is there to say more? That the 3 is faster? We've been over that already! There should be no more argument over this crap, CASE CLOSE
I'll let you pass on the calling me a "fool" sense I've been doging you to..However High 14's aren't common but doable, low 14's? Negative, and that is all.
You said "14.8 on a blue moon with perfect conditions" yet you say it can only get 15s? LOL! Ask any Si owners, they'll say it's able to break 14s stock. 15s are for either bad drivers or average, does it goes in your head yet idiot?
Hey DICK! You obviously aren't following what I'm saying.. They do run what I said which is low to mid 15 sec 1/4's. You keep saying "Break 14's stock" Keep dreaming. You probably seen ppl run their si's with slicks or something.. Slicks take off like 1/2 sec of your time. Slicks are a serious mod.
Damn, calm down pissy. Slicks? No. Mods? No. Good driver? Yes. The Si is capable of doing 14s, do your research idiot. I don't want to keep overrepeating what i said to thick skulls like you. So do your own research and find out
Look DICK! I'm the one doing all the overrepeating so shut your cock holster. I'm right you're wrong, you're the one whom needs to provide "creditable" proof not some YOUTUBE video that some azzclown made either.
LOL! I still laugh at your anger. Anyways, like i said, do some research, that does not mean go on youtube either idiot. Either you refuse to do so, or just cannot accept the fact that the Si can break 14s stock. I am truly sorry to offend you, NOT! LOL!
Mazda Speed 3 is just faster because it's a 2.3 turbocharged car. Without it, it'll just be a Mazda 3, which the Si will destroy it easily. Or like i mentioned before to the SRT4 guy, add turbo to the Si, it'll rape the Speed too.
YOu think the only difference between a Mazda 3 and a Mazdaspeed 3 is the Turbo??? WOW, you're ignorant by friend. Oh and a regular Mazda 3 is more of a fair match for the si, the SI doesn't "destory" it. Turbo on si- "destory" MS3? Not really,keep up? likely but where's your f'n warrently when it blows up?
Differences? I never mentioned any of that. I never said it was unfair either son. I stated the Speed 3 is faster, can't you read? turbocharged 2.3L against a N/A 2.0? It's pretty obvious dude. I was making a prediction of what might've happen when the Si is turbocharged or the Speed is N/A. Get it?
Sure you own one. Think all you want, the Civic still does not look stupid even in comparison to the 3. Speed 3 is unreliable, been recalled. The Civic, well it's still going on, it's relable, saves gas, and can also aim for performance. Madzaspeed 3 did not make the Si look like shit whatsoever, LOL! Dream on
The Mazdaspeed 3 has been unreliable? You're full of shit; it's had fewer problems than the SI... The SI has a shitty 3rd gear problem and rev hang and other crap... Mazdaspeed 3 had 1 recall you fag, it was a motor mount and the problem was solved!
Fag? Wow harsh words. I stand by my statement, the Si is more reliable than the Speed 3. Full of crap? You're the one full of it. 15.0 best time for Si? Yes you are very full of crap
15 sec for the 1/4 mile is fact for the si..Actually most only get about 15.2 -15.5 or so .15 flat is being nice and rearly seen. Show me all the Articles that have the si going under 15 sec...Exactly, pretty much source has it between 15.2 and 15.5
The type RR is a slightly lighter SI with HP & TQ ratings of a Honda S2000 but only 1,000 where sent to the U.S. @ 40k. No thanks, for 40k you can't do way way better. You know what you probably would hang with a srt-4 & Mazdaspeed 3 in the 1/4 mile but you certainly wouldn't roast them in a Civic Type RR. Plus turbo cars are a lot easier to get big gains from in the aftermarket.
you know nothing dude. what you're talking about is the USDM mugen civic si, which is selling for 30k and only 1000 made with the same HP and TQ as the original 06+ Si. The only made 300 RR and only in Japan or around Asia. Why the hell are you claiming a sedan Si and yet knows nothing about 8th gen Civics? It's not that i'm being an ass, i just have a thing for ignorant people
LOL! Yea sure you did own one. Best time for the Mugen Si and the regular Si is 14.7 as recorded to pros. 15 flat? LOL! Where'd you get that? You must be on some kind of crack. But like i said, i don't hate you, i just have a thing for ignorant people like you
15 flat is what most pros have achieved with this car you twat, get over it. Again I owned one and it's not even close in comparision with a Mazdaspeed 3 which runs 14 flat in the 1/4
15.0 is the average time, not the bestm keep that i mind. The Madza Speed 3 is just faster doesn't mean it made the Si look like shit. The Si still have better ratings
Sure 240HP doesn't sound bad but needs the TQ to go with it. Which it doesn't and because of this it will not own an srt-4 or the like. Plus those damn things went for 40k. Shyt you could've bought an EVO and had 5k left over for mods..lol
someone commented on how the civic type RR would roast a srt-4.. Not with 160 TQ it's not. It will probably be could for a 14.5 1/4 were srt-4's run 13.8.. Not even close. PUT the Mazdaspeed 3 in the mix and it will bet it in every aspect. Track/ drag/ whatever. Looks are subjective.
the mugen rr has 240 hp and 160 tq yes, and you forgot one very important thing, it's weight way lighter than the srt-4. an 06+ si with I/RH/E, Hondata Reflash and a decent driver can win against a stock srt-4 on 1/4 miles.
Srt-4 = 3000-3200lbs. high tq = more tire spin
Mugen Civic RR = 2600-2700lbs. lower tq = less tire spin, and then once vtec engage, bye bye.
you gotta be kidding me, a stock 06+ si is capable of doing 14.5 with decent driver, and the car weight like 200lb more than the mugen RR and with less HP and TQ.
TOO bad these k20's can't make any decent torque. I mean my mazdaspeed 3 makes like twice the torque of these things! Low torque makes for an annoying daily driver. I should know I owned a 07 si. The Type R has the same engine just tuned for a little higher hp / tq.. About 200hp and 141 tq which is still pretty weak considering the competition
Type R civic would need alteast 240hp and a lot more tq to beat a srt-4 / mazdaspeed 3. Otherwise, it's not even worth mentioning. I owned on of those 07 civic si sedans, it was weak. Yes with a turbo it would have been faster but my warrenty would've be voided.
Again, iTurboSrt4, you are weak at this argument. Targets a CTR and pop out of nowhere about the Si when i was talking about the CTR. Listing Si HP as it is CTR? How ignorant and retard. Civics are still better than Neon in many ways, so don't cry.
I haven't changed anything around, when your Type-R arrives in the U.S. in 2010, it will only have 197 horses. When those 1000 Muegen releases in the U.S., it will on have 197 horses. Civic Si, 197 horses. Civics are slow (0-60 in 6.6 seconds), just like the NSX ($70,000 for a V6). Maybe it's about time you stop wishing you lived in Japan and buy a real car!
just keep crying. You couldn't defend yourself with such ignorance. And just so you know, type R are different from Si. If it comes here, specs will be better and faster. You thought Si was the same as type R, you're ignorant.
You don't even know any shit about the CTR, 197 HP? Are you kidding? That's a Si and Mugen Si stupid ass. CTR is 225 HP and the Mugen Civic RR is 240 HP. Don't believe me, look it up dumb ass. Ignorant Neon boy talking a lot but no knowledge. I mentioned type R and all you mention is the Si (Mugen Si too) and claim them as type R. Doctors needs to check if your brain cell is functioning properly.
Can I get someone to translate this for hangguy209 because it's obviously too complicated for him to read this. I DON'T GIVE A SHIT ABOUT MUEGEN, RR, TYPE-R, CTR, XYZ OR 123! HERE IN THE UNITED STATES, THE TYPE-R WILL BE AND THE SI IS 197 HORSES! Point blank period! You want one of those Hondas, move to Japan but as of now, Civics here are SLOW!!! I don't car about k22, fg2, b12, who cares, Civics are SLOW!!!
Witness the fall of iTurboSrt4, for changing his subject. First you targeted the Civic type R with such wrong info, now you're changing the subject around? LOL! Pretty obivious you know nothing. By the way, Neons are slow, need turbo to be faster than a Civic Si. You make such statement that you cannot even defend. Listing the price wrong and wrong HP for the CTR and now talking about US and Japan? Yet you say you know more than me. It don't matter if it's in US or not, it exist idiot.
I know more about your wack ass car than you do. Here in the U.S. Civics only have ATMOST 197 horses. The 1000 Mugens coming to the U.S. will only have 197 HORSES! So you can keep dreaming that one day a fast Civic will arrive here but it will NEVER happen! Maybe you might have a shitty launch in a powerful FWD car because YOUR rookie ass can't drive!
Damn you still don't get it do you, Dodge boy. You stated the NEW CIVIC TYPE R, and cannot stand to defend. Who the hell says that i was talking about a Civic Si or a Mugen Civic Si? Are you that retarded? I clearly stated the NEW Civic type R and the JDM Mugen Civic RR many times, your reading skills sucks so much you cannot understand anything. You don't know shit and stated false info about the CTR, you are a moron. I beated many SRT4 in the past with my FG2 with I/H/E
You're such a dumbass who needs to stop thinking of a Si hahaha. First you talk smack about the new Civic type R, then cannot even give the correct info to it, shame. And now you're talking about a USDM Mugen Civic or Civic Si. I was talking about a Mugen Civic RR, a JDM, look it up. All these time you thought i was talking about a sorry USDM Mugen Civic? LOL! Now who's stupid? Oh wait, i shouldn't be correcting you, you're a Dodge guy, and Dodge KNOWS BEST yo! LOL!
Wrong? So tell me how much a 2007 Civic Type-R costs? Go to the Honda dot com website and tell me how much it costs. Go to the Mitsubishi website and tell me how much an Evo cost. I drive an Srt-4 so I already know that's right.
get your facts straight, you're thinking of the Mugen Civic RR, that one is 40k, and pushing at 240HP and will eat the SRT4 anyday, any track. 197 HP? LOL! Kid, that's a Si you're thinking of, the type R pushes 225 HP. So your pricing is wrong. It may not be turbocharged but the Civic itself will eat your SRT4 on circuits anydays.
The Civic Mugen is 197 horses dumbass. THE FASTEST CIVICS HAS 197 horsepower here in the United States. You guys can keep on dreaming about a fast civic but there aren't any! They are economy cars made to save on gas. They put a shiny "R" on them and you kids all think they magically become the fastest car in the world. Don't try to correct me because you end up sounding stupid in the end and my turbo would never lose to a 197 hp Honda!
Whoever say we were talking about a USDM Mugen Si? DON'T MAKE YOURSELF LOOK STUPID. Type R is not all that, it's just the best you can. Typical American boy do not know what he speaks of, it's a new Civic type R you're talking about, and the one in the video is an EP3-R, older version, not a Si, so who's stupid now? Either way, you could think you can take one type R out with your gas eater backfiring SRT4, but then again, can you beat it in it's game, cornerings?
yea but even Volkswagen has 75hp models who's speedometer shows top speed 270km. my point is that we are talking about japan!! most of the guys that will buy the car there will remove the top speed limiter and then they will have to change the speedometer with some kind of aftermarket. my 91' 1.5L hatch acn do 200-210km/hr easy and its like 90hp..imagine that monster being left behind by me in the freeway, lol
hehe.. The Speedometer Shows 180 km... but When You Put the Pedal to the floor.,. the speedometer goes "around" stupid.. If you go around Looking at a Speedometer at a Ferrari it will show 380 km.. It dosent mean that the car will drive that fast.. Stupid
i didnt know youtube was for retarts like you.make sense in your posts before saying bad words for someone you dont even know dickhead.what does "the speedometer goes "around" " mean?the limiter is electronicaly control by the ECU..its not a fucking carb engine like the one you drive
bad ass civic! wish they sold them here, teach these fucking ugly ass domestics whos boss.. oops i guess we are already doing that with our regular civics, with that beast we would plain out enbarras them ROFL! eat my rice bitches!
ey tetekop gij zij wss nog zo achterlijk om diesel te tanke.ik kan ook nen turbo op ne civic stoempe dan pap ik u ook af ze.maar daar hedde gij me uw piere vestand toch geen besef van.idioot.en daarbij alsk u rechtdoor ni kan molle he dan pak ik u wel in de bochte.rechtdoor rijde kan mijn bomma me hare fiat panda ook tot da der nen bocht komt dan zit ze in de gracht. lekt uwe lollie maar braafkes verder op en ga wa bloemekes plukke in uwe tuin.zeveraar.The only Jezus
lol, are you sure? a fat ass vr6 with 20 less hp than the type r? not to mention the 1000 hp difference. so yea, keep you VRshit off the hondas, and go race a hyundai
vr6 can go suck my ass, I am vw mechanic and there is no way you can even compare honda is 10 and vw is maybe a 3 when it comes to enginering so don't ever mock honda tell you know. Vw's are good for maybe 2 years then just forget about it my 94 gsr better then anything in vw's line of cars
should be made in japan keeps the jap sleekness to the car + every jap car made outside japan needs to be adjusted with bullshit emmissions so less power...
no way, the type r would crap all over the gti, there wouldnt be much competition! whilst the gti reaches top revs and runs out of breath the type r still got a few more revs to go!
if im not mistaking the white type r are the limited edition model!
JDM Only owns all other EUDM UKDM USDM Honda's/
09204418448 8 months ago
DAMN is that a type r?
XfsxnfsX 1 year ago
@XfsxnfsX NO SHIT!
dammyousuck 1 year ago
looks like an improved version of the eg
123adrianramirez 1 year ago
This IS the Civic EP3... zzzzz...
FroggieLongTongue 2 years ago
fugly! ep3 is better
karlfreakz 2 years ago
Stock for Stock Type R is far superior in any way shape and form compared to any Si ever.
Shaper404 2 years ago 8
yeah, but not by much. in terms of engines, lets just go with the EM1 (99-00 SI) and the EK9 (97-00 Type R). The EM1, with the B16A2 has about 160 BHP, while the EK9 has about 180 BHP. Not Much difference. Any other differences are really just appearance.
Sedrom 2 years ago
aw man, what a freakin sweet as car. man i love honda. i drive a 96 honda prelude vtec and it kicks ass! Honda forever!
richardklecka11 2 years ago
This car is nice but the new 2010 type R is a little bit faster. 220 HP...I would get an engine swap for an 09 si to a 2010 type R engine if I want more power though
Ricanguy98 2 years ago
...2009 Civic Type R isn't faster at all.
enjoichris411 2 years ago
2010 Civic Type R? You mean FD2 or FN2? FD2 Type R engine, the renewed K20A has 225 HP. This Civic EP3 Type R's old K20A engine has 220 HP. I drive Integra (RSX) DC5 Type R, and it is also equipped with the engine same as this EP3 Type R.
kazj14 2 years ago
anyone know what does the engine in this Type R compares to a 09 Honda Civic Si ???
anyone knows the specs ???
AndyRoddick969 2 years ago
this is the old ep3 type r. should have a k20a dohc vtec inside... ur usdm civic si has something like a k20z3 or sumthin....
anyhow, this civic would kill it on the road.
gh3ttolov3 2 years ago
so ur saying a Stock Type R would kill a 09 Si?
AndyRoddick969 2 years ago 3
really depends cause the si has a quicker aceleration but the type r could be faster. depends on the driver
clclclclcl90 2 years ago
dude, the type r wins hands down over an si. all type r vehicles from honda are at the pinnicle of honda performance engineering.
its a shame that americans don't get the type r and instead get a lamer si substitute. but a type r is seriously the far better car.
gh3ttolov3 2 years ago 10
@gh3ttolov3 tru the type r is currently the top dog at honda but by no means does it take away from the current si....though a tad softer in tunning from factory the Si comes near or matches the R in all aspects of performance and we definitely can argue that the 8th gen si coupe is a looker compared to the bulky looking JDM R sedan.....
94wasmyish 1 year ago
Nice ride, Just sold my 04 facelift in black, Man I miss it already, Looks good in white too but its for Japan only.
az958 2 years ago
This car is a dog; zero torque. My evo would toast this car. I wish Honda would wake up.
wtopp23 2 years ago
your evo also costs plenty more than this car. Keep in mind, we also don't have to worry about blowby after 100k miles, or evo trans issues :-P
RtnlSltn 2 years ago 2
More like after 60K. Mitsu's are the most unreliable pieces of shit ever.
Mok3sp33d 2 years ago
plus ur evo four wheel drive fool !
marvaluscivic 2 years ago
beautiul
tivi280188 3 years ago
Super nice.
AutoProCanada 3 years ago
Hmmm too bad they have not made the sedan model's type-R..;(...grrrrr...i'm gonna design it soon...u know the 7th gen 150i???....
TheWingspan 3 years ago
i think they already did
mashoe11011 3 years ago
can u please upload a video where its present??i havent seen one..even on google image!!
TheWingspan 3 years ago
just search fd2
mashoe11011 3 years ago
Well well, nice discussions... That's why I stay with my 2000 JDM Honda Integra DC2. Now that's a performance car. 195PS for 1080kg and technology that makes it the best FF ever made. The problem with Hondas today is that they are too heavy. Trust me, the DC2 remains the best Honda ever made.
SpoonHondaDC2 3 years ago
I'm sure a few NSX owners out there have a different opinion.
Metalhead852 3 years ago
and ek9 type r
sdubgti 3 years ago
@SpoonHondaDC2 Nah the NA2
c312eal 1 year ago
...just wanna drive this car...
tHeNeUtRaLnOtHiNg 3 years ago
I laugh at people who bitch at the 1/4 mile times of cars that are built for cornering and not straight aways. lol
Eskim090 3 years ago
Why o Why didnt they do a championship white edition for the UK market looks awesome in white and really upholds the red H tradition. Awesome car i love hondas they really are the ultimate quality product and another little known fact this baby was probally produced just up the road from me in Swindon LOVE IT!
jlbutters 4 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
fuck all!!!
sedansi0777 4 years ago
At least i know for the fact i was never the first to compare both cars. Someone tries to frame me. You tried tho. You want props and a high 5?
hangguy209 4 years ago
Go eat a dick I'm tried of responding to your false statements
sedansi0777 4 years ago
"Again I owned one and it's not even close in comparision with a Mazdaspeed 3 which runs 14 flat in the 1/4"
Looky here, who is always mentioning the Mazda Speed 3? Wait look, it is sedansi0777! Stop putting words in my mouth you sneaky moron. You think i'm not tired of your BS either?
hangguy209 4 years ago
sedansi0777 should really read what i wrote before putting words in my mouth
hangguy209 4 years ago
Let me just end this weird argument here. The Mazda Speed 3 is faster than the Si, as i mentioned earlier! But still didn't make the Si look bad anyhow. So there should be no more argument over which is faster
hangguy209 4 years ago
edmunds inside line: Mazdaspeed 3 0-60 time of 5.9 seconds and a quarter-mile time of 14.2 seconds at 100 mph. a staggering 1.3 seconds quicker to that speed than a Honda Civic Si.
sedansi0777 4 years ago
My fricken god, this guy's an idiot! When did i ever said the Si was faster than the Speed 3? I clearly said the Speed 3 was faster! And just because of that doesn't make the 3 way way better than the Si
hangguy209 4 years ago
No you idiot, you keep saying that the si won in a test against a Mazdaspeed 3 when they never where in a test because the si didn't beat the GTI.. THe mazdaspeed 3 beat all sport compacts, the si wasn't even worth mentioning because it was beat by the GTI
sedansi0777 4 years ago
The 2006 Sports Compact the Si took 2nd and the GTI 1st, YOU should really read what i wrote. I never said the Si won that test LOL! Not worth mentioning? LOL! You're funny, you praise the Speed 3 like some god
hangguy209 4 years ago
Well compared to the si it is a GOD otherwise I would have never traded my si for one. Not saying the si is a bad car but it's out of it's leaque when you try to compare it to a MS3. And I wouldn't call a si a 14 sec car! Thats like saying the MS3 is a 13 sec car because a couple ppl actually run a 13.9 stock
sedansi0777 4 years ago
"14.5 at best in the 1/4mile.. Srt4 & Mazdaspeed 3 would roast it"
Someone give this guy a memory pill, for he is puttiong words in my mouth. You mentioned and compared the 3 to the Si, you fricken hilarious sneaky moron
hangguy209 4 years ago
14.5 was for the TYPE RR you f'n idiot!!!
sedansi0777 4 years ago
RR or Si, any kind of Civic, i was never the first to mention the Speed 3 at all, LOL!
hangguy209 4 years ago
I mean you're really starting to piss me off.. I've owned "both" a 2007 Civic si and 2008 Mazdaspeed 3, I know what I'm f'n talking about
sedansi0777 4 years ago
What you're saying is your opinion, not fact. 3 made the Si looks bad? Why was the Si 2nd place during the test and the 3 was behind?
hangguy209 4 years ago
The mazdaspeed 3 wasn't in that test!!! AGAIN, the mazdaspeed 3 is the "KING" of the sport compact segment!!! The only car close is the subura WRX
sedansi0777 4 years ago
Tell that to someone that cares
hangguy209 4 years ago
My Mazdaspeed 3 embrasses SI's on a daily basis.
sedansi0777 4 years ago
LOL! Says who? I still see people buying Si, even racing with it. Mazda Speed did not make Si look bad at all. You say Si are slow, yet you have a Madza Speed 3 that gets 14s to high 13s? LOL! Get over yourself. Want fast cars? Corvette Z06, Viper SRT10, Ferrari F430, EVO, STi, all those are fast cars. Yet you stuck with a Mazda Speed 3 which is not even close to those cars times.
hangguy209 4 years ago
I'm talking about cars in the sport compact 20 -25k segment you f'n moron!! The si is not even close to the Mazdaspeed 3 in performance and this is a fact.. Actually the mazdaspeed 3 is so much faster the si isn't even worht mentioning.
sedansi0777 4 years ago
What the hell do you expect? It's a fricken N/A 2.0L I4 car! The GTi took first place, the Si took second in it's class! Straight away isn't everything dumbass. I don't even hear a Mazda Speed 3 in the 2006 Sports Compact Test at all!
hangguy209 4 years ago
Do some research FOOL! The mazdspeed 3 "destroys" the si and gti no problem. Just TYPE in Mazdaspeed 3 on GOGGLE or YAHOO or whatever and read about the car. After this if you aren't clearly convinced that its obviously the best bang for the buck you're high on crack
sedansi0777 4 years ago
Motor tend, other wise Known as "Honda trend"
sedansi0777 4 years ago
Motor tend -- 14.9 @94.7 <~ only source found for under 15 flat
sedansi0777 4 years ago
It still broke 14s didn't it? So there we go, stop this argument already, there should be no debate about this because the Si has been able to break 14s
hangguy209 4 years ago
Yeah you turd I never said it couldn't run a 14.9 I said with "perfect" conditions it might be able to pull a 14.8. 15 sec 1/4 is way more realistic and most ppl are running about 15.2 to 15.5.
sedansi0777 4 years ago
Retard! Don't you get it yet? You just read that the Si can break 14s! Yet you tell me what others time is! Either they are bad or average drivers! Realistics? Seeing is believing, it's real! The Si is capable of breaking 14s, STOCK! Yet you still debate about this, there should be no debate! You only brought up numbers that people had, but not even the best timing of the car! So there should be no more argument over something that's been solved
hangguy209 4 years ago
fucktard! You obviously weren't following what I was saying. I never said it couldn't!!!!!!!!! I said in perfect conditions it probably could run a "HIGH" 14..Which is barely breaking 15 you turd. The car is f'n slow and that is all this is way I traded it in.. Fun at first but the lack of "Torque" is f'n rediculous!
sedansi0777 4 years ago
No sir, you are more of the retard. You claim 15.0 is the best timing, yet you were too ignorant to do your own research. Slow? Who the hell expect a Civic to be as fast as a V10+? Civics are I4s 2.0L! You expect a stock Civic to run under 13s? Not gonna happen, maybe few years from now. Lack of torque? Torque isn't everything you idiot. Honda designs their vehicles with more HP + light weight. A motor with more torque than the HP is unbalanced.
hangguy209 4 years ago
I used to own a 2007 Honda Civic si you f'n idiot!! You're not telling me anything I do not know. It's a slow ass torqueless wonder!! 15sec 1/4's are more accurate for this car seeing this is what 99.9% get.
sedansi0777 4 years ago
Does it matters of what others time is? Are you still on crack? The car's best time was recorded, it is in the 14s! You're just claiming the average time to be the best! Look at the Sentra Spec-V for example, more torque, but less top end. The Si and the RSX type S are equal, less torque, more HP, and also, more top end.
hangguy209 4 years ago
You say 14's like it's running 14.0 -14.5... the f'n thing barely gets past 15 -14.9 at the very best!!! yes the rsx-s is basically a slightly faster "Torqueless" wonder as well.. It's ran I believe 14.7 which is slow but faster than a si. Do you realise had far behind an si would be behind a Mazdaspeed 3 in a drag race or any kind of race for that matter? Way way f'n behind.
sedansi0777 4 years ago
You think like a retard, i said 14s and you think of all kinds of crap. Performance? Didn't i already mentioned that the 3 is "faster" while ago? Damn dude, what's your argument about? Racing? Performance is not everything either, as i see it, the Si was 2nd place and the GTI was 1st place in the Sports Compact Test! What is there to say more? That the 3 is faster? We've been over that already! There should be no more argument over this crap, CASE CLOSE
hangguy209 4 years ago
The Mazdaspeed 3 is the New King of the sport Compact class you idiot.. It's not 2006 anymore.. The Mazdaspeed 3 is a 2007 model yr car.
sedansi0777 4 years ago
I'll provide more "proof" later..
sedansi0777 4 years ago
LOL! sedansi0777 seems really pissed LOL!
hangguy209 4 years ago
99% of all sources have the si doing the 1/4 in 15.2 to 15.5.. Mazdaspeed 3 14.0 to 14.4
sedansi0777 4 years ago
Those are with average drivers or sorry drivers. It was recorded that the Si can break 14s, you ignorant fool
hangguy209 4 years ago
I'll let you pass on the calling me a "fool" sense I've been doging you to..However High 14's aren't common but doable, low 14's? Negative, and that is all.
sedansi0777 4 years ago
low mid high 14s, i don't care. It broke 14s
hangguy209 4 years ago
Stock Civic si's run 15 sec 1/4 miles you fag.. Just stfu allready!!!!!!
sedansi0777 4 years ago
You said "14.8 on a blue moon with perfect conditions" yet you say it can only get 15s? LOL! Ask any Si owners, they'll say it's able to break 14s stock. 15s are for either bad drivers or average, does it goes in your head yet idiot?
hangguy209 4 years ago
Hey DICK! You obviously aren't following what I'm saying.. They do run what I said which is low to mid 15 sec 1/4's. You keep saying "Break 14's stock" Keep dreaming. You probably seen ppl run their si's with slicks or something.. Slicks take off like 1/2 sec of your time. Slicks are a serious mod.
sedansi0777 4 years ago
Damn, calm down pissy. Slicks? No. Mods? No. Good driver? Yes. The Si is capable of doing 14s, do your research idiot. I don't want to keep overrepeating what i said to thick skulls like you. So do your own research and find out
hangguy209 4 years ago
Look DICK! I'm the one doing all the overrepeating so shut your cock holster. I'm right you're wrong, you're the one whom needs to provide "creditable" proof not some YOUTUBE video that some azzclown made either.
sedansi0777 4 years ago
LOL! I still laugh at your anger. Anyways, like i said, do some research, that does not mean go on youtube either idiot. Either you refuse to do so, or just cannot accept the fact that the Si can break 14s stock. I am truly sorry to offend you, NOT! LOL!
hangguy209 4 years ago
Edmunds -- 15.1 @93.9 Road and Track -15.0 @95.6
sedansi0777 4 years ago
certainly not low nor mid 14's...14.8 on a blue moon with perfect conditions
sedansi0777 4 years ago
I-VTEC YO!!! Lame asses
sedansi0777 4 years ago
You seem pissed
hangguy209 4 years ago
Mazda Speed 3 is just faster because it's a 2.3 turbocharged car. Without it, it'll just be a Mazda 3, which the Si will destroy it easily. Or like i mentioned before to the SRT4 guy, add turbo to the Si, it'll rape the Speed too.
hangguy209 4 years ago
YOu think the only difference between a Mazda 3 and a Mazdaspeed 3 is the Turbo??? WOW, you're ignorant by friend. Oh and a regular Mazda 3 is more of a fair match for the si, the SI doesn't "destory" it. Turbo on si- "destory" MS3? Not really,keep up? likely but where's your f'n warrently when it blows up?
sedansi0777 4 years ago
Differences? I never mentioned any of that. I never said it was unfair either son. I stated the Speed 3 is faster, can't you read? turbocharged 2.3L against a N/A 2.0? It's pretty obvious dude. I was making a prediction of what might've happen when the Si is turbocharged or the Speed is N/A. Get it?
hangguy209 4 years ago
Now I own a 2008 Mazdaspeed 3..Makes the si look like shyt in comparision
sedansi0777 4 years ago
Sure you own one. Think all you want, the Civic still does not look stupid even in comparison to the 3. Speed 3 is unreliable, been recalled. The Civic, well it's still going on, it's relable, saves gas, and can also aim for performance. Madzaspeed 3 did not make the Si look like shit whatsoever, LOL! Dream on
hangguy209 4 years ago
The Mazdaspeed 3 has been unreliable? You're full of shit; it's had fewer problems than the SI... The SI has a shitty 3rd gear problem and rev hang and other crap... Mazdaspeed 3 had 1 recall you fag, it was a motor mount and the problem was solved!
sedansi0777 4 years ago
Fag? Wow harsh words. I stand by my statement, the Si is more reliable than the Speed 3. Full of crap? You're the one full of it. 15.0 best time for Si? Yes you are very full of crap
hangguy209 4 years ago
15 sec for the 1/4 mile is fact for the si..Actually most only get about 15.2 -15.5 or so .15 flat is being nice and rearly seen. Show me all the Articles that have the si going under 15 sec...Exactly, pretty much source has it between 15.2 and 15.5
sedansi0777 4 years ago
15.0 - Average drivers
15.5 - Sorry drivers
14.7 - Good drivers
hangguy209 4 years ago
lol@ 14.7 :D
JgHaverty 4 years ago
The type RR is a slightly lighter SI with HP & TQ ratings of a Honda S2000 but only 1,000 where sent to the U.S. @ 40k. No thanks, for 40k you can't do way way better. You know what you probably would hang with a srt-4 & Mazdaspeed 3 in the 1/4 mile but you certainly wouldn't roast them in a Civic Type RR. Plus turbo cars are a lot easier to get big gains from in the aftermarket.
sedansi0777 4 years ago
you know nothing dude. what you're talking about is the USDM mugen civic si, which is selling for 30k and only 1000 made with the same HP and TQ as the original 06+ Si. The only made 300 RR and only in Japan or around Asia. Why the hell are you claiming a sedan Si and yet knows nothing about 8th gen Civics? It's not that i'm being an ass, i just have a thing for ignorant people
hangguy209 4 years ago
Ohh God forbid I confussed the Mugen si with the RR! Type RR - 1/4 around 14.5 Mugen si- 1/4 around 15 flat si - 1/4 around 15 flat
My screen name is what it is because I used to own a peice of shyt 2007 civic si sedan
sedansi0777 4 years ago
LOL! Yea sure you did own one. Best time for the Mugen Si and the regular Si is 14.7 as recorded to pros. 15 flat? LOL! Where'd you get that? You must be on some kind of crack. But like i said, i don't hate you, i just have a thing for ignorant people like you
hangguy209 4 years ago
15 flat is what most pros have achieved with this car you twat, get over it. Again I owned one and it's not even close in comparision with a Mazdaspeed 3 which runs 14 flat in the 1/4
sedansi0777 4 years ago
15.0 is the average time, not the bestm keep that i mind. The Madza Speed 3 is just faster doesn't mean it made the Si look like shit. The Si still have better ratings
hangguy209 4 years ago
better ratings than a Mazdaspeed 3??? You're kidding right?
sedansi0777 4 years ago
Sure 240HP doesn't sound bad but needs the TQ to go with it. Which it doesn't and because of this it will not own an srt-4 or the like. Plus those damn things went for 40k. Shyt you could've bought an EVO and had 5k left over for mods..lol
sedansi0777 4 years ago
people buy a car that they want for what ever price they can afford, it doesn't matter if it's slower than an EVO or STI.
hangguy209 4 years ago
someone commented on how the civic type RR would roast a srt-4.. Not with 160 TQ it's not. It will probably be could for a 14.5 1/4 were srt-4's run 13.8.. Not even close. PUT the Mazdaspeed 3 in the mix and it will bet it in every aspect. Track/ drag/ whatever. Looks are subjective.
sedansi0777 4 years ago
the mugen rr has 240 hp and 160 tq yes, and you forgot one very important thing, it's weight way lighter than the srt-4. an 06+ si with I/RH/E, Hondata Reflash and a decent driver can win against a stock srt-4 on 1/4 miles.
Srt-4 = 3000-3200lbs. high tq = more tire spin
Mugen Civic RR = 2600-2700lbs. lower tq = less tire spin, and then once vtec engage, bye bye.
hangguy209 4 years ago
14.5 at best in the 1/4mile.. Srt4 & Mazdaspeed 3 would roast it
sedansi0777 4 years ago
A stock civic si can run about 15.1 1/4... The Mugen with the extra power should be about 14.5 nothing special..
sedansi0777 4 years ago
you gotta be kidding me, a stock 06+ si is capable of doing 14.5 with decent driver, and the car weight like 200lb more than the mugen RR and with less HP and TQ.
hangguy209 4 years ago
14.5? Not hardly my friend. Try 15.0 with an excellent driver.
sedansi0777 4 years ago
14.8 or 14.7 is actually the best timing. 15.0 is for average drivers fella
hangguy209 4 years ago
Yeah okay whatever..I've seen plenty of people with Mods on their 06-08 si's and not be able to break 15sec.
sedansi0777 4 years ago
That meaning they suck as hell
hangguy209 4 years ago
This Civic Type R thing looks a lot like the 05 civic si here in the states.... Ugly. My opinion don't get all emotional on me now!
sedansi0777 4 years ago
TOO bad these k20's can't make any decent torque. I mean my mazdaspeed 3 makes like twice the torque of these things! Low torque makes for an annoying daily driver. I should know I owned a 07 si. The Type R has the same engine just tuned for a little higher hp / tq.. About 200hp and 141 tq which is still pretty weak considering the competition
sedansi0777 4 years ago
Type R civic would need alteast 240hp and a lot more tq to beat a srt-4 / mazdaspeed 3. Otherwise, it's not even worth mentioning. I owned on of those 07 civic si sedans, it was weak. Yes with a turbo it would have been faster but my warrenty would've be voided.
sedansi0777 4 years ago
Neon SRT4 suck, that's why they stop producing it, LOL! Civics are still producing
hangguy209 4 years ago
Oh yea, forgot to mention, don't need a Civic type R to spank the SRT4, just drop in a turbo to the Si, it'll spank the SRT4 like nothing.
hangguy209 4 years ago
Again, iTurboSrt4, you are weak at this argument. Targets a CTR and pop out of nowhere about the Si when i was talking about the CTR. Listing Si HP as it is CTR? How ignorant and retard. Civics are still better than Neon in many ways, so don't cry.
hangguy209 4 years ago
I haven't changed anything around, when your Type-R arrives in the U.S. in 2010, it will only have 197 horses. When those 1000 Muegen releases in the U.S., it will on have 197 horses. Civic Si, 197 horses. Civics are slow (0-60 in 6.6 seconds), just like the NSX ($70,000 for a V6). Maybe it's about time you stop wishing you lived in Japan and buy a real car!
-Mopar!
iTurboSrt4 4 years ago
just keep crying. You couldn't defend yourself with such ignorance. And just so you know, type R are different from Si. If it comes here, specs will be better and faster. You thought Si was the same as type R, you're ignorant.
hangguy209 4 years ago
NOPOWER rules and there ain't nuthin better than nascar boy yeahh! lol
jtowndown90 4 years ago
iTurboSrt4
You don't even know any shit about the CTR, 197 HP? Are you kidding? That's a Si and Mugen Si stupid ass. CTR is 225 HP and the Mugen Civic RR is 240 HP. Don't believe me, look it up dumb ass. Ignorant Neon boy talking a lot but no knowledge. I mentioned type R and all you mention is the Si (Mugen Si too) and claim them as type R. Doctors needs to check if your brain cell is functioning properly.
hangguy209 4 years ago
Can I get someone to translate this for hangguy209 because it's obviously too complicated for him to read this. I DON'T GIVE A SHIT ABOUT MUEGEN, RR, TYPE-R, CTR, XYZ OR 123! HERE IN THE UNITED STATES, THE TYPE-R WILL BE AND THE SI IS 197 HORSES! Point blank period! You want one of those Hondas, move to Japan but as of now, Civics here are SLOW!!! I don't car about k22, fg2, b12, who cares, Civics are SLOW!!!
iTurboSrt4 4 years ago
Witness the fall of iTurboSrt4, for changing his subject. First you targeted the Civic type R with such wrong info, now you're changing the subject around? LOL! Pretty obivious you know nothing. By the way, Neons are slow, need turbo to be faster than a Civic Si. You make such statement that you cannot even defend. Listing the price wrong and wrong HP for the CTR and now talking about US and Japan? Yet you say you know more than me. It don't matter if it's in US or not, it exist idiot.
hangguy209 4 years ago
yeah i just drop that b12 engine in my car that you listed up there its a 1.2 liter dohc lol
jtowndown90 4 years ago
too much tq on FF = shitty launch for a rookie like you.
hangguy209 4 years ago
N/A 150,000+ miles = still good
Turbo 100,000+ miles = not good
SRT4 230 hp - 230 tq
USDM Mugen Civic 197 hp - 139 tq
Mugen Civic RR 240 hp - 160 tq = SRT4 Killers
Civic Type R 225 hp - 159 tq
too much tq will give you a shitty if you're not use to it or no slick tires on a FF.
so go back to school learn how to read before you start crying to me about the USDM mugen civic.
hangguy209 4 years ago
I know more about your wack ass car than you do. Here in the U.S. Civics only have ATMOST 197 horses. The 1000 Mugens coming to the U.S. will only have 197 HORSES! So you can keep dreaming that one day a fast Civic will arrive here but it will NEVER happen! Maybe you might have a shitty launch in a powerful FWD car because YOUR rookie ass can't drive!
iTurboSrt4 4 years ago
Damn you still don't get it do you, Dodge boy. You stated the NEW CIVIC TYPE R, and cannot stand to defend. Who the hell says that i was talking about a Civic Si or a Mugen Civic Si? Are you that retarded? I clearly stated the NEW Civic type R and the JDM Mugen Civic RR many times, your reading skills sucks so much you cannot understand anything. You don't know shit and stated false info about the CTR, you are a moron. I beated many SRT4 in the past with my FG2 with I/H/E
hangguy209 4 years ago
iTurboSrt4
You're such a dumbass who needs to stop thinking of a Si hahaha. First you talk smack about the new Civic type R, then cannot even give the correct info to it, shame. And now you're talking about a USDM Mugen Civic or Civic Si. I was talking about a Mugen Civic RR, a JDM, look it up. All these time you thought i was talking about a sorry USDM Mugen Civic? LOL! Now who's stupid? Oh wait, i shouldn't be correcting you, you're a Dodge guy, and Dodge KNOWS BEST yo! LOL!
hangguy209 4 years ago
New Civic Type-R: $40,000 0-60: 6.5 seconds
New Evo Lancer: Est. $32,000 0-60 4.5 seconds
2005 SRT-4: $16,500 0-60: 5.3 seconds.
Etc...
Why would someone pay so much money for 197 horsepower? For $40,000 Honda should've turbocharged that Civic.
iTurboSrt4 4 years ago
Dude i think your price list is a bit wrong
Lthaakon 4 years ago
Wrong? So tell me how much a 2007 Civic Type-R costs? Go to the Honda dot com website and tell me how much it costs. Go to the Mitsubishi website and tell me how much an Evo cost. I drive an Srt-4 so I already know that's right.
iTurboSrt4 4 years ago
Correction
New Civic type R: Under 40k
SRT4: 20k
get your facts straight, you're thinking of the Mugen Civic RR, that one is 40k, and pushing at 240HP and will eat the SRT4 anyday, any track. 197 HP? LOL! Kid, that's a Si you're thinking of, the type R pushes 225 HP. So your pricing is wrong. It may not be turbocharged but the Civic itself will eat your SRT4 on circuits anydays.
Turbocharge it = bad reliability.
hangguy209 4 years ago
The Civic Mugen is 197 horses dumbass. THE FASTEST CIVICS HAS 197 horsepower here in the United States. You guys can keep on dreaming about a fast civic but there aren't any! They are economy cars made to save on gas. They put a shiny "R" on them and you kids all think they magically become the fastest car in the world. Don't try to correct me because you end up sounding stupid in the end and my turbo would never lose to a 197 hp Honda!
-Mopar!
iTurboSrt4 4 years ago
Whoever say we were talking about a USDM Mugen Si? DON'T MAKE YOURSELF LOOK STUPID. Type R is not all that, it's just the best you can. Typical American boy do not know what he speaks of, it's a new Civic type R you're talking about, and the one in the video is an EP3-R, older version, not a Si, so who's stupid now? Either way, you could think you can take one type R out with your gas eater backfiring SRT4, but then again, can you beat it in it's game, cornerings?
hangguy209 4 years ago
Bad
TuningMert 4 years ago
nice music :)
silviaslider09 4 years ago
yeh i agree with the guy who said EP3 4 LIFE!!!! im a proud owner myself and i know wat its all about.
plus im guna spray mine from silver to white like the 1 in the video...
wat u think people?? EP3 GEDI
GEDITYPER 4 years ago
yea but even Volkswagen has 75hp models who's speedometer shows top speed 270km. my point is that we are talking about japan!! most of the guys that will buy the car there will remove the top speed limiter and then they will have to change the speedometer with some kind of aftermarket. my 91' 1.5L hatch acn do 200-210km/hr easy and its like 90hp..imagine that monster being left behind by me in the freeway, lol
panoulis20 4 years ago
lol Volkswagen engines suxs they not brake but low power vary sux
StriderRus 4 years ago
hehe.. The Speedometer Shows 180 km... but When You Put the Pedal to the floor.,. the speedometer goes "around" stupid.. If you go around Looking at a Speedometer at a Ferrari it will show 380 km.. It dosent mean that the car will drive that fast.. Stupid
EazYoLE 4 years ago
well if i am stupid then you are a fag.suck a dick and get lost
panoulis20 4 years ago
hehe you Realy are stupid.. Use the brain,before you write or say things ... Stupid
EazYoLE 4 years ago 2
i didnt know youtube was for retarts like you.make sense in your posts before saying bad words for someone you dont even know dickhead.what does "the speedometer goes "around" " mean?the limiter is electronicaly control by the ECU..its not a fucking carb engine like the one you drive
panoulis20 4 years ago
funny..the speedometer shows top speed 180km/hour..lol
panoulis20 4 years ago
That's still almost 130mph. Not slow.
boogeyratt 4 years ago
EP3 4 Life!
flyinryank 4 years ago
bad ass civic! wish they sold them here, teach these fucking ugly ass domestics whos boss.. oops i guess we are already doing that with our regular civics, with that beast we would plain out enbarras them ROFL! eat my rice bitches!
daddyyankee05 4 years ago
perfect type-r
EME43 4 years ago
pure jap porn
civicdohc 4 years ago
i think i done a sex wee in my trunks
civicdohc 4 years ago
ey tetekop gij zij wss nog zo achterlijk om diesel te tanke.ik kan ook nen turbo op ne civic stoempe dan pap ik u ook af ze.maar daar hedde gij me uw piere vestand toch geen besef van.idioot.en daarbij alsk u rechtdoor ni kan molle he dan pak ik u wel in de bochte.rechtdoor rijde kan mijn bomma me hare fiat panda ook tot da der nen bocht komt dan zit ze in de gracht. lekt uwe lollie maar braafkes verder op en ga wa bloemekes plukke in uwe tuin.zeveraar.The only Jezus
TheOnlyJEZUS 4 years ago
my vr6 can kill this shit...fuck honda
terekb 5 years ago
lol, are you sure? a fat ass vr6 with 20 less hp than the type r? not to mention the 1000 hp difference. so yea, keep you VRshit off the hondas, and go race a hyundai
Anacarter 4 years ago
your vr6 can is the fuck :D honda power of dream
EME43 4 years ago
vr6 can go suck my ass, I am vw mechanic and there is no way you can even compare honda is 10 and vw is maybe a 3 when it comes to enginering so don't ever mock honda tell you know. Vw's are good for maybe 2 years then just forget about it my 94 gsr better then anything in vw's line of cars
brettrog1408 4 years ago
i love hondas and want an ep but dont hate on vw. my bro has an 04 gli which has a beautiful recaro interior and a 20 valve turbo 4.
silviaslider09 4 years ago
should be made in japan keeps the jap sleekness to the car + every jap car made outside japan needs to be adjusted with bullshit emmissions so less power...
S2DK 5 years ago
still the best hot hatch on the road
dekruss 5 years ago
It's built in the UK in Honda's factory in Swindon.
cq9yjq 5 years ago
What's the Britain flag doing on the car?
nlty2000 5 years ago
hahahaha fuck yer honda speed all the way boys
fwdvtecs4lyf 5 years ago
civic owns!!!!
darol79 5 years ago
k20a owns all
turbod15 5 years ago
i thought jdm type-r's runs at 220Hp. plus has a weight to power advatange over gti by several 100lbs!
expo2000000 5 years ago
no way, the type r would crap all over the gti, there wouldnt be much competition! whilst the gti reaches top revs and runs out of breath the type r still got a few more revs to go!
if im not mistaking the white type r are the limited edition model!
bigshark45 5 years ago
SEXY BACK! CHYEA!
bonGyaN 5 years ago
dis could be good competition w/ the gti. but if i had to choose, it would be a hard decision.
Htay9000 5 years ago
rice rocket!
risuku13 5 years ago
zomg such an awesome machine
EK9krazy 5 years ago
you musst drive your car on the highway very long on the 240 km/ then stop and biginn again from o always so
jorgehonda 5 years ago
FUCKING SEXY
chunks101 5 years ago
rice is right
sharkey118 5 years ago
i buy my for 26.000 euros
jorgehonda 5 years ago
i have one in black:-) top speed 270 Km/h trust me fast car for 200 hp
jorgehonda 5 years ago