Added: 1 year ago
From: TheAmazingAtheist
Views: 170,838
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (7,685)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • i believe in Allah the All Mighty Creator :)

  • @MrIslamista I believe in the Salad King of North Elenjk. The creator of everything West of the Great invisible strawberry wall.

  • @MrIslamista Sucks to be you I guess.

  • I pray for people like this.

    

  • @MrNitrozone We think for people like you. ;)

  • Congrats, you disproved Christian fundamenalism. FUNDAMENTALISM. And the Bible isn't the only basis of the Christian faith, there's also Sacred Tradition and Oral Tradition.

  • I belive there is a higher power but I don't really have a religion. I don't belive I have to give up time to pray/talk to something that won't respond. I just kinda live life by my own morals.

  • If there was no such thing as religion i BELIEVE you would kill yourself

  • @JackMehoff845 Why?

  • hollow ladies and gentleman

  • it is pointless because most arguments on the topic fail to change the mind of anyone. the atheist will remain an atheist and a Christan will remain a christian.

  • "there either is one or there isn't one", not if quantum mechanics has anything to say about it, just needed to add my two cents.

  • I say this

    "If one thing in a theology is falsified and explained by science, their entire theology fall apart"

  • lol all of the people commenting under this video need to calm the fuck down. Where in this video did he say that he was more intellegent than a religious person JUST because he didnt believe in god? smh he's not bashing the religion he's just being agressive while stating certain facts. He has no reason to sugar coat this topic, so quit getting butthurt and try to take in and process the information he's giving you.

  • I'm an athiest, but we can't disprove god, just like christians can't prove god.

    I wish I knew if god was real or not, but thats impossible.

  • @Holyhellaflyingturd He said we can't disprove A god, but we can disprove the god of a specific religion, like christianity. It's entirely based on a single book, yet that book has huge logical flaws, historical inaccuracies, half of it isn't even meant to be taken literally, so automatically it isn't reliable. There is also evidence against many things it says. SO that means, without a doubt, the christian god does not exist.

  • 6:13-6:45 brilliant man...so true..."I done seen the signs!" hahahaha...dumbass religious idiots

  • Comment removed

  • oh for fucks sake i hate this kind of jumped up,white middle class,intellegentia,"im an atheist therefore im instantly of a higher intelligence than a person of religion" wanker who get on their high horse at any opportunity. im an atheist too but it just makes my skin crawl when you see people like this giving atheists a bad name. plus hes got a face you just want to hit until he could only be identified by his dental records."the amazing atheist"? what a twat.

  • @deathletter69 You're the kind of self-hating atheist that he doesn't like.

  • @deathletter69 Lol, you're british.

  • @98MrTurtle Whats funny about that?

  • @98MrTurtle

    what is wrong with that?

  • @MrGaddafikiller Nothin, Im just jealous ;)

  • Stereotyping religion thats always good, let me ask you something, if you don't believe in god, then why do you spend so much time talking about him? No one truly cares if your an atheist, they care that your bashing a religion that many people believe not only insulting them, but everyone else who believes in a god, now me personally, i could care less what you think, your an atheist thats great nice to meet you, but i still think your arrogant and ignorant to be bashing religion

  • In the christian bible hell is only the separation from God. Which is how I live my life anyway, so why should I care?

  • If you reverse ''shock of god'' name it's way cooler.

    God of shock,fuck yeah.

  • @eye2eyeize Yeah. Sure. You tell 'em.

  • @eye2eyeize

    Caps are for children.

    Also. You're incoherent rambling makes no sense.

  • @thedutchman01 Caps are for men.

  • @eye2eyeize HAHAHAH.

  • @eye2eyeize It would be physically impossible for your post to be any more incoherent and senselessly idiotic. Kindly fuck off and learn punctuation.

  • this should have been a 5 second video that just said. "no"

  • @shadowsangheili That's a very long no.

    More like a "nooooooooooo...."

  • @shadowsangheili Preferable a 5 second video of Robotnik saying "NO!"

  • Gos is real?

    nope just chuck testa :/

    

  • i would be forced to believe in god if this guy ever got laid...that would only be a miracle.

  • lol south parks heaven sucks total balls whilst, south parks hell is fucking awesome

  • SO IS THERE A GOD YES THANKYOU

  • IF THERE ISNT WHY DO U TALK ABOUT HIM SO MUCH GHOST!

  • @eye2eyeize So Harry Potter exists in real life because people talk about him? No.

    Get a life

  • @eye2eyeize He talks about him because he wants to inform the people about how stupid it is to believe in him.

  • '@eye2eyeize cuz people still cant get it through their head that there isn't one

  • @abeeftec

    Did you see the videos ???

  • @blackman6270

    Did you see the videos ???

  • @blackman6270

    Can you watch my favourite videos (( the moon rend - the merical in the mosquito )) and (( ahmed didat from part 1-11 )) and then you will see the proof ...

  • @abeeftec

    Can you see my favourite videos (( ahmed didat from part 1 to 11 )) Plz

  • @abeeftec i cant understand anything from you .. im sorry im not very good at english can you make the words simple for me ? :)

    .. i wont argue with you because im not a religion scientist or something like that ... There are proofs in koran about nature that the koran discoverd it before 1400 years ago and about things that people didn't know it before 1400 years ago ... and the Quran discoverd things that will happen in the future . and many things happened before a short time or befor

  • @Iphone13000 No the Quran didnt discover anything scientist did now 1400 years ago. The muslims are just reinterpreting verses to fit into new findings as respons to the atheist community. The atheist community is burning Christianity (and other religions) good and if Christianity goes down the Islam goes down with it since they share a common basis. So they decided to try and make the Quran part of the evidence against Christianity to prevent them from sharing a common fate.

  • but you are fucker

    n islams god is great and you are just niky fucke real bitch ass hou mett fuck ckoholi

  • @MjnANAnHM Herp a derp a herp

  • @MjnANAnHM stop typing with your face. idiot.

  • @abeeftec

    What do you think about jesus ? you think that jesus is god ?! I want to understand ..

  • @Iphone13000 I KNOW Jesus was who he said he was. The problem with the Koran is that it is wrong in calling Jesus a prophet because the very definition of a prophet proves either the koran is contradictory OR Jesus is who he said he was. To be a Prophet, if one spoken prophesy does not come true he was to be considered a fraud. SO, Either the Koran is wrong, OR Jesus is who he said he is. The Koran calls him a Prophet does it not? he said HE WHO HAS SEEN ME HAS SEEN THE FATHER

  • @abeeftec

    So you didn't beileve of the koran ?? After you saw all those scientific proofs ?!

  • @Iphone13000 I think what you are looking at as PROOFS are not so much proof. It is much speculation. And there is nothing linking evidence for evolution together. They had to change and seperate evolution to make it one part fact, And they say that Micro proves Macro with no reason to really say that. You give me ONE PROOF that evolution is true. Not Speculative evidence which presupposes its true.

  • @abeeftec

    I don't know how to send videos to you But if you want to see my answer to you you should see my favourite videos : the moon rend - the miracle in the mosquito ...

  • @Iphone13000 Unfortunately you cant send them here or even post links. It errors. I have looked into the Koran and though I dont think that anyone liking or disliking how God is has anything to do with whether something is real or not. Unfortunately for THE AMAZING ATHEIST he doesnt understand just because you dont like God, that doesnt mean he doesnt exist. And just because Science says its not likely because of falacies in thinking doesnt mean he isnt the truth.

  • This is exactly how I feel. If god was real and came up to me and said "worship me or go to hell" I'd tell him to fuck off, I'm not going to live an eternity of slavery because some vain spiteful god blackmailed me! The choice is to live in slavery and go to heaven and remain a slave for all eternity or live freely and go to hell and suffer for all eternity. I'd rather have my freedom for the fleeting moment that I can!

  • Comment removed

  • I am god, what you dont believe me, i have more god like properties than the so called god we hear about, at least im real and you can see me. also if i just change my name to god it may help you believe just that little bit more. i am a god you can not disprove. god has no definition so any1 can be god.

  • "Because if you don't believe in god and you're a homophobe, you have to justify your homophobia secular means, and that's a lot harder than saying 'god said so.'"

  • @abeeftec First : There is only ONE god and Second : he dosent have childrens !

    Say: He is Allah, the One!

    Allah, the eternally Besought of all!

    He begetteth not nor was begotten.

    And there is none comparable unto Him.

    quran: sura alakhlass

  • @Iphone13000 Holy scriptures = Bullshit!

  • @Iphone13000 Allah means Contrarywise in arabic Not GOD. It was added to the definition of God because He is supposed to be Contrary to our thinking. That is where the Muslim faith was born. In a LIE.

    And no one said God has children. Not even the Bible. At least not in the real sense that we have children. Jesus WAS GOD in the flesh. He is called the Firstborn amoung the dead which makes him the Firstborn Son of GOD. NOT GODS BIRTHED SON!! If you people only studied.

  • i think i might be agnostic, but i might be agnostic with a open mind, i hope there is an afterlife, a heaven, there actually might be a god, how can we know? we humans aren't truly all that smart, we just believe we are, in the end we could all just be ants and someone with a magnifying glass is looming over us.

  • If there is a God why does it keep crashing my computer during my porn flicks.??

  • @TheJewlya ME GUSTA

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @Chiselnips No, I actually just learned that in school the other day. I saw the MinutePhysics video, and I thought maybe that was how you knew. I didn't expect you to take it so seriously.

  • Just wanted to tell you how sad it is that you have allowed the New Atheist movement to give you that one canned line all you athiests use and with one fatal command they have given you a life long reason to find yourself stareing in the face of God himself wondering why you were so wrong... They have Taught you to say, The Burden of proof is on the believer to PROVE to YOU that God exists and if they cant then you can go on in your life as if there is no God. That has crippled many people!

  • @abeeftec The burden of proof IS on those who make a positive claim.

    Atheism is not a positive claim, atheism is a rejection of a positive claim.

  • @TheGeneralCritic Do you really believe that if there is a God, He cares if you put his creation through peer review? Every learning but never able to come to the knowledge of the truth! You cant see it because you are wise in your own conceits. You believe that God must be judged by you. Creation Proves God. The Universe shows his handiwork! And every scientific discovery proves him MORE.Dont twist up the order of how things work with God. He saves some, Not all.

  • @abeeftec The universe only proves itself; it proves no Prime Mover, no First Cause. These arguments are only convincing to the already convinced.

    500 years of scientific discovery have found no definitive mark of a creator god. And even if it did, which god? Allah? Jehovah? Adonai? Vishnu? Ra? Zeus? The Titans?

  • @TheGeneralCritic Haha, it is the same with you!! When I say that mutation is only proof of itself and is not proof of evolution you would tell me I am wrong that it is!! And I would tell you that you believe mutations are PROOF because you are already convinced evolution is fact.

    And I can tell you that you can know which God is true if you look. But you dont look. You listen to others who you deem profound speakers and you repeat what they say. UNICORNS!

  • @abeeftec My opinion on evolution is not at issue here; at issue here is whether or not there is a God. This is a gigantic red herring.

    The pillars of science could fall to the ground and be left in the dustbin of history and that would still not provide one whit of proof for any god's existence.

    Actually, I'm reading my way through the Bible right now. Not that you asked, because you seem more interested in preaching than having an actual discussion.

  • @TheGeneralCritic Oh yes, Your opinion on evolution IS at issue here. Because it is what you use to refute God. It is the very reason your leaders dismiss God. And believe me your evolution is the gigantic red herring, Nice to see you using Hitchens words. I love it when I see you people repeat him!! it tells me where you are.

    Hey! Dont get stumped on the word UNICORN and let that be a reason to toss the Bible aside! Maybe you should also look into the Bible & not read only!

  • @abeeftec I said I was reading the Bible. I'm not sure what this last passage is supposed to mean.

    I have no leaders, and I have no men to whom I swear any kind of allegiance. Hitchens was a polemic and wrong on the War in Iraq. I've come to atheism by my own ways and through my own mind.

    Don't talk past me, talk to me.

  • @TheGeneralCritic So because Hitchens was against the way in Iraq that means he is all wrong? In fact, I think many of Hitchens arguements for many things were based in Good thought. I just think He saw too much in his life to believe there was a God instead of knowing that all the horror he saw should have caused him to look up to God! Instead he went further, through his ignorance of the Bible, away from it

  • @TheGeneralCritic And you say dont talk past you? Well, dont use canned nonsense you heard from the leaders of the New Atheist movement. Do you know how many times I have had some atheist start with, " the budern of proof blah blah blah" and then in the next post they talk about the RED HERRING?? That comes straight from HITCHENS. So if you dont want me to talk past you, The YOU talk to me instead of using the bull I have heard that so many atheists find profound.

  • @abeeftec If you can't refute my points, that's fine; calling them 'canned' says nothing about the veracity of the points I have made. That's yet another Red Herring and a very subtle Ad Hominem.

  • @TheGeneralCritic Those are not points. They are canned. Saying RED HERRING is from hitchens and has really no basis in this at all. I can refute all of your points. The fact is they have been dealt with so much online there is no point to them. I get tired of answering the same insults by people who say they want to talk yet just spit out things they heard from the 4 horsemen. Those guys lied to you. And you dont even know it.

  • I am not saying Hitchens made it up. I am saying in this discussion HItchens uses it often, which means you listen to him. And if you listen to him i would bet anything that you will use his ridiculousness. But saying God is a red herring doesnt really say anything at all but that you dont believe he exists and since we already know that you dont believe he exists I think saying hes a red herring is just pointless.

  • @abeeftec I didn't say God is a red herring, I said your trying to switch the argument from God to my opinion on evolution is a red herring.

  • @abeeftec A red herring is an argument, given in reply, that does not address the original issue.

    We were talking about God, you tried to switch it over to my opinion of evolution. That had nothing to do with the original issue, so it does indeed qualify as a red herring.

  • @TheGeneralCritic Well then, I mistook what you meant by it and probably everyone else who uses it. But anyway, I didnt try to switch anything. These two arguements go hand in hand because if Evolution is true, And its not, then God cannot be true because it goes against everything the Bible speaks about. And the fact is, That is why the scientific Atheists of our day have removed all of what makes evolution Untrue and changed the definition of it so they can say its true

  • @abeeftec What is evolution? Just humor me.

  • @TheGeneralCritic LOL.Dont even think for a second you are speaking to someone who doesnt know. And also, could I not just google the definition? SO what is even the point in asking that?I have been through this arguement for years.So please,I know this is your way of trying to set me up to say that I dont even know the material so you can get yourself an easy win. hey I know most Christains have no clue what evolution is. And I also know that its definitiion has been changed

  • @abeeftec What was its definition, what is the definition is has been changed into, and what proof do you have of this?

  • @TheGeneralCritic The proof I have is that I know what the definition was while I was in school 30 years ago. And I know that they have changed the definition from full out Macro evolution which was a theory ONLY and needed much more evidence to prove to Micro which IS TRUE!! But I do also know tht Micro does NOT prove macro. It is just a small step to proving it. But you cannot say Micro is true and proves macro therefore macro is true too. 

  • @abeeftec Scientific understanding changes with time. Even if the definition changed, this only proves that the understanding of evolution changed. You need more to prove malice on anybody's part.

    The two process you described are two different aspects the same process. Evolution- micro and macro- is the process by which a species changes over time.

    I do not see how the concept of evolution and the concept of god are mutually exclusive.

  • @TheGeneralCritic Thats because you believe one and not the other. I believe there are changes that take place in man based on where he lives, what he eats, his patterns and you would call that micro evolution and would sware that proves Macro. I do not agree. I think that mans immune system is complex. I think that mutations happen. and if we just stick with mutations alone right now only I can completely disprove with in ten posts that it does not prove nor is it proof of evolution.

  • @abeeftec Macroevolution has been observed in nature.

  • @TheGeneralCritic LOL, You are speaking of something that 1. Has been observed in Plants which are not people. And 2. It does not prove man evolved from a one celled organism. sorry, its a stretch. A BIG stretch.

  • @TheGeneralCritic Also,YES Scientific understanding changes with time. And so does mans understaning of God and the Bible.Yet, the atheists in the scientific community, when they speak of Christains say that they scientific community has been proving christains wrong for so long.Well,Christains never ever claimed they know everything and that they could not be proved wrong about some ancient beliefs in regards to the world or the universe.They do say that you will never prove THERE IS NO GOD!

  • @TheGeneralCritic To put it simply, Atheists do not afford Christains the same latitude they claim for themselves. If a Christain made a claim years ago that the sun stood still for a day. The atheist thinks he has disproven the entire Bible because they proved the earth rotates around the sun. And they keep saying they keep proving biblical claims untrue when the fact is they have not proven a single claim in the bible untrue. They have only proven CHRISTAIN Claims untrue.

  • @abeeftec Let me make this clear, If you can prove beyond a shadow of doubt, That man evolved from a one celled organism, OR that Jesus Christ was not ressurected then you will completly disprove Christianity. Now one of those is possible. But HIGHLY unlikely. You can never disprove the ressurection. In fact, I know there is no way that 11 men would go to their deaths when all they had to do was say they never saw him alive after he was crucified. NO WAY!

  • The finality of death, And the fact that, if they did NOT see Jesus after he was Crucified, ALIVE, then they would surely not die for something they knew to be a hoax now would they? Would you? If all you had to do was say to your executioner,"I never saw that man alive after his crucifixion." and he would spare your life, Would you Go to your death for that lie? I dont think anyone would. The finality of death would stop them certainly. BUT ALL 11? The Ressurection IS A FACT

  • @abeeftec The ressurection is unfortunately not a fact!!! there's only two people in the bible that just maybe saw or met this guy named Jesus!! Several of the texts about Jesus have contradictions, where he was born for an example! the bible or the history about jesus have NO other proofs or evidence that supports it, so stop lying saying it is a fact!!!!

  • @FaceMrCare You are stupid. You have NO ANSWER to what I said so you resort to the JESUS NEVER EXISTED CRAP!

    And why call me a LIAR? You cant handle the fact that you cant disprove what I said so you say he didnt exist! Typical of an atheists arguement!

    And instead of just being like everyone else and SAYING there are contradictions hows about you NAME THEM!! See you cant do that because if you did you would have to deal with me showing why your wrong. you lie to yourself daily

  • @abeeftec You believe a talking snake made a women eat an apple from a tree that god forbid and now you believe everyone has original sin so you have to prove yourself to "god" that your worthy of a second life in heaven....Just wondering if we have original sin does that make us Fucked up creations of god? He was the one who put a fucking talking snake in the world...Where nobody witnessed it...It's all fake bro there MIGHT of been a man named Jesus but not BORN OF THE VIRIGIN MARY one.

  • @Pikintool I believe that it is possible since there is a God. I believe when it speaks of a snake it could also be metaphorical. Either way its not enough to say the Bible isnt true. And I also dont think you understand the importance of this MANNA, There was no apple, that is just how modern translations translated the Bibles word MANNA because manna doesnt exist anymore.

    One thing I DONT Have to do is Prove myself to God. That is one of your many misconceptions about God

  • @Pikintool And of COURSE you people always deny Jesus existed any time a Christain says anything you cant explain or you have no rebuttle for! Its funny to watch you all argue without ever saying that as if Jesus was here and as soon as a Christain stumps you you turn to the Jesus never existed speach.

    Everything is not as it appears buddy. Maybe you need to stop listening to other people who seem smart to you and check things out for yourself. I see you are following ideas

  • @abeeftec I didn't deny the exsistense of him I deny how he rose from the dead and this sin crap blah blah blah.Because if Jesus can be risen from the dead why can't my grandparents that were taken away from me? hmm explain this aren't all of gods children important?

  • @Pikintool All Gods children are important. But not everyone is Gods Children. Some people are of their God the Devil. Even if you follow your own way you are considered a child of satan simply because you dont follow God and Satan is the Author of the lie the world is believing right now that there is no God. As time has went on The BLINDNESS to those who perish has fit the times. It needed to be more powerful as time goes on but make no mistake. People didnt believe even long ago

  • @abeeftec Now let me make something very clear to you that obviously you do not see. Your Grandparents, If they were believers. Or let me make this even clearer, IF GOD SHOWED THEM FAVOR, then you will see them again, IF he shows you favor!

    Why are you worried about Gods ways of dealing with another person? Why are you not worried with how he will deal with you?

    Blaming God because man is set on a negative pole will not help you to understand him any better.

  • @abeeftec you call me stupid, what the hell are you then? I said you're lying if you say that the story of Jesus is an absolute fact,which it is not at all, because of all the uncertainty about the lyrics! then claiming that I can't disprove that Jesus was alive, have you heard of something called the burden of the proof?and finally,you say I can't mention contradictions about the stories of Jesus,but I told you that in the New Testament Jesus is apparently born in two different cities dumbass!

  • @FaceMrCare It is an absolute fact. No one denies that Jesus walked this earth. No one denies that Jesus was crucified. NOT A SINGLE HISTORIAN would deny that.

    Our freaken CALANDER is BASED on his time here on earth!!

    The burden of proof is that we KNOW Jesus lived and died on the cross. Thats historic FACT just as much as George Washington is. It doesnt say he was BORN in two different cities. It says LIVED IN one and BORN in the other. You just dont get it.

  • @abeeftec Just as you said about me, You take Micro evolution as PROOF of mans evolution simply because you already believe evolution because you do not believe we were created by any Being. You already believe evolution and therefore you cannot see that what you accused me of, you do the same thing with evolution.

  • @TheGeneralCritic First thing, You need not worry about all the other religions. Why is Christainity Correct? You could give me how everyone says their religions is correct. But that would be one of those typical responses again. How about lets see WHY it is correct. First off, It partially is just like all the other religions when people get ahold of it and worship God their way. But it has so many differences that so many get so messed up all of the time.

  • The burden of Proof IS on those who make claims IN THE SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY THROUGH PEER REVIEW!! This is NOT your scientific community buddy! God transcends your scientific community! And what if God doesnt want to be burdened with showing you he exists? What if he lets you perish? I am NOT saying he is going to let that happen. But if you dont seek the truth and stop listening to people who tell you what to say to Christains you will never see the truth

  • No, the burden of proof is on those who make claims, no matter where they are.

    To put it simply: I am not disbelieving God, I'm disbelieving YOU.

    If He exists, if He is who you say He is, God knows where I am, he knows my mind, he knows what it would take to get me to believe in him.

  • @TheGeneralCritic Haha, Talk to JESUS and the jews from thousands of years ago then! But since you cant, Maybe you should look into this yourself. And stop saying over and over to people who speak to you that its THEIR CLAIM. If you came to me with some Scientists claims I would want to speak to the source. I would not tell YOU To prove it because you came to me telling me about it. In the same way, Stop telling Christains they are burdened to prove this to you. GODS YOUR GUY!

  • @abeeftec Then here I am. I've been here for 26 years, he know my mind, he know what it would take to get to believe.

    Here I am. And I'm still waiting.

  • When you get to that part in the Bible about John the Baptists father being told by an ANGEL that he was going to have a son. Please dont just read over it. Think to yourself how it is that if someone was trying to FOOL someone in that book, Why on earth would they write that Johns father asked the angel to PROVE HE WAS FROM GOD! Why would anyone need an ANGEL to Prove any claim they make? Should show you that some people cant be convinced no matter what they are shown.

  • @abeeftec How do you know the story is true in the first place?

  • @TheGeneralCritic Which story? 

  • @abeeftec That an angel came to Joseph.

  • Got News for you Mr. Atheist. The burden of proof is NOT on People of Faith for YOU to Find your place with God!! The burden is on God! And God alone! So you can laugh joke think you are smart all you want but the fact of the matter is, The bible clearly states In Romans Chapter 1 that you are WITHOUT EXCUSE!! So the only burden on a believer is to tell you about Christ! It is GODS BURDEN to actually grant you repentance.God Resists the proud and gives GRACE to the humble! Gettcha some!

  • @abeeftec The people who believe in God must show the proof, if you can't, then you're just bullshitting us. Show me proof that God exists, but if he's real and like anything in bible, I still wouldn't want to worship him. So fuck him, I'd rather go to hell.

  • @stefanoGFsiciliano Is that so? You would rather go to hell? You saying that is just like your tough guy superior talk online. You would run your mouth to anyone online and talk about how you would say it to their face. But then when that time comes you wouldnt have a thing to say. Im sure you would want to go to hell.

  • @abeeftec If the bible is true, and Christianity is right (despite the countless numbers of religions that have come before it) than heaven will be full of God worshiping idiots like the majority of people in america. That is hell. Their is no heaven for me. If anything hell is going to be just like the earth right now. I'd rather not exist after I die. I want that choice, although I wouldn't mind living another life either. If God is real, I do not wish to worship him or Jesus Christ.

  • @stefanoGFsiciliano That is just a pure ignorant statement. I can tell you that God is real, Jesus was GOD in the flesh. He is actually exactly what you would want God to do to prove he exists. The sad thing is that your stance is most peoples stance and was mine. I used to think, Worship? Come on! Why would you want people bowing to you? It used to drive me crazy. But then I started thinking about the arrogance of that. And I had to rethink my position on it. he deserves it!

  • @abeeftec Where is the proof? Besides, even if their is a God I still wouldn't care. The human race is pathetic, I know we won't change. I no longer care what happens to us. We can argue all we want, but we're stuck on this little world and one day we as a species will no longer exist because of it. So as for the human race, we're simply fucked unless some willing E.T's can help us sort out this mess. Nah, their probably just looking down at us for laughs.

  • @stefanoGFsiciliano Why are you waiting for the human race to change? seems to me that you already agree with the Bible in that regard. We wont change!! EVER! Unless God does the changing! trust me, that little tug inside your head that makes you self serve when you think no one will notice, That, the Bible says, IS the problem! And we will never get rid of that. So you already agree with what God says about man. What Proof are you looking for?

  • @abeeftec God does the changing? No, people do the changing. Has god helped us the past few thousand years? No. God didn't build what we have today, and he won't ensure our continued survival in the future. I personally think the bible is bullshit just like all the other holy text in the world. If I had once chance to push religion and God of the cliff I would.

  • @stefanoGFsiciliano Believe me I am a rock solid hard head and only God could have done the changing in me. And I didnt say God built what we have today. But to think he didnt give the resources is shorting. Also, To think what we have created is something is to worship, Yes WORSHIP, things created by created man. The Bible is much different then the other writings. Why do you think our survival has lasted this long? other planets are pummled with all sorts of debris.

  • @abeeftec Well I'd like to stay the way I am. I don't need a deity. We've only been here 2 million years and our species has been showing signs of struggle since the first civilizations. The dinosaurs reigned 159 million years and where far off better. All they needed was to follow the simple rule of eat or be eaten. Sentient beings just make everything difficult and don't last very long. I think that the majority of life in the universe is not sentient for this reason.

  • Lol, aren't all theists EX-atheists?

  • @kamy2425 Errm... no.

  • Damn you, Amazing Atheist. I was going to do a video mocking your atheism because, well, that's what I do. But upon watching this video for research, I find this to be the most reasonable discussion any atheist has made. I believe in God, accept the divinity of Christ, but do not call myself a Christian. I rather like the Rastafarian perception of Christ. Anyway, don't make the Phelpsian assholes the ambassadors for the faith. There are Christians out there you might actually dig, man.

  • @Chiselnips Did someone see the MinutePhysics video?

  • Cute video, pal. I disproved atheism in one of my videos. Check out my channel. It wasn't hard. Piece o' cake, actually. The philosophy of naturalism is unfalsifiable, 'cos it's based on a circular argument, but don't expect atheists to understand that. I can debunk Russell's Teapot, FSM (*yawn*), and the invisible pink unicorn drivel ("invalid association with an accepted absurdity"). Empiricism cracks me up though: how do you prove empiricism empirically? I'll leave that one with you, buddy.

  • @The1066Al

    Atheism is not tied to naturalism, empiricism, or any other -ism.

    Atheism is one answer to one question: is there a god or gods? If you answer anything other than 'yes', you're an atheist (a- meaning without, theism meaning belief in god)

  • @TheGeneralCritic That argument would be true if "God" (i.e. intelligent first cause of the universe) were a trivial idea with no implications for our view of reality. But "God" is, by definition, not a trivial concept, and therefore the denial of this concept has implications for what we believe about reality. If that is not the case, then I suppose it's possible to have an "atheist" who believes in an intelligent eternal personal creator of life?? I think not, somehow...

  • @The1066Al Yes, you can have an atheist who believes in an intelligent eternal personal creator of life.

    Life could have been created by a species of immortal aliens who speak to us through our dreams. This origin meets all the above criteria (intelligent, eternal, personal, creator of life) without appealing to any supernatural notions.

  • @TheGeneralCritic Then I guess that those immortal aliens would collectively qualify as "God". But how would they not be supernatural? If they were not, then they would be simply the result of nature themselves, and therefore you would simply be putting the problem back one step, because you still have the problem of how material nature creates life - and that is a position on which there is a burden of proof.

  • @The1066Al Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.

    Any sufficiently explained magic is indistinguishable from science.

    Currently, science has no concrete explanation for abiogenesis. However, 'We don't yet know' is a more intellectually honest answer than 'We don't know but we're going to act like we have an answer'. However, the Miller-Urey experiment points to a promising lead on how amino acids could have formed from inorganic life on early Earth.

  • @The1066Al Fail. Not even worth responding to.

  • @Halo1nReverse Probably because you can't.

  • Anarchism!!!! 

  • Well, not all atheists see life in a more valuable light. Some just see it as a meaningless, painful anomaly in a vast ocean of nothingness. This could demotivate someone just as much as the Christian who does nothing because they see the world as pre-condemned from what they believe to be prophecy from the Book of Revelations.

  • @ronaldcorreatv Well, I think there is value in chastity. A lot of people get into bad, incompatible relationships because they want to rush things.This possibly leads to less fulfilling sex and ultimately a less fulfilling life.

  • @Chiselnips You don't really exist. Rather it is just a combination of a bunch of cells.

  • Shockofnothing

  • It's a good thing you're a shit person. That way you won't have to worry about heaven.

  • Prove atheism as true? Easy. Theism and atheism are the opposite. Theism is following a religion and most of the time believing in a God, and atheism is not following a religion and not believing in a God. They are opposites. Atheism = not(theism). By all logic, proving one as false makes the other one true because they are opposites, even in electrical logic. 1 = true, 0 = false. If theism is proven false (0), then atheism = not(theism) or (1). And theism has been proven as false. I win.

  • Your actually so bloody cool. Not joking =] <3

  • @armelix73 so all Christians and Muslims don't allow any body to have a say? That's not true. You can't bunch up all Christians by the stereotypical fundamentalist beliefs. I respect other people's believes, even atheists. But I have my own faith and opinions.

  • Did this merciful loving God only appear to white christian? Is there any record of him appearing to Indians, Chinese, African, just to name a few? I used to pray and thank God. Now I pray and thank the universe for each glorious day that I am obeying our common laws. Jesus was a smart MAN who tried to show what can happen when we wrongly interact with each other which is nature. You reap what you sow

  • @theamazingatheist

    Why do you contradict yourself, "There is no God, if the is a God it isn't the Christian God, if it is the Christian God," you pretty much destroy all support of your argument right there. How can you walk outside, see the trees, the sky, the stars, and say that it just happened by chance. You see coincidence, I see intelligent design, I just don't see how you can believe that.

  • @lyonsswag how can you walk outside, see people starving and suffering, them beeing brutalised, raped and murdered, diseases that painfully take the lives of children and say it's "intelligent" design?!? ..."i just don't see how you can believe that"!!!!

  • @lyonsswag You're misinterpreting the quote. They are all separate points, not all one statement. He said ALMOST CERTAINLY not the Christian God. He then said IF (low chance) it is the Christian God... (stuff here that disproves Christian God). Also, intelligent design has been disproved. You need to know two shits about science, physics and chemistry in particular. Also, cancer, Rubisco, and the extinction of 99.9% of all species ever alive aren't intelligently designed.

  • @lyonsswag Learn some thermodynamics (especially with some focus on entropy) and evolution.