Novel idea that Chrysler had, but I'm glad it never "took off". The gas mileage and maintenance costs would economically cripple most people. It is still nice to see a piece of history that still runs.
@loufalce I believe the same person did the styling for both, then the bodies were built in Italy by Ghia in I believe Turin. One of my auto instructors took one for a shoert drive in the late '60s at a chrysler open house back when he worked for them. He said it was nice..
Build a turbine-electric hybrid...turbine wouldn't have to spin at such outrageous RPMs, and the temps in the hot section would take care of most pollution issues.
Something bizarre from the Wiki page: "The engine would run on virtually anything and the president of Mexico tested this theory by running one of the first cars—successfully—on tequila."
What's the top speed? I can't imagine that thing being able to get out of the way of people in a rush. I'm about to install oil slick dispensers on the back of my 72 Beetle to get people off my back when the light turns green.
I don't remember what the top speed on them is but it's really not too bad. I rode in the one that is at the St. Louis Museum of Transportation a few years back at the Monster Mopar Weekend and they really ain't all that slow off the line. I was thoroughly impressed.
As I recall, Chrysler back in the day touted the performance as being comparable to a 200-something horsepower V8. I should expect it'd move out quite well, particularly developing 100% of its torque (at the power turbine) at 0rpm.
Man, I'd love to go for a scoot in one, someday! Such a unique and somehow beautiful car (while simultaneously being butt-ugly... Ghia at it's best!).
C'mon... it's a V-dub! By its nature, it already has oil dispensers!
Kidding - I have a '74 1303S for a daily driver myself. The stinger seems pretty effective at keeping the idiots off my ass. Perhaps it's because a couple of good raps of the throttle will produce a nice backfire? Or at least leave a black smudge on their bumper/grille. Considering a flamethrower for it...
Trust me I know, my daily drive for the work was about 60 miles. I'd have to add two quarts a week, we changed the seals and it still leaks. We are thinking the oil cooler is shot internally.
We're getting off-topic... but probably need to split and re-seal the case (there's only one main seal, by the way - the pulley [rear] uses a 'scroll' seal and slinger).
Most all of the 50-60 1963 Turbine Cars were indeed crushed but about a dozen survived. Many are non-running examples but there are still a few running and driving cars. The ones owned by the Museum of Transportation and at least one of the ones still owned by Chrysler (the one in this video) are two that run and drive.
I signed up in 1963 to be chosen to drive one of these cars. Chrysler decided on how to apportion the cars to the public, based on driving habits, number of miles driven, etc.
Unfortunately, I was not chosen. I forget how many cars there were in the fleet. Before this, they had a turbine in a 54 Plymouth! :) Jack
but two questions: is the turbine (very) loud, especially when accelerating? and - if not - how did they manage to quiet the sound down? you know that?
I'm not exactly sure what all the exhaust consisted of but the car really isn't that loud. There's a little bit of a muffled turbine roar as the car accelerates away from you. It really is amazing. This was over 40 years ago that these cars were built. It's a shame that the technology wasn't developed further.
It consumes fuel like a helicopter - which means several gallons an hour, no matter how much you drive. Which means especially in cities you would get atrocious mileage. With todays gas prices, unless you're very rich you coudln't afford it.
I have some more footage of the Turbine Car that is owned by the Museum Of Transportation in St. Louis around here somewhere. That footage is in-car footage I shot riding in the back seat of the car at Gateway International Raceway a few years back. That was really cool and something I'll never forget. I'll have to post that footage when I run across it.
Novel idea that Chrysler had, but I'm glad it never "took off". The gas mileage and maintenance costs would economically cripple most people. It is still nice to see a piece of history that still runs.
greasemonkey981 1 month ago
Why do Americans pronounce it "turban" ? (rather than turb*i*ne)
BaddaBigBoom 2 months ago
Yes! This is history.
malcauskas7 7 months ago
Great looking and sounding car!
BrentAudi 11 months ago
Front end looks like the back of a 1961-1963 T Bird, but thats not bad.
loufalce 11 months ago 2
@loufalce I believe the same person did the styling for both, then the bodies were built in Italy by Ghia in I believe Turin. One of my auto instructors took one for a shoert drive in the late '60s at a chrysler open house back when he worked for them. He said it was nice..
Oldbmwr100rs 10 months ago
BATMOBILEHAIRDRYER
197022007 1 year ago
Build a turbine-electric hybrid...turbine wouldn't have to spin at such outrageous RPMs, and the temps in the hot section would take care of most pollution issues.
pheenix42 1 year ago
Something bizarre from the Wiki page: "The engine would run on virtually anything and the president of Mexico tested this theory by running one of the first cars—successfully—on tequila."
kasteman1 1 year ago
Cool
BeetleBerlin 1 year ago
reminds me of the jetsons!!..it think its awsome, engine courld run on aything i looked it up on wiki...
willem01 1 year ago
From a time in America when we were allowed to believes in ourselves.
The6000Sabre 1 year ago
sounds like a ufo.
Account6879 2 years ago
lol ya, but ufo's do not exist
airlinesss 2 years ago
Man that's loud!
ObiTrev 2 years ago
What's the top speed? I can't imagine that thing being able to get out of the way of people in a rush. I'm about to install oil slick dispensers on the back of my 72 Beetle to get people off my back when the light turns green.
Corollaboi 2 years ago
I don't remember what the top speed on them is but it's really not too bad. I rode in the one that is at the St. Louis Museum of Transportation a few years back at the Monster Mopar Weekend and they really ain't all that slow off the line. I was thoroughly impressed.
OneBadSuperbird 2 years ago
As I recall, Chrysler back in the day touted the performance as being comparable to a 200-something horsepower V8. I should expect it'd move out quite well, particularly developing 100% of its torque (at the power turbine) at 0rpm.
Man, I'd love to go for a scoot in one, someday! Such a unique and somehow beautiful car (while simultaneously being butt-ugly... Ghia at it's best!).
Alisterwolf66 2 years ago 2
C'mon... it's a V-dub! By its nature, it already has oil dispensers!
Kidding - I have a '74 1303S for a daily driver myself. The stinger seems pretty effective at keeping the idiots off my ass. Perhaps it's because a couple of good raps of the throttle will produce a nice backfire? Or at least leave a black smudge on their bumper/grille. Considering a flamethrower for it...
Alisterwolf66 2 years ago
Trust me I know, my daily drive for the work was about 60 miles. I'd have to add two quarts a week, we changed the seals and it still leaks. We are thinking the oil cooler is shot internally.
Corollaboi 2 years ago
Ouch. Which seals did you change? Get the flywheel O-ring (and gasket) in addition to the front main?
Sounds like it use a complete gasket set. Good thing they're cheap, huh?
Alisterwolf66 2 years ago
We changed all seals, push rods oil cooler front seal, main seal etc. Everything that came in the kit we used.
Corollaboi 2 years ago
We're getting off-topic... but probably need to split and re-seal the case (there's only one main seal, by the way - the pulley [rear] uses a 'scroll' seal and slinger).
Alisterwolf66 2 years ago
looks kinda like a t-bird
TeeBeeBad63 2 years ago
designed by the same guy
BlacKJesu5 2 years ago
how bout' this? how bout' this? you sounded like Robert Deniro for a second there. ;P
piper4seeformerly 3 years ago
Waaaay cool!
bagelboi66 3 years ago
Interesting -
GenericGene 3 years ago
Who was that driving. Get Smart?
Jprojasw 3 years ago
Maxwell Smart.
iunnox666 3 years ago
i thought they were all crushed ???
vcval 3 years ago
Most all of the 50-60 1963 Turbine Cars were indeed crushed but about a dozen survived. Many are non-running examples but there are still a few running and driving cars. The ones owned by the Museum of Transportation and at least one of the ones still owned by Chrysler (the one in this video) are two that run and drive.
OneBadSuperbird 3 years ago
wow they are lovley and with running onalmost anything maybe they should look at turbine insted of hydrogen
hydrogen = good as a fuel
hydrogen = used to make electricty stupid and a waste
vcval 3 years ago 2
@OneBadSuperbird
why were they crushed :(?
MainVuper 4 months ago
They were crused and used to make oil drills for the Middle East! LMFAO!
phileagfan 3 years ago
@vcval One is also owned by Jay Leno
tomuss94 1 year ago
I signed up in 1963 to be chosen to drive one of these cars. Chrysler decided on how to apportion the cars to the public, based on driving habits, number of miles driven, etc.
Unfortunately, I was not chosen. I forget how many cars there were in the fleet. Before this, they had a turbine in a 54 Plymouth! :) Jack
raconter1 4 years ago
sounds like a blow dryer :o
RobbieStott 4 years ago
the sound of the turbine is SOO incredible!
but two questions: is the turbine (very) loud, especially when accelerating? and - if not - how did they manage to quiet the sound down? you know that?
thanks in advance, jonas
CarHunter 4 years ago
I'm not exactly sure what all the exhaust consisted of but the car really isn't that loud. There's a little bit of a muffled turbine roar as the car accelerates away from you. It really is amazing. This was over 40 years ago that these cars were built. It's a shame that the technology wasn't developed further.
OneBadSuperbird 4 years ago 3
@OneBadSuperbird
It consumes fuel like a helicopter - which means several gallons an hour, no matter how much you drive. Which means especially in cities you would get atrocious mileage. With todays gas prices, unless you're very rich you coudln't afford it.
52111centrumcz 7 months ago
@CarHunter In those days everyone automatically knew if a car said "Chrysler"
on it, it was going to be NOISY.
"Q U I E T" wasn't even in Chrysler engineers' vocabulary.
Chryslers had power and handling, but I never drove one, (including brand new),
that you didn't hear engine, wind and road noise from idle getting progressively
worse up to turnpike speeds.
At 80mph, (in those days the speed limit), you almost needed EAR PLUGS.
So a roaring, whining turbine might have masked some rattles!
GooglFascists 7 months ago
First one I have ever seen driving around. What a piece of automotive history.
L324RT12 4 years ago
I have some more footage of the Turbine Car that is owned by the Museum Of Transportation in St. Louis around here somewhere. That footage is in-car footage I shot riding in the back seat of the car at Gateway International Raceway a few years back. That was really cool and something I'll never forget. I'll have to post that footage when I run across it.
OneBadSuperbird 4 years ago
The coolest car ever made.
robmck52 4 years ago
I agree, there is a movie from 1964 called "The Lively Set" that features the car in it. Check it out.
1alien2 3 years ago