Added: 4 years ago
From: hurtinator
Views: 66,425
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (52)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Jane is at a table in the background!

  • awesome

  • You are half right, Hitchcock is only credited with the technique whereas his German cameraman is the one who came up with the vertigo camera technique.

  • @Mangani245 What for? Hitchcock came up with it!!

  • @JustJokingYou It's a reference to a shot from "Jaws".

  • @jimbobago Yeah, but Hitch invented it. You should have said "Hitchcock would be proud." But either way, it's your comment, do with it what you like...

  • @JustJokingYou Agreed!!!! :P

  • @JustJokingYou

    Look, the 'technique' was from Vertigo but the actual 'shot' is from Jaws.

    Hitchcock never used this technique zooming right into a character's face. James Stewart was never IN the shot in Vertigo.

    In Jaws the shot zooms right into Roy Schieder's face, keeping HIM as the focus of the shot.

    The 'shot' should be called the 'Jaws shot' even though the technique is from Vertigo.

    Is this Lego man emulating a shot in Vertigo or Jaws? It's Jaws.

  • @LaughingGravy31 Yeah but everywhere you look its called the HITCHCOCK shot. He was the one who created it. Speilberg just made an alteration of it...

  • @JustJokingYou

    No Hitchcock created the camera 'technique' but not the actual 'shot'..

    The actual SHOT and usage of the actor's face being the focal point for shock and awe was first used by Steven Spielberg in Jaws.

    This 'shot' should technically be called 'The Jaws shot'.

    This Lego man shot is copying the Jaws shot, not the Vertigo shot. There were no humans actors in the Vertigo shot.

  • seems someone is posting using my name so this is a test to see if someone has breached my account.

  • @hurtinator Now can you put the camera, the subject, and the backdrop all on a Lego Mindstorms apparatus and have it automate the shot at the push of a button? ;)

  • @Mangani245 I agree with morris7453, Spielberg and Scheider had nothing to do with the creation of this technique, Alfred Hitchcock would be the proud one

  • @fulthrottle68

    Spielberg and Scheider have EVERYTHING to do with the creation of this particular 'shot'.

    Do you know the difference between 'technique' and actual 'shot'?

    In Vertigo and Marnie the reverse zoom was focused on the distance and did not focus in on a main character's face. It's the Jaws 'shot' which is endlessly imitated.

    Hitchcock used it as a visual effect. Jaws used it as a characterisation.

  • @LaughingGravy31 Alright, I'll give you that. One thing though, I don't even remember writing that comment, and it was also 9 months ago so you win.

  • @fulthrottle68

    No worries. I just get niggled when the actual 'shot' (i.e the dolly zoom onto a character's face to amplify shock or awe etc etc) is called the 'Vertigo/Hitchcock shot'.

  • Called a 'trombone shot'

  • @mediamonkeymovies Called a 'Stretch Shot'. Called a 'Vertigo effect'. Called a 'Push-Pull effect'. Called a 'Retrograde Zoom', a 'Smash Shot', a 'Contra-Zoom'. Different Directors call it different things. Look up "Dolly Zoom" on Wikipedia, and learn something.

  • @Ayelis

    so you know everything do you?? Also called a trombone shot - get a life!

  • @Ayelis

    Oh and if you DO look it up on wikipedia, there it is - called 'The trombone effect' - 15th one listed. No one person knows everything - don't be so obnoxious

  • @Mangani245 What about Hitchcock? You know, the guy who invented this movement..?

  • how do you do these animation things pleace tell me

  • @KaizVideos the dolly in which the camera is mounted on is pulled back as the camera lens zooms in on the foreground subject in this case the lego guy. it can also be achieved the other way where the dolly moves forward as the camera lens zooms out on the foreground subject. with those two zooming effects you get this effect which is also called the vertigo effect adopted in the classic film vertigo when they do the zooming effects of the stairwell.

  • you moved the lego man! thats cheating! xD

  • dolly zoom?

  • The size of the subject does not have to be maintained. See: Jaws, or any other that chooses to change the size of the subject.

  • wow, what a dick.

  • jesus, baddmanaz, did you have to pay to get in or something?

  • @baddmanaz  unfortunately you're retarded.

  • this is so hard! i've tried it myself and i have a lot of trouble getting the zoom and the dolly backward to be the same speed. the zoom is also always a little jerky.

  • not bad. well done!

  • An easier way to do this is to just move it back a bit each frame, then handle the zoom in post pro. Most of the time, for a stop motion shot like that, you can just use a normal camera, which should capture at more than enough resolution for the footage to not become blurred when you zoom in.

  • this is eigendlich lighter effekt, for me at least, but I have learnt him from kameraman ... and I must say: I seldom see clips where he is so good as this. sry for my bad english but i cant speak english verry good.

  • You dont say..

  • Makes you wonder if Hitchcock would have smiled at a test like this. Thanks for sharing.

  • i love LOVE this effect!

  • this looks hard to do

  • its pretty simple you've got to zoom in to a picture that suits you. then you've got to move the camera in towards the subject while zooming out at the same time, just make sure you do it at the same speed.

    think of it as two cars on each side of the road going at the same speed going past eachother

  • picky

  • It's mostly down to limitations in what you can do at lego scale. Moving the camera a millimetre at a time for the dolly, then trying to match the zoom to get the guy to stay the exact same size was just about impossible, so I allowed a little scaling to keep it looking smooth.

  • I did it with a camcorder once, but it's really hard to keep the zoom and camera movement at the same speed. Each time, the dolly zoom only lasted a few seconds.

  • Since you're on such a small scale, you're not going to get a lot of actual "depth of field" out of your dolly-zoom. To make it work, you might want to consider ACTUALLY compressing your depth of field. They're legos.. so for the long shot, put your background far back, and your minifig in middle, then do your camera trick, but "help it along" by progressively moving the minifig closer to the background.

  • I have been playing around with Contra zooms in animation before, and it is pretty tricky to get right. Nice attempt though, it's looking good.

  • Nice, better than wikipedias version ;)

  • Hate to say it but you need to move the camera 1mm at at time to get a smoot result. However that was a cool effect, you can see it coming together. I have never seen anyone use the Hitchcock style zoom in a brickfilm before, it will work nicely and be a first ! (I think)

  • Have you reposted this ? - As it is really smooth now. Looks like you have cracked it, it looks great.

  • Exactly the same as before. Maybe you had a rough connection or something.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more