So has anyone seen how the yanks really discovered this in the Persian Gulf years ago with their HAARP! A witness filmed a bit of it... Check out 'HAARP in Iran' I think it's called
Video rất là hay một thí nghiệm thông minh. Tôi ước gì được là một nhà khoa học phát minh ra các rô-bốt giúp đỡ con người vào những công việc nguy hiểm ^^
A grant from the government...phhhffft ya right! I hope he does, but the chances are the government will want to buy it and stick on a shelf, and well never see it or hear about it again.
And what is the frequency(range) to separate hydrogen and oxygen? With more knowledge we could build those generators and try it out ourselves. Or is is just a hoax?
@mtssvnsn Please don't fall into a mental trap. Think of it this way - “The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he can’t believe he exists” ~~~ J. Edgar Hoover ~ 33E Scottish Rite, Grand Cross, Director of the FBI and Warren Commission.
Future plans suggest drivers will be tax on the per mile basis regardless of fuel source via a special GPS system. This is why you are starting to see greater acceptance of alternative technologies begin to rise. The good news is that you won't pollute the environment which may improve health but their is no escaping the power players.
It sure could impact the entire world...What's the difference between the salt water in that test tube on fire...or the whole ocean? Let's just pray there's no way to do that from space on any of our oceans.
No laws broken in physics here, just an easier more effecient way to access the hydrogen in water, which is great, beacause we are alwasys told it take more energy than what it can produce. Thats bull. Water as fuel is totally viable if cracked effeciently. There are many low powered tricks to break that bond instead of great amounts raw power to crack water. 13.56 mhz 9.26 mhz
hydrogen is the fuel and you can crack water easily with much less energy than your told. No overunity proven, just an effecient way to access hydrogen for fuel.
Well I guess there's your chance to become a billionaire! The world uses over 100M lbs of hydrogen a year, most of it coming from hydrocarbon reductions. With your expertise in extracting it cheaply you should be a billionaire many times over in a matter of months.
Yes. Laws is written by men, men has limited point of views, therefore the laws can only apply to certain area, not all. REMEMBER! all invention start with breaking some wellknown laws. How many time of human change and update the laws in the past 100 years? there was a lot, and there will not end just now, it will keeps changing, and keep improving.
Please check a news from BBC back to May 2002, title "Laws of physics 'may change'", and please read it you will surprise how little we know the universe. If you think we have already know every laws of physics, think again.
Nothing I wrote implies I think we have found all the laws of physics. I simply stated the "laws" we currently have are based on the most fundamental of observations.
And as these videos are proof of, news broadcasts are hardly the source you want to quote when discussing science.
Okay, I found the article you mentioned plus others and I noticed two things.
1. Their discussing laws of nature which are typically things like constants (pi, c, etc), not laws of physics are based on more interaction.
2. The method of presentation. These videos show no evidence and basically claim they might have invalidated everything we know of physics. BBC group shows lots of evidence and then explains in detail that it's not proven yet and what more is needed.
Ever hear of anti gravity? Not possible, broken all time by silent craft floating around. A nuke is an overunity weapon. You know it, I know it. What the fark do we know? WE Don't know shit. You act like the authority on the subject, you don't know shit. You only know what you been told, you ever do anything experimental? or do you just blab your pesimestic pie hole all day long in this forum? Deventurd and Buttnuggets act like farken shills.
Actually nukes are horribly inefficient weapons, far from being overunity. That majority of fissible material is unreacted during the process.
You provide a detailed procedure for any over-unity reaction/process and I'll gladly set-up the experiment, setting up laboratory work is what I do for a living, been in the business for almost 20 years.
Those laws mean nothing because we act as if we know everything, when we clearly only know one billionth one one percent of the mysteries of the Universe!
That pretty much just means theres more laws to write, not that those discovered are invalid. Laws in science are based on the most basic of observations. If you had even a minor understanding of them you'd be more like "Duh, why did they even bother to state that it's so obvious".
Gov Grant?????This guy needs 24 hour protection from the Gov. You have to have a death wish to invent something thats going to challenge big oil. They (oil) poisoned the poor bastard that invented the water powered engine. This guy is next if he isn't careful.Screw the patents, he needs to go live voyercam worldwide 24/7 so if he does get offed his secrets dont die w/him and big oil doesn't buy the pattents and lose'em.
Lets put a bucket of salt water in there and see if you get plasma with same amount of power used. Hmmmm I can see this as an overunity device. Excited hydrogen, reverses spin of H electron creating the GR vortex with alows magnetism to be converted to plasma. Notice how little water or salt is burned in the process.
Conservation of energy (lol). "laws of physics as we know them today" - like this law could be overturned! The universe could not exist if "free" energy could be produced. And temperature is an intensive property - you can raise the temperature of a very small bit of matter very high with very little energy.
The law of the conservation of energy is not in question in this case because mass could be sacrificed in a chemical reaction. A small amount of energy in the form of radio waves would merely provide a means of producing hydrogen witch in turn is burned for more energy than it takes to produce the radio waves. This is not some perpetual motion machine because a complex chemical reaction is present.
it works because the sodium chloride weakens the bond between the hydrogen and the oxygen, the radio waves break the hydrogen free, and it burns, the hydrogen is burning, not the water, check it out at popsci. the problem is that the radio generator takes up more energy than the fire produces, so it isnt that efficient
No its not real, thats why at the end of these news stories, salt water fire, water torch, if you notice, say they are working with the Defense Dept. now. hmmmmmm Congradulations boys, your in the club, now keep your mouth shut, errr else, but hey, we give you a job. This is what happens when people have a valid cliam that easily demonstates over unity.
the reason water wiull never work is because iut goes agaistn the law of physics...its a modern galilieo..this guy isnt the first to discover this...sadly it doesnt mattter scientists won't accept water fuel casue they believe it takes more energy to burn it then the ammount of energy it produces
We better believe it this time! Many discoveries ahead of its times are usually shelved, and we have plenty of those. Why!?..Fundamental flaw of individual central point of view of interest.Political systems are always first tuned to benefit our delegates. Decisions made in our behalves are usually far from perfect.Root of democracy is access to right knowledge,and freedom to apply it.Only computer revolution with the Internet global consciousness is giving us hope to sustain our civilisation.
So has anyone seen how the yanks really discovered this in the Persian Gulf years ago with their HAARP! A witness filmed a bit of it... Check out 'HAARP in Iran' I think it's called
ukdutypaid9 1 week ago
Video rất là hay một thí nghiệm thông minh. Tôi ước gì được là một nhà khoa học phát minh ra các rô-bốt giúp đỡ con người vào những công việc nguy hiểm ^^
hoangphuongcasi 11 months ago
Emissions From Steam Engines & Compressed Air.
44AlphaMale44 1 year ago
A grant from the government...phhhffft ya right! I hope he does, but the chances are the government will want to buy it and stick on a shelf, and well never see it or hear about it again.
cndnborn 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free Energy is real and its here but the coverup is strong, if u are interested in a REAL free energy machine then
just go to LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM and download the blueprints ,it is probably the ONLY working magnet
motor out there. Join the free energy revolution!!
buchananfibbing 1 year ago
but the RF generator uses electricity right? how does that work?
bobbysam232 2 years ago
Yeah... but how many of us have access to an RF generator...
RedPhoenix2000 2 years ago 3
And what is the frequency(range) to separate hydrogen and oxygen? With more knowledge we could build those generators and try it out ourselves. Or is is just a hoax?
kakkakakkapylly 2 years ago
So its actually just regular plain ol *saltwater* that is burning, not hydrogen made out of water and electricity?
The energy comes from the *water* not the electricity?
No?
Then shut the hell up about saltwater as fuel.
With this way of reasoning we could also use regular stones as cheap food.
Just put boil regulate stones with meat vegetables and spices, and you get delicious nutritious soup.
Just imagine could feed the whole world for free on stones!
mtssvnsn 2 years ago
@mtssvnsn Please don't fall into a mental trap. Think of it this way - “The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he can’t believe he exists” ~~~ J. Edgar Hoover ~ 33E Scottish Rite, Grand Cross, Director of the FBI and Warren Commission.
CaJeffO 1 year ago
Future plans suggest drivers will be tax on the per mile basis regardless of fuel source via a special GPS system. This is why you are starting to see greater acceptance of alternative technologies begin to rise. The good news is that you won't pollute the environment which may improve health but their is no escaping the power players.
mynycontact 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
invention is nothing but the realisation of an already existing possibility [ in this case in our system/dimension etc ]
nibus9 3 years ago
It sure could impact the entire world...What's the difference between the salt water in that test tube on fire...or the whole ocean? Let's just pray there's no way to do that from space on any of our oceans.
DJReignX 3 years ago
IThere is no need to use salt water when we have wind, solar , magnets and compressed air as alternative energy sources.
mynycontact 2 years ago
so does that mean we will run out off salt water?? lol well the planet is coverd with 2/3 of it
L2thePz 3 years ago
No laws broken in physics here, just an easier more effecient way to access the hydrogen in water, which is great, beacause we are alwasys told it take more energy than what it can produce. Thats bull. Water as fuel is totally viable if cracked effeciently. There are many low powered tricks to break that bond instead of great amounts raw power to crack water. 13.56 mhz 9.26 mhz
energyismass 3 years ago
If your getting out more energy then your putting in how are laws of physics not broken?
Your statements contradict each other.
BugNuggets 3 years ago
hydrogen is the fuel and you can crack water easily with much less energy than your told. No overunity proven, just an effecient way to access hydrogen for fuel.
energyismass 3 years ago
Well I guess there's your chance to become a billionaire! The world uses over 100M lbs of hydrogen a year, most of it coming from hydrocarbon reductions. With your expertise in extracting it cheaply you should be a billionaire many times over in a matter of months.
BugNuggets 3 years ago
Come on over, we'll make a billion together.
energyismass 3 years ago
Please check my other video of collections of other water fuel technology has been developed.
mzhang19 3 years ago
Yes. Laws is written by men, men has limited point of views, therefore the laws can only apply to certain area, not all. REMEMBER! all invention start with breaking some wellknown laws. How many time of human change and update the laws in the past 100 years? there was a lot, and there will not end just now, it will keeps changing, and keep improving.
mzhang19 3 years ago
Can you point out a single accepted law of physics that has been broken in the last 100 years? Just one?
BugNuggets 3 years ago
Please check a news from BBC back to May 2002, title "Laws of physics 'may change'", and please read it you will surprise how little we know the universe. If you think we have already know every laws of physics, think again.
mzhang19 3 years ago
Nothing I wrote implies I think we have found all the laws of physics. I simply stated the "laws" we currently have are based on the most fundamental of observations.
And as these videos are proof of, news broadcasts are hardly the source you want to quote when discussing science.
BugNuggets 3 years ago
Okay, I found the article you mentioned plus others and I noticed two things.
1. Their discussing laws of nature which are typically things like constants (pi, c, etc), not laws of physics are based on more interaction.
2. The method of presentation. These videos show no evidence and basically claim they might have invalidated everything we know of physics. BBC group shows lots of evidence and then explains in detail that it's not proven yet and what more is needed.
See a difference?
BugNuggets 3 years ago
Ever hear of anti gravity? Not possible, broken all time by silent craft floating around. A nuke is an overunity weapon. You know it, I know it. What the fark do we know? WE Don't know shit. You act like the authority on the subject, you don't know shit. You only know what you been told, you ever do anything experimental? or do you just blab your pesimestic pie hole all day long in this forum? Deventurd and Buttnuggets act like farken shills.
energyismass 3 years ago
Actually nukes are horribly inefficient weapons, far from being overunity. That majority of fissible material is unreacted during the process.
You provide a detailed procedure for any over-unity reaction/process and I'll gladly set-up the experiment, setting up laboratory work is what I do for a living, been in the business for almost 20 years.
BugNuggets 3 years ago
Those laws mean nothing because we act as if we know everything, when we clearly only know one billionth one one percent of the mysteries of the Universe!
proverb311031 3 years ago
That pretty much just means theres more laws to write, not that those discovered are invalid. Laws in science are based on the most basic of observations. If you had even a minor understanding of them you'd be more like "Duh, why did they even bother to state that it's so obvious".
BugNuggets 3 years ago
Gov Grant?????This guy needs 24 hour protection from the Gov. You have to have a death wish to invent something thats going to challenge big oil. They (oil) poisoned the poor bastard that invented the water powered engine. This guy is next if he isn't careful.Screw the patents, he needs to go live voyercam worldwide 24/7 so if he does get offed his secrets dont die w/him and big oil doesn't buy the pattents and lose'em.
thezenofsurf 3 years ago
Right on!! Reality is only a concept thought up by humans,, NOT universal nature
ronbros 4 years ago
Lets put a bucket of salt water in there and see if you get plasma with same amount of power used. Hmmmm I can see this as an overunity device. Excited hydrogen, reverses spin of H electron creating the GR vortex with alows magnetism to be converted to plasma. Notice how little water or salt is burned in the process.
energyismass 4 years ago
how come everybody is dumb ,except jonahansen!!!
ronbros 4 years ago
this just maybe a real break thru, a lot of info has never been avilable to the people.
ronbros 4 years ago
Yeah, right. Take a physics class.
jonahansen 4 years ago
It's not water,
its liquid magic!- Stupid people!
Archarger 4 years ago
This has to be bullshit. All the energy is being supplied by the
RF field, and a lot more is being put in than is available
in the "flame" of dissociated hydrogen and oxygen from the water,
if that is what it is (it may just be plasma from RF ionization).
jonahansen 4 years ago
How do you know more energy is required to generate the radio waves than is being released from the 1500c flame ?
CureCorpsAfrica 4 years ago
Conservation of energy (lol). "laws of physics as we know them today" - like this law could be overturned! The universe could not exist if "free" energy could be produced. And temperature is an intensive property - you can raise the temperature of a very small bit of matter very high with very little energy.
jonahansen 4 years ago
The law of the conservation of energy is not in question in this case because mass could be sacrificed in a chemical reaction. A small amount of energy in the form of radio waves would merely provide a means of producing hydrogen witch in turn is burned for more energy than it takes to produce the radio waves. This is not some perpetual motion machine because a complex chemical reaction is present.
dapple33 3 years ago
I don't see enough bubbles in the test tube to support that flame.
Otherwise it would violate the laws of thermodynamics,
which even Einstein said were the most elegant and solid, being
based on minimal assumptions, as well as conservation of energy.
jonahansen 4 years ago
It would violate the laws of physics as we know them today ...
CureCorpsAfrica 4 years ago
It would violate the laws of physics as we know them today ...
CureCorpsAfrica 4 years ago
What it
does demonstrate is the blinding stupidity/ignorance of not only people,
but also the news media. Remember the cold fusion fiasco? Any
scientist or engineer worth their salt, so to speak, would not give
this idea a second's thought, any more than the hoax videos like the one
purporting to show how to make water burn by putting two AA
cells in it for 45 minutes. Woof!
jonahansen 4 years ago
i have always wondered why no one has ever found a way to convert saltwater into fuel; i mean its only covering half the world! so about damn time!!
heravamp 4 years ago
it works because the sodium chloride weakens the bond between the hydrogen and the oxygen, the radio waves break the hydrogen free, and it burns, the hydrogen is burning, not the water, check it out at popsci. the problem is that the radio generator takes up more energy than the fire produces, so it isnt that efficient
pfeifer85 4 years ago
No its not real, thats why at the end of these news stories, salt water fire, water torch, if you notice, say they are working with the Defense Dept. now. hmmmmmm Congradulations boys, your in the club, now keep your mouth shut, errr else, but hey, we give you a job. This is what happens when people have a valid cliam that easily demonstates over unity.
energyismass 4 years ago
the reason water wiull never work is because iut goes agaistn the law of physics...its a modern galilieo..this guy isnt the first to discover this...sadly it doesnt mattter scientists won't accept water fuel casue they believe it takes more energy to burn it then the ammount of energy it produces
bebepepper131 4 years ago
Does the BTU value of the hydrogen generated equal or exceed the energy used by the RF generator?
ignoblius 4 years ago
We better believe it this time! Many discoveries ahead of its times are usually shelved, and we have plenty of those. Why!?..Fundamental flaw of individual central point of view of interest.Political systems are always first tuned to benefit our delegates. Decisions made in our behalves are usually far from perfect.Root of democracy is access to right knowledge,and freedom to apply it.Only computer revolution with the Internet global consciousness is giving us hope to sustain our civilisation.
dasa41 4 years ago