I realy do likke what he said and I think this is right that Hong Kong should have some thing to prove them and Hong kong dont have much space is only because so many people came from china(大陸) look see if all those people are gone only left this real Hong kong people that should be much much more area that we can work on and I m sure and one more thing I m going to say is I m eally Suporting what he is say
to lorgei: I am just say that we don't need this ugly cement pier, not all the heritage or historical building, don't mislead my words. In fact this pier is not a high value historical building. at least I think the old central post office is more value than it, from the design and the historical points, the central post office is directly related to most HK people, Regret that it had been destroyed! why you guys didn't opposed it at that moment?
to Kirkma, HK already has a lots of land marks, don't need this ugly cement pier. it's just a simple desing like the kwun tong or tsuen wan old pier. Have you visited those cities in China, they really the same?
Honestly say, those old train station have been modified, otherwise they can't to serve the public anymore!
the old kowloon railway station, can't be in service for the modern days too!
Are you suggesting that all heritage/historical buildings be demolish in favour of commercial high rises which generate revenue for the goverment? Have you even thought about all the unrenewable resources you'd need to use to demolish and construct as opposed to a 'adaptive reuse' approach?
i think those fool only play anti-govermnent game. it is their final goal. if they are brave enought, just declare they will anti any thing the government propose, and even declare they will against the CCP government, i may have mercy on them and support their fool!
Have you keep your so called Vintage toys? May be your home full of those Vintage stuff? But how many people will keep it? only a samll number of so called BB (ungrow-up) or a fool to pay a high cost for a dream, but in reality the majority can't afford to pay this game!
To starstarca, What is the identity? When you go shopping, you buy what shows your identity. Do you like someone buy for you, and put on you, you would probably say "no." If so, why the city cannot retain its identity. The majority new airports in China, technically, they are the same looking, which becomes bored. This is no character. The train stations in major cities of the US and Euorpe, are unite and different, and everyone retains its own stories that people participated.
when you grow up, you have a lots child hood toys, but your home is not big enough, do you throw away your toys to refurnish your home? or just keep those rubbish let it stuck your space, and blame on your parents?
You're absolutely wrong. You want to create a logic? Okay, Do you know that? Many people blame themselves that they've thrown away their old vintage toys of thier childhood. Because they've found those toys with unbelievable high bidding price on eBay now. Do you know that? Raze Queen's Pier is just the beginning of the plan. Tool!
唉..................
jackytkh 1 year ago
HK!!!
tltl0000 3 years ago
totally agree
support
StationSergeantAngel 3 years ago
講得好，可惜皇后碼頭終於難逃被拆命運，Hong Kong goverment & Donald Tsang，shame on you~
hksupermen 4 years ago 4
I realy do likke what he said and I think this is right that Hong Kong should have some thing to prove them and Hong kong dont have much space is only because so many people came from china(大陸) look see if all those people are gone only left this real Hong kong people that should be much much more area that we can work on and I m sure and one more thing I m going to say is I m eally Suporting what he is say
wongP90 4 years ago
to lorgei: I am just say that we don't need this ugly cement pier, not all the heritage or historical building, don't mislead my words. In fact this pier is not a high value historical building. at least I think the old central post office is more value than it, from the design and the historical points, the central post office is directly related to most HK people, Regret that it had been destroyed! why you guys didn't opposed it at that moment?
starstarca 4 years ago
to Kirkma, HK already has a lots of land marks, don't need this ugly cement pier. it's just a simple desing like the kwun tong or tsuen wan old pier. Have you visited those cities in China, they really the same?
Honestly say, those old train station have been modified, otherwise they can't to serve the public anymore!
the old kowloon railway station, can't be in service for the modern days too!
starstarca 4 years ago
Are you suggesting that all heritage/historical buildings be demolish in favour of commercial high rises which generate revenue for the goverment? Have you even thought about all the unrenewable resources you'd need to use to demolish and construct as opposed to a 'adaptive reuse' approach?
lorgei 4 years ago
i think those fool only play anti-govermnent game. it is their final goal. if they are brave enought, just declare they will anti any thing the government propose, and even declare they will against the CCP government, i may have mercy on them and support their fool!
starstarca 4 years ago
to BBnose:
Have you keep your so called Vintage toys? May be your home full of those Vintage stuff? But how many people will keep it? only a samll number of so called BB (ungrow-up) or a fool to pay a high cost for a dream, but in reality the majority can't afford to pay this game!
starstarca 4 years ago
To starstarca, What is the identity? When you go shopping, you buy what shows your identity. Do you like someone buy for you, and put on you, you would probably say "no." If so, why the city cannot retain its identity. The majority new airports in China, technically, they are the same looking, which becomes bored. This is no character. The train stations in major cities of the US and Euorpe, are unite and different, and everyone retains its own stories that people participated.
kirkma 4 years ago
詹瑞文
when you grow up, you have a lots child hood toys, but your home is not big enough, do you throw away your toys to refurnish your home? or just keep those rubbish let it stuck your space, and blame on your parents?
starstarca 4 years ago
You're absolutely wrong. You want to create a logic? Okay, Do you know that? Many people blame themselves that they've thrown away their old vintage toys of thier childhood. Because they've found those toys with unbelievable high bidding price on eBay now. Do you know that? Raze Queen's Pier is just the beginning of the plan. Tool!
BBnose 4 years ago
有些言論很荒謬,說:"皇后碼頭只係代表英國植民地",如果你的觀點成立,那租界時期上海外灘的西式建築物全部要拆嗎?然後建三十層高的玻璃外牆商業中心加商場好不好?這是不是你想見到的?真想同你說"too simple, sometimes naive!"
BBnose 4 years ago
每個人都有唔同的價值觀，香港過去的確是殖民地，摧毀皇后碼頭就能否認這個鐵一般的過去？點解唔學德國人留下侵略別人的證據,令自己反省過去？
拆天星，皇后的背後原因你是否清楚明白？未明白之前為何話人教壞細路，就批評這一群有社會意識的大學生？ Sor 有d 睇唔過眼先講幾句心底話，唔岩聽道歉先！
YanYanloveYou2000 4 years ago
His speech really disapointed me.....:(
kokio 4 years ago
In what way? By telling what he thinks? By not supporting everything the government says? Critical thinking is what you need to learn kid...
jhftang 4 years ago
皇后碼頭只係代表英國植民地?
How are you that sure?
Do you know that tons of REBELLION movement against the Colonial government started in 皇后碼頭 as well?
This is OUR piece of history.
Btw, he got scholarship to study in body arts, and he IS a 文化人.
If you want to make a point and make people listen to you, its better to be less emotional and state your point logically.
Nice guitar playing...you may one day be a guitarist...oh but wait..that will be No 文化?
haha
jhftang 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
呢條詹瑞文, 收皮啦!教壞晒d年青人, 以為自己咩文化, 文藝....!
扮晒文化人...睇見你都想嘔啦..!滿腦子都係低等無文化...咩叫中西文化呀..皇后碼頭只係代表英國植民地, 我唔想有呢d回憶呀!仆街! 自己知道自己喺呢個社會有影響力, 就請你自己自重下, 唔好成日掛住成名, 就亂嗡一通, 好多人會比你咁樣教壞架! 仆街!我忽你!! I 拂 YOU !!!!!
horsebaby 4 years ago
Happy to see so many students who are able to be critical of the government's deeds and be passionate about this Land.
Thinknomore710 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
香港每年比咁多錢, 點知教左班反政府的大學生出黎, 佢地仲以為好有文化有勇敢, 多麼諷刺
ccckkk56 4 years ago
Bravo, Bravo. Don't like this guy, but he certainly is right
ACYFU 4 years ago
Very well said.
TSalon 4 years ago