Added: 1 year ago
From: theatertalk
Views: 5,971
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (20)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The fashion industry is so good at what they do, that they got teenage boys to walk around with there pants half down. What next? Diapers on their heads? A beer bottle in their ass? Or how about cement shoes?

  • @tweekyseagull You're a moron it wasn't the fashion industry who influenced that, its something of completely separate thing. 

  • @tweekyseagull You're a moron it wasn't the fashion industry who influenced that, its something of completely separate thing. 

  • So...that $3000 that people spend...does that not help keep people employed? I'm assuming that Garafalo doesn't live like a pauper any more than Michael Moore does.

  • @SCE2AUX

    No, it doesn't keep people employed.

  • @dpshaffer07 Actually it does, the money spent is what keeps businesses solvent and allows them to keep employees, pretty basic economics there.

  • @SCE2AUX

    So you think that $3,000 spent on one bag is going to keep anybody employed? If money is spent on building, or reasonably priced products like food, or its spent on services, yes, it will keep people employed. NOT a $3,000 bag.

    Rich people spending their money on rich people things, like $3,000 bags, does not "trickle down" to not-rich people. The only thing rich spending does is keep other rich people rich.

  • @dpshaffer07 You're still wrong that money doesn't remain static, it is passed through other hands many times and ir does keep people emplyoyed.

  • @SCE2AUX

    Please explain how rich people giving other rich people money for rich people things benefits ANYONE besides rich people?? And besides, she is COMPLETELY right in saying that money would be much better spent on hungry people, rather than purses.

  • Who gives a good damn what Janeane Garofalo thinks about anything? She always squats a big turd into every topic. Negative self-hating bitch.

  • @MrDavearama Years of feminism still keeping her sexy....

  • @MrDavearama She´s right. I hate Sex and the city due to its stupid lead character and her spending money on pointless things - no wonder people think SJP is ugly - its not just her appearance but the fact that she portrays a character so shallow and unlikable.

  • Just saw Carol Kane in "The Bodyguard". She should do a lot more movies. She is still adorable.

  • THANK YOU...I thought I was the only one who felt this way...I've always liked Janeane & Carol,now I have another reason to like and respect them.

    Can we have some more anti-fashionistas in this country,please?

    Where are the other actresses,singers,etc.-who will get on tv and say these things?

  • @doodoochaser well put feel that way as well my friend.

  • wise comments from Carol

  • Carol Kane is so...shining :)

  • I like when she mentions Sex and the city ladies and it cuts to Susan who says one word, "Horrifying" that's hilarious Susan.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more