The whole prelude interestingly appears in the Sims 3 Late Night Expansion under the name of 'Wilkinson's Bay Sonata' (they FINALLY put the piano back into the game...). I was pleasantly surprised when I heard it.
Also, thanks for putting the sheet music with it. It's wonderful for seeing all the counterpoint, and shows the second part in all its fugal beauty and perfection.
This is one of the few Fugues that sticks in my mind, probably due to the recurrence of the rather unique opening motif (bars 1-2). BWV 848 is the only set where I like both the Prelude and Fugue together.
Incidentally, the Prelude sounds really good with sustain as well (though strictly speaking you're not supposed to use sustain seeing as how it's a Baroque piece and meant to be played detached). When you play it with sustain you can add a lot more emotion and voila - it turns into a Romantic piece!!!
It's Bach's notes that matter. They will work on virtually any Western instrument. They sound good on the authentic Baroque instruments and they also sound good on synthesiser. This is a wonderful performance.
I find that Bachs music always sounds better played on the harpsichord. If you really enjoy the piano and early music practice is not your thing, then this performance is wonderful. But though it is playable on the piano, it does not sound right to me.
@insaneguitarfreak i always found the tetris connection interesting, because the way that all the different parts in a bach piece fit together is incredibly reminiscent in my mind of a well-played game of tetris
In measure 30 on the fugue and exactly at 2.17, richter oddly plays E-natural instead of E-sharp on the left hand downward scale, i've checked it with several editions and still haven't found out why so.
Theory question. At 2:00 if you pause and look at the second measure there is a cancellation of a double sharp... but not on the same octave.. is that a misprint?
THat, or they take into consideration that there actually may be performers stupid enough to think that they have to play a double sharp up there as well... I dunno, it doesn't make sense to me either. I guess it's just a precaution to prevent misreadings of that note
How does that make them stupid? And now I have a question... If there is an accidental on one note, is that accidental automatically made natural for the same note that is an octave higher in the same measure?
@UserID20 there is few notation system, in european one any chromatic sign concerns a note in every octaves, but still it is useless to write cancellation and then sharp. It has to be older notation system in my opinion.
Where do u get the sheet music for this? I know where to get the sheet music, but where did u get THIS SPECIFIC sheet music? (sorry for the caps, i didnt mean it as yelling, its just that u cant use italics when making a comment)
The leading tone (the dotted 1/8th D##) of the cadence to E# minor is trilled.
Although no ornament appears over the D## in the Bach-Gesellschaft edition, it would be standard Baroque practice to ornament it because it's the leading tone of a cadence on an accented note.
In other words, the D## here should be trilled (from above, not below), whether or not any ornament is written in the score.
I just love ALL of these - Please try and complete the whole set VERY SOON - And thanks for all the very hard work you have put in to make these truly magical pieces become even more entertaining.
If without any understanding of history and only the present with which to theorize on why Bach compiled works in different keys then I would have to say it is for the same reason that someone might order three different flavors of ice cream on three different occasions. And besides, he was a logical and organized man in his music anyway, why _wouldn't_ he have quite neatly compiled his works so without need of any motive at all?
It appears that he accumulated various preludes and fugues that he had composed over a period of years before he eventually got the idea to compile them into the collection known as "WTC", tranposing them as needed to provide the required key signatures (and otherwise editing and expanding the originals).
Bach's purpose was in writing WTC was, among other things, to show that all 24 keys "work" on a keyboard with "well-tempered" tuning (not quite the same as modern equal temperament). This was a hot topic at the time.
He was not trying to show that each key has a different character. The notion each key has a different character is a romantic notion of the 19th century.
I dunno. Generally authorized I suppose. What I mean is that it follows Bachs final revision of the score to the letter and the only changes (like small ornaments) that are present are always mentioned and motivated.
Authorized by the Bachian high priests, no doubt. LOL
Like most of his music, Bach never published this work. But he did allow it to be circluated in manuscript. The result is that this work was widely distributed, both before and after his death, with variant readings, some of which are obviously in error. The 1st printed edition did not appear until 1801.
Bach's son-in-law, Johann Altnickol, who copied many of Bach's works, may be the best source (?) of WTC.
Bach's sons inherited major parts of his music library. C.P.E bach tried to purchase the music his siblings inherited in order to preserve it. Forkel edited the 1st printed edition (1801) of WTC I from a copy he obtained from W.F. or C.P.E Bach, both of whom he knew personally. When C.P.E died, his daughter sold his estate to Felix Mendelssohn's father, who then donated it the Berlin Sing-Akademie.
I think WTC II came from copies Altnickol made from 2 sources Bach provided.
Omg I love this version I'm taking piano now and man I can't wait to play this I'm sooo excited; love this piece to death I acutally love it in this key. :)
Oye, I'm just starting the prelude for this piece and, Lo!, all five pages take a minute-and-a-half to play. What?!? OMG. Ya know, most of us don't even *aspire* to be pros. We just love the sounds that pianos make. I'll be happy if I can play through it without stopping!!
by a lack of variance in phrasing concept as outlined by the lack of variety in hand contrast,beat placement,sequential heirarchical variance,and most importantly tempo manipulation....."
Rosalyn Turek is also great. She's so dynamic and powerful. I love her take on well tempered clavier in BBC legends CD. But I enjoy Richter too. Romantic and beautiful =) Thank you for posting!
If you think your favourite is another player, then look how Richter plays all the other composers, than compare again. I never heard such an artist who can interpret so many composers in such a high quality and level. Horrowitz, Rubinstein, Gould etc.., they all were so genius of their kind, but in my opinion Richter is the most versatile pianointerpreter of all.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The prelude is pleasant but bordering on vapid as the articulation is the only thing that gets interesting treatment.
As to the fugue,I like his general tempo but find that the playfulness is undermined
by a lack of variance in phrasing concept as outlined by the lack of variety in hand contrast,beat placement,sequential heirarchical variance,and most importantly tempo manipulation.
Very effective, perfect bach's sound. Even though, to my taste, i would slacken the tempo a tiny bit at the end of whole phrases so to avoid the feeling that they are breathless chasing after one another. Anyway, great interpretation and still a modell for all those who want to study this piece.
Lame? Oh not at all! It's precisely as the notes show. I also like the "Rit" at the end of the fugue as well. Something that Gould does not always do. A bit romantic perhaps, but very defensible interpretation by the greatest pianist of the 20th century!
Chopin op. 10 no. 4?
JohnEBPiano 7 months ago
Just as a side note:
The whole prelude interestingly appears in the Sims 3 Late Night Expansion under the name of 'Wilkinson's Bay Sonata' (they FINALLY put the piano back into the game...). I was pleasantly surprised when I heard it.
JustLooking876 1 year ago
This whole piece is incredible
tarquin161234 1 year ago
@PetetheJazzMan yup, i´m well aware of that, I think any of his fugues would sound fascinating even if they are recorded with the sounds of farts lol
insaneguitarfreak 1 year ago
@insaneguitarfreak sounds of farts haha
thefloyd10 1 year ago
Also, thanks for putting the sheet music with it. It's wonderful for seeing all the counterpoint, and shows the second part in all its fugal beauty and perfection.
rumpranger65 1 year ago
How do you guys keep the left hand so steady and perfect? Right hand, no problem. Left hand, I can't keep it steady and I get "wobbly".
rumpranger65 1 year ago
just tooo fast. He totally misses the point, really ruins the whole prelude... it needs to be said, Gould hither and thither
Keytaster 1 year ago
This piece is so good!! Check out my recording and see what you think! :D
TheClassicalTriad 1 year ago
Nobody does it like Bach!
Daftpunkfan123 1 year ago
Just amazing!
Ant2101 1 year ago
Amen to anyways589!!!
vikagusenkov 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
dayum niggas dis is some hype ass shit.
lilnigga864 2 years ago
Typical C# major piece *smirks*
werq34ac 2 years ago 4
This is one of the few Fugues that sticks in my mind, probably due to the recurrence of the rather unique opening motif (bars 1-2). BWV 848 is the only set where I like both the Prelude and Fugue together.
pianololita 2 years ago 2
Is it just the recording, or is there sustain?
Incidentally, the Prelude sounds really good with sustain as well (though strictly speaking you're not supposed to use sustain seeing as how it's a Baroque piece and meant to be played detached). When you play it with sustain you can add a lot more emotion and voila - it turns into a Romantic piece!!!
pianololita 2 years ago
do you think this a easier prelude and fugue than the G sharp major
judily678 2 years ago
It's Bach's notes that matter. They will work on virtually any Western instrument. They sound good on the authentic Baroque instruments and they also sound good on synthesiser. This is a wonderful performance.
yourforte 2 years ago 5
Exactly, it is a matter of taste. What I wrote earlier is my opinion. Play it how ever you damn please!
anyways589 2 years ago 9
@anyways589 But there will be no pianos in damnation!
3NUNS 2 years ago
It is actually just a matter of taste.
Rasmoujinaltann 2 years ago
I find that Bachs music always sounds better played on the harpsichord. If you really enjoy the piano and early music practice is not your thing, then this performance is wonderful. But though it is playable on the piano, it does not sound right to me.
anyways589 2 years ago
Bach sounds ALWAYS great, even in midi format in a Tetris game. Just because. Or just because it´s Bach.
insaneguitarfreak 2 years ago 18
@insaneguitarfreak i always found the tetris connection interesting, because the way that all the different parts in a bach piece fit together is incredibly reminiscent in my mind of a well-played game of tetris
fledgehog 2 months ago
I was under the impression that the WTC Book 1 was written with the clavichord in mind. Forgive me if I'm wrong because I'm not a pianist.
dogtransport 2 years ago
@dogtransport : That is what tom-fool opponents of the harpsichord would allege.
3NUNS 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@dogtransport That´s what opponents of the harpsichord would allege.
3NUNS 2 years ago
I ment in the fugue.
Rasmoujinaltann 2 years ago
Excellent theme!
Rasmoujinaltann 2 years ago
In measure 30 on the fugue and exactly at 2.17, richter oddly plays E-natural instead of E-sharp on the left hand downward scale, i've checked it with several editions and still haven't found out why so.
crazyunicorn20 2 years ago 5
@crazyunicorn20 : Good observation !
3NUNS 2 years ago
like the fugue ;-P
Franci110 2 years ago
I think I like this version more than gould's. In this version I can hear the notes, it's lighter! But both of them are excellent!
tyr12345yurty 2 years ago 2
Ah the master composer played by the master performer... what more could one wish for?
DavidMTRutten 2 years ago 2
I wish I had more regularity in bowel movements, personally.
tasha122277 2 years ago
...how about a well-tempered harpsichord, say Werkmeister temperament, instead of an equal tempered piano, and master harpsichordist, like Koopman.
wcbroccoli 2 years ago
Theory question. At 2:00 if you pause and look at the second measure there is a cancellation of a double sharp... but not on the same octave.. is that a misprint?
UserID20 2 years ago
THat, or they take into consideration that there actually may be performers stupid enough to think that they have to play a double sharp up there as well... I dunno, it doesn't make sense to me either. I guess it's just a precaution to prevent misreadings of that note
Pianoplayer002 2 years ago
How does that make them stupid? And now I have a question... If there is an accidental on one note, is that accidental automatically made natural for the same note that is an octave higher in the same measure?
theofferingx 2 years ago
@UserID20 there is few notation system, in european one any chromatic sign concerns a note in every octaves, but still it is useless to write cancellation and then sharp. It has to be older notation system in my opinion.
wilkw3 1 year ago
C-sharp major? That scale seems mighty uncomfortable.
roflcoptersoysoy 2 years ago
Where do u get the sheet music for this? I know where to get the sheet music, but where did u get THIS SPECIFIC sheet music? (sorry for the caps, i didnt mean it as yelling, its just that u cant use italics when making a comment)
pizzaboy456783 2 years ago
Cool!!!!1
alon98il 2 years ago
Che musica stupenda
Gabry950 2 years ago
i`m like richter, but i`m love gould ..
br0z31x 2 years ago
i know how glenn gould is amazing and all that but i still like richters when in comes to bach
sauternety36 2 years ago
Thank you!
Richter is my reference - at least for the WTC!
Krouchinski 2 years ago
This songbook makes my cock throb uncontrollably.
AnonymousWhitePerson 3 years ago 6
Spoken like a true Miley Cyrus fan...
cbdesade 2 years ago 2
haha
judily678 2 years ago
(Das Wohltemperirte Clavier)
AnonymousWhitePerson 3 years ago
Does anybody know what happened at 2:00?
a5urbanipa1 3 years ago
huh?
Pianoplayer002 3 years ago
Yes we know what happened, he played the Pralltriller, as indicated.
RDSerebrianny 2 years ago
Didn't it sound weird and completely out of context?
a5urbanipa1 2 years ago
Nopeeeeeee
itsanthonyhere 2 years ago
The leading tone (the dotted 1/8th D##) of the cadence to E# minor is trilled.
Although no ornament appears over the D## in the Bach-Gesellschaft edition, it would be standard Baroque practice to ornament it because it's the leading tone of a cadence on an accented note.
In other words, the D## here should be trilled (from above, not below), whether or not any ornament is written in the score.
wcbroccoli 2 years ago
when are you going to upload more bach?
ryab55 3 years ago
Adding score is a great idea - must be time consuming but much appreciated - I love ths playing!!!
florhand 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I just love ALL of these - Please try and complete the whole set VERY SOON - And thanks for all the very hard work you have put in to make these truly magical pieces become even more entertaining.
pianojeans 3 years ago
Grandioso Richter , questa è una delle più belle interpretazioni del WTC a mio parere :9
simipiano 3 years ago
Wonderful interpretation. Gould...Richter...who's the best Bach's interpret?
didirama28 3 years ago
Gould
Coixxman 3 years ago
Gould for Bach, Richter for Bach and for all the rest :)
framaulo 3 years ago 2
I agree...
NovaTheli 3 years ago
Do you have a link to the sheet music or can you send it to me through email?
culgurl95 3 years ago
MY FAVOURITE!!!!!!!!!!!
alexanderlo968 3 years ago
i love this prelude/fugue, but would you happen to have bwv 847?
NewDawnFades608 3 years ago 2
You never know what might come in a not-too-distant future ;) *smiles secretly*
Pianoplayer002 3 years ago
can i take that as a yes? *grins like an eager child*
NewDawnFades608 3 years ago
BWV 847 has Now Been Uploaded =) Along with BWV 846 and BWV 864!
Pianoplayer002 3 years ago
If without any understanding of history and only the present with which to theorize on why Bach compiled works in different keys then I would have to say it is for the same reason that someone might order three different flavors of ice cream on three different occasions. And besides, he was a logical and organized man in his music anyway, why _wouldn't_ he have quite neatly compiled his works so without need of any motive at all?
dolofonos 3 years ago
this is an insane fugue
saintdracula 3 years ago 3
how do you mean? in a good way, no?
blogger314 3 years ago
Of course in a good way
saintdracula 3 years ago
lively and animated. It perfectly matches the key of C sharp major! Nothing could be more joyful than this key itself. Thanks for uploading this!
sherilyn29 3 years ago
funny you say that. It was original in c major but Bach then added the seven sharps to keep it in keeping with the "24 prelude's and fugue's".
tothemax91 3 years ago 2
Amusing and true.
It appears that he accumulated various preludes and fugues that he had composed over a period of years before he eventually got the idea to compile them into the collection known as "WTC", tranposing them as needed to provide the required key signatures (and otherwise editing and expanding the originals).
wcbroccoli 3 years ago
Bach's purpose was in writing WTC was, among other things, to show that all 24 keys "work" on a keyboard with "well-tempered" tuning (not quite the same as modern equal temperament). This was a hot topic at the time.
He was not trying to show that each key has a different character. The notion each key has a different character is a romantic notion of the 19th century.
wcbroccoli 3 years ago
Except that this is the URTEXT version. That feels pretty authorized to me =)
Pianoplayer002 3 years ago
Authorized by whom?
3NUNS 3 years ago
I dunno. Generally authorized I suppose. What I mean is that it follows Bachs final revision of the score to the letter and the only changes (like small ornaments) that are present are always mentioned and motivated.
Pianoplayer002 3 years ago
Yeah dude, URTEXT is key
LeonidasBasileus 3 years ago
Authorized by the Bachian high priests, no doubt. LOL
Like most of his music, Bach never published this work. But he did allow it to be circluated in manuscript. The result is that this work was widely distributed, both before and after his death, with variant readings, some of which are obviously in error. The 1st printed edition did not appear until 1801.
Bach's son-in-law, Johann Altnickol, who copied many of Bach's works, may be the best source (?) of WTC.
wcbroccoli 3 years ago
Bach's sons inherited major parts of his music library. C.P.E bach tried to purchase the music his siblings inherited in order to preserve it. Forkel edited the 1st printed edition (1801) of WTC I from a copy he obtained from W.F. or C.P.E Bach, both of whom he knew personally. When C.P.E died, his daughter sold his estate to Felix Mendelssohn's father, who then donated it the Berlin Sing-Akademie.
I think WTC II came from copies Altnickol made from 2 sources Bach provided.
wcbroccoli 3 years ago
with the odd unauthorised note ... .
3NUNS 3 years ago
looks like the Czerny et al Peter's edition to me ...
3NUNS 3 years ago
as was Gould!.....And I like your name!:P
HelveteKeiser 3 years ago
Subscribed!
RabidCh 3 years ago
thank you very much for uploading this, even with the score
seahyimin 3 years ago
There is a 2 MASTER-Inerpreters of GENIUS-BACH in westGLOBE Glen Gould, in eastGLOBE Sviatoslav Richter. Their still THE BEST !
sam0xin 3 years ago
Omg I love this version I'm taking piano now and man I can't wait to play this I'm sooo excited; love this piece to death I acutally love it in this key. :)
FREEASTHESTARS 3 years ago
Kindly don't use that most pathetic of pathetic syllogisms Omg. Blasphemer thou shall be a fireman in Hell for evermore.
3NUNS 3 years ago
Oye, I'm just starting the prelude for this piece and, Lo!, all five pages take a minute-and-a-half to play. What?!? OMG. Ya know, most of us don't even *aspire* to be pros. We just love the sounds that pianos make. I'll be happy if I can play through it without stopping!!
mazzoneclementi 3 years ago
Infact Richter is one of the best performers of Bach too !!!!!!!
Timmytimtimtm 3 years ago
The fugue is awesome!
felixhungtingngai 3 years ago 3
Yes, but months of intensive practice...
I know what I'm talking about O.o
Rakazan 3 years ago
"......the playfulness is undermined
by a lack of variance in phrasing concept as outlined by the lack of variety in hand contrast,beat placement,sequential heirarchical variance,and most importantly tempo manipulation....."
Imagine this spoken in the voice of Bette Davis.
Geddit ?
Suddenly it all makes sense.
JohnnyKapsberger 3 years ago
what the hell are you talking about? It's an awesome performance!
cbfoto 3 years ago
Very nice!
My favorite interpretation is Glenn Gould.
wetlltempredclavier 3 years ago
It's great how you put up the music as it is being played! Better than holding up my book here... Thanks!
hainanrose 3 years ago
Absolutely flawless! Another great interpreter of WTC is Jeno Jando!
jannokas85 3 years ago
yo is this lmusa?
fizzymacgummy 3 years ago
im playing the frist song it sounds great but it kinda hard :)
chineseguardianangel 3 years ago
its not a song...
Fryderyk104 3 years ago
Rosalyn Turek is also great. She's so dynamic and powerful. I love her take on well tempered clavier in BBC legends CD. But I enjoy Richter too. Romantic and beautiful =) Thank you for posting!
dubaiforty 3 years ago
If you think your favourite is another player, then look how Richter plays all the other composers, than compare again. I never heard such an artist who can interpret so many composers in such a high quality and level. Horrowitz, Rubinstein, Gould etc.., they all were so genius of their kind, but in my opinion Richter is the most versatile pianointerpreter of all.
tomaxi007 4 years ago 3
true that.
123freejose 4 years ago
very well played. Another really good pianist is zhang hao chen
pianistyin 4 years ago
I prefer Jared Jano's interpretation, but this is still a pretty good take on Bach's WTC.
Viahandel06 4 years ago
- Garcon! Another napkin, please!
- You've had enough for today, Mr. Smithsherman. Are you all right? You have been writing and writing, like possessed. What is it about?
- Someone has put a bunch of Richter performances on YT. I must write to open people's eyes. They should know the truth!
- The bar is closing. Do you need any help getting home?
- No, thanks. I think I can cross the street on my own.
:-)
mltube 4 years ago 8
LOL. Why does this fellow always write in such over-complicated terms and...hardly ever says anything nice about any great pianist...
jannokas85 3 years ago
Go listen to Samuel Feinburg play Bach on the piano at Youtube...then you'll know.
smithsherman 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The prelude is pleasant but bordering on vapid as the articulation is the only thing that gets interesting treatment.
As to the fugue,I like his general tempo but find that the playfulness is undermined
by a lack of variance in phrasing concept as outlined by the lack of variety in hand contrast,beat placement,sequential heirarchical variance,and most importantly tempo manipulation.
smithsherman 4 years ago
Think positive!!!
jannokas85 3 years ago
That was well. It's difficult to make Bach sound good on a piano.
dolofonos 4 years ago
Very effective, perfect bach's sound. Even though, to my taste, i would slacken the tempo a tiny bit at the end of whole phrases so to avoid the feeling that they are breathless chasing after one another. Anyway, great interpretation and still a modell for all those who want to study this piece.
pianofolle 4 years ago
Can't find your version on YT - or anyting else come to think of it, can you post something?
sebmoocj 3 years ago
Lame? Oh not at all! It's precisely as the notes show. I also like the "Rit" at the end of the fugue as well. Something that Gould does not always do. A bit romantic perhaps, but very defensible interpretation by the greatest pianist of the 20th century!
mal8739 4 years ago