@MultiYman It will probably be close to or after 500 years since predictions are often early and rosy. Look at the predictions for the 1962 Seattle Century 21 Worlds Fair. how do you like your flying cars?
Ever see the cartoon of an island slowly sinking? Someone sees it and builds a boat while others ignore untill they build rafts, floating things, or have to tread water. We probably don't have to worry about needing such a spaceship as in the video right now. Probably.
Would someone on another planet see the light show as this ship passed by? How about if they were on another ship going the same direction, at a right angle, or in the opposite direction. I googled "What would you see if travelling near speed of light?" and got many videos. Most were at or beyond light speed.
A lot of videos on YouTube are interesting and they generate a lot of heated discussion, but most times you need more than the 500 characters provided by YouTube to write your comment. Pressed by the limit of characters that can be written in one comment, you could write something useless or unfinished.
Because of this I created a new forum to provide a home for discussion of YouTube videos.
The Lorentz effect would compress time onboard the ship as well. The estimated 5 year onboard duration to Alpha Centauri would be shortened to 3.4 or therabouts. So cold sleep may not be needed, esp if ways are found to generate food and recycle water. The main thing is keeping the delta V within reason for the mass of fuel needed.
At 1:58 I notice that the arms move away in different directions to neutralize torque but don't see anything that would prevent the longitudinal arms coming in due to the change in center of mass caused by the amrs motion.
Although Wikipedia says that Hyrum Graff of "Ender's Game" stayed in stasis for 10 months out of a year in order to live longer, I remember something about him being on a spaceship going in a loop while at near light speed and using an Answerable for communications to Earth.
Ironically this isn't really 'good' enough though is it. I mean someone who IS smarter than Stephen Hawkings will come along, teams of people will better this by far, I think unless you can achive something like start trek or starwars that its never going to quite be GOOD enough, though it would be a pretty good fucking start on anything we already have.. though at that speed, I would be a little worried about hitting... I don't know... something tiny?
@EpikCyAnid Haven't even gotten into life support needs. The alternative to speed is a generation ship where you are trading speed for time in transit, and maybe little or no gravity. More time to hit something that could puncher & from different directions than just forward. Like tank armor, protection would not be the same in every direction.
that's bullshit. 1. nothing can travel that fast.. why? logically speaking, every part of spaceship would evaporate, because protons and neutron that build atoms wouldn't have enough energy to keep its electrons on their orbits.. the speed of electrons that spin around itsnucleus is 3 times slower than speed of light.. that is logical.
@BrandonAnderson8002 I'm not selling it. I'm only saying what is real, I just would be surprised if atoms would survive untouched in a space vacuum traveling with a speed of light.. why? because out there is nothing traveling faster than light.. logical.
mind you, the whole staff along with electromagnetic waves that is thrown out of the Sun never exceed the speed of light..
@Lordshire1 Space isn't a vacuum. There are atoms out there. That is why there are shock waves when a star goes nova or supernova. I remember but am not sure if true that real space has about one atom in every square yard. Whatever it is, if you're going fast enough there will be drag and each particle hitting will have a lot of energy to disapate. More like fewer stinging hail hitting then a gentle breaze on your arm and airfoiled hand outside the car window at 30MPH.
@Lordshire1 As I remember, someone was saying that the vacuum of space is empty. Either that or I just pointed out that there are things out there. Atoms was sufficient for my point & I didn't include other things since I had made my point. You're right in that there are many things out there. More than just an atoms in some volumn of space.
@Lordshire1 They have gotten protrons, electrons & neutrons going real fast in colliders, CERN for one, but I don't know of any atom, meaning hydrogen or deuterium going that fast. I have heard it since childhood that electrons were in orbit but I understand it that they just pop up here and there at different spots in a "shell" or move to different "shells". No orbital velosity involved. Please correct me if I'm wrong. I heard of an experiment with FasterThen Light particle travel.
@ProperLogicalDebate CERN recently confirmed some particles did "seem" to go FTL. They aren't sure if it is really the case or just miscalculation but if it's true then a 4th dimension may be involved so as to not defy the laws of nature.
@cr4yv3n Laws of nature as we know them. What would a roman general think of a pair of childrens two way radio? We don't know everything. We can't assume that we will be abot to solve every problem, or that we can't solve a problem.
For a moment assume that aliens are visiting Earth. The Centari might give us this, Valcans that, but watch out for the Klingons or whoever might want the resources including slaves.
@cr4yv3n The subject was aliens visiting earth. Rather than explaining each possibility I took an example from science fiction of each. I couldn't think of the name of the aliens in the movie "Independance Day" to describe those that would come, take, destroy, leave nothing, so I used Klingon. Sorry if that offends anyone. Other examples are "The day the Earth stood still" which was self protection from Earth wars spreading to them. All fiction (for the moment) & probably won't happen.
@ProperLogicalDebate It was easier to understand if you had said without Sci-fi elements, as i have seen the segment in which he comments about the outcome of an alien encounter would end up "just like the american indians meeting the conquistadores".
@cr4yv3n I am reading "1491" about the american indians before Columbus but that's another subject. Eventually I hope to get to "1492" about after Columbus. All this is another subject.
@ProperLogicalDebate Yes, CERN does it, but single electrons.. not atoms, never heard about it nevertheless. And yes, electrons jump from one orbit to another within the same atom or within different atoms, depending on the attraction of one atom to another. You can clearly notice that some atoms doesn't react with each other, and some react very rapidly.. and this only depends on the mass of the nucleus(protons:neutrons) and the number of electrons and orbits (or shells)
@ProperLogicalDebate moreover, the speed of electrons spinning around the nucleus of any atom or jumping from one orbit to another is about 1/3 of the speed of light.. and that is everything I remember from my primary school..;) I had some chemistry in secondary and university but it's mainly consisted of spectrophotometry and the applications of it within different areas of science..
@ProperLogicalDebate and Yes, they thought they found something that goes faster that light, but just recently I've heard that they made a mistake.. ;) BUT I am pretty sure that there is something faster than the light, and there are so many things going on in the space that we don't know about.
I've read somewhere about Japanese scientists' experiment deep underground that indicated that there is something that going through the everything without damaging it.
@Lordshire1 Neutrinos don't react with other things, particles & atoms, much so that they can go through the earth quite easily and be detected while coming up from below. That is my understanding..
Just as sail, find something already there that you don't have to carry. Not solar sails for 2 reasons. Interstellar space has no bright stars near by. Sails can be damaged by cannonballs and really fast small things.
What is dark energy? Is there really no aether? Other things?
Then there is navigation, distortion due to speed, and because you are so fast with sensor range and thinking time, there might not be time to avoid something really bad. Sensor range might be helped with probes being sent off ahead.
Repeaters dropped off every so often might help keep communications if an Answerable Instantanious Communications System isn't developed. (Some variation of what was used in the Orson Scott Card Ender series)
Just as sail preceded steam to power ships, so finding...
As it moves through space, it hits things very fast which causes drag. Not like holding your arm out the window of a moving car. More like sand from a sanding truck banging really fast. Instead of shielding and bouncing atoms away, how about capturing that energy and recycle part of it's heat?
Another problem is turning it around to put the engines forward and risking all that damage there. Probably best to stop engines and coast to a safe speed, if there is one, before turning around.
you better put first song called power or i will fuck you within an hour
fuck you you fuckin cunt
eat a nigger dick you olden dazer and fuck you and eat your ass.piss,love and happy ass
you fucking fishdick chimp porchmonkey cotton picking jew dyke jackson (coz you fuck children in their anus)
rocket to the dick that helps you talk in your mouth with aids semen you fucking midget faggot asian nigger with aids already from before. in your ear enourmous emission from my mother love
This isn't only directed at you but to everyone else involved in your flame war. I don't care who started it. I calls em as I see em, so no hard feelings. Guess I'm the troll now arent I? X)
Although that slows down the relative time, wouldn't humans still decompose at the same rate as on earth? What I'm getting at is that yes the clock slows down, but everything else goes at the same speed. Or am I missing something?
@aginger491 Everything inside the ship moves slower compared to the *static* outside system /universe.
In other words things.."decay" as you put it slower inside than outside. The higher the speed the bigger the difference.Time will always dilate or contract to keep light speed constant.
Although....recent research has shown that in some circumastances light speed might not be that constant as we thought.
@aginger491 Everything would travel at the same time speed for the conditions that they are in as compared to everything else in those same conditions. That slowing down is compared to the brother on Earth. The spaceman brother wouldn't see himself as slowing down. Due to time slowing down for him, he would see his "stationary" Earth brother as slowing down. That's how I understand it. Correct me if I'm wrong.
@ProperLogicalDebate You are in fact wrong. The "space traveller" would se his brother on earth growing old while he himself stay young, Thus the speed of which time occurs for his brother on earth isn't slowing down, rather, its speeding up, relatively compared to himself.
If time slows down for those travelling near the speed of light, logically for those on board, everything else speeds up.
@svthho Perhaps I miswrote. I was answering the question of body decay vs. clock speed when I wrote "Everything would travel at the same time speed for the conditions that they are in as compared to everything else in those same conditions" if that is what you're writing about.
From the earth brother point of view, the space brother's heart would slow down. To the space brother, his heart beats normal compared to his thought speed & clock which are both slowed down. 18 characters left.
@svthho Wouldn't the space brother, from his point of view, see the earth pull away at great speed & his brother slowing down and not age at his rate. Each sees the other as slowing down because each can consider themselves as datum, stable, while the other is moving away. The same would apply if two spaceships going in opposite directions at half light speed were able to look at each other. There is no reference except the observer. That's how I understand it.
Generation ships go one way. No return. Start a whole new world for their children, and their childrens children. Provide a backup if the Sun or anything else harms the Earth.
Anything that long near a gravity well would distrort it.
With all that energy, if the efficiency wasn't very close to 100% getting rid of waste heat would be a big problem.
As you go faster, distances to heart beats increase, time seems to slow down as viewed from earth but you see things whizing by faster. The speed of thought is reached so that you can not think fast enough to avoid anything any sensor pick up. That's a problem as I see it.
Wait..How are the ship members are going to get back to Earth since it seems that thing cannot turn around nor have enough fuel to make the ride back.
You think critizising someone on their spelling is going to lessen the point they are making? Or improve your own for that matter? Who was the kid again? You are not all-knowing. We all make predictions, but that is all they will be, not facts!
No one knows if or when we will be able to use anti matter... It is not just a simple matter of producing enough of it. Containing it is the real issue here... And stop telling people they don't know shit, when know even less.
You guys... You all think you are so clever... At least Melis admits to not knowing evereything... If you knew a little about physics, you would know the conservation of energy law that states that you can't create energy out of nothing... meaning, all the antimatter we create in a lab, all the energy it produces when annihilating, will have to come from somewhere else... The lab will always use at least equal amount of energy in producing it. It is NOT an ultimate energy source.
Anyway the calculation in this video is flawed, assuming constant acceleration to 0.5c in 2 year... the first week of travel the spacecraft can only cover 434.36 million km which is only 1/10 the closest distance of Neptune from Sun. Not sure how it can travel this far in just ONE week.
this is bullshit there is no wieght in space and the is no acceleration because there is no wind/air. so you would have to push it or fly it off from earth :D
A ship that can harness anti matter can in theory achieve 98% speed of light over time but it is impossible to go at the speed of light or anything above it. But how do u stop something going close to speed of light would require immense amount of energy also.
@SolidTube911 lmao... if you can already achive going 98% speed light, trying to stop it would be simple,
Just like in some high tech fighter planes you see today, just rotate the thrusters so that it aims forward, or build additional thrusters aiming forward.
very easy stuff, pretty much common sence no offence :-)
Utter nonsense. There is ZERO evidence that time "slows down" as you approach the speed of light. What happens when you reach the speed of light? Does time just stop?
Stupid, stupid theory thought up by people with over-active imaginations. No evidence. Has this ever been tested? Nonsense, all of it.
It's probably difficult to get without a good understanding of the physics and maths involved. Did you know black holes were predicted in theory before they even observed anything like it in space? Don't be so quick to throw away something you don't understand.
On a side note, if Einstein is right, anything with rest mass cannot even reach the speed of light.
@kramnodd9 lol, are you trolling? You realise that everything you're slating is special relativity, right? The concrete science without which all GPS systems would not work?
This is mainstream science that's been around for decades, agrees with countless experiments and is supported by mountains of evidence. And yes, at the speed of light, time stops. Photons are actually frozen in time.
<-- Astrophysics undergraduate. Probably wasting my time because I don't think you're serious.
@pixelspring It is close minded thoughts like this that stunt innovation and exploration. If we think it is dumb or impossible we would never try and we would just be stuck here doing nothing and give up on all that is available to learn. It can happen. It is possible if we would just stop thinking of ourselves as the most important thing out there.
@Copes12 The most closed minded thoughts that persist upon this planet are the ones that pour billions of dollars into space research, hi tech weaponry and war. As a species we are as stretched out in thinking as this stupid concept of building a bigger rocket to go someplace else in the galaxy. Until we solve the human condition of greed and separation from ourselves and nature itself it is idiocy to waste mental energy attempting such ridiculous endeavors b4 fixing things here.
Thats simply because they do stuff for cheap. That in NO WAY means that china is taking over. China makes American stuff for them. Its not THEIR products. They dont own it those things at all.
ATM china relies on American economy for now. If Americas light goes out right now. Chinas development will dramatically slow down.
@lausangio Because you would be going so close to the speed of light if you ran up the ship your speed would be added to that of the ship which without the laws of physics would mean you break the speed limit, to stop this happening time is slowed down inside the ship so you can't break the limit. And because time is slower inside the ship time moves faster outside the ship, from your perspective time would be passing quicker outside, that is how you time travel :)
@lausangio because its simple, the faster near light speed an object or object's are accelled to the slower and slower time gets for the object(s) that are being accelled.
This means its very very possible to reach other galaxies quickly, but.. there's HUGE concquences that come with this.
@FrostbitexP That‘s true. Cause I'm a Chinese and i live in China now, I can tell you that at least 10% of Chinese believe that china should govern the world. I think it's the result of brainwashing education. Maybe conquer the world is obsolete but I'm just telling the truth. Luckily it will never happen. No matter how powerful you heard about china, it's not true. China is all about lies. And science can not developed on lies
This does not make sense! We cannot travel into time other than warping or man made black holes. Think about it, weather you run to work or walk, the same time had elapsed. It's just that you get from A to B faster. Those numbers on your watch are fake. Time is infinite, it's the void. You can't go faster than something that it unlimited. With warp gates, you are changing the structure of your surroundings, in order to fold space and end up in another location instantly. That is the only way.
This does not make sense! We cannot travel into time other than warping or man made black holes. Think about it, weather you run to work or walk, the same time had elapsed. It's just that you get from A to B faster. Those numbers on your watch are fake. Time is infinite, it's the void. You can't go faster than something that it unlimited. With warp gates, you are changing the structure of your surroundings, in order to fold space and end up in another location instantly. That is the only way.
This does not make sense! We cannot travel into time other than warping or man made black holes. Think about it, weather you run to work or walk, the same time had elapsed. It's just that you get from A to B faster. Those numbers on your watch are fake. Time is infinite, it's the void. You can't go faster than something that it unlimited. With warp gates, you are changing the structure of your surroundings, in order to fold space and end up in another location instantly. That is the only way.
This does not make sense! We cannot travel into time other than warping or man made black holes. Think about it, weather you run to work or walk, the same time had elapsed. It's just that you get from A to B faster. Those numbers on your watch are fake. Time is infinite, it's the void. You can't go faster than something that it unlimited. With warp gates, you are changing the structure of your surroundings, in order to fold space and end up in another location instantly. That is the only way.
Antimatter is very fast, but not as fast as light speed. We just began to capture just single atoms of antimatter. We need about a ton of it to take us to far distances. It is efficient and extremely powerful. But very difficult, and expensive to make. A fuel going at the speed of light goes at 186,000 miles a second. We would need an enormous amount of energy to get to the nearest habitable planet within our lifetime. It would probably take us about another 500 years to develop that technology.
@ht448 Yes, but you would not be able to coast to slow down in deep space like on Earth without gravity and friction. Or at least that's what my logic tells me.
theres no way any physical thing made up of mater can ever go past light sped, since its almost like a game, the system knows your aproaching light speed, so instead of stoping you it does it passively, it slows time down for the object(s) going near light speed.
also its mathematicaly imposible for matter to go past light speed,
This is possibly the most famous equation known to man e= mc2
@llparasitell I never said it could go past light speed. I was asking how it would slow down after approaching near light speed. And actually one form of matter can go faster than the speed of light. It is a type of neutrino discovered at the CERN center. Look it up.
@1977ritchiemohammed obviously not for a few centuries, but new sorces of energy are opening the doors, new energy sorces such as anti-matter (the untimate sorce of energy)
since it has a 100% energy sorce output, we can already make this but only in single atoms.
@melis256 While I am not an expert on the subject of transforming one kind of energy into another, what I do know is that, even if antimatter is "merely" a battery it would still go a long way in improving everything related to spacetech.
The weight of antimatter is much lighter than traditional batteries made of metals and any other high energy substances like gasoline. Ariane 5 weighs almost 800ton with a payload of only 21ton, balance out these figures more evenly and, well...
Yes, indeed it would include much more efficiency but the safety if you loose power to the containment is absolutely zero, all your fuel will annihilate together with you and your spaceship.
Therefore the future is fusion until we come up with something even better.
@melis256 Well no shit, Murphy law is basically saying, there's a chance that everything has a small chance of failure, you going in your car has a percentage that the car will malfunction and sometimes in extreme cases blow up, when was the last time you saw a car blow up for no apparent reason? back in the 1900s we have now perfected motor engines. there's a small chance of failure in everything we do, that has no relevance to antimatter.
No, I am certainly not but you should know that depending on the amount of anti-matter contained the explosion can be of any size.
So lets say that all cars were fueled with anti-matter, what would happen if the containment field failed on one car? Wouldn't it create an explosion which hits the nearby cars which then gets destroyed and you start over again? Chain reaction much, "lmao"...
@melis256 lol? Do you even know what Murphy's law is ?Murphy's law has no relevance to this topic. Its a common logical understanding. That there's always a chance that something can and will go wrong.
Just like you using your computer, if your computer has the ability to break, it simply means your computer has the potential to break at any given time.
Same goes with your cell phone and everything that you see around you.
What I am saying here is that even small accidents can lead to big disasters, and especially if you would deal with such hazardous and at the same time fragile substances as anti-matter.
I don't know if you know but, you don't spill even a milliscopic amount of anti-matter without a substantially destructive explosion.
Today, when shit goes haywire, fuel tanks fortunately don't blow up with nuclear warhead potential.
My point is that you seem to think that we somehow will be able to one day turn anti-matter as safe as gasoline. But no, no matter how advanced we ever get we will never be able to prevent the annihilation of matter when it collide with the anti-mater.
No matter the case, anti-matter will always annihilate when touching matter.. there is no way around that. So it better never be dropped or you know what happen.
Most of the time, I like to look optimistic on stuff, but in this case there is just that high risk flaw which means it will never be implemented into any planetary application, no one wants a nuclear accident worse than every former example combined.
18 months?? are you kidding me? The first anti proton was confirmed produced in 1955, only recently we have bee able to combine single atoms with positrons and all, and been able to trap them.
How is my logic "messed up", I only state the truth.
i exceeded the speed limit that day when my mom caught me watching porn
56theincredible 12 hours ago 3
so umm..... how exactly would you stop that thing?
WafflesIsTheStuff 1 day ago
A day for space is 1 year for earth.
MultiYman 2 days ago
My science teacher told me, There will be one like this in another possibly in another 500 or 300 years i think? he told me ;o
MultiYman 2 days ago
@MultiYman It will probably be close to or after 500 years since predictions are often early and rosy. Look at the predictions for the 1962 Seattle Century 21 Worlds Fair. how do you like your flying cars?
Ever see the cartoon of an island slowly sinking? Someone sees it and builds a boat while others ignore untill they build rafts, floating things, or have to tread water. We probably don't have to worry about needing such a spaceship as in the video right now. Probably.
ProperLogicalDebate 2 days ago
Would someone on another planet see the light show as this ship passed by? How about if they were on another ship going the same direction, at a right angle, or in the opposite direction. I googled "What would you see if travelling near speed of light?" and got many videos. Most were at or beyond light speed.
ProperLogicalDebate 3 days ago
Stephen Hawking is a real boss. Just because he is disabled does not mean he is a freak. Fuck all u haters
Titan5774 3 days ago
hawking he is atheist
SuperAntiatheist 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
w w w.x-files.4rumer.c o m
A lot of videos on YouTube are interesting and they generate a lot of heated discussion, but most times you need more than the 500 characters provided by YouTube to write your comment. Pressed by the limit of characters that can be written in one comment, you could write something useless or unfinished.
Because of this I created a new forum to provide a home for discussion of YouTube videos.
Please spread the word!!!
w w w.x-files.4rumer.c o m
GerulaThor 3 days ago in playlist ALIEN GODS
The Lorentz effect would compress time onboard the ship as well. The estimated 5 year onboard duration to Alpha Centauri would be shortened to 3.4 or therabouts. So cold sleep may not be needed, esp if ways are found to generate food and recycle water. The main thing is keeping the delta V within reason for the mass of fuel needed.
sealforvr 3 days ago in playlist Favorite videos
@Lordshire1 am i their lost brother..? really dont know...
rochedoxxx 4 days ago
At 1:58 I notice that the arms move away in different directions to neutralize torque but don't see anything that would prevent the longitudinal arms coming in due to the change in center of mass caused by the amrs motion.
ProperLogicalDebate 5 days ago
Although Wikipedia says that Hyrum Graff of "Ender's Game" stayed in stasis for 10 months out of a year in order to live longer, I remember something about him being on a spaceship going in a loop while at near light speed and using an Answerable for communications to Earth.
ProperLogicalDebate 5 days ago
says the guy that cant climb a side walk!
jimbob202019 5 days ago
It's amazing to think what we'll achieve and discover in the future.
hindleyfc 6 days ago
i got a bike that can pass the 4th dimension
rochedoxxx 6 days ago
@rochedoxxx is that what pink floyd said..;)
Lordshire1 5 days ago
Ironically this isn't really 'good' enough though is it. I mean someone who IS smarter than Stephen Hawkings will come along, teams of people will better this by far, I think unless you can achive something like start trek or starwars that its never going to quite be GOOD enough, though it would be a pretty good fucking start on anything we already have.. though at that speed, I would be a little worried about hitting... I don't know... something tiny?
EpikCyAnid 1 week ago
@EpikCyAnid Haven't even gotten into life support needs. The alternative to speed is a generation ship where you are trading speed for time in transit, and maybe little or no gravity. More time to hit something that could puncher & from different directions than just forward. Like tank armor, protection would not be the same in every direction.
ProperLogicalDebate 5 days ago
that's bullshit. 1. nothing can travel that fast.. why? logically speaking, every part of spaceship would evaporate, because protons and neutron that build atoms wouldn't have enough energy to keep its electrons on their orbits.. the speed of electrons that spin around itsnucleus is 3 times slower than speed of light.. that is logical.
Lordshire1 1 week ago
@Lordshire1 So your saying your smarter than Stephen Hawking......i dont buy it
BrandonAnderson8002 1 week ago
@BrandonAnderson8002 I'm not selling it. I'm only saying what is real, I just would be surprised if atoms would survive untouched in a space vacuum traveling with a speed of light.. why? because out there is nothing traveling faster than light.. logical.
mind you, the whole staff along with electromagnetic waves that is thrown out of the Sun never exceed the speed of light..
Lordshire1 5 days ago
@Lordshire1 Space isn't a vacuum. There are atoms out there. That is why there are shock waves when a star goes nova or supernova. I remember but am not sure if true that real space has about one atom in every square yard. Whatever it is, if you're going fast enough there will be drag and each particle hitting will have a lot of energy to disapate. More like fewer stinging hail hitting then a gentle breaze on your arm and airfoiled hand outside the car window at 30MPH.
ProperLogicalDebate 3 days ago
@ProperLogicalDebate with all due to respect.. please, do some revision about a vacuum..
vacuum consists of the whole rubbish (read:periodic table of elements + others) you can possibly imagine..
Lordshire1 3 days ago
@Lordshire1 As I remember, someone was saying that the vacuum of space is empty. Either that or I just pointed out that there are things out there. Atoms was sufficient for my point & I didn't include other things since I had made my point. You're right in that there are many things out there. More than just an atoms in some volumn of space.
ProperLogicalDebate 3 days ago
@Lordshire1 They have gotten protrons, electrons & neutrons going real fast in colliders, CERN for one, but I don't know of any atom, meaning hydrogen or deuterium going that fast. I have heard it since childhood that electrons were in orbit but I understand it that they just pop up here and there at different spots in a "shell" or move to different "shells". No orbital velosity involved. Please correct me if I'm wrong. I heard of an experiment with FasterThen Light particle travel.
ProperLogicalDebate 1 week ago
@ProperLogicalDebate CERN recently confirmed some particles did "seem" to go FTL. They aren't sure if it is really the case or just miscalculation but if it's true then a 4th dimension may be involved so as to not defy the laws of nature.
cr4yv3n 5 days ago
@cr4yv3n Laws of nature as we know them. What would a roman general think of a pair of childrens two way radio? We don't know everything. We can't assume that we will be abot to solve every problem, or that we can't solve a problem.
For a moment assume that aliens are visiting Earth. The Centari might give us this, Valcans that, but watch out for the Klingons or whoever might want the resources including slaves.
ProperLogicalDebate 5 days ago
@ProperLogicalDebate I'm talking about the real world here not "klingons" or whatever - let me know when you return to Earth <.<
cr4yv3n 5 days ago
@cr4yv3n The subject was aliens visiting earth. Rather than explaining each possibility I took an example from science fiction of each. I couldn't think of the name of the aliens in the movie "Independance Day" to describe those that would come, take, destroy, leave nothing, so I used Klingon. Sorry if that offends anyone. Other examples are "The day the Earth stood still" which was self protection from Earth wars spreading to them. All fiction (for the moment) & probably won't happen.
ProperLogicalDebate 3 days ago
@ProperLogicalDebate It was easier to understand if you had said without Sci-fi elements, as i have seen the segment in which he comments about the outcome of an alien encounter would end up "just like the american indians meeting the conquistadores".
cr4yv3n 3 days ago
@cr4yv3n I am reading "1491" about the american indians before Columbus but that's another subject. Eventually I hope to get to "1492" about after Columbus. All this is another subject.
ProperLogicalDebate 3 days ago
@ProperLogicalDebate Yes, CERN does it, but single electrons.. not atoms, never heard about it nevertheless. And yes, electrons jump from one orbit to another within the same atom or within different atoms, depending on the attraction of one atom to another. You can clearly notice that some atoms doesn't react with each other, and some react very rapidly.. and this only depends on the mass of the nucleus(protons:neutrons) and the number of electrons and orbits (or shells)
Lordshire1 5 days ago
@ProperLogicalDebate moreover, the speed of electrons spinning around the nucleus of any atom or jumping from one orbit to another is about 1/3 of the speed of light.. and that is everything I remember from my primary school..;) I had some chemistry in secondary and university but it's mainly consisted of spectrophotometry and the applications of it within different areas of science..
Lordshire1 5 days ago
@ProperLogicalDebate and Yes, they thought they found something that goes faster that light, but just recently I've heard that they made a mistake.. ;) BUT I am pretty sure that there is something faster than the light, and there are so many things going on in the space that we don't know about.
I've read somewhere about Japanese scientists' experiment deep underground that indicated that there is something that going through the everything without damaging it.
Lordshire1 5 days ago
@Lordshire1 Neutrinos don't react with other things, particles & atoms, much so that they can go through the earth quite easily and be detected while coming up from below. That is my understanding..
ProperLogicalDebate 5 days ago
Just as sail, find something already there that you don't have to carry. Not solar sails for 2 reasons. Interstellar space has no bright stars near by. Sails can be damaged by cannonballs and really fast small things.
What is dark energy? Is there really no aether? Other things?
ProperLogicalDebate 1 week ago
Then there is navigation, distortion due to speed, and because you are so fast with sensor range and thinking time, there might not be time to avoid something really bad. Sensor range might be helped with probes being sent off ahead.
Repeaters dropped off every so often might help keep communications if an Answerable Instantanious Communications System isn't developed. (Some variation of what was used in the Orson Scott Card Ender series)
Just as sail preceded steam to power ships, so finding...
ProperLogicalDebate 1 week ago
As it moves through space, it hits things very fast which causes drag. Not like holding your arm out the window of a moving car. More like sand from a sanding truck banging really fast. Instead of shielding and bouncing atoms away, how about capturing that energy and recycle part of it's heat?
Another problem is turning it around to put the engines forward and risking all that damage there. Probably best to stop engines and coast to a safe speed, if there is one, before turning around.
ProperLogicalDebate 1 week ago
you better put first song called power or i will fuck you within an hour
fuck you you fuckin cunt
eat a nigger dick you olden dazer and fuck you and eat your ass.piss,love and happy ass
you fucking fishdick chimp porchmonkey cotton picking jew dyke jackson (coz you fuck children in their anus)
rocket to the dick that helps you talk in your mouth with aids semen you fucking midget faggot asian nigger with aids already from before. in your ear enourmous emission from my mother love
abhorion 1 week ago
3:13 Que the Doctor who opening theme.
JBICK666 1 week ago
I JUST LOVE THIS VIDEO... DON*T YOU AGREE
mroverkill135 1 week ago
Is any one know the name of the music @ 2:30??
bmpereira100 1 week ago
@DawnPwnr Troll fight! Troll fight! Troll fight!
This isn't only directed at you but to everyone else involved in your flame war. I don't care who started it. I calls em as I see em, so no hard feelings. Guess I'm the troll now arent I? X)
aginger491 1 week ago
@aginger491 whos even fighting ? , look at the date that was like few weeks ago -_-
DawnPwner 5 days ago
Although that slows down the relative time, wouldn't humans still decompose at the same rate as on earth? What I'm getting at is that yes the clock slows down, but everything else goes at the same speed. Or am I missing something?
aginger491 1 week ago
@aginger491 Everything inside the ship moves slower compared to the *static* outside system /universe.
In other words things.."decay" as you put it slower inside than outside. The higher the speed the bigger the difference.Time will always dilate or contract to keep light speed constant.
Although....recent research has shown that in some circumastances light speed might not be that constant as we thought.
cr4yv3n 1 week ago
@aginger491 Everything would travel at the same time speed for the conditions that they are in as compared to everything else in those same conditions. That slowing down is compared to the brother on Earth. The spaceman brother wouldn't see himself as slowing down. Due to time slowing down for him, he would see his "stationary" Earth brother as slowing down. That's how I understand it. Correct me if I'm wrong.
ProperLogicalDebate 1 week ago
@ProperLogicalDebate You are in fact wrong. The "space traveller" would se his brother on earth growing old while he himself stay young, Thus the speed of which time occurs for his brother on earth isn't slowing down, rather, its speeding up, relatively compared to himself.
If time slows down for those travelling near the speed of light, logically for those on board, everything else speeds up.
svthho 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@svthho Perhaps I miswrote. I was answering the question of body decay vs. clock speed when I wrote "Everything would travel at the same time speed for the conditions that they are in as compared to everything else in those same conditions" if that is what you're writing about.
From the earth brother point of view, the space brother's heart would slow down. To the space brother, his heart beats normal compared to his thought speed & clock which are both slowed down. 18 characters left.
ProperLogicalDebate 1 week ago
@svthho Wouldn't the space brother, from his point of view, see the earth pull away at great speed & his brother slowing down and not age at his rate. Each sees the other as slowing down because each can consider themselves as datum, stable, while the other is moving away. The same would apply if two spaceships going in opposite directions at half light speed were able to look at each other. There is no reference except the observer. That's how I understand it.
ProperLogicalDebate 1 week ago
khayali pulao.......:D:D:D:D:D
kundarvankumar 1 week ago
Anyone knows the name of the music?
bmpereira100 1 week ago
@bmpereira100 This is closest i could find
/watch?v=bjlBCAx6330
Still doesn't sound as cool as in this clip though :S
cr4yv3n 1 week ago
@cr4yv3n : Thank you but actually I know the begin cause I like TSFH...but I will be curious the other part of the music which start 2.30
bmpereira100 1 week ago
unfortunately i won't live long enough to see this happening.. T-T
AmirulAlias 1 week ago 4
@AmirulAlias we never know how we might turn out after death
oceano901 22 hours ago
@oceano901
maybe the speed of death is greater than speed of light.. so you actually are not dead.. HURRDURR
EdTheBadass 6 hours ago
You'll probably need a really really big parachute to slow that down
elvisflorian 1 week ago
is this real plz inbox me tellin gif true
coolcooljoe1 1 week ago
why dosent hawking have his own channel? he could make videos everyday...
evanlion64 1 week ago 19
@evanlion64 Making a simple sentence takes about 5 minutes for him.
DGHProductions 1 week ago
@DGHProductions ok :(
evanlion64 1 week ago
@evanlion64 would be 500 times squared better than the crap they play on discovery now!
TheDogondone 6 days ago
Comment removed
ProperLogicalDebate 1 week ago
Generation ships go one way. No return. Start a whole new world for their children, and their childrens children. Provide a backup if the Sun or anything else harms the Earth.
ProperLogicalDebate 1 week ago
Anything that long near a gravity well would distrort it.
With all that energy, if the efficiency wasn't very close to 100% getting rid of waste heat would be a big problem.
As you go faster, distances to heart beats increase, time seems to slow down as viewed from earth but you see things whizing by faster. The speed of thought is reached so that you can not think fast enough to avoid anything any sensor pick up. That's a problem as I see it.
ProperLogicalDebate 1 week ago
Wait..How are the ship members are going to get back to Earth since it seems that thing cannot turn around nor have enough fuel to make the ride back.
DerpinWin 1 week ago
We can't even land or get to mars why are they thinking to got somewhere else
00legoman00 1 week ago
@00legoman00 Why not. Its called dreaming. We're allowed to.
DerpinWin 1 week ago
Nice video....i hope we can build that cause i wana learn more bout the universe
zackd713 1 week ago 9
Travelling at these speeds
90% speed of light. You travel in time at twice the normal rate
99% speed of light You travel a year in time in a single day.
99.99999 speed of light. You outlive the universe!
hmwm67 1 week ago
dear santa..
kobukankingkona 1 week ago
You think critizising someone on their spelling is going to lessen the point they are making? Or improve your own for that matter? Who was the kid again? You are not all-knowing. We all make predictions, but that is all they will be, not facts!
No one knows if or when we will be able to use anti matter... It is not just a simple matter of producing enough of it. Containing it is the real issue here... And stop telling people they don't know shit, when know even less.
svthho 2 weeks ago
@svthho
Empty barrels rumble the most, especially when you try to fill them.
melis256 5 days ago
You guys... You all think you are so clever... At least Melis admits to not knowing evereything... If you knew a little about physics, you would know the conservation of energy law that states that you can't create energy out of nothing... meaning, all the antimatter we create in a lab, all the energy it produces when annihilating, will have to come from somewhere else... The lab will always use at least equal amount of energy in producing it. It is NOT an ultimate energy source.
svthho 2 weeks ago
OOPS! my bad, we crashed into the sun
spacegeek25 2 weeks ago
travel sickness
spacegeek25 2 weeks ago
3...2...1...I FARTED!!! Erm, hello mars
spacegeek25 2 weeks ago
6 people are gay and dumb
spacegeek25 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Anyway the calculation in this video is flawed, assuming constant acceleration to 0.5c in 2 year... the first week of travel the spacecraft can only cover 434.36 million km which is only 1/10 the closest distance of Neptune from Sun. Not sure how it can travel this far in just ONE week.
Gattberserk 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Gattberserk I mean closest distance of Neptune to Earth. 4.35 billion km apprx
Gattberserk 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Anyone know the soundtrack they use for the first minute of the film?
Gattberserk 2 weeks ago
dammit i want to see more!! IS THAT ALL OF IT!!??
BlackOpAim 2 weeks ago
Haha the ship went weeeeeehhh
BlackYankee1910 2 weeks ago
this is bullshit there is no wieght in space and the is no acceleration because there is no wind/air. so you would have to push it or fly it off from earth :D
musicvsvirus 2 weeks ago
@musicvsvirusthere there does not need to be air to make something accelerate or have force!
oOliamchesterOo 2 weeks ago
@musicvsvirus LOL !!! is this kid a joke? LMAO
bro, either you are like 12 years old which is ok, I will forgive u or you are 18 years old with absolutely no education XD!!!
no offence but u just made me lmao, u better be trolling.
llparasitell 2 weeks ago
thats some big shit there...
90000UTube 2 weeks ago
A ship that can harness anti matter can in theory achieve 98% speed of light over time but it is impossible to go at the speed of light or anything above it. But how do u stop something going close to speed of light would require immense amount of energy also.
SolidTube911 2 weeks ago
@SolidTube911 lmao... if you can already achive going 98% speed light, trying to stop it would be simple,
Just like in some high tech fighter planes you see today, just rotate the thrusters so that it aims forward, or build additional thrusters aiming forward.
very easy stuff, pretty much common sence no offence :-)
llparasitell 2 weeks ago
why are they using the radio chatter from gta2?!?!?!?
Santr4 2 weeks ago
we need to make light speed
storeguy333 2 weeks ago
THIS CRAZY SPEED IS MADNESS!!!!!
icars98 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
melis256 2 weeks ago
@llparasitell
lol, I see.. I think it is better to use fusion for now ;)
melis256 2 weeks ago
Now where are we going to find all this fuel?
FSGeek45 2 weeks ago
nasa can do it, with a budget increase lol
sasukesan767 2 weeks ago
Utter nonsense. There is ZERO evidence that time "slows down" as you approach the speed of light. What happens when you reach the speed of light? Does time just stop?
Stupid, stupid theory thought up by people with over-active imaginations. No evidence. Has this ever been tested? Nonsense, all of it.
kramnodd9 2 weeks ago in playlist Liked videos
@kramnodd9
It's probably difficult to get without a good understanding of the physics and maths involved. Did you know black holes were predicted in theory before they even observed anything like it in space? Don't be so quick to throw away something you don't understand.
On a side note, if Einstein is right, anything with rest mass cannot even reach the speed of light.
dunnono00 2 weeks ago
@dunnono00 not just black holes, MANY discoveries were theorized and discovered in mathematics before science or the actual discovery.
^^
llparasitell 2 weeks ago
@kramnodd9 lol, are you trolling? You realise that everything you're slating is special relativity, right? The concrete science without which all GPS systems would not work?
This is mainstream science that's been around for decades, agrees with countless experiments and is supported by mountains of evidence. And yes, at the speed of light, time stops. Photons are actually frozen in time.
<-- Astrophysics undergraduate. Probably wasting my time because I don't think you're serious.
AleximusMaximus 2 weeks ago
utter fiction all of it. pretty pictures though. Squirting our way across the galaxy is so dumb.
pixelspring 3 weeks ago
@pixelspring It is close minded thoughts like this that stunt innovation and exploration. If we think it is dumb or impossible we would never try and we would just be stuck here doing nothing and give up on all that is available to learn. It can happen. It is possible if we would just stop thinking of ourselves as the most important thing out there.
Copes12 2 weeks ago
@Copes12 The most closed minded thoughts that persist upon this planet are the ones that pour billions of dollars into space research, hi tech weaponry and war. As a species we are as stretched out in thinking as this stupid concept of building a bigger rocket to go someplace else in the galaxy. Until we solve the human condition of greed and separation from ourselves and nature itself it is idiocy to waste mental energy attempting such ridiculous endeavors b4 fixing things here.
pixelspring 2 weeks ago
@pixelspring
I completely agree. At long last, someone here with a brain. Humans will wipe themselves out before they spread their disease to other star systems.
kramnodd9 2 weeks ago in playlist Liked videos
TRUE!!!!
infact its already starting CHINA IS TAKING OVER THE WORLD
shoes=made in china
Toys=made in china
clothes=china
jackets=china
schools hospitals and other buildings etc...=made in china
Seriously?
I would die for that.
Pramimade 3 weeks ago
@Pramimade
Thats simply because they do stuff for cheap. That in NO WAY means that china is taking over. China makes American stuff for them. Its not THEIR products. They dont own it those things at all.
ATM china relies on American economy for now. If Americas light goes out right now. Chinas development will dramatically slow down.
FrostbitexP 3 weeks ago
And when the come back there will be nothing every city on the earth would have been nuked
feegeeish 3 weeks ago
One rock at those speeds and its all over Lol
FrostbitexP 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
God created the universe.
MrURFAN 3 weeks ago
After this were will the space ship reach
supermanxdism 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
what is this bullshit ? i don't see how speed could interfere with time ! This is crap !
1 hour at 300mph or at light speed does't effect time :) it effect only distance !!
What is this non sense ??!!
cerveauxelectriques 3 weeks ago
who does this animations and scenarios.... these are fuking awsome
shis0striker 3 weeks ago
I don't get it. So if I was on that and 1 year on earth passed, it would actually be 1 day? How does that work?
lausangio 3 weeks ago
@lausangio see time dilation on wikipedia
neuron1618 3 weeks ago
@lausangio Because you would be going so close to the speed of light if you ran up the ship your speed would be added to that of the ship which without the laws of physics would mean you break the speed limit, to stop this happening time is slowed down inside the ship so you can't break the limit. And because time is slower inside the ship time moves faster outside the ship, from your perspective time would be passing quicker outside, that is how you time travel :)
bradleyboy36 3 weeks ago
@lausangio because its simple, the faster near light speed an object or object's are accelled to the slower and slower time gets for the object(s) that are being accelled.
This means its very very possible to reach other galaxies quickly, but.. there's HUGE concquences that come with this.
llparasitell 3 weeks ago
Americans, your country is bankrupt. It will be the Chinese who rule the Earth and Space in
the 21st century. hahaha!
Learn to speak chinese, you will need it.
browneyes4 3 weeks ago
@browneyes4
Im planning to bud ^_^
Wonder what country will take over after china...meh doesnt matter, ill be dead :D
FrostbitexP 3 weeks ago
@browneyes4
But seriously, if china becomes the new top super power...the world might be a even more horrible place -_-
FrostbitexP 3 weeks ago
@FrostbitexP That‘s true. Cause I'm a Chinese and i live in China now, I can tell you that at least 10% of Chinese believe that china should govern the world. I think it's the result of brainwashing education. Maybe conquer the world is obsolete but I'm just telling the truth. Luckily it will never happen. No matter how powerful you heard about china, it's not true. China is all about lies. And science can not developed on lies
MichaelHsiehTAIGXB 3 weeks ago
looks complicated
MrNestaas 3 weeks ago
How would you come to a stop?
TheySeeMeTrollin1000 3 weeks ago
@TheySeeMeTrollin1000 very easily with a decelerator of some sort.
llparasitell 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This does not make sense! We cannot travel into time other than warping or man made black holes. Think about it, weather you run to work or walk, the same time had elapsed. It's just that you get from A to B faster. Those numbers on your watch are fake. Time is infinite, it's the void. You can't go faster than something that it unlimited. With warp gates, you are changing the structure of your surroundings, in order to fold space and end up in another location instantly. That is the only way.
punkchica619 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This does not make sense! We cannot travel into time other than warping or man made black holes. Think about it, weather you run to work or walk, the same time had elapsed. It's just that you get from A to B faster. Those numbers on your watch are fake. Time is infinite, it's the void. You can't go faster than something that it unlimited. With warp gates, you are changing the structure of your surroundings, in order to fold space and end up in another location instantly. That is the only way.
punkchica619 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This does not make sense! We cannot travel into time other than warping or man made black holes. Think about it, weather you run to work or walk, the same time had elapsed. It's just that you get from A to B faster. Those numbers on your watch are fake. Time is infinite, it's the void. You can't go faster than something that it unlimited. With warp gates, you are changing the structure of your surroundings, in order to fold space and end up in another location instantly. That is the only way.
punkchica619 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This does not make sense! We cannot travel into time other than warping or man made black holes. Think about it, weather you run to work or walk, the same time had elapsed. It's just that you get from A to B faster. Those numbers on your watch are fake. Time is infinite, it's the void. You can't go faster than something that it unlimited. With warp gates, you are changing the structure of your surroundings, in order to fold space and end up in another location instantly. That is the only way.
punkchica619 3 weeks ago
Goosebumps***
punkchica619 3 weeks ago
This is really inspiring!!!
punkchica619 3 weeks ago
I WANT TO FUTURE!! NOW!!!
zledislav 3 weeks ago
Antimatter is very fast, but not as fast as light speed. We just began to capture just single atoms of antimatter. We need about a ton of it to take us to far distances. It is efficient and extremely powerful. But very difficult, and expensive to make. A fuel going at the speed of light goes at 186,000 miles a second. We would need an enormous amount of energy to get to the nearest habitable planet within our lifetime. It would probably take us about another 500 years to develop that technology.
JimmysFinest 3 weeks ago
@JimmysFinest what do you mean by anti matter is not fast?
Anti matter is an energy sorce, not a speed.. -_-
this is what you are saying, gasoline is not fast.
Gasoline is not a speed, it can be used to fuel rockets going at 25,000 mile per hour
or cars going at 100 miles per hour.
As for anti matter it is the perfext form or energy storage, since when used it relases 100% of energy to matter.
If you had anti matter equal to the size of one penny, you can launch a space shuttle 60 times.
llparasitell 3 weeks ago
So how does it slow down?
sneezeachoo1 3 weeks ago 12
@sneezeachoo1 ... good Question lol I guess they would have to work out when to cut the engine and drift for like 4 years to slow down or something
ht448 3 weeks ago
@ht448 Yes, but you would not be able to coast to slow down in deep space like on Earth without gravity and friction. Or at least that's what my logic tells me.
sneezeachoo1 3 weeks ago
@sneezeachoo1 Then Magic!
ht448 3 weeks ago
@ht448 no not exactly , you could very well rotate the accelorators to aim it so that it decellorates, just like some jet fighters can do today.
llparasitell 3 weeks ago
@sneezeachoo1 It doesnt :p
vamsterr 3 weeks ago
@sneezeachoo1 just press the brake
josephwlm 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@sneezeachoo1
theres no way any physical thing made up of mater can ever go past light sped, since its almost like a game, the system knows your aproaching light speed, so instead of stoping you it does it passively, it slows time down for the object(s) going near light speed.
also its mathematicaly imposible for matter to go past light speed,
This is possibly the most famous equation known to man e= mc2
llparasitell 3 weeks ago
@llparasitell I never said it could go past light speed. I was asking how it would slow down after approaching near light speed. And actually one form of matter can go faster than the speed of light. It is a type of neutrino discovered at the CERN center. Look it up.
sneezeachoo1 3 weeks ago
Can anti- gravity propulsion work together with trust propulsion on this particular design ?
So you won't need the support rods release on take-off.
1977ritchiemohammed 4 weeks ago
Can we have an estimate on when this technology would be available, 100 or 200 years time?
1977ritchiemohammed 4 weeks ago
@1977ritchiemohammed Less than 100. The only problem is where are they gonna get funding for this
shawn3213 3 weeks ago
@1977ritchiemohammed obviously not for a few centuries, but new sorces of energy are opening the doors, new energy sorces such as anti-matter (the untimate sorce of energy)
since it has a 100% energy sorce output, we can already make this but only in single atoms.
llparasitell 3 weeks ago
@llparasitell
Small problem.. where do you find anti-matter?
And if you make it then it is no "energy source" as much as it is merely a container/battery.
melis256 2 weeks ago
@melis256 While I am not an expert on the subject of transforming one kind of energy into another, what I do know is that, even if antimatter is "merely" a battery it would still go a long way in improving everything related to spacetech.
The weight of antimatter is much lighter than traditional batteries made of metals and any other high energy substances like gasoline. Ariane 5 weighs almost 800ton with a payload of only 21ton, balance out these figures more evenly and, well...
svthho 2 weeks ago
@svthho
Yes, indeed it would include much more efficiency but the safety if you loose power to the containment is absolutely zero, all your fuel will annihilate together with you and your spaceship.
Therefore the future is fusion until we come up with something even better.
melis256 2 weeks ago
@melis256 Fail, anti matter by that time would be so easy to contain,
we fuckin JUST found out how to make anti matter and already
we can safely contain anti matter with strong gravitational feilds, at cern.
And how many years of technology do we have? about 200 lolz
I can assume that in a few hundred years average people would be using anti matter for every daily thing.
Containing anti matter would be as easy as containing electricity in a battery in a few centurys time.
llparasitell 2 weeks ago
@llparasitell
No matter how easy it is, there is always a small risk it will fail, Murphy law.
And then it is just, boom...
Also, FYI the antimatter at cern is held with magnetic fields since gravity manipulation is not an official field in science yet.
melis256 2 weeks ago
@melis256 Well no shit, Murphy law is basically saying, there's a chance that everything has a small chance of failure, you going in your car has a percentage that the car will malfunction and sometimes in extreme cases blow up, when was the last time you saw a car blow up for no apparent reason? back in the 1900s we have now perfected motor engines. there's a small chance of failure in everything we do, that has no relevance to antimatter.
Lmao no offence but are you retarded? -_-
llparasitell 2 weeks ago
@llparasitell
No, I am certainly not but you should know that depending on the amount of anti-matter contained the explosion can be of any size.
So lets say that all cars were fueled with anti-matter, what would happen if the containment field failed on one car? Wouldn't it create an explosion which hits the nearby cars which then gets destroyed and you start over again? Chain reaction much, "lmao"...
melis256 2 weeks ago
@melis256 lol? Do you even know what Murphy's law is ?Murphy's law has no relevance to this topic. Its a common logical understanding. That there's always a chance that something can and will go wrong.
Just like you using your computer, if your computer has the ability to break, it simply means your computer has the potential to break at any given time.
Same goes with your cell phone and everything that you see around you.
Carbosful 2 weeks ago
@Carbosful
Only that, if any of these objects fail, they do not explode in a humongous fireball because some fuel container which needs energy too has failed.
melis256 2 weeks ago
@melis256 Since when was the last time your car blew up?
Sinc when was the last time a rocket to space has blown up?
only way back in the 1980s when we were first discovering how to make space rockets.
What is your point
everything will have its failures when it is FIRST being discovered.
Over time as we advance we learn to refine out knowledge and improve our success rate.
Carbosful 2 weeks ago
@Carbosful
2003 Space Shuttle Columbia, nuff said.
What I am saying here is that even small accidents can lead to big disasters, and especially if you would deal with such hazardous and at the same time fragile substances as anti-matter.
I don't know if you know but, you don't spill even a milliscopic amount of anti-matter without a substantially destructive explosion.
Today, when shit goes haywire, fuel tanks fortunately don't blow up with nuclear warhead potential.
melis256 2 weeks ago
@melis256 you dumb ass, we just discovered how to go into space only 50 years ago, sooner or later space travel will be as safe as a car.
And in a few century's who knows we might have to fly everyday.
What is your point.
Carbosful 2 weeks ago
@Carbosful
My point is that you seem to think that we somehow will be able to one day turn anti-matter as safe as gasoline. But no, no matter how advanced we ever get we will never be able to prevent the annihilation of matter when it collide with the anti-mater.
melis256 2 weeks ago
@melis256 EPIC FAIL, we are already storing anti matter safely without any problems at cern.
dumb ass noob, One day in a few hundred years , someone will look upon this conversation and laugh at your dumb ass.
I remember back in the 1600s? people didn't think we could ever harness the power of electricity, because it was too advance for them back then
Look at how fucking stupid they look now, just like u
Carbosful 2 weeks ago
@Carbosful
No matter the case, anti-matter will always annihilate when touching matter.. there is no way around that. So it better never be dropped or you know what happen.
Most of the time, I like to look optimistic on stuff, but in this case there is just that high risk flaw which means it will never be implemented into any planetary application, no one wants a nuclear accident worse than every former example combined.
melis256 2 weeks ago
@melis256
Wrong, Cern has anti matter trapped safely as we speak, I do not think you are educated enough on this topic to have a viable debate.
Please watch
/watch?v=GoSaHiCduDc
Carbosful 2 weeks ago
@Carbosful
yes, and that annihilated in 17 minutes.
melis256 2 weeks ago
@melis256 doesnt matter, and when did we first discover how to even make anti matter?
exactly.. weve only first begun studying anti matter for 18 months?
we now can already hold it for 17 minutes.
Your logic is clearly messed up.
Carbosful 2 weeks ago
@Carbosful
18 months?? are you kidding me? The first anti proton was confirmed produced in 1955, only recently we have bee able to combine single atoms with positrons and all, and been able to trap them.
How is my logic "messed up", I only state the truth.
melis256 2 weeks ago