SICP / Whats wrong with Purely Function Paradigm / Part 2.4
8:03
Added: 5 years ago
From: ProgrammingArchive
Views: 3,593
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (8)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!

  • "cause , i , dont , have , time"

    you must love the tone of his communications

    fasteez 1 year ago

  • Obviously the maybe monad is the answer you fools! :P

    Ormaaj 1 year ago

  • For that matter, his problem seems quite well solved ten years ago by Erlang. Streams of transactions are Erlang (esp. Erlang/OTP)'s bread-and-butter.

    BMeph 3 years ago 2

  • The SICPs lessons are 20 years old. The problem raised by this video is solved by Monads, a relatively new concept in Computer Science. There is nothing wrong with purely functional languages, and Haskell is a prime example of an excellent language that can be used for research, teaching but also real world applications.

    acangiano 5 years ago 11

  • The good news is that if you want to have monads in Scheme, you can. :-)

    Tia1ko 4 years ago 6

  • schemads

    Disprofuse 3 years ago

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more