Added: 5 years ago
From: lpitube
Views: 56,153
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (471)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • One day God created the Earth, night and day, and Adam and Eve,

    Oh wait, what about dinosaurs, damn, our story is busted!!

  • @HuskyLogan

    You quite apparantly know absolutely nothing about the Bible, så either study, or be quiet. Or just keep on looking stupid on youtube. Your choice I guess.

  • @CroatianHercegovina

    To be fair, can you explain why there are no mention of dinosaurs in the bible? If God created the earth with Adam and Eve does that mean they were there before or after dinosaurs?

  • @SunshineApartmentsSL

    Do some Bible study man, if you are really interested. That question is so out of context that its laughable.

    Im one of those who read the OT as lessons. They are to be taken figuratively. And are written in such a manner. According to me. So thats why.

    The NT are facts, and proven ones to. There are more historical evidence of the events in the NT than there are of 99% of other non-biblical events that we consider to be facts.

  • @SunshineApartmentsSL

    If you dont like reading, listen to Lane Craig. A former atheist as well. Answers alot of questions, all of them alot harder and more complicated than "where are the dinosaurs"

  • Excellent explanation! If there were only more solid Priests like this....in specific, more orthodox Jesuits!(and there soon will be) God Bless!!!

  • @SeventhDayRemnant It sounds to me like YOU need to be exorcised.

  • The Pope is the Anti- christ The prophecies of the lord JESUS from daniel to revelation told us that the anti christ would come out of the divided roman empire after tis collapse,would kill Gods people,would change Gods times and laws, would exhault himself as high as Christ and would sit in the christian church and claim to be God. Only the pope did all these things and still is in power he controls the freemasons,illumanati and jesuits which all worship satan and which control the NWO

  • @paddy234

    who were the heretics?

  • @ukieflip

    Irish, Ukrainian, Latin, Roman....All Catholic.

    Hence "Catholic" from Greek "universal" or "unified". One form, the heritage refers to the social heritage that influences the atmosphere of which we practice. Now the Anglicans call themselves "Reformed Catholic" but remain out of the Vatican's catholic fold.

  • Heal...Praise the lordy..Give me your money. Almost sounds like what I say to my dog--Heel, Roll over, beg.

  • There was a Man who was possessed by the Evil spirit in Mark 5:20, so in the Book of Mark 9: 32 (NIV) which the boy was also been possessed by Demon too.But MAN! the bottom line HERE is have FAITH IN GOD through CHRIST JESUS.Be'coz he is the ONLY WAY THE TRUTH & THE LIFE !!!I truly believe that there is Good & Evil in this WORLD.Though has been proven in the Bible that this is EXORCIST during the time when JESUS CHRIST was on EARTH.

  • @NixE38j7 If you are using a NIV, you need to toss it into your garbage pail and beg God to forgive you for using a Satan-inspired counterfeit bible.

  • he actually believes in he's saying...wow!

  • It only makes sense that people would hate Jesuits. They ARE Catholic after all...

  • @Ssider im sorry but jesuits are Catholic just because they have a different charism doesnt mean that they dont have to believe what the church teaches and that is that the devil and demons are real. i love the jesuits so dont come here with your bull about the Jesuit order learn some history. Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam

  • @Skizla Quiet yourself!

  • Unfortunately the facts of this case are wrong. The boy in question never cut the priest severely, for one. We know this because the priest who performed the exorcism never missed his basketball coaching duties. In addition, the assistant exorcist does not have any recollection of supernatural events.

    I'm ashamed of this priest in a way. The Jesuit are known for scholarship, science and logic. Not for superstition.

  • What's wrong about a possessed person ? Shoot him into the head...

  • U WANT TO NO THE TRUTH ABOUT EXORCISM TYPE IN  gorilla199 the halo

  • if the priest can exorcise the demon out of the men ...why dosen't he exorcise the demons out from the earth ?. going by the large numbers of exorcisms taking place these days, it appears that the demons are jumping from one man onto the next, or can it be that we are all possesed with manifestations showing up at different times ?.

  • grrrrrrrrrr

  • Fr. Ryan. Now rest in the presence of the Lord for all Eternity! AMDG

  • William Peter Blatty made this famous. Not the Vatican. They're going from his playbook.

  • Oh of course...because William Peter Blatty didn't gather any source materials from the vatican at all...naaahhhhhhhh

  • @wjb67ii hey dork "nahh" coolguy, Blatty dug up a diary of one of his Jesuit teachers about an exorcism. He was told not to release or identify anyone. Someone did, read WEIRD magazine to find out about the real case. He was playing with the priests and Father Bowden (who Father Merrin was based on) didn't really believe the kid was possessed. So shut your fucking mouth.

  • @hopkins4545 hey thanks...I am pretty cool. Wow is Weird magazine says it is so then it MUST be true.

  • ''go back to hell satan or we werewolfs will destroy you'' coll line huh

  • nobody notices while he wants us to believe his horsecrap, his pupils are slit...HE HIS THAT WHICH HE DEPICTS!!!

  • I used to live near Mt. Rainier and I also knew a LOT OF BAD BOYS on PCP who went to the high school where I was sent and a ton of bikers called "Pagans"......let's see...it would be back in 1971...when I saw those there. They created "bussing" for segregation of whites and blacks and there was lack of education and theft and stories at the new school in the worst section of DC, but I was actually safer there, probably due to the drug possession in Bladensburg, Mt. Rainier, etc. All Maryland USA

  • Mental illness doesn't cause super human strength, obviously. That is what we call "paranormal."

  • @Neurolanis Because the priest is giving you secondhand information, doesn't mean the information is correct. There is no evidence that everything he said happened.

  • Mental illness can cause freakishly strong people. The power of the human mind. Some people even believe others are really posessed. But its mental or other types of illness.

  • If you read the right history books, you'll find that a lot of people who were considered to be "possessed" were actually poisoned with toxic componds such as arsenic, or worst yet, ergot, a disease that was common in grains and flour prior to agricultural chemicals.

    As for Rolland, i would suspect he may have been poisoned. I played with a Ouiji board for years, I don't think I'm possesed. A plastic toy from Sears does not contain "devils."

  • The boy's name was not Rolland. Why was his name changed? Had anyone thought of contacting a doctor or shrink?

  • they should have contacted a drug dealer and a travel agent and got that kid the fuck out of the irish catholic complex

  • agreed!

  • I believe in this!

  • piszczeck is right. St Michael drove the devil out of the boy when the Blessed Mother enpowered the delivery, Fr. Bowdern was not sure if the exorcism was successful, he made a secret prayer "in the name of Dominus" and required Rolland to acknowledge the delivery, years later, Rolland wrote to Fr. Bowdern that he had a dream, in the dream St. Michael drove the devil out from the boy in the Name of Dominus. Only then, Fr. Bowdern was sure, the exorcism was completed. Peace is finally restored

  • Thank you for uploading this video. Interesting , informative and thought provoking...

  • 1949 St Louis case was an extreme case, a 13 years old boy, Rolland was introduced to ouiji board by his aunt Tellie who practiced spiritism and occult, it was beleived she had satanic possession, when she passed away in late January 49, she and other evil spirits found their home by possessing Rolland. Fr. William Bowdern took a few months to deliver Rolland, in the process, Fr. Bowdern lost 40 lbs, nothing worked, the last attempt used was a necklace filled with miracleous medals & Willpower

  • I think I remember reading that what finally worked was the St Michael the Archangel prayer, & the priest actually heard the devil shouting in terror at St Michael the Archangel as the Angel kicked him out of the boy's body.

  • Fr. Herbert Ryan is my present theology teacher. Great mind, extremely smart, and still very sharp. He's great

  • does it count, if you cross your fingers ?

  • The crucifix has great power of demonic forces. No demon can stand to look at the crucifix.

  • Satanic crucifix*

  • Pathetic. This exorcism is a fact, the boy was delivered from satanic forces, he was not a Catholic, but converted and lives to this day in peace. For the greater glory of God and the Catholic Church.

  • blahblahblah

  • Goodness, we have a sheep here!

  • blah blah?

  • I jeszcze w dodatku beczy po Polsku..

  • blahblahblah

  • Go away, muslim terrorist!

  • so true

  • Satan's storm troopers. Rome's gestapo. The Vatican's assassins.

    A quote from the late 19th century (After the Jesuits had instigated the American civil war, and prior to them instigating the Vietnam War, two World wars etc etc etc).."What a harvest of plots, tumults, seditions, revolutions, torturings, poisonings, assassinations, regicides, and massacres has Christendom reaped from the seed sown by the Jesuits! Nor can we be sure that we have yet seen the last and greatest of their crimes."

  • Islandretreat, what evidence do you have to prove your claims about the Jesuits or the crucifix? why are you so afraid of Catholicism, the original form of Christianity? If you ever want to be taken seriously I suggest that you produce evidence with your claims that could convince an unbiased observer. To be taken seriously avoid name calling, outlandish claims which you cannot prove, etc. and conduct your argument in a manner fitting to intelligent debate.

  • "Between 1555 and 1931 the Society of Jesus [i.e., the Jesuit Order] was expelled from at least 83 countries, city states and cities, for engaging in political intrigue and subversion plots against the welfare of the State, according to the records of a Jesuit priest of repute [i.e., Thomas J. Campbell]. Practically every instance of expulsion was for political intrigue, political infiltration, political subversion, and inciting to political insurrection." (1987) J. Shepherd (Canadian historian)

  • The proof is in the pudding, as they say. Popery is an after-growth of Paganism spreading its popish theology under a Christian mask.

    I'm not here to deliberately offend anyone (no doubt i have). With the invention of the internet it's time people like you were made aware of what you're getting yourself into. Just how brainwashed do you have to be to believe Ignatius Loyola was a man of God? He was one of the most evil men ever to walk the face of the earth.

  • Any particular book? J. Shepherd is a very common name. But what you fail to mention is that they were allowed back into many of the nations which cast them out. Some of these nations threw them out because they had recently became protestant or were communist and viewed Catholic priests as a threat. Others were indiginous rulers which were not fond of their subjects becoming Christian. How many countries still disallow the Jesuits? In many cases it was purely a hatred for all things Catholic.

  • Most of the countries they were expelled from were Papist countries. And in many cases they weren't 'allowed' back in, but actually sneaked back in. The Jesuits created Communism, Fascism, Nazism, and Zionism. Howver, it is true that even Communist nations viewed them as a "threat".

  • The Babington Plot: Jesuit Intrigue in Elizabethan England by J.E.C. Shepherd. It is impossible to read Elizabethan history [i.e., the history surrounding Queen Elizabeth I of England; queen: 1558-1603] except in the context of an army of Jesuits, masters of deceit, treachery, treason, infiltration, subversion, assassination, insurrection, civil war and coercion, plotting for the good of the papacy, and the defeat of all the Popes foes anywhere in the world.

  • Apologies, that was a quote from Jonas Shepherd's book and should be in inverted commas.

  • The very same Elizabeth I that executed her cousin Mary Queen of Scots, forbade Catholicism under harsh punnishment and had a network of spies to hunt down any Catholic missionaries who were ministering to a number of Britons who did not agree with this new idea of The Church of England being forced upon them. Of course she would want them banned if the Jesuits were successful the crown would be humbled to accepting the fact that the Pope and not the Regent had the final say on religion.

  • Did you read what you wrote? So many things wrong with that statement. Nazism is a form of fascism. Why would they create two forms of government which contradtict each other (communism & facism) but both manage to agree to the persecution of the church. There is no logic to it. Yes they remained active in countries after they were thrown out, if the counrty had a real reason to not want these men back in they would still be barred entry to those nations and persecuted today in those nations.

  • Mary Stuart had condemned hundreds of Protestants to death.

    Communism and Fascism can both be traced back to the Jesuit Order. To say there is "no logic to it" suggests you aren't looking at the bigger picture.

    To see that bigger picture, the first thing you ought to do is watch the Alberto Rivera part 6 "Jesuit infiltration" clip in my favourites. Alberto Rivera was an ex Jesuit who exposed all. He exposed how the Jesuit Order has infiltrated religions and governments all over the world.

  • The aim of Nazism was to destroy Protestant Germany, gas Jews en masse, send millions of German Lutherans to their deaths in Siberia, and start a war with the Protestant British Empire. They also targetted "liberal" Catholics in southern Germany. The aim of Communism was was to kill Jews and to start a war between Orthodox Russia and Germany. Before WWII had even ended the Jesuit Order were plotting to "unify Protestants" (or what was left of them) under Rome by creating the Ecumenical movement.

  • My friend you are clearly delusional. In the same breath Elizabeth I put many Catholics to death. That was just the politics of the time. Reformation and counter reformation. Your source, which I looked up, i found no not any historical projects. Just that he was the Secretary incharge of the protestant leauge of Canada. An overtly anti-Catholic group. At a university level we call that a biased source or in other words rubbish. Conspirasy theories and out dated prejudice thats all you produce.

  • I could quote from countless sources, all suppressed history. Are you aware that the Jesuits have suppressed history on a global scale? It's not a "conspiracy theory". Its a conspiracy.

    "you are clearly delusional. In the same breath Elizabeth I put many Catholics to death. That was just the politics of the time"

    Tens of millions of Protestants perished. Mary Stuart was a wicked woman. A Romanist carrying out the Spanish Inquisition.

  • First of all if you're interested in coninuting an arguement message me. My appologies to the Jesuits for cluttering up the discussion. So what about the priest hunters and penal laws in Ireland all the Catholics killed? Do you view that as acceptable? Suppressed history my arse, nothing more than thinly guised bigotry and prejudice. As for Queen Mary, she is looked upon as a figure of nationalism for the Scots the last truely monarch of Scotland. My presbyterian mother was named after her.

  • The troubles in Ireland began in 1155AD when the "church" of Rome usurped the Celtic Church and sold Ireland to the English RC King Henry II (To Rome, basically) then again during the massacre of 1641 when Jesuit priests told Catholics to liquidate all Protestants.

    Mary Stuart was a Jesuit puppet. As was 'Bonnie Prince Charlie' the other Roman coward who sent thousands of highlanders to a certain death and then managed to sneak into the history books as a Scottish hero. Message me if you wish.

  • Thats massively offensive to any truely Irish person. Even the children in Ireland know of the terrible massacre of Catholics. Whole towns massacred - women and children in Wexford, murdered as they knelt in prayer. The Irish Catholics were defending their land, their homes and their lives. For centuries it was illegal to speak Irish, it was illegal to have an Irish surname, it was illegal to practice Catholicism on pain of death or imprisonment. To be Catholic was to be a 2nd class citizen.

  • Bigoted and misguided people like you (Islandretreat) on both sides of the divide is the reason there is still so much hatred, violence and distrust in N.Ireland.

  • Best thing about it the imbecile is not even from northern ireland

  • Don't pretend you have a clue of Irish History, there was only one church in Ireland, the holy roman catholic one until you heretics came

  • The Celtic Church in Ireland was usurped in a papal bull Laudabiliter which granted dominion over Ireland to the King Henry II (to Rome bascially) for a penny a year known as Peter's penny. Ireland was conquered by the sword for papal profit after the Vatican sent the Normans to the British Isles in 1066 to destroy the Culdee Churches. Remnants of the Culdee Church in Scotland lasted down to the Reformation until King James authorised the AV1611 Bible--the inerrant, infallible Word of God.

  • Yes but very few historians actually see that as legitimate as most believed it was a farce. The pope years a few years later denied this so why would he do this then a few years later the pope deny it. Henry forced the people to pay this a year as he believed it would get the churches support for his invasion, also most of Ireland and it's churches was untouched right up unitl henry the VIII. Most of Ireland at that time was still ruled by Irish kings

  • Henry II forced the people to pay PETER'S PENNY--a papal tax. You're absoluytely wrong to say the Churches "were untouched right up until Henry VIII". The Celtic Church in Hibernia (Patrick's Congregation) was usurped in the year 1155AD. Irish historians overlook the fact that itr wasn't England who conquered Ireland in the 12th century---it was Rome. If you knew the history of the Culdee Churches you'd understand why Rome destroyed the Celtic Church in Ireland.

  • Ireland was always Catholic, St Patrick the apostle of the Irish was sent by pope celestine to convert the Irish to catholicism in which there were many before him who had already established many churches here. Irish monks had already travelled across britain and europe spreading the faith so there obviously wasn't a contradiction in their teachings with romes. The papal bull laudabiliter has never by most historians been regarded as legitimate and believed to be false.

  • You clearly have no idea of the history of the Celtic Church. During the Roman empire there were 10 great persecutions of Christians from Emperor Nero-Diocletian. He was the Roman emperor who had medals made with the inscription the Christians are no more. Christianity found refuge beyond the bounds of the Empire (Hadrian's wall) where the lamp of truth burned dimply until Patrick crossed the channel and evangelised Pagan Hibernia. Patrick preacfhed fromk the unpolluted well of Holy Scripture..

  • Patrick founded the Celtic Church in Hibernia for the sole purpose of acting independently of the Papacy. The Celtic Churches were centuries older than the 4th century Papal system. St Columba then travelled back across and founded the Church of Iona. From there, after the fall of Rome, the Culdees (Céile Dé - Servants of God) evangelised all the land from Iceland to north Italy--Scotland, Hibernia, Wales, England, France, Germany, Switzerland, Holland, and even reaching as far as Russia..

  • Patrick preached from the unpolluted well of Holy Scripture. The real historical Patrick was no Romanist. Nor were the Culdee Churches which were set up in Scotland and Hibernia. They preached the pure simple Gospel---the same theology as the 16th century Reformers--they were Protestants. We have correspeondance to prove it. When the title of "Universal bishop" was conferred on Boniface III by imperial decree in the early 7th century the Culdees sent a letter of protest which can be read online.

  • The Culdees (the Scoto-Irish Churches) Christianised western and central Europe and Roman Catholicism didn't really gain ascendancy until about the time she was disgracefully launching crusades in the name of Christianity. Ireland wasn't Roman Catholic until the 12th century. Malachy was "one of the first perverts to popery among the irish and one of the key agents in the enslavement of his native land."

  • There had been seven centuries of peace and prosperity in Hibernia from the 5th to the 12th century. Hibernia was known as the land of greats scholars, the youth of Europe travelled there to drink in the wisdom of its schools. Then Romanism reared its ugly head in the 12th century and there has followed 9 centuries of calamities. The Papal Caesar in Rome was now the dicatator of Ireland using the English Roman Catholic Kings as middle-men.

  • They wrote a strongly worded letter of protest, I should add!

  • The Culdees were in flat opposition to Rome and why do you think the Normans invaded the British Isles in 1066? One of the main reasons was to destroy the Culdee Churches. That's why William the Conquerors brother Odo, who was a Roman Catholic bishop, led a Norman army into Scotland only to be routed by William Canmore's army. Why do you think King Robert the Bruce and all of his subjects were excommunicated for resisting English tyranny? Longshanks was a mere puppet serving the Papal Caesar.

  • Thanks to the Culdee influence at that time Bruce regarded excommunication as as an empty threat.

    And of course, if you want to talk more about Irish history let's not forget that between the years 1641-49 the Jesuits slaughtered an estimated 150,000 innocent unarmed Christians in Ireland. Its pointless the Papaist denying it because we have contemporary Roman Catholic writers who state the figures, one or two of tthem even in a boastful manner.

  • dimly*

  • @Paddy234 The Jews Called Christ a heretic.

  • @korzon So?

  • @Paddy234 Because they would not accept the truth as you don't obviously.Do you people even read the Bible or do you just listen to them read it to you and tell you what it means?

  • @korzon I do and not the one with several books removed like many protestant ones, i'm not ignorant to the fact that the bible was created by the chruch and it was the popes final authority that would decide what books would go into it

  • @Paddy234 "the holy roman catholic one"? i hope you are aware of what your "holy roman catholic one" is doing to helpless orphans in that place.

  • @mpenaco what are they doing exactly? Feeding them? Taking care of them? Instilling faith and morals? A few bad apples don't ruin the bunch everytime.

  • @Paddy234 dude, jesuits arent heretics......

  • @Paddy234 Well said, as there is only one TRUE church and that's Holy Roman Catholic Church!

  • @JamesColvent What about me? I'm Ukrainian Catholic.

  • Please! You read frickin' Jack Chick comics for your information?

  • No, i haven't read Jack Chick comics. I've read the Luciferian Jesuit Oath as well as various rare and banned history books. You should too. All available online.

  • Where is this stuff you're reading?

  • Islandretreat shit for brain lmao Alberto Rivera has been exposed as i liar and fraud in many protestant publications in America not by catholics but by protestants as being a lying toe rag just like you you chick tract reading imbecile

  • Nobody cares what any Papists say about Alberto. He exposed the Jesuits and was allegedly murdered for doing so. With the invention of the internet the Jesuit Order is being exposed for what it is and no amount of lies from foul-mouthed Papists can change that.

  • Papist ??????? did you not read what i said you bitter twisted protestant imbecile he was exposed as a fruad and lier by many protestan publications in America

    You knuckle dragging D.O.B

  • I realise the Irish Papist gets offended when he hears the truth but nevertheless, he's going to hear it. Rome's Normans conquered Saxon England and from there conquered Ireland fror papal profit and used the English kings as middle-men. I don't care how many times you tell me "Protestants" have exposed Alberto. Rome's Jesuits have infiltrated the Protestant Churches and its more than likely that these "Protestants" are Jesuit wolves in sheeps clothing. Research the facts, Alberto was no fraud.

  • That's the first time i have been referred to as a dirty orange b******d by a Muslim. I think it's more likely that you're an anti-semite Irish papist serving Satan masquerading as a Muslim who doesn't have the guts to show his true identity. The Roman Catholic heart is as stinking as a sewer---you masquerade as Muslims, Jews, Protestants, in order to advance your Satanic agenda.

  • Read the profile and username imbecile its obvious to anyone with hafl a brain cell can see that im not a muzlim lol

    anti semite like martin luther you mean ?

  • It was obvious that you are a foul-mouthed Irish Romanist from the minute I met you. It's hardly surpising that an Irishman is anti-Semite given Ireland's shameful Nazi past.

    Martin Luther was not anti-Semite. The Jesuits fabricated documents and attributed them to Luther.

    The most infamous anti-Semite was hitler--who was nothing but a Jesuit mouthpiece. A fanatical Austrian Roman Catholic who set out from day one to destroy Luthers native Protestant Germany for the Jesuits of Rome.

  • lmao you are a sick twisted lunatic oh i see they fabricated documents and attributed them to luther who was nothing more than a fat drunken lustful anti semetic prostitute lover your life is one big consperisy theory

  • Yes the Jesuits fabricated anti-semite documents and attributed them to Luther in much the same way the Jesuits wrote the Protocols of Zion and attributed them to Jews. The Jesuits are the enemy of mankind---they created Fascism/Nazism, Communism/Bolshevism and they created Zionism.

  • And i suppose they created the filthy jewish tulmud?

    Dude you cant escape the luther anti semitisim even the jewish know he was a fat anti semetic pig whore turned on them when they wouldnt accept his heretical cult lol

  • There is nothing to "escape" from. The Jesuits fabricated the anti-semite documents and attributed them to Luther.

    Protestantism is revived Christianity. The teachings of Christ are the seed of Protestantism and only a degenerate mind would call Christ's teachings heresy. The Papal Caesar is a blasphemer masquerading as God manifest in the flesh and every Roman Catholic is an Idolater who disobeys God and dishonours Him. Read Exodus chapter 20 and then repent in FEAR AND TREMBLING.

  • No the Jesuits didn't create the "filthy" talmud. Why is it that everytime I expose Jesuit tyranny the Papist always tries to divert attention by changing the subject to Jews?

  • Sorry shit for brains but look over the comments it was you who brought the jews into the matter :O)

  • The reason your comment was not approved on my home page is because it is reserved for comments exposing the Jesuits and for comments praising the Lord. I really should put a notice up "No foul-mouthed, Jew hating, Bible despising Irish need apply". It is hardly surprising that Irish Papists ratified the Black Pope's European Constitution---poor popery stricken Ireland (the Republic of Ireland) is a nation of Jesuit temporal coadjutors aiding the Jesuits in their quest to enslave mankind.

  • Does that mean that the fat german anti semite luther would be blocked from your comments section if the fat pig was still alive and not burning in hell ?

  • Typical Irish papist. The facts of history mean nothing to the Irish papist. That's why your entire history is based on mythical history rather than historical fact. If you want to peddle the Jesuit lie that Luther was anti-semite then carry on. Read the Ten Commandments---Thou shalt not bear false witness. God Almighty will be the judge, jury and executioner.

  • Hehehe you typical plymouth breathern thats another thing the fat drunken german heretic should of been hung for do you know his views on the 10 comandments? yet you try and defend the fat pig with them how ironic

  • Plymouth brethern lmao

  • I simply don't care what religion you are. Popery, Mohammedanism and infidelity are the three great opponents of the Gospel. It makes no difference to me if you are a Papist or a Muslim.

  • I see you removed my comment from your page and dont say it was because of foul language as there was none used

    its the same with all those Alberto vids were the comments are always disabled so no one can refute you lunatics plymouth brethern any one lol

  • And btw shit for brains im Irish not Roman to correct you :OP

  • I'm sorry but Satan/demon/evil spirit/ghost do exist!!

  • Exactly. reality is real.

  • The 'god of this world' does not want to lose his subjects to the rule of Jesus Christ! How he must hate the Teachings of Jesus! Exorcism is very real and terrifying...

  • Excuse me, but if I am not mistaken, you are referring to Satan? I do not understand your feelings on your comment but here are a couple comments for whichever side you take:

    1. (if you are a satanist) I hope that God has mercy on your soul.

    2. (if you are a Christian) Its quite true.

    3. (if you are either) The 'God of this world' is the God of everything, and that is Jesus Christ.

  • In Matthew 4:8-11 Satan offers Jesus the kingdoms of the world...if he will bow down and worship him. Satan represents himself as being, essentially, 'the god of this world'. Perhaps this term is not widely used, so I'm sorry for the confusion. The character and teachings of Christ are quite different than many representations of God. I fear that many people's 'God' is more like Satan than Jesus. I am a Red Letter Christian...I have decided to follow Jesus.

  • Oh, i'm a Catholic, but I am glad you follow Christ! Being a Christian, I am sure you see that "God" is the Father of Christ, the two being part of the Trinity. But it was just a little confusing... sry.

    Christus Vincit!

  • see Benjamin Freedman's video

  • Dr Barney Maddox, a leading genome researcher --- The genetic difference between the human and the chimpanzee is at least 1.6%. That doesnt sound like much, but calculated out, that is a gap of at least 48,000,000 nucleotides, and a CHANGE OF ONLY 3 nucleotides is fatal to an animal, there is no possibility of macroevolution"

  • NewScientist website --- "It has long been held that we share 98.5% of our genetic material with our closest relatives. That now appears to be wrong. In fact, we share less than 95%, a threefold increase in the difference between us and chimps."

    ---

    - Nature Magazine May 27 2004, p382-388 - "Newest research says 7.7% difference..."

  • Similarities in the DNA code don't prove a common ancestor, but simply that the same designer wrote the code. This is proof for creation, not evolution! (anunnaki believers are included in the evolution category)

    DNA is so incredibly complex that the chances of just one DNA molecule arranging itself by chance has been estimated to be

    1 in 10-(to the power of 119,000)

    That is a huge number when u consider the entire visible uni-verse is only 10-(power of 28) inches in diameter! One molecule!

  • All the DNA from one person would fill 2 tablespoons. Yet if all the strands were tied end to end and stretched out, it would reach from earth to the moon and back 5 million times. Anyone who says we are related to apes and that DNA happened by chance is BRAINWASHED!

  • Not brainwashed, but under deep trance, possession trance....

  • meh... what bullshit :P

  • Another trick>>>>>>

    I gave a choice, not like you chose to write it-(one more sad trick for the list) >>>>>

    Having called yourself G-Dragon-9-666 are you showing that

    ---A) you are weak-minded, impressionable?

    OR

    ---B) an advocate of Child Sexual Ritual Abuse and Genocide of pure mankind

    ---

    And Im not personally attacking you, it's the info - Satanists, Crowley followers, go down the road of raping and sacrificing kids, drinking blood. If you aren't B, then you will have to admit A.

  • The argument was not about anything personal, untill you decided to scream GUARDS SEIZE HIM. aaaw whats the matter? You lost! Where is the scientific proof in a creator god who has nothing to do with us, whom never comes in contact with us, which we could never know about? Might as well be the ghost of mickey mouse for all we should care, therefore. Wheres the proof that Enki created man? Wheres the proof that YHWH is Marduk? YaHWeH is THE all powerful spiritual presence YHWH=IAMWHOAM=ETERNAL

  • dude...get a fucking life or something..now your using different accounts to keep this on...i did nt loose any ''battle''' just the fact thats the way your thinking is proof of your fanaticism...stop it okay...i cant make myself any clearer can i?

  • keep rattling while the admisnitraters get to ''our''case...just keep digging...oops...i meant ''conversing'' has you would put it in your little twisted perceptions of your doings...again tipycal of your kind!

  • and if i could ''guard seize him'' well im proud to say i would in a jeeffy!!! and cast you in some dirty dungon too! vatican 1 style! lol

  • no you directly implied thats what i was AND I REPEATIDLY ASKED YOU TO STOP...but thats the thing...ive meat your kind in person...and i know your ALL cHARLATANS like your ''doctor''(MEGALOL) of evengilism hoving thats what it says on his website!!! LOLOLOL(15$the diplomat) you selfrightous kind are all the same liars ,pretenders, fakes, abusers,, thieves, WOLVES IN SHEEPS CLOTHING!!! you want to pretend to be so good...you better live up to your pretentions...or else!!!

  • 'We' have not been replying to you, only sending fresh new comments, (so that you won't be hassled, because I thought you had had enough)

    Make sense?

    We weren't arguing personally in this way, but once you reached the point of no return, you had to ditch the info and start the attacks.

  • Funny how you are still coming back here, you must be voluntarily checking the link, even though you try to give the impression that you are done with it. Because neither me or cacophny (me) [haha] have been directly replying to you (which involves you getting an email letting you know you've been replied to)

  • i get emails of it

  • you'll get in trouble for having two accounts aswell....boy your diggin yourself in deep...

  • Actually I was using a friend's

  • Big deal. Some poofter with a goatee and nappy singing in the street. Im meant to be offended? Looks pretty funny actually.

    Heres your 'consolation' prize, loser.

    -watch?v=FwTVFk1HK3Y

    -watch?v=lgQHQ992Wnw

    -watch?v=1dkoSJt6xfY

  • -watch?v=2Y5ORpMTebI

    -watch?v=SE7nN80dIw8

    -watch?v=6DXT7CbaCjE

  • -watch?v=OReeS2xJ2pk

    -watch?v=GvvatiTufzc

    -watch?v=xJXUv_btg60

  • No, Im commenting in this video, each and everytime Ive spoken to you, you've willingly spoken back, ive spoken, youve spoken, ive spoken, youve spoken, THATS NOT HARASSMENT

    We encourage free speech and defend everyone's right to express unpopular points of view. But we don't permit hate speech (speech which attacks or demeans a group based on race or ethnic origin, religion, disability, gender, age, veteran status, and sexual orientation/gender identity)."

  • REPEAT

    (speech which attacks or demeans a group based on race or ethnic origin, religion,

    YoU CALLED ME CRIMINALLY INBRED AUSTRALIAN AND YOU DEFINITELY ATTACK AND DEMEAN RELIGION.

    Who can't read (or spell)?

  • We encourage free speech and defend everyone's right to express unpopular points of view.

  • quoting you: criminally inbred australian, typical hating christo fag, gangraped when you were an altar boy... (speech which attacks or demeans a group based on race or ethnic origin, RELIGION,

    If I felt like Caesar for the day, you could lose YOUR account. I have no reason to do such a thing to you, as I am not having a losing tantrum.

    Your tactic - (hell doctrine is a form of threat) doesn't work, otherwise you could say "Global warming will kill you if you dont plant trees" and lose account

  • yeah i know what i said is ofensive, i am sorry for the australians i could have offended.

  • citing me so you might know:

    im am sorry if i at some point sank to your lvl

  • HERE...WATCH THIS AS A FAREWELL PRESENT

    watch?v=Hcp9WsH5TBg

    WILL MAKE YOU FEEL A BETTER IN THE MORNING IM SURE!

  • citing you: REPEAT

    (speech which attacks or demeans a group based on race or ethnic origin, RELIGION,

    CITING YOU AGAIN: YOUR DIGGING YOURSELF IN DEEP BOY...lololololool

  • I guess english isn't your primary language. Digging yourself in, is a figure of speech. I just love the way you go ballistic when you lose the battle. Hardy ha ha.

  • but that was just the last thing he ad said

    previously: Having called yourself G-Dragon-9-666 are you showing that (your) an advocate of Child Sexual Ritual Abuse and Genocide of pure mankind

  • here are accusations he send me...did make me mad...sorry!:

    The sources of this theory are not 'faiths' you'd like to get into. Human sacrifice. The druids. The Canaanites.