Added: 4 years ago
From: doulosChristou
Views: 85,407
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (3,386)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The bible shows that we once lived with dinosaurs until the great flood, I believe that the dinosaurs are one of the reasons god made the flood, if dinosaurs still existed, humans would be second on the food chain.

  • @MsTruthtella '' bible shows that we once lived with dinosaurs until the great flood''

    Well it has been proven there was no global flood and large dinosaures died out 65 million years ago. So I guess the bible is wrong again.

  • yes, man did exist with dinosaurs. the old testament covers it, they are called Tannyn, the hebrew meaning for dragons. Dinosaurs was coined later to replace the word. In book of Job, God answers him with a discription of behemoth a (Brachiosaur) go check it.

  • @leedo12 Wrong, Dinosaurs were discovered by studying the fossils, and they stopped making those fossils at the end of the last great mass extinction 65 million years ago.

    Dragons are a myth just like the global flood myth. No evidence at all.

  • we are what ever we perceive ourselves to be, the english language is so archaic and backwards that anyway we try to explain, prove, articulate is irrelevant, for we explain things as a circle, yep we go round and round and round.

    Thought about thought lately...

  • I just can NOT believe that people still discuss this subject, even though it has been PROVEN over and over again that we`ve evolved from primates.. and some people say: "Dont freaking tell me that I come from a monkey!!! Thats ridiculous!! I came from Adam and Eve after they talked to some snake on an apple tree and got cast out of the garden of Eden by the voice from the sky!! The evidence?? Its all in the bible!!"....

    bitch please!

  • @gustavoandrian monkey please, knob...

  • @gustavoandrian It's proven that we evolve from primates?

  • @SarahJ83 Human are classified at Great Apes and all apes are primates.

    Wikipedia>

    ''The Hominidae ( anglicized hominids, also known as GREAT APES), as the term is used here, form a taxonomic family, including four extant genera: chimpanzees (Pan), gorillas (Gorilla), humans (Homo), and orangutans (Pongo).''

  • Before looking at this bullshit go to google images and search stegosaurus and see what one really looks like.

  • @gregrutz uhm, what do you expect it to be, on HD?

  • notice how one of the video tags is "bible" i figured as much,

    evolution is a proven fact, there have been no stegosaurus' for millions of years.

    just because you find something that you compare to a stegosaurus (dispite it having a massive head when steggy only had a tiny head) means nothing,

    also you fail to note the fact its in between what looks like a unicorn (below) and what looks like a lamb-crocodile above... the creator was clearly experimenting or high :P

  • @DemoraX The Evolution you're talking about is a religion, aka It shouldn't be taken as a part of science. You need faith to believe that the earth is millions of years old, like when they say that every layer of the earth is millions of years old, but there are petrified trees found standing up in those layers

  • @BUNGLE7777777 evolution has been proven time and time again, like the fruit fly experiment where scientists forced a species of fly to evolve into one which could survive extremely low levels of oxygen, theres only as much faith required as when you go to the doctors, if they tell you that you have X and to cure it you need to do Y, they know what they're talking about they've studied it, they did'nt just read it in a book written by desert dwellers thousands of years before science.

  • @BUNGLE7777777 FYI >> Evolution is a science of Biology and Paleontology. Geologists study the rocks, they are the scientist who proved the earth is old and there was no global flood.

    Layers of sediment can be deposited quickly or the trees would have rotted. No one says the layers took millions of years to surround the trees.

  • @BUNGLE7777777 I am not a creationist, but I can tell you are right on those points, I mean we dont know how old the rock layers really are. Just sayin.

  • that carving is clearly not very old. hello?

  • asian pussy is horizontal for the bible tells me so, me love you long time!!!!

  • Theres proof of this in outback Queensland Australia, the Aboriginals painted the nessy type creatures in caves.

  • Thought experiment. Who said, humans and dinosaurs lived together, and yes im not saying the designer of the carving didn't see what he carved..

  • Its just a damn carving what type of proof is that..now if it was there with u than it would be different...

  • @Inez344 lol missed the point did we..

  • its only one God stupid asses.its not two or three ONLY ONE GOD MADE THE DAMN EARTH AND US.. DAMN YALL SOO FUCKIN STUPID...read the damn Bible..all y'all who dont believe in God and jesus christ ooohwee I hate to be y'all..y'all wont be in heaven..

  • @Inez344 lmao and who created god did man create himself with no woman? we gave our rib to create woman but it is woman who creates man....i dont remember reading about dinosaurs in the bible, u think u know wat the kingdom of heaven really is? u cuss in ur words and call people names like those are the righteous sings of one on his way there...

  • @Inez344 And you're uneducated! What a surprise!

  • @Inez344 Indoctrination at its best.

  • there are literally HUNDREDS of carvings, stone art, and clay art depicting dinosaurs that older civilizations should know nothing about, unless they saw them.

    You can choose to ignore these hundreds of eye witness testimonies from different continents and believe instead in radio-isotope decay dating that ASSUMES decay rate has always been the same, despite that being proven false by natural disasters.

  • @alexchavez777 eye witness testimoney is the worst evidhence of all because of how falliable it is, and radio active dating is the best form of measurment we have and is not falliable to naural disaters because the amount of argon is not renewed by natural disater because the amount is constant on a planetary basis while carbon dating is falliable because the carbon count is renewable due to its stability as an element. fossils back then were often found and thought of as dragons.

  • @alexchavez777 You ignore the fossils record and thing some art proves something.

    Stegosaurus had small heads with no horns [like this carving] and spikes on their tails, this is not a Stegosaurus.

  • @alexchavez777 Go to Google images and look at what a stegosaurus looks like dummy.

    Geologists knew the earth was million of years old before radiometric dating was invented.

  • @alexchavez777 And some people who don't understand evolution think finding a living dinosaur would prove it wrong.

  • @alexchavez777 It's especially remarkable when one considers that the ancients were anticipating the paleo-art styles of the eras their work was found in too. 

  • Oh I bet you believe in Global warming.. and you don't look up in the sky either... You dip shit.. You think that Muslims attacked us on 9/11 you stupid fuck.. If you want to stick your head up John Holdren's ass and him lead you around.. then smell the shit. I'm NOT a STUPID ... I bet your a College educated brainwashed moron. Scientific.. Hitler had a science program? Have you ever heard of false science. The only 3 concrete and steel structure to collapse by fire.. were on the same day.

  • @iondetox I assume you also believe the US never landed on the moon, Elvis is still alive, JFK was killed by communist aliens, and that the holocaust never happened? I mean, you embrace a large number of absolute bullshit conspiracy theories, why not embrace them all?

    People like you should be put down.

  • 1. stegosaurus had a tiny skull.

    2. all stegosaurus fossils have been dated around 150 million years old.

    3. no 150 million year old human fossils have ever been discovered.

    4. although you are cataclysmically wrong, even if you were'nt and dinosaurs did walk around 900 years ago, that still would'nt add any more reason to believe in a god from any religion.

  • @ 0:20 That just shows that Ancient Aliens who knew of the Stegosaurs had people carve it.

  • what if they found fossiles?

  • There is also carvings of Vishnu. Does that mean man and Vishnu lived together?

  • There are human foot prints and diansour tracks in the same limestone in South Texas! You can see them on u-tube

  • @iondetox or you can read a scientific paper and find out that those are both dinosaurs footprints!

  • @eleminatus No their not unless you are calling a human a dinosaurs. I had a guy from the National Geographic look at it and he told me that the could get statisticians measure the toes.. and stride.. The little girl that led me to the tracks.. she put here feet in the tracks and they fit perfect.. there were children and bigger human footprints too.. But she put her feet in them and walked the stride was exact. I'm sure some cocaine head scientist wrote a story about it.. but it's a lie.

  • @iondetox oh yeah.. a little girl walking the footsteps is much more credible then scientific research! jesus christ, man....

  • fuck you atheists

    fact is fact

  • athiests are fools

  • @mdebbiec1 oh yeah, kinda like idiots who believe that a virgin could get pregnant without getting fucked or that snakes can talk....der der der!!!

  • @mdebbiec1 says someone who most likely believes in magic! Fantastic!

  • @mdebbiec1 Go get an education, it might aid you in life.

  • You basically refute your own argument with this, your suggestion is that if men and dinosaur lived side by side, one would expect to see artwork depicting dinosaurs. But you only found a few and even those are questionable. We find an overwhelming amount of depictions of lion, tigers, etc, but you only found those questionable examples of dinosaurs. Reality conflicts with your theory.

  • nice vid cool place crazy idea

  • @podoau YES

    I think you meant to show you, and I think you can find it if you search for it, and dont just ignore the ones actually admitting its true. But I'll give you a few simple ones below:

    ww w .icr. org/ article/ paluxy-river- tracks/

    w w w . ian juby .o rg/delk/

    w w w .talkorigins. or g/faqs/ p aluxy/o nheel.ht m l

    w w w .y outube. co m/w atch?v =6oGqPc6 poS4

    w w w .yout ube. co m/watch ?v= lXDBX99 qePA

    Remember to erase the spaces in the links! Peace!

  • @TurokSwe ""w w w .talkorigins. or g/faqs/ p aluxy/o nheel.ht m l

    From the conclusion of that page::

    Claims of human tracks occurring alongside dinosaur tracks have not stood up to close scientific scrutiny, and in recent years have been largely abandoned even by most creationists.

    The most celebrated "man tracks" on the Taylor Site are forms of "metatarsal" dinosaur tracks--made by dinosaurs

    SO even the sites you quote from debunk your thinking !! Did you even read the page ??

  • @podoau That has to do with what you prefer to read, while you read and believe things that you dont believe in and things you do believe in, of course you believe that part, while I believe the opposite. This reply you gave only shows more how ignorant you are and unwilling to understand me.

  • @TurokSwe ww w .icr. org/ article/ paluxy-river- tracks/

    Even though it would now be improper for creationists to continue to use the Paluxy data as evidence against evolution, in the light of these questions, there is still much that is not known about the tracks and continued research is in order. We stand committed to truth, and will gladly modify or abandon our previous interpretation of the Paluxy data as the facts dictate.

    Your good at own goals ha ha

  • @podoau Ah, no, I sorry to make you disappointed, but I dont make own goals. I think it stands 5-0 to me.

  • @TurokSwe There is something here. Look at these comments you made.

    Maybe it was made by nature, not by millions of years, but the flood layed them in these layers when the water receded.

    all prints that has been found by now and that has been investigated has been shown and proven to be authentic tracks where Humans crossing dinosaurs or reversed

    and then: • But seriously, grow up creatard!

  • @podoau I think you are the one trolling here, and Im starting to suspect you starts to take this argument to an dead end, you turn it into a pointless argument, but sorry, now I also got of the topic itself, lets stop that and continue witht he actual argument, or if you continue to talk about me and make nonsense claims about me, then I dont see much reason to continue our pointless debate. Well, at least I have not so ignorant, as you, people where I live that at least listens and argue good.

  • @TurokSwe Then, I ask you to show one website that shows how the Paluxy prints are real. So you present 5. The first two I look at explain how the prints are dinosaurs. One is even a religious site that explains how they are all dinosaurs !! Then you claim you dont make own goals

    You either dont know what side your actually on, or your troll.

    Im starting to suspect the later

  • @podoau Isnt it good with more than one? Or are you too lazy to take a deeper look into them? No site of the ones I gave you explains "how they are all dinosaurs !!" now you need to wake up! And I am certainly right that I dont make own goals, that has never happened if I have to tell the truth.

    Im not on anyones side, or well, Im on reality's side.

    You can suspect whatever you want. I thought this argument wasnt about me, I thought it was about the topic itself, dont cross the borders! Peace!

  • @TurokSwe "" are you too lazy to take a deeper look into them ""

    I read the whole article, and Ive read it before.

    "" No site of the ones I gave you explains "how they are all dinosaurs !!"""

    Yes they do. Read the talkorigin one again. The conclusione explains why they are ALL dinosaur tracks

    "" I dont make own goals""

    You did.. at least twice

    .

  • @podoau You dont only have to read the whole article, you need to understand it and think and combine it with other things and etc. Im sorry but I dont have time explaining all this for you, its also getting a little irritating. Well, I cant find that they say all tracks are dinosaurs, and I certainly have hard to believe in this conclusion, and I have never seen any human like dino tracks. No, I can assure you that I dont make own goals, if anyone of us have made an "own goal", then thats you.

  • @TurokSwe ""You dont only have to read the whole article, you need to understand it ""

    I did.. Did you ??

    "" Well, I cant find that they say all tracks are dinosaurs"" Then clearly you DIDNT read and understand it.

    "" I certainly have hard to believe in this conclusion"" Why ?? Its backed up by evidence. Its explainable. You just dont want to beleive it.

    ""I have never seen any human like dino tracks "" Now you have

    "", I can assure you that I dont make own goals"" You did. twice

  • @TurokSwe "" No site of the ones I gave you explains "how they are all dinosaurs !!" ""

    Claims of human tracks occurring alongside dinosaur tracks have not stood up to close scientific scrutiny, and in recent years have been largely abandoned even by most creationists. Although genuine dinosaur tracks are abundant in Texas, the alleged Paluxy "man tracks" involve a variety of misidentified phenomena.

    Now read tthe rest of the conclusion from talkorigins

  • @podoau Yeah, why would it stand up to scientific scrutiny? As I said, everything isnt as we want it to be, scientists also have to accept that. Thats what you believe, but not what I believe, simple. Our argument starts to get irritating, since it doesnt get anywhere, we just holds on to our own beliefs but no one convinces anyone or make any progress. I think Im going to leave the argument. Peace!

  • @TurokSwe "" Yeah, why would it stand up to scientific scrutiny? "" Because it doesnt.

    "" As I said, everything isnt as we want it to be, scientists also have to accept that. ""

    Maybe, but when things are explainable by observing the evidence, thats not a case of ïts not what we want", its a case if how it is.

    You seem determined to make things how you want them to be, regardless of all the evidence proving you wrong.

    Science isnt a beleif, its observable evidence

  • @TurokSwe Read a science book IDiot.

    Dinosaurs were the dominant terrestrial vertebrates for over 160 million years, from the late Triassic period (230 million years ago) until the end of the Cretaceous period (65 million years ago), when the Cretaceous–Tertiary extinction event caused the extinction of most dinosaur species, except for some small ones with feathers.

  • @gregrutz I suppose the reason you are repeating the same things is because you want to keep your hope in the light and believe that your belief is the true one, I can tell you you can believe whatever you want, but you dont need to argue about it, thats totally unnecessary. I dont have time to argue with you, so, peace and good bye!

  • @TurokSwe You are too stupid to prove science wrong. Quote us some more creatard crap.

  • Undeniable proof? Living proof? No way.

    It doesn't even look like a Stegosaurus.

    It's a Stego-Triceratops. There's no such thing though, so it's nothing.

    That block looks newer than the one above it. There's no patina on it.

    The creation story was handed down verbally for thousands of years.

    It's a simplified tale. The 6 days were time periods, not literal days.

    Believing the earth is 6000 years old,

    is like believing the earth is the center of the universe.

    It's already been proven false. 100%.

  • People thought Troy was a myth but there it is? the bible talk's about dinosaurs in Job 40v16-18 read for your self read about the foot prints in texas of dinosaurs and human's walking togather seek and you will find the truth i belive it is called biloxi,tex

  • @hoseybig10 "" read about the foot prints in texas of dinosaurs and human's walking togather seek and you will find the truth i belive it is called biloxi,tex ""

    Its call the Palaxy River. The so called footprints of man walking with dinosaurs has proved to actually be two different dinosaus. Even creationists admit that.

    What was that about seeking the truth ?? You have a LOOOOONG way to go

  • @podoau Not "Palaxy River", Paluxy River more exactly! Thos footprints has certainly not been "proven" to be two different dinosaurs, thats just about belief, and it is especially a belief for people who are desperate to prove it wrong and prove their own belief to be right. Its so sad that they need to do such a wierd thing. It has been proven that there are Human tracks crossing dinosaur tracks, and they are obviously still finding tracks under lots of rocks at the river. Not fake! No way!

  • @TurokSwe ""Thos footprints has certainly not been "proven" to be two different dinosaurs ""

    Yes they have. There are a small number of prints that have eroded so they look like human prints, but if you follow the prints up the river bed, they most certainly are dinosaur prints. the "man track" claims have not stood up to close scientific scrutiny, and in recent years have been abandoned even by most creationists.

  • @podoau No they certainly havent, thats just what you believe. Please, all prints that has been found by now and that has been investigated has been shown and proven to be authentic tracks where Humans crossing dinosaurs or reversed. You need to keep up in the research and what is actually true, but this is what I believe, and of course you believe otherwise, and of course its very hard to believe your belief is true today, but Im just going to stick with reality. "most"? I bet not!

  • Awesome ! so, those carvings of half lion-human and half bird-human in the Egiptian pyramids also means those creatures must have existed right ?

  • You're gonna have to give me more than a carving of something that looks vaguely like a stegosaurus before I start praying to God.

  • oh yes.. a carving of a pig with leaves behind it is somehow proof that dinosaus lived with man.

    Lets just forget any other evidence to the contary

    If god exists, why did he make people so stupid ?

  • @podoau Hey , to your last comment ( your choice)

  • @TheKotek1 Exactly!

  • Sorry, but that does not look like a Stegosaur

  • @gregrutz According to you it doesnt look like a stegosaur, but according to others and me as a prehistory, primarily dinosaurs, expert it does have characteristics of the stegosaur-family and therefore it does look a little like a stegosaur.

  • No, this is not a joke,  This is the best evidence that man lived with dinosaurs that we have !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Don't Segasaurus have a small head with no horns?!?

    And spikes on it's tail? How did they miss those huge spikes?

  • @gregrutz Haha, sorry but no, this is certainly not the best evidence that dinosaurs and man lived together, there have been tons of considerably better evidence found. Please have in mind that they maybe didnt think of the actual size of the creature's head when it was carved, and we dont know if there might have been a new kind of stegosaur or related animal that they saw that didnt have the spikes but did have horns, we certainly havent discovered everything yet.

  • @TurokSwe Dinosaurs were the dominant terrestrial vertebrates for over 160 million years, from the late Triassic period (230 million years ago) until the end of the Cretaceous period (65 million years ago), when the Cretaceous–Tertiary extinction event caused the extinction of most dinosaur species, except for some birds.

  • @gregrutz Now this is getting really irritating, why do you keep repeat yourself with the same crap?

  • That doesn't even look like a Stegasaurus ! They have small head with no horns.

  • @gregrutz We have already been through this, havent you learned anything? Dont think too much on the details, that is probably what the ancient people also didnt do, thats why it looks like it does. And it does look a little like a kind of the stegosaur-family, but not the genus Stegosaurus, it might be a new species. Have an open mind!

  • I doubt that no fossils were seen before the keeping of currently recognized records.theyve been available since before humans existed

  • This is a very interesting find, and it does resemble some kind of lizard animal, with vertical back plates *like* a Stegosaurus. However, if you look at Google images of a Stegosaurus, you will see that it has a quite different neck and head shape from the animal depicted here in masonry. The animal depicted also seems to have a shield behind its head, which a Stegosaurus does not. Nevertheless it is a fascinating discovery of an animal that would appear to be extinct now.

  • This is not dinosaur but if it was that still wouldn't be proof peoples lived together with dinosaurs. Think! It would be probably proof of that peoples saw dinosaur YES saw but not alive but his bones! Is it so hard to learn that dinosaurs got extinct millions years before humans?

    To much flinstones! If my 4 yo nephew can learn that so can you. Grab a real book and quit that arrogant approach! You think you are better than Noble price catholic winners? They know evolution and they supportIT

  • Gravity also hasn't been proven! Read up about Intelligent falling! Teach the controversy......

  • @TacoBurgher327 Why should we teach a controversy that doesnt even exist in real science ?Show me one non christian who believes this shit ! Over 99% of the experts back evolution, so what controversy are you talking about ? If we would teach every shit a few wackos believe we dont have time enough to teach the important stuff. So why should your wacko idea get special treatment ? Because you believe it ? Sorry but thats not really a reason. Its called SCIENCE education, period !

  • THERE ARE NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION. ONLY MICRO-EVOLUTION IS POSSIBLE IN NATURE, BUT NOT MACRO-EVOLUTION. WHY? TO FIND OUT WHY, PLEASE READ MY INTERNET ARTICLE ON RUSSIA'S PRAVDA NEWS: "WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!" JUST GOOGLE THE TITLE. I DISCUSS NATURAL SELECTION, GENETICS, MUTATIONS, FOSSILS, THE ISSUE OF GENETIC AND BIOLOGICAL SIMILARITIES BETWEEN SPECIES. PLEASE READ THE WHOLE ARTICLE. THANK YOU.

  • @Mogley52 If micro evolution is possible, then macro evolution is too. A lot of micro evolution= macro evolution.

  • @Mogley52 So you believe in 'little' evoltuion but not 'big' evoltuion? Silly.

  • @gregrutz That is certainly not silly my silly friend, that may be wise. Peace!

  • i hope this video is a joke

  • god created man at the beginning of time therefore if dinosaurs exsisted they did indeed live with man

  • Human's have been around for 1.8 Billion Years. According to new evidence.

  • This is ludicrous. It doesn't prove anything.

  • Attention, that does not look like a stegosaurs, end of argument.

  • Evolution was still a "theory" last time I checked. If you are blinded to the evidence of the creator all around you then one day you will get to debate it with God himself. Hey little greggrutz LOL on that one buddy. Evolution is a path of fools. This is the path of those who have foolish confidence; yet after them people approve of their boasts. Psalm 49:13.

  • If I carve a unicorn and there are no accurate history accounts, it must means unicorns existed in this time period.

    This is what some people in the future might believe. Unicorns must have at one time existed with human beings in the 21 century.

    All because I carved a unicorn and they did not look further into the credibility of my sculpture.

  • This is the best evidence against evolution ?!??? LOL

  • @gregrutz This is not the best evidence against evolution. LOL

  • @TurokSwe Because you can't prove evolution is wrong. LOL

  • @gregrutz Yes, it is possible to disprove evolution, or at least parts of it. LOL

  • @TurokSwe So do it ! Prove evolution wrong and be a hero. I will wait.

  • @gregrutz Why in hell should I disprove evolution? I wont be a hero just because I disproves evolution.

  • @gregrutz

    Evoultion is a fact.But what it has to do with dinosaurs?Its posible that disnosaurs still live in some parts of world.Our weak level of paleonthology cannot disprove that dinosaurs dont exist today.In next 500 years ppl will laugh at our silly theorys and weak technology such as we laugh at ppl that lived 500 years ago.Its ignorant to think that we know all stuff about this planet,especialy when we consider that we didnt even check 5 % of our oceans

  • @Swiati There are lots of dinosaurs, but just the little ones with feathers.

  • Stegasaurus don't have horns on it's head. It has spikes on it's tail OOPS.

  • Yes apparently multiple cultures had the same art, pottery, stories of these creatures they NEVER EVER saw...most have been great drugs they all were using and conveniently had the same trip...hmmm!!!! The mind of men that reject God are no different than Judas Iscariot...saw all these wonders and still rejected...or the Israelites in the wilderness...human nature always chooses to rule itself...no doubt we have done a great job over recoreded history.

  • @1927Norma yes god did create everything (bullshit) the only reason creationists beleive the world is 6000 years old is becasue that was the first recorded idead of him if you go back further to the etruscians, aztecs, ancient egyptians, greeks and early romans there is no word of him.

    and i'm pretty sure ancient civilisations could dig so maybe they found a stegosaurus skeleton and carved it with skin of how they thought they looked like, we do this today

  • Hello, I just wanted to say thank you for posting this video. Great quality. I love Apologetics Press. I heard Dave Miller two weekends ago at the Ooltewah Church of Christ. I really like the work these guys do. I saw your video on the first baptism of the year. You keep up the good work my brother. Jeffrey Brewer Central Church of Christ, Chattanooga TN

    ps. It's funny how evolutionist show their true colors when presented with a simple fact.

  • @heze9kiah The fact is it does not look like any know dinosaur. The temple was built 800 years ago, where are the dinosaur bones.

  • @gregrutz Yes, it do look like the known dinosaur Stegosaurus or something like it. We believe the temple was built 800 years ago, and the bones, who knows where they are? Thet may be under the ground, as many fossils are found, or they may have been taken by someone somewhere, we just simply dont know, only speculate.

  • @gregrutz Evolution was still a "theory" last time I checked. If you are blinded to the evidence of the creator all around you then one day you will get to debate it with God himself. LOL on that one buddy. Evolution is a path of fools. This is the path of those who have foolish confidence; yet after them people approve of their boasts. Psalm 49:13.

  • @heze9kiah Yes, the Theory the shows how evolution works is a Theory and will always be a Theory. It was accepted 150 years ago. Get over it.

  • Gravitational pull is a theory... Get educated. 

  • The makers of that temple could have just seen some fossils that got uncovered during rains.

  • Thanks for going through the trouble to make this video!

  • just because there are some paintings and clay sculptures of dinosaurs in some caves, that doesn't mean they coexisted together. all it means is that those cave-men (or ancient culture) KNEW that dinosaurs existed. how? probably found fossils by accident, thought they were mythological creatures and then gave them enough respect to paint them on cave's walls and make sculptures. it does not prove AT ALL that they coexisted, just that they knew dinosaurs existed. science doesn't work this way bud

  • @91lilfrozone23 Yet it would be cool to think some stegs survived for that long.

  • @Khyrid

    it would indeed, but it's completely idiotic to base your opinion on some sculptures and shit lol

    this guy is truly stupid for posting such a foolish video on youtube. he didn't even said "this could be proof" he said "this IS proof that dinosaurs and men live together". what a bloody ignorant ****....

  • @91lilfrozone23 Some people just believe whatever they want to believe, like UFO and 9/11 inside job conspiracy theorist. Unfortunately not everyone has the mental capacity to develop intellectual honesty.

  • I love this! Based on a vague similarity to a carving in a religious temple - irrefutable proof! It nice to know that this constitutes proof, as I have seen older carvings of Hanuman - the Indian monkey god creating man - haha irrefutable proof!

    So now we can put the debate to rest - botht eh Bible and the evolutionists are wrong - man was made by a monkey wearing a hat in India - after all there is a stone carving to prove it!

  • Yep, and man lived with lion headed beasts that are carved on the same wall. Stegosaurs are found in only three states of america, and no trace of them has ever or will ever be found in cambodia. Haha.

  • Another example of an prehistoric creature thought extinct millions of years ago is Coelacanthus Latimeria. Yet a living exemplar was found in 1938 on the coast of South Africa. So this video might not be so ridiculous after all.

  • I think this video is trying to prove that dinosaurs walked the earth with man at some point (they would argue about 3-6k years ago). But to that I say...ancient civilizations had amazing scientists that are 10x more intelligent than many of today's average Christians. Do you actually believe paleontology did not exist until the 20th century? It is as old as mathematics.

  • @hylogibbon For as long as man has been digging in the ground for coal, irone, copper, etc. he has been discovering fossils. The Chinese called them Dragons. The Greeks called them Titans. The Hebrews called them Giants. The were naturally wonderful things and it is no surprise that they entered folk-lore. Of course Genesis is no more than folk-lore and so the educated amongst us can appreciate the attempts of the iron age folks to explain the unknown. The idiots can take it as gospel.

  • Bigger questions...not this video how is it ALL cultures have a world wide flood story and depictions of dragons/dinosaurs in their literature, pottery art and stories...an objective person can see that but closed minded one..indoctrinated won't.

  • @1927Norma There are were many floods in prehistory. But many cultures affected by the c2900BC flood survived. No biblical cleansing.

    Is it suprising that monsters appear in myths. The imagination is amazing. One offering of something that looks like a stegosaurus to those who do not know what one looks like is not evidence.

    Mankind lived with these amazing beasts but chose to fill his art with bears and buffalo instead?

    Don't rely on a book of stone age myths and claim to be open minded.

  • @Huttate1 With all respect it doesn't make sense that all cultures have a flood story...what other alleged "myth" stories are found world wide?? If people experience it and the story would have been passed down from generation to generation than what we see and find in other cultures makes sense...it doesnt make sense that this is the ONE major story in all cultures...perhaps you are too closed to look at any other possibilties.

  • @1927Norma 500 characters does not give me room. Sea level rise of 350-400 feet in months c8000BP. Lake Agazziz draining. Neolithic sub-pluvial, Storegga slide. Just a couple to start you off. Their are flood myths in every civilisation from every continent. We can discuss them one by one but I found this site (far from perfect but may give you an idea) talkorigins[dot]org / faqs / flood-myths html.

  • @1927Norma Have a look at the Persian Gulf. Now imagine that the sea level is 350 ft lower. The entire gulf is dry. The Tigris and Euphrates run through this green and fertile land and drain into the Arabian Gulf at the Straights of Hormuz. This was c8000BP. Now imagine a 350 ft rise in sea water. The gulf floods and the people are drowned and displaced. This may be THE flood, it's story passed down and conflated with later / lesser floods.

  • @1927Norma Why are there similar myth from different places? DUH - because people have are similar experiences in different places! There are floods all over the world - no magic, just weather patterns that change based on thermodynamics. Also recall that during the Neolithic era, most people never traveled more than a few miles from home, and a moderate flood in a valley or plain could easily cover everything you could see, for sometimes days on end (Think New Orleans/Katrina without levies)

  • Typo... 800 bc

  • I wonder if the maker of this video is aware of the many other creatures depicted in ancient Khmer art? Perhaps on his journey to Angkor Wat he has taken notice of the many giant stone serpents with seven heads each? Did he notice any carvings of a creature with an eagle head, eagle wings and talons on the body of a man? That one is carved into Angkor temples too. Does that mean people actually lived with such beings? No it does NOT.

  • watch?v=Ys9uoOGi2Hg 

  • you call that pice of shit evidence? HAH! bible is most unbelivable bullshit that man wrote and those rock dont proof anything either proofs are in museums and if you dont get all earths history you can ask my good friend dinosaurgeorge hes paleontologyst and he will explain anything you want to know...

  • @gregrutz Yawn! I understand enough biology, I am actually studying it, but you have to realize that biology cant explain everything.

  • Comment removed

  • You have to be a little slow to think this will overturn science.

  • @gregrutz Why should he think this will overturn science? You sounds pathetic.

  • @TurokSwe Creatards think if we find a dinosaur living today it would prove evolution wrong. But they don't understand enough about evolution to know that isn't true.

    Sharks are older than dinosaurs and no one cares.