first of all what prove is there that can say that god does not exist? any smart atheist out there who can answer me without insults or with a serious answer. come on i want someone serious out there
first of all what prove is there that can say that god does not exist? any smart atheist out there who can answer me without insults or with a serious answer. come on i want someone serious out there
God's existence is something that should not be tried to prove or disprove. Faith is a beautiful thing. It is necessary to believe in something else than what we just see or know to be there.
It is millitant atheists who are ignorant and stupid. At the end of the day, they are fighting to tell people not to believe there is a better life after this one and instead believe there is nothing when we die.
I don't understand why people feel they have to take sides in the debate. The way I see it, God is the "who" and maybe the "why" in our existence.... Evolution can be the "how". Couldn't God have used evolution to create everything we see today?
Dead-to-the-spirit deluded "God Delusion" author & blithering fool scientist goon Richard Dawkins another "leader" given to the profane masses is another useful idiot for Jesuit machinations-C.O.
Jesuitical: pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating
The Jesuit Order completely altered the education system to suit their Evo-Hoax agenda to discredit the Bible. They cant have a Satanic society of 'Do as Thou Wilt' if people still follow the Bible
This is as dumb a question as asking from 1-7 if beauty, intelligence, meaning.....yada yada yada......exist. It's an extreme waste of this intelligent mans time and I am surprised he does so. It makes him look a fool.
Creationist are unable to prove that Yahweh is real. According to Hebrew mythology Yahweh Sabaoth was a warrior god from Edom/ Seir/ Paran. He used to fly around on the backs of cherubs and blow smoke out his nostrils. Yahweh is a myth. I just disprove god.
Topics: DEADLY ARGUMENTS NOW ADDED For The Creationism-Evolutionism Debate (See Subchapter 10.2.2.), The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
Why do atheists speak as if there is no teapot in orbit? It is because the teapot exhibits design, and this would prove the existence of God, its designer. God hates coffee, he loves tea.
An agnostic is simply one who claims that they have no knowledge. Atheism and theism concern themselves with belief, not knowledge. If you were asked "Do you believe in a god?" and you answered "I don't know" then you would be an atheist since you didn't answer in the affirmative. It makes no sense to say that you are an agnostic when asked about your religious beliefs. Agnosticism doesn't concern itself with belief, but with knowledge.
God gave the answer thousands of years ago to the big bang theory or where it all came from Time/Space/Matter. The creator new that many in creation were slow so He lovingly put the answer in the first words of the bible. Genesis 1- In the beginning(Time) God created(Creator) the heaven(Space) and earth(Matter). Jesus tells us where it is all going and how to get the best seats. Love u all
@Mr111mac111 Right...With the Big Bang, NASA's Robert Jastrow said, "Theologians are delighted with the proof that the universe had a beginning, but astronomers are curiously upset. It turns out that the scientist behaves the way the rest of us do when our beliefs are in conflict with the evidence."
All need to see "The Second Law of Thermodynamics". And, "Quantum Mechanics: Sir Fred Hoyle" = the need for intelligent design to have the amazing carbon atom do it's perfectly coordinated dance.
And here I am again. I'm virtually jesus christ, the master of my own domain, come to laugh at him one more time. Know that I was an agnostic not too long ago, but now I'm a Muslim guy who has tested as a mastermind, and in reality that ain't no freakin' lie.
What does the man need to prove the Infinite Reality exists? Does he know what synchronicity is, & epistimology too? Is it al just dumb luck, or is there a reason we know what we do? Where does reality end, and truth begin?
There's nothing confusing about agnosticism you fool. An agnostic is an honest man, who will not lie to you. There's nothing wrong with saying you don't know what's going on, when the truth is that you don't. It's those who believe there is no GOD, who aren't being honest with themself. Of course, those who think that a man can be a god, are also silly fools.
The Infinite Reality that transcends space & time, is the entity that many know as ALLAH. You are just a finite being, that will die soon.
@virtuallyjesuschrist People are being honest with themselves if they say, there is no god, because there is no good reason to believe in one, if there was reason, and evidence that a god existed, Atheists, like myself, would say that there was a god, it's not honest to be in between, mostly because agnostics purposely haven't seen the reasons not to believe in a god, probably because they still have that belief in them that tells them if they 100% don't believe, they get torture in an afterlife
@halflifefan84 In reality you're only half right if you believe such a thing. For in reality there's no reason not to believe in GOD, if you have a closed mind. I'm no fan of 1984, because the government tried to control everyone. If you want to have self control, you must let the truth set you free. Take responsibility for all you think, and everything you do, let the guy next to you do the same thing too! You can lie to yourself all you want, for the truth is I don't care. You'll be dead soon.
@virtuallyjesuschrist Hey, do you believe in the flying teapot? No? THEN YOU'RE CLOSE MINDED AND LYING TO YOURSELF. That's pretty much the exact same argument you are making. Enough said...
@halflifefan84 To tell you the truth, I don't know what the 'flying teapot' is. could enlighten me? But, if you ask me about GOD, I'll tell you this - ALLAH is the Infinite Reality that transcends both time & space, The reason for me, & you too, you silly little halfwit! We are but finite beings, born to die my friend. I'm not here to argue with you, I'm here to tell you the truth. If you can't cope with that reality, too bad for you! Enough said yet?
@virtuallyjesuschrist The flying teapot is the Infinite Reality that transcends both time & space, The reason for me, & you too, you silly little halfwit! ;)
I like how you get angry, just shows how insecure your beliefs are, and I know I'm going to die, I said I was an Atheist, sorry, but you're retarded, you're making arguments from atheism btw.
@halflifefan84 Once again my fine little fan, you've proven to me you're a halfwit still. I'm not mad at you little fiend, I'm only telling you how it is. Of course you can believe in anything you want, & atheism is the believe you've chosen. I don't care whatsoever, and in reality I'm havin' fun killin' time, talkin' to fools like you. Just so you know, I'm not retarded at all, in fact I'm a mastermind. Why don't you take the test yourself, you can find it at keirsey(dot)com.
Hey everybody! Watch my video The God Delusion Song! You'll love it. I wrote it based on the work and the words of Chirstopher Hitchens and Richard Dawkins.
I really think you laugh and be saddened...it get the message out there that's for sure! Thanks. (Just click my name and the video will open).
we can't even travel safely to mars yet and here we are, with our small than pea brains, throwing out possibility of existence of GOD the designer just because WE can't prove his existence using our PRIMITIVE 1 dimension apparatus.
How to you think you can measure GOD of the Universe (spirit being) with our inferior tools that can ONLY give "scientifically proven or not verdict" - is wrong tool.
@sungl0 No, the thing is we should start with the hypothesis that there may be a god, and then work from there. That's the way the scientific method, or the means to figure out if something is actually true or not, works. The opposite way of going about it (presuming something is true, and then cherry picking what supports it and dismiss what doesn't) is the way to prove whatever you presume first is true, not the way to determine reality.
We have no evidence, thus no reason to think it's true.
@mchadron To tell you the truth GOD is the infinite Reality that transcends both space & time, the Creator of the seen & unseen, and the ALL Knowing ONE. You & me are merely part of the creation, born to die my friend. We are beings that create nothing from nothing, but we do manipulate what we find in space & time - both the physical & conceptual. Do you understand the light that I've provided, or are you still confused? I'm just a Muslim mastermind, tellin' it like it is! Peace out dude!
@Truthiness231 ok we dismiss god and where do we start?the big bang?all we have is an expanding universe to support it,but you could say the universe contracts.if we take the big bang out of the equation we get nothing.nice little experiment.
@mchadron "all we have is an expanding universe to support it..." Not at all. Please do some research on the big bang and what we know; it's demonstrably true already. "...[Y]ou could say the universe contracts"Actually, no not that either. Current models of the universe show that it will continue to expand; the "big crunch" hypothesis isn't demonstrable true.
"If we take the big bang out of the equation we get nothing.nice little experiment." Afraid you lost me on this part. If the big bang theory weren't right, it doesn't mean "oh well we're out of ideas, time to start assume magic people did it again" ^.^
In fact I'll go one further: not only is there no proof to prove a creator of any specific type exists/existed (which is why almost everyone's beliefs (i.e. guess) vary from small amount to greatly from everyone else on the planet), there is no proof that there was/is one in general (this extends even to the pantheists, who in particular don't have a lot to have to prove).
Instead of just guessing one of the near countless religions is right, I'd decide to wait for evidence.
I think 7 is just as un-reasonable at 1. The fact is that at this moment we do not KNOW whether god exists or not. There is no reason to suspect that he does, and I believe as time goes on and our understanding of the universe grows we can edge further towards that 7 though I am not sure whether we can ever claim that we KNOW this. I would say this is a difference between atheists and religious people. Religous people claim to 'know' there is a god, when in fact they dont 'know'.
@BrightonStudent Well then we cant disprove vampires, fairies or leprechauns, but intelligent people know they dont exist. So stop pretending and face the facts. If you think 1 is the same as 7 then you must think that an IQ of 2 = an IQ of 200. And we do KNOW that god doesn't exist people just chose to keep their ears closed and not listen to the evidence, so get over it and lets start to get rid of this plague of religion.
You've clearly mis-understood both my comment and this video. I say 1 and 7 are just as unreasonable because both positions require certainty, which we dont have in this context. Dawkins is saying you dont have to be a 7 to be an atheist, being a 6, like I am, is accepting that we can never know the truth, yet give the likelyhood of there being a god the same as 'vampires' or 'faeries'. Your point about IQ made no sense,perhaps you dont understand the concept of absolute certainty
@Typho0n86 Your comment about god, devil, killing, and stupidity is a blatant example of ignorant hubris and belligerent antisocial behavior. It is people like you that close the minds of religious folks who MIGHT have listened to reason, but are now just on the defensive. You give atheism a bad name. Please, don't speak for us. We don't need your kind of help. Reply with venom, if you wish. It will do no good. Your ignorance is already out there for all to see.
@rmcdaniel423 do you know what religion is doing to this world. its about time someone did something, i dont think its good enough to sit back and watch it destroy the world. We need to do something.
@Typho0n86 wrote "i dont think its good enough to sit back and watch it (religion) destroy the world. We need to do something."
I agree. But being an arrogant condescending prick is not going to change anything. It's going to alienate the very people you wish to change. Your goal is just. Your methodology is not.
@TeenageIronman No hes right your wrong, 1 to 8 would make 4.5 50%. If you look at his scale you can see theres 3 numbers either side of 4 which makes 4 the middle of the scale. Just think of it as A B C D E F G, theres 7 letters and D is in the middle making it the 50/50 on the scale. Dumbass
there are two ways to live your life, one way is though everything is a miracle, the other as though nothing is a miracle- Albert Einstein. It doesn't matter if Albert said, I said or you said it. It doesn't make any less true. Since I over think everything I decided to over think something good for me, this quote. I go by this quote, I don't need religion, buddha, or anything like that to think like this. I'm not against religion or anything like that.
Evolution not only has all the evidence supporting it, but it is more beautiful and elegant then the hypothesis of Six-Day Creation, the fact that in a period of a few billions all this diversity can emerge from a single ancestor is amazing!
@Helge129 Not close to being a hypothesis? I will guess that my mother turns into a dragon eating squirrel tomorrow and digs a hole splitting the earth. Guess what, I JUST MADE A HYPOTHESIS!
@Helge129 Exactly. Not only is there no evidence to support even the vaguest possibility the universe was created in six days, the overwhelming weight of evidence clearly supports an age of 13.75 billion years. Creationism therefore does not qualify as a theory or even a hypothesis. Instead, it stands as yet another fairy tale intended to deceive us rather than enlighten us. It is, in other words, a lie.
@sailcat9 Evolution is simply creation happening. Nothing mystical there. Actually the 13-14 billion year estimate is limited to the speed of light. We can only see so far. Light from the early universe may never reach us as the universe expands. We also have no way of knowing what came before the expansion or how long it existed. The edge of what we know.
Your 50:50 assertion that a quantum multiverse supports the idea that if God does not exist in one universe, then based on the omnipotent and omnipresent rule, then God does not exist in any universe. And equally if he does exist in one universe, then he must exist in all universes. Both ideas have equal viability which is fine.
Conclusion: you have proven that science cannot prove nor disprove the existence of God
@Solitarious2011 not true you dont know if science will be able to in the future i mean it's already figured out so much asnwered so many questions why cant it answer this one as well?
lolling hard at all the people who failed to grasp the teapot analogy, point being: just because something's existence cannot be disproven, it doesnt follow that there is a 50:50 chance of its existence, or that its existence should be assumed. simples.
Based on the principle of a quantum multiiverse in which a universe exists for all possibilities, then we must assume that in one of those universes, God is a real possibility. Now since god is both omnipotent and omnipresent we should also assume he is present in all universes including this one :P
@Solitarious2011 a multiverse covering all probabilities would require the existence of at least one universe in which the probability of there being no god is represented, so either god is not omnipresent or the probability-multiverse theory is logically impossible. thankyou and goodnight.
why does believing in a teapot in space have anything to do with god not existing. Of course the odds of the teapot in space example are not going to make god's existence 50/50. But when it comes to "a god" existing, why not compare it to.. The possibility that a flag is on the moon.. That should increase the odds in God's favor a bit.. unless all those moon landings were faked! It would also change the odds if he's arguing against a christian god, or a higher being in general I believe.
@asdffdsa1234 The teapot in space argument isn't an argument against the existance of god, he's merley using it to illustrate his own attitude towards god(i would assume yahweh), which would be true regardless of whether any deity exists or not, and also as a counter-argument to their being a 50/50 chance of god's existance by pointing out that the inability to disprove something =/= 50/50 chance.
Agnostics/atheists would fall somewhere on the scale, from 2-7.
Consequently, those falling in the 2-7 range would be the degree they BELIEVE that the inception of the universe and life having arisen from inanimate matter was the result of non-purposed, coincidental happenstance, propagated by a perpetually indemonstrable natural mechanistic process, to have allegedly been responsible, toward actual inceptions.
I can say with100% surety that I BELIEVE the inception of the universe and life having arisen from inanimate matter, was not due to non-purposed, coincidental happenstance, caused by a never observed, hypothetical, natural mechanistic process.
Dawkins argument is illogical by it's very premise and his religiosity scale is deceitfully fallacious.
First, no one can rightly claim from an empirical standpoint that they "KNOW" there is a God or that there isn't a God.
If one insists on using a silly 1-7 degree scale, then it should be labeled from 1- BELIEVE there is a God, through 2,3,4,5,6,7, don't BELIEVE there is a God.
The valid and logical question is: On a scale from 1-7, where does one stand into degree of belief?
I have a question; Why is Richard Dawkins opinion on God or Religion more valid than say... mine? Yours? Anybody's? Ones faith or lack there of should be like ones honor, between themselves and their conscience. If you publicize it or try to convince people your view is better than anybody elses you are in fact trying to spread your faith in relation to others, just like Dawkins, which is why I call him the Devout Atheist Preacher, no better than the Brimstone and Fire idiots.
@81broncoman But Dawkins isn't threatening anyone with fiery death if they fail to accept his reasoning; nor is he indoctrinating children from a young age that his views, and his alone, are 100% correct and that the views of others are 'wrong'. He is presenting his views, giving reasoning and evidence to back them up, and letting people make up their minds. While he may have some very strong opinions, his, I think, are based on ground a bit more solid than magic books and wishful thinking.
Those who follow the "magic books and wishful thinking" have a good deal of historical evidence to support their belief that the magic is real, so you could argue that Dawkins is trying to dispute history. Dawkins should keep his lack of belief to himself, but that's impossible because he has no other method of earning money than to write books promoting his own little sect of atheism. His religion is no more or less valid than the next whether it believes in something or nothing.
@aahandm With that logic, it would be stupid of us to say that unicorns, elves, Santa Clause, and the flying spaghetti monster don't exist simply because we can't be 100% sure of it.
how do you know if something exsists ? you have to experiance it to know if it exsists. how do you know if something does not exsist? you would have to know all things to be certain of it not exsisting right? so you see it is easyer to know of a things exsistence than to know of a things non-exsistence.
I strongly disagree with Dawkins: He said he is a 6, in other words, he strongly believes there is no God. How the fk does he know? How can such an insignifcant creature such as him figure out the answer to such a question? It doesnt matter how smart he is, he is only a human, with a tiny little brain that is very limited. THINK OF THE SIZE OF THE UNIVERSE!!! Think of the size of Dawkin's brain. See ?? He is soooo tiny, soooo tiny, sooo tiny, he is incapable of reaching ultimate enlightenment...
@xBl00dBrothersX I think you missed the exact point that Dawkins is making. He is a 6, not a 7. He doesn't say that God doesn't exist, he says that there is a very low probability that (to him) a god exists, with respect to EVIDENCE. He phrases it as "I believe", not "I KNOW...". You can't be 100 percent sure, meaning you can't logically be a 1 or 7. It's a game of probability.
i'm 4: the probability that god exists/does not exist is EXACTLY the same. I've been 4 since i was 16; HOWEVER, i strongly disagree with Dawkings at the end: if you can't prove or disproof something, ten there IS an equal chance it exists/does not exist. FOR EXAMPLE: if i cant prove or disproof I can destroy the sun with my eyes, then there is an EQUAL chance that i can or can't do it. In other words, "i dont' know."
@xBl00dBrothersX I did not think anyone would react to what I wrote. The chances that there is a God, and I'm talking Creator here, are just about the same as M. Monroe being Maria Magdalen. The rest of what I wrote is like what can be, but probably is not. So it's not 50/50 creator(s) or not. There are scientific and logical reasons in favor of no creator and no indications or proof that there is one. If you take religious dogma serious than why not my claim to fame: No creator, but M.M.+ me
u believe wat u wanna believe, whether its true depends on how well u believe. the universe is big to accommodate all beliefs, surely god is bigger than any argument. if u really need to sever god completely from ur needs then surely some skewed up worldline exists where god isnt required... the fact that u currently live in this world w me where u r likely to be contradicted speaks volumes about the problems u need to resolve. for example, buddha who didnt believe in god so he became an enigma.
@randomadlib We all believe what we want to believe, and that's the absolute truth. But in reality we've been manipulated from birth by the light & sounds we find in space & time, and that my friend is no lie. If you take the time to think for yourself, and gain knowledge at the same time, you may find your peace of mind - but then again you may not. Some are predisposed to understand reality, and others are confused by the truth. I'm just a Muslim mastermind, killin' some time, & havin' fun!
Can anyone prove that Marilyn Monroe was not Maria Magdalena reincarnated? I am Jesus and I was reborn tree years before M. M. died. We missed each other but since I recognized her I will be able to save the world! Two lovers separated by time caused the big bang 13,7 bil. years ago when we met like 15 years ago. We are setting the future now. We are coming back after my death with a Star Trek spaceship to rule our planet. There is no supernatural God, only mother nature. Who believes this ? ;-)
@isleofyew1 that was the STUPIDIEST thing i have ever read. How the fk do u know for "certain" there is a god? If you knew there was no god then you must have reached ultimate enlightenment and must understand everything and the whole universe. A human brain is of microscopic size compared to the size of the universe, just the brain of an ant is of microscopic size to the size of the earth. We humans are incredibly insignificant beings, we can't figure out everything. We not in top of food chain
@xBl00dBrothersX "if i cant prove or disproof I can destroy the sun with my eyes, then there is an EQUAL chance that i can or can't do it."
No, there is not. How you came to this conclusion is beyond me. You can try to prove it. Attempt it, and you will fail. That is proof enough.
God is not so simple, as ANYONE can postulate ANYTHING's existence, and no one can prove/disprove it. Did you completely miss Dawkin's example of Russells 'teapot'? Rather, did you even watch the video?
i find it most pathetically hypocritical stubborn pride by nature when many people who dont beileve in an Eternal Almighty Supreme Intelligent Designer love celebrating Christmas and cry out loud to God when lives are a hanging by a thread and heartbeat away from death.
actually thanks to many atheists & agnostics like richard dawkins,steven hawkings,carl sagen,and george carlen i have been better affirmed of my belief in God.
You had better be trolling, or else you're a moron. Dawkins has the humility of a true scientist, to know that it cannot be disproven. He knows that no one is ever called upon to prove a negative, and therefore lives his life on the assumption that God is not there, since there is no evidence to show that he ever was there. It'd be pompous assholery to say "I KNOW THERE IS NO GOD", just as it would be to say "I KNOW THERE IS A GOD." You obviously don't know the meaning of "de facto."
@EastofForever You are not sure. You believe that it will be like that, but right now you cannot prove it. You would have to open a dictionary, and then you would have to acknowledge that you were wrong, since the picture obviously shows Kirk Cameron.
Okay, I actually think Dawkins said something halfway intelligent here. Calling himself a 6 is good; there's nothing necessarily illogical about a high level of doubt. However, I would bet that there are people out there who consider themselves a 7, which is like saying they can prove God doesn't exist, which, as Dawkins says, is impossible.
@marcusabsent37 Tens of thousands of Gods have already been laid to rest through science... If you believe in one God, then you are a 7 when it comes to all the rest...
@MrTatzer you probably can by scoping out all of space lol. This is one of my favourite videos of him speaking so far, very clear concise and straightforward
he shouldnt talk bad about the tea pot. he might end up in teapot hell. which is like swimming in hot tea for an infite time. and then you have teapot heaven. where you swim in a perfect temperature tea, with lots of sugar inn.
@gulbirk And we know this is true because it says so in a book written 2 thousand years ago. This book that was written 2 thousand years ago is automatically 100% true. Why is it true? Because. Because why? Because it's automatically true. All of it is true.
Of course there are other books that old that are not automatically true. Why are they not automatically true? Because they aren't. Why aren't they? Because. Because why? Because they're not true. Why aren't they true? Because they're not.
@gulbirk theres no sugar in teapot heaven! you are a false prophet! may you infuse with the cold overly milky misery of teapot hell for all eterneTEA.
Thanks. I can go one better. Most people know the story of Abraham almost sacrificing Isaac. What most people don't know is that Isaac means "laughter" in Hebrew. This is the original slaughter of the innocents, and why ? Because what God fears most is laughter. All dictators fear that people will stop being scared of them an openly laugh at them. Laughter is how humans can kill gods, especially easy when you consider that gods never existed in the first place.
@formless777 you're a god damned amazing philosopher. Oops i said god... time to quote south park. You're a "science damned" amazing philosopher. Oh wait...now it doesn't make sense...forget i said all that. I was trying to say I like you're comment
ok all of you people who keep saying just cause someone said that the earth is a sphere doesnt mean it is. What are you a fucking idiot we have satellite pictures of the earth showing that it is a sphere
@TharosTheDragon dumbshit the earth's flat. There are teleporters along the edges that take you to the other edge without you noticing if you try to fly/walk/swim/drive over the edge.
There is no such thing as perfection in the Universe There is not such thing as perfection. This world itself is imperfect. That's what makes it so beautiful
@TheCyotebongwater I know right. I just tried pointing out a few misconceptions and the comment was held. Fat chance it will get past the video poster's warped sense of what is just.
@TheCyotebongwater - but it's actually a good thing: their tactics cast a justified suspicion on their characters; the blocking of comments shows how afraid they are to be challenged or accept an open discussion; their need for such deception shows how they have no evidence of their own for their position and have to resort to outright lies and mudslinging.
@P0weredByPie Exactly, they hurt themselves by blocking comments. They just know that if they allow comments they will be brutally refuted, and made to look stupid.
Make a deep study on inteligent desing and then talk what u want. There is someone out there and inteligent desing can prove it as a fact. Pick a god or pick 5 gods, but you need to belive that someone made that first molecule.
@fabolocofabian Do you even know what the basis of intelligent design is? The basis of intelligent design is the following; Evolution cannot currently explain everything there is. So it must be wrong. Since evolution is wrong, we are right. Suppose someone says the earth is flat. Then someone says, well, you can't fall off the earth so you are wrong. Since you are wrong, the earth is an oddly shaped prism. There is no basis for the earth being a prism.
@fabolocofabian Yet even though there is no basis for the earth being a prism, they present NO evidence in favor of the earth being a prism. they just repeatedly state what the theory of the earth being flat lacks. No one has suggested the earth could be a sphere yet. This is EXACTLY the logic that intelligent design uses. This is not a scientific approach, this is a childish and immature attempt at a scientific method, and should be openly mocked. The same way we mock "flat earth" believers.
@fabolocofabian "but you need to belive that someone made that first molecule."
Not really, no. You just need to be well-versed in chemistry. There are multitudes of bizarre molecules that arise amidst purely natural resources. Recently we proved how RNA can come about with only natural resources...
Intelligent design is based on the argument from ignorance: I don't know X so it must be Y.
This has been flagged as spam show
first of all what prove is there that can say that god does not exist? any smart atheist out there who can answer me without insults or with a serious answer. come on i want someone serious out there
victormania2008 2 weeks ago
first of all what prove is there that can say that god does not exist? any smart atheist out there who can answer me without insults or with a serious answer. come on i want someone serious out there
victormania2008 2 weeks ago
Out of context, I could imagine his voice in a nature documentary, a la David Attenborough.
Deel2506 3 weeks ago
You can't disprove God...or zues, or satan, or apollo, or vishnu, or santa clause, or the easter bunny,or....
dkthg 4 weeks ago
God's existence is something that should not be tried to prove or disprove. Faith is a beautiful thing. It is necessary to believe in something else than what we just see or know to be there.
HippieBunny123 1 month ago
@HippieBunny123 Why do you feel it is necessary?
LTMagic21 2 weeks ago
I can prove a personal God doesn't exist if you want me to
SumAwe69 1 month ago
@SumAwe69 Go on then.
Z3MaxD 1 day ago
It is millitant atheists who are ignorant and stupid. At the end of the day, they are fighting to tell people not to believe there is a better life after this one and instead believe there is nothing when we die.
MrCODZZ 1 month ago
I don't understand why people feel they have to take sides in the debate. The way I see it, God is the "who" and maybe the "why" in our existence.... Evolution can be the "how". Couldn't God have used evolution to create everything we see today?
GoMNTwins33 2 months ago 2
@GoMNTwins33 There are plenty of people including Christians who accept Evolution, but still believe in God. But I don't believe in God(s).
MarcusEFN 2 months ago
And god can't disprove science, even though he's said to be almighty.
drydust999 2 months ago
Where can I see the whole lecture?
Auktoriserad 2 months ago
Well thanks and lol.
Twicebakedtaters 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dead-to-the-spirit deluded "God Delusion" author & blithering fool scientist goon Richard Dawkins another "leader" given to the profane masses is another useful idiot for Jesuit machinations-C.O.
Jesuitical: pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating
The Jesuit Order completely altered the education system to suit their Evo-Hoax agenda to discredit the Bible. They cant have a Satanic society of 'Do as Thou Wilt' if people still follow the Bible
SpencerBenedict2nd 3 months ago
This is one of the hardest things to explain to a theist at times
percyth11 4 months ago
now children the man in the sky doesn't exist
NightHowlingLoneWolf 4 months ago
Science can't disprove the existence of green fairies floating around inside your head either ... *eyes rolling*
oODarkEnergyOo 4 months ago
Nowhere in the video does Dawkins say science can't disprove god.
JonasSalk 4 months ago
This is as dumb a question as asking from 1-7 if beauty, intelligence, meaning.....yada yada yada......exist. It's an extreme waste of this intelligent mans time and I am surprised he does so. It makes him look a fool.
Twicebakedtaters 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Creationist are unable to prove that Yahweh is real. According to Hebrew mythology Yahweh Sabaoth was a warrior god from Edom/ Seir/ Paran. He used to fly around on the backs of cherubs and blow smoke out his nostrils. Yahweh is a myth. I just disprove god.
halolIlmao0 5 months ago
Hmm... Since when is 4 50% of 7?
sorcerio 5 months ago
@sorcerio If he started with zero, and went to seven, he could have used 3.5 as the halfway point, (50%)
but looking at his chart it looks like 4 is the halfway point, 3 numbers on the left, 3 numbers on the right
Hgt4420 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NEW BOOK FOR DEBATES AND GOVERNANCE
Topics: DEADLY ARGUMENTS NOW ADDED For The Creationism-Evolutionism Debate (See Subchapter 10.2.2.), The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
etc.
TheServiceWeb 5 months ago
Why do atheists speak as if there is no teapot in orbit? It is because the teapot exhibits design, and this would prove the existence of God, its designer. God hates coffee, he loves tea.
Megaritz 6 months ago
Im a 6.9 repeating...
MetalSiicken 6 months ago
I'm sorry but God is fake, the orbiting teapot however is real and no one can prove me wrong.
LegionIscariot 6 months ago
I don't know if I'm oversimplifying but doesn't agnostic mean "I don't know if i believe in a god" and atheist "I don't believe in a god"?
TheSherwin2261 7 months ago
@TheSherwin2261
An agnostic is simply one who claims that they have no knowledge. Atheism and theism concern themselves with belief, not knowledge. If you were asked "Do you believe in a god?" and you answered "I don't know" then you would be an atheist since you didn't answer in the affirmative. It makes no sense to say that you are an agnostic when asked about your religious beliefs. Agnosticism doesn't concern itself with belief, but with knowledge.
cartesiandualism 7 months ago
@TheSherwin2261 no
religious say "i BELIEVE god exist"
atheist say "I THINK god doesn't exist"
agnostics say "at this moment there are no EVIDENCES to support god existence"
patataton 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The ontological argument wins! If the possiblity of God exists, then God must exist.
esaunders07 7 months ago
God gave the answer thousands of years ago to the big bang theory or where it all came from Time/Space/Matter. The creator new that many in creation were slow so He lovingly put the answer in the first words of the bible. Genesis 1- In the beginning(Time) God created(Creator) the heaven(Space) and earth(Matter). Jesus tells us where it is all going and how to get the best seats. Love u all
Mr111mac111 7 months ago
@Mr111mac111 Right...With the Big Bang, NASA's Robert Jastrow said, "Theologians are delighted with the proof that the universe had a beginning, but astronomers are curiously upset. It turns out that the scientist behaves the way the rest of us do when our beliefs are in conflict with the evidence."
All need to see "The Second Law of Thermodynamics". And, "Quantum Mechanics: Sir Fred Hoyle" = the need for intelligent design to have the amazing carbon atom do it's perfectly coordinated dance.
GoodyBob 7 months ago
And here I am again. I'm virtually jesus christ, the master of my own domain, come to laugh at him one more time. Know that I was an agnostic not too long ago, but now I'm a Muslim guy who has tested as a mastermind, and in reality that ain't no freakin' lie.
What does the man need to prove the Infinite Reality exists? Does he know what synchronicity is, & epistimology too? Is it al just dumb luck, or is there a reason we know what we do? Where does reality end, and truth begin?
Jesus2point3 8 months ago
There's nothing confusing about agnosticism you fool. An agnostic is an honest man, who will not lie to you. There's nothing wrong with saying you don't know what's going on, when the truth is that you don't. It's those who believe there is no GOD, who aren't being honest with themself. Of course, those who think that a man can be a god, are also silly fools.
The Infinite Reality that transcends space & time, is the entity that many know as ALLAH. You are just a finite being, that will die soon.
virtuallyjesuschrist 8 months ago
@virtuallyjesuschrist People are being honest with themselves if they say, there is no god, because there is no good reason to believe in one, if there was reason, and evidence that a god existed, Atheists, like myself, would say that there was a god, it's not honest to be in between, mostly because agnostics purposely haven't seen the reasons not to believe in a god, probably because they still have that belief in them that tells them if they 100% don't believe, they get torture in an afterlife
halflifefan84 8 months ago
@halflifefan84 In reality you're only half right if you believe such a thing. For in reality there's no reason not to believe in GOD, if you have a closed mind. I'm no fan of 1984, because the government tried to control everyone. If you want to have self control, you must let the truth set you free. Take responsibility for all you think, and everything you do, let the guy next to you do the same thing too! You can lie to yourself all you want, for the truth is I don't care. You'll be dead soon.
virtuallyjesuschrist 8 months ago
@virtuallyjesuschrist Hey, do you believe in the flying teapot? No? THEN YOU'RE CLOSE MINDED AND LYING TO YOURSELF. That's pretty much the exact same argument you are making. Enough said...
halflifefan84 8 months ago
@halflifefan84 To tell you the truth, I don't know what the 'flying teapot' is. could enlighten me? But, if you ask me about GOD, I'll tell you this - ALLAH is the Infinite Reality that transcends both time & space, The reason for me, & you too, you silly little halfwit! We are but finite beings, born to die my friend. I'm not here to argue with you, I'm here to tell you the truth. If you can't cope with that reality, too bad for you! Enough said yet?
virtuallyjesuschrist 8 months ago
@virtuallyjesuschrist The flying teapot is the Infinite Reality that transcends both time & space, The reason for me, & you too, you silly little halfwit! ;)
I like how you get angry, just shows how insecure your beliefs are, and I know I'm going to die, I said I was an Atheist, sorry, but you're retarded, you're making arguments from atheism btw.
halflifefan84 8 months ago
@halflifefan84 Once again my fine little fan, you've proven to me you're a halfwit still. I'm not mad at you little fiend, I'm only telling you how it is. Of course you can believe in anything you want, & atheism is the believe you've chosen. I don't care whatsoever, and in reality I'm havin' fun killin' time, talkin' to fools like you. Just so you know, I'm not retarded at all, in fact I'm a mastermind. Why don't you take the test yourself, you can find it at keirsey(dot)com.
virtuallyjesuschrist 8 months ago
if there's a china teapot in space then its provable, china put it there dummys
Kdajrocks 8 months ago
That's a "straight 7" for me! : )
winterstellar 8 months ago
yes its true but they cant disprove it either or Dawkins would be out of a job! i love these vids.... teapot eh!!
joinery11 8 months ago
yes its true but they cant disprove it either or Dawkins would be out of a job!
joinery11 8 months ago
why would he even try to use reasoning with god?what a jerk!Go back to your labratory and come up with something better than this crap bitch.
mchadron 8 months ago
i wonder if he as ever actually read the bible to know what he is on about?
becoram 8 months ago
6.99 here
AmericanCritiquer 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hey everybody! Watch my video The God Delusion Song! You'll love it. I wrote it based on the work and the words of Chirstopher Hitchens and Richard Dawkins.
I really think you laugh and be saddened...it get the message out there that's for sure! Thanks. (Just click my name and the video will open).
AtheistSongs 9 months ago
we can't even travel safely to mars yet and here we are, with our small than pea brains, throwing out possibility of existence of GOD the designer just because WE can't prove his existence using our PRIMITIVE 1 dimension apparatus.
How to you think you can measure GOD of the Universe (spirit being) with our inferior tools that can ONLY give "scientifically proven or not verdict" - is wrong tool.
sungl0 9 months ago
@sungl0 If you want to be referred to as a peabrain go ahead, don't drag the rest of us into your stupidity
moomoo1337 9 months ago
@sungl0 No, the thing is we should start with the hypothesis that there may be a god, and then work from there. That's the way the scientific method, or the means to figure out if something is actually true or not, works. The opposite way of going about it (presuming something is true, and then cherry picking what supports it and dismiss what doesn't) is the way to prove whatever you presume first is true, not the way to determine reality.
We have no evidence, thus no reason to think it's true.
Truthiness231 8 months ago
@Truthiness231 i like where your going with this.whats after god,and what is god in the first place?
mchadron 8 months ago
@mchadron To tell you the truth GOD is the infinite Reality that transcends both space & time, the Creator of the seen & unseen, and the ALL Knowing ONE. You & me are merely part of the creation, born to die my friend. We are beings that create nothing from nothing, but we do manipulate what we find in space & time - both the physical & conceptual. Do you understand the light that I've provided, or are you still confused? I'm just a Muslim mastermind, tellin' it like it is! Peace out dude!
virtuallyjesuschrist 7 months ago
@Truthiness231 ok we dismiss god and where do we start?the big bang?all we have is an expanding universe to support it,but you could say the universe contracts.if we take the big bang out of the equation we get nothing.nice little experiment.
mchadron 8 months ago
@mchadron "all we have is an expanding universe to support it..." Not at all. Please do some research on the big bang and what we know; it's demonstrably true already. "...[Y]ou could say the universe contracts"Actually, no not that either. Current models of the universe show that it will continue to expand; the "big crunch" hypothesis isn't demonstrable true.
Truthiness231 8 months ago
@Truthiness231 lol its been years since i've done research on the big bang.sounds like some interesting stuff.
mchadron 8 months ago
@mchadron CONTINUED:
"If we take the big bang out of the equation we get nothing.nice little experiment." Afraid you lost me on this part. If the big bang theory weren't right, it doesn't mean "oh well we're out of ideas, time to start assume magic people did it again" ^.^
Truthiness231 8 months ago
@Truthiness231 well i could'nt come up with any ideas if you take the big bang out.i never implied magic people,just left it open for imagination.
mchadron 8 months ago
@sungl0 CONTINUED:
In fact I'll go one further: not only is there no proof to prove a creator of any specific type exists/existed (which is why almost everyone's beliefs (i.e. guess) vary from small amount to greatly from everyone else on the planet), there is no proof that there was/is one in general (this extends even to the pantheists, who in particular don't have a lot to have to prove).
Instead of just guessing one of the near countless religions is right, I'd decide to wait for evidence.
Truthiness231 8 months ago
Ateapotists? XD
JaguarEscarlata 9 months ago
If there was a god then there would be a devil, and he would help me kill all the religion in this world. So therefore there must not be a god!!!
The scale is like 1 = stupid and 7 = resonable.
Typho0n86 9 months ago
@Typho0n86
I think 7 is just as un-reasonable at 1. The fact is that at this moment we do not KNOW whether god exists or not. There is no reason to suspect that he does, and I believe as time goes on and our understanding of the universe grows we can edge further towards that 7 though I am not sure whether we can ever claim that we KNOW this. I would say this is a difference between atheists and religious people. Religous people claim to 'know' there is a god, when in fact they dont 'know'.
BrightonStudent 9 months ago
@BrightonStudent Well then we cant disprove vampires, fairies or leprechauns, but intelligent people know they dont exist. So stop pretending and face the facts. If you think 1 is the same as 7 then you must think that an IQ of 2 = an IQ of 200. And we do KNOW that god doesn't exist people just chose to keep their ears closed and not listen to the evidence, so get over it and lets start to get rid of this plague of religion.
Typho0n86 9 months ago
@Typho0n86
You've clearly mis-understood both my comment and this video. I say 1 and 7 are just as unreasonable because both positions require certainty, which we dont have in this context. Dawkins is saying you dont have to be a 7 to be an atheist, being a 6, like I am, is accepting that we can never know the truth, yet give the likelyhood of there being a god the same as 'vampires' or 'faeries'. Your point about IQ made no sense,perhaps you dont understand the concept of absolute certainty
BrightonStudent 9 months ago
@BrightonStudent I am absolutely certian that there is no god.
Typho0n86 9 months ago
@Typho0n86 Your comment about god, devil, killing, and stupidity is a blatant example of ignorant hubris and belligerent antisocial behavior. It is people like you that close the minds of religious folks who MIGHT have listened to reason, but are now just on the defensive. You give atheism a bad name. Please, don't speak for us. We don't need your kind of help. Reply with venom, if you wish. It will do no good. Your ignorance is already out there for all to see.
rmcdaniel423 9 months ago
@rmcdaniel423 do you know what religion is doing to this world. its about time someone did something, i dont think its good enough to sit back and watch it destroy the world. We need to do something.
Typho0n86 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Typho0n86 wrote "i dont think its good enough to sit back and watch it (religion) destroy the world. We need to do something."
I agree. But being an arrogant condescending prick is not going to change anything. It's going to alienate the very people you wish to change. Your goal is just. Your methodology is not.
rmcdaniel423 9 months ago
Comment removed
TeenageIronman 10 months ago
@TeenageIronman man, you really have to be stupid in order to still argue against Staenwald comment and not realizing your dumb mistake
jsr1919 10 months ago
Comment removed
TeenageIronman 10 months ago
@TeenageIronman No hes right your wrong, 1 to 8 would make 4.5 50%. If you look at his scale you can see theres 3 numbers either side of 4 which makes 4 the middle of the scale. Just think of it as A B C D E F G, theres 7 letters and D is in the middle making it the 50/50 on the scale. Dumbass
shmonksta 10 months ago
Comment removed
TeenageIronman 10 months ago
there are two ways to live your life, one way is though everything is a miracle, the other as though nothing is a miracle- Albert Einstein. It doesn't matter if Albert said, I said or you said it. It doesn't make any less true. Since I over think everything I decided to over think something good for me, this quote. I go by this quote, I don't need religion, buddha, or anything like that to think like this. I'm not against religion or anything like that.
acdc14terrace 10 months ago
Evolution not only has all the evidence supporting it, but it is more beautiful and elegant then the hypothesis of Six-Day Creation, the fact that in a period of a few billions all this diversity can emerge from a single ancestor is amazing!
OliverKako 10 months ago 25
@OliverKako You are giving Creation too much credit. It's not even close to being a hypothesis.
Helge129 6 months ago
@Helge129 Not close to being a hypothesis? I will guess that my mother turns into a dragon eating squirrel tomorrow and digs a hole splitting the earth. Guess what, I JUST MADE A HYPOTHESIS!
ixcaliber 6 months ago
@ixcaliber Is it coherent, supported by observations? No, so it's not a hypothesis. Not in the scientific meaning anyway.
Helge129 6 months ago
@Helge129 Exactly. Not only is there no evidence to support even the vaguest possibility the universe was created in six days, the overwhelming weight of evidence clearly supports an age of 13.75 billion years. Creationism therefore does not qualify as a theory or even a hypothesis. Instead, it stands as yet another fairy tale intended to deceive us rather than enlighten us. It is, in other words, a lie.
sailcat9 6 months ago
@sailcat9 I would go further, it's not only a lie - it's a scam on a global scale.
Helge129 6 months ago 3
@sailcat9 Evolution is simply creation happening. Nothing mystical there. Actually the 13-14 billion year estimate is limited to the speed of light. We can only see so far. Light from the early universe may never reach us as the universe expands. We also have no way of knowing what came before the expansion or how long it existed. The edge of what we know.
Twicebakedtaters 4 months ago
@Twicebakedtaters Your comment is intelligent and your username makes me hungry.
ndrthrdr1 3 months ago
Your 50:50 assertion that a quantum multiverse supports the idea that if God does not exist in one universe, then based on the omnipotent and omnipresent rule, then God does not exist in any universe. And equally if he does exist in one universe, then he must exist in all universes. Both ideas have equal viability which is fine.
Conclusion: you have proven that science cannot prove nor disprove the existence of God
Solitarious2011 11 months ago
@Solitarious2011 not true you dont know if science will be able to in the future i mean it's already figured out so much asnwered so many questions why cant it answer this one as well?
312haku 11 months ago
Comment removed
Solitarious2011 11 months ago
Comment removed
Solitarious2011 11 months ago
lolling hard at all the people who failed to grasp the teapot analogy, point being: just because something's existence cannot be disproven, it doesnt follow that there is a 50:50 chance of its existence, or that its existence should be assumed. simples.
SmashedUpFetus 11 months ago
Based on the principle of a quantum multiiverse in which a universe exists for all possibilities, then we must assume that in one of those universes, God is a real possibility. Now since god is both omnipotent and omnipresent we should also assume he is present in all universes including this one :P
Solitarious2011 11 months ago
@Solitarious2011 a multiverse covering all probabilities would require the existence of at least one universe in which the probability of there being no god is represented, so either god is not omnipresent or the probability-multiverse theory is logically impossible. thankyou and goodnight.
SmashedUpFetus 11 months ago
@Solitarious2011
but then you'd first have to prove the multiverse theory
Zuurkool1 10 months ago
You can't disprove something that hasn't been proven yet. ~__~
kazath 11 months ago
@kazath if its been proven then it wouldnt be possible to disprove it...if you can disprove it then it was never really proven in the first place...
SmashedUpFetus 11 months ago
you can prove no tea pot , it's called radar dickhead. Nasa has catalogued thousands of item as small as a tea pot..
Atheists -
cedric1671 11 months ago
@cedric1671 lmao @ at your failure to see the point of the analogy. oh dear
SmashedUpFetus 11 months ago
why does believing in a teapot in space have anything to do with god not existing. Of course the odds of the teapot in space example are not going to make god's existence 50/50. But when it comes to "a god" existing, why not compare it to.. The possibility that a flag is on the moon.. That should increase the odds in God's favor a bit.. unless all those moon landings were faked! It would also change the odds if he's arguing against a christian god, or a higher being in general I believe.
asdffdsa1234 1 year ago
Comment removed
HHHonoth 11 months ago
@asdffdsa1234 The teapot in space argument isn't an argument against the existance of god, he's merley using it to illustrate his own attitude towards god(i would assume yahweh), which would be true regardless of whether any deity exists or not, and also as a counter-argument to their being a 50/50 chance of god's existance by pointing out that the inability to disprove something =/= 50/50 chance.
HHHonoth 11 months ago
@asdffdsa1234
because we have proof for the flag on the moon and not for god, nor for the teapot.
Zuurkool1 10 months ago
Turn 'transcribe audio' on and atheist becomes "a fiesta" lol
GrandSupremeDaddyo 1 year ago
Cont...
Agnostics/atheists would fall somewhere on the scale, from 2-7.
Consequently, those falling in the 2-7 range would be the degree they BELIEVE that the inception of the universe and life having arisen from inanimate matter was the result of non-purposed, coincidental happenstance, propagated by a perpetually indemonstrable natural mechanistic process, to have allegedly been responsible, toward actual inceptions.
FossilEYES1 1 year ago
Cont...
I can say with100% surety that I BELIEVE the inception of the universe and life having arisen from inanimate matter, was not due to non-purposed, coincidental happenstance, caused by a never observed, hypothetical, natural mechanistic process.
Cont...
FossilEYES1 1 year ago
Dawkins argument is illogical by it's very premise and his religiosity scale is deceitfully fallacious.
First, no one can rightly claim from an empirical standpoint that they "KNOW" there is a God or that there isn't a God.
If one insists on using a silly 1-7 degree scale, then it should be labeled from 1- BELIEVE there is a God, through 2,3,4,5,6,7, don't BELIEVE there is a God.
The valid and logical question is: On a scale from 1-7, where does one stand into degree of belief?
Cont...
FossilEYES1 1 year ago
I have a question; Why is Richard Dawkins opinion on God or Religion more valid than say... mine? Yours? Anybody's? Ones faith or lack there of should be like ones honor, between themselves and their conscience. If you publicize it or try to convince people your view is better than anybody elses you are in fact trying to spread your faith in relation to others, just like Dawkins, which is why I call him the Devout Atheist Preacher, no better than the Brimstone and Fire idiots.
81broncoman 1 year ago
@81broncoman But Dawkins isn't threatening anyone with fiery death if they fail to accept his reasoning; nor is he indoctrinating children from a young age that his views, and his alone, are 100% correct and that the views of others are 'wrong'. He is presenting his views, giving reasoning and evidence to back them up, and letting people make up their minds. While he may have some very strong opinions, his, I think, are based on ground a bit more solid than magic books and wishful thinking.
shantih433 1 year ago
@shantih433
Those who follow the "magic books and wishful thinking" have a good deal of historical evidence to support their belief that the magic is real, so you could argue that Dawkins is trying to dispute history. Dawkins should keep his lack of belief to himself, but that's impossible because he has no other method of earning money than to write books promoting his own little sect of atheism. His religion is no more or less valid than the next whether it believes in something or nothing.
81broncoman 1 year ago
@aahandm With that logic, it would be stupid of us to say that unicorns, elves, Santa Clause, and the flying spaghetti monster don't exist simply because we can't be 100% sure of it.
Mofleaker 1 year ago
@Mofleaker Why do you say Rhinos don't exist?
PrinceFelipe 1 year ago
both russell and dawkins will pay for their impertinence to the teapot.
bethnor 1 year ago 29
how do you know if something exsists ? you have to experiance it to know if it exsists. how do you know if something does not exsist? you would have to know all things to be certain of it not exsisting right? so you see it is easyer to know of a things exsistence than to know of a things non-exsistence.
aahandm 1 year ago
6.66
fermos11111 1 year ago
I strongly disagree with Dawkins: He said he is a 6, in other words, he strongly believes there is no God. How the fk does he know? How can such an insignifcant creature such as him figure out the answer to such a question? It doesnt matter how smart he is, he is only a human, with a tiny little brain that is very limited. THINK OF THE SIZE OF THE UNIVERSE!!! Think of the size of Dawkin's brain. See ?? He is soooo tiny, soooo tiny, sooo tiny, he is incapable of reaching ultimate enlightenment...
xBl00dBrothersX 1 year ago
@xBl00dBrothersX I think you missed the exact point that Dawkins is making. He is a 6, not a 7. He doesn't say that God doesn't exist, he says that there is a very low probability that (to him) a god exists, with respect to EVIDENCE. He phrases it as "I believe", not "I KNOW...". You can't be 100 percent sure, meaning you can't logically be a 1 or 7. It's a game of probability.
Please listen again from 1:08 to 1:30
09divide 1 year ago
@xBl00dBrothersX Try learning as much physics and chemistry as you can. You are much more likely to lose your uncertainty. ;)
CrazySatanicInfidel 1 year ago
i'm 4: the probability that god exists/does not exist is EXACTLY the same. I've been 4 since i was 16; HOWEVER, i strongly disagree with Dawkings at the end: if you can't prove or disproof something, ten there IS an equal chance it exists/does not exist. FOR EXAMPLE: if i cant prove or disproof I can destroy the sun with my eyes, then there is an EQUAL chance that i can or can't do it. In other words, "i dont' know."
xBl00dBrothersX 1 year ago
i'm 4: the probability that god exists/does not exist is EXACTLY the same. I've been 4 since i was 16.
xBl00dBrothersX 1 year ago
@xBl00dBrothersX I did not think anyone would react to what I wrote. The chances that there is a God, and I'm talking Creator here, are just about the same as M. Monroe being Maria Magdalen. The rest of what I wrote is like what can be, but probably is not. So it's not 50/50 creator(s) or not. There are scientific and logical reasons in favor of no creator and no indications or proof that there is one. If you take religious dogma serious than why not my claim to fame: No creator, but M.M.+ me
isleofyew1 1 year ago
u believe wat u wanna believe, whether its true depends on how well u believe. the universe is big to accommodate all beliefs, surely god is bigger than any argument. if u really need to sever god completely from ur needs then surely some skewed up worldline exists where god isnt required... the fact that u currently live in this world w me where u r likely to be contradicted speaks volumes about the problems u need to resolve. for example, buddha who didnt believe in god so he became an enigma.
randomadlib 1 year ago
@randomadlib We all believe what we want to believe, and that's the absolute truth. But in reality we've been manipulated from birth by the light & sounds we find in space & time, and that my friend is no lie. If you take the time to think for yourself, and gain knowledge at the same time, you may find your peace of mind - but then again you may not. Some are predisposed to understand reality, and others are confused by the truth. I'm just a Muslim mastermind, killin' some time, & havin' fun!
virtuallyjesuschrist 7 months ago
nah. 6,5 :S
eagleeye2102 1 year ago
@eagleeye2102
lol I did mean 1,5
xD
eagleeye2102 1 year ago
Can anyone prove that Marilyn Monroe was not Maria Magdalena reincarnated? I am Jesus and I was reborn tree years before M. M. died. We missed each other but since I recognized her I will be able to save the world! Two lovers separated by time caused the big bang 13,7 bil. years ago when we met like 15 years ago. We are setting the future now. We are coming back after my death with a Star Trek spaceship to rule our planet. There is no supernatural God, only mother nature. Who believes this ? ;-)
isleofyew1 1 year ago
@isleofyew1 that was the STUPIDIEST thing i have ever read. How the fk do u know for "certain" there is a god? If you knew there was no god then you must have reached ultimate enlightenment and must understand everything and the whole universe. A human brain is of microscopic size compared to the size of the universe, just the brain of an ant is of microscopic size to the size of the earth. We humans are incredibly insignificant beings, we can't figure out everything. We not in top of food chain
xBl00dBrothersX 1 year ago
@xBl00dBrothersX "if i cant prove or disproof I can destroy the sun with my eyes, then there is an EQUAL chance that i can or can't do it."
No, there is not. How you came to this conclusion is beyond me. You can try to prove it. Attempt it, and you will fail. That is proof enough.
God is not so simple, as ANYONE can postulate ANYTHING's existence, and no one can prove/disprove it. Did you completely miss Dawkin's example of Russells 'teapot'? Rather, did you even watch the video?
09divide 1 year ago
I'm a 777.
dirtydonki 1 year ago
It doesnt take science to disprove god, simple common sense will do that for you.
tantrikwizard 1 year ago
I am at 7.
blondecat666 1 year ago
@blondecat666 I'm a 7 also.
mjh012363 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i find it most pathetically hypocritical stubborn pride by nature when many people who dont beileve in an Eternal Almighty Supreme Intelligent Designer love celebrating Christmas and cry out loud to God when lives are a hanging by a thread and heartbeat away from death.
BBQFanNo1 1 year ago
actually thanks to many atheists & agnostics like richard dawkins,steven hawkings,carl sagen,and george carlen i have been better affirmed of my belief in God.
BBQFanNo1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
atheism is an attempt to escape the reality of being accountable after people die to their creator with eternal consequences.
BBQFanNo1 1 year ago
I use teabags instead.
I don't even have a teapot, come to think of it.
I lost it somewhere near Venus.
tonycatman 1 year ago
@emperokang
You had better be trolling, or else you're a moron. Dawkins has the humility of a true scientist, to know that it cannot be disproven. He knows that no one is ever called upon to prove a negative, and therefore lives his life on the assumption that God is not there, since there is no evidence to show that he ever was there. It'd be pompous assholery to say "I KNOW THERE IS NO GOD", just as it would be to say "I KNOW THERE IS A GOD." You obviously don't know the meaning of "de facto."
KillerHill06 1 year ago
HA! I KNEW Richard Dawkins was Agnostic!
emperorkang 1 year ago
I'm sure if I look in the dictionary for the word "twit" his photo will be there beside it.
EastofForever 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@EastofForever You are not sure. You believe that it will be like that, but right now you cannot prove it. You would have to open a dictionary, and then you would have to acknowledge that you were wrong, since the picture obviously shows Kirk Cameron.
EPR89 1 year ago
Okay, I actually think Dawkins said something halfway intelligent here. Calling himself a 6 is good; there's nothing necessarily illogical about a high level of doubt. However, I would bet that there are people out there who consider themselves a 7, which is like saying they can prove God doesn't exist, which, as Dawkins says, is impossible.
marcusabsent37 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@marcusabsent37 Tens of thousands of Gods have already been laid to rest through science... If you believe in one God, then you are a 7 when it comes to all the rest...
railroadtrash09 1 year ago
@marcusabsent37 very intelligent man.
TheDcac 1 year ago
I'm a 7 on the teapot theory, but a 6 on the god theory
electorg 1 year ago
@electorg You cant unless you can prove that there is no teapot which you cant.
MrTatzer 1 year ago
@MrTatzer you probably can by scoping out all of space lol. This is one of my favourite videos of him speaking so far, very clear concise and straightforward
davorunner 1 year ago
he shouldnt talk bad about the tea pot. he might end up in teapot hell. which is like swimming in hot tea for an infite time. and then you have teapot heaven. where you swim in a perfect temperature tea, with lots of sugar inn.
gulbirk 1 year ago 10
@gulbirk And we know this is true because it says so in a book written 2 thousand years ago. This book that was written 2 thousand years ago is automatically 100% true. Why is it true? Because. Because why? Because it's automatically true. All of it is true.
Of course there are other books that old that are not automatically true. Why are they not automatically true? Because they aren't. Why aren't they? Because. Because why? Because they're not true. Why aren't they true? Because they're not.
ninjajesus81 1 year ago 12
@ninjajesus81 lol.
gulbirk 1 year ago
@gulbirk theres no sugar in teapot heaven! you are a false prophet! may you infuse with the cold overly milky misery of teapot hell for all eterneTEA.
EbsNhexz 8 months ago
By this scale, I'm probably a 6 1/2, maybe 6.75
UnderlordZ 1 year ago
Power corrupts. Ultimate power corrupts ultimately. God is perfect, and so he created atheism to destroy him when he became perfectly corrupt.
formless777 1 year ago 3
@formless777 lol that was good
Lucifer986 1 year ago
@formless777 Even with god being fake, your idea makes more sense than most religion.
jacewolf301 1 year ago
@jacewolf301
Thanks. I can go one better. Most people know the story of Abraham almost sacrificing Isaac. What most people don't know is that Isaac means "laughter" in Hebrew. This is the original slaughter of the innocents, and why ? Because what God fears most is laughter. All dictators fear that people will stop being scared of them an openly laugh at them. Laughter is how humans can kill gods, especially easy when you consider that gods never existed in the first place.
formless777 1 year ago
@formless777 you're a god damned amazing philosopher. Oops i said god... time to quote south park. You're a "science damned" amazing philosopher. Oh wait...now it doesn't make sense...forget i said all that. I was trying to say I like you're comment
vivtin 1 year ago
ok all of you people who keep saying just cause someone said that the earth is a sphere doesnt mean it is. What are you a fucking idiot we have satellite pictures of the earth showing that it is a sphere
KCfitz 1 year ago
@KCfitz The Earth is an oblate spheroid.
TharosTheDragon 1 year ago 2
@TharosTheDragon dumbshit the earth's flat. There are teleporters along the edges that take you to the other edge without you noticing if you try to fly/walk/swim/drive over the edge.
vivtin 1 year ago 2
@vivtin Is there a giant turtle involved?
TharosTheDragon 1 year ago
@vivtin looool you mean like in the old commodore 64 games like lazy jones when you go out one side of the screen and come in the other? :P
davorunner 1 year ago
@davorunner exactly
vivtin 1 year ago
@vivtin Nice! I like the way you think! :P
davorunner 1 year ago
@CheeseMusket I believe in you! :D
realkontschi 1 year ago
There is no such thing as perfection in the Universe There is not such thing as perfection. This world itself is imperfect. That's what makes it so beautiful
aawsb 1 year ago 37
I hate how creationists are making these fake hoax videos of Dawkins and then blocking all the comments.
TheCyotebongwater 1 year ago 45
@TheCyotebongwater I know right. I just tried pointing out a few misconceptions and the comment was held. Fat chance it will get past the video poster's warped sense of what is just.
Proves they're afraid of the comments though.
LieutenantSmith 1 year ago
@TheCyotebongwater - but it's actually a good thing: their tactics cast a justified suspicion on their characters; the blocking of comments shows how afraid they are to be challenged or accept an open discussion; their need for such deception shows how they have no evidence of their own for their position and have to resort to outright lies and mudslinging.
P0weredByPie 1 year ago
@P0weredByPie Exactly, they hurt themselves by blocking comments. They just know that if they allow comments they will be brutally refuted, and made to look stupid.
s5b678 1 year ago
@TheCyotebongwater Bro. I didn't make one.
BeakyRed 11 months ago
@TheCyotebongwater hey message me ya? I'm starting a video series and the hoax vids would be great to put in.
w4rr3np34c3 10 months ago
Make a deep study on inteligent desing and then talk what u want. There is someone out there and inteligent desing can prove it as a fact. Pick a god or pick 5 gods, but you need to belive that someone made that first molecule.
fabolocofabian 1 year ago
@fabolocofabian You need to learn how to spell. Your designer would be very disappointed in you.
miniontemple 1 year ago
@fabolocofabian Do you even know what the basis of intelligent design is? The basis of intelligent design is the following; Evolution cannot currently explain everything there is. So it must be wrong. Since evolution is wrong, we are right. Suppose someone says the earth is flat. Then someone says, well, you can't fall off the earth so you are wrong. Since you are wrong, the earth is an oddly shaped prism. There is no basis for the earth being a prism.
KazuoACT 1 year ago
@fabolocofabian Yet even though there is no basis for the earth being a prism, they present NO evidence in favor of the earth being a prism. they just repeatedly state what the theory of the earth being flat lacks. No one has suggested the earth could be a sphere yet. This is EXACTLY the logic that intelligent design uses. This is not a scientific approach, this is a childish and immature attempt at a scientific method, and should be openly mocked. The same way we mock "flat earth" believers.
KazuoACT 1 year ago
@fabolocofabian "but you need to belive that someone made that first molecule."
Not really, no. You just need to be well-versed in chemistry. There are multitudes of bizarre molecules that arise amidst purely natural resources. Recently we proved how RNA can come about with only natural resources...
Intelligent design is based on the argument from ignorance: I don't know X so it must be Y.
ChaseKittens 1 year ago 2