Added: 1 year ago
From: rtheck
Views: 39,462
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (125)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • super charger got him early, I want to see an even match, both turbos, or both supers. both are awesome cars but still I feel something wasnt right here. nothin against ford but im gonna stick by chevy through thick and thin.

  • FORD POWA!!!!! Yeah buddy! "He knew this fright train was comin!!!" Haaaa

  • tanner murdered him .....

  • Ford is always better end of story...

  • He didn't have him til about half track. Unless the editing sucks, because it shows Tanner far ahead by half.

  • as long as theres a camaro the Mustang will ALWAYS BEAT IT!!!!!

  • They're not supercars though. They're muscle cars. They're not about the best cornering, braking and aero's. They're big comfy things with loads of power. I would rather have a muscle car anyday.

  • mustang the best

  • these two car are embarrasment. I cant believe you will claim this crap a super car hahahhalmao

  • supercars? really? so a ford gt and a zr1 are what?

  • 1:53 Buell!!

  • i want that mustang..

  • god damn it i hate speed limiters -.-

  • Cant wait for them to do GT500 vs ZL1

  • Sorry but Ford DOMINATES muscle car territory and performance.

  • put the camaro zl1 against the gt500 and see what happens

  • @WillDaBeast696969 Ford's been waiting 10 years for that to happen and it still ain't happened.

  • @WillDaBeast696969

    Not much. The Camaro STILL weighs more than 300lbs than the GT500, and the blower setup only adds more weight. The Mustang still has better gearing a better transmission... Loss? ZL1.

  • @EvilxMerlin ive driven a gt500 before. if it had wider tires in the rear for more traction it would rape nething off the line. except for a vette zr1 ;)

  • @EvilxMerlin Don't forget the new 2013 GT500 is coming also!

  • Put superchargers in both vehicles then do it again that would be interesting to see.

  • @calbert1999

    You sound just like those idiot ricers that say the same thing about putting turbos on Honduhs and Scions.

  • @EvilxMerlin Make your point or shut-up. If you knew anything about boost you'd know turbos vs SC deliver boost in different ways. The Camaro is at a disadvantage because it has a turbo vs SC it would be a better match with both cars boosted using SC's or Turbos. I own a Camaro SS that was making over 800hp. at the crank with only 7.5psi. of boost, we're now increasing displacement to 427 which will easily make over 1000hp. In other words I'd smoke any Mustang with my ProCharger setup.

  • @calbert1999

    Um, that was the manfuacturer's choice to go Turbo versus SC. The turbo has turbo lag, the supercharger can suffer fro heat sink. You pick one way you end up with it. End of story. I have a 2004 Terminator which puts down (to the ground) 745 HP, which is more than 800 HP at the crank. My displacement is still a measly 281ish cubic inches, and without boring out anything, I can easly make over 1000hp. Best thing? I did it all with bolt on parts and didn't touch internals.

  • @EvilxMerlin the good thing about your motor is you dont have to increase your size to get alot of power like that like the chevy guys do.they always need a 427 to try and compete.

  • @calbert1999 prove your fact. i never seen a 800 hp camaro.

  • The engine of the Shelby gt500 is one of the best engines ever created for boost purposes. That 5.4 4v v8 has proven handle more than 1200 horsepower.

  • the mustang drifts, win by default

  • Not this race but your Fords In my rear-view IM seeing checkered flags check... checkered flags

  • Yeaa, with car like these it all about the straight line performance.

  • ever think it was better tuning dumbass supercharger beats turbo not ford beats chevy u fucking retards

  • @rickyd454 Both had 1000 HP does it matter how they get too 1000hp?

  • @83estrada some one obviously didnt pay attention and has no idea what there talking about do research before u reply to this comment ;)

  • You pissed cause ford beats chevy

  • Not sure why anyone is bashing either car, it just shows you're ignorant.

    Both of these cars are awesome, I'd love to own either one. Great video =)

  • hahahaha!! just watch the mustang drawwwwwwwwww away!! xD...chevy= epic fail

  • This isn't even ford vs chevy anymore. These are both so beyond stock it doesn't matter.

  • @Hiei102493

    The Shelby had about 4 hours of mods to change the blower to a KB. That Camaro had a ton of mods including a built bottom end and it still ran like shit. My GT500 with the Stg 3 KB I jest put on it at 20 psi will bust the ass out of anything GM puts out including that plastic piece of shit ZR-1. I caint wait to suck the paint of a ZL-1. After i bust one hsi owner will swap the pulley and then fry his hyperpathetic cast pistons.

  • @kb2010gt500 FORD TOOL GO HOME. I think I her your mom calling you from upstairs. Lets say you have a gt500 (matchbox cars dont count) The Zr1 will run circles around that POS on a track . It goes fast in a staight line who cars. FYI Plastic and CARBON FIBER are different you know that right? OK go back to your PLAYSTATION GAMES. You sound like another guy that was on here talking about his gt500 never saw a pic or video but lots of talk thats all.

  • @gmrtg1414 pos? HA ford is more reliable then Chevy every day, and forever. Get a Ford Gt1000 vs a corvette. The GT will blow by it at 100+mph. I pulled out a 2010 silverado 4x4 from a ditch in the middle of a snowstorm with my 02 ranger fx4 with a 200lb plow on the front and towed it up to its lodge while we found out the driveshaft had fallen off the silverado. thats why they got stuck in a ditch, drove up the hill, driveshaft  deattached and slid into a ditch.

  • @MicroOrginisum The Zr1 will run 200mph so the ford gt 1000 goes 300mph? sure put the pipe down

  • @gmrtg1414 more like 250+ but you get the gist.

  • @gmrtg1414 idk about it going 300mph but in the standing mile it did go to 253 mph so who knows how fast it can go in say a 5 mile straight if we can find one lol

  • correction it went 266 in the mile

  • @gmrtg1414 Playstation>Xbox

  • Awww. I haven't done anything yet? I'm a UTI grad, I own 3 Cars,and have my own house an a job not to bad if you ask me =). I only humiliate ppl who are pathetic in there fanboy hopes, and get there facts blatenly wrong. And if this is sooo pathetic of an "argument" why can't you shut up and stop replying when you're wrong? btw I feel fine =). but it sounds like you're butt hurt AGIN though! And as for having no clue of your life.True but I call em as I see em and you're a backwoods GM fayboy

  • lol the camaro never stood a chance and he even jumped the start a little, but wat i really want to kno is how much it costs to get cars tuned by these companys

  • where are the supercars? hahaha

  • Damn these two mechines are great. My respects for both the camaro and the mustang American muscle all the way they are both supercars everyone needs to stop talking shit n realized we making some real sick ass mechines in America and we won't stop.

  • shitty chevy is junk.

  • hahaha. nice excuses for the Chevy side there at the end...

  • SUCK MY FORD DICK!

  • I like how everyone wants to gt500 to compete with other hennessey cars. well quite honestly I think the hennesey FORD GT is there fastest car they have. So thats still a FORD so chevy people quite crying they will come up with something else that will be faster and then ford will do something else. It will never end so everyone should be thankfull for ford and chevy without the two neither one would be shit. DONT EVEN MENTION ANY MOPAR SHIT EITHER. LOL

  • @mustangbrandon21687 lol try a corvette zr1 upgraded by hennessey for that lil ford gt;)

  • @713ford713 Ford didnt do anything with the car it was a tuning company that did, what this should have been was either a hennessey camaro or a stock SS vs a stock GT that would have shown which car was truly better

  • @MrDougwallace that is the dumbest argument EVER PROPOSED. the super snake took on a hennessey camaro and the camaro ONLY won because of traction issues with the stang. this vid right here disposes of ANY theory of which is better now because mototrend tested both of these and speed done the same thing with the traction issue fixed on the stang. so now we all have a real world answer.

  • @Speedmccool385bitch i just watched the motor trend video and none of the cars had any tire spin??? what traction issues they got off to an equal start and i agree a 100% with mustangbrandon without the rivalry we wouldnt have either of the cars

  • @MrDougwallace ummmmm..... the wheel spin @ launch hence the reason the 1/4 mile times were SOOOOOOOO close. also you did hear the guy say the stang had traction issues right? C'mon now Mr.D you didn't hear any tire slippage from the mustang?

  • @Speedmccool385bitch this is the motor trend video i saw a three way drag no tire spin thats out of the ordinary chirp /watch?v=RoKRbBfXo1M the drivers may not of had any balls but no major wheel spin all got an equal start

  • I just found out this morning while at Fastlane. Fastlane and Autograph are the same company! Well Fastlane owned Autograph that has now changed its name to something else but still owned by Fastlane. Both cars were not running a 1000 HP. Just the Shelby! the Camaro was running around 670! The Shelby was is still running on 93 Octane and made 1080 RWHP. On C16 it made over 1300 RWHP. The Camaro was running in the show with on 3 days of being built. Props to both cars. Houston Rules!

  • @77erman Proof of said statement PLEASE.....670 hp twin turbo Camaro ??? What purpose would this show have for inflating the #'s of the Camaro ??

  • @77erman

    Bwahahahahahaha, ol' Lordy. Um, no. The point you need race gas is around 16 psi or about 600 at the tire. You smokin something if you can make over a 1000 at the tire or even crank on pump gas. I'm at 20 psi and 700 at the tire and I run a minimum of 110 octane.

  • I am a ford guy but why do so many people talk smack about the camaro? if there was no camaro the mustang would have never gotten to where it is today, we should enjoy glad were able to enjoy these cars at this time, who knows how long they'll be around.

  • Comment removed

  • Would be interesting to see both vehicles on SC's instead of SC vs Turbo.

  • @calbert1999 I agree! They both push boost but still not the same. Not to mention you also have to factor in driver difference as well. You got an F1 driver vs rally racer. Two different styles obviously.

  • Regardless if you're team Ford or team Chevy, I'll beat you're just happy we have this battle again! Nothing like American Muscle .... thanks Ford and GM for keeping the rivalry alive!

  • Paul tracy missed second gear in the standing mile.they didnt comment on that.

  • ford sucks this is ridicloius. the camaro didnt even have a supercharger

  • @kirbsters542580 The Comaro Has A Turbo Its Way Better !! But The Ford Know What To do With The Things Its Has In The Car. Ford Will Be one Step Ahead Of Chevy.

  • @713ford713 Ford finally got their head out of their ass is what you probably mean. You look from the mid 80s to 2002s the Camaro dominated over the Mustang at the track. The Camaro went away for a few years, came back, and was still kicking ass. Up until this year the new Camaro V6 was only like 3 hp less than Fords V8 Mustang. Not to mention the Camaro is only the silver holder in Chevy's lineup. If you want to really compare top of food chain bring out a ZR1 vette and see whats up!!!

  • @DrkbwtiPrfm25 "3 hp less then Ford V8" you would show just how back woods you are..learn how to count the 2010 Mustang GT's V8 offers 315 hp vs 2010 Camaro V6 producing 304 hp.... hmmm here is some math for you.... 304 +11=315 304+3=307 do you see where you fail??? typicl Chevy Fan Boy Back woods and retarded... Little Boys wear bowties..... big Boys drive Ford....

  • @eddieweinburg well excuse me for not going and looking up the "exact" numbers at the time.... I remember the article saying the V6 was close to the GT mustang. So i'm back woods and a retard because my guess at it was off by 7 hp. Get bent eddie .... little boys might wear bowties but little girls ride ponys!!!!

  • @DrkbwtiPrfm25 Yep the girls do love to ride in my stang and on my cock!!! High school girls and Ford FTW!!! you are still a Fanboy and backwoods

  • @eddieweinburg You would go after high school GIRLS. Then again a mustang is a safe and slow ride for little girls. Real women are too smart and know your games. So you resort to trying to screw kids ..... Must give them a real thrill since they don't know what a real ride is. about like your cock as you put so elegantly. Grow up man. But then again your a flat lander so it will never happen.

  • @DrkbwtiPrfm25 Haha dude, you if you can't tell there is more then one person, talking to you on this profile you're not so bright! me and my buddys have been making you pussy hurt for days. But the facts are you didn't have you'r facts right and you seem really easy to make upset soo you must be fat & ugly, and as for us we are 17-20 years old guys, so high school girls is where it's at. you wish chould have some young tight V, hell you just wish you chould get so V at all must suck to be you

  • @DrkbwtiPrfm25 And as for mustangs being slow, uh yeah thats why they are the fastest muscle car stock. see your facts are wrong agin! so slow no, safe yes! and see you have not had P in so Long if ever your talking about srewing kids and little girls and showing them a real ride wow you need help, there you go being all back woods agin!! I'm a "flat lander" lol guess "High lander" is code name for slow back woods child molesters...dude you Fail!!

  • @eddieweinburg Just be glad you live in gods waiting room.... Guess when you live off your parents money its easy to talk smack. What year is your mustang? 2000 range right? compare it to a stock 2000 f-body and oh that is right you would loose! Your good at talking sh*& I'll give you that. goodbye you pathetic waste of air.

  • @eddieweinburg I just realized how pathetic this argument really is. Your a kid. Which in the same sense I don't even believe that you have actually done anything with your life yet. All you had to say was my information was wrong but you drug it out into this long as bashing of myself and my life which you have zero clue into. I've looked at your other posts and its all you do. Is try to humiliate people to make yourself feel better. Get over yourself and grow up!

  • @DrkbwtiPrfm25: Although I love the ZR-1 as well. Dont forget about the 05 Ford GTX1. Which was the 700hp convertible model of the Ford GT.

  • @V8Supercar1 I can't say that I've heard of the car before. But I have been out of the loop for a long time. Sounds like a beast tho!

  • the hennessey CRAPMARO will get killed by this GT500!!!

  • damn.. ford/shelby came on top in this competition and the shelby had more wheelspin and the camaro always had a jump off the line over the gt 500 lol FORD > CHEVY it looks like now

  • @296jayce ikr...The Henessey Camaro 800 would have dusted that Shitstang...

  • @2008C6Vette Sure...maybe if you had been behind it talking??? I hear denial passes for orgasm in Chevy circles.

  • @oldmusher hahahahaha good one man

  • what a slowmaro

  • the hennessey CRAPMARO would have gotten killed by this GT500.

  • if this was the hennessey camaro the gt500 would be crying.

  • 1000hp trap only 190mph: fail!!! 

  • Why arent they racing a car track and test these babies out? this is boring when i watch these muscle cars go side to side in a straight line.

    I like the look and power, but it aint got the handling. (i bet)

  • look at the ford with the ac on beting the chevy

  • tanner went 300 KMPH in that mustang...HOLY FUCK

  • You cant say shit about either car! Fucking Awesome...

  • The Shelby is a screamer! I would think the SS is putting down way weaker torque numbers. Chevy hasn't been a big torque player. The Mustangs have always had good torque numbers. 5.4 with blower and cams and the 6.2 with turbo and cams what a competition. I am Major Ford guy but I liked the SS also.

  • was there any doubt that would be the outcome .... new camaro sucks so bad ... Cobra FTW since 03

  • ugh fucking mustang fanboys look if u love the mustang so damn much take a look when mustangs were great. fox body smokin vettes...but the new mustangs are a sign that ford lost its swag for the most part. i loved mustangs up untill 2005. ford killed its flagship thru self destruction. shelby couldnt make it tight. not even saleen could make it right and theyre top class. ford came to inivate which dey did but its time 2 step it up. epic fail by ford. o and also dey new taurus sho is sweet

  • WOW, 190mph for the shelby!

  • This really only proves that Super Charger > Turbo Charger on top end.

  • @creech7789

    In this test only. Willing to bet the the Turbo would have a higher top end if the race would have continued pass the mile run. Usually SC's create lag on the top end where Turbos on the low end. That Mustang does have a hell of a tune on it no doubt about that.

  • @oac579 you sound like a dumb ass super chargers dont have lag they may have belt slip from time to time depending on if they have the right size belt, idler, belt tensioner turbos usually have more torque but you still have to have hp to go along with it....superchargers are better cuz you never lose boost like with a turbo when you shift gears you loose boost and have to build it back up yeah it might now take very long but with a SC as soon as you hit the gas your in boost

  • @2008cobra1 Do to the fact that the supercharger is pulley driven, there is some strain put on the engine, thus robbing the motor of potential HP, which I described or has lag. Turbo's are more efficient, boost is controlled with a various combination of (turbo size, inter-coolers, waist gates). The main advantage of a Super Charger is lack of complexity and ever ready boost.

    My point being again, The Mustang was well tuned but turbo Camaro should be able to produce better top end numbers.

  • @oac579 yes you have to give power to make power with a sc but it does not lag aother than belt slip which should never happen as long as you have the right set up. and from all the guys around my area a sc is more reliable turbos just have to much going on and can have way to many problems and you would be crazy to think a turbo can make more power than a sc you can get the same power out of each but in this video you said the camaro should have had him on top end but i dont think

  • @oac579 so shelbys have an amazing top end from the factory even thought they are 4000lbs 

  • @2008cobra1 Maybe I should have said "drag" instead of "lag" to make my point. And reliability is in the SC favor. All those Turbo problems=more adjust ability also. I was just surprised to see the Ford ahead at the end of that mile run, and felt that if you remove the finish line the TT Camaro would win out. Has evident this Mustang was a nice package. How do you define "amazing" top end at a limited 155mph?

  • @oac579 yes they are limited at 155 from the factory but they clime from 100 to 155 very fast and a simple programmer will take the limit way. i can hit 160 in 5th and still have plenty left the fastest ive hit is 173 and it gets there pretty quick but mine is not stock but i dont have 1000hp either.. and you say the camaro would have passed if they kept going but they were already at 190 how much faster do they really need to go???

  • @oac579 the shelby even had a slow start and sucked him up and had 3 cars on him at the finish so unless the camaro jumps up 20mph faster than the shelby jumps up 10 then i dont see the camaro winning this

  • @2008cobra1 The cars where only separated by a half a mph. The Ford did work well and had a gearing advantage for sure (3rd gear was a monster). The race was much closer than you think if you look at the speed and times. IMO I think a Lingenfelter prepared car would have destroyed that Cobra. ;)

  • @oac579 yes but little little small difference in times was equal to 3 car lengths thats pretty bad and thats only cuz the shelby didnt have a very good start and was behind about 3 cars if he would have go off the line faster then he would have won by probably or more cars you got to relize the shelby was playing catch up at first and he sucked him up and won by 3 cars

  • @2008cobra1 But that is racing. Launch is an important part of racing but where that Cobra had the advantage was gearing. If we assume that the stock gear ratios are in place then the Cobra does a better job of staying in its power band then the SS but the SS has a lower final drive which in theory would give it a higher top end. Again the Cobra builders did a better job than those who built the SS in getting power to the wheels in a usable rev range.

  • "ahh, he just...pulled around me like i was standing still" GEEZUSS! and prolly at about 160mph!! These cars are my wet dream!!

  • Lame.

    Anytime you're testing tuner cars, you're testing out the tuner companies, NOT the cars. The results of the tests don't reflect those of the actual GT500 and SS.

  • @evilmonkeyruler theres nothing done except power adders (mustang has different brakes). so yes it is a competition between the actual cars also.

  • CHEVY=FAIL! hahahahah. It took twins to even get behind them at 3 car links. And the shelby has a smaller engine and spun its ass off hahaha.

  • @Chad302beast engine size dosnt matter, we proved that against the corvette 7.0 liter vs the viper 8.4 liter, superchargers always have top end, o and thses cars wernt tuned by chevy or ford, so u cant say chevy or ford sucks or rules, so dont make yourself sound like a dumass

  • FORD for the win,chevy sucks.

  • @drfaticus this is fastlane vs shelby not chevy vs ford, there only chevy and ford bodies

  • @drfaticus so, the ford is a wee little bit faster, but doesn't handle as well and even with a better brake system, it still doesn't stop any faster.

  • @drfaticus and, oh yeah, the camaro looks soooo much better :-P

  • @daBlade80 the camaro looks like shit,on the inside and the outside.

  • @drfaticus suuuuuuuuure man, I mean, it's not like in any comparison between these two people always comment about the Camaro's style or anything........

  • Really you think so? I wish they were high quality. I have them recorded on my dvr in HD. I have them as high quality as i can. Used HQ which is the highest quality my dvd recorder can record, unfortunately no hd hook ups on dvd recorder, then edited and converted the video to AVI

  • I love this show. Thanks for post the high quality copies.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more