The American commentators can't keep their mouths shut. Either they obvious things without explaining shot selection or they just chatter on. When you watch snooker, their commentators punctuate the shots with their commnents. By the way, I'm a Yank.
@WW2Fanatic1000 why? so USA get a chance to break serve or what?? can you give one good reason for that argument? Pool has to be precise and so has to be the rack oÔ :D man.... come on... let´s write letters instead of emails and watch this shit on videotape instead of watching it on the net... haha, some guys are just hilarious :D
@MyStuff2504 The rack stays on the table and when balls travel over it you can see it move signifying that it's disturbing the balls. And when there is a ball sitting on it after the break they have to touch the ball and reset it to get rid of that stupid thing. In addition, the refs take forever racking the balls and the players consistently ask them to fix it. It's not precise. If anything it's the total opposite of precision. You are just hilarious.
@WW2Fanatic1000 haha :D did you have ever used that rack?? break 100 times and there are only about 5% wenn a Ball sticked to that rack... by the way: now theres an upgrade available which is designed different so that the balls could NOT stay on the rack... merry x-mas... perhaps now you a present for next year :D
@MyStuff2504 "Did you have ever used..." Some nice grammar. It's on the table, so no matter what you do to it it will still effect the movement of the balls. Even if the affect on the balls is minute (as you claim) it still affects them and should never be used in competition. And you mention that the newer versions are designed where the balls won't stay on the rack? So now it's deliberately designed to affect where the balls sit? No thanks. I won't ever use it. Give me a traditional rack.
@WW2Fanatic1000 sorry, my english isn´t good enough... i know it´s really important in that discussion... break a little harder that decreases the chance that a ball stays on the rack... but i agree... that thing determines which player will win the game... oh and don´t forget... all other players are luckier on the table then you are :D :D too funny some inch-pickers... -__-
@WW2Fanatic1000 sorry, my english isn´t good enough... i know it´s really important in that discussion... break a little harder that decreases the chance that a ball stays on the rack... but i agree... that thing determines which player will win the game... oh and don´t forget... all other players are luckier on the table then you are :D :D too funny some inch-pickers... -__-
The American commentators can't keep their mouths shut. Either they obvious things without explaining shot selection or they just chatter on. When you watch snooker, their commentators punctuate the shots with their commnents. By the way, I'm a Yank.
kennfong 1 month ago
That magic rack is the dumbest thing I've ever seen. They should request a traditional rack and do away with this garbage.
WW2Fanatic1000 2 months ago
@WW2Fanatic1000 why? so USA get a chance to break serve or what?? can you give one good reason for that argument? Pool has to be precise and so has to be the rack oÔ :D man.... come on... let´s write letters instead of emails and watch this shit on videotape instead of watching it on the net... haha, some guys are just hilarious :D
MyStuff2504 2 months ago
@MyStuff2504 The rack stays on the table and when balls travel over it you can see it move signifying that it's disturbing the balls. And when there is a ball sitting on it after the break they have to touch the ball and reset it to get rid of that stupid thing. In addition, the refs take forever racking the balls and the players consistently ask them to fix it. It's not precise. If anything it's the total opposite of precision. You are just hilarious.
WW2Fanatic1000 2 months ago
@WW2Fanatic1000 haha :D did you have ever used that rack?? break 100 times and there are only about 5% wenn a Ball sticked to that rack... by the way: now theres an upgrade available which is designed different so that the balls could NOT stay on the rack... merry x-mas... perhaps now you a present for next year :D
MyStuff2504 2 months ago
Comment removed
WW2Fanatic1000 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MyStuff2504 "Did you have ever used..." Some nice grammar. It's on the table, so no matter what you do to it it will still effect the movement of the balls. Even if the affect on the balls is minute (as you claim) it still affects them and should never be used in competition. And you mention that the newer versions are designed where the balls won't stay on the rack? So now it's deliberately designed to affect where the balls sit? No thanks. I won't ever use it. Give me a traditional rack.
WW2Fanatic1000 2 months ago
@WW2Fanatic1000 sorry, my english isn´t good enough... i know it´s really important in that discussion... break a little harder that decreases the chance that a ball stays on the rack... but i agree... that thing determines which player will win the game... oh and don´t forget... all other players are luckier on the table then you are :D :D too funny some inch-pickers... -__-
MyStuff2504 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@WW2Fanatic1000 sorry, my english isn´t good enough... i know it´s really important in that discussion... break a little harder that decreases the chance that a ball stays on the rack... but i agree... that thing determines which player will win the game... oh and don´t forget... all other players are luckier on the table then you are :D :D too funny some inch-pickers... -__-
MyStuff2504 2 months ago
It just isnt as nice when Jim Wych isnt commentating
Larrygallis 2 months ago
why scotch doubles?
julian1471 2 months ago
@julian1471
cause it'sMosconi Cup
jermikimov 2 months ago
EUUUUROPE!!!!
mackadousha 2 months ago