Okay, I find myself unable to not comment on this. Yeah, Bush sucks. He is pure evil. When he's not getting his dick sucked at the Bohemian Grove, he is busy dumping depleted uranium into the water supplies in Iraq so that children are born with terrible ailments and deformities. But Bush isn't the only one that is evil here. Bush killed the Constitution, Obama will bury it. Obama just very well could be the antichrist. Keep that in mind when you sheeple are voting him in.
the problem with impeaching is that chenney and his lawer have set is up so that as long as we are in a state of war executive powers are unlimited and signing statements allow them to bipass the congress. we cant impeach, we have grounds but the system of checks and balances is no longer there to impeach them with
That's just about the most ridiculous reply possible. Health care and the supposed welfare state have nothing to do with the Constitution. As long as you raise the issue, universal health care would seriously reduce health care costs. We spend far more per capita then any other country while millions have no access and our health care outcomes are rated last in the industrial world. It took Bill Clinton (a Dem, not so liberal) to cut welfare 50%. The real welfare problem is corporate welfare.
I think they should have tried, but the reality is that Bush would never get convicted in the Senate. The spineless Republicans, who essentially have half the seats, would never buck the party line. There are many people who support impeachment that do not believe that the futility of the outcome justifies what would be an all-consuming diversion.
Okay, I'll bite. Who did Hillary have killed, and for what truth?
But as long as we're on the subject of people dying unnecessarily, let's not forget the hundreds of thousands that have died because of Bush's lies. Do I hear anyone saying "war crimes"?
I think the power of the presentation gets lost with the inference that the Democrats have no blood on their hands. Too bad it had to be partisan. Both parties are two sides of the same corrupt/disgusting coin.
To some extent you are right. However, the party has two parts, the constituents and the leadership. The vast majority of Democratic constituents are disgusted with the lack of backbone of the leadership. Whereas, the Republican constituents clearly favor candidates that would give us four more destructive years.
I tend to think there is no clear difference between the Democrats and Republicans. We have had the same people in office for the last 23 years Bush and Clinton's. It's all about the neo con agenda and playing spades to get the next one elected. I have chosen to support Ron Paul as my candidate of choice. The man has 30 years of consistent voting and won't take special interest money.
"It takes a Democrat to love the Constitution." is alienating. Granted, the current admin has sullied their party, but you're no better when you lump a vast swath of citizens with Neocons and their unAmerican ways. Looking at Bush's approval rating, one can assume that many are unhappy with this admin. I'm an Independent that never voted Rep. But I'm sick of "us vs. them" politics. People feel powerless. We've created a nation of apathy and let these trespasses occur.
I am sick of the "us vs. them" mentality. My republican friends were lied to as well and my democratic friends. All Americans were lied to. I don't want my republican friends to be made to feel solely responsible for Bush's policies as we are all responsible. My biggest concern is that election fraud is a very real issue that has not been fully addressed.
The Democratic leadership and a majority of the Democrats in Congress are complicit in their failure to exercise their Constitutional role as a counterweight to run-away executive power . . . spineless in their consistent funding of the illegal war in Iraq . . . gutless in their collaboration on the Patriot Act and other measures that erode our rights . . . cowardly in running from their obligation to impeach. They are the unindicted coconspirators with Bush, Cheney & Co.
Glad this is here, but stick to the Constitutionally impeachable offenses, of which there appear to be several. Violating treaties, for example, is not a violation of the Constitution despite the harm those actions may cause internationally.
So its ok for obama to destroy the Constitution too?
TheMango121 1 year ago
Okay, I find myself unable to not comment on this. Yeah, Bush sucks. He is pure evil. When he's not getting his dick sucked at the Bohemian Grove, he is busy dumping depleted uranium into the water supplies in Iraq so that children are born with terrible ailments and deformities. But Bush isn't the only one that is evil here. Bush killed the Constitution, Obama will bury it. Obama just very well could be the antichrist. Keep that in mind when you sheeple are voting him in.
Indigo1285 3 years ago
what proper punishment for this regime than to put them away in a Federal pen for their disregard for human life and the laws.
Mephistonia 3 years ago
the problem with impeaching is that chenney and his lawer have set is up so that as long as we are in a state of war executive powers are unlimited and signing statements allow them to bipass the congress. we cant impeach, we have grounds but the system of checks and balances is no longer there to impeach them with
lmiller987 3 years ago
It takes a Democrat and Liberal to love the Constitution? Hypocrites! That's so SICK I don't know where to begin!
How about providing universal healthcare when the government is ready to fiscally explode? Who's going to pay for that? China?
How about it's Liberals that have created a welfare state, spitting all over the Constitution.
The Constitution isn't about providing, it's about preserving and defending, STUPID!
And make no mistake, Republicans DO have blood on their hands as well.
KendisKustomsDotCom 4 years ago
That's just about the most ridiculous reply possible. Health care and the supposed welfare state have nothing to do with the Constitution. As long as you raise the issue, universal health care would seriously reduce health care costs. We spend far more per capita then any other country while millions have no access and our health care outcomes are rated last in the industrial world. It took Bill Clinton (a Dem, not so liberal) to cut welfare 50%. The real welfare problem is corporate welfare.
lovethec 4 years ago
We wouldn't be about to fiscally explode if Bush hadn't cut taxes for the rich and pushed to fund an unnecessary 3 trillion dollars war... stupid.
zakkilhoffer 3 years ago
The Dems are no different. If they were, they would have impeached Bush already.
chrisytblair 4 years ago
I think they should have tried, but the reality is that Bush would never get convicted in the Senate. The spineless Republicans, who essentially have half the seats, would never buck the party line. There are many people who support impeachment that do not believe that the futility of the outcome justifies what would be an all-consuming diversion.
lovethec 4 years ago
It is sad that it is true. One more reason to vote for Obama.
miller4america 4 years ago
sad but true...:(
paweleve 4 years ago
At least Bush didnt have people killed for telling the truth.
Hillaryhater24 4 years ago
Okay, I'll bite. Who did Hillary have killed, and for what truth?
But as long as we're on the subject of people dying unnecessarily, let's not forget the hundreds of thousands that have died because of Bush's lies. Do I hear anyone saying "war crimes"?
lovethec 4 years ago
I think the power of the presentation gets lost with the inference that the Democrats have no blood on their hands. Too bad it had to be partisan. Both parties are two sides of the same corrupt/disgusting coin.
spirwarrior 4 years ago
To some extent you are right. However, the party has two parts, the constituents and the leadership. The vast majority of Democratic constituents are disgusted with the lack of backbone of the leadership. Whereas, the Republican constituents clearly favor candidates that would give us four more destructive years.
lovethec 4 years ago
I tend to think there is no clear difference between the Democrats and Republicans. We have had the same people in office for the last 23 years Bush and Clinton's. It's all about the neo con agenda and playing spades to get the next one elected. I have chosen to support Ron Paul as my candidate of choice. The man has 30 years of consistent voting and won't take special interest money.
Jamsie567 4 years ago
Jamsie, I agree. Next to Ron Paul, all the rest of them are like cheap whiskey.
chrisytblair 4 years ago
Hey, easy on the cheap whiskey. It's gotten many of us through rough days :)
zakkilhoffer 3 years ago
I googlenewsed 'youtube' and found a news article about this video. good exposure.
phillypa 4 years ago
"They are the unindicted coconspirators with Bush, Cheney & Co."
It's all about money to some. They all have ties to big business.
Albas666 4 years ago
"It takes a Democrat to love the Constitution." is alienating. Granted, the current admin has sullied their party, but you're no better when you lump a vast swath of citizens with Neocons and their unAmerican ways. Looking at Bush's approval rating, one can assume that many are unhappy with this admin. I'm an Independent that never voted Rep. But I'm sick of "us vs. them" politics. People feel powerless. We've created a nation of apathy and let these trespasses occur.
KJD808 4 years ago
I am sick of the "us vs. them" mentality. My republican friends were lied to as well and my democratic friends. All Americans were lied to. I don't want my republican friends to be made to feel solely responsible for Bush's policies as we are all responsible. My biggest concern is that election fraud is a very real issue that has not been fully addressed.
haysd2you 4 years ago
The Democratic leadership and a majority of the Democrats in Congress are complicit in their failure to exercise their Constitutional role as a counterweight to run-away executive power . . . spineless in their consistent funding of the illegal war in Iraq . . . gutless in their collaboration on the Patriot Act and other measures that erode our rights . . . cowardly in running from their obligation to impeach. They are the unindicted coconspirators with Bush, Cheney & Co.
meisenscher 4 years ago
Glad this is here, but stick to the Constitutionally impeachable offenses, of which there appear to be several. Violating treaties, for example, is not a violation of the Constitution despite the harm those actions may cause internationally.
FredericN 4 years ago