u just need that pen that writes on the screen to accomplish the perfectness of teaching physics online, (+a calculator in all vids :P) , other than that ur (y)
Please stop doing Physics explanations. Indeed, energy is ALWAYS conserved. For this problem should talk only about Mechanical energy or kinetic energy. This idea of ''energy wasted by friction'' etc is not correct. The answer is correct but the explanation is wrong, You are a great explainer ,but if you provide misleading explanations, we professors in engineering have to spend a vast amount of time correcting these misconceptions with only limited success. Prof Arun Srinivasa
wait, isn't friction always opposing the sliding direction? so in this case, because the bike has wheels, at the bottom of the wheels it is spinning left- so its sliding direction is left, meaning the the force from friction should go down the ramp, instead of up....? am i wrong? please correct me if i am
I'm a little confused what was the point of having the incline? Was it simply to get the height? I figured since you had an angle you would use, work = (force * cos theta) * d? Why didn't it apply here?
Isn't it easier if you used the work/energy relationship instead?
by that I mean:
total work = difference in kinetic energy.
where in that case, you calculate work done by friction, you calculate work done by gravity, you subtract them to find your total work, and you equate your answer to 1/2.m.v^2 to find your final velocity.
Maybe it's just a matter of preference, but good job!
THESE VIDEOS MADE ME COLOURBLIND FOR 5 MINS AFTER I SPENT 30 MINS OF WATCHING THEM... CANT SAY THEY ARENT HELPFUL BUT COLOURS ARE REALLY IRRITATING ... Hes got 2,000 videos so he cant just change them but next time try to tace care about things like these...
You SIR are AMAZING! I'm doing 12 A2 exams in January - 5 of which I need to teach myself! :(
I've always not liked doing M2 since I don't understand the textbook and I don't like bugging my teacher for help all the time. But now that I've found your videos, I'm finding mechanics more and MORE enjoyable! :)
You SIR are AMAZING! I'm doing 12 A2 exams in January - 5 of which I need to teach myself! :(
I've always not liked doing M2 since I don't understand the textbook and I don't like bugging my teacher for help all the time. But now that I've found your videos, I'm finding mechanics more and MORE enjoyable! :)
@Oneill9293 haha oh well, I was the one who signed up for it - thinking anything's possible as long as you put ur mind to it. xP And still believing! hehe :) Best of luck to u too m8.
man this guy SOO much better than my physics teacher...my teacher is so tedious, repetitious, redundant and monotonic in nature and teaching style. AND the worst part is you dont get it so you end up losing interest and getting bored to sleep, i mean this guy explained it in 10 FREAKIN minutes! whereas my teacher can spend three hours and i dont get it!
@Cryptically only if its constant. and its not constant because the guy will continously pedal making him go faster.You should multiply his acceleration with the mass and then multiply with the distance. This value can be added just like the friction was taken away. or add his acceleration and the acceleration of gravity from the begining it would make it alot easier.
It makes a lot more sense to me now that everything's explained step-by-step. Physics is so interesting, but still so frustrating to me because the concepts always seem so hard for me to grasp. I'm watching a bunch of your videos and they're helping tremendously. Thanks again!
I'd like to point out that since it's a bike (with wheels) the friction is not tire to ground. With wheels friction is in the same direction as motion.
In this case I guess it would be the brakes like you mentioned.
@tngbm Yes but the ground isn't moving with the wheels.
Example: Try stroking your right hand(Wheels) on to your left hand(ground) when your left hand(ground) is not moving. There is still some heat right? because the wheels are moving when there is intertia from the ground too. This creates the friction.
its because he is finding the negative work. The negative work is force time distance. This is why he does -60N * 500m because that is the negative work that the force of friction does.
I really like how you set this up using PE and KE. It should also be pointed out that the question can be solved by determining the components of Force Weight when the bicyclist is at the top of the hill, the subtracting the work done by friction from the work done by the Force Weight Parallel. This gives you total work, which is the same as KE. Then you can use your KE formula and go from there to calculate the velocity.
your videos are amazing our physics teacher isnt the greatest but she tries .. she admits your videos are better and uses them all the time to help us understand concepts thanks for sharing your knowledge
When determining the work done by friccion your calculations are incorrect since you are supposed to include the Angle at which the object is falling hence (-Mu*Mass*gravity*distance(cosine(5))
lol wat r u talkin about, when he gives u force of friction, FORCE OF FRICTION, it already includes the angle, ff=uFN, FN=mgcos(angle), he has ff, so u dont care about including the angle anymore its already been used to find Ff.
This, to some degree, is a potential energy problem, it definitely is a potential....huh huh huh.... a mechanical.... law of.... it's definitely a conservation of mechanical energy problem...
well the first spelling of colour when it was derived from latin to english was COLOUR.........The Americans, being oh so great *sarcasm* >.> changed not only that to "color" but also other words to suit them........I take it your american. >.>
Excellent explanation, and very helpful. Thank u so much 4 that, Jeff. I would like to request this kind of Conservation Energy problem with coefficient, like ice plane to sandpaper.
Wouldn't the friction be the same direction of the motion because the relative motion of the tires on the bike are moving in the opposite direction of motion so the frictional force oppose that motion. Meaning that the frictional force is moving down the hill!!!!
u just need that pen that writes on the screen to accomplish the perfectness of teaching physics online, (+a calculator in all vids :P) , other than that ur (y)
owaisoz 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
we just spelled the word how it sounded, which is how words should be spelled
MrPEDOCTOR 3 weeks ago
Thanks
theshark747 3 weeks ago
energy IS conserved its just converted into heat, that iswhy you don't get the total KE equal to PE at the beginning. you should've stressed on that
Zumerjud 1 month ago
isn't Wf equal to F∆rcosø? because W=F•r which is a dot product...
DaBojangler 1 month ago in playlist Physics
These video make my understanding better
adamaqmal 1 month ago
Dear Mr. Khan
Please stop doing Physics explanations. Indeed, energy is ALWAYS conserved. For this problem should talk only about Mechanical energy or kinetic energy. This idea of ''energy wasted by friction'' etc is not correct. The answer is correct but the explanation is wrong, You are a great explainer ,but if you provide misleading explanations, we professors in engineering have to spend a vast amount of time correcting these misconceptions with only limited success. Prof Arun Srinivasa
ArunSrinivasa 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
wait, isn't friction always opposing the sliding direction? so in this case, because the bike has wheels, at the bottom of the wheels it is spinning left- so its sliding direction is left, meaning the the force from friction should go down the ramp, instead of up....? am i wrong? please correct me if i am
beer94 2 months ago
Comment removed
beer94 2 months ago
Comment removed
beer94 2 months ago
I'm a little confused what was the point of having the incline? Was it simply to get the height? I figured since you had an angle you would use, work = (force * cos theta) * d? Why didn't it apply here?
TheRick309 3 months ago in playlist Physics
@TheRick309
friction?
TaraLynn218 2 months ago
our physics teacher doesnt explain that well, so we just play psp in class but thanks to you i understand all of it!! :D
jack390 5 months ago
am feeling you sir hear in nigeria,r u a professor of physo
oluwashehunaina 7 months ago
Isn't it easier if you used the work/energy relationship instead?
by that I mean:
total work = difference in kinetic energy.
where in that case, you calculate work done by friction, you calculate work done by gravity, you subtract them to find your total work, and you equate your answer to 1/2.m.v^2 to find your final velocity.
Maybe it's just a matter of preference, but good job!
stiffz 9 months ago
Comment removed
gratitudeforall 7 months ago
Comment removed
gratitudeforall 7 months ago
@stiffz thanks your way is quicker in exam! However I agree this video is helpful and helped me understand!
gratitudeforall 7 months ago
You are great at physics, thanks. Here's my two cents: the Windows' calculator has a scientific mode with trig buttons in the view menu.
plasmaluz 10 months ago
U r awesome man. Good explanation.
loik345 10 months ago
Wanted to say you saved me from failing my midterm! Thanks a lot keep it up
akhockey77 11 months ago
THESE VIDEOS MADE ME COLOURBLIND FOR 5 MINS AFTER I SPENT 30 MINS OF WATCHING THEM... CANT SAY THEY ARENT HELPFUL BUT COLOURS ARE REALLY IRRITATING ... Hes got 2,000 videos so he cant just change them but next time try to tace care about things like these...
Joseph1396 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You SIR are AMAZING! I'm doing 12 A2 exams in January - 5 of which I need to teach myself! :(
I've always not liked doing M2 since I don't understand the textbook and I don't like bugging my teacher for help all the time. But now that I've found your videos, I'm finding mechanics more and MORE enjoyable! :)
Thank YOU! :)
bhahmz 1 year ago
You SIR are AMAZING! I'm doing 12 A2 exams in January - 5 of which I need to teach myself! :(
I've always not liked doing M2 since I don't understand the textbook and I don't like bugging my teacher for help all the time. But now that I've found your videos, I'm finding mechanics more and MORE enjoyable! :)
Thank YOU! :)
bhahmz 1 year ago
@bhahmz 12? Shit, I'm bricking doing only 7 haha. Best of luck pal.
Oneill9293 1 year ago
@Oneill9293 haha oh well, I was the one who signed up for it - thinking anything's possible as long as you put ur mind to it. xP And still believing! hehe :) Best of luck to u too m8.
bhahmz 1 year ago
2 people are just as dumb as justin beirber.
bisharalol 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
u r g u d
Soviless99 1 year ago
i hope your gettin paid alot for these videos, because i learn more from you than from my teacher
281MeXiCaN713 1 year ago
THX! You just saved my sorry ass
snarper 1 year ago
man this guy SOO much better than my physics teacher...my teacher is so tedious, repetitious, redundant and monotonic in nature and teaching style. AND the worst part is you dont get it so you end up losing interest and getting bored to sleep, i mean this guy explained it in 10 FREAKIN minutes! whereas my teacher can spend three hours and i dont get it!
SmokerTJ 1 year ago
I love you so Much THANK YOU!!@!!@!@@ !!@!@!
slnj25 1 year ago
Thank you very much.understood than former:)
MsRoseapple 1 year ago
Hahaha Slide down a slide of sandpaper... HOT PANTS!
CrimsonSoul777 1 year ago
if the guy pedaled down, you would add kinetic energy to the potential energy right?
Cryptically 1 year ago
@Cryptically only if its constant. and its not constant because the guy will continously pedal making him go faster.You should multiply his acceleration with the mass and then multiply with the distance. This value can be added just like the friction was taken away. or add his acceleration and the acceleration of gravity from the begining it would make it alot easier.
ubercute1sf 1 year ago
how does it became 38.5 KJ..why did you convert that..instead of joules?..tnx ^^,
kennetchieful 1 year ago
@kennetchieful he ran out of spaces.
Taowhr 1 year ago
thank you soo much you were a huge help :)
tamerthelame 1 year ago
It makes a lot more sense to me now that everything's explained step-by-step. Physics is so interesting, but still so frustrating to me because the concepts always seem so hard for me to grasp. I'm watching a bunch of your videos and they're helping tremendously. Thanks again!
dsoviravong 1 year ago 2
if it is given only the coefficient of friction how can we find the friction force??
PeaceFighter2 1 year ago
my physics teacher's 70 or something years old who deserves to die. thanks so much for your videos, i get it now
nomania 1 year ago
I'd like to point out that since it's a bike (with wheels) the friction is not tire to ground. With wheels friction is in the same direction as motion.
In this case I guess it would be the brakes like you mentioned.
tngbm 1 year ago
@tngbm Yes but the ground isn't moving with the wheels.
Example: Try stroking your right hand(Wheels) on to your left hand(ground) when your left hand(ground) is not moving. There is still some heat right? because the wheels are moving when there is intertia from the ground too. This creates the friction.
sharikokaine176 1 year ago
he keeps SAYING the website, but how do you actually write it out?! zeeboo? zboo? zebu?
onlyAerik 1 year ago
@onlyAerik zebu.uoregon.edu
lumaix 1 year ago
sandpaper slides have got to be one of the most sadistic things i've ever heard ;)
DeflocculatedDentist 1 year ago
the calculator on my computer gave me 43.5
DeflocculatedDentist 1 year ago
its because he is finding the negative work. The negative work is force time distance. This is why he does -60N * 500m because that is the negative work that the force of friction does.
berberda 1 year ago
around 7:30 why is the force of friction, Force * distance. 60N*500m maybe I'm forgetting something hear.. please reply!
stealinglemons 2 years ago
I really like how you set this up using PE and KE. It should also be pointed out that the question can be solved by determining the components of Force Weight when the bicyclist is at the top of the hill, the subtracting the work done by friction from the work done by the Force Weight Parallel. This gives you total work, which is the same as KE. Then you can use your KE formula and go from there to calculate the velocity.
DartmouthAlum96 2 years ago
OMG! thank you so much!! my teacher makes everything seem so complex... idk whats wrong with him. he explains it so wierd...<3
ITyrantl 2 years ago
thank you soo soo soo much!
wahkimoocow 2 years ago
your videos are amazing our physics teacher isnt the greatest but she tries .. she admits your videos are better and uses them all the time to help us understand concepts thanks for sharing your knowledge
Whatsthedealwithit 2 years ago 31
OHHHH, I get it now! Thanks so much - this is a big help, and you explain so much clearer than my physics teacher!
azngirlchibi 2 years ago 48
i agree most of the teacher in school is only good at dump us down. They are trained to do that. so sad.
traidatnay99 2 years ago
When determining the work done by friccion your calculations are incorrect since you are supposed to include the Angle at which the object is falling hence (-Mu*Mass*gravity*distance(cosine(5))
Legalios 2 years ago
lol wat r u talkin about, when he gives u force of friction, FORCE OF FRICTION, it already includes the angle, ff=uFN, FN=mgcos(angle), he has ff, so u dont care about including the angle anymore its already been used to find Ff.
magicOcardOman2009 2 years ago
GREAT BASIC CONCEPTS
amrit2232 2 years ago
Thx! lots f help. This is like getting an educationl for free. :)
iamsiau 2 years ago
that is the whole point of his website! :D
abhinav777 2 years ago
This, to some degree, is a potential energy problem, it definitely is a potential....huh huh huh.... a mechanical.... law of.... it's definitely a conservation of mechanical energy problem...
lol
Nice video man!
obsdj 2 years ago 3
Thanks man =D
battlefort501st 2 years ago
you are my heroe!
laurence00vii 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
shortiee1816 2 years ago
HAHAHA clicking through each video in 2 sec. intervals: "welcome back", "welcome back", welcome back", welcome back", ......
studtulloss45 2 years ago 2
stop it!
xlwaiyiplx 2 years ago
i dont like that colour
Duckalore 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I don't like how you spelled color with a u
sjb167 2 years ago
go england!
megaelliott 2 years ago
well the first spelling of colour when it was derived from latin to english was COLOUR.........The Americans, being oh so great *sarcasm* >.> changed not only that to "color" but also other words to suit them........I take it your american. >.>
otuonyec 2 years ago
lol yee, we just spelled the word how it sounded, which is how words should be spelled
sjb167 2 years ago
yea thats what all americans i've said that to say lol..u've got like 6 dislikes because of that comment....
otuonyec 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I'm glad you can see that Americans are great.... because we are...
MUsnaredrummer 2 years ago
thanks a lot for thisw mann :p appreciate it! .. all your videos
m1dnightshadow 2 years ago
Hey Sal, u can do trig functions on windows calculator...select scientific in the 'View' menu. thx for the vid!
SilurianZ 2 years ago
Excellent explanation, and very helpful. Thank u so much 4 that, Jeff. I would like to request this kind of Conservation Energy problem with coefficient, like ice plane to sandpaper.
soepaygyi 2 years ago
Wouldn't the friction be the same direction of the motion because the relative motion of the tires on the bike are moving in the opposite direction of motion so the frictional force oppose that motion. Meaning that the frictional force is moving down the hill!!!!
emmanuelfaluade 2 years ago
thanks once again sal! keep doing this :D
sistematico17 2 years ago
the math is wrong... but it's good review
waterserpent1412 2 years ago
Great Videos!!! They have helped me study for physics and calculus a lot... What program are you using for the demonstrations?
TBRESS 2 years ago
Thanks so much for these awesome videos! They make a great test review for AP Physics BC
bj24563 3 years ago
I am taking Physics for the first time through a distance course and I find these videos not only interesting but very helpful!!
Thanks for taking the time
Jeff
hartj558 3 years ago
I like your videos. I've learned a lot.
idricool 3 years ago