Lord Monckton Returns on Alex Jones Tv 1/5: Climate Policy Deception

[MrTranscend1]

when alex jones and fox news are saying the same thing what does that tell you? climategate is a cia mossad deception

how obvious does it have to be that the common thread is OIL and imperialism

climate gate is a cia mossad deception designed to protect the military industrial complex

why is alex jones against avatar when the movie points directly to 911 truth

why is alex jones against the environment and pro oil when exxon and shell and haliburton are the biggest part of the NWO

[widebody123]

God help us. This village idiot Jones has a show that people actually listen to.

Anything Monckton is attendant to is guaranteed to be fraudulent and with nefarious purpose.

We live in scary times where uneducated deluded people like Jones can get funded to make a public noise that sadly gets listened to and, worse, believed.

[reksub10]

funny how he mentions good spies at the 4.25 mark when the monktons are very high up or thee highest british military intelligence family for decades...just one to ponder

[sdeevooo]

Alex has come a long way...the days are coming closer and closer. i hope he starts disclosing the Illuminati agenda and spark a little reptilian talk. he's got way too many viewers and listeners now.

[ironfalcon100]

The climate change ideology purveyed by the globalist elite is the most perverse in history...

[TheMrSirCharles]

Watch YouTube

JfA1LpiYk2o

duxG4lyeSlc

[pretorious700]

Are these the choices now? Obama or Palin? If so, we need a whole new political paradigm.

[zenwaiter]

fuck the nwo!

[Garciamrcool]

monkton is a lizard

[mystro810]

@Garciamrcool Are you Lizard conspiracy theorists serious? you really think that there are lizards masquerading as politicians and world leaders? Of course I am open to persuasion if you can call forth any evidence or even any hint of evidence.

[mraperish]

@mystro810 i think they mean he looks like one look at his face lol :P

[polevaultrockstr]

@mystro810 there are many ancient civilizations that discuss serpent like gods coming down from the heavens and mating with humans. In almost every corner of the world you can find religions based on this exact point. I beleive the theory calls these lizard people the annaunaki, which are supposed to be the gods that were the influnce of many global religions. Now how true this is I will not cl;aim to know cause I don't, just throwing some info out there.

[xxCrazySmooth]

@polevaultrockstr Hi David. Listen, we know you are a disinfo shill. Keep up the good work of sidetracking the masses with your bullshit. I'm proud of you! GOOOOOOO NWO!!!

[polevaultrockstr]

@xxCrazySmooth who is david?

[xxCrazySmooth]

@polevaultrockstr  nice try icke

[polevaultrockstr]

@xxCrazySmooth that's not a responce. I don't know who you THINK I am but your mistaken............... what does your comment even have to do with mine?

[xxCrazySmooth]

@polevaultrockstr Shut up David.

[polevaultrockstr]

@xxCrazySmooth your inability to even make a single shred of sense is reminiscent of the argument you presented in the beginning, which was no where to be seen.

[nexivdr]

@xxCrazySmooth you are a faggot, grow up boot licker

[xxCrazySmooth]

@mystro810 lol that's a great comment. I laught, thank you. 

[minnimerc]

O Dear, here we go again, Monkton is a dangerous clown, He will offer his arse to whoever is paying him, and he has a track record of lying.

He is one of the people who IS making a profit from this mess (global change) and will not let things like the truth get in the way. Please America research him before you trust him.

A Trojan Horse.

[zeratul1987]

you people do realize Monckton has no credibility in England, thats why he has to go over to America to fit in with the crazy tea party nutters just so he has a podium to speak on where people wont be fact checked on what he says.

[katkal3]

@zeratul1987 Of course he has no credibility, he goes against the grain, so the system will descredit him,just like alex jones has been discredited in u.s. as a nut, because he attacks the system ,but i don't let that sway me.

[zeratul1987]

@katkal3 you do realise that same 'system' in the UK is the one who fired a scientist for saying cannabis isn't dangerous and death by extacy is very unlikely. This was a very public, open debate with the scientists being able to present their findings and the government openly ignoring it. The 'system' isn't a collective as you would think. Monckton has been allowed to express his views here but we just trust demonstrable evidence more than hear say.

[Wh47n0w1517]

What..! Lord Monckton as an adviser helped to destroy the UK through Thatcherism and now he is in the USA, Rats leave a sinking ship.

[normalizetheworld]

Quite understandably, Alex might have found a strong supporter in England amid the evil forces under which his life is even threatened. But is there any sign that the supporter is really at odds with the highest family who is the integral part of the very entity against which Alex, and each of us, has been fighting? Remember, evils do not unite at the time of failure and easily split but none can be your friend.

[ryanjabbawalkie]

its awesome. he doesn't even know why monckton was in DC for the tea party.

btw. Fox News paid him to talk and he did nothing but praise beck, oriely, ect.

[Cl1mateAware]

Raj Patel the new Messiah?

Check out eco-messiah William Tarkovsky on facebook and youtube.

You decide

[SOSnUSA]

The Tea Party has been taken over. I Can't trust them anymore. They hail Palin as a leader. Do we need more evidence.

[Stepper11]

This guy is a hero. He may be this era's Lord Acton in many respects.

[korzym]

This is really one of the best conversations that I heard about the "global warming" scam. I will reference all the information from Mr. Monckton. I'm sharing this vid with as many people as possible.

[Arejek]

My theory is that global warming is a hoax to give the world government an excuse to control all the oil supplies. Unless oil beds naturally regenerate millions of times faster than what most geologists say... peak oil is still on my mind. If China or India used as much oil per capita as Americans, we we would have to like quadruple the amount coming out of the ground in a year. We are moving into an economy where the gov is going to ration everything! Maybe why reduced population is their plan?

[mikemb123]

its easier to impose something as a fait accompli

1st just do it, then come up with the rationalized reason and force people to accept it

[givethemahand]

Imagine a roulette wheel :

Red = Man-made climate change is real & we will mess things up REALLY BAD for coming generations.

Black = We keep doing what we're doing.

No problems. (if you are a climate change doubter,this is your bet)

Think about it: If you spin, yes..there's a chance you may land on Black and

you save a few $ as you burn your coal. But, if it comes up Red you're grandkids are in BIG trouble..you're completely screwing them over.

Go ahead.. spin.

[CaptainStern2]

@givethemahand You're not the first one to make this kind of argument. You wouldn't make it at all if you knew anything about economics and how small changes in prices can lead to starvation for millions of people. If Africa isn't allowed to become industrial then it will remain a hell hole forever. If we in the West further deindustrialise then we'll eventually end up likewise. So, no, it's not just a matter of losing a few $.

[givethemahand]

@CaptainStern2

We must avoid "small changes in prices"? Poor argument.

You think its better to accept temperature changes in zones where agriculture is marginal already? There are several computer models on what 2 degree increase in average summer temp would do to millions of acres of farm land that are productive now but would not be. And yes, some zones would become more ag friendly but the transition to other localities is itself disruptive and costly.

With significant economic impact.

[CaptainStern2]

@givethemahand it's not a poor argument when these increases arise from, for example, farmland used to grow corn is used instead to produce pointless bio fuel, which has already cost lives. Secondly what the hell makes you think we can change the temperature? Man's contribution to the warming of the planet is, at best, a tiny fraction of a degree.

[givethemahand]

@CaptainStern2 "farmland used to grow corn"

Corn ethanol is a bad idea. Science already knew that. Ironically, we took that path in America for the same reason we are slow to convert to renewables: Established Interests.

Corporate agriculture with millions of acres of corn, lobbied hard for corn ethanol...their motive?...profit .

Same motive as those that don't want to accelerate conversion to renewables. Established interests have political power.

That does not make them right.

[givethemahand]

@CaptainStern2

Further , as fossil fuels will become much more costly (see T Boone Pickens, supply vs demand projections) there is a long term negative economic impact with a slow change to renewables (much higher energy prices as fossil fuels run low)....vs an accelerated change to renewables that will take the pressure off energy markets. Climate change skeptics that base their argument on economics, are myopic as regards economic impact forecasts..and are not looking at long term scenarios.

[CaptainStern2]

@givethemahand You'd have to completely halt the world's industry to remove that tiny fraction of a degree we, maybe, contribute. Thirdly, computer models have been utterly discredited on this subject. The vast majority of the 'wonderful' alternative fuels are useless. Nuclear power, the only viable alternative is demonised by the very same AGW people. The supposed scarcity of fossil fuel reserves is exagerated by feckless AGW propogandists.

[givethemahand]

@CaptainStern2

you say: "You'd have to completely halt the world's industry to remove that tiny fraction of a degree"

Care to share your source of that info?

[no1froggy]

@givethemahand im just imagining that roulette wheel now,,,,ive now got to GUESS where the ball will land, so you are spot on that the climate change arguement is nothing more than a guess, & trying to use emotional blackmail regarding kids is pathetic, if you want to end up in a mud hut eating lentils & weeds go ahead but just keep it to yourself.

[givethemahand]

@no1froggy "so you are spot on that the climate change arguement is nothing more than a guess,"

Wow...you managed to put words in my mouth, miss my point and come to an illogical conclusion all at the same time.

I am not saying that climate change folks are "guessing'...i am saying they may or may not have interpreted the evidence correctly Can you be 100% certain that they are wrong?

And, if you think consideration of future generations i s "blackmail"...I feel sorry for you.

[no1froggy]

@givethemahand please dont feel sorry for me as im not the one going into hysteria on an unproven concept, i also dont live life on ifs, buts or maybes, & to consider future generations by scaring them on what you say ,,,,,,,,,"i am saying they may or may not have interpreted the evidence correctly "(aka guessed) is lunacy, the only evidence ive seen is a now debunked "hockey stick" graph & everything else has been predicted wrongly by a box of transistors & I,C`s loaded with 2nd rate software.

[givethemahand]

@no1froggy " i also dont live life on ifs,

I see...so you don't buckle up your kids when they ride in the car?...because there is no proof that you will be in an accident... and the government seat belt laws are

"blackmail".

I get it.

Your logic ( and morality) is behind reproach.

[no1froggy]

@givethemahand Did i say i dont buckle up kids when they ride in the car?,,,no i didnt, the difference is cars are real, cars i can see & car i control & not invented by financed scientists,so perhaps you should stop assuming without facts, & i think the term you were trying to use is "beyond reproach", but then thats due to your logic being distorted perhaps, or are you merely being a bit of a drama queen?.

[givethemahand]

@no1froggy

Ok..you don't like my roulette analogy.

Try this:

Take a #2 pencil.

Draw a 3 " circle representing the earth.

Now draw a 2nd circle representing the breathable atmosphere above the earth

(draw to scale).

Tell us what your picture looks like. What is the distance between the 1st and 2nd circle?

Answer: To draw this to scale, you merely draw the second circle directly over the first. There is no visible gap between them.

What does this tell you about the atmosphere?

[no1froggy]

@givethemahand It tells me that the earth & the atmosphere are not the same as two lines drawn with a no2 pencil, jesus where do you get these obsurd ideas from? or are you saying there is no atmosphere?, im sorry but you are never going to agree that there is sod all to worry about so its pointless conversing with someone who lives a life of perpetual fear of the unknown or unproven.

[CaptainStern2]

@kekemankek Ye l bet you've done some real extensive reading into this subject haven't you? We all believe you. The truth is you put your faith in 'scientists'/'experts' just like ignorant peasants would put their faith in priests and bishops. You're today's ignorant peasant fanatic, but your egotistical little mind means you will never see that irony.

[kekemankek]

@CaptainStern2

actualIy I have done a fair bit of reading into the subject, as I study meteorology and just completed a greenhouse effect and climate change course...your usage of the word "faith" confuses me, you don't really need to put "faith" into anything when you have empirical evidence mate, that's the beauty of it. Faith implies belief without proof, and that's what religion relies on. Science is based on verifiable evidence.

[CaptainStern2]

@kekemankek Sorry to break this to you, dude, but they sound to me like classic case indoctrination courses. As Monckton has demonstrated over and over again, there is no empirical evidence that proves the AGW theory. Empirical evidence doesn't equal whatever comes out of the mouth of a 'scientist', most of whom are button sorters, bottle washers and bureaucrats.

[kekemankek]

What the fuck? No empirical evidence supporting AGW? Comparing satellite IR spectra measurements to those from say a few decades ago shows that less and less IR radiation from the Earth is escaping to space. We also observe an increase in downward IR radiation, EXACTLY as should be expected. This is DIRECT evidence of an enhanced greenhouse effect. Moreover, natural variance alone cannot explain all of recent warming - solar activity for example, has been in a COOLING trend in last decades.

[CaptainStern2]

@kekemankek Look up 'Greenhouse Warming? What Greenhouse Warming?' by Monckton. Seperately though, if one reads the relevant books one can see that this movement has clearly been seized upon and nurtured by some very rich, powerful people, along with their very clever agents, for their own ends.

[kekemankek]

@CaptainStern2

I know not whether to weep or laugh when I read your comments, seriously mate, I give you examples of empirical evidence that you said didn't exist, you completely dodge my answer and urge me to read...what's that - RELEVANT books? Relevant book, eh, written by someone with no training -whatsoever- in climate science, hell, any science. Someone caught making things up over and over again.

Oh I bet he is very relevant, in your little world. Very relevant indeed.

Sleep tight.

[CaptainStern2]

@kekemankek That was a seperate point and nothing to do with monckton. The essay he wrote is very relevant and addresses your so called empirical evidence. Empirical evidence of what by the way? Empirical evidence that its been warming for a few decades? Well done. Empirical evidence that man has contributed to this significantly or at all? Sorry, don't see that.

[CaptainStern2]

@kekemankek and the claim that it's been getting hotter the past decade is a flat out lie. It's common knowledge now that it's actually been getting colder. The statistics you mention only cover the last few decades, as if the Earth wasn't around before then. We all know why they ignore it, because there's so much that contradicts their half baked theories. The climate gate emails have obviously escaped your highly selective attention.

[givethemahand]

@CaptainStern2 - I too have read that 04, 06, and 07 were marginally cooler than 03 and it seems that "snapshot" data is where some climate change skeptics hang their hat.

But 05 was hotter. Source - NASA

Perhaps long term trends give us a better view: "The ten hottest years in the period of 1861-2004) have all occurred since 1989. The warmest year was 1998, followed by 2002 and 2003 (tied), 2001, 1997, 1995, 1990 & 1999 (tied) and 1991 & 2000 "

Source- Woods Hole Institute

[CaptainStern2]

@givethemahand Oh God, I'm in an internet argument...

NASA is a branch of the state. One can only imagine how compromising anything they say must be. I must say that it's a bit rich to accuse 'climate change skeptics' of selective use of facts when you consider all the skullduggery 'warmists' have been proven to engage in.

[CaptainStern2]

@givethemahand The NSSTC, which is half NASA btw, shows a drop of about 0.5 degree C since 1998. Hmm, and this is when China and India were building coal power stations at an unprecedented rate. Why begin at 1861? Go back further, to even before there was any industry(and hence no manmade C02 whatsoever) and you'll see they were growing grapes, outdoors, in the North of England!

[givethemahand]

@CaptainStern2

Again, you assume too much. I am not saying that natural climate change hasn't occurred, or will not continue to occur. So go back as far as you want..but you're making a point that is not germane to the argument. Heck i'm not even sure that man made climate change is as significant as the Gore types say, or that we could change it if we tried. I merely point out that it is a significant gamble to assume the climate change folks are wrong..or that we can do nothing to mitigate.

[no1froggy]

@CaptainStern2 Just to add in case the "gullible" dont realise is that Lord Monckton was working with maggie thatcher which gave him access to privelidged information regarding the climate change fiasco, therefore he knows what games they are playing behind the scenes & obviously didnt agree with the public being hoodwinked,

he knows more than anyone on here but still people slag him off without a fraction of the knowledge he has, they would rather listen to greenpeace or a railroad engineer.

[givethemahand]

@no1froggy "he knows more than anyone"

You're right..we all should have realized he was a person of consequence, insight and integrity when he showed up at a recent PAC funded, PAC promoted Tea Party Express and referred to the event as "grassroots".

There is an interesting site called:" A detailed list of the errors in Monckton's July 2008 Physics and Society article"

Just google the title it will take you to url.

[givethemahand]

@no1froggy "

Lord Monckton was working with maggie thatcher which gave him access to privelidged information".

Really?....so why didn't he share that information with Mrs Thatcher?

"The danger of global warming is as yet unseen but real enough for us to make changes and sacrifices, so that we do not live at the expense of future generations"

- M. Thatcher

" Changes in atmospheric chemistry -- greenhouse gases, the ozone hole and acid rain warrant government action." M. Thatcher

[no1froggy]

@givethemahand you just dont get it do you, you are quoting a politician who had zero scientific background, this is exactly why Lord Monckton started to question & study in detail what was going on, when you have government memos etc going through your hands you would see stuff that we the public never hear about nor supposed to, the only proof of AGW is on peoples say so & zero evidence, & yes the acid rain, now where did that go?, didnt happen here as confirmed in my science lessons.

[givethemahand]

@no1froggy "you are quoting a politician who had zero scientific background"

Really?...thats odd.

Margaret Thatcher has a degree in Chemistry

The only degrees I can find for Monchton are journalism and classical studies.

Be sure to let me now how that supports your statement.

Oh.. and as regards acid rain: "Your science lessons" ???

So now you're the authority? There is a ton of data on acid rain, SO2 /NO2 emissions, subsequent regs and the reduction of acid rain after the Clean Air Act.

[givethemahand]

@no1froggy

FYI- The 3" earth with a breathable atmosphere that ( to scale) is not visible is a demonstration of how thin the atmosphere is ( not that there is "no atmosphere") and a demonstration of how most folks don't have a good understanding of this important fact. The exercise is designed to provide insight to the potential fragility of the atmosphere. I'm afraid you failed to understand the exercise.

[CaptainStern2]

@kekemankek For me, one of the most embarassing, humiliating things to be is a 'useful idiot' dancing to the will of string pullers. I'm meant to feel sorry for these people but sometimes it's hard to contain the contempt it inspires.

[kekemankek]

Alex welcomes back to the show British consultant, policy adviser, writer, columnist, hereditary peer Lord Christopher Monckton

Oh so not a climate scientist then? Oh well! Policy adviser will do!

Fucking sheep.

[danielnz1]

A lord only via inheritance, pseudo scientist Monckton, is an absolute no-body politically in the UK, but he is, a dangerous small-minded deceitful charlatan, in particular for the real bewildered and gullible, anywhere! What do Global warming deniers have against peer-reviewed Science, cleaner air and conservation of fossil fuels?

[prickett233]

@danielnz1

so i take it your all for carbon taxes?

[no1froggy]

@danielnz1 dont forget your psuedo scientists from Greenpeace & the IPCC who collude together to write B/S reports & has been proven so, & if you actually done your homework then youd find that the peer reviewing is done by fellow cabbage cuddlers with a bias towards scaremongering. but i guess the new querky religion comes before facts doesnt it.

[kekemankek]

@no1froggy

can't you see how fucking brainwashed you are? you're putting your faith in conspiracy theories over peer-reviewed science, without which you wouldn't be sitting on your computer typing the ignorant crap that you are. Science doesn't have a political agenda - you do. You're no better than religious fundamentalists. They believe what's written in an ancient book over what empirical evidence tells us, you place your trust in a few men wearing tin-foil hats.

[no1froggy]

@kekemankek please name the peers & their qualifications, also calling me ignorant then swearing & cursing me is a bit of a laugh, if you want to see ignorant then look in the mirror buddy as im not the one resorting to abusive language.

[kekemankek]

@danielnz1

amen

[2besavedcom]

Over many years we have all been lied to by our Govts. Not just our Govts but by Religous Leaders. We have been taught things that are not in Scripture & many have swallowed many lies by these false prophets. If you are a truth seeker please visit the web site which is displayed in our user name & take the time to read some of the articles.You will be shocked. THERE IS A GREAT AUDIO FOR YOU TO LISTEN TO. You WILL COME AWAY ASKING MANY QUESTIONS. REAL SHOCKING.

Blessings as you seek truth

[alecaf89]

Alex you fucking sell out. You don't agree with this guy on anything except government size and climate change.

[alecaf89]

@alecaf89 This guy is a serious neocon and you know it alex. Are you transforming into a neocon.

[unenergy]

"We are going to concede that Carbon Dioxide and other Greenhouse Gases which possess or mimic a dipole moment, will cause warming if you add them to the atmosphere.

We concede also that human kind is adding CO2 to the atmosphere at about the rate that the NOAA figures mention.

So we're not trying to pretend that we're not the cause of the CO2 in the atmosphere increasing, we're not going to try and pretend that that CO2 will cause no warming."

Lord Monckton Brisbane debate 29 January 2010

[sgentlemanjack112]

its not about left and right.

[tweed187187]

We will die before you take our freedom!

[alvisc2002]

@tweed187187 hey relax there braveheart lol

[tweed187187]

@alvisc2002 I did watch braveheart twice this month but i wasn't thinking that when i spearted that out xD God Bless America!

[smithbrain]

@tweed187187 I agree with you. I rather die on my feet then live on my knees

[katkal3]

@tweed187187 WE WILL KILL BEFORE YOU TAKE OUR FREEDOM!!!

[kamakazishark]

@tweed187187 somehow i think the motherfuckers who are pushing the agenda are ok with that

[whoareyapauldunn]

@tweed187187 thats probably what they have in mind.

[star2000dancer]

Some of the best research I've found. Just use search.:

The House of Bush: Born in a Bank"

[natruto]

3PO?!

[bkakaak47]

one of the best politicians in england

[ymsmusic]

@bkakaak47

And also denies 9/11 was an inside job.

[docatomics]

... as the illuision of democray & freedom falls to the gutter, perhaps reality shall take route in that same mind space & motivate civivliation to wake up & take responsiblity for the society they have collectively created. I sea know way this level of awareness except by self rule & informed consent when ablity enables any being to the levels we have achived.

[DirtyVegas7]

I don't know about Lord Monckton...he endorsed Palin for President...I DON'T THINK SO. Maybe Ron Paul....who is a REAL Libertarian/Constitutionalist they will really make some change. The Founding Fathers were trying to get after from English people like Monckton...hope I'm wrong about this dude.

[crypter27]

Lord Mockton kind of looks like Benny Hill & I agree with Lord Mockton 100%!

[earth666zoo]

insane

[WJValente]

The Left basically believes that government is a good thing and needs to be big and strong whereas the Right basically believes that government is a necessary evil, and clings to traditional values. Freedom lovers love freedom!

[drlax15m]

@WJValente and history shows only one side is right

[Michelle31015]

Ron Paul=2012

[yorkshirepuddiiing]

this guy don't seem right after praising sarah pailin.

[ionacaddy]

@yorkshirepuddiiing I think he was poking a bit of fun at her, at least that is what it sounded like to me. :-)

[TheLostRepublic]

Lord Monckton is the shit

[Black420Mamba]

if the new world order/one world government succeeds we will no longer be able to live life the way we want to. videos, like this one will be banned (if not the whole internet) and the freedom we once had will only be a faint memory leaving a bitter taste in your mouth and in the mouths of the ones you love.

[DanOlooney]

I think america was desinged to be a steping stone

[gzX9bVq6k]

I like how the peasants of the French revolution dealt with these parasites.

[hotblud82]

@gzX9bVq6k I am not pro-violence, but all the talking and voting seems to be getting us nowhere. I foresee a time of violence approaching....and the masses seldom lose.

[jhi1947]

WTF is a Lord Monckton?

[electrostatic1]

Invisible Empire was released last night. It's Jason Bermas' newest film.

watch?v=FeDSKzp-br4

Watch it and share it, very good primer for what has been going on.

Don't forget to by a DVD from pirsonplanet!

[gzX9bVq6k]

Conservatives are more sexy than than left wing liberal?

I suppose Hitler was off the scale when Eva Braun use to turn him on by shiting in his face.

[DonBasham1]

@gzX9bVq6k  wake up !! he was a socialist communist dictator ,, about the same as barry soetoro

[gzX9bVq6k]

@DonBasham1 yea, but he wasn't left wing.

[TheReallitycheck]

Why the F...K is the Georgia Guidstone still standing. By now I would have thought that someone would have blown it to KINDOM COME.

[TheReallitycheck]

@TheReallitycheck

KINGDOM.

srry. :)

[hotblud82]

@TheReallitycheck because the very same powers that wish its writings to come true are protecting it.

[TheReallitycheck]

@hotblud82

are they guarding that worthless piece of rock day and night?

[WoodlandRavah]

@TheReallitycheck

That's a mighty big sniper's target there those stones and some guns do ALOT of damage even if it's stone, know what I mean? Or even a remote controlled plane with a bag of acid... XD

[TheReallitycheck]

@WoodlandRavah

Got ya, I like the remote plane ALOT! :)

[hotblud82]

@TheReallitycheck yes, there are surveillance cameras on the stones. The county that the stones reside in own the land on which they sit. It is heavily suspected that Ted Turner is the real name of "R.C. Christian"; R.C. is the one that hired a stone company to build them in 1979. Once the stones were built, the land was deeded to the county...so yeah, government forces are the ones protecting those stones.

[TheReallitycheck]

@hotblud82

what a surpise, thnks

[wdcsucks1]

i wished AJ and lord monckton would address more the issue of Chemtrails

[drlax15m]

how many car bombs did the IRA set off relative to how many civilian casualties occurred? was their goal predominantly economic destruction with minimal civilian casualties? didn't they give warnings of all their major bombings to achieve this? what happened on the occasions when the warnings were not properly sent down the chain of command? did British intelligence engage in any false flags or use proxy loyalist extremist groups?

[drlax15m]

He was a top advisor to Margaret Thatcher? Ask him if he had anything to do with their policy in Northern Ireland during the Troubles with the IRA which only prolonged it unnecessarily.

[drlax15m]

was it a police state in the UK on bloody sunday when British soldiers shot unarmed civilians? how were the "common criminal" IRA prisoners treated? why did the British government constantly enter talks with IRA leadership, and why did they finally officially disarm after civil rights were granted and conditions improved, and they could legally participate in the political process?

[gzX9bVq6k]

@drlax15m, I like how the peasants of the French revolution dealt with these parasites.

[VoIPpoetry]

Aluminum capstone on the obelisk. significance?

[FractalZero]

@VoIPpoetry

Too cheap to buy a gold capstone.