based on Mahler's piano-roll recordings, this tempo is probably about right. But I prefer this piece slower in order to truly drink in the harmonies and textures. This is one of those musical pieces which deserves the orgasmic beatifice treatment.
The authentic performance practice people change their stripes whenever they hear this type of performance, what with all the portamenti and other such forbidden fruit. Mengelbereg was super-great!
I don't necessarily think that people look down on portamento as snobs, it simply went out of fashion, although I prefer it as being more expressive in certain passages. Mengelberg uses it quite often on the recordings that I have of him and they are none the worse for it.
Because Mengelberg was a huge fan (and friend) of the composer (as was Walter) this is probably about as close to the master's vision of what the movement should sound like. I know Mahler was a big user of the portamento in other works, so this is not surprising in this giving.
@tenorismo - Too bad that we don't have a COMPLETE Mahler 5th, from the Mengelberg baton. Despite certain swoops, from the strings, this Adagietto gives a FAIR indication of the Mengelberg conception of the piece ... never too-slow, nor overly indulgent. :)
Mahler was in the same room 20 years earlier when Mengelberg was conducting this exact movement, which leads me to believe that Mengelberg's take is what Mahler originally intended. Thankfully we have this recording as surviving reference as to the style intended by the composer originally....Today, the style is "milk every note as hard and as long as you can".... this is a breath of fresh air to hear! Thanks for posting!!!
i like how its not perfectly together, especially the glissando. it is more expressive with a slight variation in timing...you don't get this anymore with today's squeaky clean performances :)
What a stunning morendo at the end!!! Mengelberg had it right...he was probably Mahler's favorite conductor (and, quite ostensibly, the only one who got Mahler's tempi right--at least from what the literature shows!).
@lsbrother Har har har! What's going on: Mengelberg is using a low-power microscopic lens to examine the grooves of what - I guess - is a test pressing of a record. Quality control or publicity shot? I have no idea. Still, your cocaine hypothesis could be correct - this IS in Amsterdam, after all.
What a truly great performance! It's hard, after listening to this, to imagine it at any other tempo- what a shame it is that every other conductor except Walter drags this out as if it's the slow movement from Beethoven's Ninth. And what a great recording quality for a record from 1926! The portamento takes a little getting used to, but I think it's appropriate.
So true Mahler himself conducted this in less than 8 minutes, and the whole symphony he said should play for 45 minutes most performances are over an hour
That's how far off the correct tempo the conductors are, "wringing the rag" to squeeze as much out of each phrase. It destroys the proportions of the work aswell. Beethoven gets massacred o n tempo. There's a graph somewhere showing the huge entrpy of tempo over the last 100 years it's very interesting
Really, because Beethoven also said that a performance of his 9th symphony shouldn't exceed 45 minutes. Both anecdotes by either composer, I consider useless.
Mahler wrote Adagietto as the title of the movement, but stuck "sehr langame" (very slow) as a tempo indication.This gives lots of leeway to conductors to find a tempo.
I suspect that this is closer to authentic performance practice than todays rather 'cleaned-up' performances. Take your pick. There are some wonderful effects hear but also, to me some very distracting ones. Quite marvelous with some unearthly sounds being made.
Mengelberg and Mahler were good friends. Mahler discussed every part of the score with Mengelberg. And accordingly to a letter of Mahlers wife Alma Mahler, the interpretation of Mengelberg was exactly what Mahler wanted. May be you don't like the style, but it is what Mahler loved. 100% authentic, the authentic tempo, the authentic instruments, the authentic rubati and the authentic glissandi.
@kick030 My comment was an echo of the comment by Mick2CU. He had criticised listeners who did not understand Mengelberg's style. My comment agreed with him and was also about Mengelberg's critics, not about Mengelberg.
I love and admire Mengelberg as a conductor, and particularly his playing of this music, for exactly the reasons that you give!
Brahms, Elgar, Mahler. It may be appropriate to indulge in portamenti, though only the latter composer actually marked them in his scores.
Though only once in this movement, as far as I can see in the score.
If instrumental portamenti are an effort to give 'vocal' expression to melodic lines, one could ask if upward and downward motion merit the same treatment, or if there is an esthetical difference between an upward portée de voix and a downward degueulando :)
A typical Mengelberg reading in the Romantic school of conducting: full of colour (notwithstanding the recording), full dynamics range, tempo fluctuation.
The portamento seems to get a lot of attention here. But by the time of the recording (1926) it was already an anachronism. Conductors such as Strauss, Weingartner, Muck, Toscanini were busy getting rid of portamento in their recordings; while other Romantics (Furtwangler, Beecham, Walter, even Stokowski) were staying away from it as well.
Thanks everybody for your valueable comments. Usually people like to give rubish comments just to sound interesting. I agree, it is a great performance and I would think Mahler would have done the same. Afterall, Mengelberg championed Mahlers music and they respected each other well. Also the Concertgebouw had already played under Mahler himself. Thanks for download. Mahler is my fave composer for over half a century!
And the slides are amazing.Those really makes it a sensitive performances.If this would be performened this way today everybody would laugh.I love it.
One of the most beautiful interpretations of the Adagietto I've ever heard! It's such a pity that everyone plays it at a very low tempo today, as I think that this tempo represents the character of the music much better.
I agree; Mahler indicated "Adagietto," not the usual self-indulgent Largo we are so used to hearing today. Listen to Bruno Walter's NY Phil recording from 1947, also a sensible tempo; Walter knew Mahler!
Wow, listen to the liberal use of portamento! If a conductor id that today he would be jeered at, yet Mengelberg recorded this just a decade after Mahler died. I like it!
thanks for uploading rare recording. good to know how he conducted the music. obviously it sounds too 'romantic' to modern listeners. Look how he controls tempo based on affect.
i can understand the glissando in so much as this is a declaration of love to alma and they add a sense of sweetness to an otherwise passionate movement. i'd rather have a little too much sugar than none at all.
This is almost comical. All the sliding around by the violins. Mengelberg was a good friend of Mahler's and worked with him quite closely. So perhaps it was a practice of the day. Just sounds odd... But certainly worthy of interest to listen to.
Yes, to our ears it does sound 'odd' - but it is from another era, another time with different attitudes, and styles of playing and conducting. It is still heartfelt and beautiful and very soothing to listen to. As an historic sound document the criteria for judgement is a little different than if it was a contemporary recording.
Wonderful! When I hear this piece, I always recollect what I felt when I saw the last scene of a 1971 film by Luchino Visconti, "Morte A Venezia" (A Death in Venice)...This piece was so haunting in the scene...
My father loved that film. He always wanted to watch it with me when I visited. I don't like the movie but the music is perfect.
On antther note, Mahler performed music much like this performance I'll bet. I think he was one of those who paced slowly and let the players enter almost at will. Just another way of performing music.
finally i find the adagietto that sounds more like a love song. :D
katiechan4 1 month ago
This is a wonderfully stirring recording, dense and yet transparent, unsentimental and yet very romantic. Great Mengelberg!
AfroPoli 3 months ago
gutstrings rule!
bbnjmnglrx 5 months ago
based on Mahler's piano-roll recordings, this tempo is probably about right. But I prefer this piece slower in order to truly drink in the harmonies and textures. This is one of those musical pieces which deserves the orgasmic beatifice treatment.
pelahale 6 months ago
@pelahale
Adagietto, not adagio !
You probably prefer a slower tempo because you listened very often to a slow version. Repeated hearings condition our taste.
1401JSC 4 months ago
@pelahale
Piano rolls had a limited time, so tempi were adapted to record whole musical chunks on one cylinder...
BTW at about 5mins, can't we hear a slight break in the recording, as if edited?
7:37 = 3 x 2½ minutes.
1401JSC 4 months ago
this is a recording exactly 85 years ago...any questions? i suppose not!!
oppgarden009 7 months ago
this is a recording exactly 85 years ago...any questions? i suppose not!!
oppgarden009 7 months ago
@oppgarden009
oppgarden009 7 months ago
@oppgarden009
oppgarden009 7 months ago
The authentic performance practice people change their stripes whenever they hear this type of performance, what with all the portamenti and other such forbidden fruit. Mengelbereg was super-great!
aardvaark069 8 months ago
I don't necessarily think that people look down on portamento as snobs, it simply went out of fashion, although I prefer it as being more expressive in certain passages. Mengelberg uses it quite often on the recordings that I have of him and they are none the worse for it.
MartinPadderborn 9 months ago
Because Mengelberg was a huge fan (and friend) of the composer (as was Walter) this is probably about as close to the master's vision of what the movement should sound like. I know Mahler was a big user of the portamento in other works, so this is not surprising in this giving.
flylooper 1 year ago
A great musical video or audio post ... thanks for sharing it with us.
Berdjum 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I have this recording beautifull blue label Columbia . And for emotional reasons I prefer it over a modern recording on a cd.
tenorismo 1 year ago
I have this recording beautifull blue label Columbia . The transfer is good. And for emotional reasons I prefer it over a modern recording on a cd.
tenorismo 1 year ago
@tenorismo - Too bad that we don't have a COMPLETE Mahler 5th, from the Mengelberg baton. Despite certain swoops, from the strings, this Adagietto gives a FAIR indication of the Mengelberg conception of the piece ... never too-slow, nor overly indulgent. :)
jhb134 1 year ago
I love the ''Adagietto'' from the 5th Synphony. It belongs to Austro-Hungarian period; another world . . .
Alessandro9427 1 year ago
@Alessandro9427 Yes another time , another place.
tenorismo 1 year ago
@tenorismo I love the history of the Austro-Hungarian Empire.
Alessandro9427 1 year ago
...very brooding, and dark without being heavy…
yanbu000 1 year ago
AWESOME drag recitative tempo. Great pro & con comments too....
yanbu000 1 year ago
les sons des violons sont exceptionnels ... la façon, dont la note change ... ouaaahhh c'est beau ! et le rythme est réussi ...
et dire que ce n'est pas mon interprétation favorite ...
Berdjum 1 year ago
Mahler was in the same room 20 years earlier when Mengelberg was conducting this exact movement, which leads me to believe that Mengelberg's take is what Mahler originally intended. Thankfully we have this recording as surviving reference as to the style intended by the composer originally....Today, the style is "milk every note as hard and as long as you can".... this is a breath of fresh air to hear! Thanks for posting!!!
fredg77 1 year ago
awesome!
paulostroff99 1 year ago
i like how its not perfectly together, especially the glissando. it is more expressive with a slight variation in timing...you don't get this anymore with today's squeaky clean performances :)
dkurgano 1 year ago
...text says this is a 1926 recording...Mahler could not be in the room as it was recorded..Mahler died in 1911........
j72050 1 year ago
AS IN SPIRITUALLY LOL
ahahahaa yeah not a tough one
StreeTRacR008 1 year ago
Lovely all that glissandi in the strings! Why did they stop doing that and sound most orchestra's at these days like a reformed church?
mulimansheid 2 years ago 2
i believe mahler was in the room during this recording
vertigo4298 2 years ago
What a stunning morendo at the end!!! Mengelberg had it right...he was probably Mahler's favorite conductor (and, quite ostensibly, the only one who got Mahler's tempi right--at least from what the literature shows!).
orgelspielerkmd 2 years ago
can someone explain what's going on in the picture at 1.24 onwards.
my guess is that it's a semi-automated cocaine snorter but I could be wrong
lsbrother 2 years ago 3
Comment removed
golovanov1 1 year ago
Comment removed
golovanov1 1 year ago
@lsbrother Har har har! What's going on: Mengelberg is using a low-power microscopic lens to examine the grooves of what - I guess - is a test pressing of a record. Quality control or publicity shot? I have no idea. Still, your cocaine hypothesis could be correct - this IS in Amsterdam, after all.
TheStockwell 1 year ago
Ah, gotta love the good ol' vinyl!
mahler151 2 years ago
intospective reading of this gorgeous piece by one of the greatest;
suggestion: the spindle hole is about 1-2 mm off-center, so we get a small bit of 'wow' but not too distracting
FredsBands 2 years ago
What a truly great performance! It's hard, after listening to this, to imagine it at any other tempo- what a shame it is that every other conductor except Walter drags this out as if it's the slow movement from Beethoven's Ninth. And what a great recording quality for a record from 1926! The portamento takes a little getting used to, but I think it's appropriate.
shellac1925 2 years ago 8
So true Mahler himself conducted this in less than 8 minutes, and the whole symphony he said should play for 45 minutes most performances are over an hour
pedrovski10 2 years ago 2
How could you possibly perform Mahler's Fifth in 45 minutes? The fastest recording I know (Walter's) still takes an hour!
shellac1925 2 years ago 2
That's how far off the correct tempo the conductors are, "wringing the rag" to squeeze as much out of each phrase. It destroys the proportions of the work aswell. Beethoven gets massacred o n tempo. There's a graph somewhere showing the huge entrpy of tempo over the last 100 years it's very interesting
pedrovski10 2 years ago
Really, because Beethoven also said that a performance of his 9th symphony shouldn't exceed 45 minutes. Both anecdotes by either composer, I consider useless.
Invisus944 1 year ago
this is a recording exactly 85 years ago...any questions? i suppose not!!
oppgarden009 7 months ago
@shellac1925
Mahler wrote Adagietto as the title of the movement, but stuck "sehr langame" (very slow) as a tempo indication.This gives lots of leeway to conductors to find a tempo.
1401JSC 4 months ago
I suspect that this is closer to authentic performance practice than todays rather 'cleaned-up' performances. Take your pick. There are some wonderful effects hear but also, to me some very distracting ones. Quite marvelous with some unearthly sounds being made.
aardvaark069 2 years ago
Zubin Metha said his two favorite conductors were Furtwangler and Toscanini
septip123 2 years ago
I love the use of portamento, the musical snobs who would laugh at this today obviously have no passion in their hearts!
mick2cu 2 years ago 15
@mick2cu No passion and no understanding for the correct style in this music.
AulicExclusiva 1 year ago
Comment removed
kick030 1 year ago
@AulicExclusiva
Mengelberg and Mahler were good friends. Mahler discussed every part of the score with Mengelberg. And accordingly to a letter of Mahlers wife Alma Mahler, the interpretation of Mengelberg was exactly what Mahler wanted. May be you don't like the style, but it is what Mahler loved. 100% authentic, the authentic tempo, the authentic instruments, the authentic rubati and the authentic glissandi.
kick030 1 year ago
@kick030 My comment was an echo of the comment by Mick2CU. He had criticised listeners who did not understand Mengelberg's style. My comment agreed with him and was also about Mengelberg's critics, not about Mengelberg.
I love and admire Mengelberg as a conductor, and particularly his playing of this music, for exactly the reasons that you give!
AulicExclusiva 1 year ago
@mick2cu if passion were to be measured by liking or disliking portamento, it would be easy.
bbnjmnglrx 5 months ago
@mick2cu Ho I agree with you, the lack of portamento makes me sick, particularly for this piece
petrof4056 5 months ago
@petrof4056
Brahms, Elgar, Mahler. It may be appropriate to indulge in portamenti, though only the latter composer actually marked them in his scores.
Though only once in this movement, as far as I can see in the score.
If instrumental portamenti are an effort to give 'vocal' expression to melodic lines, one could ask if upward and downward motion merit the same treatment, or if there is an esthetical difference between an upward portée de voix and a downward degueulando :)
1401JSC 4 months ago
A typical Mengelberg reading in the Romantic school of conducting: full of colour (notwithstanding the recording), full dynamics range, tempo fluctuation.
The portamento seems to get a lot of attention here. But by the time of the recording (1926) it was already an anachronism. Conductors such as Strauss, Weingartner, Muck, Toscanini were busy getting rid of portamento in their recordings; while other Romantics (Furtwangler, Beecham, Walter, even Stokowski) were staying away from it as well.
Camanesco 2 years ago
What is he doing? 1:31
ChalieChaplin 2 years ago
Thanks everybody for your valueable comments. Usually people like to give rubish comments just to sound interesting. I agree, it is a great performance and I would think Mahler would have done the same. Afterall, Mengelberg championed Mahlers music and they respected each other well. Also the Concertgebouw had already played under Mahler himself. Thanks for download. Mahler is my fave composer for over half a century!
hsoenario 2 years ago
i love those "sliding notes" at 0:26
glissando?
septip123 2 years ago 2
Portamento. A lost art in string playing
robertssje 2 years ago
...as well as the proper, practical use of the same in singing...
vincerooo 2 years ago
And the slides are amazing.Those really makes it a sensitive performances.If this would be performened this way today everybody would laugh.I love it.
jbguadaplayer 2 years ago 3
One of the most beautiful interpretations of the Adagietto I've ever heard! It's such a pity that everyone plays it at a very low tempo today, as I think that this tempo represents the character of the music much better.
Thanks for uploading!
hanserblich 2 years ago 3
I agree; Mahler indicated "Adagietto," not the usual self-indulgent Largo we are so used to hearing today. Listen to Bruno Walter's NY Phil recording from 1947, also a sensible tempo; Walter knew Mahler!
billyguns2 2 years ago
Wow, listen to the liberal use of portamento! If a conductor id that today he would be jeered at, yet Mengelberg recorded this just a decade after Mahler died. I like it!
billyguns2 2 years ago 3
I always thought it a shame that the recording engineers cut off the recording before the last orchestral whisper had completely faded, naturally.
wetland1955 3 years ago 3
thanks for uploading rare recording. good to know how he conducted the music. obviously it sounds too 'romantic' to modern listeners. Look how he controls tempo based on affect.
whitesandboy 3 years ago 3
I had fun moving the cursor backwards and forwards quickly from 3:40 to 7:35
munkybrain 3 years ago 3
At 6:55, it sounds like one of the bassists went to the low F a measure too early.
logenisti 3 years ago
Wow, good observation. Still, a great recording.
TedMichaelMorgan 3 years ago
Despite the crunchiness, it's amazing what an 82 year old piece of wax can portray. Thank you for posting!
RadioFreeSpike 3 years ago 2
Is the song on the Roger Waters concert?
sausagekiller 3 years ago
I feel this is the best performance of this movement.
nijnohin 3 years ago 2
It was universwal practice at the time. It's beginning to come back a little, too.
jabberwock01 3 years ago
i can understand the glissando in so much as this is a declaration of love to alma and they add a sense of sweetness to an otherwise passionate movement. i'd rather have a little too much sugar than none at all.
tzhuff 3 years ago 2
This is almost comical. All the sliding around by the violins. Mengelberg was a good friend of Mahler's and worked with him quite closely. So perhaps it was a practice of the day. Just sounds odd... But certainly worthy of interest to listen to.
iggyviola 3 years ago
Yes, to our ears it does sound 'odd' - but it is from another era, another time with different attitudes, and styles of playing and conducting. It is still heartfelt and beautiful and very soothing to listen to. As an historic sound document the criteria for judgement is a little different than if it was a contemporary recording.
wetland1955 3 years ago
Wonderful! When I hear this piece, I always recollect what I felt when I saw the last scene of a 1971 film by Luchino Visconti, "Morte A Venezia" (A Death in Venice)...This piece was so haunting in the scene...
transformingArt 3 years ago
My father loved that film. He always wanted to watch it with me when I visited. I don't like the movie but the music is perfect.
On antther note, Mahler performed music much like this performance I'll bet. I think he was one of those who paced slowly and let the players enter almost at will. Just another way of performing music.
TedMichaelMorgan 3 years ago