dip shit posted clip from a movie. mock bigfoot as you may. if you knew the evidence you'd have to be an imbecile to dismiss the possibility. although i suspect you are indeed an imbecile.
Beginning around .36 seconds you can see the bottom of the jacket. This is a man in heavy clothing and dim light and the repeated blurring is a dead giveaway.
Because the focus was blurred more than once I assume it was intentional and this is another attempted hoax.
It's also highly doubtful that Ol' Mr. Stinky would be proportioned to resemble a short, stout human, or that he would stop and pose in semi profile then continue to meander toward the camera. I also doubt that any who happen upon a real Sasquatch would stand in the open or follow the critter with no apparent fear.
The blurring hid the pants cuffs when the feet came out of the snow.
Regardless of what you say, I know this IS bigfoot. I know your just trying to hide the truth, so the gov. doesn't come kill it, like they did in Loomis, Wahington.
i've been doing research on bigfoot for 8 years and it looks like your video might be a hoax it does have some footage that seems to be real. so you might have actually caught the real onne this time.
Whats really sad, is people going on to You Tube, expecting to see REAL bigfoot footage. Then, getting pissed off 'cause it's fake. What a bunch of idiots. Oh...Santa Claus isn't real, but bigfoot is...Yeah right, gimme' a break.
Sure I can. One's own judgment may be flawed. If one's beliefs are based on one's judgment, the belief itself is questionable. I may believe in Santa Claus because people told me he existed when I was a kid. That doesn't mean that , A) my belief is 'just as reasonable' as anyone else's or that, B) there really is a Santa Claus. The "science" (or "available evidence) surrounding belief in bigfoot is AWFUL and is at odds with the identification of, probably, every species ever documented.
Matters of science and matters of faith are two different things. However, it's interesting you include bigfoot in that list. We don't have to "believe" in things that are proven to be real. You don't have to 'believe' in elephants because you KNOW they exist. Bigfoot, though, requires belief....which is almost always based on lies, legends, hoaxes and conjecture spewed out by nonscientists. There's no other animal you have to 'believe' in because they're all properly documented.
actually science has to do with faith as well, many times people believe science has proved something and it turns out to be wrong. So, if someone thinks science is the way to go then that is their belief/faith whether they like it or not they are believing in something that could be totally fake ha
Well, I'm not bragging about anything, let alone about being a "faker." I'd say there's nothing funny about people whose reasoning is so poor that they believe in bigfoot.
I only believe what I have seen, could be bigfoot, could be I was hallucinating while elk hunting... something large hairy and on two feet while not being a bear... and there were two of them, who knows, guess I should have shot at em huh?
Assuming you're using the word "believe" to mean roughly: Accepting the probability of the veracity of the creature's existence to be more likely than less likely based on a person's own judgment of the available evidence, could you please explain why that would require poor powers of reasoning in your view?
This is fake!!! I shot this off a TV in my basement. Oh yes - I shook the camera a little to give it that "Jesus Christ, there's a Bigfoot!!" look. Click on the 'more info' link in the upper right of this page to find out more. And please pay attention to the very first thing you see in this video: the words, "I've never believed in Bigfoot."
Keep watching and keep posting comments!! When we reach 10,000 views I'm going to tell exactly where this video was shot and under what circumstances. Maybe the new info will change some people's opinions on this footage of this 'legendary' creature!
It might be real. I believe in bigfoot but it could be a hoax. I've figured most hoaxes out. The suit might be bulky to cover the neck and the arms could be extensions from a store. You could also stand on tall shoes. I do think it's real.
So how could you tell it was a Bigfoot under the ghillie suit? I couldn't see who or what was wearing the ghillie suit. I guess it's possible Bigfoot may shop at Surplus stores? Who knows.....
Well, on my personal opinion. It's a very, very shocking and realistic piece of evidence. I don't know if it's fake or not compared from the people above me. But I think that it was either ACTUAL footage. Or, most likely edited to make it LOOK REAL. If there are really programs out there that can ACTUALLY make footage look more like this and realistic, then I'm going to say that it's definitely fake.
I have to admit it does look good. And as far as the patterson footage it has been picked over so many times and for so long by hundreds of experts. I think one of the most credible observations was by a costume designer, he stated that for the year 1967 costumes just didn't look authentic that in his opinion after viewing it and seeing actual muscle movement from the upper torso down to the hips and below that it is real. Who knows its sure nice to believe it is though.
im am sorry but this is fake i know it is the animal would be broader and longer arms than that waste of film man waste of film... ubt i still will look in to it maybe changing my mind
The truth about Sasquatch: It's simple really. It's a hoax that's gone out of control taking with it not too few dumb gullible people with it. But don't believe me. Ask yourself; If this thing is real why is it in a world that has so much technology can no one get a decent video of the creature? Digital cameras that focus automatically. Cameras in cell phones. Cameras everywhere, and the only ones to film this thing are out of focus wriggling cameras. Common sense tells you it's fake.
EXCELLENT post! I'm always amazed at how willing people are to believe the shoddy "science" associated with bigfoot. Other species are documented through scientific observation, physical evidence, etc. Bigfoot is the one and only critter people believe in based on a shaky (and unconvincing) film taken by a rodeo cowboy...and not ANY physical evidence - fur, poo, bones, bodies - at all. Faced with this fact, these folks tend to respond, "maybe they bury their dead," which is called "conjecture."
yes, the famous one where they are at that small pond near a forest, and "bigfoot" walks by. They film it, and the famous picture is the one where he is in the bigfoot pose.
Roger Patterson never admitted anything. You're thinking of the surgeon's photo of nessie. Both Roger Patterson and Bob Gimlin swore it was real their entire life. Do some research don't just shoot from the hip.
wrong. they admitted it was fake, i saw it on T.V. coz they r old now they just said it to fly by wateva. but then u cud think the government payed them to cover it up
i never type how i should over the internet. i leave my real spelling in school. i just type like u might do in a text message. with the 'u' 'duno' 'kno' etc.. just shorter so i can get less of the remaining character count to fit.
On a show on tv about myths and stuff. They talked about new videos and stuff of bigfoot and were talking about the original one, how they magnified it and found what looked like a zipper, and how the guy who filmed it admitted that it was fake after that.
They never found a zipper. The best scans of the best copy of the film have only recently been digitalized. (the original film has deteriorated) the film is not clear enough to be able to magnify it to see a zipper. Jeesh, the crap you people believe.
So what do you believe? That a fat guy lumbering around in an utterly unimpressive suit is actually of a species that's never been documented, found or photographed by ANY legit scientist? I hear all this talk about the 'butt crack' or 'hair weave' of the Patterson suit. Why doesn't anyone ever talk about the face? You know - the mask of fur with no discernible features? Name me another primate that has no face.
You are hopeless and only looking for a fight. Totally not worth the effort. Maybe you should do your own research instead of speaking about things you know not.
No, I'm hopeful that some bigfoot expert will tell me why they find the Patterson film to be so convincing when the 'sasquatch' in question doesn't even have a face.
Sorry man, you seem like a very nice guy, but I'm not buying the film. I've seen the enhancement before, and "enhancement" is indeed the right word - features are added that just are NOT there in the original film. It's not simply magnified, it's altered. Even so, I'm not convinced. And don't buy this 'experts say it's real' stuff. EVERY real make-up guy says it's a suit...and not even a very good one.
I understand. The facts of the film are, it cannot be proved either way. There is really no way to prove it's real, and it's never been proven fake. It's really up to personal opinoin and belief at this point.
The camera work makes me think fake but toward the end it looks pretty real thing is...When you see bigfoot you have to be more hidden then them so that they cant see you...to me it looks like nothing is obstructing the view
I wasn't aware of the rules regarding bigfoot sightings. By the way, does anyone know what a run-on sentence is any more? Why do people who know so much about bigfoot know so little about punctuation?
At 23 seconds, the end of the left sleeve appears to be square, like a coat. Bigfoot does not wear coats, because he has no pockets in which to put credit cards, so that he can then get into debt up to his paranormal eyeballs.
You still don't get it, this videos quality is so bad even the greatest scientist in the world couldn't tell what it was. Therefore this is fake until the quality does not suck super bad.
So you're a video scientist. A videologist, perhaps. I'm glad to have a member of the scientific community weighing in on this. Maybe you could examine this footage more closely in the VCR repair shop where you work. Or maybe one of the other scientists there would have an opinion on it, too.
An unknown 4th human morph maybe, as to what scientists would call it, the Enkidu morph???
MY standards are too high, patterson gimlin, the recent yowie footage, and the only yeti footage (with lioncloth in my opinion), is all I know of that is reliable.
For about a million reasons, no. You're assuming the suit still exists and that some moron would pay millions of dollars for it. The suit is nothing more than a prop from a piece of film. And there are MUCH more famous movie props that don't sell for THAT much. Hey, just ask the guy who bought the Georgia Sasquatch! He paid 50-grand thinking it was real. Let's see what he gets now that everyone knows it's fake. The Patterson film itself, though? Somebody's probably made some bucks on that.
How could you possibly know that the Patterson film is fake when there are reputable scientists who have demonstrated numerous reasons it is highly unlikely to be fake?
Who found these "reputable" scientists? Bigfoot hunters, maybe? Actually, look to some of the reputable make-up and special effects guys in Hollywood who know where the suit came from.
blood, Go to the butt crack shots. No suit has ever had both a tight butt crack and correct hair weave. Close up of foot shows toes lifting up prior to setting foot on ground. The muscle flexure in the P-G film has not been duplicated by any modern suit. End of story. It's real. Get used to it.
That is correct. Good call screamdr. Butt crack or not though, the general contours the whole suit follows are unlike any costume ever constructed. Monkey suits, no matter how good, do not adhere to muscle shapes the way the skin/hair does on Patty. I have been making costumes for 30+ years, I know what I'm talking about.
I'm glad someone with in-depth knowledge of every costume ever constructed is weighing in on this. For whom have you been making costumes for 30+ years?
What does it matter who I've been making costumes for? I know how costumes fit the human body. Besides, I have never seen a costume with muscle movement - ever. There are other reasons I do not believe it to be a costume, but I can see I'm wasting typing time on you.
So...there were suits WITH a tight butt crack but not the right hair weave?? Or suits with the right hair weave but the wrong butt crack??? And nobody in the world could possibly think to put them BOTH together in the same suit?????? How dumb are the people making these suits?
You are only repeating what you have heard others say, but you have not done the research to discover that it is not a Hollywood costume at all. Chambers eventually admitted that he did not make a suit for this footage, and that the rumors were just that - rumors.
And the 'bigfoot experts' are coming up with this stuff on their own?? Did 'screamdr' really come up with the butt crack observation all by himself? Here's a quote by make-up man John Vulich:
One guy wrote to me and said, "You know, Disney people looked at it and they said that it couldn't be duplicated." Well, Disney was never known for doing prosthetic effects. I'll tell you as a makeup artist looking at it, it's a guy in a suit. There's no doubt in my mind that it's a guy in a suit.
Oh man, I can't help it. I have to shoot hoops through the gaping holes in logic. Since when does anyone admit to NOT doing something? Did OJ "admit" that he didn't kill his wife? No, he DENIED that he killed her...the same way John Chambers may have denied making a bigfoot suit. He never claimed he did make it. But if you're letting ANYONE off the hook based on a simple denial, well, I guess OJ is wishing you'd been on his jury in Vegas.
I see. I have gaping holes in my logic for using the Occam's Razor principal, but you are being reasonable for thinking a person could make a costume like this?
What's the "Occam's Razor principle?" Is that some method of logic dreamt up in your Dungeons and Dragons coven? By the way, you spelled "principle" wrong. The way you spelled it refers to a school administrator.
It wasn't a typo; you used one word when you meant to use another. I guess I know what Occam's Razor is after all, but didn't know the name. So if we apply it to the Patterson film? Let's see: a rodeo cowboy takes a shaky movie of something, gathers no credible physical evidence to support his claim that he's filmed a bigfoot, then EVERY serious make-up/SFX guy who looks at it says it's a guy in a suit. The most obvious conclusion is....?
I suppose you have never seen the movie, "The Legend Of Boggy Creek." It was a movie made in the 70s about a bigfoot-type creature lived in the ARK-LA-TEX region, near the town of Fouke, AR. The video you posted is very similar of what was recorded there. In fact, the video looks like it was taken FROM the movie.
Did you film this on a six dollar camera, because it truly sucks. You must be mentally challenged to think this is real. You could have given good quality and faked it, but I guess you wanted to post this crap.
Thanks for the witty post. I've never said whether or not I think this is real, and I've never claimed I shot the footage. I merely POSTED the footage and am curious to know what people think. I'm sorry if you didn't pick up on that, but your clever post was most enjoyable.
The discription makes it look like you made this, anyways my main point was that cheap cellphone cameras make this look as though a 5 year old assembled the camera. I appreciate you weren't pissed off at my first comment.
Well, I'd guess there's not much time to focus if you happen to run into a bigfoot. The Patterson film is in pretty good focus, but it's definitely a fake, so go figure.
Very interesting post. I don't know anything about the BFRO, so could you tell us a little more about it? And how long are the arms on a Sasquatch? Thanks for this post or any other info!
Well, we all want to solve the mystery of bigfoot, don't we? If I'm fortunate enough to get 10,000 views of this video, I'll reveal exactly where I took the footage, when, and under what circumstances.
this looks real i think fucking bigfoot is real my friend went to this forest and he went about 3 miles deep and he sayed he saw bigfoot i dont really know i dont care really he might be fake or real this is what i think real 50% fake 50%
Good comment. I'm hoping people will share their opinions on this, whether they think it might be real or not. People have mostly been very respectful in this regard, which I certainly appreciate.
Four words: It does not exist. And the other comment here about blurry images: why is that? Why is every photo of one like that? People don't bring in a dead one because they'd kill the dude in the suit, and that would be murder. If people shoot guns at sasquatch like they film them, no wonder there has never been a specimen.
Touche' my co-scientist friend. As a man of science, you'll surely look forward to the morsels of information I shall dispense regarding this footage. When this video has had 10,000 views, I will share, on this page, exactly where and when this footage was shot...under what circumstances...and why it's blurry. All questions will be answered, but only after 10,000 views.
I have a sasquatch question. Are these creatures considered to be apes of some sort? And if so, do they have shorter, bowed legs (like apes) or longer legs, more like humans?
Well, for one thing, if you're out in the woods and you see something that looks like a sasquatch, you probably don't stop and take the time to set up your tripod...or get the best focus. You get what you get, I guess.
Well, I didn't say it was real. In fact, I said I've never believed in Bigfoot and asked what folks thought of this. Man, I'm surprised at how angry some people get over this! You seem to be so mad that you've forgotten how to spell or write a coherent sentence.
that is real
JavaDude606 2 weeks ago
big foot is not an amimal, no one wants to believe, fine, stick with your knowing
ahool69 5 months ago
dip shit posted clip from a movie. mock bigfoot as you may. if you knew the evidence you'd have to be an imbecile to dismiss the possibility. although i suspect you are indeed an imbecile.
cunnidvd 7 months ago
movie Boggy Creek
cammybammy 11 months ago
its not the film or camera that is out of focus. all bigfoots are blurry when looked upon. that keeps them from having to wear clothes.
39tommyboy 1 year ago
Beginning around .36 seconds you can see the bottom of the jacket. This is a man in heavy clothing and dim light and the repeated blurring is a dead giveaway.
HOUNDDAWG 1 year ago
Because the focus was blurred more than once I assume it was intentional and this is another attempted hoax.
It's also highly doubtful that Ol' Mr. Stinky would be proportioned to resemble a short, stout human, or that he would stop and pose in semi profile then continue to meander toward the camera. I also doubt that any who happen upon a real Sasquatch would stand in the open or follow the critter with no apparent fear.
The blurring hid the pants cuffs when the feet came out of the snow.
HOUNDDAWG 1 year ago
Nevermind. When I went to leave a comment there were none. Duh. I'm stupid.
CBALLZ666 1 year ago
Do you have nothing better to do?
Oh and first post!
CBALLZ666 1 year ago
real
Aswadnoor 1 year ago
I think it's a highly sexual robot roaming the woods in search of yew and tourlamine.....
Murdilizer 1 year ago
i hate when people try to copy videos thats a clip from "The Legend of Boggy Creek"
Copyright hello lol
italiano325 1 year ago
Regardless of what you say, I know this IS bigfoot. I know your just trying to hide the truth, so the gov. doesn't come kill it, like they did in Loomis, Wahington.
j88monroe 1 year ago
yeah thats bigfoot i dont believe its fake
glamaFez 1 year ago
why is it the footage is always blurred or foggy or the "creature" is like 10 miles away...lol
zerothehero83 1 year ago
i've been doing research on bigfoot for 8 years and it looks like your video might be a hoax it does have some footage that seems to be real. so you might have actually caught the real onne this time.
Michael360ification 1 year ago
Whats really sad, is people going on to You Tube, expecting to see REAL bigfoot footage. Then, getting pissed off 'cause it's fake. What a bunch of idiots. Oh...Santa Claus isn't real, but bigfoot is...Yeah right, gimme' a break.
jerryjoe88 2 years ago
why with all this technology people still seem to go looking for big foot with the worst cameras.
n8tivguitar 2 years ago
looks just like the one seen in Boggy Creek, so it must be real - who let it into your basement?
8laneblacktop 2 years ago
yes i know is real bigfoot. and i believe monkeys evolved humans
ioratiskrishserhetai 2 years ago
fred commented on my channel
ioratiskrishserhetai 2 years ago
Sure I can. One's own judgment may be flawed. If one's beliefs are based on one's judgment, the belief itself is questionable. I may believe in Santa Claus because people told me he existed when I was a kid. That doesn't mean that , A) my belief is 'just as reasonable' as anyone else's or that, B) there really is a Santa Claus. The "science" (or "available evidence) surrounding belief in bigfoot is AWFUL and is at odds with the identification of, probably, every species ever documented.
bloodredvinyl 2 years ago
I BELIEVE monsters, spirits, ghosts, bigfoot ,and santa clausoffcourse satan and jesus christ all are real. =my relegion is christian. ok guy
ioratiskrishserhetai 2 years ago
Matters of science and matters of faith are two different things. However, it's interesting you include bigfoot in that list. We don't have to "believe" in things that are proven to be real. You don't have to 'believe' in elephants because you KNOW they exist. Bigfoot, though, requires belief....which is almost always based on lies, legends, hoaxes and conjecture spewed out by nonscientists. There's no other animal you have to 'believe' in because they're all properly documented.
bloodredvinyl 2 years ago
actually science has to do with faith as well, many times people believe science has proved something and it turns out to be wrong. So, if someone thinks science is the way to go then that is their belief/faith whether they like it or not they are believing in something that could be totally fake ha
JenniferHerrera5 1 year ago
Nothing funny about bragging to be a faker.
BourbonWhiskies 2 years ago
Well, I'm not bragging about anything, let alone about being a "faker." I'd say there's nothing funny about people whose reasoning is so poor that they believe in bigfoot.
bloodredvinyl 2 years ago
I only believe what I have seen, could be bigfoot, could be I was hallucinating while elk hunting... something large hairy and on two feet while not being a bear... and there were two of them, who knows, guess I should have shot at em huh?
furoshus 2 years ago
you said:
"about people whose reasoning is so poor that they believe in bigfoot."
What does "reasoning is so poor" mean?
laughingcrows 2 years ago 2
Assuming you're using the word "believe" to mean roughly: Accepting the probability of the veracity of the creature's existence to be more likely than less likely based on a person's own judgment of the available evidence, could you please explain why that would require poor powers of reasoning in your view?
BloatedSensations 2 years ago
holy shidoodlies!!
icarteri 2 years ago
Thank you for the truth
fltply 3 years ago
I don't know, tell the truth. That would be the easiest way to know. haha
fltply 3 years ago
This is fake!!! I shot this off a TV in my basement. Oh yes - I shook the camera a little to give it that "Jesus Christ, there's a Bigfoot!!" look. Click on the 'more info' link in the upper right of this page to find out more. And please pay attention to the very first thing you see in this video: the words, "I've never believed in Bigfoot."
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago
i don't know have a bad quality i can't analize the video but it's strange how the bigfoot walk
cesaryugi 3 years ago
I, prsonally, have my doubts as to the validity of this film, There are some proportion issues and the movement seems force,,,I vote hoax
scottytheclown 3 years ago
Keep watching and keep posting comments!! When we reach 10,000 views I'm going to tell exactly where this video was shot and under what circumstances. Maybe the new info will change some people's opinions on this footage of this 'legendary' creature!
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago
its passed 10000?
drice92 3 years ago
It might be real. I believe in bigfoot but it could be a hoax. I've figured most hoaxes out. The suit might be bulky to cover the neck and the arms could be extensions from a store. You could also stand on tall shoes. I do think it's real.
glueface36 3 years ago
Looks to me like it might be a Gorilla Robot .....But I am not sure!!!
GorillaRobotFactory 3 years ago
So how could you tell it was a Bigfoot under the ghillie suit? I couldn't see who or what was wearing the ghillie suit. I guess it's possible Bigfoot may shop at Surplus stores? Who knows.....
mrclean34 3 years ago
What in the crap is a "ghillie suit?"
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago
fake ya ok real blruy and why
DillonGageVideos 3 years ago
Thanks for the post. Good to get some perspective on this.
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago
k the reson its blurred out is bcause its someone in a costume and who ever taped this didnt want anyone to no or someone taped ther tv
cutieshopping2008 3 years ago
So, you don't believe in Bigfoot OR grammar.
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago
Where and when was this taken?
Potterfan89 3 years ago
this is how u know its fake because u cant see anything its not that hard 2 figure out
tburleyjr 3 years ago
Well, on my personal opinion. It's a very, very shocking and realistic piece of evidence. I don't know if it's fake or not compared from the people above me. But I think that it was either ACTUAL footage. Or, most likely edited to make it LOOK REAL. If there are really programs out there that can ACTUALLY make footage look more like this and realistic, then I'm going to say that it's definitely fake.
Chaos10110 3 years ago
I have to admit it does look good. And as far as the patterson footage it has been picked over so many times and for so long by hundreds of experts. I think one of the most credible observations was by a costume designer, he stated that for the year 1967 costumes just didn't look authentic that in his opinion after viewing it and seeing actual muscle movement from the upper torso down to the hips and below that it is real. Who knows its sure nice to believe it is though.
shawnedell 3 years ago
it looks like evadence but its still blurry soo if some one could use photo shop to enhance
guitarphonatic 3 years ago
im am sorry but this is fake i know it is the animal would be broader and longer arms than that waste of film man waste of film... ubt i still will look in to it maybe changing my mind
Dano78229 3 years ago
The truth about Sasquatch: It's simple really. It's a hoax that's gone out of control taking with it not too few dumb gullible people with it. But don't believe me. Ask yourself; If this thing is real why is it in a world that has so much technology can no one get a decent video of the creature? Digital cameras that focus automatically. Cameras in cell phones. Cameras everywhere, and the only ones to film this thing are out of focus wriggling cameras. Common sense tells you it's fake.
Logqester 3 years ago
EXCELLENT post! I'm always amazed at how willing people are to believe the shoddy "science" associated with bigfoot. Other species are documented through scientific observation, physical evidence, etc. Bigfoot is the one and only critter people believe in based on a shaky (and unconvincing) film taken by a rodeo cowboy...and not ANY physical evidence - fur, poo, bones, bodies - at all. Faced with this fact, these folks tend to respond, "maybe they bury their dead," which is called "conjecture."
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago
yep. the video on my $50 digital camera even has an anti-shake feature.
keliata 3 years ago
not real...sorry
seankolker 3 years ago
i wonder what sasquatchs do all day anyway every video ive seen is them walking around they must die young of boredom hahaha
smashedwindowTV 3 years ago
that's fake you dunbass from ctbarmy01
amydoll12 3 years ago
I never said it was real. I asked for people's opinions. There's no need to call me a "dunbass."
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago
the guy who took the original bigfoot photo has already admited that it was fake
link4265 3 years ago
Is there one picture that's considered the "original bigfoot photo?"
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago
yes, the famous one where they are at that small pond near a forest, and "bigfoot" walks by. They film it, and the famous picture is the one where he is in the bigfoot pose.
link4265 3 years ago
Roger Patterson never admitted anything. You're thinking of the surgeon's photo of nessie. Both Roger Patterson and Bob Gimlin swore it was real their entire life. Do some research don't just shoot from the hip.
phoenixavenger 3 years ago 2
Yeah, the surgeon. I wonder what kind of operation ol' Nessie needed.
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago
wrong. they admitted it was fake, i saw it on T.V. coz they r old now they just said it to fly by wateva. but then u cud think the government payed them to cover it up
ALTRIX1 3 years ago
Um, sorry, no. Roger Patterson has been dead for quite some time now...he's not "old" now.
You probably saw Bob Gimlin, who's one of the dozen or so people who claim to be the guy in the suit.
Where did you learn to spell or type? You must learn everything you know from TV.
phoenixavenger 3 years ago
i never type how i should over the internet. i leave my real spelling in school. i just type like u might do in a text message. with the 'u' 'duno' 'kno' etc.. just shorter so i can get less of the remaining character count to fit.
ALTRIX1 3 years ago
I'm sorry, my bad....it was bob heronimous.....not gimlin.
phoenixavenger 3 years ago
no he didnt! where do u get ur info from?
GermanAmerican22 3 years ago
On a show on tv about myths and stuff. They talked about new videos and stuff of bigfoot and were talking about the original one, how they magnified it and found what looked like a zipper, and how the guy who filmed it admitted that it was fake after that.
link4265 3 years ago
yeah ok a zipper. sure
GermanAmerican22 3 years ago
They never found a zipper. The best scans of the best copy of the film have only recently been digitalized. (the original film has deteriorated) the film is not clear enough to be able to magnify it to see a zipper. Jeesh, the crap you people believe.
phoenixavenger 3 years ago
So what do you believe? That a fat guy lumbering around in an utterly unimpressive suit is actually of a species that's never been documented, found or photographed by ANY legit scientist? I hear all this talk about the 'butt crack' or 'hair weave' of the Patterson suit. Why doesn't anyone ever talk about the face? You know - the mask of fur with no discernible features? Name me another primate that has no face.
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago
You are hopeless and only looking for a fight. Totally not worth the effort. Maybe you should do your own research instead of speaking about things you know not.
phoenixavenger 3 years ago
No, I'm hopeful that some bigfoot expert will tell me why they find the Patterson film to be so convincing when the 'sasquatch' in question doesn't even have a face.
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago
Copy and paste this into search in youtube.
Patterson Footage-MKDavis 'Walking With Bigfoot' Enhancement
It will give you a good start. There is much better stuff out there, I will find more...if you are truly interested.
phoenixavenger 3 years ago
Sorry man, you seem like a very nice guy, but I'm not buying the film. I've seen the enhancement before, and "enhancement" is indeed the right word - features are added that just are NOT there in the original film. It's not simply magnified, it's altered. Even so, I'm not convinced. And don't buy this 'experts say it's real' stuff. EVERY real make-up guy says it's a suit...and not even a very good one.
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago
I understand. The facts of the film are, it cannot be proved either way. There is really no way to prove it's real, and it's never been proven fake. It's really up to personal opinoin and belief at this point.
phoenixavenger 3 years ago
My opinion is, this is SHIT!
Hatesrudepeople555 3 years ago
Do you think it's a real bigfoot, though?
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago
hmmm
The camera work makes me think fake but toward the end it looks pretty real thing is...When you see bigfoot you have to be more hidden then them so that they cant see you...to me it looks like nothing is obstructing the view
UltraManX10017 3 years ago
I wasn't aware of the rules regarding bigfoot sightings. By the way, does anyone know what a run-on sentence is any more? Why do people who know so much about bigfoot know so little about punctuation?
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago
At 23 seconds, the end of the left sleeve appears to be square, like a coat. Bigfoot does not wear coats, because he has no pockets in which to put credit cards, so that he can then get into debt up to his paranormal eyeballs.
screamdr 3 years ago
so like no wander the quality is so bad its not real.bye the way,how much did that suit cost?burn
fireandflames23 3 years ago
Finally, an academic chimes in!
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago
No, this video is a hoax. If any of these people are scientist's and believe in this to be "legit", they should quit their profession.
Thawing0yster 3 years ago
I should have asked this before, but what sort of scientist are you? I'm glad we at least have some scientists weighing in on this!
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago
You still don't get it, this videos quality is so bad even the greatest scientist in the world couldn't tell what it was. Therefore this is fake until the quality does not suck super bad.
Thawing0yster 3 years ago
So you're a video scientist. A videologist, perhaps. I'm glad to have a member of the scientific community weighing in on this. Maybe you could examine this footage more closely in the VCR repair shop where you work. Or maybe one of the other scientists there would have an opinion on it, too.
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago
Sure, just send me the video and i'll do my best to save this truly bad footage.
Thawing0yster 3 years ago
looks like a guy in a suit hobbling around, bigfoot have bigger hips.
Crassygyrinus 3 years ago
Are you saying that the legendary Yeti is a pear-shaped endomorph?
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago
An unknown 4th human morph maybe, as to what scientists would call it, the Enkidu morph???
MY standards are too high, patterson gimlin, the recent yowie footage, and the only yeti footage (with lioncloth in my opinion), is all I know of that is reliable.
Crassygyrinus 3 years ago
The Patterson film is fake, start to finish, top to bottom.
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago
Don't you think that if the Patterson footage was faked the suit would be worth more than the hoax
b1oatman 3 years ago
For about a million reasons, no. You're assuming the suit still exists and that some moron would pay millions of dollars for it. The suit is nothing more than a prop from a piece of film. And there are MUCH more famous movie props that don't sell for THAT much. Hey, just ask the guy who bought the Georgia Sasquatch! He paid 50-grand thinking it was real. Let's see what he gets now that everyone knows it's fake. The Patterson film itself, though? Somebody's probably made some bucks on that.
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago
How could you possibly know that the Patterson film is fake when there are reputable scientists who have demonstrated numerous reasons it is highly unlikely to be fake?
narfanoid 3 years ago
Who found these "reputable" scientists? Bigfoot hunters, maybe? Actually, look to some of the reputable make-up and special effects guys in Hollywood who know where the suit came from.
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago
blood, Go to the butt crack shots. No suit has ever had both a tight butt crack and correct hair weave. Close up of foot shows toes lifting up prior to setting foot on ground. The muscle flexure in the P-G film has not been duplicated by any modern suit. End of story. It's real. Get used to it.
screamdr 3 years ago
Your knowledge of the science of "butt crack shots" is impressive, indeed.
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago
That is correct. Good call screamdr. Butt crack or not though, the general contours the whole suit follows are unlike any costume ever constructed. Monkey suits, no matter how good, do not adhere to muscle shapes the way the skin/hair does on Patty. I have been making costumes for 30+ years, I know what I'm talking about.
narfanoid 3 years ago
I'm glad someone with in-depth knowledge of every costume ever constructed is weighing in on this. For whom have you been making costumes for 30+ years?
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago
What does it matter who I've been making costumes for? I know how costumes fit the human body. Besides, I have never seen a costume with muscle movement - ever. There are other reasons I do not believe it to be a costume, but I can see I'm wasting typing time on you.
narfanoid 3 years ago
So...there were suits WITH a tight butt crack but not the right hair weave?? Or suits with the right hair weave but the wrong butt crack??? And nobody in the world could possibly think to put them BOTH together in the same suit?????? How dumb are the people making these suits?
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago
You are only repeating what you have heard others say, but you have not done the research to discover that it is not a Hollywood costume at all. Chambers eventually admitted that he did not make a suit for this footage, and that the rumors were just that - rumors.
narfanoid 3 years ago
And the 'bigfoot experts' are coming up with this stuff on their own?? Did 'screamdr' really come up with the butt crack observation all by himself? Here's a quote by make-up man John Vulich:
One guy wrote to me and said, "You know, Disney people looked at it and they said that it couldn't be duplicated." Well, Disney was never known for doing prosthetic effects. I'll tell you as a makeup artist looking at it, it's a guy in a suit. There's no doubt in my mind that it's a guy in a suit.
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago
Oh man, I can't help it. I have to shoot hoops through the gaping holes in logic. Since when does anyone admit to NOT doing something? Did OJ "admit" that he didn't kill his wife? No, he DENIED that he killed her...the same way John Chambers may have denied making a bigfoot suit. He never claimed he did make it. But if you're letting ANYONE off the hook based on a simple denial, well, I guess OJ is wishing you'd been on his jury in Vegas.
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago
I see. I have gaping holes in my logic for using the Occam's Razor principal, but you are being reasonable for thinking a person could make a costume like this?
narfanoid 3 years ago
What's the "Occam's Razor principle?" Is that some method of logic dreamt up in your Dungeons and Dragons coven? By the way, you spelled "principle" wrong. The way you spelled it refers to a school administrator.
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago
You don't know what Occam's Razor is and you're concerned about a typo I made?
narfanoid 3 years ago
It wasn't a typo; you used one word when you meant to use another. I guess I know what Occam's Razor is after all, but didn't know the name. So if we apply it to the Patterson film? Let's see: a rodeo cowboy takes a shaky movie of something, gathers no credible physical evidence to support his claim that he's filmed a bigfoot, then EVERY serious make-up/SFX guy who looks at it says it's a guy in a suit. The most obvious conclusion is....?
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago
You should really consider a new camera.
Hamburgler55 3 years ago
Point taken, Hamburgler. And you, perhaps, should consider ending your habit of stealing burgers from the innocent citizens of McDonaldland.
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago
I suppose you have never seen the movie, "The Legend Of Boggy Creek." It was a movie made in the 70s about a bigfoot-type creature lived in the ARK-LA-TEX region, near the town of Fouke, AR. The video you posted is very similar of what was recorded there. In fact, the video looks like it was taken FROM the movie.
I misspelled. It's Boggy, not Boggie.
USureRConfused 3 years ago
Reminds me of the Boggie Creek monster.
USureRConfused 3 years ago
And where is this 'Boggie Creek?' Could this be a haven for the Yeti???
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago
Did you film this on a six dollar camera, because it truly sucks. You must be mentally challenged to think this is real. You could have given good quality and faked it, but I guess you wanted to post this crap.
Thawing0yster 3 years ago 3
Thanks for the witty post. I've never said whether or not I think this is real, and I've never claimed I shot the footage. I merely POSTED the footage and am curious to know what people think. I'm sorry if you didn't pick up on that, but your clever post was most enjoyable.
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago
The discription makes it look like you made this, anyways my main point was that cheap cellphone cameras make this look as though a 5 year old assembled the camera. I appreciate you weren't pissed off at my first comment.
Thawing0yster 3 years ago
It's "description."
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago
really i made aa bigfoot fake movie with my frirnd and it wuz bad but this wuz just stupid mine wuz a joke but he wuz serious
c0tt0ntail456 3 years ago
Exactly, you honestly must perposely screw with your camera in order for this to happen. Annoying that it would even be considered legit.
Thawing0yster 3 years ago
Does someone consider this video "legit?" Is this someone from the scientific community?
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago
Yes, people do think this is real, which is why I find it to be so pathetic.
Thawing0yster 3 years ago
Are these people scientists? Do you think it's real? Is the video itself pathetic or are the people who think it's real pathetic?
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago
I wuz happi too see yur post! did yu plae bgfut en the moovy or wuz it yur frend?
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago
i did u like it? pretty stupid i wuz bored lol
c0tt0ntail456 3 years ago
yeh, butt yu wached itt and yu postid a comment
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago
i did
c0tt0ntail456 3 years ago
I should think that atleast one sasquatch video or picture would not be blurry. Funny how this happens.
Y2Ksurviver 3 years ago
Well, I'd guess there's not much time to focus if you happen to run into a bigfoot. The Patterson film is in pretty good focus, but it's definitely a fake, so go figure.
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago
The BFRO would need a complete report submitted first. Very interesting footage. At first I thought the arms were too short, but no problem there
bassmstrforhim 3 years ago
Very interesting post. I don't know anything about the BFRO, so could you tell us a little more about it? And how long are the arms on a Sasquatch? Thanks for this post or any other info!
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago
hey, where did u see this bigfoot yeti thing? i feel like wanting to solve this mystery first before anyone does...
Warriorx1220 3 years ago
Well, we all want to solve the mystery of bigfoot, don't we? If I'm fortunate enough to get 10,000 views of this video, I'll reveal exactly where I took the footage, when, and under what circumstances.
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago
this looks real i think fucking bigfoot is real my friend went to this forest and he went about 3 miles deep and he sayed he saw bigfoot i dont really know i dont care really he might be fake or real this is what i think real 50% fake 50%
Maxteris123 3 years ago
It's good to see a man of science chime in on this! Thank you for your interesting comment.
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago
Im not a scientist, but that looks pretty real.
Yellowfang429 3 years ago
if it wasn't blurred and shaky you could have been given more credit,but then we will all have seen the friend on a costume and yup!end of credit.
Pull not a bigfoot,but a bigtime leg.
pendragonU 3 years ago
Thank you for the comment, but I can't really tell what you're saying.
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago
I can't really tell how this is really Sasquie
pendragonU 3 years ago
Good comment. I'm hoping people will share their opinions on this, whether they think it might be real or not. People have mostly been very respectful in this regard, which I certainly appreciate.
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago
You wrote: "BIGFOOT Sasquatch footage! Is this real???" Short answer: no.
cochranexyz 3 years ago
What's the long answer?
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago
Four words: It does not exist. And the other comment here about blurry images: why is that? Why is every photo of one like that? People don't bring in a dead one because they'd kill the dude in the suit, and that would be murder. If people shoot guns at sasquatch like they film them, no wonder there has never been a specimen.
cochranexyz 3 years ago
I see that you're a scientist. This is obvious because of your ease with such scientific terms as "dude in a suit."
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago
And I can see you are as well.
cochranexyz 3 years ago
Touche' my co-scientist friend. As a man of science, you'll surely look forward to the morsels of information I shall dispense regarding this footage. When this video has had 10,000 views, I will share, on this page, exactly where and when this footage was shot...under what circumstances...and why it's blurry. All questions will be answered, but only after 10,000 views.
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago
OK then. But I smell a Georgia Sasquatch....
cochranexyz 3 years ago
There are no sasquatches in Georgia.
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago
Sure there are, one tried to make whoopie with my chevy blazer.
Shadowhawk30 3 years ago
Skunk apes instead?
Crassygyrinus 3 years ago
Lol, good question.
Malcontent1 3 years ago
I have a sasquatch question. Are these creatures considered to be apes of some sort? And if so, do they have shorter, bowed legs (like apes) or longer legs, more like humans?
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago
Yeah,that is a guy in a monkey suit. Legs are too short. Movements aren't natural. Nice try tho!
davidm5200 3 years ago
Why is there only blurry vids of all bigfoot footages. They all need better cameras with High Definition and a tripod.
I can't really tell if it's a man in a suit or not. Where was this vid taken?
rezcommander 3 years ago
Well, for one thing, if you're out in the woods and you see something that looks like a sasquatch, you probably don't stop and take the time to set up your tripod...or get the best focus. You get what you get, I guess.
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago
wat do u meen grammar srry i dont belive in little kid fairy tales anymore bud.o also you wrote is this real???heres an awmser for ya-NO
cutieshopping2008 3 years ago
Well, I didn't say it was real. In fact, I said I've never believed in Bigfoot and asked what folks thought of this. Man, I'm surprised at how angry some people get over this! You seem to be so mad that you've forgotten how to spell or write a coherent sentence.
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago
k bud im not even mad at all and ur kinda being rude like realyy bigfoot is stupid just my opinion and srry for typing bad and again im not mad geeez
cutieshopping2008 3 years ago
I do appreciate that you'd give an "awmser."
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago
o so i have bad grammar awmser
cutieshopping2008 3 years ago
wow your a nerd all you care about is spelling
cutieshopping2008 3 years ago
I care deeply about the futures of people who can't spell.
bloodredvinyl 3 years ago