i'm so bored out by how actors who play as nobles in old period dramas talk like robots, like really this is how they talk. or again is this a movie age gap i'm seeing. the actors' faces are not as zoomed in as they are in recent period dramas so they're facial expressions don't stand out as much
ok so without any rude comments. can anyone here tell me here if english noblemen really spoke to each other the way they're portrayed in really old period dramas. i noticed that in newer period dramas such as pride and prejudice, elizabeth by marie anne duff and becoming jane actors in those movies are more expressive. is what i'm seeing a difference in movie acting style. like 50s actors are over the top expressive if you compare them to current movie actors.
@dejablue18 Old period dramas were highly influenced by theatre. And in theatre, speech has to be somewhat over-enunciated and dramatic. It's just the style back then. It could also be said that in theatre centuries ago, writers would make sure that royal characters should speak and act significantly different compared to commoners (in an almost satirical way, to emphasize the fact that they come from a 'different' world). That's how I see it.
@dejablue18 Also, you don't have to be 'bored' of how actors in the olden days act. Acting, very much like language, culture, and every aspect of human existence is a fluid, evolving art form. Most films, in the past and present, are made based on norms that are prevalent at the time. So it's not that e.g. 2010 period dramas are more accurate in interpreting the speeches, it's just that 2010 films are made based on how people in 2010 would naturally act. Otherwise it would alienate the audience.
@dejablue18 As for English noblemen, it COULD be said that they did speak in a formal, regimented manner. This is true in Elizabethan times, and also somewhat true in present age. You see, noblemen, especially royals, think that every word that comes out of their mouths carry a certain weight and importance, which was somewhat akin to God speaking through them. Therefore they take speech mannerisms very seriously and would speak in a manner befitting the gravitas of their words.
Glenda jacksons Elizabeth I is the best. the Cate Blanchett Elizabeth films are shit because there completely inaccurate and starnge she becomes a god at the end of both films.
i don't care much for this Elizabeth. she's too...villainous to be admired or looked up to. personally, anne-marie duff and cate blanchett can be, at the same time, powerful and imposing yet 'nice' enough that you feel for them
@bookworm1138 - Actually, this portrayal is probably the closest to what the actual Elizabeth I was like. Not villainous, but strong-willed and aggressive. Remember she was a female ruler in a man's world. She had to separate her heart from her head; something which was very painful for her to do. Her dedication to her belief that she was divinely ordained to rule was exemplary. And her devotion to England has never, IMO, been equaled either before or since.
This woman was her father in print. Glenda really is my No.1 favorite Elizabeth indeed! I love both Henry VIII and Elizabeth. The tudor dynasty was one that was a great but damn near dangerous one. Just imagine if there was an heir? :)
what would be a real treat is to see all of these actors recreate this scene today--as they are about the ages today that they are playing in this scene. I don't know if the actor playing Howard, Burleigh and Walsingham are still alive, but the ones playing Bess, Leicester and Essex are.
..."Do not think that you can trick me! I have such cunning that if I were turned out of my kingdom in my petticoat, I will prosper anywhere in Christendom!"
@emmers57 She without could be a bitch, but she was much more than that. She also loved her people and gave up much for them - including probably her own personal happiness.
I was referring to Glenda Jackson, who is a member of Parliament and has been for some years. I am, of course, well aware that Elizabeth the First lived in the 16th century.
Glenda Jackson BRILLIANTLY tapped into her northern woman/working class roots to bring us the definitive Elizabeth Tudor - a monarch who had her finger on the pulse of the english people, who knew them inside/out, personified their character and pride.
I wonder if she gave Tony Blair as much trouble in Parliament as she gives to her ministers as Queen in these excerpts. I agree, however, that she is the Elizabeth the first for the ages, pace Bette Davis and Helen Mirren.
@Varese52 I rather like the idea of Glenda quoting soem of Elizabeth's speeches to Blair. Maybe she could drag up some of the shades of Elizabeth with Nick and David in the debates
4:42 to 5:32 --my favorite little bit in the whole series. I love Blanchett, I love Mirren, I love Davis, I even love Dench's relatively short screen time in Shakespeare in Love, but Glenda Jackson *is* Elizabeth to me.
i like this version of elizabeth I better than any other. this one is more believable since she was the queen. this is what she had to be like to survive and not let some man trick her out of her rule.
@jaysmic24 how was elizabeth II and queen victoria related to elizabeth I ? and the recent royal family, are they in any way related to the tudor dynasty? some of them claim to be, but elizabeth and mary and edward were the last tudors. they had no children.
The current Royal family is descended from Mary Queen of Scot's son James I of England ( =James VI of Scotland), who was taken from his Catholic mother and raised as a Protestant. Mary Queen of Scots was a cousin once removed from Elizabeth I . (Henry VII was their common ancestor.)
So, tho' Mary Q of S was never queen, all monarchs since have been descended from her. You can wikipedia "british royal family" for further info.
Yes, I think I first watched this back in the late 1970's when I was a teenager and fell in love with this drama! I did not realize then that Elizabeth I was actually Ann Boleyn's daughter. It was riveting because the screen play was so good! The costumes were magnificent with such attention to detail. I was looking to re-watch this for years and then finally found it on You Tube.
Mine, too. I also have the six wives of Henry VIII, and Anne of the thousand days. I love all those movies and the series- they just don't make really great stuff like that anymore- sure wish they did nowadays. Maybe one day we'll get something really good on HBO or some other movie channel.
I love this episode! The dialogue is scrappy, lively and makes you laugh! And when Elizabeth is reading the book and starts swearing- God, what a woman! I love it when she yells at Ralegh and tells him she would do just as well in her petticoat... well, what could he say to that?Some of the best lines of the entire series is in this episode- love it!
I saw this series when it first came out on PBS. What I like so much about it is that the dialogue and speech is much closer to the Shakespearean type that would have been spoken at the time. Unlike the today's colloquial English that so many modern adaptations have in them.
ABSOLUTELY!!! Nobody comes close, fine as Helen Mirren and Anne Marie Duff were. I love Cate Blanchett but she lacked the gravitas. Think I'll watch the whole Glenda series againit's been some time. Your comment has motivated methanks!
And thanks for the nice comment. Glenda played QE1 as an incredibly subtle and complex character, which she was. QE 1 has been my favourite historical person ever since I was 11 yrs old and just starting to study Tudor history. Enjoy the series- it hasn't aged a jot in the last 40 years!!!
Yes, she was a truly amazing and complex personality. She is also my favorite woman in history, and has been since I began studying Tudor History in college. I have always been annoyed by those historians who took a harsh view of her regarding Mary Queen of Scots, who in my opinion was a total jerk who deserved what she got. True, she was manipulated by those surrounding her, but she should have known better. Elizabeth reigns supreme! Vivat Regina!
I never thought I'd meet anyone who despises Mary Queen of Scots the way I do. She had no idea how to rule and botched everything she did. Fancy marrying the man she claimed had raped her!!!!What people forget is that QE1 spared her wretched life for EIGHTEEN years!! Mary was a proven conspirator and yet QE1 was willing to let her live if she confessed. I agree- VIVAT REGINA!!
I suppose that living in our time has dulled our understanding of how powerful a role religion played in her time. ER was wise enough to look beyond it, but one would think that Mary QS would have learned something about how not to behave after growing up under the influence of the nut-job Catherine de Medici, and if she knew anything of her other cousin the miserable Mary Tudor. I am a calligrapher and book artist, and refer you to the splendid volume"Elizabeth I --- Her Life in Letters"
She was indeed wise - I dare say that living under her mad sister's reign, she realised the stupidity of religious fanaticism and vowed not to make the same mistake. She did say that she wanted no window into another's conscience- very far-sighted for a 16th century ruler.Thanks for the mention- it's probably the only QE1 book I haven't got!!
@57monks Mary should have learned from Catherine de Medici; unfortunately, she never did. She was raised to be a Queen Consort. Spoiled and coddled, she believed from her time in France that being a queen meant she could do anything she wanted and have few responsibilities. She didn't see the hard work and sacrifices her mother and Elizabeth made.
@coralarch I agree! I think it's only because Elizabeth was a woman and people still expect women to be kinder and gentler. Not to mention, somehow being less than competent is "womanly". And Mary fullfilled the "woman's role" and had a baby, which, to some, STILL makes her a better person than the woman who ruled her own country for 45 years. Elizabeth did NOT want to execute an "annointed" queen; she eventually realized that it was literally her life or Mary's.
@happybkwrm Yes, you're right. Elizabeth was an amazing woman, able to charm, manipulate, bewilder and frustrate- all the while, she was keeping England safe from foreign rule. I think she's the best monarch England ever had. Mary was an ego-driven dimwit, and had her plots succeeded, we can only imagine the chaos that would have resulted. People moan about her fate- forgetting that Elizabeth protected her for EIGHTEEN years!! Yes, and executed her when there was NO alternative!
@coralarch - One of the best descriptions of Elizabeth I have read. Possibly one of THE greatest of monarchs-male or female-ever. Thank you for your insightful post.
@Cissy2cute Thank you for those kind words. Elizabeth has fascinated me since I was 10 yrs old. I am now reading a wonderful book titled "Elizabeth's Women"- highly recommended!!
It is the dress in the Armada Portrait. Cut and made by Jean Hunisett I believe. You can see the cut and construction of it in her book on Elizabethan dress.
this is best production of elizabeth thus far. thought provoking interpretation of her story. I claudius and wives of henry VIII also very good from the 1970's.
I agree. The greatest queen in history. And Glenda Jackson's portrayal, along with that of Bette Davis', is one of the best. Oh, Helen Mirren's as well. The most factual too.
"i have such cunning that if i were turned out of my kingdom in my petticoat i would proper anywhere in christendom!" lol! now that's a classic line and a very good one.
The only thing I don't like about this series is the Earl of Leicester. He was known as the Gypsy, for his dark looks, with tanned skin and BLACK hair. This Leicester couldn't be more opposite. Also, Leicester was much thinner, even in his old age. The Queen favoured those that were beautiful... when she was young her courtiers were all the good-looking women and men of the court. Leicester was also very athletic. They did a better impression, I think, of Leicester in the Helen Mirren adaption.
I agree; I've seen many productions on this queen and whilst each actress gave a good performance in their own right, Jackson's portrayal was just superb and wonderful all around. I think people of my generation are used to Blanchett as Elizabeth, and she is a great actress. But whilst Jackson was unforgettable in 'Elizabeth R' (certainly after so many years we still remember her performance), I have a hard time remembering Blanchett's latest take on the queen in the new Elizabeth film.
Cate Blanchett is great as Elizabeth but Glenda Jackson gave the best performance of Elizabeth R. Elizabeth R is still fantastic now as it was back then.
a wicked woman who doesn't deserve the artistry wasted on her by later generation
loggats 1 month ago
i'm so bored out by how actors who play as nobles in old period dramas talk like robots, like really this is how they talk. or again is this a movie age gap i'm seeing. the actors' faces are not as zoomed in as they are in recent period dramas so they're facial expressions don't stand out as much
dejablue18 2 months ago
ok so without any rude comments. can anyone here tell me here if english noblemen really spoke to each other the way they're portrayed in really old period dramas. i noticed that in newer period dramas such as pride and prejudice, elizabeth by marie anne duff and becoming jane actors in those movies are more expressive. is what i'm seeing a difference in movie acting style. like 50s actors are over the top expressive if you compare them to current movie actors.
dejablue18 2 months ago
@dejablue18 Old period dramas were highly influenced by theatre. And in theatre, speech has to be somewhat over-enunciated and dramatic. It's just the style back then. It could also be said that in theatre centuries ago, writers would make sure that royal characters should speak and act significantly different compared to commoners (in an almost satirical way, to emphasize the fact that they come from a 'different' world). That's how I see it.
eriquerique 1 month ago
@dejablue18 Also, you don't have to be 'bored' of how actors in the olden days act. Acting, very much like language, culture, and every aspect of human existence is a fluid, evolving art form. Most films, in the past and present, are made based on norms that are prevalent at the time. So it's not that e.g. 2010 period dramas are more accurate in interpreting the speeches, it's just that 2010 films are made based on how people in 2010 would naturally act. Otherwise it would alienate the audience.
eriquerique 1 month ago
@dejablue18 As for English noblemen, it COULD be said that they did speak in a formal, regimented manner. This is true in Elizabethan times, and also somewhat true in present age. You see, noblemen, especially royals, think that every word that comes out of their mouths carry a certain weight and importance, which was somewhat akin to God speaking through them. Therefore they take speech mannerisms very seriously and would speak in a manner befitting the gravitas of their words.
eriquerique 1 month ago
Glenda jacksons Elizabeth I is the best. the Cate Blanchett Elizabeth films are shit because there completely inaccurate and starnge she becomes a god at the end of both films.
GCmediacourse 3 months ago
HER MAJESTY <3
sttar1982 3 months ago
i don't care much for this Elizabeth. she's too...villainous to be admired or looked up to. personally, anne-marie duff and cate blanchett can be, at the same time, powerful and imposing yet 'nice' enough that you feel for them
bookworm1138 3 months ago in playlist More videos from littlemisssunnydale
@bookworm1138 - Actually, this portrayal is probably the closest to what the actual Elizabeth I was like. Not villainous, but strong-willed and aggressive. Remember she was a female ruler in a man's world. She had to separate her heart from her head; something which was very painful for her to do. Her dedication to her belief that she was divinely ordained to rule was exemplary. And her devotion to England has never, IMO, been equaled either before or since.
Cissy2cute 1 month ago 3
and so i threw down in disgust Augustine's book City of God, cf 5:30 here when it opend with an argument i deemed totally irrational..
and had the Queen rebuked me as she rebuked Drake (was it Drake?) earlier i would have fallen on my knees.
Did they not know whose daughter she was?
WHAT A QUEEN!!! and what a performance by Ms JAckson!!!
Strefanasha 5 months ago
This woman was her father in print. Glenda really is my No.1 favorite Elizabeth indeed! I love both Henry VIII and Elizabeth. The tudor dynasty was one that was a great but damn near dangerous one. Just imagine if there was an heir? :)
sommerjoy2000 5 months ago
what would be a real treat is to see all of these actors recreate this scene today--as they are about the ages today that they are playing in this scene. I don't know if the actor playing Howard, Burleigh and Walsingham are still alive, but the ones playing Bess, Leicester and Essex are.
kendahke 6 months ago
This today is STILL great!
kieran196 7 months ago
Glenda Jackson just kicks ass!!!
emmers57 7 months ago 2
Whoa! I just watched this episode today on Netflix (Episode 5) and came upon this by accident! Great performances by all involved!
handsome102180 9 months ago
SHE IS THE BEST ELIZABETH EVER!
peterphan221166 10 months ago 8
what an unoble person this elisabeth was she killed the true england in favor of her own power ..what an shame
RedDeadRevolva 11 months ago
@RedDeadRevolva you'd have done the same given the exact same circumstances. Self preservation is the strongest drive in a human.
kendahke 5 months ago
@kendahke only if i wud be her ...but iam an other person ...what u say about self preservation is absolutly correct of course
RedDeadRevolva 5 months ago
..."Do not think that you can trick me! I have such cunning that if I were turned out of my kingdom in my petticoat, I will prosper anywhere in Christendom!"
How epic. Love it!
John081590 11 months ago 7
I always figured Elizabeth the 1st was probably a bitch, and damn it, if Glenda Jackson didn't pick up that ball and run with it!
emmers57 1 year ago 2
@emmers57 She without could be a bitch, but she was much more than that. She also loved her people and gave up much for them - including probably her own personal happiness.
brontewcat 1 year ago
@emmers57 Of course she was! She'd have been eaten alive if she showed any weakness!
happybkwrm 1 year ago
@emmers57 A woman in power during that era had to be smart, quick and diplomatic all at once. If not, they would have devoured alive.
It was a tough time for powerful women, even those lucky enough to have been born into the royal bloodline.
md991free 11 months ago
@md991free amen well said.....could not have said it better
elisabethkohler33 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@emmers57 A woman in power during that era had to be smart, quick and diplomatic all at once. If not, they would have been devoured alive.
It was a tough time for powerful women, even those lucky enough to have been born into the royal bloodline.
md991free 11 months ago
Jackson IS Elizabeth! God's Death and so shall she be..all others are mere pale ghosts and feeble usurpers. What a masterpiece!
mxylpx 1 year ago
All the woman who played Queen Elizabeth 1 were great on acting.lol Its great and brilliant.
snipesHE91 1 year ago
@CandlesInADaze
I was referring to Glenda Jackson, who is a member of Parliament and has been for some years. I am, of course, well aware that Elizabeth the First lived in the 16th century.
Varese13 1 year ago
Cate Blanchett totally copyed her perfomance.
dog321cat 1 year ago
wauw!!
1zwitser 1 year ago
Ah... men to command, a friend to comfort, enemies to crush... it's all in a day's work for Elizabeth.
happybkwrm 1 year ago 3
Glenda Jackson BRILLIANTLY tapped into her northern woman/working class roots to bring us the definitive Elizabeth Tudor - a monarch who had her finger on the pulse of the english people, who knew them inside/out, personified their character and pride.
Messylin 1 year ago
Amazing performence!
God, I love our history, our Monarchy and our Royalty!
324wilson 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Glenda Jackson was the best Elizabeth!
Yes, I am forced to agree with you, though I do like things about Davis and Mirren, as well. But Glenda wins, hands down.
Varese13 1 year ago
Elizabeth really kicked some Spanish butt when her navy defeated the Armada, didn't she?.
BlondeBardie 1 year ago
@BlondeBardie Well to be fair she won by luck
MelinaPendulum 1 year ago
I wonder if she gave Tony Blair as much trouble in Parliament as she gives to her ministers as Queen in these excerpts. I agree, however, that she is the Elizabeth the first for the ages, pace Bette Davis and Helen Mirren.
Varese52 1 year ago
Glenda Jackson was the best Elizabeth!
CodyC6969 1 year ago
@Varese52 Uhm...I don't think she lived long enough to even know Blair existed...about 300 years not long enough...
CandlesInADaze 1 year ago
@Varese52 I rather like the idea of Glenda quoting soem of Elizabeth's speeches to Blair. Maybe she could drag up some of the shades of Elizabeth with Nick and David in the debates
brontewcat 1 year ago
Glenda was brilliant in this role, fantastic actress. Have you got the death scene? I remember seeing it as a child.
Feisty1967 1 year ago
Ach, you skipped the interaction btw E and Dudley.
Nancyferrojr 1 year ago
4:42 to 5:32 --my favorite little bit in the whole series. I love Blanchett, I love Mirren, I love Davis, I even love Dench's relatively short screen time in Shakespeare in Love, but Glenda Jackson *is* Elizabeth to me.
alexandrakl 1 year ago
i like this version of elizabeth I better than any other. this one is more believable since she was the queen. this is what she had to be like to survive and not let some man trick her out of her rule.
elinheartstristin 1 year ago
this series is awesome used to watch it on PBS
jaysmic24 1 year ago
@jaysmic24 how was elizabeth II and queen victoria related to elizabeth I ? and the recent royal family, are they in any way related to the tudor dynasty? some of them claim to be, but elizabeth and mary and edward were the last tudors. they had no children.
elinheartstristin 1 year ago
@elinheartstristin
The current Royal family is descended from Mary Queen of Scot's son James I of England ( =James VI of Scotland), who was taken from his Catholic mother and raised as a Protestant. Mary Queen of Scots was a cousin once removed from Elizabeth I . (Henry VII was their common ancestor.)
So, tho' Mary Q of S was never queen, all monarchs since have been descended from her. You can wikipedia "british royal family" for further info.
Paules8460 1 year ago
@Paules8460 i did just that. and thanks for replying. :))
elinheartstristin 1 year ago
Yes, I think I first watched this back in the late 1970's when I was a teenager and fell in love with this drama! I did not realize then that Elizabeth I was actually Ann Boleyn's daughter. It was riveting because the screen play was so good! The costumes were magnificent with such attention to detail. I was looking to re-watch this for years and then finally found it on You Tube.
calebcakes 1 year ago
Glenda and Robert are two wonderful actors.
RoninOtter 1 year ago
Wonderful series, Elizabeth R. I have the entire set on DVD, it's one of my prize possesions.
KateFan 1 year ago
Mine, too. I also have the six wives of Henry VIII, and Anne of the thousand days. I love all those movies and the series- they just don't make really great stuff like that anymore- sure wish they did nowadays. Maybe one day we'll get something really good on HBO or some other movie channel.
TheChickadee8 1 year ago
Whoa,did they scream like that at the queen?
linegenrou 1 year ago
@linegenrou Yes... do not forget, she yelled at them just as much... after all, she got her father's temper
Jamestopboy 1 year ago
@Jamestopboy lol I think that came more from her mother.
linegenrou 1 year ago
I love this episode! The dialogue is scrappy, lively and makes you laugh! And when Elizabeth is reading the book and starts swearing- God, what a woman! I love it when she yells at Ralegh and tells him she would do just as well in her petticoat... well, what could he say to that?Some of the best lines of the entire series is in this episode- love it!
TheChickadee8 2 years ago 4
Magnificent, isn't she?! She was well known for her swearing - whenever she really lost her temper she really let fly!
KateFan 1 year ago
The lines about the petticoat she really did say, too.
KateFan 1 year ago
Best Show ever
scribendi777 2 years ago
Elizabeth- best queen ever!
evaperonfan 2 years ago 4
Her father= the worst king ever.
PrettyTigerlilly 2 years ago
That's actually not altogether true. He was a capable politician and Elizabeth herself admired him greatly.
spiegelhaus 2 years ago
And yet, Henry was a tyrant.
KateFan 1 year ago
I saw this series when it first came out on PBS. What I like so much about it is that the dialogue and speech is much closer to the Shakespearean type that would have been spoken at the time. Unlike the today's colloquial English that so many modern adaptations have in them.
farmerne 2 years ago 2
Glenda deserved her Emmy for this 200%!
Patrick3183 2 years ago
her hairline is far back
PumpkinIceCream 2 years ago
Yeah. Glenda shaved it. Dedicated actress.
PadrethePio 2 years ago
.... real great actors and an wonderful movie...
From which year is that ?
lamusicahera 2 years ago
Glenda- greatest screen Elizabeth 1 of all time.
coralarch 2 years ago
ABSOLUTELY!!! Nobody comes close, fine as Helen Mirren and Anne Marie Duff were. I love Cate Blanchett but she lacked the gravitas. Think I'll watch the whole Glenda series againit's been some time. Your comment has motivated methanks!
57monks 2 years ago
And thanks for the nice comment. Glenda played QE1 as an incredibly subtle and complex character, which she was. QE 1 has been my favourite historical person ever since I was 11 yrs old and just starting to study Tudor history. Enjoy the series- it hasn't aged a jot in the last 40 years!!!
coralarch 2 years ago
Yes, she was a truly amazing and complex personality. She is also my favorite woman in history, and has been since I began studying Tudor History in college. I have always been annoyed by those historians who took a harsh view of her regarding Mary Queen of Scots, who in my opinion was a total jerk who deserved what she got. True, she was manipulated by those surrounding her, but she should have known better. Elizabeth reigns supreme! Vivat Regina!
57monks 2 years ago
I never thought I'd meet anyone who despises Mary Queen of Scots the way I do. She had no idea how to rule and botched everything she did. Fancy marrying the man she claimed had raped her!!!!What people forget is that QE1 spared her wretched life for EIGHTEEN years!! Mary was a proven conspirator and yet QE1 was willing to let her live if she confessed. I agree- VIVAT REGINA!!
coralarch 2 years ago
I suppose that living in our time has dulled our understanding of how powerful a role religion played in her time. ER was wise enough to look beyond it, but one would think that Mary QS would have learned something about how not to behave after growing up under the influence of the nut-job Catherine de Medici, and if she knew anything of her other cousin the miserable Mary Tudor. I am a calligrapher and book artist, and refer you to the splendid volume"Elizabeth I --- Her Life in Letters"
57monks 2 years ago
She was indeed wise - I dare say that living under her mad sister's reign, she realised the stupidity of religious fanaticism and vowed not to make the same mistake. She did say that she wanted no window into another's conscience- very far-sighted for a 16th century ruler.Thanks for the mention- it's probably the only QE1 book I haven't got!!
coralarch 2 years ago
@57monks thank you for the recommendation.
sonjaxfactor 2 years ago
@sonjaxfactor what recommendation???
57monks 2 years ago
@57monks elizabeth r
sonjaxfactor 2 years ago
@57monks Mary should have learned from Catherine de Medici; unfortunately, she never did. She was raised to be a Queen Consort. Spoiled and coddled, she believed from her time in France that being a queen meant she could do anything she wanted and have few responsibilities. She didn't see the hard work and sacrifices her mother and Elizabeth made.
happybkwrm 11 months ago 2
yes, I agree. Despite my name, I prefer Elizabeth I.
evaperonfan 2 years ago
@coralarch I agree! I think it's only because Elizabeth was a woman and people still expect women to be kinder and gentler. Not to mention, somehow being less than competent is "womanly". And Mary fullfilled the "woman's role" and had a baby, which, to some, STILL makes her a better person than the woman who ruled her own country for 45 years. Elizabeth did NOT want to execute an "annointed" queen; she eventually realized that it was literally her life or Mary's.
happybkwrm 11 months ago
@happybkwrm Yes, you're right. Elizabeth was an amazing woman, able to charm, manipulate, bewilder and frustrate- all the while, she was keeping England safe from foreign rule. I think she's the best monarch England ever had. Mary was an ego-driven dimwit, and had her plots succeeded, we can only imagine the chaos that would have resulted. People moan about her fate- forgetting that Elizabeth protected her for EIGHTEEN years!! Yes, and executed her when there was NO alternative!
coralarch 11 months ago 4
@coralarch - One of the best descriptions of Elizabeth I have read. Possibly one of THE greatest of monarchs-male or female-ever. Thank you for your insightful post.
Cissy2cute 6 months ago
@Cissy2cute Thank you for those kind words. Elizabeth has fascinated me since I was 10 yrs old. I am now reading a wonderful book titled "Elizabeth's Women"- highly recommended!!
coralarch 6 months ago
she is supposedly la roux elly jackson's mom
sextyty 2 years ago
Guess what MY NAME IS GLENDA!
Glickerlips 2 years ago
That's nice, dear.
AdArmand 2 years ago
wow, the dress she is wearing in this scene looks a great deal like the one worn in the Armada Portrait. Magnificent performance and costuming!!
COYDOGBLUE 2 years ago
It is the dress in the Armada Portrait. Cut and made by Jean Hunisett I believe. You can see the cut and construction of it in her book on Elizabethan dress.
thirlestanelodge2 2 years ago
this is best production of elizabeth thus far. thought provoking interpretation of her story. I claudius and wives of henry VIII also very good from the 1970's.
jaysmic24 2 years ago 2
I love her as Elizabeth I
md991free 2 years ago 4
I LOVE this portrayal of Elizabeth sooooo much! it's my Favourite!^_^ I just love her!
fifteenminutesfoever 2 years ago 2
Few have tried. Still Glenda Jackson is still Elizabeth R. After all these years.
biko0909 2 years ago 21
Her performence as Elizabeth I is like performence of Helen Mirren as Elizabeth II.
324wilson 2 years ago 2
or even greater I must add!
324wilson 2 years ago 2
I agree. The greatest queen in history. And Glenda Jackson's portrayal, along with that of Bette Davis', is one of the best. Oh, Helen Mirren's as well. The most factual too.
Thomestecles 2 years ago 5
i love how she talks it just flows like water
Emu666 2 years ago 25
Probably the greatest potrayal of the Great Queen.
aeronuk1 3 years ago 5
Elizabeth- greatest queen in history
AndromedaMariaCarmen 3 years ago 4
Brilliant performance by Jackson.
ER II was a strong and noble sovereign
beloved by her people,
though not those of the Papist faith.
chitchant 3 years ago
do you not mean Elizabeth I not II
AZYRIELLAVESTA 3 years ago
Bien sur! I am so embarassed!
Thank you for that,
I was thinking of the fine BBC television series Elizabeth R.
chitchant 3 years ago
She was still Elizabeth 1st in that. what are you talking about?
hagvcutadfu 3 years ago
Yes, as you will see from the comment above yours, I was guilty of a typo. I corrected it to Elizabeth R, ie Elizabeth numero uno.
Am glad I did not live in Elizabethan times, or you guys would have me on the rack, then hung drawn and quartered.
chitchant 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
"papist faith", you rotten bigot. pipe down.
longerdaysdyings 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
She was baaad!
Thor13332 3 years ago
"i have such cunning that if i were turned out of my kingdom in my petticoat i would proper anywhere in christendom!" lol! now that's a classic line and a very good one.
paixx12 3 years ago
I love it when she yells, though they misplaced the petticoat quote. She said it to Parliament in the 1560s (1566, I believe).
sashsashsha 3 years ago
I have seen every Elizabeth and Glenda Jackson brings more to this role than any before of after her.
Listening to the dialogue is like listening to a literary reading. Fabulous writing.
thedivinemisswhite 3 years ago 3
A wonderful cast and superb dialogue. The best series on the period ever written. Glenda Jackson was born for this role.
starryian007 3 years ago
The BEST Elizabeth actress, ever!
You stepped through that answer like a barefoot child through nettles lmao
1shaydee1 3 years ago 3
"SPAWN of an INFAMOUS COURTESAN!!!!"
AdArmand 3 years ago 5
glenda woooow my favorite actress she is gorgeous
karkooooor 3 years ago
The only thing I don't like about this series is the Earl of Leicester. He was known as the Gypsy, for his dark looks, with tanned skin and BLACK hair. This Leicester couldn't be more opposite. Also, Leicester was much thinner, even in his old age. The Queen favoured those that were beautiful... when she was young her courtiers were all the good-looking women and men of the court. Leicester was also very athletic. They did a better impression, I think, of Leicester in the Helen Mirren adaption.
Jaihdev 3 years ago 4
i totally agree...Jeremy Irons was so much better even though he had grey hair.
jencalo 3 years ago
bitch is owning this role.
calispartan 3 years ago 2
Can someone write down, what she is shouting behind the door? I hardly can understand it. THX a lot!!!
Athene0712 3 years ago
Sounds like: "God's death!"
and afterwards: "Jesu, the rogue!"
May need double checking.
pwstlws 3 years ago
jackson IS the queen. for those who appreciate that, i nominate Anne-Marie Duff in the BBC production: The Virgin Queen as her true successor.
rukeyser 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
dang dats one ugly elizabeth.. rofl
shakaz01 3 years ago
She is THE Elizabeth I!
Patrick3183 3 years ago 14
Thank you for putting these up!
I have all these plays on DVD and it runs for 9 hours! I sit and watch it for a whole day!
ClarinetMadeofSteele 3 years ago 4
why can't men nowadays dress like Essex?
LadyAethelflaed 3 years ago
Happy Birthday Glenda Jackson:)
checkoutmyprofile 3 years ago 2
Before Cate Blanchett and Helen Mirren there was this........the definitive Elizabeth Tudor......in my opinion of course.......great stuff..........
rjddurhamnc 3 years ago 6
I agree; I've seen many productions on this queen and whilst each actress gave a good performance in their own right, Jackson's portrayal was just superb and wonderful all around. I think people of my generation are used to Blanchett as Elizabeth, and she is a great actress. But whilst Jackson was unforgettable in 'Elizabeth R' (certainly after so many years we still remember her performance), I have a hard time remembering Blanchett's latest take on the queen in the new Elizabeth film.
littlemisssunnydale 3 years ago
Cate Blanchett is great as Elizabeth but Glenda Jackson gave the best performance of Elizabeth R. Elizabeth R is still fantastic now as it was back then.
Spiritualized13 3 years ago 4
yes, the second elizabeth movie was a tad bit disappointing... but I still love the way she delivered the line, "I too can command the wind, sir!"
AngelusaRequiem 3 years ago 3
@littlemisssunnydale Before I saw the series Elizabeth R, Cate Blanchett 1998 portrait of Queen Elizabeth was my favorite. Now, it is Glenda Jackson
md991free 1 year ago
The BBC video set is available at Rasputin stores. You can order this too on Amazon.
ekateri28 3 years ago
I am American and we don't get this much over here so please post More PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!
mreese1 3 years ago 7
i love it! me and my boyfriend just love this bbc verson of Elizabeth!
meho2525 3 years ago
aah the armada dress very good recreation
christinedaae87 3 years ago