Thank you Smalin for helping me understand classical music! The side effect of this understanding of (in my opinion) the most complicated kind of music, is that I now enjoy even more almost all other kinds of music. What you're doing with these videos is one of the most important things I've seen on youtube, so thank you once again :) -Alex
Dear Smalin, this video is simply amazing! You combined many of your previous techniques.
I love your choice of color and shapes for the lead voice...
At this point i have to say and congratulate you!---You have invented a new form of art. A musical painting... Here everything becomes important - sound, color, shape. And here too, you can repaint each melody differently. But i like rhombus and violet for the main voice. Very very important. Thank you!
really liked the animation between the diamonds. Captures the "lingeringness" of the note perfectly. Think there's a better term, but I don't do music.
I've seen the comments that some people think your playing is strange for this song, and I've never heard it before but I've looked around to try and find a better version but ultimately I think your performance of it is the best I've heard. You make the song haunting as it fits to be.
I'm sorry, but I just can't learn to like the diamonds and ovals. They look... cheap. Unpolished. The bars, as well as the ball animations of your earlier Chopin/Debussy animations (used for the strings in the earlier Brahms animations) worked, I think, very well to communicate it clearly and beautifully, and, especially with pieces like Chopin's nocturne in E flat major, the smoothly disappearing/reappearing notes perfectly showed the smooth 'floating' nature of the music, and sound in general.
This is the last song I've learnt, and this interpretation makes me rethink the way I play it...because this sounds haunting and sadder. Anyway, originality is positive, thanks for sharing this :)
@walterleipzig I play all the notes in the score, no more, no less ... but I don't play them the same way other people do. I don't care whether you approve; the question is: do you like it?
@smalin Yes it is very different. I'm no expert on this piece, but isn't there usually lots more rubato? It's interesting and quite atmospheric, but not as much energy/emotion as usual interpretations. Not sure if I like yet...
@banginghats2 More rubato? I don't know. There is certainly an opportunity for more. I wanted to bring out the languid, desolate --- and yet inexorable --- quality of the piece, and rubato wasn't appropriate for that. There are lots of ways to play it; this is just how I did it that hour of that day.
@salviatim I'd hardly say this was definitive ... I mean, I diverge in a significant way from the score ... I have no idea whether Satie would have approved ...
@smalin Not that I'm an expert, but considering his rebellious nature and flair for the odd and twisted, I find it hard it to believe he wouldn't approve of your diverging interpretation. I, for one, approve immensely. You've introduced me to whole new level of appreciation of this piece. why, thank you!
@einootspork I did the first Gymnopedie on my DVD, so I probably won't do that (at least, not until I sell the rest of the DVDs --- about a hundred of the original 1000 left to go). The other two Gymnopedies and the third Gnossienne are possible.
OK. Thank you very much for information. quiet easy after I hear it. Too easy composition. Therefore it is before mordern time. Thanks so much for musics.
I just want to thank you for the videos you put up. They give me a new way to see the structure of some familiar pieces while simultaneously entertaining me with very impressive performances. Kudos to you, keep up the good work!
@DJacKnifeAlpha It's strange: when I was playing it, it seemed like the dynamic contrasts were too big, but now that I'm listening to it here, I agree with you --- they should be bigger.
@BraunerSenf Oh, good ... because I don't have an answer. For me, what is expressed in music does not translate well into words. (If it did, I wouldn't bother with music.)
I did a guitar version of Gymnopedie no1--one of my all time favorite pieces. But this... as much as I always love your visual accompaniments, with this one I closed my eyes and was simply moved. Thank you.
@Dnava28 I don't think I can explain it in words. I've played this piece for decades, and this is where I've ended up (for now). It feels right. I know it's not the standard way.
I've watched too many of your videos. Perhaps aided by the simplicity of this piece, I was able to read it like sheet music and play along while watching for the first time. Which was fun!
@smalin I agree that it feels like 4/4; however, to say it doesn't matter seems like a bit of an overstatement. Doesn't the piece seem to stretch on endlessly and without pause, like a horizontal axis? I don't see it as coincidence or mere personal fancy that led Satie to make his decision.
@C0urante The rhythm is completely regular; whether you mark that regularity with barlines or not doesn't make much difference, IMO. There's lots of music written *with* barlines (by other composers) that also "seems to stretch on endlessly"; it's up to the player's discretion how to interpret the barlines. Satie left lots of things out of his scores, giving the explanation "for anyone who's musical, such indications are superfluous." This seems more like that kind of omission.
@C0urante Actually, I'll go further. Satie wrote many pieces that were very structured, that didn't at all seem "to stretch on endlessly," without barlines. So, I think it was just a habit (or, if you want to be less generous, an affectation --- he wasn't without affectation).
@C0urante Sure, any time. There was a time in my life (starting in the mid-1970s) when I stopped using barlines in my compositions. Now, when I go back and work on those pieces, I put the barlines back in. It's easy to ignore a barline that's superfluous, but finding your place in a piece that's very complicated and has no barlines can sometimes be difficult. So, while I generally follow the rule "less is more," I think it's okay to err on the side of prolixity, too.
@philateliceun yeah I agree, it defeats the purpose of the song to a certain extend. The high notes (at least in my view) show some optimism/ Hope contrasted by the sad and monotonous low notes, and it is that contrast that makes this piano piece -or even Satie's Gymnopedies- delightfully dark.
@dieferri If you listen carefully, you'll hear that every grace note is a little different --- much less regular than any other feature of the performance.
@maechel200 No, it's after the Romantic period. Satie was the same time as the Impressionists (like Debussy and Ravel), but he wasn't an impressionist himself (at least, most people don't think so). He was his own, unique thing ...
Beautiful, I love Satie. Thank you for this.
JustATadpole 6 days ago
Thank you Smalin for helping me understand classical music! The side effect of this understanding of (in my opinion) the most complicated kind of music, is that I now enjoy even more almost all other kinds of music. What you're doing with these videos is one of the most important things I've seen on youtube, so thank you once again :) -Alex
alexisrussian 1 week ago
I prefer this over the grace notes.
xxxvsxxx 1 week ago
Desolate! That's the word I was looking for.
ssw166 2 weeks ago
Dear Smalin, this video is simply amazing! You combined many of your previous techniques.
I love your choice of color and shapes for the lead voice...
At this point i have to say and congratulate you!---You have invented a new form of art. A musical painting... Here everything becomes important - sound, color, shape. And here too, you can repaint each melody differently. But i like rhombus and violet for the main voice. Very very important. Thank you!
AntuQum 2 weeks ago
@AntuQum Yeah ... isn't it cool? I'm so lucky to be involved in this ...
smalin 2 weeks ago
You are so talent ..
ahmed777jaber 2 weeks ago
Very nice, Prefer it to the original.
xSheepz 2 weeks ago
Sublime.
Liliumushasha 2 weeks ago
I took the bus for two hours to get to my boxing gym while listening to this song. It sets the solemn mood when I need it.
ArchaicMusics 2 weeks ago
really liked the animation between the diamonds. Captures the "lingeringness" of the note perfectly. Think there's a better term, but I don't do music.
Samwiseo00o 2 weeks ago
I've seen the comments that some people think your playing is strange for this song, and I've never heard it before but I've looked around to try and find a better version but ultimately I think your performance of it is the best I've heard. You make the song haunting as it fits to be.
ArchaicMusics 2 weeks ago
@ArchaicMusics I did the same thing, with the same results!
xbigd1988x 2 weeks ago
Smalin for president.
xbigd1988x 2 weeks ago
I'm sorry, but I just can't learn to like the diamonds and ovals. They look... cheap. Unpolished. The bars, as well as the ball animations of your earlier Chopin/Debussy animations (used for the strings in the earlier Brahms animations) worked, I think, very well to communicate it clearly and beautifully, and, especially with pieces like Chopin's nocturne in E flat major, the smoothly disappearing/reappearing notes perfectly showed the smooth 'floating' nature of the music, and sound in general.
AEFic 2 weeks ago
This is the last song I've learnt, and this interpretation makes me rethink the way I play it...because this sounds haunting and sadder. Anyway, originality is positive, thanks for sharing this :)
durumclapclap 2 weeks ago
Did you insert various grace notes? Cannot remember them from other interpretations. Not sure I approve...
walterleipzig 3 weeks ago
@walterleipzig I play all the notes in the score, no more, no less ... but I don't play them the same way other people do. I don't care whether you approve; the question is: do you like it?
smalin 3 weeks ago
@smalin Yes it is very different. I'm no expert on this piece, but isn't there usually lots more rubato? It's interesting and quite atmospheric, but not as much energy/emotion as usual interpretations. Not sure if I like yet...
banginghats2 2 weeks ago
@banginghats2 More rubato? I don't know. There is certainly an opportunity for more. I wanted to bring out the languid, desolate --- and yet inexorable --- quality of the piece, and rubato wasn't appropriate for that. There are lots of ways to play it; this is just how I did it that hour of that day.
smalin 2 weeks ago
@smalin Yes, it does have a very languid atmosphere in your interpretation. Always good to hear different takes on pieces like this.
banginghats2 2 weeks ago
It is soft and simple yet touching, it is on the Mozart,Beethoven or Vivaldi level, music dont need to be complex, it can be good like this one.
Apxovtac 3 weeks ago
La France du 19 eme siècle est un trésor perdu à jamais...
alexandrehachecet 3 weeks ago
@alexandrehachecet "La France du 21ème siècle est un trésor perdu à jamais" diront mes arrière-arrière-arrière-petits enfants.
Kuckooracha 3 weeks ago
Bravo!!!
MrSBA313 3 weeks ago
Did the person who wrote this live in communist Russia??
ipwnallnubscuzirock 3 weeks ago
@ipwnallnubscuzirock No, Paris.
smalin 3 weeks ago
@smalin It's fairly repetitive and depressing for someone who lives in Paris.
ipwnallnubscuzirock 3 weeks ago
@ipwnallnubscuzirock Read the history of Satie's life, and it might make more sense.
smalin 3 weeks ago
@smalin will do.
ipwnallnubscuzirock 3 weeks ago
your interpretations are definitive: p
excellent as always.
salviatim 3 weeks ago
@salviatim I'd hardly say this was definitive ... I mean, I diverge in a significant way from the score ... I have no idea whether Satie would have approved ...
smalin 3 weeks ago
@smalin Not that I'm an expert, but considering his rebellious nature and flair for the odd and twisted, I find it hard it to believe he wouldn't approve of your diverging interpretation. I, for one, approve immensely. You've introduced me to whole new level of appreciation of this piece. why, thank you!
facetubemyassplug 3 weeks ago
@facetubemyassplug I'd like to imagine that you're right, but I really have no idea --- I never met the man (he died before my parents were born).
smalin 3 weeks ago
Nice!
TheAPAnderson 3 weeks ago
My version has those appogiaturas as accicarutas o.O
clawtooth35 3 weeks ago
@clawtooth35 So does mine. But I don't play them that way.
smalin 3 weeks ago
So great, once again you manage to give this piece a totally different intonation to how I play it.
And it sounds all the more interesting and mysterious.
Thank you.
Tintenfix 3 weeks ago
Any plans to animate Satie's Gymnopedies, or is that too cliche? Maybe his other Gnossienne?
einootspork 3 weeks ago
@einootspork I did the first Gymnopedie on my DVD, so I probably won't do that (at least, not until I sell the rest of the DVDs --- about a hundred of the original 1000 left to go). The other two Gymnopedies and the third Gnossienne are possible.
smalin 3 weeks ago
OK. Thank you very much for information. quiet easy after I hear it. Too easy composition. Therefore it is before mordern time. Thanks so much for musics.
maechel200 3 weeks ago
This song makes you feel thrice as lonely.
cockatoo777 3 weeks ago
more satie do the gymnopedie 1 from the dvd!!!
willrelio2609 3 weeks ago in playlist More videos from smalin
I just want to thank you for the videos you put up. They give me a new way to see the structure of some familiar pieces while simultaneously entertaining me with very impressive performances. Kudos to you, keep up the good work!
realmensingtenor 3 weeks ago
I kinda wish it was a bit more dynamic, but it's fine though. :D Very soothing melody... Ahh.. I listen to this and have a lovely sleep..
DJacKnifeAlpha 3 weeks ago
@DJacKnifeAlpha It's strange: when I was playing it, it seemed like the dynamic contrasts were too big, but now that I'm listening to it here, I agree with you --- they should be bigger.
smalin 2 weeks ago
@smalin Too hot? Too cold? I think it's just right. I can feel the truth and emotion coming through the playing and it moves me. Beautifully done.
Samwiseo00o 2 weeks ago
Hi Smalin
I can't recall commenting on any of your videos...
I just wanted to thank you for your amazing work. When normal people get of work - Yours start!
I've been watching many of your vids - normally debussy and other artists i prefer....
Every now and then I'll watch a "random" video of yours. It is always breathtaking and like hearing your favourite song for the first time.
Please, please, please continue with your greatly appreciated work!
GrevMivlos 3 weeks ago
This interpretation marches forward like a habitual ghost. Stunning. Thank you for sharing!
RealoveGSR 3 weeks ago
This piece is always beautiful, but this interpretation stopped me in my tracks. I must have hit replay a dozen times now. Thank you.
nastyvet 3 weeks ago
Thank you. I love this interpretation.
omgzazu 3 weeks ago
Enjoyed this one for it's simplicity and haunting quality. Very nice.
buzzwaffle 3 weeks ago
I like Satie.
ApsisApocynthion 3 weeks ago
just magic, thank you Smalin!
facetubemyassplug 3 weeks ago
Please write me a coment and tell what this track stands for and what it expresses for YOU.
Thanks in advance :)
BraunerSenf 3 weeks ago
@BraunerSenf Is that a question to me?
smalin 3 weeks ago
@BraunerSenf
It's directed to every viewer but your statement would be exeedingly interesting of course!
BraunerSenf 3 weeks ago
@BraunerSenf Oh, good ... because I don't have an answer. For me, what is expressed in music does not translate well into words. (If it did, I wouldn't bother with music.)
smalin 3 weeks ago
I did a guitar version of Gymnopedie no1--one of my all time favorite pieces. But this... as much as I always love your visual accompaniments, with this one I closed my eyes and was simply moved. Thank you.
guitarpick8120 3 weeks ago
I loved it.
shamitri 3 weeks ago
PS: the tags are wrong! It's not a Gymnopedie...
Dnava28 3 weeks ago
@Dnava28 That was intentional; people looking for a Gymnopedie might want to see this.
smalin 3 weeks ago
Curious interpretation... why did you choose to play the acciaccature on the beat, slow and louder than the note?
Dnava28 3 weeks ago
@Dnava28 I don't think I can explain it in words. I've played this piece for decades, and this is where I've ended up (for now). It feels right. I know it's not the standard way.
smalin 3 weeks ago
Beautiful. Sombre, but beautiful.
rogerstill71 3 weeks ago
Well!... This is depressing...
AlmightyDuckBall 3 weeks ago
I've watched too many of your videos. Perhaps aided by the simplicity of this piece, I was able to read it like sheet music and play along while watching for the first time. Which was fun!
forscyvus 3 weeks ago
No barlines. Interesting.
C0urante 3 weeks ago
@C0urante Yeah, he stopped using barlines at some point. But it really doesn't matter; this piece is clearly in 4/4.
smalin 3 weeks ago
@smalin I agree that it feels like 4/4; however, to say it doesn't matter seems like a bit of an overstatement. Doesn't the piece seem to stretch on endlessly and without pause, like a horizontal axis? I don't see it as coincidence or mere personal fancy that led Satie to make his decision.
C0urante 3 weeks ago
@C0urante The rhythm is completely regular; whether you mark that regularity with barlines or not doesn't make much difference, IMO. There's lots of music written *with* barlines (by other composers) that also "seems to stretch on endlessly"; it's up to the player's discretion how to interpret the barlines. Satie left lots of things out of his scores, giving the explanation "for anyone who's musical, such indications are superfluous." This seems more like that kind of omission.
smalin 3 weeks ago
@C0urante Actually, I'll go further. Satie wrote many pieces that were very structured, that didn't at all seem "to stretch on endlessly," without barlines. So, I think it was just a habit (or, if you want to be less generous, an affectation --- he wasn't without affectation).
smalin 3 weeks ago
@smalin Thanks for correcting my ignorance, then! I appreciate it.
C0urante 3 weeks ago
@C0urante Sure, any time. There was a time in my life (starting in the mid-1970s) when I stopped using barlines in my compositions. Now, when I go back and work on those pieces, I put the barlines back in. It's easy to ignore a barline that's superfluous, but finding your place in a piece that's very complicated and has no barlines can sometimes be difficult. So, while I generally follow the rule "less is more," I think it's okay to err on the side of prolixity, too.
smalin 3 weeks ago
I can't listen to this interpretation, I guess I am close minded like that :P
philateliceun 3 weeks ago
@philateliceun yeah I agree, it defeats the purpose of the song to a certain extend. The high notes (at least in my view) show some optimism/ Hope contrasted by the sad and monotonous low notes, and it is that contrast that makes this piano piece -or even Satie's Gymnopedies- delightfully dark.
DrPidi 3 weeks ago
YES, my favourite...
Siggorillo 3 weeks ago
enjoying as allways
candypinkification 3 weeks ago
love your work
cangrejoni 3 weeks ago
Didn't enjoy the grace notes as appoggiaturas. Messes too much with the offbeat meter in the left hand, oddly feels like the simplicity is lost.
LIANG14 3 weeks ago
Love this tune.
MrFreddieBurgoyne 3 weeks ago
Are the grace notes usually played like that? Interesting take on a beautiful piece.
MidoriFan10 3 weeks ago
@MidoriFan10 They're usually played more like grace notes. But I took Satie's "Lent" indication more seriously.
smalin 3 weeks ago
do you ever get crazy high, Stephen?
ItsFizikal 3 weeks ago
@ItsFizikal
i doubt that he does... but it is a very amusing thought xD
BadgerDK 3 weeks ago
@ItsFizikal I haven't recently, but I did in my youth.
smalin 3 weeks ago
omfg amazing! thanks so much for this :)
PestVic 3 weeks ago
it's the first time I appreciate a computer interpretation ...
dieferri 3 weeks ago
@dieferri Computer interpretation? This is my performance ... am I a computer?
smalin 3 weeks ago
@smalin sorry ... those grace notes seemed computer generated ... very unusual interpretation
dieferri 3 weeks ago
@dieferri If you listen carefully, you'll hear that every grace note is a little different --- much less regular than any other feature of the performance.
smalin 3 weeks ago
Love this song...! So touching
Roxxy306 3 weeks ago
nice!!
affablegiraffable 3 weeks ago
Is it romantic time work? It is for me not easy to understand. Music lover from Taiwan.
maechel200 3 weeks ago
@maechel200 No, it's after the Romantic period. Satie was the same time as the Impressionists (like Debussy and Ravel), but he wasn't an impressionist himself (at least, most people don't think so). He was his own, unique thing ...
smalin 3 weeks ago
long grace notes. Interesting
ratzlp0li 3 weeks ago
Thanks
tototamuz 3 weeks ago
It seems like you doing this kind of work all 24 hours a day :-)
dmitrybachinsky 3 weeks ago
@dmitrybachinsky No ... I sleep and eat, too ...
smalin 3 weeks ago
Glorious.
JackofOneTrade567 3 weeks ago
love this!
drknjil 3 weeks ago
wonderful!!
MrAlexbradley 3 weeks ago
Thanks for the video!!Amazing!!
grunts0203 3 weeks ago