Added: 5 years ago
From: thechilla
Views: 51,883
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (93)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • i wish in the future we could make movies like avatar in real time cuz our graphics card JUST CAN DO THAT

  • 90% Hardware is same on pro and gaming card(GPU,circuits). But coded(drivers) in a different way. Just expanding range of products.. Thats the truth.!!

  • thi is so old lol.... Damn its just 3 years past and the are now more than 70% better.

  • @fergoway2go You can suck my donkey nut sacks you cunt, If you have ever played a game at 60fps its silky smooth, but going over that allows you to do numerous other things while also keeping the frame rate good ... cunt

  • so if i can see this will be a big boost in adobe after effect right?

  • Workstation cards works better on 3D modeling software, gaming cards like geforce or radeon doesnt perform that good on 3D Modeling software.

  • and the modeling cards dont perform that god at gaming

  • Who the fuck says anything over 60fps is not noticed!?? fuck you! ... the higher over 60 you go the smoother and more responsive your game becomes, its simple logic. You may not SEE the difference but you will FEEL it.

  • @googler69er you feal the difference... what your keyboard gives you a massage when you pas 60 fps? the human eye cant see past 60-75FPS and you cant feal something your looking at... 70FPS and 300FPS look the same

  • @googler69er

    agreed. Someone hasn't gamed on crt before i see ;)

  • The author of this video is illustrating the quality of viewport rendering which in 3d apps is predominantly down to the gpu. I honestly believe that if you where familiar with 3d apps and workstation graphics cards you would appreciate the comparison

  • haha, wow, and what redering software r u usin

  • @Luky1Jay: Tesla is not a conventional GPU. It's a GPGPU that can be stacked up and work in tandem with the CPU to help in rendering or calculating ridiculous amount of work (says: 12 hours rendering -> 30min, fluid dynamic, weather forecast, protein folding etc.)

    @ARUandre: do you have a clue about what you were talking. And I mean "do you have it", not that you think you have it

  • 8 tesla c1060 could run crysis on 150-300fps or more ^^

  • Thats stupid.

  • ur stupid so fk up, u know nothing

  • Yea! Lets run Crysis at 300fps...yea! It doesn't make a difference over 60. Again, thats stupid.

  • seriously mate, you need to get over yourself... you have two cars that indeed take up some ram and graphics... but you design a building with renderings and flora then come and post a video here.. fu%k your ebay sales mate... not everyone cares bout your display or ram...

  • it helped me sell it tho ;)

    by the way, i dont know if you are aware but gfx cards make no difference to renders. they only help with the display. This vid shows the difference between two cards - seems like your pissed off because your running on a 8meg voodoo card from back in '96. lol

  • Displays are based on the quality of the graphics card, yet the virtual memory is drained to obviously render the model. And if you are comparing two cards then why you talking of speed? When you shift a virtual model around like you did, you are taking on ram and not .. erm graphics? Even if I did have the voodoo card from 96 .. (seems to be an insult of some sort)... I would not make a video on it lol. Seriously mate, get over yourself...

  • i thought it was all based on magic and spells. not.

    the graphics card allows polygons to be rendered to your display, the higher the bandwith/triangles per second/memory speed/pipelines/core speed/instruction set etc etc the better the performance. why do you think people spend money in newer faster performing graphics cards instead of just buying more ram or increasing the virtual memory size? i'm way over myself but it seems like somebody is jealous lol!

  • LOL!

  • SUPERLOLZ!

  • dude wtf comapre it to an gtx 280 ore something, quadro are the "best" so compare it to a good video card

  • smart ass this video is almost 2 years ago and if im correct the gtx 280 just recently came out am i correct? shut the fux up nigga WHAT!

  • nigga what!!!

  • ya, you have no fuckin clue what you are talking about. This card isnt designed for gaming, its for autocad and workstation applications. But it would still rape any home pc video card from that year.

  • Your an idiot, this video is old. If he compared the new quadros with the new GTX280's, the quadro will rape it.

  • exactamundo!

  • Not really following nvidia, but arnt the quadros being replaced with the tesla, which rapes the quadro?

  • YOU CAN NOT COMPARE THOSE CARDS. A 7300GT is a LOW LOW LOW end card. Its not even a BUDGET gaming card its lower than that. Compare it to AT LEAST a 7600gt preferable 7900GT

  • well i did compare it. LOL

  • @thechilla

    I have to say, always a pet peeve of mine to hear people bring out the old apples and oranges tripe. You can compare anything to anything...perhaps not brilliantly but it's done. Pretty good video, I didn't see much difference until you turned off the shadows with the Quadro and then it was noticeably much smoother. As you said...that's brilliant!

  • @unstable112

    I kinda agree, Quadro FX supports hardware openGL, and the 7300GT is a gaming card which doesn't. Which means that any 3D CAD or other 3D program that is running on a pc that doesn't have a 3d graphics card with OpenGL support, forces it's OpenGL to be run through software. And that's why everything slows down heavily ...

  • @AOTrans

    The 7300GT isnt even a gaming card. its just for simple browsing and watching some movies (not full hd because it cant handle that)

    So the comparisson is really out of proportions.

  • @unstable112 I dont disagree with you at all. It is quite out of proportion since one card is rubbish and the other is (was) pretty good and both are aimed at different markets. But sometimes people do like to see what the real differences are, even though its obvious, its good to see. :)

  • You're 100% a noob...

    The Quadro FX4400 is 512MB and the 7300GT is 256MB.

    What do u want dude?:S

  • lol.. have you even read the info or watched the vid??

  • where did you said that we can download the cars? Google? house=???

  • just google 'sketchup warehouse' and you'll find it :)

  • Lol do you you're the noob, you know the difference between the cards?

    Lets forget the memory, the Quadro cards are aimed at professional development like 3D modeling, animation, rendering. Of course it will beat the Geforce cards in development tasks. However the Geforce cards were aimed at gaming not development so therefor they will perform "shit" in development situations! Do some research before you start criticizing people and don't you try and tell me that I'm wrong.

  • And thats exactly why you get people ranting on forums "Just spent 2 grand on a graphics card and crysis runs at 1FPS!!!"

  • LOL it will works PERFECTLY on my Nvidia tesla 1070...

  • Also will it works better on gtx 280?

  • yes probably..

  • Well that really depends, if your trying to compare the GTX 280 to most Quadro cards in Dev. Situation the Quadro's will beat the GTX. However if your comparing in a gaming situation, say playing "Crysis" the GTX will max out on frame per second but the Quadro's like the 4400 will only probably max out at 13 fps.

  • I like to know can you use the nvidia quadro cards to do 3d rendering on maya and studio max?

  • it cant be done yet, maybe in the next version of max or maya they might. Adobe photoshop CS4 uses the GPU and multiple CPU's to redraw and speed up photoshop! so max and maya should be able to in the future!

  • But this may be kind of biased because the RAM, CPU, and rest of the system should be the same for fair results.

  • just use 9800gtx sli cards you wont have any problems at all

  • One has a Pentium 4 @ 3GHz and the other has a Xeon at who knows what! Of course the 4400 is going to look better!

  • that would seem to be correct, but even with the quadro in the slower system it still whips the 7300GT's ass

  • But what about a 7600GT they both cost about the same right now... =P

  • lol no idea.. i recon the quadro would still beat it. I'm using a quad core mac pro now with an ati 1900xt. Its not as good as the quadro for 3D apps like Cinema 4D, but for games the 1900xt is better. :P

  • @wootness3000

    Good catch.

  • @wootness3000 great point man, .... of course the CPU is responsible for 3D Viewport rendering ! ... everybody knows that

  • @pestana01 It's responsible for bottle-necking, yes. Genius.

  • The comparison is irrelevant. Quadro FX4400 uses a NV45 core, much more powerful than the entry line G73 on the 7300 GT.

    That, besides the fact that the 512MB frame buffer is probably what makes the Quadro run better.

  • talk about stating the obvious..! this video shows the difference between the two cards and shows it very well.

  • is the price same?

  • is this quadro supposed to be good? cause i always knew the 7300gt was bad

  • my cousin is having nvidia quadro fx 5500 (1gb) ,a game developer....anything u play on it,the framerate never goes below 150

  • prash... your an idiot... Quadros are horrible for gaming, they're only meant for 3D-development and rendering.

  • u never played on that,thats y ur saying like this...........

  • I have, I used a FX3700. It was excellent at creating and editing but when I tried to play Crysis it failed miserabley on medium, only ~12FPS.

  • but i played on fx5500 buddy at alll high,it was incredible !!!!!!

  • Ok,Quadros still suck compared to main stream cards. 8800GTS 512MB can be soft modded into a FX-3700.

  • i agree wid u,but ATI 3870x2 is also great.....

  • woot your the actual idiot. the fx 5500 is better than most 8800 gtx. Fx 5600 even rivals with 8800 ultra with some applications and a few games. Although the 8800 ultras are specialized for games, fx 5600 and 4600 can handle games like a piece of cake. I myself have an sli configuration with 8800 ultras (xps 720) and one with fx 5600's (precision 690). The 690 runs crysis a bit better and scores higher on 3dmark06 because of its 2 quad cores at 3.2 ghz. The 720 is faster only when I oc at max.

  • Look up spec sheets you @**. 5600 is OK but compared to MAINSTREAM GRAPHICS CARDS THE PRICE TO PERFORMANCE IS SUCKY!

  • Hey rendering is cpu the inner face is for gpu a quad core cpu or 8 for that matter will help with the rendering in 3d apps and 2d apps

  • Quadro is for 3D Graphic design(expert level)and its real time renderer espicially in the Viewport in graphic programs like 3DMAX and MAYA,& its full supported with this programs and work with D3D and OpenGL.

    while GeForce is for Games and its driver is not supported with all graphic design progams ( and do not support D3D ( direct 3D) maybe the last series yes!

  • whua? the 4400 is better then 7300?

  • dude thats a 2000$ card it a different series not the same 1 its made for workstaions and buisnesses not gamin

  • Have you guys seen the Quadro FX 5600? It costs like, $3000, it came out a while ago, and it's still way ahead of the consumer market. Pixar and them probably use something similar to it.

  • And my 8800gt owns ur lil 8600GT.

    xx

  • Lol my 8600GT owns that old quadro, but ya i dunno. I do 3D stuff, and quadros rnt needed unless ur like doing insane stuff for movies.

  • sorry where did you get the start bar of the 1st computer?

    thnx

  • wow .. lol

  • hi , yeah because FX series are desinged for that king of programs and the other are desinged

    for games...try that FX on BF2 and try the 7300GT

  • i have 7300gt 512mb vers, plays most of the games like bioshock, cod4 to med-high.

  • I run a Quadro FX4000 256MB DDR2 AGP8x and it handles SketchUp Pro 6 with ease... it's quality you notice mostly and also in games the filtering and pixel accuracy just blows gaming cards away but for the frame rates which are though still very reasonable.

  • I also have an 7300GT nd I can rotateevery 3d model with shadows and everything on and it works smothly, even games like Half-Life 2, Bioshock, CoD2 and CoD4 (Demo) and I tested my graphic card with 3ds max also and it rendered the animation in 3 sec

  • yeah something is wrong with his setup, im getting the 512mb version

  • what the fuck,it shows that quadro fx4400 is a processor?

  • Quaddro is for that very purpose.

  • Quadro's are insanely powerful, but incredibly expensive. If you tweak them you can get them to work with games, but that is overkill to the max.

  • what??? you cant use quadro FX's for gaming. im getting a mobo with 4 PCI-express slots, what should i get for NVIDIA GPU's. i have an BFG 8800 gtx right now, but it sucks ass for rendering. any help guys on some cool GPU's for gaming and rendering?

  • yes, you can use them for gaming.

  • K, but is it any good for gaming. I want to buy 2 quadro FX 5600. im both a 3d artist and a gamer..

  • graphics cards won't help you for rendering(except you use gelato but it sucks), if you want your visualization faster then just one fx 5600 is enough. for rendering i recommend a core 2 quad

  • hi thanks for uploading this i'm a sketchup user and i definetly need to know what kind GPU do i need to run Sketchup smoothly without buying a MAC...BTW how much RAM did you have

  • hi. I had 2gigs on each machine. Sketchup or any other 3d app requires a nice gpu - the nvidia Quadro's are the nuts, but even a high end gaming card would be ok. BUT a high end gaming card wont beat a quadro card wen it comes to 3d software.

  • umm i will not pay the difference for me to buy a quadro ill first buy the 8800 ultra

  • yup, professional video card better than consumer video card at renderin'

  • OR AND HOW DO YOU RECORD ON SKETCUP

  • cheers very helpfull.....do you use sketchup or another program becasue your designs are great....

    Is it hard in uni lol(i might be anoyying now ..)..plz reply....Ps you are great

  • Thank you for that "thechilla": Can i ask you some qustions ....how long do you have to go to collogue/uni?....what subjects/pathways do you need in school to be an architect???? plz reply ...thanks tomo

  • hi tomo, well to become an architect its 7 years at Uni (im at leeds) doing architecture. that consists of a 3year degree course, 1years work, 2years of a graduate degree, and another years work - then you sit exams and your an architect!

    At school, it would be good to do maths, maybe physics and possibly art or something like that - DT, Graphics or other related subjects are also fine. I had Alevels in Maths Physics Computing, but a very good Graphic Design portoflio from GCSE :)

  • is it like everyone who sits for the exam will pass and be a qualified architect?

    im fan archi student from malaysia and currently working for a British architect.

    overhere not everyone who sits for the exam will pass. some people take years to pass. they have quotas.

  • The quadro card must have cost a lot. Oh yeah, GET A MAC!!!

  • thanks! the uploaded video is a bit out of sync, audio before video - but not by a considerable amount.

  • nice n0oBi5h camera work.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more