I did not like the fact that they were rushing the test... 1/2 inch clearance and 1,2,3 put the jacks/stands back on in a rush... too pricey as well. Sorry guys but show more confidence in your product which I am sure is a good one.
After you do a test like that, can that same wing be used on a aircraft, or is it pushed to the limit and be considered over stressed? because I have a design for a wing that I would like to build for myself, I love fiberglass and foam!
@datzfast These are the same static load testing methods that were used in the FAA Certification of our TOP CUB. The TOP CUB is certified in the Standard Category - FAR 23, Amendment 55. - The only difference is this wing is being tested to 1,865 lb. gross weight whereas the TOP CUB was tested to 2,300 lbs.
@CubCrafters Nice. I wonder how different is it using a simulated rig like this as compared to a static (full) airframe for testing purposes. I'm sure a lot of us here would have seen the footage from the B772 certification trials.
Would simple static load tests like these contribute to FAA certification requirements?
@9VARZ Yes. These are the same static load testing methods that were used in the FAA Certification of our TOP CUB. The TOP CUB is certified in the Standard Category - FAR 23, Amendment 55.
Ya and the price their asking for these things now you think the carbon was converted to diamond. They are all hooting and howling there way to the bank with your money.
if you think there's someone out there making loads of money on airplanes, you're smoking crack. These guys put out a quality product, and make enough profit to be a reasonable venture, unlike some of the other jokers selling "kits" - basically a box of parts and a pat on the butt for support.
Muito bom, estou diminuindo bem lentamente a minha ignorância sobre o tema.
Obrigado a todos
MrBenmel 3 months ago
I did not like the fact that they were rushing the test... 1/2 inch clearance and 1,2,3 put the jacks/stands back on in a rush... too pricey as well. Sorry guys but show more confidence in your product which I am sure is a good one.
camilossales 6 months ago
After you do a test like that, can that same wing be used on a aircraft, or is it pushed to the limit and be considered over stressed? because I have a design for a wing that I would like to build for myself, I love fiberglass and foam!
indianchief741 1 year ago
whats the margin of safty is it FFA decided or factory decided
datzfast 1 year ago
@datzfast These are the same static load testing methods that were used in the FAA Certification of our TOP CUB. The TOP CUB is certified in the Standard Category - FAR 23, Amendment 55. - The only difference is this wing is being tested to 1,865 lb. gross weight whereas the TOP CUB was tested to 2,300 lbs.
CubCrafters 1 year ago
What aircraft is this?
9VARZ 1 year ago
@9VARZ It is the wing used in the Carbon Cub EX and the Carbon Cub SS.
CubCrafters 1 year ago
@CubCrafters Nice. I wonder how different is it using a simulated rig like this as compared to a static (full) airframe for testing purposes. I'm sure a lot of us here would have seen the footage from the B772 certification trials.
Would simple static load tests like these contribute to FAA certification requirements?
9VARZ 1 year ago
@9VARZ Yes. These are the same static load testing methods that were used in the FAA Certification of our TOP CUB. The TOP CUB is certified in the Standard Category - FAR 23, Amendment 55.
CubCrafters 1 year ago
Is that it ? I thought this was supposed to be a UTS test ? Piper and Cessna would have tested the wing to breaking point.
AussieAviator 2 years ago
they will test a few to destruction but they test all to a set load to make sure that it is airworthy
wizardrincewind9 1 year ago
Clyde Cessna would have loaded that sucker till it broke or touched the floor.
backfyre1 2 years ago
Ya and the price their asking for these things now you think the carbon was converted to diamond. They are all hooting and howling there way to the bank with your money.
ismasamov55 2 years ago
if you think there's someone out there making loads of money on airplanes, you're smoking crack. These guys put out a quality product, and make enough profit to be a reasonable venture, unlike some of the other jokers selling "kits" - basically a box of parts and a pat on the butt for support.
barorg 2 years ago 5
@barorg -- What you mean aviation products are not a license to print money. I thought it was... ;-)
R1Kyle 1 year ago
cool, interesting to know. Are those just sand bags?
addusernamehere 3 years ago
They are bags of lead pellets ranging in weight from 1 - 25 lbs each. (most are 25 lbs)
CubCrafters 3 years ago
Info
nico0924 3 years ago