How I Solve the Last 2 Centers on the 6x6

[Bradmasta1]

lol I solve the 6x6 differently from probably most people. It takes me awhile but ehh I don't mind. I solve one face, then bottom corners, then bottom edges, the rest of the edge, and theeeen all the faces. and when I solve the faces I make groups of 3 and use an algorithm to place them where they need to go.

[LuKaS2oo9]

Just needed the alg to swap the last 2 pieces... Also useful on the 5x5, the rest i did intuitively. Thanks!

[C53H]

2:10 the white says "if" xD

[pivoterkiller]

yay.. first time solved whole 6x6. i know how to solve 2x2, 3x3, 4x4, 5x5 and now 6x6.

Ill get 7x7 for sure in few months

but i just cant get to solve 1x1.. please make tutorial about it. its too hard... all the algorithms...

[10609]

omg! so smoth

[EMI94100]

wow, thanks. I think, I will buy one, cant wait 6b.

[akiramejin]

what if on your two outer bars, you don't have the two inner pieces? do you just use two commutators instead?

[ludozebig]

I'mcfrench and I don't understand very well but I can't finich the 2 last centers of the 7x7x7...Could you help me with a video?

[Tok169]

Really helpful. Thanks Chris! Make more tutorials!

[alyg66]

i have no idea what was happening but it was cool to watch...

[KireinaCAT]

nonono

for your second bar you couldve just done Rw U2 Rw'

[monkeydude1313]

Im not perfect =p

[KireinaCAT]

*stare*

~really?

lol kay

[Cerb1987]

first bar I would suggest making U 3Rw U' 3Rw'

for the second in your situation a simpel 2Rw U2 2Rw' would work quite well =)

But I would use inner bar, outer, inner, outer, it can save you a commutator

Also second example U2 3Lw' U' 3Lw

Hope this helps you, since I try to avoid slice moves as long as I can to get more speed into it.

[bertettojay]

at least you would think it was intuitive and easy to understand...but not when working with people in my school...they are incredibly dumb.

[Square1Boy]

can you make an edge pairing tutorial with the method u use even though its probably similar to everyone elses pls?

[speedy198524]

my biggest cube was a 5x5, but my 7x7 just came in the mail yesterday, i've already solved it a few times but no real method, just intuetive that takes forever. lol. i think this video will acually help me quite a bit. :)

[SnowedTiger]

So I guess you don't have a 4^3 ? :O That's bad.

[speedy198524]

4^3?? whats that? i have several 3x3s and 4x4s and the golden egg and all sorts of cubes, rather large collection. i dont know what ur asking

[SnowedTiger]

I meant 4x4x4. Sorry :)

[speedy198524]

lol. yeah i got one, its just a rubiks brand but its great. but i originally said my biggest was 5x5... lol.

[esquimalt1]

haha i get what you meant 4^3=4x4x4 ;)

[SnowedTiger]

That's it :D

[TheAccidentalFreak]

there is 4x3's

3x3x4

[speedy198524]

lol. is it just me or can anyone else see that 5 is still a larger number than 3 or 4. i have a 3x3x4, cool cube, i love solving it, but not as big... note... not as many cubies as the 5x5. lol.

[comownage]

woah I never knew I solved the 6x6 like you :O :P

[VinitheVcubeVIP]

Thats a really smart idea. I never thought to solve it that way!

[LNOL]

You should to inner, outer, inner outer. It allows for a better first inner bar. You on'y have to use the "happy fun-time algorithm (which is faster if you use cutex's algorithm instead)" for the last outer bar.

[iasimp1997]

dude you are beast at 6x6

[agent866]

ur not a master either ? dude ur awesome at the 6 by 6 really fast ur a pro man love all r vids keep it up

[LNOL]

I have not seen a master cuber who makes lots of cubing videos. Chris is pretty much as close as it gets, though.

[agent866]

he's close to be the master at 6 by 6 tho

[RanzhaTheLoneVlogger]

To solve it, a T-perm would be used as if on 3x3. Therefore, it's not a legitimate parity case considering it can be solved as if it had edges.

[DJVL0GS]

Awesome..Thanks for sharing!!!!

[thebackflipmaster]

have you seen Lance's commutators for big cubes? you should watch it. its way easier than making the center line by line

[vifs]

this is closes to how i solve last two sides on 6x6

[Hippievwbus94]

omg,.. you can do everything so much easier... lool

[xXHappyxBlueXx]

the 2nd bar you could've just done: do R and L' on the 2nd inner layers and you got a bar like that. O_o

[vbvbig]

does the 6x6 have parotiy cases like the 4x4? i'm considering getting one..

[chamachinga20]

yes it does

[origami1325]

@vbvbig yes the 6x6 gets all 4x4 paritys

[6midlan]

Yes. All even layered cubes have parity errors when you solve it like a 3x3. So 2x2, 4x4, 6x6, 8x8, etc...

[RanzhaTheLoneVlogger]

2x2 has no parity because it has no edges to have it on.

[theWestonian]

2x2 does not.

Since parity is a description of the relation of the corners to the edges, there cant be any parity.

[esquimalt1]

Then 3x3 T perm is parity. :D

[LNOL]

Yes, yes it is.

[theWestonian]

Indeed it is!

but its not a parity error

This is all according to dan harris's book

lol

[Slipppppers]

For the case in 2:36, I would've just done 2R U2 2R', because you already have the two inner pieces connected.

And then for the case in 2:58, I would've done 2L' U 2L, because then you would have two complete bars, instead of just one.

[georgewig]

is this one of the modded cubes

[UKSpeedCuber]

Yes.

[Greeneyeskater93]

do an advanced edges tut kinda vid...pllllzzzzz

[tapio2003]

Your algorith to case where in last bar there is missing one of center one is awesome. my way to solve it was much slower . Thanks

[idpapro]

at 2:33 you can just do an Rw U2 Rw' to solve the center bar

[egonAges]

what do you mean?

[goshypimple13]

that helped alot

thanks!

[fazrulz1]

Chris, I noticed in your solving video that when you make an inner 1x1x4 row, you insert it with 3Rw Rw' U2 Rw 3Rw'. What i mean is you can just do 3Rw U2 3Rw'. This is faster, cos you can just use the whole 3 layers to insert the bar, instead of worrying about messing other parts up, cos you won't.

[monkeydude1313]

While doing the last 2 centers there may be a case with the outer 2 bars that I want to keep on the front side (most obvious example is all solved) so only turning the innermost slice allows me to keep those cases that I like intact.

However I do usually do what you suggested.

[fazrulz1]

sweet

[wikinick257]

5th

[esquimalt1]

4th

[zster007]

happy lil fun time

[SpeedStackingManiac4]

835923486092348692840582394th comment