We live with lots of theories. We have theories on light waves,how the brain works,gravity etc. Theory isn't a bad word-it just means we don't have all the answers on a subject yet and its a theory until we work out the complete process.
can somebody tell me where those photos of the dead one are from?
reading arguments about patty is a lot of fun. its my new hobby.
for the record, i would say i was about sixty/forty percent in favour of thinking sasquatch or real, but that is totally a dude in a suit...during all the discussions of thigh width and arm length and gate and perspective, how come nobody ever points out that you can see a great big rectangular eyehole on the face with two human eyes sticking out?
It's called the Yeti of Bergeonouf (sp?). PostToastie has onaother video about it with the entire story on his page. PostToastie has some great videos,one of the better channels on this site IMHO.
you know if you think of it what if this animal is real, what if there extremely intellegent its why we can never find it, it knows how to escape, but what if we could teach them how to speak and how to operate in society !
Oh Lord, Joey, on that Steven Hawking's wife comment, you have got to check out the video called "making fun of the wheelchair genius" in my favorites. Save it for when you're in a bad mood, you'll pee yourself laughing.
Under scrict scientific scrutiny, the bulge on the leg was determined to be a torn quadraceps muscle. Therefore "Patty" had an awkward gate. This evidence was shown to be overlooked throughout the years and opinions already formed are hard to change. I believe most footprints and vids and photos are hoaxes but as a man of science I believe the "creature" in the Patterson/Gimlin film is the real thing. That is a real Sasquatch.
With a torn quadraceps muscle, the creature would've had more than an awkward gate. It likely would've been able to take only a few, slow steps at a time (if at all).
Not true I have many athletes with partially torn quads,hamstrings, biceps etcs etc. Once it heals it is still functional unless it is a total rupture.
Skeptics and many advocates agree that ultimately a specimen will have to be taken to prove the existence of Sasquatches. A similar standard should be upheld for those who claim to be "the guy in the suit". Where's the suit? No one has produced an ape suit that shows the same muscle detail, or even resembles the subject of the P/G film. The length of the forearm alone is enough to call the idea into question.
In this day and age when forensic science has reaches a point where we can determine with absolute certainty whether someone was at a crime scene, or whether images have been digitally enhanced, or faked, it never ceases to amaze me when I see that people are still rejecting the P/G footage. Not ONE person has offered more than ill-informed, or uneducated opinions against it.
its interesting to know that john chambers, the man behind the apes in planet of the apes, was "blamed" for this hoax. while he denied it up until his death, i think it is just as interesting to know that the apes in the 'planet' movies were head, hand and sometimes leg pieces... no full body suits.
I never understood why people always mention how advanced the POTA movies were...you are right. They feature hand makeup and face prosthetics...where are the full body suit? In Beneath the POTA we see James Gregory and Maurice Evans (Ursus and Zaius) in a sauna scene, with only towels on...the suits are big, bulky, and very typical of ape suits of the time. Check it!
I,m not convinced this stuff is legit but I'm not buying the explanation that Wallaces wife was in that suit. Was she like 7 ft tall? She must be a big lady.
I can't believe you take the lies that Ray Wallace's family is feeding you, If you would do some real research, yourself, you would find that Ray always said the prints he found were real. He and/or his family never had anything to do with the Patterson Footage, his family claimed the prints he found were fake so that people would quit bugging them about it.
I read where his family said he never claimed it was his wife because he was astonished at how his hoax took off, and was afraid of what would happen if he admitted it....
hellotimetogo, these videos on YouTube are compressed; and I have yet to see one that matched the 2nd generation copy that Rene Dahinden showed a group of ~30 that I was part of. (He owned the original at the time)
Ray Wallace had nothing whatsoever to do with the Patterson/Gimlin film. Ray was involved in the footprint finds that occurred, some 10 years previous to the P/G film's shooting, which let to the coining of the name "bigfoot" (or "Big Foot", as it originally appeared). Wallace's footprints and the P/G film occurred in fairly close geographic proximity to one another - that is the only connection.
It looked at them to see if Roger Patterson and Gimlin were going to follow her. Look at the knees, look at the shoulder blades, and watch how it turns his whole body instead of its head.
I hate to be the devil's advocate, but if it were a costume then the person inside wouldn't necessarily be able to turn his head like he would normally without a big cumbersome suit. That said, i'm still intrigued by the images-i really don't know what to make of it. Hopefully scientists will be able to say definitively that it is a suit or not, thus, putting an end to the mystery.
not really, not when you look at how few wild habitats are still viable in the US. The wolf has been pressed into being non-existant within the United States, and the Grizzly is soon to disappear too, there is simply not enough room for something this large.
From Wikipedia: 'The highest levels of protection as described by the IUCN, the international conservation agency, are Level I (Wilderness areas) and Level II (National Parks). The United States maintains 12% of Level I and II lands in the world. These lands had a total area of 210,000 square miles.
I liked this. It was a serious approach to the anatomy of the animal, even before it is discovered.
CyFiM 1 year ago
@CyFiM They exist. Not everyone has seen one. We know microparticles exist but not everyone has, or will ever see them.
Funboy870 2 weeks ago
@Funboy870 Um... I think you replied to the wrong comment.
CyFiM 2 weeks ago
Narrated by Stephen Hawking's wife.
i'm going to hell
tphart88 1 year ago
We live with lots of theories. We have theories on light waves,how the brain works,gravity etc. Theory isn't a bad word-it just means we don't have all the answers on a subject yet and its a theory until we work out the complete process.
seymourbbest 1 year ago
@seymourbbest
gravity isn't a theory its a fact.
snitchsgetstitchs107 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
[Evolutionary THEORY as science = license to steal]
LovingKimiKatkar 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
c´mon...
jaimebastos 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
bigfoot lives
xDARREN1985x 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
how do you get that voice? were you a smoker? that's a voice box right? This is creepy as hell btw
rdeco73 3 years ago
Get a Mac, they talk.
PostToastie 3 years ago
it has tits
dicidec 3 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
Yes which is why there are so many Bigfoot researchers who are fixated on The Patterson footage (bunch of pervs).
cha5 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Bad joke people, Don't take it seriously.
cha5 3 years ago
I thought it was funny, I have yet to meet a man who doesn't like tata's, God bless them.
thegirl44 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
can somebody tell me where those photos of the dead one are from?
reading arguments about patty is a lot of fun. its my new hobby.
for the record, i would say i was about sixty/forty percent in favour of thinking sasquatch or real, but that is totally a dude in a suit...during all the discussions of thigh width and arm length and gate and perspective, how come nobody ever points out that you can see a great big rectangular eyehole on the face with two human eyes sticking out?
reltonpelton 3 years ago
It's called the Yeti of Bergeonouf (sp?). PostToastie has onaother video about it with the entire story on his page. PostToastie has some great videos,one of the better channels on this site IMHO.
thegirl44 3 years ago
you know if you think of it what if this animal is real, what if there extremely intellegent its why we can never find it, it knows how to escape, but what if we could teach them how to speak and how to operate in society !
CORYBOO800 3 years ago
For your information mbw5 its spelt "gait"...Not "Gate". You inspiring "genius" you!!
Exciter1000 3 years ago
hey Exciter...check the "Bigfoot in a James Bond movie" clip...what is that??
joeyvader 3 years ago
I think the robotic voice is courtesy of Apple voice-simulation software.
mbw5 3 years ago
what is up with the voice?
video5guy 4 years ago 2
It's Steven Hawkings wife...
joeyvader 3 years ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
Oh Lord, Joey, on that Steven Hawking's wife comment, you have got to check out the video called "making fun of the wheelchair genius" in my favorites. Save it for when you're in a bad mood, you'll pee yourself laughing.
thegirl44 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I do an amazing impression of Hawking telling a hooker what he wants...second only to my Stallone...and my Governor Arnold...
joeyvader 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ROFL, That's my joey, the boy's not well, God bless him :).
thegirl44 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
That's true! I spent half of Halloween night in a Creature from the Black Lagoon outfit...shoulda remebered to put in a pee flap...not fun...
joeyvader 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
gotta remember how to spell remember too...
joeyvader 3 years ago
Under scrict scientific scrutiny, the bulge on the leg was determined to be a torn quadraceps muscle. Therefore "Patty" had an awkward gate. This evidence was shown to be overlooked throughout the years and opinions already formed are hard to change. I believe most footprints and vids and photos are hoaxes but as a man of science I believe the "creature" in the Patterson/Gimlin film is the real thing. That is a real Sasquatch.
rdeco73 4 years ago 2
With a torn quadraceps muscle, the creature would've had more than an awkward gate. It likely would've been able to take only a few, slow steps at a time (if at all).
mbw5 3 years ago
Not true I have many athletes with partially torn quads,hamstrings, biceps etcs etc. Once it heals it is still functional unless it is a total rupture.
phatdaddi314 3 years ago
Monster Quest already found DNA from one of its episode
vangsta206 4 years ago 3
Skeptics and many advocates agree that ultimately a specimen will have to be taken to prove the existence of Sasquatches. A similar standard should be upheld for those who claim to be "the guy in the suit". Where's the suit? No one has produced an ape suit that shows the same muscle detail, or even resembles the subject of the P/G film. The length of the forearm alone is enough to call the idea into question.
ohmah2001 4 years ago 3
In this day and age when forensic science has reaches a point where we can determine with absolute certainty whether someone was at a crime scene, or whether images have been digitally enhanced, or faked, it never ceases to amaze me when I see that people are still rejecting the P/G footage. Not ONE person has offered more than ill-informed, or uneducated opinions against it.
MickPsyphon 4 years ago 9
AGREED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ffs we have scientific technology, and we still can't prove its fake...
Hightemplarl 4 years ago 3
its interesting to know that john chambers, the man behind the apes in planet of the apes, was "blamed" for this hoax. while he denied it up until his death, i think it is just as interesting to know that the apes in the 'planet' movies were head, hand and sometimes leg pieces... no full body suits.
blablaproductions 4 years ago
I never understood why people always mention how advanced the POTA movies were...you are right. They feature hand makeup and face prosthetics...where are the full body suit? In Beneath the POTA we see James Gregory and Maurice Evans (Ursus and Zaius) in a sauna scene, with only towels on...the suits are big, bulky, and very typical of ape suits of the time. Check it!
joeyvader 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
thisscks
gerrycurren 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I,m not convinced this stuff is legit but I'm not buying the explanation that Wallaces wife was in that suit. Was she like 7 ft tall? She must be a big lady.
keithpas 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
She played college ball and coached for a while in the WNBA. You should see her feet man!!! :)
hellotimetogo 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I bet she kept old man Wallace in line with those feet. Kick his ass to the curb if he does'nt behave!!
keithpas 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
LMAO.
hellotimetogo 4 years ago
I can't believe you take the lies that Ray Wallace's family is feeding you, If you would do some real research, yourself, you would find that Ray always said the prints he found were real. He and/or his family never had anything to do with the Patterson Footage, his family claimed the prints he found were fake so that people would quit bugging them about it.
PostToastie 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I read where his family said he never claimed it was his wife because he was astonished at how his hoax took off, and was afraid of what would happen if he admitted it....
Look, all I see is a person in a hot fur costume.
hellotimetogo 4 years ago
hellotimetogo, these videos on YouTube are compressed; and I have yet to see one that matched the 2nd generation copy that Rene Dahinden showed a group of ~30 that I was part of. (He owned the original at the time)
It's definitely NOT a person in a suit.
MickPsyphon 4 years ago 3
Ray Wallace had nothing whatsoever to do with the Patterson/Gimlin film. Ray was involved in the footprint finds that occurred, some 10 years previous to the P/G film's shooting, which let to the coining of the name "bigfoot" (or "Big Foot", as it originally appeared). Wallace's footprints and the P/G film occurred in fairly close geographic proximity to one another - that is the only connection.
ohmah2001 4 years ago 2
its real
ted1934 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
it looks at the fucking camera its fake
fuckinidots 4 years ago
It looked at them to see if Roger Patterson and Gimlin were going to follow her. Look at the knees, look at the shoulder blades, and watch how it turns his whole body instead of its head.
LastSunrise1981 4 years ago
I hate to be the devil's advocate, but if it were a costume then the person inside wouldn't necessarily be able to turn his head like he would normally without a big cumbersome suit. That said, i'm still intrigued by the images-i really don't know what to make of it. Hopefully scientists will be able to say definitively that it is a suit or not, thus, putting an end to the mystery.
cspce 3 years ago
scientist have no brains, they want to live on mars cause they think asteroid is going to destroy earth. trust me freind, this vid is real
godzillaislarge 3 years ago
what about the swinging boobies?
SweetGypsyTears 4 years ago
Also, the Hippopotomous was thought to be a hoax because of its tiny legs and huge body.
EvanMonster 4 years ago
Well, there you go.
komodoman 4 years ago
And the West didn't know about the giant Panda bear until 1869, people need to thing about this, plenty of space for US Bigfoots to hide in, PLENTY.
komodoman 4 years ago
wow i never knew that
jctheblomb 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
not really, not when you look at how few wild habitats are still viable in the US. The wolf has been pressed into being non-existant within the United States, and the Grizzly is soon to disappear too, there is simply not enough room for something this large.
RabbitRedshift 4 years ago
From Wikipedia: 'The highest levels of protection as described by the IUCN, the international conservation agency, are Level I (Wilderness areas) and Level II (National Parks). The United States maintains 12% of Level I and II lands in the world. These lands had a total area of 210,000 square miles.
PostToastie 4 years ago
Rabbit you also have to remember that Alaska is also part of the USA.
DerKannibale 4 years ago
And don't forget, there are probably many more bigfoot in Canada than in the USA.
PostToastie 4 years ago
that is not exactly true. the main reason is due to hunting them wolves, mt lions, etc...down to protect livestock!
teufelkeck 4 years ago
I want to beleve, remember that the gorillas were considered a myth until 1830´s something.
oravattnet 4 years ago
Thats Microsoft Michelle (windows voice)
connorw123 4 years ago
Apple Victoria
PostToastie 4 years ago