Added: 5 years ago
From: PostToastie
Views: 24,728
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (62)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I liked this. It was a serious approach to the anatomy of the animal, even before it is discovered.

  • @CyFiM They exist. Not everyone has seen one. We know microparticles exist but not everyone has, or will ever see them.

  • @Funboy870 Um... I think you replied to the wrong comment.

  • Narrated by Stephen Hawking's wife.

    i'm going to hell

  • We live with lots of theories. We have theories on light waves,how the brain works,gravity etc. Theory isn't a bad word-it just means we don't have all the answers on a subject yet and its a theory until we work out the complete process.

  • @seymourbbest

    gravity isn't a theory its a fact.

  • Get a Mac, they talk.

  • it has tits

  • I thought it was funny, I have yet to meet a man who doesn't like tata's, God bless them.

  • It's called the Yeti of Bergeonouf (sp?). PostToastie has onaother video about it with the entire story on his page. PostToastie has some great videos,one of the better channels on this site IMHO.

  • you know if you think of it what if this animal is real, what if there extremely intellegent its why we can never find it, it knows how to escape, but what if we could teach them how to speak and how to operate in society !

  • For your information mbw5 its spelt "gait"...Not "Gate". You inspiring "genius" you!!

  • hey Exciter...check the "Bigfoot in a James Bond movie" clip...what is that??

  • I think the robotic voice is courtesy of Apple voice-simulation software.

  • what is up with the voice?

  • It's Steven Hawkings wife...

  • Under scrict scientific scrutiny, the bulge on the leg was determined to be a torn quadraceps muscle. Therefore "Patty" had an awkward gate. This evidence was shown to be overlooked throughout the years and opinions already formed are hard to change. I believe most footprints and vids and photos are hoaxes but as a man of science I believe the "creature" in the Patterson/Gimlin film is the real thing. That is a real Sasquatch.

  • With a torn quadraceps muscle, the creature would've had more than an awkward gate. It likely would've been able to take only a few, slow steps at a time (if at all).

  • Not true I have many athletes with partially torn quads,hamstrings, biceps etcs etc. Once it heals it is still functional unless it is a total rupture.

  • Monster Quest already found DNA from one of its episode

  • Skeptics and many advocates agree that ultimately a specimen will have to be taken to prove the existence of Sasquatches. A similar standard should be upheld for those who claim to be "the guy in the suit". Where's the suit? No one has produced an ape suit that shows the same muscle detail, or even resembles the subject of the P/G film. The length of the forearm alone is enough to call the idea into question.

  • In this day and age when forensic science has reaches a point where we can determine with absolute certainty whether someone was at a crime scene, or whether images have been digitally enhanced, or faked, it never ceases to amaze me when I see that people are still rejecting the P/G footage. Not ONE person has offered more than ill-informed, or uneducated opinions against it.

  • AGREED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ffs we have scientific technology, and we still can't prove its fake...

  • its interesting to know that john chambers, the man behind the apes in planet of the apes, was "blamed" for this hoax. while he denied it up until his death, i think it is just as interesting to know that the apes in the 'planet' movies were head, hand and sometimes leg pieces... no full body suits.

  • I never understood why people always mention how advanced the POTA movies were...you are right. They feature hand makeup and face prosthetics...where are the full body suit? In Beneath the POTA we see James Gregory and Maurice Evans (Ursus and Zaius) in a sauna scene, with only towels on...the suits are big, bulky, and very typical of ape suits of the time. Check it!

  • I can't believe you take the lies that Ray Wallace's family is feeding you, If you would do some real research, yourself, you would find that Ray always said the prints he found were real. He and/or his family never had anything to do with the Patterson Footage, his family claimed the prints he found were fake so that people would quit bugging them about it.

  • hellotimetogo, these videos on YouTube are compressed; and I have yet to see one that matched the 2nd generation copy that Rene Dahinden showed a group of ~30 that I was part of. (He owned the original at the time)

    It's definitely NOT a person in a suit.

  • Ray Wallace had nothing whatsoever to do with the Patterson/Gimlin film. Ray was involved in the footprint finds that occurred, some 10 years previous to the P/G film's shooting, which let to the coining of the name "bigfoot" (or "Big Foot", as it originally appeared). Wallace's footprints and the P/G film occurred in fairly close geographic proximity to one another - that is the only connection.

  • its real

  • It looked at them to see if Roger Patterson and Gimlin were going to follow her. Look at the knees, look at the shoulder blades, and watch how it turns his whole body instead of its head.

  • I hate to be the devil's advocate, but if it were a costume then the person inside wouldn't necessarily be able to turn his head like he would normally without a big cumbersome suit. That said, i'm still intrigued by the images-i really don't know what to make of it. Hopefully scientists will be able to say definitively that it is a suit or not, thus, putting an end to the mystery.

  • scientist have no brains, they want to live on mars cause they think asteroid is going to destroy earth. trust me freind, this vid is real

  • what about the swinging boobies?

  • Also, the Hippopotomous was thought to be a hoax because of its tiny legs and huge body.

  • Well, there you go.

  • And the West didn't know about the giant Panda bear until 1869, people need to thing about this, plenty of space for US Bigfoots to hide in, PLENTY.

  • wow i never knew that

  • From Wikipedia: 'The highest levels of protection as described by the IUCN, the international conservation agency, are Level I (Wilderness areas) and Level II (National Parks). The United States maintains 12% of Level I and II lands in the world. These lands had a total area of 210,000 square miles.

  • Rabbit you also have to remember that Alaska is also part of the USA.

  • And don't forget, there are probably many more bigfoot in Canada than in the USA.

  • that is not exactly true. the main reason is due to hunting them wolves, mt lions, etc...down to protect livestock!

  • I want to beleve, remember that the gorillas were considered a myth until 1830´s something.

  • Thats Microsoft Michelle (windows voice)

  • Apple Victoria

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more