I mean common the guy has PHD, he's not a fucking idiot, I'm sure he can discern between a random occurrence and a phenomenon, I've seen lights as well, I've never felt the need to come out and tell people about it . Skepticism is great in some cases, but not everyone is trying to pull the wool over your eyes. A little logic goes a long way.
I'm lead to believe that guy is telling the truth for two simple pragmatic reasons. Not everything needs to be assessed empirically.
1) I've drinking quite heavily. I've never hallucinated before and certainly not to this extent. Alcohol is not a hallucinogen. This IS classified as an Ad Hominen.
2) The guy is clearly passionate and adamant about what he saw. He has a PHD, he already has income, so ultimately he has nothing to gain from this, more to lose.
@441meatloaf yea, but I don't think he would go that far with it in the first place if he had doubts. I believe he thinks he saw something. He might have drawn the wrong conclusion. But I really don't think he would go that far with it if he thought for a second he was wrong. It doesn't make sense.
How the hell was Bill "PWND"? These guys are claiming really stupid things, and he is telling them it doesn't make sense...then they got on thier periods and started yelling at him.
This is why its so frustrating to be a skeptic; I'm a proud donator to Shermer's Skeptics Society because they have the patience to debate jokers like this on t.v.
The problem I have with the skeptic community, which I feel attached to because I am an atheist and love the work of Hitchens, Dawkens, Dennett and the like, is that skeptics begin with a conclusion and retrofit all data to fit it. They are extremely unaware of their own propensity for violating their own rule #1. It is the opposite of science. A scientist should begin with no conclusion; the prevalence of UFO claims warrants its serious investigation.
@PostgodAfterbirth Here's the problem with that. The scientific way of looking at claims is from a default position of non acceptance. The default is that any claim is not fact until it is proven to be fact with quantifiable evidence. The accepted facts of science are considered facts because they have withstood the barrage of skepticism. When a claim is made, the position to begin from is that it is not fact, until it withstands the scrutiny of skeptical investigation.
@PostgodAfterbirth #2 - So it is the proper way to approach any claim to begin with the same conclusion every time "this is not fact", then use all existing datum and fact to attempt to disprove said claim. When all existing relevant datum and fact are exhausted, and enough current or newly acquired datum and fact support said claim, then it can be considered currently true, until data that falsifies it is gathered. This process is ongoing, and the true strength of science.
Does that idiot even know what an ad hominem fallacy is? What the fuck does he have a phd in, Economics? Fucking morons get these bullshit degrees and call themselves intelligent. What a buch of garbage.
Simple Definition of the Ad Hominem Attack: An attack on (about) the person.
Bill didn't say anything about the intelligence of anyone in that discussion. He simply stated that you can't and shouldn't jump to conclusions on a topic like this.
Bill Nye was correct in his skepticism - Most people take the side of their emotions over valid logic and reason and Bill was simply pointing this out...
It was the claiming scientist who should have easily recognized this and agreed with Bill instead of trying to put him down.
(Though it could've been a UFO chances are it was some other explainable occurrence or glitch in the camera - etc...)
haha yeah the man who's attacking him.. get a life loser, i don't give a shit if you have a PHD or an ASS, you're a fuckin douchebag who thinks insulting the man he's debating with makes him the winner.. go die you stupid fuck. i respect bill for keeping his composure when dealing with a pompous moron
You can't believe??? You can believe in that crazy conspiracy shit without evidence and its just beyond you that people wouldn't believe things that they don't have evidence for? I still can't believe you don't realize eorgjnqio created us all with its kejrgn.
I cant believe ppl still deny alien existence. Even Thomas Paine and Ben Franklin knew about aliens back in the 18th century. Christopher Columbus wrote about it in his journal, but it was never brought to the public cuz he said it looked like a minorah (spanish inquisition)
I'm sorry but Mr. Jacobs is wrong; to assert that Bill Nye was the one making ad hominem attacks is ludicrous. He was maintaining a balanced perspective on the issue, while Jacobs was resorting to unprofessional personal insults that he should be ashamed of. Oh, and by the way, if someone just snaps (like Jacobs did) at the slightest disagreement with their firmly held view, they probably haven't critically analyzed their own viewpoint.
@JosiahPlummer1988 "balanced perspective"? haha how can you call anyone who dismisses evidence based on his own personal dogmatic materialistic belief system as being "balanced" in any way whatsoever.
How about he study the facts for a start. Saying "It's quite a step" about incidents he hasn't even investigated (as shown by him getting facts wrong and being corrected on air) is not investigating... thats just debunking any idiot can cover their ears and not listen.
"You were wondering what girls were when I was serving..." And then he says "you're the one making ad hominem attacks saying it's quite a step." WTF? He makes an ad hominem attack, and then claims that Bill Nye questioning his *argument* is making an ad hominem attack?
Those guys are a bunch of losers afraid of their ego being bruised when proved wrong by a guy who's actually smart.
@hungrytomato Attacking someones credibility by pointing out that one of the witnesses was drinking is classified as an Ad Hominem. So Bill did instigate it and any adult knows drinking is not a hallucinogen, it's a depressant. So it was an obvious attempt on Bill's part to bring in to question the credibility of the witness, thus an ad hominem.
@12Ominous Not sleeping enough affects the judgment and interpretations of events. And so do alcohol. It is not an ad hominem attack to point out that someone might not have been in the right state of mind at the time of the events when the only argument proposed is the interpretation of what someone saw. He never said it was not an alien aircraft but that there was no proof to get to the conclusion that it was one. And that sir is what a good skeptic should have done.
@MrG0TH1ER But think logically of the extent. It can make you make bad decisions sure, but blow something like a light out of proportion to that extent? This kind of misjudgment from alcohol I find it hard to believe. It's a metaphorical Ad Hominem - pointing out that someone was drinking is the equivalent of pointing out that he was temporarily stupid/delusional. He was also very much using it as an argument It's not sufficient grounds to render a claim invalid. To a lot of people it will be.
@12Ominous Without any drugs and enough sleep observer have been proven to make bad perceptual interpretations. Even if he were not drunk, seeing "a thing" wouldn't constitute a proof in the first place. If it were demonstrate that the observer was under the influence of something it would make it even more probable that he misinterpreted what he saw. It's a very simple observation that even courts consider important when they need to judge the claim of witnesses.
@MrG0TH1ER I'm not saying it constitutes proof. I'm saying it was a cheap shot. Oh absolutely, but that's because courts need to find a defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, this often is interpreted as beyond any doubt at all. But that's also an appeal to authority fallacy. Just because the court has very strict procedures doesn't mean guilty parties haven't gotten away with murder or haven't been put to death.
@12Ominous Sober people with no psychological problems also claimed to have seen lepercons, fairies and God. Should we believe them without a proof? The answer is no. We need to find more evidences/proof to accept that kind of claims.
@MrG0TH1ER I'm not saying I believe him, but you don't necessarily require empirical evidence for everything, a lot of claims can be assessed logically and rationally. There's nothing wrong with belief based on eye witness accounts or trusting someones word. I'm not going to form a Religion around it or change my life for it. But I'm not necessarily going to completely dismiss him. Yes, collectively society does, what I'm saying is there's nothing wrong with conceding to the possibility.
@outlaw87100 : / that's such a tired cliche now it's kind of lost its impact . Given the complexity of the Universe, the billions upon billions of galaxies that exist, I would concede to the possibility of anything. The existence of Leprechauns would hardly impress me, but I wouldn't equate something that is fantasy to what is a pretty much a scientific certainty.
@MrG0TH1ER So that's why the guy was pissed off. It's basically a low blow. You drank 1 beer so you must have been hallucinating, lol. It's a logical fallacy.
@12Ominous I don't think you understand what a logical fallacy really is.
Plus he never said that he must have been hallucinating. Bill Nye never claimed to know that the people didn't saw what they say they saw. He said (or was trying to say) that it is possible and common for human being to misinterpret what they see (and alcohol is an aggravating factor of that phenomenon). I would agree with you he was not as articulate as he could but it was not an attack or a logical fallacy.
@MrG0TH1ER A logical fallacy is when a conclusion is drawn from an incorrect premise.
So for instance in this case it assumed that Drinking (A) = Stupid/delusional (B)and from that erroneous presumption Guy (C) was drinking (A) there for C= B - Guy = stupid and not credible.
@MrG0TH1ER It's implied though, he doesn't have to explicitly say he was hallucinating. No perhaps not, but it was an sly attempt to debunk him (I think). But yea you're right, that's what he was there for anyways.
@hungrytomato it's a cheap shot. There's a notable social stigma attached to drinking, especially in the professional world. This could easily sway an ignorant audience to doubt the individuals claims under the presumption derived from the stereotype that alcohol makes you stupid, incompetent and see things. The first two of which can be true, the last which isn't.
Bill Nye is by no means 'out of his league' as the description says, he's just the only one using common sense and not jumping to conclusions. These other guys are just so set in their ways they're not open minded enough to even consider what he's saying, they'd rather insult him needlessly like little kids that know they're wrong.
@wageofsins Not jumping to conclusions. LOL.. thats all Bill Nye does. He hears something and jumps to a conclusion that suits his personal dogmatic materialistic view of the world. No evidence... just theories... and then uses that great science get out of jail free card.... Occams Razor.... to argue against something he knows absolutely nothing about and has never even bothered to investigate.
@frankmat No evidence? Just theories. What is wrong with you? Theories are explanations based on evidence. I'm sure he would love to believe in intelligent life and civilization as much as the next guy but an extraordinary claim should require extraordinary evidence and not a 50 year old testimonial. On top of that, he's not denying the man saw something, but he's saying the guy's conclusion is a significant jump. It's a big jump to go from "can't explain" to "must be extraterrestrial"
@thatguyinthatband So exactly what part of what Bill Nye said was evidence? NONE of it. He had no evidence only to sit there like a clown denying anything.
The biggest joke was when Bill Nye the deny guy... pulled out a Top Secret document and showed the redacted markings and deliberately misleads people into thinking it is because the UFO believers don't want you contacting the person in the document.... when the truth is EVERY released top secret document has redactions.
@frankmat Well it was tough for him to get a word in edgewise while being blasted simultaneously with personal attacks from 3 guys at once. Bill Nye is not refuting the claim, he is only saying that if he were to believe it, he would need more evidence. (Like say evidence from all of the camera phones and street cameras etc. that are employed these days.) He's saying that skepticism is a reasonable standpoint rather than believing one man's untestable explanation of an isolated event.
@thatguyinthatband Firstly it wasn't 1 man. It was several men... and not only that this isn't your farmers from the hills... that usually gets thrown up. These are men entrusted with handling nuclear weapons... being accused of basically being delusional.
Bill even went as far as to try to discredit one of them by saying someone suspected he was drunk (a common tactic of debunkers is to attack credibility if you can't attack evidence) yet provided no evidence of this.
@bird2049 "extrordinary claims require extrordinary evidence" is complete and utter CRAP. Extraordinary claims require the same amount of evidence ANYTHING else does. And Extraordinary to whom? Science? The same science that is continually being proven wrong on a daily basis and moving the goalposts.
Again... it is a "get out of jail free card" term dreamt up by Scientists as a reason to argue against something which doesn't fit their personal belief system.
@frankmat its not proven wrong, its better understanding. science has not done any ills it Invented penecilin and the computer you are using and the internet. you cant believe something because of some half drunken airforce buddies saw a flashing light they have never seen before. if you do away with skepticism you allow all the other bullshit beliefs into science every claim needs real evidence
@bird2049 a perfect example is 1000 years ago when people looked at the stars for guidance. no wait thats still now because ppl believe any stupid thing without the proper evidence.
@bird2049 Skepticism I have absolutely no problem with. Cynicism and Debunkers who use their personal bias and belief systems to discredit and debunk things in which most cases they have not even investigated... and do it in a way that they manipulate the facts to do it... that I have a problem with. That is what the Bill Nye's, Michael Shermers and James Randis of the world do.
@bird2049 A perfect example is that 100 years ago there was no scientific evidence that not washing your hands when delivery babies killed mothers... because science had not discovered "germs".
Yet the arrogance of the science fraternity in refusing to tell they doctors should wash their hands before delivery.... because there was no "scientific evidence" of it is what we call modern day skepticism.
Science has a lot to answer for, especially the idiots that use it to hide behind.
@thatguyinthatband Also you talk about cameras etc as evidence... what about the Phoenix Lights? There WAS photo/video evidence and it was seen by 1000s. Bill tried to debunk that with a theory about flares in which he couldn't even get his facts correct.... and had to be corrected several times by those who HAD investigated it.
That's all being a skeptic/debunker is, no investigation, just find any way possible to not have to admit something that is against your beliefs.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Bill Nye turns up to debate something he hasn't even read about and can't even get his facts straight. How the hell is that "science" when you don't even bother to look at the data?
@MushiePuppet17 What? No data only hearsay? Are you for real??? You are one of those skeptics they talk about who proclaim rather than investigate. Pathetic.
So what is radar data? Is that "hearsay" and "unsubstantiated claims"? Let me guess... 10,000 people who say the Phoenix lights... that was all "hearsay" as well. 10,000 people all got together to create one big UFO hoax and all stuck to their story after all these years!
you think that guy owned bill nye because he yelled at him, i think that's what gives bill the win. and bill nye did not resort to ad hominem, that was the pot calling the kettle black.
the truth about the liberal/athiest cult and their cult religions (BULLSHIT) of "space exploration" and "science". EXPOSED! watch?v=dW0vHUOGW4E&feature=watch_response
They didn't have a shred of good evidence that this really happened. Any person can say they saw a UFO and yell insults at anyone who doesn't believe them.
@usafadb what im saying is that they didnt have the actual video, so they did there best to re make it. im not saying this is true or not. just that if the cia TOOK it, your not getting that shit back
Carl Sagan is rolling is his grave if Bill is not open to the possibility of UFO's from another planet. Bill Nye being skeptical to this guys claim is pretty much equal to calling him a lier, thats why the professor got pissed because Bill isn't being scientific he's being an asshole. - There is a lot of credible information coming out with the Disclosure Project.
Looks like Bill was saying it's a hard thing to believe this claim without proof while the other guy was belittling him with personal attacks. I have no idea how anyone could think that Bill lost this debate.
What the fuck has become of american "news" television? I know King isn't really news, but he did command an aire of respect at some time in the past.
Well spoken, Bill Nye. If only more people understood that science doesn't work the same way as a comedy show, or politics, or in many of our movies and TV shows. But a bunch of men cranking numbers in lab coats while waiting for tests that can take up to years to run doesn't make for good entertainment; loud, confident, angry, and emotional men and women do.
so a few guys get mad because they essentially have no proof about anything, mis-understand Nye, make jabs and his career and they are the ones doing the pwning?
I'ts idiots who believe the guy screaming the loudest and interrupting the most is right. These guys sounds like middle-school children who can't stand someone questioning them. If you are trying to say you saw aliens that shot plasma rays then you better have good evidence not just be loud and obnoxious.
It goes to show that having a PHD and an expensive suit doesn't make you socially capable of holding a logical debate. I respect Bill's ability to extract the meaning of their retort's by dismissing any condescending or bias remarks, tones and gestures pointed at him.
These men of science sitting with Bill seem to care more about making an unproven point than getting their ass back into the kitchen to cook up the next order. They would rather cry over an alleged pasta spill that nobody saw.
The one guy said he didn't see the UFO while they were filming because the rocket was so far away. So I'd imagine whatever they saw on film was pretty small as well. So a skeptical perspective of it (which is why Nye was invited....to offer that view) could be to say it was something close to the lens such as a dust particle or insect. It does not HAVE to be a UFO, which would then point towards something ET since it would have to be very high tech for the time... N
Bill held his own even though he was interrupted and the other "men" in the room were throwing sissy fits that someone would question them and simply ask for proof of their conclusion...
Look at ANY STATEMENT EVER IN THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD. If skeptics are marginalized and avoided and shut down when they express doubt, rather than being shown the compelling evidence for the veracity of the claim, then it means the claim is false. It's that simple.
@UseYerEFFINBrain Your statement is very stupidly false and a complete waste of words. The truth is still the truth, whether or not skeptics are convinced. In EVERY INSTANCE IN THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD the skeptics have ALWAYS been proven wrong eventually. But they have ALWAYS been the initial persecutors of those who tried to show the truth, only to run away like cowards when the skeptics are the ones shown to be damned braindead. So use your effin brain before it rots away.
"In EVERY INSTANCE IN THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD the skeptics have ALWAYS been proven wrong eventually" Oh, I see. So Santa is actually real? Bigfoot real? The moon is made of cheese? There are alligators in NYC's sewers? It's confirmed that black cats bring bad luck? Zombies exist? Women who fly on broomsticks exist?
Oh ok. Let's not be skeptical, because all these things are real!
@govahnator " In EVERY INSTANCE IN THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD the skeptics have ALWAYS been proven wrong eventually" came straight from your arse.Skeptics believed in a heliocentric universe, that earth might not be flat, that diseases might not be god's vengeance on humanity.And they were right.Like that grumpy old schmuck you have huge claims and no evidence, go back to some loony UFO blog, youl find safety in numbers there.
I would say that it's extraordinary to claim that a box made of little more than plastic, metal, and a little silicon, with no moving parts, and the size of two matchboxes, allows me to fling birds at castles made by green pigs on a high-resolution, touch-responsive screen. And yet, this object (known as an iPod touch or basically any smartphone) clearly exists; moreover, I don't believe that it requires an extraordinary amount of proof.
Larry King always had a lot more respect than was warranted. He had another show where he had those cold-talking, bereaved-hustling scumbags like John Edward 'argue' their side; what side? Much like this; there's a reason Bill Nye is outnumbered 5-to-1 here. Quality vs. quantity, and a phony attempt to sell us provocative television
Bill Nye is the only respectable guy on here. The others are nothing but a bunch of ignorance people. Bill Nye was trying to say their side, will the others just attacked to him. Just because we don't understand what we are seeing, doesn't mean that it is what we want it to be.
Idiots these days who see a light in the sky and instantly think its aliens... Get a grip people. And Nye does not get pwned in this, he simply puts forward logical ideas and perspectives which are ignored by the ignorant, all because 'they saw something', or 'heard something from *this guy* ' and so on....
Bob Jacob's antagonism didn't do him any favours here. The same could be said for the other guys laughing like school children at petty insults. Poor form.
What I hate is they guy said that it appeared to be a plasma bolt. What is he doing on to believe that it was truly a plasma bolt? They had nothing to test that it was a plasma bolt. Fact is no one knows what it was and that is all that we can say.
Nothing will be resolved until we see the actual footage and obviously it's been made clear that'll never happen. I think it's always funny how the scientific community, backed by the government, spends millions and billions to find other life forms in the universe. Yet are always accused of "covering up" when such life forms are found. The point that Nye was making is without the actual footage for everyone to see, we can't make any conclusions.A crazy idea can't be proven only with hearsay.
Seems Jacobs got hung up because he thought Nye was calling him a lair. After the name calling and insulting, he lost me. Why? Why do you need to react to something like that if you know that you're lying and etc? If you know you're not lying and other person is false, stay calm, let your words (not your face/actions) speak for themselves.
This actually seems like classroom antics to me. Group of people rag on one person who contradicts them. Sad to see this continue.
Larry King is being a humongous prick..
outlaw87100 1 hour ago
Poor Bill confronted with this huge douchebag.
MrG0TH1ER 4 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I mean common the guy has PHD, he's not a fucking idiot, I'm sure he can discern between a random occurrence and a phenomenon, I've seen lights as well, I've never felt the need to come out and tell people about it . Skepticism is great in some cases, but not everyone is trying to pull the wool over your eyes. A little logic goes a long way.
12Ominous 10 hours ago
Comment removed
12Ominous 10 hours ago
I'm lead to believe that guy is telling the truth for two simple pragmatic reasons. Not everything needs to be assessed empirically.
1) I've drinking quite heavily. I've never hallucinated before and certainly not to this extent. Alcohol is not a hallucinogen. This IS classified as an Ad Hominen.
2) The guy is clearly passionate and adamant about what he saw. He has a PHD, he already has income, so ultimately he has nothing to gain from this, more to lose.
12Ominous 10 hours ago
@12Ominous
He has his reputation = ego to lose if he was made to look stupid by Bill. So he does have something to lose.
441meatloaf 4 hours ago
@441meatloaf yea, but I don't think he would go that far with it in the first place if he had doubts. I believe he thinks he saw something. He might have drawn the wrong conclusion. But I really don't think he would go that far with it if he thought for a second he was wrong. It doesn't make sense.
12Ominous 3 hours ago
Say what you will but Bill Nye did get PWND so hard.
benjaminengray 13 hours ago
@benjaminengray
How the hell was Bill "PWND"? These guys are claiming really stupid things, and he is telling them it doesn't make sense...then they got on thier periods and started yelling at him.
TheKenTerry 8 hours ago
@Drunkenlos hilarious title
SlugChristie 15 hours ago
Larry King is a shit host in this clip. He lets a bunch of losers get away with debating like a baboon waving its cock around.
youngestofdeez 1 day ago
Poster... this video showed me nothing...
Grnvolpe 1 day ago
Bill Nye is full of it!.... doesnt know what he's talking about.
marek0086 1 day ago
@marek0086 bill nye is fucking genius. to be incredibly smart and funny is pretty amazing.
ghostling55 20 hours ago
@ghostling55~ funny?!... he's a total lamo!
How dare u call him funny!
marek0086 19 hours ago
@marek0086 its cause he's too smart for you :3
ghostling55 18 hours ago
@ghostling55~ ... please.
marek0086 18 hours ago
bill nye wears bow-ties instead of ties, your argument is invalid
skillcosby88 1 day ago
This is why its so frustrating to be a skeptic; I'm a proud donator to Shermer's Skeptics Society because they have the patience to debate jokers like this on t.v.
LetsGo6009 1 day ago
The problem I have with the skeptic community, which I feel attached to because I am an atheist and love the work of Hitchens, Dawkens, Dennett and the like, is that skeptics begin with a conclusion and retrofit all data to fit it. They are extremely unaware of their own propensity for violating their own rule #1. It is the opposite of science. A scientist should begin with no conclusion; the prevalence of UFO claims warrants its serious investigation.
PostgodAfterbirth 1 day ago
@PostgodAfterbirth Here's the problem with that. The scientific way of looking at claims is from a default position of non acceptance. The default is that any claim is not fact until it is proven to be fact with quantifiable evidence. The accepted facts of science are considered facts because they have withstood the barrage of skepticism. When a claim is made, the position to begin from is that it is not fact, until it withstands the scrutiny of skeptical investigation.
foobee2 1 day ago
@PostgodAfterbirth #2 - So it is the proper way to approach any claim to begin with the same conclusion every time "this is not fact", then use all existing datum and fact to attempt to disprove said claim. When all existing relevant datum and fact are exhausted, and enough current or newly acquired datum and fact support said claim, then it can be considered currently true, until data that falsifies it is gathered. This process is ongoing, and the true strength of science.
foobee2 1 day ago
Does that idiot even know what an ad hominem fallacy is? What the fuck does he have a phd in, Economics? Fucking morons get these bullshit degrees and call themselves intelligent. What a buch of garbage.
ColossusShade 1 day ago
Simple Definition of the Ad Hominem Attack: An attack on (about) the person.
Bill didn't say anything about the intelligence of anyone in that discussion. He simply stated that you can't and shouldn't jump to conclusions on a topic like this.
Cloudstrife112233 1 day ago
Jocobs was loud and assertive, therefore he must be right.
Guitcad1 2 days ago 2
You can't see something on film with your own eyes. You can see the final result of the development of film.
ArranoGris 2 days ago
Bill Nye was correct in his skepticism - Most people take the side of their emotions over valid logic and reason and Bill was simply pointing this out...
It was the claiming scientist who should have easily recognized this and agreed with Bill instead of trying to put him down.
(Though it could've been a UFO chances are it was some other explainable occurrence or glitch in the camera - etc...)
jxaxmxixn 2 days ago 5
How is Bill pwned in this? He is asking valid questions.
ms9809 2 days ago 4
That old fuck Bill was talking to needs to just stfu
iTheRandom1 2 days ago
bob looks like the "doctor" from cannonball run.
i can't believe more people aren't commenting on his hair. wouldn't it be funny is kids starting wearing comb overs?
benjie414 3 days ago
This was hillarious
jay733 3 days ago
Bill Nye was basically calling the guy either crazy, dumb, or a liar. I'd get pissed too.
KMPaz4op 3 days ago
haha yeah the man who's attacking him.. get a life loser, i don't give a shit if you have a PHD or an ASS, you're a fuckin douchebag who thinks insulting the man he's debating with makes him the winner.. go die you stupid fuck. i respect bill for keeping his composure when dealing with a pompous moron
SSJinchuuriki 3 days ago 3
dr jacobs saw his claim to fame going out the window and he got mad
detahdomo 4 days ago
Bill Nye is a Gaylord
shiftyways1987 4 days ago
@shiftyways1987 Astute observation, good sir... -_-
Sunno94 4 days ago
@Sunno94 made me cry laughin X'D
SlipperyPedo 3 days ago
That bearded dude is silly. He can't follow what Nye is saying, so he just attacks the person.
magnusalpha 4 days ago
You can't believe??? You can believe in that crazy conspiracy shit without evidence and its just beyond you that people wouldn't believe things that they don't have evidence for? I still can't believe you don't realize eorgjnqio created us all with its kejrgn.
marsjacobvolta 4 days ago
I cant believe ppl still deny alien existence. Even Thomas Paine and Ben Franklin knew about aliens back in the 18th century. Christopher Columbus wrote about it in his journal, but it was never brought to the public cuz he said it looked like a minorah (spanish inquisition)
BillDaBurgerEater 4 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Robert Jacobs has a phD in Dramatic Arts.... lol
killwill66 5 days ago
Y U MAD BRO?
iiHateSouljaBoy 5 days ago
"That's quite a step - you bet it's quite a step." lol did this guy just agree with Bill?
Uberboy07 5 days ago
@Drunkenlos ...You trolling?
Noisemaze 5 days ago
I'm sorry but Mr. Jacobs is wrong; to assert that Bill Nye was the one making ad hominem attacks is ludicrous. He was maintaining a balanced perspective on the issue, while Jacobs was resorting to unprofessional personal insults that he should be ashamed of. Oh, and by the way, if someone just snaps (like Jacobs did) at the slightest disagreement with their firmly held view, they probably haven't critically analyzed their own viewpoint.
JosiahPlummer1988 6 days ago 3
@JosiahPlummer1988 "balanced perspective"? haha how can you call anyone who dismisses evidence based on his own personal dogmatic materialistic belief system as being "balanced" in any way whatsoever.
How about he study the facts for a start. Saying "It's quite a step" about incidents he hasn't even investigated (as shown by him getting facts wrong and being corrected on air) is not investigating... thats just debunking any idiot can cover their ears and not listen.
frankmat 5 days ago
Bill Nye is a badass and these guys are fucking cunts.
biskwikman 6 days ago 34
@biskwikman Damn straight. Every time I put my dick in a bitch, I make her call me Bill Nye. Makes em' come every time.
Pelcurus 2 days ago
Jacobs needs anger management
Trancemaster2052 1 week ago 3
"You were wondering what girls were when I was serving..." And then he says "you're the one making ad hominem attacks saying it's quite a step." WTF? He makes an ad hominem attack, and then claims that Bill Nye questioning his *argument* is making an ad hominem attack?
Those guys are a bunch of losers afraid of their ego being bruised when proved wrong by a guy who's actually smart.
hungrytomato 1 week ago 14
@hungrytomato O wut de herrr!
DailyStaley 1 day ago
@hungrytomato Attacking someones credibility by pointing out that one of the witnesses was drinking is classified as an Ad Hominem. So Bill did instigate it and any adult knows drinking is not a hallucinogen, it's a depressant. So it was an obvious attempt on Bill's part to bring in to question the credibility of the witness, thus an ad hominem.
12Ominous 9 hours ago
@12Ominous Not sleeping enough affects the judgment and interpretations of events. And so do alcohol. It is not an ad hominem attack to point out that someone might not have been in the right state of mind at the time of the events when the only argument proposed is the interpretation of what someone saw. He never said it was not an alien aircraft but that there was no proof to get to the conclusion that it was one. And that sir is what a good skeptic should have done.
MrG0TH1ER 4 hours ago
@MrG0TH1ER But think logically of the extent. It can make you make bad decisions sure, but blow something like a light out of proportion to that extent? This kind of misjudgment from alcohol I find it hard to believe. It's a metaphorical Ad Hominem - pointing out that someone was drinking is the equivalent of pointing out that he was temporarily stupid/delusional. He was also very much using it as an argument It's not sufficient grounds to render a claim invalid. To a lot of people it will be.
12Ominous 3 hours ago
@12Ominous Without any drugs and enough sleep observer have been proven to make bad perceptual interpretations. Even if he were not drunk, seeing "a thing" wouldn't constitute a proof in the first place. If it were demonstrate that the observer was under the influence of something it would make it even more probable that he misinterpreted what he saw. It's a very simple observation that even courts consider important when they need to judge the claim of witnesses.
MrG0TH1ER 3 hours ago
@MrG0TH1ER I'm not saying it constitutes proof. I'm saying it was a cheap shot. Oh absolutely, but that's because courts need to find a defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, this often is interpreted as beyond any doubt at all. But that's also an appeal to authority fallacy. Just because the court has very strict procedures doesn't mean guilty parties haven't gotten away with murder or haven't been put to death.
12Ominous 3 hours ago
@12Ominous Sober people with no psychological problems also claimed to have seen lepercons, fairies and God. Should we believe them without a proof? The answer is no. We need to find more evidences/proof to accept that kind of claims.
MrG0TH1ER 3 hours ago
@MrG0TH1ER I'm not saying I believe him, but you don't necessarily require empirical evidence for everything, a lot of claims can be assessed logically and rationally. There's nothing wrong with belief based on eye witness accounts or trusting someones word. I'm not going to form a Religion around it or change my life for it. But I'm not necessarily going to completely dismiss him. Yes, collectively society does, what I'm saying is there's nothing wrong with conceding to the possibility.
12Ominous 3 hours ago
@12Ominous You should also concede to the possibility that leprechauns and fairies also exist... santa claus too..
outlaw87100 1 hour ago
@outlaw87100 : / that's such a tired cliche now it's kind of lost its impact . Given the complexity of the Universe, the billions upon billions of galaxies that exist, I would concede to the possibility of anything. The existence of Leprechauns would hardly impress me, but I wouldn't equate something that is fantasy to what is a pretty much a scientific certainty.
12Ominous 50 minutes ago
@12Ominous Where's the physical evidence?? Oh sorry, the CIA took it, right? Boo hoo lol
outlaw87100 26 minutes ago
@MrG0TH1ER So that's why the guy was pissed off. It's basically a low blow. You drank 1 beer so you must have been hallucinating, lol. It's a logical fallacy.
12Ominous 3 hours ago
@12Ominous I don't think you understand what a logical fallacy really is.
Plus he never said that he must have been hallucinating. Bill Nye never claimed to know that the people didn't saw what they say they saw. He said (or was trying to say) that it is possible and common for human being to misinterpret what they see (and alcohol is an aggravating factor of that phenomenon). I would agree with you he was not as articulate as he could but it was not an attack or a logical fallacy.
MrG0TH1ER 3 hours ago
@MrG0TH1ER A logical fallacy is when a conclusion is drawn from an incorrect premise.
So for instance in this case it assumed that Drinking (A) = Stupid/delusional (B)and from that erroneous presumption Guy (C) was drinking (A) there for C= B - Guy = stupid and not credible.
12Ominous 3 hours ago
@MrG0TH1ER It's implied though, he doesn't have to explicitly say he was hallucinating. No perhaps not, but it was an sly attempt to debunk him (I think). But yea you're right, that's what he was there for anyways.
12Ominous 3 hours ago
@hungrytomato it's a cheap shot. There's a notable social stigma attached to drinking, especially in the professional world. This could easily sway an ignorant audience to doubt the individuals claims under the presumption derived from the stereotype that alcohol makes you stupid, incompetent and see things. The first two of which can be true, the last which isn't.
12Ominous 9 hours ago
Bill Nye is by no means 'out of his league' as the description says, he's just the only one using common sense and not jumping to conclusions. These other guys are just so set in their ways they're not open minded enough to even consider what he's saying, they'd rather insult him needlessly like little kids that know they're wrong.
wageofsins 1 week ago 5
@wageofsins Not jumping to conclusions. LOL.. thats all Bill Nye does. He hears something and jumps to a conclusion that suits his personal dogmatic materialistic view of the world. No evidence... just theories... and then uses that great science get out of jail free card.... Occams Razor.... to argue against something he knows absolutely nothing about and has never even bothered to investigate.
frankmat 1 week ago
@frankmat No evidence? Just theories. What is wrong with you? Theories are explanations based on evidence. I'm sure he would love to believe in intelligent life and civilization as much as the next guy but an extraordinary claim should require extraordinary evidence and not a 50 year old testimonial. On top of that, he's not denying the man saw something, but he's saying the guy's conclusion is a significant jump. It's a big jump to go from "can't explain" to "must be extraterrestrial"
thatguyinthatband 6 days ago 3
@thatguyinthatband So exactly what part of what Bill Nye said was evidence? NONE of it. He had no evidence only to sit there like a clown denying anything.
The biggest joke was when Bill Nye the deny guy... pulled out a Top Secret document and showed the redacted markings and deliberately misleads people into thinking it is because the UFO believers don't want you contacting the person in the document.... when the truth is EVERY released top secret document has redactions.
frankmat 5 days ago
@frankmat Well it was tough for him to get a word in edgewise while being blasted simultaneously with personal attacks from 3 guys at once. Bill Nye is not refuting the claim, he is only saying that if he were to believe it, he would need more evidence. (Like say evidence from all of the camera phones and street cameras etc. that are employed these days.) He's saying that skepticism is a reasonable standpoint rather than believing one man's untestable explanation of an isolated event.
thatguyinthatband 5 days ago 2
@thatguyinthatband Firstly it wasn't 1 man. It was several men... and not only that this isn't your farmers from the hills... that usually gets thrown up. These are men entrusted with handling nuclear weapons... being accused of basically being delusional.
Bill even went as far as to try to discredit one of them by saying someone suspected he was drunk (a common tactic of debunkers is to attack credibility if you can't attack evidence) yet provided no evidence of this.
frankmat 4 days ago
@frankmat being a serviceman doesnt qualify you to say something you saw was a UFO extrordinary claims require extrordinary evidence.
bird2049 4 days ago
@bird2049 "extrordinary claims require extrordinary evidence" is complete and utter CRAP. Extraordinary claims require the same amount of evidence ANYTHING else does. And Extraordinary to whom? Science? The same science that is continually being proven wrong on a daily basis and moving the goalposts.
Again... it is a "get out of jail free card" term dreamt up by Scientists as a reason to argue against something which doesn't fit their personal belief system.
frankmat 4 days ago
@frankmat its not proven wrong, its better understanding. science has not done any ills it Invented penecilin and the computer you are using and the internet. you cant believe something because of some half drunken airforce buddies saw a flashing light they have never seen before. if you do away with skepticism you allow all the other bullshit beliefs into science every claim needs real evidence
bird2049 4 days ago
@bird2049 a perfect example is 1000 years ago when people looked at the stars for guidance. no wait thats still now because ppl believe any stupid thing without the proper evidence.
bird2049 4 days ago
@bird2049 Skepticism I have absolutely no problem with. Cynicism and Debunkers who use their personal bias and belief systems to discredit and debunk things in which most cases they have not even investigated... and do it in a way that they manipulate the facts to do it... that I have a problem with. That is what the Bill Nye's, Michael Shermers and James Randis of the world do.
frankmat 4 days ago
@frankmat Agreed
shiftyways1987 4 days ago
@bird2049 A perfect example is that 100 years ago there was no scientific evidence that not washing your hands when delivery babies killed mothers... because science had not discovered "germs".
Yet the arrogance of the science fraternity in refusing to tell they doctors should wash their hands before delivery.... because there was no "scientific evidence" of it is what we call modern day skepticism.
Science has a lot to answer for, especially the idiots that use it to hide behind.
frankmat 4 days ago
@thatguyinthatband Also you talk about cameras etc as evidence... what about the Phoenix Lights? There WAS photo/video evidence and it was seen by 1000s. Bill tried to debunk that with a theory about flares in which he couldn't even get his facts correct.... and had to be corrected several times by those who HAD investigated it.
That's all being a skeptic/debunker is, no investigation, just find any way possible to not have to admit something that is against your beliefs.
frankmat 4 days ago
PHD looks like some drunk ass hobo.
2583060 1 week ago 3
Bob Jacobs: "I'm not saying it was aliens... but it was aliens."
HardforJesus 1 week ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Bill Nye turns up to debate something he hasn't even read about and can't even get his facts straight. How the hell is that "science" when you don't even bother to look at the data?
frankmat 1 week ago
@frankmat There is no "data," only hearsay and unsubstantiated claims.
MushiePuppet17 1 week ago 2
@MushiePuppet17 What? No data only hearsay? Are you for real??? You are one of those skeptics they talk about who proclaim rather than investigate. Pathetic.
So what is radar data? Is that "hearsay" and "unsubstantiated claims"? Let me guess... 10,000 people who say the Phoenix lights... that was all "hearsay" as well. 10,000 people all got together to create one big UFO hoax and all stuck to their story after all these years!
frankmat 1 week ago
Bob Jacobs is a fucking asshole.
JustinianLXXXII 1 week ago
Comment removed
JustinianLXXXII 1 week ago
There's Bill Nye and three assholes... right? That's what I saw!
Oblic008 1 week ago
Bill absolutely won this argument. "science"
mattgilman207 1 week ago
you think that guy owned bill nye because he yelled at him, i think that's what gives bill the win. and bill nye did not resort to ad hominem, that was the pot calling the kettle black.
whatsnextyoulittlefu 1 week ago
The guy makes fun of Bill's sexual prowess, then immediately follows by accusing Bill of making ad hominem attacks. Yeah, Bill won.
evilanagram 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
the truth about the liberal/athiest cult and their cult religions (BULLSHIT) of "space exploration" and "science". EXPOSED! watch?v=dW0vHUOGW4E&feature=watch_response
wildlikker423 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
the truth about the liberal/athiest cult and their cult religions (BULLSHIT) of "space exploration" and "science". EXPOSED!
wildlikker423 1 week ago
these particular UFO guys are just as bad as religious people
adebrysi 1 week ago
How did Bill get pwned? He is right
DragonfallCIA 1 week ago
This is a great way to make $. You don't have to prove anything..
GoBlair84 1 week ago
lol it was hilarious though when the nut said "are you going to do this with vinegar and baking soda, bill?"
theSicilianToe 1 week ago
They didn't have a shred of good evidence that this really happened. Any person can say they saw a UFO and yell insults at anyone who doesn't believe them.
thewhite9t 1 week ago
This guy is a prick- how could you act this way to Bill Nye? If he punched me, I'd be tempted to thank him.
ManufacturedLegions 1 week ago
Wow, fuck those guys. Seriously. <3 Bill.
TheAzureSky1 1 week ago
...(animate simulation)....didnt everyone see that?!
usafadb 1 week ago
@usafadb well... yeah, not like they could receive footage that the CIA or whatever took away.
swittzman 1 week ago
@swittzman so with that logic I could depict a flying spaghetti monster
usafadb 1 week ago
@usafadb what im saying is that they didnt have the actual video, so they did there best to re make it. im not saying this is true or not. just that if the cia TOOK it, your not getting that shit back
swittzman 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Carl Sagan is rolling is his grave if Bill is not open to the possibility of UFO's from another planet. Bill Nye being skeptical to this guys claim is pretty much equal to calling him a lier, thats why the professor got pissed because Bill isn't being scientific he's being an asshole. - There is a lot of credible information coming out with the Disclosure Project.
CAinfowarrior 1 week ago
Comment removed
CAinfowarrior 1 week ago
lol that guy was about to cry because Bill said no to his mystery lights on a dark night.
sushanalone 1 week ago
and old bastards everywhere wonder why younger generations don't respect them.
macthemec 1 week ago
Jacobs is protecting his moneymaker. That's why he gets so angry.
ranger1843 1 week ago
Bill is awesome and the other guy is an idiot with no proof but I admit I laughed at the "are you gonna do this with baking soda and vinegar, bill?"
onund2 1 week ago
Looks like Bill was saying it's a hard thing to believe this claim without proof while the other guy was belittling him with personal attacks. I have no idea how anyone could think that Bill lost this debate.
HiDeguild 1 week ago 80
What the fuck has become of american "news" television? I know King isn't really news, but he did command an aire of respect at some time in the past.
InfoPoet 1 week ago
i with nye on this one.
robthefirefly 1 week ago
Nye kept his cool he is just to fucking nice
FatCorporateCat 1 week ago
that old guy is a dick.
paulgtmovies 1 week ago 2
Comment removed
NewEonOrchestra 1 week ago
Well spoken, Bill Nye. If only more people understood that science doesn't work the same way as a comedy show, or politics, or in many of our movies and TV shows. But a bunch of men cranking numbers in lab coats while waiting for tests that can take up to years to run doesn't make for good entertainment; loud, confident, angry, and emotional men and women do.
NewEonOrchestra 1 week ago
I wish Bill would've just replied once, just once, "u mad?"...a simple gesture....
bl4ckcards 1 week ago 17
WTF! An entire room against Bill Nye? How is that fair? Lol, poor guy
SciFaction 1 week ago
so a few guys get mad because they essentially have no proof about anything, mis-understand Nye, make jabs and his career and they are the ones doing the pwning?
I'ts idiots who believe the guy screaming the loudest and interrupting the most is right. These guys sounds like middle-school children who can't stand someone questioning them. If you are trying to say you saw aliens that shot plasma rays then you better have good evidence not just be loud and obnoxious.
Satozz 1 week ago
It goes to show that having a PHD and an expensive suit doesn't make you socially capable of holding a logical debate. I respect Bill's ability to extract the meaning of their retort's by dismissing any condescending or bias remarks, tones and gestures pointed at him.
These men of science sitting with Bill seem to care more about making an unproven point than getting their ass back into the kitchen to cook up the next order. They would rather cry over an alleged pasta spill that nobody saw.
doggytreat412 1 week ago
The one guy said he didn't see the UFO while they were filming because the rocket was so far away. So I'd imagine whatever they saw on film was pretty small as well. So a skeptical perspective of it (which is why Nye was invited....to offer that view) could be to say it was something close to the lens such as a dust particle or insect. It does not HAVE to be a UFO, which would then point towards something ET since it would have to be very high tech for the time... N
jrburke99 1 week ago
Mufucka said, "You Bet Its a Big Step!" all pissed...
d0cktor 1 week ago
Bill held his own even though he was interrupted and the other "men" in the room were throwing sissy fits that someone would question them and simply ask for proof of their conclusion...
devo85x 1 week ago 3
Look at ANY STATEMENT EVER IN THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD. If skeptics are marginalized and avoided and shut down when they express doubt, rather than being shown the compelling evidence for the veracity of the claim, then it means the claim is false. It's that simple.
UseYerEFFINBrain 1 week ago
@UseYerEFFINBrain Your statement is very stupidly false and a complete waste of words. The truth is still the truth, whether or not skeptics are convinced. In EVERY INSTANCE IN THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD the skeptics have ALWAYS been proven wrong eventually. But they have ALWAYS been the initial persecutors of those who tried to show the truth, only to run away like cowards when the skeptics are the ones shown to be damned braindead. So use your effin brain before it rots away.
govahnator 1 week ago
"In EVERY INSTANCE IN THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD the skeptics have ALWAYS been proven wrong eventually" Oh, I see. So Santa is actually real? Bigfoot real? The moon is made of cheese? There are alligators in NYC's sewers? It's confirmed that black cats bring bad luck? Zombies exist? Women who fly on broomsticks exist?
Oh ok. Let's not be skeptical, because all these things are real!
UseYerEFFINBrain 1 week ago
If you had something tangible to prove your belief in aliens is true, you'd be providing evidence, NOT providing excuses for the lack of evidence.
UseYerEFFINBrain 1 week ago
@govahnator " In EVERY INSTANCE IN THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD the skeptics have ALWAYS been proven wrong eventually" came straight from your arse.Skeptics believed in a heliocentric universe, that earth might not be flat, that diseases might not be god's vengeance on humanity.And they were right.Like that grumpy old schmuck you have huge claims and no evidence, go back to some loony UFO blog, youl find safety in numbers there.
sushanalone 1 week ago
@sushanalone *heliocentric planetary system, not universe.
sushanalone 1 week ago
I would say that it's extraordinary to claim that a box made of little more than plastic, metal, and a little silicon, with no moving parts, and the size of two matchboxes, allows me to fling birds at castles made by green pigs on a high-resolution, touch-responsive screen. And yet, this object (known as an iPod touch or basically any smartphone) clearly exists; moreover, I don't believe that it requires an extraordinary amount of proof.
TheVerandaguy 1 week ago
Larry King always had a lot more respect than was warranted. He had another show where he had those cold-talking, bereaved-hustling scumbags like John Edward 'argue' their side; what side? Much like this; there's a reason Bill Nye is outnumbered 5-to-1 here. Quality vs. quantity, and a phony attempt to sell us provocative television
MrJercules 1 week ago
The title means bill is the pwn'er not the pwn'e lol. Bill wins for sure. These guys feel threatened by his knowledge
JR113FTW 2 weeks ago 2
Billy Nye didn't get 'pwned' at all. Larry King continuously allowed the other speakers to interrupt him.
TubsMcLard 2 weeks ago 2
Bill Nye is the only respectable guy on here. The others are nothing but a bunch of ignorance people. Bill Nye was trying to say their side, will the others just attacked to him. Just because we don't understand what we are seeing, doesn't mean that it is what we want it to be.
bradmichrich 2 weeks ago 2
This is pure idiocy. Bob Jacobs was the one throwing around ad hominem arguments, not Bill Nye. I am quite honestly disgusted by his behavior.
FLAMMABLEsquids 2 weeks ago 2
Bob Jacobs is an infantile, ill mannered jerk.
mcmanustony 2 weeks ago
Bill Nye brought up some excellent points. I'm not sure how he could have gotten pwned in any of this, his response was entirely scientific.
mrnevernice 2 weeks ago
When the neckbeard accused Nye of ad hominem - and falsely at that! - he just completely destroyed what little credibility he had left at that point.
Halopedian 2 weeks ago
Only an illogical person would think Bill Nye got "pwned" here.
NolaDood 2 weeks ago
This guy has issues. Major Issues.
Jallandhara 2 weeks ago
ROFL!!! WHAT IF THE GUY SAID "HEY PUSSY, LISTEN" AT 6:50
hubbleslaw 2 weeks ago
Idiots these days who see a light in the sky and instantly think its aliens... Get a grip people. And Nye does not get pwned in this, he simply puts forward logical ideas and perspectives which are ignored by the ignorant, all because 'they saw something', or 'heard something from *this guy* ' and so on....
ADEdge 2 weeks ago
to me it looks like Nye does the pwning...
science > emotion
Subie1337 2 weeks ago 2
@link090909 i agree with you.
Panda6781 2 weeks ago
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHA bill you deserve it you douche. Man i used to think you were cool. God your such a douche.
netlizard 2 weeks ago
I love bill nye
mtdewdragon 2 weeks ago
can you believe Bill Nye used to be a Navy SEAL?
ruizj2006 2 weeks ago
@ruizj2006 Nope, mostly because he never was.
ReclaimXmas 2 weeks ago
@ruizj2006 Wtf? You've been misinformed.
Gearsdisraeli 2 weeks ago
@Gearsdisraeli Where did you hear that he was a navy seal. I'd like to know.
austing12 2 weeks ago
@austing12 ? I never said he was, jackass. lmao!
Gearsdisraeli 2 weeks ago
@Gearsdisraeli sorry thought you were ruizj2006
austing12 2 weeks ago
plasma beam? LOL who is this guy?
OwensTV 2 weeks ago
Yeah fuck all of those guys. Bill is in the right.
JumpCheckProductions 2 weeks ago 35
i totally LOL'd at the vinegar and baking soda joke WOW
Sagr1987 2 weeks ago
Bob Jacob's antagonism didn't do him any favours here. The same could be said for the other guys laughing like school children at petty insults. Poor form.
cobloaf1 2 weeks ago
I could remake that video on adobe flash.
Noise509 2 weeks ago
Hold on there Mr. Comedian... Haw haw...
Webmonkey78 2 weeks ago
this is a joke, Bill Nye rocks and the rest are a bunch of fucking dolts. why don't we see some proof?
link090909 2 weeks ago
lol im not saying it was aliens but it was nt us so it was aliens
EatpieUTUBE 2 weeks ago
I just lost a lot of respect for larry King
blackcreekghost 2 weeks ago
BILL NYE OWNS ALL.a
xBennyx34 2 weeks ago
Fact is that nobody saw anything anywhere else than on the tape/film. The ufo-freak is a nut-case: )
winterstellar 2 weeks ago
What I hate is they guy said that it appeared to be a plasma bolt. What is he doing on to believe that it was truly a plasma bolt? They had nothing to test that it was a plasma bolt. Fact is no one knows what it was and that is all that we can say.
fourtrees44 2 weeks ago
the guy who was insulting Bill Nye is a butthurt faggot.
hunterkiller885 2 weeks ago
Nothing will be resolved until we see the actual footage and obviously it's been made clear that'll never happen. I think it's always funny how the scientific community, backed by the government, spends millions and billions to find other life forms in the universe. Yet are always accused of "covering up" when such life forms are found. The point that Nye was making is without the actual footage for everyone to see, we can't make any conclusions.A crazy idea can't be proven only with hearsay.
Klinkerklunk 2 weeks ago
lol I mean Bill Nye beat them so easily.
JeffGeigercr 2 weeks ago
this is the least clever title for a video i have ever seen
Stead3111 2 weeks ago
are you gonna do this with baking soda Bill? ahahaha asshole :P
Kennethp12 2 weeks ago
where is the film?
equallyeasilyfuqyou 2 weeks ago
Seems Jacobs got hung up because he thought Nye was calling him a lair. After the name calling and insulting, he lost me. Why? Why do you need to react to something like that if you know that you're lying and etc? If you know you're not lying and other person is false, stay calm, let your words (not your face/actions) speak for themselves.
This actually seems like classroom antics to me. Group of people rag on one person who contradicts them. Sad to see this continue.
protoman111 3 weeks ago 2
that ended too quick, it didn't give bill nye a chance at explaining what wanted to.
gened216 3 weeks ago 3
Bill Nye the denial guy.
lockedine 3 weeks ago
its astonishing how many complete fucking retards are in positions of power
JaCkMiChEaLs0n 3 weeks ago 3