Why am I getting only part 1 ? The one with Mitchum. I did see it in 1962, and it was far better than the remake with DeNiro being as disgusting, and filthy as possible. I love the guy but I prefer Mitchum and Peck. Mitchum was made for the role. I met his brother, and he said "Bob is the sweetest, kindest man I know.," Hard to believe. lol
I think the reason that most people now prefer the newer one is because that they were able to show more violence, be more explicit with it than in the '60s. There were probably a lot of scenes they had to improvise with on, because of the censors. Obviously this would be very scary to a young person in the '60s since they are not used to such violence on film. But I like Gregory Peck, he's an amazing actor and a real gentlemen...or so I've heard. Shame he died.
@VirgiliaCoriolanus There were many very violent films throughout the 60's. It was a very extreme and volatile time both on and off screen. This film chose to be more artist in it's depictions of brutality and not simply go for the sensational/graphic. And for that it is a much more engrossing and successful film.
@rbuss1956 he is saying with the 20 that he can buy her for that - he makes her feel cheap and dirty - just what that sort of pig of a man likes doing
both pretty good movies. i like de niro's cady better for a bunch of reasons. plus, i think its kinda funny that the first thing they do to inroduce him as a villain in this movie is to have him not help a lady pick up her book lol
Great film. Heavily cut on its release in the UK by the censors, considered pretty violent for it's time. Peck and Mitchum are perfectly cast in this.
@thelupoistheman1 "The acting" in he original,by Hollywood Royalty,can not even be argued,to do so would be to make your statement credible,instead of foolish.You can not compare apples to oranges,they both stand alone in their class.
@Bebe7077 Remakes always have a bad time. Iam sure they were aware of it in 1992. Its an age thing, if you see the 60s version first then that becomes the best.
@mcwolfus - What a ridiculous thing to say,and think.Well maybe to you it's a habit. I saw the Original Godzilla,FIRST.........But the later Godzilla with Broderic Crawford,was far better.....????????
@billy1212ist Whats ridiculous? What habit??Generally a remake of a very sucessful film will be judged partly based on a comparison with the original. Your experience was different, and that is your experience.
Imagine how sensational and shocking that Twenty Dollar Bill scene would have been in 1962! It really establishes Max Cady as someone unspeakably depraved.
I think both the remake and the original were excellent films. Terrific acting, beautiful cinematography, outstanding music from Bernard Herrmann and both Mitchum and DeNiro were equally fantastic as the antagonist Max Cady. Peck, however, is the much better Sam Bowden than Nick Nolte.
@thelupoistheman1 Agreed..not sure why I be seeing hate for the remake...its one of the few remakes that are as good or better than their original films.
This is a GREAT Film! Gregory Peck could only see Mitchum in the role. Mitchum said he did not want to do it; that is until Peck sent him the script and a large bottle of whiskey. By the time he finished both, he was in.
Peck knew that Mitchum was the only actor that could be as quietly menacing as he is in this film. Polly Bergen admitted to being scared out of her mind, by Mitchum in the houseboat scene. That is why it looks so real. It was real fear. One take. Cut. Print. Love it!
2:54 "Come close to discuss it more privately" and then starts the shady hush-hush...
The system boasts with what is supposed to be the openness of a public trial and at the same time nobody is bothered by the practice of "more private discussions" between judges and lawyers. Very "opened" really...
@xxxSelenagomezfanxx Don`t be surprised by the fact about "1000 for the old-70 000 for the new". It would be more surprising if it was the opposite. Isn`t it logical that the quality viewers will be a way less than the average ho-hum blockbuster movie goers?
@tyzhen This my remark, however, concerns my different attitude to the old and the new film-making only in principle, without specific relation to that movie here.
As for "Cape Fear" I think not only the remake, but even the original is "too much ado for nothing" - except for Robert Mitchum`s part.
Both the 1962 and the 1991 versions are cliche-ridden, conformist, simplistic "good vs evil" story that says nothing worthy or new ; and in many aspects even tastes more of schmaltz than of fear.
same courtroom/ house used in To Kill A Mockingbird lol
dreamcaster4eva2011 1 month ago
oh my goodness, thank you for uploading this.
dreamcaster4eva2011 1 month ago
To everyone here: OF COURSE Mitchum is great in his role. He played Reverend Powell in Night of the Hunter. He was great in both roles
byranntherockstar1 1 month ago
Why am I getting only part 1 ? The one with Mitchum. I did see it in 1962, and it was far better than the remake with DeNiro being as disgusting, and filthy as possible. I love the guy but I prefer Mitchum and Peck. Mitchum was made for the role. I met his brother, and he said "Bob is the sweetest, kindest man I know.," Hard to believe. lol
HeatherGlen33 1 month ago
I think the reason that most people now prefer the newer one is because that they were able to show more violence, be more explicit with it than in the '60s. There were probably a lot of scenes they had to improvise with on, because of the censors. Obviously this would be very scary to a young person in the '60s since they are not used to such violence on film. But I like Gregory Peck, he's an amazing actor and a real gentlemen...or so I've heard. Shame he died.
VirgiliaCoriolanus 2 months ago
@VirgiliaCoriolanus There were many very violent films throughout the 60's. It was a very extreme and volatile time both on and off screen. This film chose to be more artist in it's depictions of brutality and not simply go for the sensational/graphic. And for that it is a much more engrossing and successful film.
3investigators 1 month ago
Classic movie, classic score and classic Robert Mitchum....pure dirtbag! He walks right by the lady without helping her when she drops her book.
peppersax 3 months ago
mitchum plays auch a great psychopath.
gwynneveireland 3 months ago
No one should be let out of jail for rape, especially child rape. May they rot in hell.
goombabear 3 months ago 2
Comment removed
goombabear 3 months ago
I would say that De Niro's character in cape fear is so brutal and rough
nora263 3 months ago
many thanks for posting this wonderful movie!
de niro's cape fear ia also a good one, but this is even better and is really worth watching
nora263 3 months ago
im sorry but u cant do any better than these guys and the music is great too!
elvispresley718 4 months ago
If someone could explain the twenty dollar bill (bad, it seems) joke... i may not be the only one who doesn't get it.
rbuss1956 5 months ago in playlist More videos from WYouBee21
@rbuss1956 Though she is married he is bribing her to sleep with him for a $20 spot...Da creep :)
clintbronson5 3 months ago
@rbuss1956 he is saying with the 20 that he can buy her for that - he makes her feel cheap and dirty - just what that sort of pig of a man likes doing
chelseacool100 2 months ago
There's something so cool about Robert Mitchum!
KatsuDe 5 months ago
7:32
his laugh is priceless -
MoveOverCasanova 6 months ago
thanks soo much for posting!awesome quality :D
dramaqueen22964 7 months ago in playlist Cape Fear 1962
Only the good guys can be that bad....robert mitchum=creeper!!!!
dramaqueen22964 7 months ago in playlist Cape Fear 1962
1991 version is the best ! De Niro is just outstanding !!!
cpmafia 7 months ago
love mitchum...thanks!!!
flipside1545 8 months ago
wow. thanks a lot.
Madarekourosh 8 months ago
Both versions are brilliant. can't decide.
mcwolfus 8 months ago
Robert Mitchum always oozes confidence. Prefer him as the goodie tho cos he was a good guy in real life so it imo suited him.
EloiseDecember 8 months ago
You gotta love the look on the waitress' face when Mitchum hands her the cash ^_^
swinetastic 9 months ago
It's funny, that Mitchum never looks angry in this movie. He always does impressions of a potthead :)
fdsffdd 9 months ago
both pretty good movies. i like de niro's cady better for a bunch of reasons. plus, i think its kinda funny that the first thing they do to inroduce him as a villain in this movie is to have him not help a lady pick up her book lol
williamrafe1 9 months ago
is that girl just very short and young and he's tall?
goldenfilly 9 months ago
Great film. Heavily cut on its release in the UK by the censors, considered pretty violent for it's time. Peck and Mitchum are perfectly cast in this.
richievegas01 10 months ago
The remake was good, but for some reason, I much prefer the original.
yiotispan 10 months ago
Love this version! The remake is good too though.
MsLostWoods 1 year ago
A masterpiece of 1962. So much better than the '90s remake!
Gregory is so handsome that leaves me breathless and Robert is the best Cady we could ever have.
Bebe7077 1 year ago 29
@Bebe7077 amen. not to mention herrmanns brilliant score.
lonnegan4 11 months ago
Robert Mitchum is the only one acting in this movie. The rest just deliver their lines with a fucking stone-face.
BigDog91527 9 months ago
@BigDog91527,
Yeah, but Peck is still one of the greatests. But the acting in the remake was superior to the original.
thelupoistheman1 8 months ago
@thelupoistheman1 "The acting" in he original,by Hollywood Royalty,can not even be argued,to do so would be to make your statement credible,instead of foolish.You can not compare apples to oranges,they both stand alone in their class.
billy1212ist 6 months ago
@Bebe7077 Remakes always have a bad time. Iam sure they were aware of it in 1992. Its an age thing, if you see the 60s version first then that becomes the best.
mcwolfus 8 months ago
@mcwolfus - What a ridiculous thing to say,and think.Well maybe to you it's a habit. I saw the Original Godzilla,FIRST.........But the later Godzilla with Broderic Crawford,was far better.....????????
billy1212ist 6 months ago
@billy1212ist Whats ridiculous? What habit??Generally a remake of a very sucessful film will be judged partly based on a comparison with the original. Your experience was different, and that is your experience.
mcwolfus 6 months ago
[iminent=BdBRn7YVffOB] @billy1212ist raymond burr dumass
eddiewilson11 6 months ago
@Bebe7077 which robert?
kingcaesar5 7 months ago
@kingcaesar5
Robert Mitchum, of course!
Bebe7077 7 months ago
Robert Mitchum and Gregory Peck, two of the greatest film actors of all time.
JohnBoy918 1 year ago
Robert Mitchum <3 <3 <3 <3 <3
WolfQueene 1 year ago
Imagine how sensational and shocking that Twenty Dollar Bill scene would have been in 1962! It really establishes Max Cady as someone unspeakably depraved.
megaswenson 1 year ago 3
I think both the remake and the original were excellent films. Terrific acting, beautiful cinematography, outstanding music from Bernard Herrmann and both Mitchum and DeNiro were equally fantastic as the antagonist Max Cady. Peck, however, is the much better Sam Bowden than Nick Nolte.
thelupoistheman1 1 year ago
I thought both were really superior films but for entirely different reasons. Scorcese's
because of the visuals and cinemetography. This because of the straightforward story and Gregory Peck.
alexalex3131 1 year ago
original vs remake arguments aside, the star of both films is composer Bernard Herrmann
gammacurve 1 year ago 21
@gammacurve,
Both are terrific films.
thelupoistheman1 1 year ago
@thelupoistheman1 Agreed..not sure why I be seeing hate for the remake...its one of the few remakes that are as good or better than their original films.
mrjonz72 11 months ago
@gammacurve Well said.
Mrsilenciobackgammon 10 months ago
This is a GREAT Film! Gregory Peck could only see Mitchum in the role. Mitchum said he did not want to do it; that is until Peck sent him the script and a large bottle of whiskey. By the time he finished both, he was in.
Peck knew that Mitchum was the only actor that could be as quietly menacing as he is in this film. Polly Bergen admitted to being scared out of her mind, by Mitchum in the houseboat scene. That is why it looks so real. It was real fear. One take. Cut. Print. Love it!
peng1965a 1 year ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
I think the music of this movie is scarier than any of Hitchicok's films' that Bernard Herrmann composed except "Psycho".
Very great movie !!
arukidase 1 year ago
Comment removed
arukidase 1 year ago
Genius music. One of my all time favorite scores. Love Fantomas' rendition of it.
b1tbomb 1 year ago
@b1tbomb It sounds so much like the Sideshow Bob theme from The Simpsons. I know they did an episode based on this film.
queenrocks21 1 year ago
2:54 "Come close to discuss it more privately" and then starts the shady hush-hush...
The system boasts with what is supposed to be the openness of a public trial and at the same time nobody is bothered by the practice of "more private discussions" between judges and lawyers. Very "opened" really...
tyzhen 1 year ago
I love how the 1962 one has 1000 views, and the 1991 has 70,000. Yet this one is 1000000000000000 times better!
xxxSelenagomezfanxx 1 year ago 3
@xxxSelenagomezfanxx Don`t be surprised by the fact about "1000 for the old-70 000 for the new". It would be more surprising if it was the opposite. Isn`t it logical that the quality viewers will be a way less than the average ho-hum blockbuster movie goers?
tyzhen 1 year ago
@tyzhen This my remark, however, concerns my different attitude to the old and the new film-making only in principle, without specific relation to that movie here.
As for "Cape Fear" I think not only the remake, but even the original is "too much ado for nothing" - except for Robert Mitchum`s part.
Both the 1962 and the 1991 versions are cliche-ridden, conformist, simplistic "good vs evil" story that says nothing worthy or new ; and in many aspects even tastes more of schmaltz than of fear.
tyzhen 1 year ago
@tyzhen I know. Thats just my opinion that this one is better. I understand what you are trying to say though.
xxxSelenagomezfanxx 1 year ago
Thank you WYoubee21 very much for sharing.
MBRAGGS 1 year ago 2
Thanks a lot
JensVII 1 year ago
GREG is supreme but mitchum isn't good
atticus26 1 year ago
@atticus26
Disagree, I think Mitchum is absolutely brilliant, menacing all the way throughout the film. You could not get a more believable bad guy.
badgerfaye 1 year ago
@badgerfaye charlie chaplin
titusville4life 1 year ago
@titusville4life
What a great compliment for Mitchum, to be compared with a great actor like Charlie Chaplin. Mitchum would have been delighted!
badgerfaye 1 year ago
@badgerfaye think about it no one could be more scary then Charlie Chaplin
titusville4life 1 year ago
Oh my goodness! Thank you so much! Everytime I go to purchase this movie it's always the cruddy remake! Thank you thank you thank you!
narthic 1 year ago 2
Thanx for putting this up. Just watched the re-make and thought it was good. Wanted to see how this one was.
HeartaVilleGram 1 year ago
why so many little views
leemeires 1 year ago