The most important point in the whole Pentagon arguement is: Wheres the beef?? Wheres the video tape showing ANY aircraft flying into, over , or even nearby the Pentagon on 9/11? You see, if they had it, they would have shown it. Officers, and enlisted stood around at the pentagon that day, it total dis-belief, that their govt. would kill innocent lives, and some of their personal friends and comrades in arms. The US govt would kill its own soldiers to gain control of the whole world.
@nongratis1 You don't need a video showing the plane crashing to know it crashed there. What about the wreckage on the Pentagon lawn. What about the stench of jet fuel many staff talked about? What about the 130+ eye witnesses who all saw a plane. Not one person reported seeing a missile or anything other than a jet plane! You really are an idiot to believe AA77 didn't crash at the Pentagon.
What I do find interesting about all the 2nd plane hitting footage, is that in almost all of it, it starts off zoomed in, and zooms out just as the plane shows up...even in the amateur videos. Some of those videos do seem very suspect to me for some reason. I'm not saying there weren't planes, I believe there were...just something I noticed from watching almost all the 2nd plane hitting videos.
Truthers are without doubt the most retarded people on the planet. And nongratis1's comments below prove that beyond all doubt. May I suggest to you that you seek out RKOwens4's channel on here. He debunks every single one of the twoof movements pathetic lies.
I would suggest to people to go to September Clues, or Scholars for 9/11 truth, In Plane Site is one that someelse has suggested to watch. I'm still watching these vids for more info.
Notice at 2:45 the ex-government hacker sitting in the middle gets real nervous when Ace says the line "nose-out", and "zoom in". All the sudden his ass begins the pucker factor as he contimplates an answer to the most feared of all mistakes made on 9/11 that shows clear video forgery.
@nongratis1 Clear video forgery would be differences in the footage shown in this video, vs video shown from the MANY other networks, and amatuer footage. I don't see Baker ever making an attempt to show anomolies that appear in one video, but not in another. The idea that there were no planes in NYC is the most retarded of all truther theories.
@eaglejoe8 That exactly the case here. In one BBC video that day they used a skewed view of the towers, and in the CNN video from the same vantage point, the shot appeared to have altered, fore-ground, and back ground. The amatuer vids had unbelievable ability to hold steady on a 500 mph aircraft without any giggle or distortion. The 175 aircraft shot appears to disapear completely into the tower, not one thing falls off or breaks away at impact. Thats impossible, video fakery.
@nongratis1 Amatuer video being steady is not that shocking if it's attatched to a steady tripod. And a hurricane force wind can drive something like a pencil through a telephone pole, so a plane going into a building made of lightweight steel and glass is not shocking at all, nor impossible. NYC doesn't exactly have a sparce population, and this happened early enough in the morning that many people were on their way to work and saw it. Where are the people who claim there was no plane?
@eaglejoe8 So the amatuer videographer was didy-bopping down the ave one early morning with his camera and tripod when he just happened to get a 6th sense that it was time to set the tripod and get ready to film the crime of the new century.
The twin towers were intentionally built to withstand crashes from jet airliners, so stated the original architects. The video fakery seen is only explainable by saying, Video Fakery intended to deceive.
@nongratis1 No, amatuers were filming because tower 1 had already been hit. It had already become a major story on every news network. As for the towers, Les Robertson said the assumption of a plane hitting the towers was based on a plane traveling at low speed, likely lost in a fog, and with low fuel. He also admitted they did not take the fires caused by the jet fuel into account. I suppose you think the hundreds of witnesses to both crashes were planted? Plane parts were planted too?
@eaglejoe8 There were no plane parts found at the Pentagon, WTC, or even Shanksville for that matter. At least no parts found from a AA Boeing 757 or 767. The plane #175 was supposedly flying at 500 mph when it decended, and turned into the WTC tower. Flight #11 supposedly did a 190 degree turn as it supposedly flew into the Pentagon. All which are impossible if your a non flying boxcutter terrorist, that hasnt any time in a jet airliner cockpit.
@nongratis1 Uh, there were plane parts at all 3 sites. You are simply wrong there. 95% of the plane in Shanksville was recovered. A simple Google search will show you plane debris from all 3 sites.
@eaglejoe8 The only truthful thing you just wrote is, "Uh'. There was a smatering of fuselage debris from an unkown plane, evidently a very small craft. The eingines of a Boeing 767 or 757, are 9 feet by 12 feet in dimensions. Where did those engines disapear of to? None were found at the Pentagon, or at the WTC, or at Shanksville. Its a sad joke played upon the American people on 9/11. It was a farce and a lie, Missles were used at the WTC and the Pentagon without question.
@nongratis1 Engines and/or engine parts were found in all 3 locations. You're wrong again. Missle parts found, and eyewitnesses to missles in any location, are zero.
@eaglejoe8 Have you been smoking dope? Parts of a Global hawk have been reported found at the Pentagaon, yes thats true, becuase they had 12 men carry a covered object from the building and hide it under a tarp. The remains of 1 jet engine the size of a Global hawk was photographed on the ground just outside of the Pentagon, otherwise no engines were ever found at any of the locations. Maybe that what you thought you saw, common mistake with folks that dont know the difference in the two.
@nongratis1 Global Hawk? That's hilarious. The "tarp" they were carrying was a tent you moron. Nothing from a Global Hawk was ever found, that is a complete lie. An engine also landed on one of the NYC streets, and an engine was found in the crater in Shanksville, and the other 300 yards from the crash site. Pictures of all except the engine 300 yards away are found with a simple Google search.
@eaglejoe8 Your either an idiot, a govt troll-puss. No engines other than a global hawk sized engine was found and a picture caught it before they covered it up. Busted. Men did carry an object away that was covered by a tarp, and it obvious that if it were aircraft fuselage, they would have let the world see it. Since it was "covered up", its clear that it was parts of a global hawk or something damning to their claims, busted again. Keep em coming, son.
@nongratis1 Then why do all known pics of engine parts at the Pentagon match up to diagrams of the RB211-535 equiped on FL77? It's ok, I know you can't answer. You think no planes hit the towers, which shows how incredibly stupid you really are.
@eaglejoe8 You are a grade A dumbass. Listen, The engines of Boeing jet Airliners are 7.5 feet by 12.5 feet in deminsions These Pratt Whitney jet engines of the 757's are a little over half the width of the entire jet itself. Their huge engines. NOT like the tiny little engine that is the only one seen in the Pentagon photos. The little engine in the Pent. photo, is only 2 feet by 5 feet in dem. So your little theory is busted again. Come back when you've study and bring your shoe shine box.
@nongratis1 The Boeing hit a steel reinforced, blast proof wall at @500mph and you seriously expect to see the engines intact? Why don't you go and ask an air crash investigator for his professional opinion as what the state of the Boeing would be after a crash like that.
The stupidity and gullibility of truthers never ceases to amaze me.
@terrymanning1 No need to ask anyone that answers to the federal govt. After the Flt TWA 800 and recent others, the NSTB has lost their credibility as well. Sad to say, but its on the FEDS payroll, then dont bother to ask. You'll have to fill out the request in triplicate, and wait 3 years for a response. The Feds know that its all come unravelled and it no doubt shakes them up.
@nongratis1 Ask an air crash investigator from another country then if you don't trust the US NTSB. Why is it you truther idiots think there would be a bloody great chunk of plane stuck out the side of the building? This isn't a cartoon you moron, it's reality.
@terrymanning1 Your other channel, eagleshits, what a laugh. Big junks from a 757 Boing Jet airliner, with two massive engines, and you say JUNKS, YEAH exactly so take both of your channels and go back to reallty TV bevis and butthead. Thats a good name for both of your channels Terry BEVIS, and Eagleshits BUTTHEAD. Go home you have nothing more to say you've been punked too many times.
@nongratis1 First off moron, FL77 used Rolls Royce engines, not Pratt and Whitney. Second, the photo in question is NOT an engine, it's an engine PART. A part that matches perfectly in size to a disk hub. Not every component is the same size as the outer fan.
@eaglejoe8 Wrong dipshit, the 757 use Pratt and Whitney. The photo clearly ESPOSES the fraud in the "Socalled" Pentagon crash site. Most important point is: Wheres the rest of the engine? Where did the largest part of the Jet run off to? You see the inconsistency and lying, and the deception in the flt #77 hoax? Busted again.
The official version is so full of holes it looks like swiss cheese. Hah.
@nongratis1 They were Rolls Royce engines asshole. Pratt and Whitney themselves directed Chris Bollan from the AFP towards RR when he was "investigating". It's a no wonder you are such a fucking idiot. You can't even get the basic facts right.
@eaglejoe8 Did your mother drop you when your were a child, or is the simply fact your still a child? Trying to debate a truthtard such as yourself is like talking with a gold fish. I would expect about as much from a shillster punk. When you lose the arguement then you rant cuss, and cry all the home. Your out of your league, so go have a good cry and suck on your mommas tity.
@nongratis1 I haven't lost any argument. Fl77 used Rolls Royce engines, not Pratt and Whitney. That is an undebatable fact. I have nothing to cry over, because I am right about everything I've said. Meanwhile, the truth movement is still spinning their wheels with claims that in 10 years have all been proven false. Be proud of the loser organization you associate yourself with.
Its strange in how there are so many vids like this that disperately try to discredit the video fakery. If it was so bogus, then why are there so many vids just like this one with the same shill hackers, trying to shoot the facts down. I think the feds are scared that this thing will come out fully in the light, and people will rise up. Otherwise it wouldnt even be such a topic at all. I think theres something to this no plane theory, NOW I have to go back and watch it all again.
I find it interesting, that Baker claims they had enough time in real time, to slow the frames down so that the "nose" didn't pop out when Wright's simulation showed it would, but they somehow didn't have enough time to eliminate the "nose" popping out all together.
@eaglejoe8 thats a good point. They couldnt eliminate the nose coming thru the tower, but it was too late. they must of had a last minute call to simulate this footage and quick the gig is on. I wonder if they were waiting on something or if was a last minute plan to go into effect.
Go to the Harley T shirt guy video. to see the absolutely absurd supposed eyewitness account of a rehearsed prestaged set up of eyewitnesses.
Its laughable to think that the govt would think that people would be that stupid to go for the sack of lack of talent they used to prop up the notion of intense heat, cuz of jet fuel burning. Oh and that brought down the twin towers, jet fuel burning? LOL My aching sides on that lie. What a prop wash job for the gullible fools to believe.
@paskettle So was the "Harley guy" the only person interviewed on 9/11? No. And the guy was pretty much correct in that fires combined with the damage and fire proofing blown off IS what brought the towers down. There is no evidence of bombs or a demo or thermite or any other hare brained BS you truther morons dream up.
9/11 happened exactly as the official accounts say and nothing the retards of 9/11 truth bleat on about is real, and especially not the no-planer minority.
@terrymanning1 You remind me a child throwing a temper tantrum. Nothing you say, whaaaaa, I'll hold my breath whaaaaa.
You make me laugh my son. The truth will prevail one day, and I hope you have a special seat assigned to you on the fema train. No matter how much ass you kiss, you'll never get on thier good side, you'll never really be used by the govt. I hate to burst your bubble, butt sometimes the truth hurts, then it heals the lame and brokenhearted.
@terrymanning1 Wow, are you in kindergarten? Only someone who is trying to cover up a lie gets mad and blocks people who disagree with them. If you have the truth on your side there should be nothing to be afraid of.
@paskettle Brainwashed "Son".....you people are nothing but paranoid cult followers, who love to jump on the crazy train for truth, none of you can think for yourselves....bow and kneel to King Alex, us sheeple will never know the wisdom of your majesty and we will all burn in hell, while you noble ones will thrive and prevail threw the tyranny and injustice of the NEW WORLD ORDER!!!! Ohhhhh my Soul....please save me, brother!!!! Now thats a REAL TEMPER TANTRUM, EH???!!!!
Ace is 100% correct when we see the nose out of the supposed plane. Now how in the good hell would the nose of the plane still be in tact if it had just crashed through the tower. Its a virtual impossiblity. Anyone that can watch that footage and still believe it to be true is a either a fool, or just a dupe. Thats a video forgery without question. Its starting to look like the govt has lied on all counts about 9/11 except the fact that some force did attack America on 9/11.
@paskettle The shape seen is an optical illusion created by the low quality lens videoing it. Plenty of other angles show debris flying from the tower, not the actual nose of the aircraft! Truthers are soooo dumb!
@terrymanning1 Optical illusion is the whole of the video. It was a fake video made by ametuer cinematography forgers. I understand that you have no expertise or ability to process this information.
You live on a elemental level. Go to the September CLues videos. That will help you begin to understand at the elemetary level. After time your little mouth will hang open, try not to drool while this process begins.
@paskettle Right so what you're saying is that every single shot of a plane hitting the tower is fake. That every single person in New York who saw the planes is lying or under some kind of mass delusion. Ok buddy. Keep drinking the kool aid. Idiot.
@terrymanning1 Some people did see a craft but it was not a jet airliner. Most of them people were still in shock. This was a first for 99 % of the people present that day. They saw a missle, projectile, not a plane.
The foggy misty non glaring picture used in the faked videos is a photo shop forgery. Ametuerish at best, and they are busted for such an feebile attempt. One reporter watching at the time stated She hadnt seen any plane, but the achorman in the studio did see something??
@paskettle (Ace Baker under yet another name) How do you explain plane wreckage on the tops of buildings below the towers and at street level? How do you explain how countless amateur pictures and video showed a large passenger jet? Until you can you have nothing Ace and everyone knows it. Give it up.
@terrymanning1 Where are these supposed pictures, I havent seen any of them. Where are they? Prove your point. There was no wreckage of any plane at the Pentagon or the WTC. No wreckage found in Shanksville Pa either. Weres the proof? Thats the point, exactly thank you for pointing that fact out. There were no black boxes, there were no bodies found at Shanksville Pa. and the Pentagon. Where are the engines. The engines were 9 feet by 12 feet in size. Where are they?
@paskettle Look Ace go get yourself some medical care ok. You're clearly delusional as Ron Wieck told you. There are countless images of plane wreckage at all the crash sites as you very well know. These haven't been faked or any other dumbass shit you believe. Go talk to the coroners who picked up body parts and identified them. And the onus of proof is on you if you think the official accounts are lies. Now stop posting on my vids and get help.
@terrymanning1 IF cant stand the heat then run, and get the hell out of the kitchen. I can only debate with adults that have a capacity to think and balance information. Your a child nibbling on cookies, stopping by the window for a second becuase the pretty colors atracted you. Go home and sit this one out my son.
@paskettle What the fuck are you waffling on about Ace? I've looked at the no-planer's views and all you're doing is highlighting a couple of anomalies that have been clearly explained as being down to either the limitations of the videotape or the camera/lens. When other factors come into play like the thousands of eye witnesses, personal camcorder footage showing planes, the plane wreckage found etc your views become the idiotic fantasy of a deluded moron. Which sums you up nicely.
@terrymanning1 Your a simple dude, I cant do anymore than expose the fraud. When you watch the saturday morning cartoons, do you really believe what you see is real? I hope Im not arguing with just a child here.
Theres hope in learning. There was no wreckage found at the Pentagon. Not of any Boeing passenger airliner. Not at shanksville. NONE what so ever. Just a few pre-staged out of work actors were used as supposed eyewitness like ol Mark. " Due to intense heat", blah blah
@paskettle no you did not "upset me by words directed towards someone else" you annoy me with the bullshit claims you are spewing out that there were no planes. You disprespectful pile of shit. People died on those planes and you are a pile of shit to claim they did not exist or were some way involved. You are a worthless piece of shit to make that claim. And blocking me ahahaha you fucking loser
@paskettle Poor Ace, you got yourself completely destroyed on Hardfire and you still haven't figured out how to learn anything or in lieu of that, shutting your face.
@paskettle "There was no wreckage found at the Pentagon."
That's just an absolute lie, and only the most ignorant and helpless person would believe that when a quick google search easily proves it wrong. You're a pathetic liar and you only serve to spread lies and ignorance. Great job!
In 2001 PVI which is now Sportvision - PVI, was not as sophisticated as it is today. Simple 3D wireframe is constructed on a 2D camera shot. In 2001. 3 cameras had to be mapped by 3 separate wireframes on which to construct lines for yellow line. In 2001 it was not as easy as it is today but virtual lines for virtual paths of animated icons can be constructed on any camera shot. for any vitual animation. No masks are needed the animation is mapped on color. See Sportvision for latest PVI videos.
Ace!! check yourself in to a mental facility.. TODAY!! Uh..your "expert" analysis and green screen expertise is nothing but allot of silly nonsense. Tell Brian Clark that the wing tip impaled in his office ceiling really is not there. Tell the Asian lady that was very nearly killed when U175's left wing came through the sky lobby she was in.. never really took place.
I believe there were planes. However, this theory is totally plausible. I really haven't seen anyone prove the theory is implausible. Just name calling like "retard" "dildo"
"twoofer" etc. Grow up people. Good luck getting Bin Laden. For 10 years you thought the USA was on the hunt for him. They are not, never were and never will. FBI says he had nothing to do with 9/11.
@terrymanning1 So when has CGI generated footage become truth? None of the footage could be used in court because it is CGI. As for stooge Wieck, does he ever stop depending on hearsay?
@mujaku Try telling the families of those who died on the planes that their loved ones died in CGI planes. Or try telling the thousands of New York citizens who saw the planes that their eyes were deceiving them. Or try telling the clean up crews who found aircraft wreckage that they were mistaken.
You no planers are the most retarded fringe group of the twoof movement. You're ignored for the idiots you are and rightly so.
@terrymanning1 Well if they were CGI planes in the videos, the theory suggest without saying that there were no people flying into the buildings as it suggest no planes at all flew into the buildings.So theoretically, the families of those who died on the planes would therefore not exist.
Last time I checked, CGI Generated footage doesn't spread 30 TONS of debris all over manhattan, nor does it drop a Flight 11 NoseWheel on a 50 year old woman, crushing her legs, nor does it drop an engine on West street, outside the offices of the Structural Engineers of NYC, where the engineers who built the WTC come from, nor an engine from flight 175 cross the street, and bash the facade of the Deutsch Bank Building, where body parts were found as recently as 2008.
@mujaku Good question about CGI! Using CGI generated video would never be used as proof, you numbskull!! And here's a question that not a single "no-planer" has been able to comprehend... How do you produce CGI graphics on the fly in such a short amount of time? In corporating CGI graphics in video usually takes planning, storyboarding, developing, and testing in order to get it to run properly. How could they have done that in such a short time frame?
@jazzfan5000 All of the camera footage weren't shown until much later. So it wouldn't be "on the fly". Not that I support this theory. I just see it as plausible but highly unlikely and I don't see anyone proving it implausible. I can't prove it implausible. I just don't believe it. I think there were actual air craft hitting the buildings. But I could be wrong just like anyone.
@timrocket2008 No. You're wrong. Most of the camera footage was caught live on CNN, MSNBC, Fox News, NYC local affiliate stations, Headline News, and the big three networks. Also, I don't see anyone proving that birds flying around in lower Manhattan so that must mean it's implausible. If many (meaning a good number, a good handful, several) cameras caught footage of a plane flying into the south tower than this is what's called empirical data. This is beyond plausible, it's confirmed!!
@jazzfan5000 I'm going to have to disagree with "Most of the camera footage was live" There are many more amateur videos shown much later. Perhaps days later.
"I don't see anyone proving that birds flying around" Umm there isn't any controversy nor any debate in question about birds flying around.
@timrocket2008 Well disagree all you want. Such a massive event taking place is going to have all eyes on it! You have to be a special kind of person to believe that there were no cameras shooting live footage. And if you're suggesting CGI effects were done on the fly, I would guess again. CGI effects take anywhere from an 8 hour working day to a whole month to just create let alone render depending on the length of time for the animation.
@jazzfan5000 I never said "there were no cameras shooting live footage" just saying that you are WRONG about "Most of the camera footage was live" For example. The video of the first plane was not shown live. It was shown at least a day or two later...as many many other video started to surface. The fact is most of the videos were NOT shown live. I am not supporting the no planes theory. I am just pointing out that you are wrong.
how is this busted? he makes a valid point, and shows you exactly how he made a video similar to a lot of the videos on 911, and your response is bullsh!t!
Last time I looked, Hologram special effects don't spread 30 tons of aircraft debris on the streets of New York City, nor that the NOSE WHEEL of flight 11 would CRUSH the legs of a 60 year old woman on WEST street.
NOR dump a flight 11 engine on West street, nor an engine from Flight 175.
HERE is a page LISTING all the evidence of airplane destruction, and the
NAMED first responder witnesses.
sites dot google dot c om/site/ wtc7lies / aircraft partsnyc 911
Excuse me, apparently you're not interested in a real investigation.
In the original live reports on 911, the first determination was that it was an aircraft, a small aircraft or missile. The question is: Why was the video altered from the archived footage, and why were the videos so fuzzy, when the cameras on the helicopters were state of the art, with GPS and sophiisticated real time digital data connections? Looks like a missile to me...G:
@wordgeezer A real investigation has happened. It's called the 9/11 Commission Report and the various reports from NIST.
If you don't believe them that's your problem. Unfortunately for you trooftard losers nothing in any of these reports has been disproven. All troofers have is a load of hot air, lies and bullshit. That's it.
With respect to documents available from this server, NIST and the Center for Theoretical and Computational Materials Science make no warranty, express or implied, including the warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose, or assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information disclosed, or represent that its use would not infringe privately owned rights.
the raging infernos or fires as well as debri caused the collapse of WTC7
-NIST
You just lied the commission report was admmitted to be a fake investigation as for NIST they are wrong
WTC 3 4 5 and 6 where all smaller meaning they had less weight holding the building up AND where closer to the towers where hit by MORE debri AND MORE FIRE YET THEY DIDNT COLLAPSE!
@TheWeaponsmith69 Did you mean set up to FAIL? What is "fale" you illiterate fuckwit? Conclusive proof that all troofers are backward little twerps too stupid to see through the scam that's 9/11 troof.
@terrymanning1 wow you sure showed that twoofer weaponsmith!!!
I mean your a fucking genious! how did you come up with the idea of, instead countering the twooftards claims, just give him a lesson on spelling and completely avoid all of his statements and not even attempt to disprove him!!! and then block him too? oh, my, god! you are soooo smart!
i find it funny how you comepletly and utterly ignored every one of weaponsmiths facts that just made you like a fucking retard.....
It's 'you're,' as in 'you are,' and 'genius,' not 'genious.' You twoofers are dumb as shit. You were 8 years old on 911, face it, you don't have a clue. Keep watching those conspiracy videos, they depend on ignorant dipshits like you.
@terrymanning1 hahaha you're hilarious. did you know that the flight data from flight 77 that hit the pentagon disproves the original story?
seriously, understand that this was a psyop, and release yourself psychologically to look at the facts and make a logical conclusion. have you heard of pearl harbor? the gulf of tonkin incident?
or you could just keep on insulting people.. whatever floats your boat. it just means you don't actually care about the subject, just about u being right.
Smaller builings are inherently more stable, and stronger, inverseley proportional to the size. Which is why its very EASY to build small buildings, and very difficult to set records for large buildings.
History asks interesting questions? Sounds just like G Duhbya Bu$h. Truth is, even the weird words spewing from Pomaroos pie hole are history. It's all history folks, so it behooves us to examine every kind of evidence relating to this evil event, and put it, as Dubya would say, on the table.
Why argue with Ace, there is plenty of video evidence, and testimony indicating a missile or small plane. I certainly wouldn't hang my hat on the testimony of Sean Murtagh or the guy in 3WFC.
@DeepSpace8andahalf never mind that. the whole proposition of having what could be compaired to a aluminium beer can penetrating such a robust structure and going clear thew it, is absolutly untenable!
Ace Baker is on drugs! I was awake and getting ready for a 7AM commute to work, when ABC broke the news of a explosion at WTC. Footage from one of many webcams located in NY showed the airplane-shaped hole of an impact. Then I watched live on TV as a second plane appeared in a left turn descending and impacted the second tower. That was when I knew this was not an accident or some CGI expert making up a lie. WTC really happened, the CIA or US government had no involvement, It was 100% Al Queda
@DeepSpace8andahalf Yes the expression trooftards does speak volumes because it accurately sums up the morons who believe the 9/11 conspiracy crap that's being peddled by charlatans seeking personal profit or to push their anti-USA/war propaganda.
Fortunately there are an ever dwindling number of troofers out there these days. Most have wised up to the scam.... guess you're just not bright enough to have worked things out yet!
@DeepSpace8andahalf Just because it's unexplained, doesn't mean it has to be something sinister. All trooftards like you do is jump to the concusions you want to hear without one iota of proof to back them up.
I have no theorys only questions.I respectfully request the people viewing this, compare the claims made by this truther to what the architects and engineers of 911 truth have to say. please watch bluprint for truth.
these guys are set up to make truthers look stupid. real truthers ask real questions, like wtc7? melted steel? why no private invetgations? and I urge you all to take a look up operation northwoods and gulf of tonkin.
The tell tale is that he immiediately takes this into the personal realm, which is what they do to those of us, who don't buy their non-snese! He's just doing it from a reciprical stance! They normally personally attack us, this is a different spin on the same thing, he's taking OFFENSE right off the bat! This is classic, since they have no evidence to support their claims! He's NOT an expert, yet is allowed to air this child-like fanatasy on another guys show and makes it personal! Douche 100%
I am still fucking laughing at this shit. This guy Ace is fucking insane. There are plenty of angles of tower two that shows a plane hitting as well as witnesses.
I can apreciate Aces need for the truth bu I think hes gone out a little too far with this...the pre set explosion theory is much more believable than this No Plane bullshit!
@Gaz00ks exactly, this guys "proof" that al qaida did 911 is that ur a retard and i'm a retard and Stephan Jones is a retard and anyone who doesn't believe the govermint is a retard cos govermints are oh so honest people who would never burn rome or burn the reichstag or lie about the gulf of tonkin or anything like that in order to start preplanned wars
@Moreofthesamez Like I said... post one fact that proves 9/11 was an inside job. You can't because you troofer fucktards have nothing except hot air, bullshit and lies. Now get the fuck off my channel.
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
Since the govt. committed 9/11, why arent truthers demanding the release of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed who is on trial for his life for a crime truthers claim he did not commit?
If there was no flight 93, please explain how 95% of the plane debris was recovered?
If there was no flight 77, please explain the over 130 witnesses who saw a plane?
We begin with demanding a new and unbiased investigation of 9/11, not with one individual fraud.
95% recovery is a blatant lie. There wasn't even a plane there. NO WRECKAGE NO SKID MARKS
all witnesses shown, who claim to have seen a plane hit, were either were media employees, people connected to media organizations, paid actors or planted shills. 130 people out of how many million New Yorkers?
You'll notice those that believe Planes were used, cant decide on even the most vague # of people who supposedly saw planes.
some will say 100 people saw planes, still others say NO it was 1,000, then others jump in and say both are wrong, it was 10,000, still more say it was 100,000, and even more say oh no everyone else is wrong , it was actually more like
People saw an explosion mostly. Witnesses shown, who claim to have seen a plane hit, were either were media employees, people connected to media organizations, paid actors or planted shills
im sure you are aware of the Witness known as the HARLEY GUY lol who says minutes after the tower collapse that the reason it collapsed was due to structural collapse because of fire melting the steel
@LifeRegenRevolution Well quite clearly the "Harley" guy was wrong wasn't he because the fires DIDN'T melt the steel!
The steel was WEAKENED by the intense heat and when that happenes it has a tendency to lose it's load bearing capability. That's what happened in the towers and wtc7 and only a handful of morons believe otherwise.
If fires couldn't have affected the steel why do construction companies bother fire proofing it in the first place?
he didnt say melt, he said weaken, so i mistaken. Watch the video HARLEY GUY 911, so once more ill ask you, the way he says this so calmly and assuredly only moments after isnt skeptical to you ?
@LifeRegenRevolution So the guy had an opinion of what happened when he was asked. So what. Proves absolutely nothing except truthers desperation to try and twist anything they can find into their web of deceit.
Everyone else is running around in a total panic around him, yet HARLEY GUY is relaxed, composed and speaking in a relaxed easy going voice tone and manner . Plus what he said, is totally un natural and abnormal for anyone to say in that situation. He sounded as if he was pitching a product for a late nite informercial, sounded totally scripted and fake and everyone commenting on that video agrees with my assessment
speaking to the larger issue, whats your opinion on the Fact that every year that passes more and more people around the world believe that this was an Inside Job. You'll notice more and more documentary videos being uploaded on here Claiming Inside Job. You have to hate that and i would imagine it drives you Crazy
Especially knowing that there is literally Nothing you can do to stop it. The word is spreading slowly but surely
@LifeRegenRevolution Actually as the years continue to pass since 9/11 and truthers continue to spout their garbage without providing even the slightest irrefutable fact to prove their claims, it's clear that the majority of normal well adjusted people continue to ignore you kooks. YOU must hate that. No-one's listening to your silly fairy tales and there's nothing you can do to change it!!
Fact is MOST Americans couldnt care less either way and have No interest in this subject at all. They are too busy being mezmerized and interested in Tiger woods sex life and if Jesse James will stay with Sandra Bullock.
You could tell the Avg. American that the official govt. story is that Bigfoot flew the Planes on 911 and they would never ever question or challenge it. Some, probably yourself included, would actually be out promoting it !
im amazed and Astounded at the # of Inside Job documentaries appearing on here compared to a few yrs ago. People from all over the world are re examining 911 with an intensity and passion never seen before. The official Govt story is being examined and evaluated from every angle and Each year passes, we notice more and more Inside Job videos on here , its Exploding ! Does it keep you up at Nite worrying ? ; )
@LifeRegenRevolution So a bunch of kooks keep uploading their lies on YT. Who cares? It's only kooks who are listening and as I've already said. You've proved nothing. Absolutely nothing!
its impossible to prove anything to guys like you who i Noticed follow a pattern of never daring to question any type of Authority at anytime . With that as your fundamental core mindset, there isnt anything i or anyone can possibly say or show you that will ever change your Mind .
@LifeRegenRevolution It's impossible to prove anything to guys like you either. The difference between us is that you are in a very tiny minority of people who choose to believe and peddle lies, and I'm in the vast majority who see through those lies.
@Gaz00ks No it wouldn't put troofers retarded claims to rest.
Unless trooftards bring peer reviewed proof of their claims to court their claims would be thrown out. Then trooftards would all be crying foul again.
Trooftards will only be happy when a court says they're right. But because they never will be right (because they're all stupid fucking liars) you morons will continue peddling your lies to an ever dwindling number of gullible retards who hate the US as much as you do.
Be honest, dont you Loathe and despise the fact that there is Nothing you can do to stop the free flow of independent information being shared with Millions of people around the world who dont believe the same way you do about this ? That its right in your face yet you are utterly Powerless to do anything to stop it and all you can do is sit back and hope it doesnt keep spreading ?
Doesnt that burn ya up deep inside knowing that ????
so dont you just wish someone appointed you as the official 911 Nazi and you had total control of the info that could be presented about 911 on here and that you could squash all free speech on this issue that didnt agree with your own subjective biased opinions ? That as soon as a 911 Truth video went up, you could remove it and the Only vids up here were ones that were in 100 % agreement with you and you alone
@LifeRegenRevolution Quite frankly you're one of the saddest of the sad bunch of truther morons infesting YT at present. I find your stance and attitude toward 9/11 amusing. Especially your no planes garbage! Quite how you think anyone will take you seriously is beyond me. You need help buddy.
I obviously didnt ' invent ' or discover NO planes , its out there whether you like it , agree with it or not. im just sharing information thats out there amongst the Masses avail to anyone who wants to check into it.
What you or anyone else does with it is up to you or them, im just discussing information i have no vested interest in proving anything to anyone, you have your Opinion and i have mine, that simple
@LifeRegenRevolution Yes it's out there. A stupid theory with no basis in fact whatsoever, dreamt up by liars seeking to make money from gullible people and which you have decided to latch onto because it somehow makes you feel important to go against the mainstream.
' a stupid theory with no basis in fact dreamt up by liars seeking to make money from gullible people '
You just brilliantly and accurately described the Official story much better than i ever could, and you dont even realize it lol Honest im not joking i think that is the very best description of the offical govt story summed up in 1 single sentence ive ever heard, and i heard alot of stuff said last few years. Bravo
Flight 93 breaks up into a million tiny Pieces and debri is scattered for miles due to the Planes being so fragile , Yet they are so durable and strong as to go through wtc steel as if the steel were paper according to the videos ?
so The Most complex , multi faceted Event in American history was due to Nothing more than simply 19 Wacky Arab video game nerds waving Rickety box cutters ? Thats it huh, end of story ? my o my
lol Nah sorry but ill pass , that is beyond absurd and utterly ridiculous
@terrymanning1 - Just wanted to let you know that LifeRegenRevolution (AKA Ace Baker) has been shut down, just like AceBaker911 before. I'm sure Ace is working on a new fake account right now, let me know if you figure it out.
So how badly does it bother and irritate you that there are people in this world who dont see things the same way you do, who happen to take a different opinion on events and things than you do and like to think for themselves and form their own opinions and judgements using their own intelligence, reason and Objectivity ?
Do you wish they were dead, just went away or that they had to ask for your approval 1st on what to think and what to read ?
Get in a Brand new Ferrari Automobile and do 200 Plus mph down the freeway, and ill be there recording it as you smash into a Brick Wall, and lets find out if theres the sound of the impact recorded on my Video Camera as i tape the event
Deal ?
Gee Whiz you cant possibly be this stupid . I can just hear you now, ' But the Plane was going 400 mph !!!! '
LOL yea big deal, thats NOTHING my example still stands , 4,000 mph Now we're talking a different story
The most important point in the whole Pentagon arguement is: Wheres the beef?? Wheres the video tape showing ANY aircraft flying into, over , or even nearby the Pentagon on 9/11? You see, if they had it, they would have shown it. Officers, and enlisted stood around at the pentagon that day, it total dis-belief, that their govt. would kill innocent lives, and some of their personal friends and comrades in arms. The US govt would kill its own soldiers to gain control of the whole world.
nongratis1 1 month ago
@nongratis1 You don't need a video showing the plane crashing to know it crashed there. What about the wreckage on the Pentagon lawn. What about the stench of jet fuel many staff talked about? What about the 130+ eye witnesses who all saw a plane. Not one person reported seeing a missile or anything other than a jet plane! You really are an idiot to believe AA77 didn't crash at the Pentagon.
terrymanning1 1 month ago
What I do find interesting about all the 2nd plane hitting footage, is that in almost all of it, it starts off zoomed in, and zooms out just as the plane shows up...even in the amateur videos. Some of those videos do seem very suspect to me for some reason. I'm not saying there weren't planes, I believe there were...just something I noticed from watching almost all the 2nd plane hitting videos.
Cap420 1 month ago in playlist More videos from terrymanning1
Truthers are without doubt the most retarded people on the planet. And nongratis1's comments below prove that beyond all doubt. May I suggest to you that you seek out RKOwens4's channel on here. He debunks every single one of the twoof movements pathetic lies.
terrymanning1 1 month ago
I would suggest to people to go to September Clues, or Scholars for 9/11 truth, In Plane Site is one that someelse has suggested to watch. I'm still watching these vids for more info.
nongratis1 1 month ago
Notice at 2:45 the ex-government hacker sitting in the middle gets real nervous when Ace says the line "nose-out", and "zoom in". All the sudden his ass begins the pucker factor as he contimplates an answer to the most feared of all mistakes made on 9/11 that shows clear video forgery.
nongratis1 2 months ago
@nongratis1 Clear video forgery would be differences in the footage shown in this video, vs video shown from the MANY other networks, and amatuer footage. I don't see Baker ever making an attempt to show anomolies that appear in one video, but not in another. The idea that there were no planes in NYC is the most retarded of all truther theories.
eaglejoe8 2 months ago
@eaglejoe8 That exactly the case here. In one BBC video that day they used a skewed view of the towers, and in the CNN video from the same vantage point, the shot appeared to have altered, fore-ground, and back ground. The amatuer vids had unbelievable ability to hold steady on a 500 mph aircraft without any giggle or distortion. The 175 aircraft shot appears to disapear completely into the tower, not one thing falls off or breaks away at impact. Thats impossible, video fakery.
nongratis1 2 months ago
@nongratis1 Amatuer video being steady is not that shocking if it's attatched to a steady tripod. And a hurricane force wind can drive something like a pencil through a telephone pole, so a plane going into a building made of lightweight steel and glass is not shocking at all, nor impossible. NYC doesn't exactly have a sparce population, and this happened early enough in the morning that many people were on their way to work and saw it. Where are the people who claim there was no plane?
eaglejoe8 2 months ago
@eaglejoe8 So the amatuer videographer was didy-bopping down the ave one early morning with his camera and tripod when he just happened to get a 6th sense that it was time to set the tripod and get ready to film the crime of the new century.
The twin towers were intentionally built to withstand crashes from jet airliners, so stated the original architects. The video fakery seen is only explainable by saying, Video Fakery intended to deceive.
nongratis1 2 months ago
@nongratis1 No, amatuers were filming because tower 1 had already been hit. It had already become a major story on every news network. As for the towers, Les Robertson said the assumption of a plane hitting the towers was based on a plane traveling at low speed, likely lost in a fog, and with low fuel. He also admitted they did not take the fires caused by the jet fuel into account. I suppose you think the hundreds of witnesses to both crashes were planted? Plane parts were planted too?
eaglejoe8 2 months ago
@eaglejoe8 There were no plane parts found at the Pentagon, WTC, or even Shanksville for that matter. At least no parts found from a AA Boeing 757 or 767. The plane #175 was supposedly flying at 500 mph when it decended, and turned into the WTC tower. Flight #11 supposedly did a 190 degree turn as it supposedly flew into the Pentagon. All which are impossible if your a non flying boxcutter terrorist, that hasnt any time in a jet airliner cockpit.
nongratis1 1 month ago
@nongratis1 Uh, there were plane parts at all 3 sites. You are simply wrong there. 95% of the plane in Shanksville was recovered. A simple Google search will show you plane debris from all 3 sites.
eaglejoe8 1 month ago
@eaglejoe8 The only truthful thing you just wrote is, "Uh'. There was a smatering of fuselage debris from an unkown plane, evidently a very small craft. The eingines of a Boeing 767 or 757, are 9 feet by 12 feet in dimensions. Where did those engines disapear of to? None were found at the Pentagon, or at the WTC, or at Shanksville. Its a sad joke played upon the American people on 9/11. It was a farce and a lie, Missles were used at the WTC and the Pentagon without question.
nongratis1 1 month ago
@nongratis1 Engines and/or engine parts were found in all 3 locations. You're wrong again. Missle parts found, and eyewitnesses to missles in any location, are zero.
eaglejoe8 1 month ago
@eaglejoe8 Have you been smoking dope? Parts of a Global hawk have been reported found at the Pentagaon, yes thats true, becuase they had 12 men carry a covered object from the building and hide it under a tarp. The remains of 1 jet engine the size of a Global hawk was photographed on the ground just outside of the Pentagon, otherwise no engines were ever found at any of the locations. Maybe that what you thought you saw, common mistake with folks that dont know the difference in the two.
nongratis1 1 month ago
@nongratis1 Global Hawk? That's hilarious. The "tarp" they were carrying was a tent you moron. Nothing from a Global Hawk was ever found, that is a complete lie. An engine also landed on one of the NYC streets, and an engine was found in the crater in Shanksville, and the other 300 yards from the crash site. Pictures of all except the engine 300 yards away are found with a simple Google search.
eaglejoe8 1 month ago
@eaglejoe8 Your either an idiot, a govt troll-puss. No engines other than a global hawk sized engine was found and a picture caught it before they covered it up. Busted. Men did carry an object away that was covered by a tarp, and it obvious that if it were aircraft fuselage, they would have let the world see it. Since it was "covered up", its clear that it was parts of a global hawk or something damning to their claims, busted again. Keep em coming, son.
nongratis1 1 month ago
@nongratis1 Then why do all known pics of engine parts at the Pentagon match up to diagrams of the RB211-535 equiped on FL77? It's ok, I know you can't answer. You think no planes hit the towers, which shows how incredibly stupid you really are.
eaglejoe8 1 month ago
@eaglejoe8 You are a grade A dumbass. Listen, The engines of Boeing jet Airliners are 7.5 feet by 12.5 feet in deminsions These Pratt Whitney jet engines of the 757's are a little over half the width of the entire jet itself. Their huge engines. NOT like the tiny little engine that is the only one seen in the Pentagon photos. The little engine in the Pent. photo, is only 2 feet by 5 feet in dem. So your little theory is busted again. Come back when you've study and bring your shoe shine box.
nongratis1 1 month ago
@nongratis1 The Boeing hit a steel reinforced, blast proof wall at @500mph and you seriously expect to see the engines intact? Why don't you go and ask an air crash investigator for his professional opinion as what the state of the Boeing would be after a crash like that.
The stupidity and gullibility of truthers never ceases to amaze me.
terrymanning1 1 month ago
@terrymanning1 No need to ask anyone that answers to the federal govt. After the Flt TWA 800 and recent others, the NSTB has lost their credibility as well. Sad to say, but its on the FEDS payroll, then dont bother to ask. You'll have to fill out the request in triplicate, and wait 3 years for a response. The Feds know that its all come unravelled and it no doubt shakes them up.
nongratis1 1 month ago
@nongratis1 Ask an air crash investigator from another country then if you don't trust the US NTSB. Why is it you truther idiots think there would be a bloody great chunk of plane stuck out the side of the building? This isn't a cartoon you moron, it's reality.
terrymanning1 1 month ago
@terrymanning1 They're too stupid to figure that out.
eaglejoe8 1 month ago
@terrymanning1 Your other channel, eagleshits, what a laugh. Big junks from a 757 Boing Jet airliner, with two massive engines, and you say JUNKS, YEAH exactly so take both of your channels and go back to reallty TV bevis and butthead. Thats a good name for both of your channels Terry BEVIS, and Eagleshits BUTTHEAD. Go home you have nothing more to say you've been punked too many times.
nongratis1 1 month ago
@nongratis1 I don't have another channel. And I'm fed up with your juvenile posts and asinine comments. Blocked.
Apologies to eaglejoe8 who was enjoying kicking your ass here!
terrymanning1 1 month ago
@nongratis1 First off moron, FL77 used Rolls Royce engines, not Pratt and Whitney. Second, the photo in question is NOT an engine, it's an engine PART. A part that matches perfectly in size to a disk hub. Not every component is the same size as the outer fan.
.aerospaceweb.o rg/question/conspiracy/q0265.shtml
Read up and educate yourself.
eaglejoe8 1 month ago
@eaglejoe8 Wrong dipshit, the 757 use Pratt and Whitney. The photo clearly ESPOSES the fraud in the "Socalled" Pentagon crash site. Most important point is: Wheres the rest of the engine? Where did the largest part of the Jet run off to? You see the inconsistency and lying, and the deception in the flt #77 hoax? Busted again.
The official version is so full of holes it looks like swiss cheese. Hah.
nongratis1 1 month ago
@nongratis1 They were Rolls Royce engines asshole. Pratt and Whitney themselves directed Chris Bollan from the AFP towards RR when he was "investigating". It's a no wonder you are such a fucking idiot. You can't even get the basic facts right.
eaglejoe8 1 month ago
@eaglejoe8 Did your mother drop you when your were a child, or is the simply fact your still a child? Trying to debate a truthtard such as yourself is like talking with a gold fish. I would expect about as much from a shillster punk. When you lose the arguement then you rant cuss, and cry all the home. Your out of your league, so go have a good cry and suck on your mommas tity.
nongratis1 1 month ago
@nongratis1 I haven't lost any argument. Fl77 used Rolls Royce engines, not Pratt and Whitney. That is an undebatable fact. I have nothing to cry over, because I am right about everything I've said. Meanwhile, the truth movement is still spinning their wheels with claims that in 10 years have all been proven false. Be proud of the loser organization you associate yourself with.
eaglejoe8 1 month ago
Its strange in how there are so many vids like this that disperately try to discredit the video fakery. If it was so bogus, then why are there so many vids just like this one with the same shill hackers, trying to shoot the facts down. I think the feds are scared that this thing will come out fully in the light, and people will rise up. Otherwise it wouldnt even be such a topic at all. I think theres something to this no plane theory, NOW I have to go back and watch it all again.
nongratis1 2 months ago
I don't get these comments Ace Baker sounds spot on none of the arguements against his theory held up in the interview.
dastiffmeisterman 3 months ago
@dastiffmeisterman Then you're as retarded as Ace
terrymanning1 3 months ago
@terrymanning1 if you say so you dellusional idiot.
dastiffmeisterman 3 months ago
@dastiffmeisterman The only delusional idiots are you and Ace baker. Now fuck off. Blocked.
terrymanning1 3 months ago
I find it interesting, that Baker claims they had enough time in real time, to slow the frames down so that the "nose" didn't pop out when Wright's simulation showed it would, but they somehow didn't have enough time to eliminate the "nose" popping out all together.
eaglejoe8 5 months ago
@eaglejoe8 thats a good point. They couldnt eliminate the nose coming thru the tower, but it was too late. they must of had a last minute call to simulate this footage and quick the gig is on. I wonder if they were waiting on something or if was a last minute plan to go into effect.
nongratis1 2 months ago
does one become a 'truther ace " by making a preposterous ass of himself 5 or more times on TV ?
woodenmajor 5 months ago
Go to the Harley T shirt guy video. to see the absolutely absurd supposed eyewitness account of a rehearsed prestaged set up of eyewitnesses.
Its laughable to think that the govt would think that people would be that stupid to go for the sack of lack of talent they used to prop up the notion of intense heat, cuz of jet fuel burning. Oh and that brought down the twin towers, jet fuel burning? LOL My aching sides on that lie. What a prop wash job for the gullible fools to believe.
paskettle 7 months ago
@paskettle So was the "Harley guy" the only person interviewed on 9/11? No. And the guy was pretty much correct in that fires combined with the damage and fire proofing blown off IS what brought the towers down. There is no evidence of bombs or a demo or thermite or any other hare brained BS you truther morons dream up.
9/11 happened exactly as the official accounts say and nothing the retards of 9/11 truth bleat on about is real, and especially not the no-planer minority.
terrymanning1 7 months ago
@terrymanning1 You remind me a child throwing a temper tantrum. Nothing you say, whaaaaa, I'll hold my breath whaaaaa.
You make me laugh my son. The truth will prevail one day, and I hope you have a special seat assigned to you on the fema train. No matter how much ass you kiss, you'll never get on thier good side, you'll never really be used by the govt. I hate to burst your bubble, butt sometimes the truth hurts, then it heals the lame and brokenhearted.
paskettle 7 months ago
@paskettle Ace you're an idiot and I've heard enough from you. Go away or I'll block you.
terrymanning1 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@terrymanning1 Wow, are you in kindergarten? Only someone who is trying to cover up a lie gets mad and blocks people who disagree with them. If you have the truth on your side there should be nothing to be afraid of.
AvatarRoku1 7 months ago
@paskettle Brainwashed "Son".....you people are nothing but paranoid cult followers, who love to jump on the crazy train for truth, none of you can think for yourselves....bow and kneel to King Alex, us sheeple will never know the wisdom of your majesty and we will all burn in hell, while you noble ones will thrive and prevail threw the tyranny and injustice of the NEW WORLD ORDER!!!! Ohhhhh my Soul....please save me, brother!!!! Now thats a REAL TEMPER TANTRUM, EH???!!!!
mherrenschmidt 5 months ago
Ace is 100% correct when we see the nose out of the supposed plane. Now how in the good hell would the nose of the plane still be in tact if it had just crashed through the tower. Its a virtual impossiblity. Anyone that can watch that footage and still believe it to be true is a either a fool, or just a dupe. Thats a video forgery without question. Its starting to look like the govt has lied on all counts about 9/11 except the fact that some force did attack America on 9/11.
paskettle 7 months ago
@paskettle The shape seen is an optical illusion created by the low quality lens videoing it. Plenty of other angles show debris flying from the tower, not the actual nose of the aircraft! Truthers are soooo dumb!
terrymanning1 7 months ago
@terrymanning1 Optical illusion is the whole of the video. It was a fake video made by ametuer cinematography forgers. I understand that you have no expertise or ability to process this information.
You live on a elemental level. Go to the September CLues videos. That will help you begin to understand at the elemetary level. After time your little mouth will hang open, try not to drool while this process begins.
It takes time for everyone to learn and process.
paskettle 7 months ago
@paskettle Right so what you're saying is that every single shot of a plane hitting the tower is fake. That every single person in New York who saw the planes is lying or under some kind of mass delusion. Ok buddy. Keep drinking the kool aid. Idiot.
terrymanning1 7 months ago
@terrymanning1 Some people did see a craft but it was not a jet airliner. Most of them people were still in shock. This was a first for 99 % of the people present that day. They saw a missle, projectile, not a plane.
The foggy misty non glaring picture used in the faked videos is a photo shop forgery. Ametuerish at best, and they are busted for such an feebile attempt. One reporter watching at the time stated She hadnt seen any plane, but the achorman in the studio did see something??
paskettle 7 months ago
@paskettle (Ace Baker under yet another name) How do you explain plane wreckage on the tops of buildings below the towers and at street level? How do you explain how countless amateur pictures and video showed a large passenger jet? Until you can you have nothing Ace and everyone knows it. Give it up.
terrymanning1 7 months ago
@terrymanning1 Where are these supposed pictures, I havent seen any of them. Where are they? Prove your point. There was no wreckage of any plane at the Pentagon or the WTC. No wreckage found in Shanksville Pa either. Weres the proof? Thats the point, exactly thank you for pointing that fact out. There were no black boxes, there were no bodies found at Shanksville Pa. and the Pentagon. Where are the engines. The engines were 9 feet by 12 feet in size. Where are they?
paskettle 7 months ago
@paskettle Look Ace go get yourself some medical care ok. You're clearly delusional as Ron Wieck told you. There are countless images of plane wreckage at all the crash sites as you very well know. These haven't been faked or any other dumbass shit you believe. Go talk to the coroners who picked up body parts and identified them. And the onus of proof is on you if you think the official accounts are lies. Now stop posting on my vids and get help.
terrymanning1 7 months ago
@terrymanning1 IF cant stand the heat then run, and get the hell out of the kitchen. I can only debate with adults that have a capacity to think and balance information. Your a child nibbling on cookies, stopping by the window for a second becuase the pretty colors atracted you. Go home and sit this one out my son.
This is for adults only.
paskettle 7 months ago
@paskettle What the fuck are you waffling on about Ace? I've looked at the no-planer's views and all you're doing is highlighting a couple of anomalies that have been clearly explained as being down to either the limitations of the videotape or the camera/lens. When other factors come into play like the thousands of eye witnesses, personal camcorder footage showing planes, the plane wreckage found etc your views become the idiotic fantasy of a deluded moron. Which sums you up nicely.
terrymanning1 7 months ago
@terrymanning1 Your a simple dude, I cant do anymore than expose the fraud. When you watch the saturday morning cartoons, do you really believe what you see is real? I hope Im not arguing with just a child here.
Theres hope in learning. There was no wreckage found at the Pentagon. Not of any Boeing passenger airliner. Not at shanksville. NONE what so ever. Just a few pre-staged out of work actors were used as supposed eyewitness like ol Mark. " Due to intense heat", blah blah
paskettle 7 months ago
@paskettle You are an idiot Ace ok. Either that or you're seriously ill. Please go get some help.
terrymanning1 7 months ago
@paskettle no you did not "upset me by words directed towards someone else" you annoy me with the bullshit claims you are spewing out that there were no planes. You disprespectful pile of shit. People died on those planes and you are a pile of shit to claim they did not exist or were some way involved. You are a worthless piece of shit to make that claim. And blocking me ahahaha you fucking loser
12weasel100 7 months ago
@paskettle Poor Ace, you got yourself completely destroyed on Hardfire and you still haven't figured out how to learn anything or in lieu of that, shutting your face.
Proceed!
911sausageman 6 months ago
@paskettle "There was no wreckage found at the Pentagon."
That's just an absolute lie, and only the most ignorant and helpless person would believe that when a quick google search easily proves it wrong. You're a pathetic liar and you only serve to spread lies and ignorance. Great job!
nobraintheory 5 months ago
In 2001 PVI which is now Sportvision - PVI, was not as sophisticated as it is today. Simple 3D wireframe is constructed on a 2D camera shot. In 2001. 3 cameras had to be mapped by 3 separate wireframes on which to construct lines for yellow line. In 2001 it was not as easy as it is today but virtual lines for virtual paths of animated icons can be constructed on any camera shot. for any vitual animation. No masks are needed the animation is mapped on color. See Sportvision for latest PVI videos.
074August 9 months ago
Ace!! check yourself in to a mental facility.. TODAY!! Uh..your "expert" analysis and green screen expertise is nothing but allot of silly nonsense. Tell Brian Clark that the wing tip impaled in his office ceiling really is not there. Tell the Asian lady that was very nearly killed when U175's left wing came through the sky lobby she was in.. never really took place.
I think you are a sad fucked up dude.. dude!!!
Ace? How long has this been going on?
roquefortfiles 10 months ago
I believe there were planes. However, this theory is totally plausible. I really haven't seen anyone prove the theory is implausible. Just name calling like "retard" "dildo"
"twoofer" etc. Grow up people. Good luck getting Bin Laden. For 10 years you thought the USA was on the hunt for him. They are not, never were and never will. FBI says he had nothing to do with 9/11.
timrocket2008 11 months ago
Anybody know what Ace Baker's new fake accounts are? I lost track after LifeRegenRevolution was closed and he started LegPains.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
9/11 video footage is not evidence. Sorry, but the footage, itself, is on trial. And so far the truthers are winning while the stooges are losing.
mujaku 1 year ago
@mujaku Yeah right you delusional moron
terrymanning1 1 year ago
@terrymanning1 So when has CGI generated footage become truth? None of the footage could be used in court because it is CGI. As for stooge Wieck, does he ever stop depending on hearsay?
mujaku 1 year ago
@mujaku Try telling the families of those who died on the planes that their loved ones died in CGI planes. Or try telling the thousands of New York citizens who saw the planes that their eyes were deceiving them. Or try telling the clean up crews who found aircraft wreckage that they were mistaken.
You no planers are the most retarded fringe group of the twoof movement. You're ignored for the idiots you are and rightly so.
Now get the fuck of my video you retard.
terrymanning1 1 year ago
@terrymanning1 Well if they were CGI planes in the videos, the theory suggest without saying that there were no people flying into the buildings as it suggest no planes at all flew into the buildings.So theoretically, the families of those who died on the planes would therefore not exist.
timrocket2008 11 months ago
@mujaku
Last time I checked, CGI Generated footage doesn't spread 30 TONS of debris all over manhattan, nor does it drop a Flight 11 NoseWheel on a 50 year old woman, crushing her legs, nor does it drop an engine on West street, outside the offices of the Structural Engineers of NYC, where the engineers who built the WTC come from, nor an engine from flight 175 cross the street, and bash the facade of the Deutsch Bank Building, where body parts were found as recently as 2008.
Sucks to be you
Merlin5x5 1 year ago
@mujaku Good question about CGI! Using CGI generated video would never be used as proof, you numbskull!! And here's a question that not a single "no-planer" has been able to comprehend... How do you produce CGI graphics on the fly in such a short amount of time? In corporating CGI graphics in video usually takes planning, storyboarding, developing, and testing in order to get it to run properly. How could they have done that in such a short time frame?
jazzfan5000 11 months ago
@jazzfan5000 How short of a time frame do you think?
timrocket2008 11 months ago
@timrocket2008 Ummmmmm... from when many cameras throughout Manhattan started shooting video on the morning of Sept. 11, 2001!
jazzfan5000 11 months ago
@jazzfan5000 All of the camera footage weren't shown until much later. So it wouldn't be "on the fly". Not that I support this theory. I just see it as plausible but highly unlikely and I don't see anyone proving it implausible. I can't prove it implausible. I just don't believe it. I think there were actual air craft hitting the buildings. But I could be wrong just like anyone.
timrocket2008 11 months ago
@timrocket2008 No. You're wrong. Most of the camera footage was caught live on CNN, MSNBC, Fox News, NYC local affiliate stations, Headline News, and the big three networks. Also, I don't see anyone proving that birds flying around in lower Manhattan so that must mean it's implausible. If many (meaning a good number, a good handful, several) cameras caught footage of a plane flying into the south tower than this is what's called empirical data. This is beyond plausible, it's confirmed!!
jazzfan5000 11 months ago
@jazzfan5000 I'm going to have to disagree with "Most of the camera footage was live" There are many more amateur videos shown much later. Perhaps days later.
"I don't see anyone proving that birds flying around" Umm there isn't any controversy nor any debate in question about birds flying around.
timrocket2008 11 months ago
@timrocket2008 Well disagree all you want. Such a massive event taking place is going to have all eyes on it! You have to be a special kind of person to believe that there were no cameras shooting live footage. And if you're suggesting CGI effects were done on the fly, I would guess again. CGI effects take anywhere from an 8 hour working day to a whole month to just create let alone render depending on the length of time for the animation.
jazzfan5000 11 months ago
@jazzfan5000 I never said "there were no cameras shooting live footage" just saying that you are WRONG about "Most of the camera footage was live" For example. The video of the first plane was not shown live. It was shown at least a day or two later...as many many other video started to surface. The fact is most of the videos were NOT shown live. I am not supporting the no planes theory. I am just pointing out that you are wrong.
timrocket2008 11 months ago
@timrocket2008 Okay then! Let me rephrase... there were people with cameras who were recording the event as it happened. There! How's that?
jazzfan5000 11 months ago
@jazzfan5000 And does your time frame change as well?
timrocket2008 11 months ago
@timrocket2008 It doesn't matter.
jazzfan5000 11 months ago
@mujaku get of the weed .
MrEestimaa 11 months ago
how is this busted? he makes a valid point, and shows you exactly how he made a video similar to a lot of the videos on 911, and your response is bullsh!t!
ridiculous.
wygram 1 year ago
@wygram
Last time I looked, Hologram special effects don't spread 30 tons of aircraft debris on the streets of New York City, nor that the NOSE WHEEL of flight 11 would CRUSH the legs of a 60 year old woman on WEST street.
NOR dump a flight 11 engine on West street, nor an engine from Flight 175.
HERE is a page LISTING all the evidence of airplane destruction, and the
NAMED first responder witnesses.
sites dot google dot c om/site/ wtc7lies / aircraft partsnyc 911
Merlin5x5 1 year ago
hey you edited out his first point @ 2:30, why?
cocoadelete 1 year ago
@cocoadelete Watch the first part. This is the second part of the vid.
terrymanning1 1 year ago
Excuse me, apparently you're not interested in a real investigation.
In the original live reports on 911, the first determination was that it was an aircraft, a small aircraft or missile. The question is: Why was the video altered from the archived footage, and why were the videos so fuzzy, when the cameras on the helicopters were state of the art, with GPS and sophiisticated real time digital data connections? Looks like a missile to me...G:
wordgeezer 1 year ago
@wordgeezer A real investigation has happened. It's called the 9/11 Commission Report and the various reports from NIST.
If you don't believe them that's your problem. Unfortunately for you trooftard losers nothing in any of these reports has been disproven. All troofers have is a load of hot air, lies and bullshit. That's it.
terrymanning1 1 year ago
@terrymanning1 Yep, a load of crap from NIST
CTCMS
With respect to documents available from this server, NIST and the Center for Theoretical and Computational Materials Science make no warranty, express or implied, including the warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose, or assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information disclosed, or represent that its use would not infringe privately owned rights.
wordgeezer 1 year ago
@terrymanning1 the commission was set up to fale
-head of the 9/11 commission report
the raging infernos or fires as well as debri caused the collapse of WTC7
-NIST
You just lied the commission report was admmitted to be a fake investigation as for NIST they are wrong
WTC 3 4 5 and 6 where all smaller meaning they had less weight holding the building up AND where closer to the towers where hit by MORE debri AND MORE FIRE YET THEY DIDNT COLLAPSE!
NIST has been debunked so all you fuck off!!
TheWeaponsmith69 1 year ago
@TheWeaponsmith69 Did you mean set up to FAIL? What is "fale" you illiterate fuckwit? Conclusive proof that all troofers are backward little twerps too stupid to see through the scam that's 9/11 troof.
terrymanning1 1 year ago
@terrymanning1 wow you sure showed that twoofer weaponsmith!!!
I mean your a fucking genious! how did you come up with the idea of, instead countering the twooftards claims, just give him a lesson on spelling and completely avoid all of his statements and not even attempt to disprove him!!! and then block him too? oh, my, god! you are soooo smart!
i find it funny how you comepletly and utterly ignored every one of weaponsmiths facts that just made you like a fucking retard.....
YouthfulResistance 1 year ago
@YouthfulResistance "I mean your a fucking genious!"
It's 'you're,' as in 'you are,' and 'genius,' not 'genious.' You twoofers are dumb as shit. You were 8 years old on 911, face it, you don't have a clue. Keep watching those conspiracy videos, they depend on ignorant dipshits like you.
Miko5000 1 year ago
@terrymanning1 hahaha you're hilarious. did you know that the flight data from flight 77 that hit the pentagon disproves the original story?
seriously, understand that this was a psyop, and release yourself psychologically to look at the facts and make a logical conclusion. have you heard of pearl harbor? the gulf of tonkin incident?
or you could just keep on insulting people.. whatever floats your boat. it just means you don't actually care about the subject, just about u being right.
wygram 1 year ago
@TheRetardsmith69
Weight doesnt hold up a building.
Smaller builings are inherently more stable, and stronger, inverseley proportional to the size. Which is why its very EASY to build small buildings, and very difficult to set records for large buildings.
Class dismissed.
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
History asks interesting questions? Sounds just like G Duhbya Bu$h. Truth is, even the weird words spewing from Pomaroos pie hole are history. It's all history folks, so it behooves us to examine every kind of evidence relating to this evil event, and put it, as Dubya would say, on the table.
Why argue with Ace, there is plenty of video evidence, and testimony indicating a missile or small plane. I certainly wouldn't hang my hat on the testimony of Sean Murtagh or the guy in 3WFC.
wordgeezer 1 year ago
@wordgeezer You're an idiot.
terrymanning1 1 year ago
the old man is cleary a NUT .....
akapp 1 year ago
@DeepSpace8andahalf never mind that. the whole proposition of having what could be compaired to a aluminium beer can penetrating such a robust structure and going clear thew it, is absolutly untenable!
BarbarianRebellion 1 year ago
The guy looks like Weird Al Yankovic...what a douche
Ty311 1 year ago
Ace Baker is on drugs! I was awake and getting ready for a 7AM commute to work, when ABC broke the news of a explosion at WTC. Footage from one of many webcams located in NY showed the airplane-shaped hole of an impact. Then I watched live on TV as a second plane appeared in a left turn descending and impacted the second tower. That was when I knew this was not an accident or some CGI expert making up a lie. WTC really happened, the CIA or US government had no involvement, It was 100% Al Queda
borderraven 1 year ago
@DeepSpace8andahalf Yes the expression trooftards does speak volumes because it accurately sums up the morons who believe the 9/11 conspiracy crap that's being peddled by charlatans seeking personal profit or to push their anti-USA/war propaganda.
Fortunately there are an ever dwindling number of troofers out there these days. Most have wised up to the scam.... guess you're just not bright enough to have worked things out yet!
terrymanning1 1 year ago
@DeepSpace8andahalf Just because it's unexplained, doesn't mean it has to be something sinister. All trooftards like you do is jump to the concusions you want to hear without one iota of proof to back them up.
terrymanning1 1 year ago
This is SICK,
ACE ... even if he may be delusional, is presenting evidence for the case that the crash of FLT175 was fake, and there is some other explanation.
The fact that this video, alleges some sort of mental problem on the part of ACE
totally discredits this video. Thank U very much
Gaz00ks 1 year ago
@Gaz00ks Ace DOES have mental problems.
Did you know he faked his own suicide during a phone interview with Jim Fetzer?
The man is mentally unstable and saying he needs help in a mental hospital is perfectly valid.
As for "evidence" of no planes? If you believe there were no planes I suggest you check yourself into the same hospital!
terrymanning1 1 year ago
@terrymanning1 ... This issue has NOT had its day in court yet, and the "Official"
taxpayer funded report on the subject is NOT worth the paper its printed on.
The ultimate respect for those who died on that day, is to learn the TRUTH.
and so far there has been a LOT of argument, but little of any substance.
With that said... do you support the FRAUD that NIST published with regards to WTC7 ?
also, do you remember the Gulf of Tonkin fiasco?
Gaz00ks 1 year ago
@Gaz00ks You're a kook peddling the same lies of the troof movement because you're too stupid to understand what being objective means.
You WANT to believe the inside job lie so you ignore anything that dispels it. You help promote the kook theories because you despise the USA.
terrymanning1 1 year ago
just because ace is a bit out there dosent mean 911 truth thinks no planes hit the building
look up the jersey girls documentary and you will see facts not theory portrayed as fact
also Invisible empire
europa 1 year ago
I have no theorys only questions.I respectfully request the people viewing this, compare the claims made by this truther to what the architects and engineers of 911 truth have to say. please watch bluprint for truth.
tsummerlin84 2 years ago
Im not trying to ' prove' anything to anyone. Im just an Avg. American with a strong desire to find out the Truth.
and im sorry but i heard and seen the Evidence attempting to Prove there were Planes, and im just not Convinced.
The examination into NO planes is more rational, objective, logical, and rooted in common sense than the Plane theory the govt. gave us.
You need to examine both sides b4 u make up your mind
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
these guys are set up to make truthers look stupid. real truthers ask real questions, like wtc7? melted steel? why no private invetgations? and I urge you all to take a look up operation northwoods and gulf of tonkin.
tsummerlin84 2 years ago
tsummer
Or is it perhaps guys like YOU are a set up to make independent 911 investigators like Baker look bad ?
I have also been independently examining 911 using Common Sense, Objective clear thinking and Logic
and i do not think Planes were used and feel Baker makes an excellent Case for it, as do MANY others.
There are TONS of vids on here that explain No Planes, its obviously not just Baker , its growing more and more every year
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
Zeitgeist is bullshit and truthers are douchebags
Synthetrix 2 years ago
the big thing about this is.
WHY WOULD AMERICA BLOW THEIR OWN BUILDINGS UP
ryanishereyay123 2 years ago
The tell tale is that he immiediately takes this into the personal realm, which is what they do to those of us, who don't buy their non-snese! He's just doing it from a reciprical stance! They normally personally attack us, this is a different spin on the same thing, he's taking OFFENSE right off the bat! This is classic, since they have no evidence to support their claims! He's NOT an expert, yet is allowed to air this child-like fanatasy on another guys show and makes it personal! Douche 100%
GGcaptmandrake 2 years ago
I am still fucking laughing at this shit. This guy Ace is fucking insane. There are plenty of angles of tower two that shows a plane hitting as well as witnesses.
487mip 2 years ago
I can apreciate Aces need for the truth bu I think hes gone out a little too far with this...the pre set explosion theory is much more believable than this No Plane bullshit!
gyruss73 2 years ago
@gyruss73 There was no plane, and there were explosives in the building
iconoclast911 2 years ago
iconoclast...
You're a retard
terrymanning1 2 years ago
@terrymanning1 Brilliant(!) ... the only thing you can come up with
in rebuttal, is "retard" ... like little children calling one-another names
because then they have no intellectual ammo to use.....
Gaz00ks 1 year ago
@Gaz00ks You troofers are the ones with no intellectual ammo.
When you have anything credible that would stand up in court or be scientifically proven come back and try again little man.
Until then kindly get the fuck off my channel.
terrymanning1 1 year ago
@Gaz00ks exactly, this guys "proof" that al qaida did 911 is that ur a retard and i'm a retard and Stephan Jones is a retard and anyone who doesn't believe the govermint is a retard cos govermints are oh so honest people who would never burn rome or burn the reichstag or lie about the gulf of tonkin or anything like that in order to start preplanned wars
Moreofthesamez 1 year ago
@Moreofthesamez Like I said... post one fact that proves 9/11 was an inside job. You can't because you troofer fucktards have nothing except hot air, bullshit and lies. Now get the fuck off my channel.
terrymanning1 1 year ago
Comment removed
Plan911FrmOuterSpace 2 years ago
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
Since the govt. committed 9/11, why arent truthers demanding the release of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed who is on trial for his life for a crime truthers claim he did not commit?
If there was no flight 93, please explain how 95% of the plane debris was recovered?
If there was no flight 77, please explain the over 130 witnesses who saw a plane?
ctcole77 2 years ago
We begin with demanding a new and unbiased investigation of 9/11, not with one individual fraud.
95% recovery is a blatant lie. There wasn't even a plane there. NO WRECKAGE NO SKID MARKS
all witnesses shown, who claim to have seen a plane hit, were either were media employees, people connected to media organizations, paid actors or planted shills. 130 people out of how many million New Yorkers?
iconoclast911 2 years ago
You complete fucktard...
there were over 130 eye witnesses at the PENTAGON who saw a plane and nothing else!
Duh!
terrymanning1 2 years ago
icon
You'll notice those that believe Planes were used, cant decide on even the most vague # of people who supposedly saw planes.
some will say 100 people saw planes, still others say NO it was 1,000, then others jump in and say both are wrong, it was 10,000, still more say it was 100,000, and even more say oh no everyone else is wrong , it was actually more like
1,000, 000 up to 7,000,000. So which is it ?
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
@LifeRegenRevolution there were various planes in the sky over NY that morning.
People saw an explosion mostly. Witnesses shown, who claim to have seen a plane hit, were either were media employees, people connected to media organizations, paid actors or planted shills
iconoclast911 1 year ago
@iconoclast911
im sure you are aware of the Witness known as the HARLEY GUY lol who says minutes after the tower collapse that the reason it collapsed was due to structural collapse because of fire melting the steel
how could he possibly know that so soon ?
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
@LifeRegenRevolution Well quite clearly the "Harley" guy was wrong wasn't he because the fires DIDN'T melt the steel!
The steel was WEAKENED by the intense heat and when that happenes it has a tendency to lose it's load bearing capability. That's what happened in the towers and wtc7 and only a handful of morons believe otherwise.
If fires couldn't have affected the steel why do construction companies bother fire proofing it in the first place?
Answer that one genius.
terrymanning1 1 year ago
@terrymanning1
he didnt say melt, he said weaken, so i mistaken. Watch the video HARLEY GUY 911, so once more ill ask you, the way he says this so calmly and assuredly only moments after isnt skeptical to you ?
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
@LifeRegenRevolution So the guy had an opinion of what happened when he was asked. So what. Proves absolutely nothing except truthers desperation to try and twist anything they can find into their web of deceit.
terrymanning1 1 year ago
@terrymanning1
Everyone else is running around in a total panic around him, yet HARLEY GUY is relaxed, composed and speaking in a relaxed easy going voice tone and manner . Plus what he said, is totally un natural and abnormal for anyone to say in that situation. He sounded as if he was pitching a product for a late nite informercial, sounded totally scripted and fake and everyone commenting on that video agrees with my assessment
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
@terrymanning1
speaking to the larger issue, whats your opinion on the Fact that every year that passes more and more people around the world believe that this was an Inside Job. You'll notice more and more documentary videos being uploaded on here Claiming Inside Job. You have to hate that and i would imagine it drives you Crazy
Especially knowing that there is literally Nothing you can do to stop it. The word is spreading slowly but surely
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
@LifeRegenRevolution Actually as the years continue to pass since 9/11 and truthers continue to spout their garbage without providing even the slightest irrefutable fact to prove their claims, it's clear that the majority of normal well adjusted people continue to ignore you kooks. YOU must hate that. No-one's listening to your silly fairy tales and there's nothing you can do to change it!!
terrymanning1 1 year ago
@terrymanning1
Fact is MOST Americans couldnt care less either way and have No interest in this subject at all. They are too busy being mezmerized and interested in Tiger woods sex life and if Jesse James will stay with Sandra Bullock.
You could tell the Avg. American that the official govt. story is that Bigfoot flew the Planes on 911 and they would never ever question or challenge it. Some, probably yourself included, would actually be out promoting it !
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
@terrymanning1
im amazed and Astounded at the # of Inside Job documentaries appearing on here compared to a few yrs ago. People from all over the world are re examining 911 with an intensity and passion never seen before. The official Govt story is being examined and evaluated from every angle and Each year passes, we notice more and more Inside Job videos on here , its Exploding ! Does it keep you up at Nite worrying ? ; )
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
@LifeRegenRevolution So a bunch of kooks keep uploading their lies on YT. Who cares? It's only kooks who are listening and as I've already said. You've proved nothing. Absolutely nothing!
terrymanning1 1 year ago
@terrymanning1
its impossible to prove anything to guys like you who i Noticed follow a pattern of never daring to question any type of Authority at anytime . With that as your fundamental core mindset, there isnt anything i or anyone can possibly say or show you that will ever change your Mind .
i finally realize that
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
@LifeRegenRevolution It's impossible to prove anything to guys like you either. The difference between us is that you are in a very tiny minority of people who choose to believe and peddle lies, and I'm in the vast majority who see through those lies.
terrymanning1 1 year ago
@terrymanning1
You are correct i agree completely i am in the Minority, but i suppose id describe it as such as in MOST things in life
MOST people are wrong about MOST things, MOST of the time
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
@terrymanning1 ... is so ... is NOT
etc ... ad nausum
How about we all put some energy behind getting our day in court.
If the Supreme Court heard this case and wrote a final judgment on this subject, that would put it to rest for sure ... right ?
Gaz00ks 1 year ago
@Gaz00ks No it wouldn't put troofers retarded claims to rest.
Unless trooftards bring peer reviewed proof of their claims to court their claims would be thrown out. Then trooftards would all be crying foul again.
Trooftards will only be happy when a court says they're right. But because they never will be right (because they're all stupid fucking liars) you morons will continue peddling your lies to an ever dwindling number of gullible retards who hate the US as much as you do.
terrymanning1 1 year ago
@terrymanning1
Be honest, dont you Loathe and despise the fact that there is Nothing you can do to stop the free flow of independent information being shared with Millions of people around the world who dont believe the same way you do about this ? That its right in your face yet you are utterly Powerless to do anything to stop it and all you can do is sit back and hope it doesnt keep spreading ?
Doesnt that burn ya up deep inside knowing that ????
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
@terrymanning1
so dont you just wish someone appointed you as the official 911 Nazi and you had total control of the info that could be presented about 911 on here and that you could squash all free speech on this issue that didnt agree with your own subjective biased opinions ? That as soon as a 911 Truth video went up, you could remove it and the Only vids up here were ones that were in 100 % agreement with you and you alone
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
@LifeRegenRevolution Quite frankly you're one of the saddest of the sad bunch of truther morons infesting YT at present. I find your stance and attitude toward 9/11 amusing. Especially your no planes garbage! Quite how you think anyone will take you seriously is beyond me. You need help buddy.
terrymanning1 1 year ago
@terrymanning1
I obviously didnt ' invent ' or discover NO planes , its out there whether you like it , agree with it or not. im just sharing information thats out there amongst the Masses avail to anyone who wants to check into it.
What you or anyone else does with it is up to you or them, im just discussing information i have no vested interest in proving anything to anyone, you have your Opinion and i have mine, that simple
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
@LifeRegenRevolution Yes it's out there. A stupid theory with no basis in fact whatsoever, dreamt up by liars seeking to make money from gullible people and which you have decided to latch onto because it somehow makes you feel important to go against the mainstream.
The rest of the world are laughing at you.
terrymanning1 1 year ago
@terrymanning1
' a stupid theory with no basis in fact dreamt up by liars seeking to make money from gullible people '
You just brilliantly and accurately described the Official story much better than i ever could, and you dont even realize it lol Honest im not joking i think that is the very best description of the offical govt story summed up in 1 single sentence ive ever heard, and i heard alot of stuff said last few years. Bravo
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
@terrymanning1
Flight 93 breaks up into a million tiny Pieces and debri is scattered for miles due to the Planes being so fragile , Yet they are so durable and strong as to go through wtc steel as if the steel were paper according to the videos ?
lol oh ok sure
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
@terrymanning1
so The Most complex , multi faceted Event in American history was due to Nothing more than simply 19 Wacky Arab video game nerds waving Rickety box cutters ? Thats it huh, end of story ? my o my
lol Nah sorry but ill pass , that is beyond absurd and utterly ridiculous
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
@terrymanning1 - Just wanted to let you know that LifeRegenRevolution (AKA Ace Baker) has been shut down, just like AceBaker911 before. I'm sure Ace is working on a new fake account right now, let me know if you figure it out.
Miko5000 1 year ago
@terrymanning1
So how badly does it bother and irritate you that there are people in this world who dont see things the same way you do, who happen to take a different opinion on events and things than you do and like to think for themselves and form their own opinions and judgements using their own intelligence, reason and Objectivity ?
Do you wish they were dead, just went away or that they had to ask for your approval 1st on what to think and what to read ?
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
@LifeRegenRevolution Harley guy is an actor also a guy named Gary Wiess
not sure of the spelling of his last name. The complicit media went to the actors playing eye witnesses for reports from the people on the street
iconoclast911 1 year ago
ace is brilliant-love him
mot10001 2 years ago
Ace is a dipshit and got put in his place on this show.
ZombieDeathStomp 2 years ago
Ace Baker looks and sounds like Wayne Campbell.
Crit0 2 years ago
Ace speaks the Truth !
ACEBAKER911 2 years ago
Talking about yourself in the third person doesn't make you right, it makes you crazy. And sad. But mostly crazy.
Miko5000 2 years ago
Get in a Brand new Ferrari Automobile and do 200 Plus mph down the freeway, and ill be there recording it as you smash into a Brick Wall, and lets find out if theres the sound of the impact recorded on my Video Camera as i tape the event
Deal ?
Gee Whiz you cant possibly be this stupid . I can just hear you now, ' But the Plane was going 400 mph !!!! '
LOL yea big deal, thats NOTHING my example still stands , 4,000 mph Now we're talking a different story
ACEBAKER911 2 years ago
Uhhh......what?