@chaosrealm93 Zeiss has designed a couple of lenses for Sony, some of which I own, but they really only design and supervise manufacturing. Most of the lenses Sony has are re-badged Minolta's.
@chaosrealm93 Zeiss only licenses some of the glass and group technology to Sony. The original Zeiss lenses made in Germany cost easily tree times as much as then expensive Sony Zeiss lenses and most are not made with Sony mount. The Sony Zeiss lenses are made by the old Minolta lens division bought by Sony when they entered the DSLR market. Actually Tamron also makes some of Sony lenses with the Sony badge. They are basically re-branded Nikon lenses.
@hbphotography700 I swear the 'G' symbol is for the new Nikon lenses whereas minolta had the G name since the A mount began as the G lenses were the super expensive lenses!
@gerSick I'm no longer waiting for a FF Sony with video, instead, I have decided to save up for a Leica M9. Which will take a while... : D
I bought this lens because I need the wider focal length and I'm still very happy with my A700. Plus the price of the A850 went up quite a bit here in Holland, so it's even more expensive.
Still, I might be selling this and some of my other lenses in a year or so, to get new glass for the M-system.
Nice video as always! I do notice the audio had been muted due to copyright issue, I'm fine with it cuz I have the same song as you inserted in despite mine one is a bit masterly digitalised.
@laroygreen Thanks Leonard! The build quality is great. Metal construction is much better than the 24-70mm plastic, although the latter has a metal hood. Focus on both lenses is very smooth, although the 24-70mm is just at a different level in that field. I like the fact the 35mm has a smooth-surface focus ring, so you don't get the dust issue Sony lenses are known to have.
@thedr4gon Thanks Ryan! I put up videos that got muted earlier, but they just got an iTunes link as one of those pop-up ads and the audio came back...
I've always wondered why the 35mm f1.4 has to be that big when they have a 50mm 1.4 that's compact. Or like my Minolta 35/2 is similar to the 50mm 1.4 in size.
Zeiss, Voigtlander, and Leica all make very compact 35mm 1.4's.
I just bought this lens, its so nice!!!!!!!, no not nice. Its just awesomeee!!!! pure ectasy!!!!!
OriginalAizat8905 3 weeks ago in playlist Favorite videos
How I wish I can own this lens.
blackdindang 6 months ago
cant help but think they stole the "G" from nikon.......
chaosrealm93 1 year ago
@chaosrealm93 Minolta must have stolen it then, because Sony just inherited the label from them...
hbphotography700 1 year ago
@hbphotography700 i thought zeiss makes sony's lenses.. =s
chaosrealm93 1 year ago
@chaosrealm93 Zeiss has designed a couple of lenses for Sony, some of which I own, but they really only design and supervise manufacturing. Most of the lenses Sony has are re-badged Minolta's.
hbphotography700 1 year ago
@hbphotography700 oh. i see.
chaosrealm93 1 year ago
@chaosrealm93 Zeiss only licenses some of the glass and group technology to Sony. The original Zeiss lenses made in Germany cost easily tree times as much as then expensive Sony Zeiss lenses and most are not made with Sony mount. The Sony Zeiss lenses are made by the old Minolta lens division bought by Sony when they entered the DSLR market. Actually Tamron also makes some of Sony lenses with the Sony badge. They are basically re-branded Nikon lenses.
mYOzZyKaT 1 year ago
@mYOzZyKaT ah, i see. thanks for the in depth explanation =)
chaosrealm93 1 year ago
@mYOzZyKaT
Your are not right on this.
The Sony Zeiss lenss are designed by Zeiss but mass produced in Japan.
Glass is made by Zeiss and they have two serial numbers for glass and body.
The 135mm f/1.8 does only exist for A Mount and is superb.
This 85mm, the 24-70, 16-35, 18-80 crop and the new 24 f/2 are equal or better than Canon/Nikon designs.
There has been some critics on the build quality of some Sony Zeiss lenses but the optical performance is unquestionable Zeiss standard.
gerSick 1 year ago
@hbphotography700 I swear the 'G' symbol is for the new Nikon lenses whereas minolta had the G name since the A mount began as the G lenses were the super expensive lenses!
97adhib 3 weeks ago
You will have to wait some years for FF Alpha with video.
I wonder why you haven't spend the money on A850 instead of this lens.
But as long as you are happy with your gear ;o)
gerSick 1 year ago
@gerSick I'm no longer waiting for a FF Sony with video, instead, I have decided to save up for a Leica M9. Which will take a while... : D
I bought this lens because I need the wider focal length and I'm still very happy with my A700. Plus the price of the A850 went up quite a bit here in Holland, so it's even more expensive.
Still, I might be selling this and some of my other lenses in a year or so, to get new glass for the M-system.
hbphotography700 1 year ago
Dudeeeee... Finally! got your 35mm f1.4! :D Niceeeeee.... :D
braynumb 1 year ago
@braynumb I sure did, thanks! Loving it so far, a great wide-angle prime.
hbphotography700 1 year ago
Bummer. No sound.
ar4216 1 year ago
@ar4216 There's a link to Vimeo in the description, you can watch it with sound there...
hbphotography700 1 year ago
Wow nice lens, i will get this lens altogether with the 70-400 G this year :)
iglyduckling 1 year ago
@iglyduckling Thanks! I hope to get that 135mm you unboxed some time next year, hoping I can buy the new Zeiss 24mm f/2 SSM this year...
hbphotography700 1 year ago
Hi Bjorn, Tadej here...
Looks like a great lens. Can't wait to see some samples! :-)
TTphotography 1 year ago
@TTphotography It sure is a great lens Tadej! some samples will soon be up on my Flickr!
hbphotography700 1 year ago
Nice video as always! I do notice the audio had been muted due to copyright issue, I'm fine with it cuz I have the same song as you inserted in despite mine one is a bit masterly digitalised.
Keep it Up!
lolitaluvphotography 1 year ago
@lolitaluvphotography Thanks Adi!
hbphotography700 1 year ago
Looks great, if only it was 1000 pounds cheaper haha
robbybobby20009 1 year ago
@robbybobby20009 That'd be great! So far the only thing I don't like about the lens is paying so much for it. Oh well...
hbphotography700 1 year ago
@hbphotography700 Looks like the lens is true to the phrase "you pay for what you get" then eh? :)
robbybobby20009 1 year ago
Thanks for posting! Really nice. Much smaller than I expected. How's the build quality compared to say the Zeiss 24-70?
laroygreen 1 year ago
@laroygreen Thanks Leonard! The build quality is great. Metal construction is much better than the 24-70mm plastic, although the latter has a metal hood. Focus on both lenses is very smooth, although the 24-70mm is just at a different level in that field. I like the fact the 35mm has a smooth-surface focus ring, so you don't get the dust issue Sony lenses are known to have.
hbphotography700 1 year ago
zomg! dangit they muted you again? that's lame.
very nice lens! time to add it to your other toys pictured on your desk!
thedr4gon 1 year ago
@thedr4gon Thanks Ryan! I put up videos that got muted earlier, but they just got an iTunes link as one of those pop-up ads and the audio came back...
hbphotography700 1 year ago
@thedr4gon @hbphotography700 The video is now up on Vimeo, with sound. Link's in the underbar!
hbphotography700 1 year ago
I've always wondered why the 35mm f1.4 has to be that big when they have a 50mm 1.4 that's compact. Or like my Minolta 35/2 is similar to the 50mm 1.4 in size.
Zeiss, Voigtlander, and Leica all make very compact 35mm 1.4's.
rhddrifter86 1 year ago
@rhddrifter86 This lens isn't even that big, comparable to Nikon's old lens and smaller than Canon's USM L version.
thedr4gon 1 year ago
VERY Nice..! :-)
conory 1 year ago
@conory Thanks!
Hope the music comes back soon...
hbphotography700 1 year ago