Of course it was silent, that was only 20-50g of explosives, not to mention it being under snow. To cut thick piece of steel like an I-beam you would need ALOT more.
I believe it could be because the snow muffled the explosion. And....to the people down below, well, of course you didn't HEAR the explosions, there were no charges to make the explosions, just planes! See? Simple. No charges, no conspriracy, no...ummm...mole people or anything else?
It was still louder than anything heard right before the bldgs collapsed on 9/11, and that was only one. To bring down the towers you would have needed 10's of thousands all going off at the same time to create what would have been the largest demolition attempt in history.
You must be sniffing glue to compare the sound of one little charge sitting in snow with that of the demolition of 270 floors of industrial steel.
That explosion was NOT that loud and could easily be confused with a collapsing building. Who said that they only used linear charges anyway? I am positive they have explosives and technology up their sleeves we are not privy to.
Haha, secret demolition charges that the demolition industry doesn't know anything about. Too funny. Another conspiracy I guess. Another conspiracy within a conspiracy. Well, I guess if you can just keep making things up to fit your 9/11 conspiracy theory than you will never deal with logic. I mean, there were no loud explosions before the collapse, which is proof that it was demolished by explosives, but hey, no problem, you just make up that there are secret silent explosions. It'll never end!
There are many eye-witnesses who heard a number of explosions at the WTC complex. Many of them firefighters.
People in the lobby felt an explosion from the basement.
You can see the molten thermite dripping out the side of the building in one of the video clips.
In another clip shot 3 weeks after 9/11, they were pulling yellow-hot molten steel from "the pit". This stuff had a temperature of approx 1492 °C (2720 °F). Jet fuel simply CANNOT do that with it's 287.5 °C (549.5 °F) flame.
Of course many people heard explosions going off, they go off everywhere in a compromised bldg. But nobody mentioned bombs
What the people in the lobby felt was an explosion cause from the jet fuel travelling down the elevator shaft and exploding in the basement, well documented
If thermite brought down the bldg (impossible) it would take more than I little source in one corner in one bldg. You wouuld have to see that reaction all around both bldgs. Video evidence shows that you don't
In any big commercial bldg fire there are always small explosions -- no surprise to any fireman. The huge electrical transformers explode like mad, generators & fuel tanks, and bottled gas everywhere: acetylene, oxygen in maint. shops; oxygen, anesthetic in medical & dental offices & first aid rooms, propane & LPG in cafeterias & snack bars, fridges, air conditioning units etc. Even the sound of a pipe bursting can sound like an explosion when the pipes first burst, plus falling elevators
Understandably, these things would go in any building fire, but these firemen found these explosion sounds all in sequence unusual enough to comment on afterwards.
Which were done DURING THE F* CLEANUP, with lance torches, it isn't perfect, there's molten metal all over the place. Those charges don't leave unsteady cuts or molten metal. Further more, it's about a hundred times easier to wipe out the connections than the columns themselves. Even more, the buildings were completely capable of wiping themselves down once the collapses started.
That is your quote regarding my comments on the firefighters noticing that the front of bldg 7 was scooped out.
While I do not blame people for not trusting the gov't, or for at least having questions, I do not for one second thinkg that the fireman at ground zero on 9/11 were part of an "inside job". It is they that report the condition of
WTC7 before it's collapse. These are people that wake up everyday with a goal of saving lives, not destroying them
Actually, that little cliche was in reference to the whole 911 scam and conspiracies in general.
This is actually the first I hear of Bldg. 7's front being scooped out. and reported by firefighters.
I totally agree with you on that point. The volunteers and firefighters who lent a hand on that tragic day, are heroes.
They sacrificed their health and lives to save others. They and their families were actually the ones to start the whole 911-truth movement in the first place.
I'm not talking about the charge relative to environmental conditions, I'm talking about the explosion itself. Even if not muffled, the explosion would be small.
And what experience with HEs has led you to this conclusion? I have personally witnessed charges in snow, it's very easy to underestimate the strength. Based on this guy's other videos and the length of that charge, I would have to say it would be fairly large.
best way to get rid of pc virus, NO firewall needed!
Northhunt 1 year ago
what explosive was it petn etn anfo what
diapysik 1 year ago
What did that poor drive ever do to you?
L00NGB00W 2 years ago
Comment removed
FranciscoSRO2 2 years ago
Comment removed
FOATE 2 years ago
ok.....
FranciscoSRO2 2 years ago
what was the energetic material used?
Peterditaa 2 years ago
the snow is great for muffaling the blast
hessy11 2 years ago
Of course it was silent, that was only 20-50g of explosives, not to mention it being under snow. To cut thick piece of steel like an I-beam you would need ALOT more.
Cyf531 3 years ago
2-5kg,inverse sq law: this would be expectable sound level from 60-100m
peterene 3 years ago
Err, log thing, mah bad. I guess it just blocked the sound from getting to you XD
Octopi1 3 years ago
I believe it could be because the snow muffled the explosion. And....to the people down below, well, of course you didn't HEAR the explosions, there were no charges to make the explosions, just planes! See? Simple. No charges, no conspriracy, no...ummm...mole people or anything else?
Octopi1 3 years ago
It is called a camera with a bad microphone, ever heard of it? If you have any experience with explosives then you would know how loud it really is.
chronopop 3 years ago 3
:( the video dont loads :(
Aanthanur 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
that's not silent and didn't do any damage.... you've gotta do better than that
bilracer 4 years ago
hmmm,aha,maybe it just only about my ears and eyes
peterene 4 years ago 4
That was actually pretty silent for an explosion of it's size. Try doing that with a cherry bomb.
screamosux 4 years ago
ok a cherry bomb is a low explosive if i were to guess he was using high explosives basically a cherry bomb wont do shit
kyubi890 3 years ago 2
'didn't do any damge'
it ripped the thing in half! half doesn't equal 'not any'
Blaze200038 3 years ago
thats what the linier shaped charge is supposed to do cut it in half not demolish it thats why they call them cutting charges
kyubi890 3 years ago 2
true, it didn't do any unintentional damage, which might have been what the person I was responding to meant.
Blaze200038 3 years ago
Virtually silent, like on 9/11
frostymxer 4 years ago 3
It was still louder than anything heard right before the bldgs collapsed on 9/11, and that was only one. To bring down the towers you would have needed 10's of thousands all going off at the same time to create what would have been the largest demolition attempt in history.
You must be sniffing glue to compare the sound of one little charge sitting in snow with that of the demolition of 270 floors of industrial steel.
jeffmay1 2 years ago
That explosion was NOT that loud and could easily be confused with a collapsing building. Who said that they only used linear charges anyway? I am positive they have explosives and technology up their sleeves we are not privy to.
frostymxer 2 years ago
Haha, secret demolition charges that the demolition industry doesn't know anything about. Too funny. Another conspiracy I guess. Another conspiracy within a conspiracy. Well, I guess if you can just keep making things up to fit your 9/11 conspiracy theory than you will never deal with logic. I mean, there were no loud explosions before the collapse, which is proof that it was demolished by explosives, but hey, no problem, you just make up that there are secret silent explosions. It'll never end!
jeffmay1 2 years ago
9/11 Commission Report bars 503 1st responder eyewitnesses
Iqph02WuE9g
frostymxer 2 years ago
There are many eye-witnesses who heard a number of explosions at the WTC complex. Many of them firefighters.
People in the lobby felt an explosion from the basement.
You can see the molten thermite dripping out the side of the building in one of the video clips.
In another clip shot 3 weeks after 9/11, they were pulling yellow-hot molten steel from "the pit". This stuff had a temperature of approx 1492 °C (2720 °F). Jet fuel simply CANNOT do that with it's 287.5 °C (549.5 °F) flame.
L00NGB00W 2 years ago
Of course many people heard explosions going off, they go off everywhere in a compromised bldg. But nobody mentioned bombs
What the people in the lobby felt was an explosion cause from the jet fuel travelling down the elevator shaft and exploding in the basement, well documented
If thermite brought down the bldg (impossible) it would take more than I little source in one corner in one bldg. You wouuld have to see that reaction all around both bldgs. Video evidence shows that you don't
jeffmay1 2 years ago
Thank you for not resorting to character attacks and name-calling. =)
I disagree that things just start exploding in compromised buildings.
Yes... The elevator shafts being a route for expanding gasses causing squibs is well documented.
Just like Lee Harvey Oswald is well documented as being JFK's assassin.
If you type 2012, you'll find that the world will end is well documented also.
Just because something is well documented doesn't make it true. "History is written by the victors".
L00NGB00W 2 years ago
What do we see in the videos?
Floors falling down one on top of the other. Also we see huge dust clouds. Which obscure almost everything (by design).
Think about this. As a floor of a building starts to give way, what is the weakest, most fragile thing to go first? The windows.
The absence of the windows would allow for the immediate release of any excess air-pressure caused by falling debris.
Not to mention the fact that if the ceiling above was already comprimised, air would easily escape.
L00NGB00W 2 years ago
In any big commercial bldg fire there are always small explosions -- no surprise to any fireman. The huge electrical transformers explode like mad, generators & fuel tanks, and bottled gas everywhere: acetylene, oxygen in maint. shops; oxygen, anesthetic in medical & dental offices & first aid rooms, propane & LPG in cafeterias & snack bars, fridges, air conditioning units etc. Even the sound of a pipe bursting can sound like an explosion when the pipes first burst, plus falling elevators
jeffmay1 2 years ago
That is a bit more clear.
Understandably, these things would go in any building fire, but these firemen found these explosion sounds all in sequence unusual enough to comment on afterwards.
"PoP! PoP! PoP! PoP! PoP! PoP! PoP! PoP! PoP!" ~NYC Firefighter
I concur that these sounds were caused by LSC's taking out the superstructure of the building. Which there IS evidence of.
Still images were taken from ground zero which show steel girders with perfect 45 degree diagonal cuts on them..
L00NGB00W 2 years ago
Which were done DURING THE F* CLEANUP, with lance torches, it isn't perfect, there's molten metal all over the place. Those charges don't leave unsteady cuts or molten metal. Further more, it's about a hundred times easier to wipe out the connections than the columns themselves. Even more, the buildings were completely capable of wiping themselves down once the collapses started.
Weirdo10o4 1 year ago
@Weirdo10o4
The point of that particular argument is, If you were cutting a beam for scrap, would you not take the shortest route of 90˚ or therebouts?
However 45˚ is an ideal angle for demolition.
L00NGB00W 1 year ago
"History is written by the victors"
That is your quote regarding my comments on the firefighters noticing that the front of bldg 7 was scooped out.
While I do not blame people for not trusting the gov't, or for at least having questions, I do not for one second thinkg that the fireman at ground zero on 9/11 were part of an "inside job". It is they that report the condition of
WTC7 before it's collapse. These are people that wake up everyday with a goal of saving lives, not destroying them
jeffmay1 2 years ago
Actually, that little cliche was in reference to the whole 911 scam and conspiracies in general.
This is actually the first I hear of Bldg. 7's front being scooped out. and reported by firefighters.
I totally agree with you on that point. The volunteers and firefighters who lent a hand on that tragic day, are heroes.
They sacrificed their health and lives to save others. They and their families were actually the ones to start the whole 911-truth movement in the first place.
L00NGB00W 2 years ago
um, jet fuel is, in its self an explosive.
dasgemuse 2 years ago
That's a logical fallacy, sir.
nehorlavazapalka 2 years ago
9/11?
peterene 4 years ago
what explosive did you use?ANNM?
Domnaek 5 years ago
mate, you mastered a shaped charge, hats off to you
ZootTron 5 years ago
where are the round drive platters?, looks fake to me.
iv81 5 years ago
Thats a cdrom drive
thegreendoctor 5 years ago
The explosion is'nt very impressive, but it looks like it could come in handy for making homemade explosives in the future.
Csp499 5 years ago
....you are an idiot.
lordNitrox 5 years ago
lol haha
davidalfredjames 5 years ago
The snow muffled the explosion
slither888 4 years ago
I'm not talking about the charge relative to environmental conditions, I'm talking about the explosion itself. Even if not muffled, the explosion would be small.
Csp499 4 years ago
And what experience with HEs has led you to this conclusion? I have personally witnessed charges in snow, it's very easy to underestimate the strength. Based on this guy's other videos and the length of that charge, I would have to say it would be fairly large.
slither888 4 years ago
Okay, then. If you're going to be defensive, then I'll just avoid argument.
Csp499 4 years ago