Not bad, the arrangement sounds a little like something from the "Tommy" period. RD's vocals would sound good enough to anyone who'd never heard the Andy Pratt version.
When I was a teenager I heard this once the DJ said the name but not who sang it ... I loved it and never heard it again. Before the days of instant technology you were screwed trying to track down a song. So here I am a couple dozen years later finding it on you tube ...what can I say ???
If you were in the Boston-Providence area listening to the radio during the summer of 1973, you'd absolutely know that Andy Pratt's original is far-far better!!
I'm surprised how many prefer this to Pratt's. I like Pratt's. But Daltrey is really right for it, too. Whoever said The rest of the Who should have done was right on. This could have been an epic who hit. Epic.
Wow, I just came across this today. In a lot of ways it is a complete reinterpretation by Daltry from Pratt's original(he rewrote the pronouns to make it completely from the first person), but it is a fusion between Daltry's rock and the melodic beeauty of Pratt that most impresses me! What do others thinks? I can't judge the two together because Pratt's original will always have a special place in my memory (Mom playing it when I was a kid on her stereo!!)
Although I surely prefer the magic and musicality of Andy Pratt's original, this one may explain why he never reached a mass audience. Subtlety and complexity mostly doesn't sell so easily or not at all. Roger Daltrey avoids all that, with this into-your-face version.
I love this song. I like both versions. Roger covered this well.
kmangel444 1 week ago
This isn't bad but too "forced" and hence not as good as Andy's.
kwixotic 3 months ago
have the album,been waitn on u tube!
kathymoore57 3 months ago
I like both versions, both very good, perhaps I like Andy's a tad better, but both are very good.
royalstarblue 6 months ago
Not bad, the arrangement sounds a little like something from the "Tommy" period. RD's vocals would sound good enough to anyone who'd never heard the Andy Pratt version.
lrd9999 6 months ago
When I was a teenager I heard this once the DJ said the name but not who sang it ... I loved it and never heard it again. Before the days of instant technology you were screwed trying to track down a song. So here I am a couple dozen years later finding it on you tube ...what can I say ???
fluffyweapon 7 months ago
If you were in the Boston-Providence area listening to the radio during the summer of 1973, you'd absolutely know that Andy Pratt's original is far-far better!!
merlinsdad01950 7 months ago
I also prefer Andy's version. But this one is good too.
rickster58 7 months ago
I'm surprised how many prefer this to Pratt's. I like Pratt's. But Daltrey is really right for it, too. Whoever said The rest of the Who should have done was right on. This could have been an epic who hit. Epic.
johnshipe 8 months ago 2
Ive never heard Roger's version before, its ok it could have been better... but i prefer Andy's..
springsteen96 10 months ago
Roger's best.
tommyrock69 10 months ago
Wow ! Love this ! Better than the original .
skunkdad7 10 months ago
Wow, I just came across this today. In a lot of ways it is a complete reinterpretation by Daltry from Pratt's original(he rewrote the pronouns to make it completely from the first person), but it is a fusion between Daltry's rock and the melodic beeauty of Pratt that most impresses me! What do others thinks? I can't judge the two together because Pratt's original will always have a special place in my memory (Mom playing it when I was a kid on her stereo!!)
juni0r75 11 months ago
Daltrey's version is one of those rare songs where the cover is better than the original.
sotampacane 11 months ago
The Who should have really covered this. I can just hear Townshend singing the woman's part.
glimmer2158 11 months ago
Comment removed
glimmer2158 11 months ago
Cool version. But it does not capture the brilliance of the original version by Andy Pratt.
dickshawny 1 year ago
Can't stand Andy Pratt's version but this is great!
chickengeorge69 1 year ago
Pretty good, but sound muddy compaired to Andy' Pratt's original.
crorivpro 1 year ago
A piece of advice: listen to Andy's version.
SurdinMusicUnlimited 1 year ago
@SurdinMusicUnlimited Did , this beats it all over town .
skunkdad7 10 months ago
Nice version of this one hit wonder by Andy Pratt.
theseventhprotocol 1 year ago
Although I surely prefer the magic and musicality of Andy Pratt's original, this one may explain why he never reached a mass audience. Subtlety and complexity mostly doesn't sell so easily or not at all. Roger Daltrey avoids all that, with this into-your-face version.
andzwe 1 year ago
@andzwe Sorry - just can't buy Pratt's falsetto. Roger and the Ox rule.
hrothgleas 1 year ago
Roger did good, but Andy's original blows it away! Everything about it is superior.
spyguys 1 year ago 2
Pretty cool...how can I get Roger to record one of my songs?
danmarg12 1 year ago
Comment removed
danmarg12 1 year ago
Okay but not nearly as good as Andy's amazing original
Ptrgamb 1 year ago
hi Roger
hi everybody
this is actually my song
blessings
andy pratt
recordsare 1 year ago
I like Rogers version for the low parts, but Andy's version for the high parts. That would be cool if they ever did this song on stage together.
Jgeneraledger23 1 year ago
great song!!!!!!!!
TheLibby3 1 year ago
Haven't heard this song since Slaton used to play it as my intro back in '89. Thanks! Anne (Avenging Annie ) Silberman
ansapo 1 year ago
tell all your friends about roger's monsternous
ScottLansky 1 year ago