To say one's an “MIT engineer” is to imply that one either teaches engineering at MIT or else otherwise worked for MIT as an engineer. Jeff King is not now nor has he ever been an MIT engineer, nor has he ever taught engineering or worked as an engineer for any university ever. He’s been a family doctor for at least 27 years and only received a joint biology/electrical engineering degree from MIT in 1974 to briefly work in medical devices before turning to medicine.
"The Commerce Department's National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) today announced details of its $16 million, 24-month federal building and fire safety investigation to study the structural failure and subsequent progressive collapse of several World Trade Center (WTC) buildings "
Now STFU moron I told you it was public record but you're too stupid to do that before making an ass of yourself.
I have a link to a petition on my profile to open up a new investigation into 911, you have the option of remaining anonymous. I have seen many signatures from around the world.
I really wonder what's going to happen when the truth finally comes out and people who have been blindly following the government about 9/11 understand what all that actually means?
When you factor in all the devious fake things the US has done for a century this is not too far fetched to believe.
Look and listen closely, he said he STUDIED at MIT not an MIT engineer. Also you cant dispute the physical evidence he points out. Wake up and stop being a slave.
This is a blatant lie. This talk was given on 9/11/04 that means that the $16M NIST investigation had been underway for 2 yrs!
"Aug. 21, 2002 ... (NIST) today announced details of its $16 million, 24-month federal building and fire safety investigation to study the structural failure and subsequent progressive collapse of several World Trade Center (WTC) buildings following the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001"
The inital budget for NIST WAS $16 M that's a matter of public record. Check for yourself( even check the "truther" sites )
Think on this, IT was CLINTON who cost the taxpayers all that money. If he'd admitted what he did up front then Ken Star wouldn't had to spend that money to eventually get to the truth!
@lawharrison That's right, it was about half, because the 9/11 commission was just writing a report. They weren't conducting the actual investigation. NIST was. So quit trying to be misleading.
@thedman113 the NIST report actually admitted that their computer models didnt show any collapse of the towers. epic fail for mentioning that in support of the official 9-11 fairytale in which the actual laws of reality need to be suspended in order to be facilitated. next.
Remember the May 2002 fiasco when Colin Powell declared that Castro had weapons of bio terror to justify an invasion- Jimmy Carter asked to see the intellegence report to which Powell admitted there wasn't one- its no secret but no one mentions it and how they did the exact same thing to invade Iraq; ie manufacture evidence, Carter and the entire UN know about it yet they all play dumb for us because they are hiding something.
There's a good book called Countdown to Terror about the CIA and the rogue CIA- its money laundering ,murders assassinations, subversion,drugs, organized crime, harbouring genocidal Nazis, Iran Contra, illegal wars, it explains alot of things- you realize there are Saddams and Ayatollahs and Stalins, the world is a messy dangerous place.
You should read Countdown to Terror- it talks alot about how the CIA sets up businesses and banking and money laundering schemes; Jimmy Carter naively dismantled the CIA which then went underground and got involved in the Iran/Contra scheme for one and also undermined Carter's effectiveness cause they weren't to happy to be out of work.
OK its an inside job-why is no one doing anything when Clinton and Nixon were brought down by mere petty indiscretions, it is very likely they knew, probably with absolute certainty about the attacks, in August2001 a Canadian newspaper warned of an imminent jihad attack- they all know including the media and I think the 911 Truth movement is just more of the same deceptive crap -of course its being monitored.
the same people who went after Clinton might be the same ones who planned 9-11.(if it was a inside job)
I only know official story is obviously a cover-up. Why did it take over 400 days to start investigation of 9-11 & then by friends of Bush?? Why wasn't a open scientific investigation started within a week?
How much money has been made by Bush's "friends" since 9-11? pretty convienent for them
Yeah well its way worse than that its been going on at least since WW2, its unreal the crimes these people commit, Nixon was likely going to expose it all, but if you think Bush is bad imagine a Stalin or a nuclear war or an all out anthrax attack- why do you think Clinton is hangin' with George senior?
do you have to be a engineer to see the obvious flaws in nist report? Does being a doctor make King wrong? Maybge The guys at 911myths & debunk911 have no qualifications at all. So why should we listen to anything they have to say? Kings at least has training & experience. Plus what he says is true
How do you know what he says is true- not saying it isn't true but the information is from a questionable source, Don't you have any curiosity as to why there aren't any qualified STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS disputing the official story why they have to put an orange banner in front of an MD and say "Real Genuine MIT Engineer" its called make-believe or in some situations- fraud.
In many ways the 911 truth is no different than the official story its political propaganda- they've already come to their conclusions and selectively twist and manipulate the facts to support their suspicions- there are many respected scientists,who have no bias either way, say 911 Truth has turned the scientific method on its head- wouldn't susprise me if 911Truth is a CIA operation.
Roodeey: I find that some sites do as you say but some just want more investigation. The difference between journalof911studies & 911myths is huge. 911myths is like politicians all bark but no substance. Journal at least discusses evidence & presents others who disagree with them. Plus it has people who are highly qualified & educated. who use scientific methods.
OK that sounds more reasonable, the journal- there are many strange and suspicious things about 911 et cetera but alot of the Truth movement is really more about frying the Bush Admin. but that doesn't quite make sense to me because Bush has real powerful enemies with more resources and know how than a bunch of people speculating on the internet.
In addition to every thing this guy said, it is a scienific fact that steale canot melt under normall conditions and that is the mane reason thugs like bush say it collapsed. The more I hear the TRUTH about what happened the more I see that the real heroes are the people who stand up to the tiranical christian thugs that rull every part of our life.
Here's some more Truth; Jeff King is an imposter, he's not an engineer from MIT- he is a medical doctor from California with a degree in Biology from MIT Class of 74- if you don't believe me check it out yourself. The "Truth Movement" must feel it is necessary to misrepresent Jeff King's credentials and that makes them liars.
but the important question is: is he right? You can dispute what he says but you would be wrong, because he is right. He never says he is a engineer, only that he trained at mit in engineering. which is true.
it can't melt or bend at temps nist has proof for, 250 C.( highest temps that they could find proof for at steel core, or perimeter columns) they say that fire in Oakland reached 3000 F, basically it was a gas powered torch, no reasonable person could compare that to WTC fires on 9-11
Do you know what happened to the gaslines in WTC, all of a sudden natural gas doesn't burn or explode on 911 because Dick Cheney shut the gas off because the explosion might prematurely set off the explosives that Starvin Marvin Bush planted in WTC
This guy is not with MIT. He's not an engineer, he's a physician, and has been for the last 24 years. From his own bio he doesn't say he majored in physics, so at best he took a class or two. His bio says he majored in biology and electrical engineering in 1974 and then practiced electrical engineering for eight years and then medicine for the last 24 years or so. He probably got his degree in biology and practiced some electrical engineering on the side to pay his way through med school.
Yeah Jeff King isn't a qualified engineer although he's deceptively portrayed as an MIT Engineer when he is in fact a medical doctor- that is fraudulent, but its OK to lie when your called the "Truth Movement" Get a qualified structural engineer to come forth and challenge the official theory- not a medical doctor misrepresented as an Engineer. Maybe he should go to an explosives expert for medical help.
They were all people killed or attempted to be killed by the banking elite throughout history. Oddly enough, they all worked to instill into the people's government a system that issued its own money interest and debt free. Coincidence I think not...
I've been on this pc for over 4 hours. Have tried dozens of sites to listen to Jeff King video and find not one clip that isn't broken into sound bites which makes this inaudible. The conspiracy is deafing to me now. We can't spread the truth if the internet is censored.
everyone keeps saying thermite was used.thermite charges can only be used on i beams or h colunms.the entire structure of both towers was made of box beams which cant be severed by directional charges .also if thermite was used on every shear cut there would be copper residue.343
The obvious use THERMITE is the main evidence or demolition. There is no way you can make aluminum from the planes appear red hot at the temperatures around 1800 degrees (remember the red hot stuff falling out of the building corners?). This is not even possible at temps approaching 6000 degrees!
The government claims that the planes were disentigrated from the 1800 degree heat (though [by some miracle], they found the passports of all of the terrorists).
Yeah because just before impact the terrorist jump out the front windshield and came down the elevator, dropped his I.D. ....OMG he's still out there!!
funny how his real name wasn't on the flight manifest but he got on the plane with his REAL passport knowing full well that he would have his bags and persons SEARCHED. What would have happened if security personnel had found this passport with a different name? "by way of deception, thou shall wage war". By the way, who is this anonymous person who found the passport? Very suspicous.
At least 0.13 pounds of thermite would be required to heat each pound of a steel section to the temperature at which steel weakens substantially. Therefore, many thousands of pounds of thermite would need to have been placed inconspicuously ahead of time, remotely ignited, and somehow held in direct contact with the surface of hundreds of massive structural components to weaken the building. This makes it an unlikely substance for achieving a controlled demolition.
Hey geo1671, you're a bigot and you're also wrong. The explosive demolition industry, as reflected in their publications and comments, thinks the planned demolition theory is BS. Check out implosionworld*com for a white paper debunking the demolition myth.
PoetryHound, I visited implosionworld*com and found no whitepaper or even mention of building 7. WTC7 that is. I have watched a video of a demolition expert admitting that WTC7 was absolutely a controlled demolition. His name was Danny jabcowski or something like that.
Guess what--all America's major explosive demo teams are Jewish owned and so is Washington and surprize--the FKN media. All Juice and plup wasted. Get my drift ?
"When I first saw the collapses, I was absolutely convinced that they were not spontaneous."
Really? What was your first clue? The giant airliners crashing into them? The fires that were burning? All the smoke? Wow. You had to go to college to figure that out? Your parents must be proud.
Lets not forget the endless ties between the Bush family and the Bin Ladens. Lets think about this a minute:
Bush...Bin Laden. Bush...Bin Laden. Not Gore..Bin Laden. Not Kerry...Bin Laden. Not even Bush and some other rich Arab family, Bush...Bin Laden. Doesnt any of you skeptics find this at least a little bit odd?
Don't try to discredit the messenger just because you can't handle the message. There are many many other scholars for 9/11 truth who all point to the obvious and painful video evidence. Watch the public source with an analytical mindset. Sure it was a painful event, but just for once, for science's sake, forget about the emotions and the loss of life, and examine the videos logically.
jeff king did indeed graduate in 1974 from MIT. however, it was with a bachelor's degree in BIOLOGY. that makes him an expert? he claims to be a physician, not a physicist. when he says "i studied physics at MIT" he can only mean he took freshman intro physics like everyone else did.
brain, security was lowered in the days before 911
Ground Zero Rally For Truth - Justice for the victims and their families, justice for the criminals. If you know anyone in NY tell them about this event.
damn that guy think they were built with explosives? that is rich hahahahaha one of the funniest things I ever heard... lets make a building designed so we can easily destroy it haha... so any unfortunate accident can occur and set them off haha
Hey dog liss'up. I think that theory is bogus too. There are a couple of others just as flakey. But the thing you might want to ask is why would our gov keep us in the dark by dodging the VALID unanswered questions for 5 years, dividing the people. Hint: Divide and conquer.
The core held the building up, the basements would be the best place to put thermite, the shutdowns in the weeks prior to 911 are suspect and could have been a planting operation for toher explosives higher up, there's a photo on the net of a fireman standing in front of a column which has been cut at 45degrees with rivulets of steel running down the face showing to camera - looks like thermite to me!
smart move if i was a creator in new york and i make a tower i would plant charges init so if something like this happens it wouldnt fall on others killing more..
ya know i would never wish death upon anyone but if i could save more lives i would do it
if you think you're so sure that its wasn't set up, watch the videos and try to disprove it to yourself. steel can't melt to jet fuel, its imposible. LOL, if that were the case (lets just say MAYBE), how safe would you feel flying in a hollow 747 with engines producing temperatures as high if not higher because its being fed a shitload of oxygen. it was set up.
The 436 ft. J.L. Hudson building built in 1911. It took 24 days, 4000+ explosive charges in 1100 locations, 36,000 feet of detonation wire, and 2700+ lbs. of explosives.
WTC:
TWO (2) 110-story towers at 1300+ ft each. 200,000 tons of steel each.
So, demos teams secretly wired the building and waited for the planes to hit them to push the button. Got it.
Everyone seems to forget that when watching a controlled demo, there are a series of explosions visible to everyone prior to the building coming down, and that a structure needs to be significantly weakend (the labor-intensive pre-demo work) for the building for fall as planned. No one working in WTC7 remembers seeing this activity?
What investigation of WTC7 occupants (CIA etc) are you basing this claim on? Squibs are visible as is white smoke & debris been thrown explosively outward. This was a demolition top down like a banana exploding it's contents. The labour had to concentrate on the core, give that a hefty charge & the building peels out & down. This is visual record as are the two commercial flights impact, their respective fireballs & eyewitness accounts from inside & the lobby in the hour prior to collapse.
In 1998, the 439 ft. tall Hudson Bldg was the tallest structural steel building ever imploded. It took 4000+ charges in 1100 locations, 2700 lb. of explosives and 36K ft of wire. The bldg was also pre-weakened up to 90% in many areas. So, 3 years later...
That is irrelevant. The nearby Olympia Stadiu, original home of the Detroit Red Wings, was built so strongly (with bricks and cinder blocks) it had to be dismantled without implosives. Nevertheless, one would not deny that many bldgs have been imploded, bldgs of various structures, styles etc.
It's useless. You guys WANT to believe our Govt did it, because it's more fun that way. Forget about the 1000's of radical militant Muslims with the long track record of hijackings, suicide bombings and hating the US.
Help me out here. Did FOX News or any of our other muted (ddju google zionism yet) news outlet, ever lay out exactly what the basis was for Muslims hating the US so much? Genetic? Magic beans? And why conclude we who simply want to know, must WANT to believe THIS. They know most USsheeples will choose fun at any cost, y'see. You're in da good ole see-em-comin tv-gen, there, bubs.
There will never be an investigation...even with the Dems in power and with Hillary as our next president. And if you think it's something bigger and more evil than that...then you're really outta luck.
I know! Dems and Republucans are the same party. They will never investigate this. Just like they will never investigate the Tsunami in 05. Large explosions were heard by fishermen close to the epicenter. There is a Harvard Prof. Daniel Schrag, who is has shown clear links between the China and N. Korea working on an off shore underwater nuke test secretly the same day!
The fact is that there was not enough heat from the JP4 to do this.
Ppl can eat all the bs they want from the government about this. It is not as if anyone is going to get them to admit it or even allow it to be properly investigated.
Planes have NEVER been totally incinerated from crashes.. yet it happened 3x that day? wake up
yeah, to be scared of brown people hating our freedom that live in caves who for some reason like to get carpet bombed and hunted. strange fetish i would say.
Oh Lord forgive them for they do.........blah blah blah. Lets put an end to this, let take a cardboard box with 1000's of holes. Now use baby powder to simulate crushed concrete. Now stomp the box and watch the squibs. The ground shook or did the photographer bump his leg against it. ok now watch the plant life come alive!
you dumb bastard. you're also assuming that the baby powder smashed the box (without stomping on it) seeing as the towers weren't 'stomped'....So, much like a tree turning to sawdust from the top down....it would be different if the top section was still somewhat in-tact found at the wreckage...but nope, there wasnt. the whole building was magically shredded but we are to believe the shredding simultaneously had the energy to crush the building.
nice try.except you didnt mention the massive energy it takes to pulverize concrete(and steel) into dust in the first place.certainly not a load of jet fuel which burnt out in 10 minutes.
its a sad thing what happened on 9/11, it touched every american. there is no "meaningful explanation of what happened to the buildings" some nut cases flew airplanes into a huge building full of people. trying to argue sill theories about it doesnt seem disrespectful to these people? no matter HOW it happened it happened, console yourself and get over it. ARE WE REALLY GOING TO LET TERRORISTS TURN OUR SUSPICIOU SEYES ON OURSELVES
watch these video's or at least the 1st two, the reason why putting bombs in the building is soo bad is b/c that means may others were in on it(like the owner of the WTC's)
its comments like that which will never allow the general public to open their eyes to what may have really happened on 911 and who was behind it. Yes, many died on that day but we should be passed the greiving part and actually do the RIGHT thing by investigating. I mean sure, in the beginning it IS hard to believe that our own government would stage such an event but when you look at all the evidence and what not it feels very possible.
quit posting your spam, none of your links have anything to do with jeff king or his studies, proving just how desperate you are to spread this filthy propaganda
i'm just trying to show people that the planes didn't take the WTC's down but the bombs did and when they see maybe it will get em to start thinking watch these video's or at least the 1st two
To say one's an “MIT engineer” is to imply that one either teaches engineering at MIT or else otherwise worked for MIT as an engineer. Jeff King is not now nor has he ever been an MIT engineer, nor has he ever taught engineering or worked as an engineer for any university ever. He’s been a family doctor for at least 27 years and only received a joint biology/electrical engineering degree from MIT in 1974 to briefly work in medical devices before turning to medicine.
Berkeley626 4 months ago
@MrJeggus
August 21, 2002
"The Commerce Department's National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) today announced details of its $16 million, 24-month federal building and fire safety investigation to study the structural failure and subsequent progressive collapse of several World Trade Center (WTC) buildings "
Now STFU moron I told you it was public record but you're too stupid to do that before making an ass of yourself.
Care to do it again ?
NWOisBS 1 year ago
WOW all these comments are about wether or not this guy is a "MIT engineer" or an "engineer from MIT"? This is what they want you to argue about
lawharrison 2 years ago
Yeah, it's kinda like Clinton saying "I did not have sexual relations with that woman"
It's a question of the "implied" credentials.
NWOisBS 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I have a link to a petition on my profile to open up a new investigation into 911, you have the option of remaining anonymous. I have seen many signatures from around the world.
Please sign and help spread the word.
Many thanks.
1,582 signatures so far !!
cosmicmind1 2 years ago
"MIT Engineer." lmao! Yeah right.
adkinsjr 2 years ago
I really wonder what's going to happen when the truth finally comes out and people who have been blindly following the government about 9/11 understand what all that actually means?
When you factor in all the devious fake things the US has done for a century this is not too far fetched to believe.
tyvolous1 2 years ago
are you mentally challenged?
cburrr123 1 year ago
Look and listen closely, he said he STUDIED at MIT not an MIT engineer. Also you cant dispute the physical evidence he points out. Wake up and stop being a slave.
zmhockey 2 years ago
@zmhockey Yes, I can dispute his 'evidence'. It has been debunked over and over again for years.
thedman113 1 year ago
Wow. Good video
VeronicaOlbrysh 3 years ago
If only Jeff King were actually an MIT engineer...
thedman113 4 years ago
Well he could be from one of the other MIT's
First there is
Middle Indiana Tonsorial college
then there is the
Massachusettes Institute of Turpsicore.
LOL
samh09 4 years ago
Prove he hasn't a degree from MIT in engineering then thedman113.
Go on.
You won't be able to because you're inference that he isn't a MIT engineer is a bare faced lie.
;)
KenfromDublin 3 years ago
Having a degree in engineering from MIT does NOT make one an "MIT Engineer". MIT engineers work at MIT in the engineering department. He does not.
Plus, his degree is in ELECTRICAL engineering. Maybe the towers were brought down by doorbells not being installed correctly.
thedman113 3 years ago 2
You still haven't proved he's not a MIT engineer - try again ;)
NIST can't explain the collapse of the twin towers so why should anyone take your treacherous sarcasm seriously.
KenfromDublin 3 years ago
"You still haven't proved he's not a MIT engineer - try again ;)"
On his own website, the guy admits he's a family doctor from California. He doesn't work at MIT as an engineer, nor has he ever.
thedman113 3 years ago
"The title "MIT Engineer" was not of my choosing, and I consider it somewhat misleading, though I did study Electrical Engineering at MIT" - Jeff King
Straight from the horse's ugh whatever
NWOisBS 3 years ago
@3:18 some moron put a caption
"Only $600,000 spent Investigating WTC"
This is a blatant lie. This talk was given on 9/11/04 that means that the $16M NIST investigation had been underway for 2 yrs!
"Aug. 21, 2002 ... (NIST) today announced details of its $16 million, 24-month federal building and fire safety investigation to study the structural failure and subsequent progressive collapse of several World Trade Center (WTC) buildings following the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001"
NWOisBS 3 years ago
I think the origonal 911 commission budget was only 4 million. Thats half of what was spent to investigate Clintons BJ scandal.
lawharrison 2 years ago 2
The inital budget for NIST WAS $16 M that's a matter of public record. Check for yourself( even check the "truther" sites )
Think on this, IT was CLINTON who cost the taxpayers all that money. If he'd admitted what he did up front then Ken Star wouldn't had to spend that money to eventually get to the truth!
NWOisBS 2 years ago
@lawharrison That's right, it was about half, because the 9/11 commission was just writing a report. They weren't conducting the actual investigation. NIST was. So quit trying to be misleading.
thedman113 1 year ago
@thedman113 the NIST report actually admitted that their computer models didnt show any collapse of the towers. epic fail for mentioning that in support of the official 9-11 fairytale in which the actual laws of reality need to be suspended in order to be facilitated. next.
PFCAhammed 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@PFCAhammed No, they didn't. Start living in the real world.
thedman113 1 year ago
Remember the May 2002 fiasco when Colin Powell declared that Castro had weapons of bio terror to justify an invasion- Jimmy Carter asked to see the intellegence report to which Powell admitted there wasn't one- its no secret but no one mentions it and how they did the exact same thing to invade Iraq; ie manufacture evidence, Carter and the entire UN know about it yet they all play dumb for us because they are hiding something.
roodeey 4 years ago
There's a good book called Countdown to Terror about the CIA and the rogue CIA- its money laundering ,murders assassinations, subversion,drugs, organized crime, harbouring genocidal Nazis, Iran Contra, illegal wars, it explains alot of things- you realize there are Saddams and Ayatollahs and Stalins, the world is a messy dangerous place.
roodeey 4 years ago
roodeey:search federal reserve, or rothchilds on youtube there are some interesting videos about history of modern banking.
lisabob22 4 years ago
You should read Countdown to Terror- it talks alot about how the CIA sets up businesses and banking and money laundering schemes; Jimmy Carter naively dismantled the CIA which then went underground and got involved in the Iran/Contra scheme for one and also undermined Carter's effectiveness cause they weren't to happy to be out of work.
roodeey 4 years ago
OK its an inside job-why is no one doing anything when Clinton and Nixon were brought down by mere petty indiscretions, it is very likely they knew, probably with absolute certainty about the attacks, in August2001 a Canadian newspaper warned of an imminent jihad attack- they all know including the media and I think the 911 Truth movement is just more of the same deceptive crap -of course its being monitored.
roodeey 4 years ago
the same people who went after Clinton might be the same ones who planned 9-11.(if it was a inside job)
I only know official story is obviously a cover-up. Why did it take over 400 days to start investigation of 9-11 & then by friends of Bush?? Why wasn't a open scientific investigation started within a week?
How much money has been made by Bush's "friends" since 9-11? pretty convienent for them
lisabob22 4 years ago
Yeah well its way worse than that its been going on at least since WW2, its unreal the crimes these people commit, Nixon was likely going to expose it all, but if you think Bush is bad imagine a Stalin or a nuclear war or an all out anthrax attack- why do you think Clinton is hangin' with George senior?
We don't know tho' what's really going on
roodeey 4 years ago
do you have to be a engineer to see the obvious flaws in nist report? Does being a doctor make King wrong? Maybge The guys at 911myths & debunk911 have no qualifications at all. So why should we listen to anything they have to say? Kings at least has training & experience. Plus what he says is true
lisabob22 4 years ago
How do you know what he says is true- not saying it isn't true but the information is from a questionable source, Don't you have any curiosity as to why there aren't any qualified STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS disputing the official story why they have to put an orange banner in front of an MD and say "Real Genuine MIT Engineer" its called make-believe or in some situations- fraud.
roodeey 4 years ago
I have checked the sources and I have found that his statements are backed up by evidence & other experts.
I don't know 100% that it is true only that I can verify it & it makes more sense than official theory.
ae911truth org & journalof911studies com check it out
lisabob22 4 years ago
In many ways the 911 truth is no different than the official story its political propaganda- they've already come to their conclusions and selectively twist and manipulate the facts to support their suspicions- there are many respected scientists,who have no bias either way, say 911 Truth has turned the scientific method on its head- wouldn't susprise me if 911Truth is a CIA operation.
roodeey 4 years ago
Roodeey: I find that some sites do as you say but some just want more investigation. The difference between journalof911studies & 911myths is huge. 911myths is like politicians all bark but no substance. Journal at least discusses evidence & presents others who disagree with them. Plus it has people who are highly qualified & educated. who use scientific methods.
lisabob22 4 years ago
OK that sounds more reasonable, the journal- there are many strange and suspicious things about 911 et cetera but alot of the Truth movement is really more about frying the Bush Admin. but that doesn't quite make sense to me because Bush has real powerful enemies with more resources and know how than a bunch of people speculating on the internet.
roodeey 4 years ago
Please go to our MIT site on this subject.
web dot mit dot edu/newsoffice/nr/2001/911.html
urbanepic 4 years ago
better to go to ae911truth org or journalof911studies com for real facts & evidence, not improbable theories.
lisabob22 4 years ago
In addition to every thing this guy said, it is a scienific fact that steale canot melt under normall conditions and that is the mane reason thugs like bush say it collapsed. The more I hear the TRUTH about what happened the more I see that the real heroes are the people who stand up to the tiranical christian thugs that rull every part of our life.
tnioptsew 4 years ago
Here's some more Truth; Jeff King is an imposter, he's not an engineer from MIT- he is a medical doctor from California with a degree in Biology from MIT Class of 74- if you don't believe me check it out yourself. The "Truth Movement" must feel it is necessary to misrepresent Jeff King's credentials and that makes them liars.
roodeey 4 years ago
but the important question is: is he right? You can dispute what he says but you would be wrong, because he is right. He never says he is a engineer, only that he trained at mit in engineering. which is true.
lisabob22 4 years ago
Really, it can't melt or bend? Maybe you should look at the OAkland Highway Collapse.
ishmaiden 4 years ago
it can't melt or bend at temps nist has proof for, 250 C.( highest temps that they could find proof for at steel core, or perimeter columns) they say that fire in Oakland reached 3000 F, basically it was a gas powered torch, no reasonable person could compare that to WTC fires on 9-11
lisabob22 4 years ago
Do you know what happened to the gaslines in WTC, all of a sudden natural gas doesn't burn or explode on 911 because Dick Cheney shut the gas off because the explosion might prematurely set off the explosives that Starvin Marvin Bush planted in WTC
roodeey 4 years ago
This guy never pretends to be an expert in physics, just to have studied it at MIT. He says so...with HIS MOUTH!
moichidomoichido 4 years ago
This guy is not with MIT. He's not an engineer, he's a physician, and has been for the last 24 years. From his own bio he doesn't say he majored in physics, so at best he took a class or two. His bio says he majored in biology and electrical engineering in 1974 and then practiced electrical engineering for eight years and then medicine for the last 24 years or so. He probably got his degree in biology and practiced some electrical engineering on the side to pay his way through med school.
Berkeley626 4 years ago
Yeah Jeff King isn't a qualified engineer although he's deceptively portrayed as an MIT Engineer when he is in fact a medical doctor- that is fraudulent, but its OK to lie when your called the "Truth Movement" Get a qualified structural engineer to come forth and challenge the official theory- not a medical doctor misrepresented as an Engineer. Maybe he should go to an explosives expert for medical help.
roodeey 4 years ago
Check out: Freedom to Fascism
What do these men have in common?
-Julius Ceasar
-Abraham Lincoln
-Andrew Jackson
-James Garfield
-Congressman McFadden
-John Francis Kennedy
They were all people killed or attempted to be killed by the banking elite throughout history. Oddly enough, they all worked to instill into the people's government a system that issued its own money interest and debt free. Coincidence I think not...
snipboy 5 years ago
Julius Ceasar was killed for staining the honour of the Empire for allowing what they saw as barbarians into the senate,but yes to the rest
YoJimBobaJoeThe2nd 5 years ago
I've been on this pc for over 4 hours. Have tried dozens of sites to listen to Jeff King video and find not one clip that isn't broken into sound bites which makes this inaudible. The conspiracy is deafing to me now. We can't spread the truth if the internet is censored.
maggiebott 5 years ago
MIT, eh? cee dot mit dot edu/index dot pl?iid=3721&isa=Category debunking911 dot com
PkofPk 5 years ago
everyone keeps saying thermite was used.thermite charges can only be used on i beams or h colunms.the entire structure of both towers was made of box beams which cant be severed by directional charges .also if thermite was used on every shear cut there would be copper residue.343
gndzroirnwkr 5 years ago
Thankyou - a voice of reason in the USA.
icboulton 5 years ago
Sleep Sleep Sleep Sleep SLEEEEEEEEEP.
stabbagepatch 5 years ago
The obvious use THERMITE is the main evidence or demolition. There is no way you can make aluminum from the planes appear red hot at the temperatures around 1800 degrees (remember the red hot stuff falling out of the building corners?). This is not even possible at temps approaching 6000 degrees!
The government claims that the planes were disentigrated from the 1800 degree heat (though [by some miracle], they found the passports of all of the terrorists).
Wake up ppl...
RooFx 5 years ago
Yeah because just before impact the terrorist jump out the front windshield and came down the elevator, dropped his I.D. ....OMG he's still out there!!
msp1972 5 years ago
funny how his real name wasn't on the flight manifest but he got on the plane with his REAL passport knowing full well that he would have his bags and persons SEARCHED. What would have happened if security personnel had found this passport with a different name? "by way of deception, thou shall wage war". By the way, who is this anonymous person who found the passport? Very suspicous.
moichidomoichido 4 years ago
good point dude, never thought about that. :)
323157 4 years ago
At least 0.13 pounds of thermite would be required to heat each pound of a steel section to the temperature at which steel weakens substantially. Therefore, many thousands of pounds of thermite would need to have been placed inconspicuously ahead of time, remotely ignited, and somehow held in direct contact with the surface of hundreds of massive structural components to weaken the building. This makes it an unlikely substance for achieving a controlled demolition.
thedman113 5 years ago
Hey geo1671, you're a bigot and you're also wrong. The explosive demolition industry, as reflected in their publications and comments, thinks the planned demolition theory is BS. Check out implosionworld*com for a white paper debunking the demolition myth.
PoetryHound 5 years ago
PoetryHound, I visited implosionworld*com and found no whitepaper or even mention of building 7. WTC7 that is. I have watched a video of a demolition expert admitting that WTC7 was absolutely a controlled demolition. His name was Danny jabcowski or something like that.
moichidomoichido 4 years ago
Guess what--all America's major explosive demo teams are Jewish owned and so is Washington and surprize--the FKN media. All Juice and plup wasted. Get my drift ?
geo1671 5 years ago
Sure, I get your drift. You're anti-Semitic, that's all. What's next? The Holocaust never happened? What an ignorant dope.
PoetryHound 5 years ago
You actually believe that? if so, you are a true moron.
digammo 5 years ago
And you would be an expert on true morons, how??
codevictim 5 years ago
"When I first saw the collapses, I was absolutely convinced that they were not spontaneous."
Really? What was your first clue? The giant airliners crashing into them? The fires that were burning? All the smoke? Wow. You had to go to college to figure that out? Your parents must be proud.
FWPB 5 years ago
Lets not forget the endless ties between the Bush family and the Bin Ladens. Lets think about this a minute:
Bush...Bin Laden. Bush...Bin Laden. Not Gore..Bin Laden. Not Kerry...Bin Laden. Not even Bush and some other rich Arab family, Bush...Bin Laden. Doesnt any of you skeptics find this at least a little bit odd?
JakeBudz 5 years ago
there is not such a blind person that the one that doesn't wnat to see.
strunz21 5 years ago
Don't try to discredit the messenger just because you can't handle the message. There are many many other scholars for 9/11 truth who all point to the obvious and painful video evidence. Watch the public source with an analytical mindset. Sure it was a painful event, but just for once, for science's sake, forget about the emotions and the loss of life, and examine the videos logically.
lfl420 5 years ago
jeff king did indeed graduate in 1974 from MIT. however, it was with a bachelor's degree in BIOLOGY. that makes him an expert? he claims to be a physician, not a physicist. when he says "i studied physics at MIT" he can only mean he took freshman intro physics like everyone else did.
idontwannaregister 5 years ago
brain, security was lowered in the days before 911
Ground Zero Rally For Truth - Justice for the victims and their families, justice for the criminals. If you know anyone in NY tell them about this event.
ny911truth_org/events/5th_anniversary.htm
bushstole04_com/911_five_year_anniversarydeman.htm
uselogic 5 years ago
Ummm, Wrong! Security was heightened prior to 911, in the days immediately preceding 911 security went back to NORMAL!
fitzbone 5 years ago
damn that guy think they were built with explosives? that is rich hahahahaha one of the funniest things I ever heard... lets make a building designed so we can easily destroy it haha... so any unfortunate accident can occur and set them off haha
brainphreak 5 years ago
Hey dog liss'up. I think that theory is bogus too. There are a couple of others just as flakey. But the thing you might want to ask is why would our gov keep us in the dark by dodging the VALID unanswered questions for 5 years, dividing the people. Hint: Divide and conquer.
codevictim 5 years ago
The core held the building up, the basements would be the best place to put thermite, the shutdowns in the weeks prior to 911 are suspect and could have been a planting operation for toher explosives higher up, there's a photo on the net of a fireman standing in front of a column which has been cut at 45degrees with rivulets of steel running down the face showing to camera - looks like thermite to me!
SamE138 5 years ago
smart move if i was a creator in new york and i make a tower i would plant charges init so if something like this happens it wouldnt fall on others killing more..
ya know i would never wish death upon anyone but if i could save more lives i would do it
666mas 5 years ago
Hahahahahah.. sorry. that was a good one.
p0llenp0ny 5 years ago
i am right
666mas 5 years ago
Whatever helps you sleep at night.
p0llenp0ny 5 years ago
YAH, BUT THEN AGAIN, YOUR A MORON.
moichidomoichido 4 years ago
"You're." You are.
ikemikulla 4 years ago
if you think you're so sure that its wasn't set up, watch the videos and try to disprove it to yourself. steel can't melt to jet fuel, its imposible. LOL, if that were the case (lets just say MAYBE), how safe would you feel flying in a hollow 747 with engines producing temperatures as high if not higher because its being fed a shitload of oxygen. it was set up.
tbow073 5 years ago
The previous world record:
The 436 ft. J.L. Hudson building built in 1911. It took 24 days, 4000+ explosive charges in 1100 locations, 36,000 feet of detonation wire, and 2700+ lbs. of explosives.
WTC:
TWO (2) 110-story towers at 1300+ ft each. 200,000 tons of steel each.
So, demos teams secretly wired the building and waited for the planes to hit them to push the button. Got it.
digammo 5 years ago
Yep, exactamundo, BIG demo teams, BIG thermate packs, BIG drills, BIG planes, BIG button. BIG Internet so get used to it BIGBOY.
reginald22 5 years ago
Everyone seems to forget that when watching a controlled demo, there are a series of explosions visible to everyone prior to the building coming down, and that a structure needs to be significantly weakend (the labor-intensive pre-demo work) for the building for fall as planned. No one working in WTC7 remembers seeing this activity?
digammo 5 years ago
What investigation of WTC7 occupants (CIA etc) are you basing this claim on? Squibs are visible as is white smoke & debris been thrown explosively outward. This was a demolition top down like a banana exploding it's contents. The labour had to concentrate on the core, give that a hefty charge & the building peels out & down. This is visual record as are the two commercial flights impact, their respective fireballs & eyewitness accounts from inside & the lobby in the hour prior to collapse.
reginald22 5 years ago
http://www.engr.psu.edu/ae/WTC/WTCend.gif
digammo 5 years ago
"No one working in WTC7 remembers seeing this activity?" See: Unusual Evacuations & Power-Downs
geomusic 5 years ago
In 1998, the 439 ft. tall Hudson Bldg was the tallest structural steel building ever imploded. It took 4000+ charges in 1100 locations, 2700 lb. of explosives and 36K ft of wire. The bldg was also pre-weakened up to 90% in many areas. So, 3 years later...
digammo 5 years ago
That is irrelevant. The nearby Olympia Stadiu, original home of the Detroit Red Wings, was built so strongly (with bricks and cinder blocks) it had to be dismantled without implosives. Nevertheless, one would not deny that many bldgs have been imploded, bldgs of various structures, styles etc.
cccp72 5 years ago
It's useless. You guys WANT to believe our Govt did it, because it's more fun that way. Forget about the 1000's of radical militant Muslims with the long track record of hijackings, suicide bombings and hating the US.
digammo 5 years ago
Help me out here. Did FOX News or any of our other muted (ddju google zionism yet) news outlet, ever lay out exactly what the basis was for Muslims hating the US so much? Genetic? Magic beans? And why conclude we who simply want to know, must WANT to believe THIS. They know most USsheeples will choose fun at any cost, y'see. You're in da good ole see-em-comin tv-gen, there, bubs.
codevictim 5 years ago
There will never be an investigation...even with the Dems in power and with Hillary as our next president. And if you think it's something bigger and more evil than that...then you're really outta luck.
digammo 5 years ago
I know! Dems and Republucans are the same party. They will never investigate this. Just like they will never investigate the Tsunami in 05. Large explosions were heard by fishermen close to the epicenter. There is a Harvard Prof. Daniel Schrag, who is has shown clear links between the China and N. Korea working on an off shore underwater nuke test secretly the same day!
somedirtyhippie 5 years ago
...WTC 1, 2 & 7 are all prepped secretly with a couple evacuations and power downs? Impossible.
digammo 5 years ago
Apparently this courageous American patriot couldn't even make the time to google the Silverstein "Pull it." (WTC 7) interview video?
codevictim 5 years ago
"Apparently this courageous American patriot couldn't even make the time to google the Silverstein "Pull it." (WTC 7) interview video?"
Of course not, Myspace, youtube and hotnakedmen(dotcom) are the only things this dork knows how to access.
moichidomoichido 4 years ago
previous world record for what?
boomshakk 5 years ago
The power of computers are amazing, yes.
And 95 years ago we had little experience in controlled demolitions, you silly goose.
RooFx 5 years ago
does this look controlled?
http://63.134.205.116/wtccrunch.jpg
digammo 5 years ago
In a word.. yes.
The fact is that there was not enough heat from the JP4 to do this.
Ppl can eat all the bs they want from the government about this. It is not as if anyone is going to get them to admit it or even allow it to be properly investigated.
Planes have NEVER been totally incinerated from crashes.. yet it happened 3x that day? wake up
RooFx 5 years ago
It's fun to be paranoid, huh?
digammo 5 years ago
yeah, to be scared of brown people hating our freedom that live in caves who for some reason like to get carpet bombed and hunted. strange fetish i would say.
Thrashaero 5 years ago
Oh Lord forgive them for they do.........blah blah blah. Lets put an end to this, let take a cardboard box with 1000's of holes. Now use baby powder to simulate crushed concrete. Now stomp the box and watch the squibs. The ground shook or did the photographer bump his leg against it. ok now watch the plant life come alive!
msp1972 5 years ago
you dumb bastard. you're also assuming that the baby powder smashed the box (without stomping on it) seeing as the towers weren't 'stomped'....So, much like a tree turning to sawdust from the top down....it would be different if the top section was still somewhat in-tact found at the wreckage...but nope, there wasnt. the whole building was magically shredded but we are to believe the shredding simultaneously had the energy to crush the building.
Thrashaero 5 years ago
no fucktard...press it from the top. Tell me...before I waste my fingers, you weren't top of your engineering class were you.
msp1972 5 years ago
nice try.except you didnt mention the massive energy it takes to pulverize concrete(and steel) into dust in the first place.certainly not a load of jet fuel which burnt out in 10 minutes.
boomshakk 5 years ago
What da? Huh?
ragsnac 5 years ago
its a sad thing what happened on 9/11, it touched every american. there is no "meaningful explanation of what happened to the buildings" some nut cases flew airplanes into a huge building full of people. trying to argue sill theories about it doesnt seem disrespectful to these people? no matter HOW it happened it happened, console yourself and get over it. ARE WE REALLY GOING TO LET TERRORISTS TURN OUR SUSPICIOU SEYES ON OURSELVES
HOHsmokeyk9 5 years ago
watch these video's or at least the 1st two, the reason why putting bombs in the building is soo bad is b/c that means may others were in on it(like the owner of the WTC's)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XL4isaZRapY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=saICe3domSE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=McRRD_XbHUQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vDY6LIKZmIA
nickv11763 5 years ago
Nick.. Eyyym, the WTC was over 385 million dollars in debt.
Not to mention that DNA becomes unusable at temps over about 180 degrees F. I think things were a little hotter than that where the planes hit.
RooFx 5 years ago
dude i know i don't think you read what i wrote wrong i'm on your side
nickv11763 5 years ago
What terrorists?
ragsnac 5 years ago
its comments like that which will never allow the general public to open their eyes to what may have really happened on 911 and who was behind it. Yes, many died on that day but we should be passed the greiving part and actually do the RIGHT thing by investigating. I mean sure, in the beginning it IS hard to believe that our own government would stage such an event but when you look at all the evidence and what not it feels very possible.
christpunchers 5 years ago
quit posting your spam, none of your links have anything to do with jeff king or his studies, proving just how desperate you are to spread this filthy propaganda
www.physics911.net
rapsody 5 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Debunking 911 Conspiracy Theories
http://www.geocities.com/debunking911
911 Myths
http://www.911myths.com
Loose Change Viewer Guide
http://www.ccdominoes.com/lc/LooseChangeGuide.html
Counter-video of Loose Change
http://www.lolloosechange.co.nr
911 Conspiracy Smasher
http://911conspiracysmasher.blogspot.com
PkofPk 5 years ago
i'm just trying to show people that the planes didn't take the WTC's down but the bombs did and when they see maybe it will get em to start thinking watch these video's or at least the 1st two
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XL4isaZRapY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=saICe3domSE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_oi3-pojxD4
nickv11763 5 years ago
thanks for uploading this video.
danmang 5 years ago
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/wtc2_floor78.html
tellthetruth 5 years ago
http://www.link4u.com/candle.htm
tellthetruth 5 years ago
http://911blimp.net/
tellthetruth 5 years ago
http://www.gratefulness.org/candles/enter.cfm?l=eng
tellthetruth 5 years ago