the implications for dna programming seem scary nonetheless. people can already hack matter without computers, thier genetics are just transferred to whatever holds it (any kind of matter/condensed vibration) butterfly effect
This has metaphysical implications: if Paul Rothemund took his knowledge and the time and effort to make a simple nano-smiley face with DNA, then what about the much more complex protein structures of the natural world. In our experience, transforming matter through a complex information process is a relic of intelligence. Information implies an Informant.
wow this has absolutly no potential for abuse. as if controling peoples brain activity with televisions wasnt enough they will soon be able to program your DNA. atleast with TV's you can make the choice not to watch them and avoid the trance/alzhiemers bullet, this however can be administered to the worlds middle and lower class populations against their will and without their knowledge effortlessly. great....
Hacking matter!! wow this is some amazing stuff!! Just imagine the possibilities... the analogy to spells is correct because if this takes off -like I think it will- then you people who don't understand this are going to be left thinking "it is magic!" and the technology gap is going to be HUGE.. if some of you are scare and confuse now wait another 10 years... amazing..
its so disgusting to see orthodox scientists pretending not to follow whats being presented just because the "spell" word was mentioned. i'm starting to believe the idea that science is a religious order.
einstein said "highly developed spirits have always encountered great resistance from mediocre minds". This guy is one of those spirits...you people calling him scary/nerd/weird are mediocre and will continue to be so until you sack up, let go of those fragile little egos, and realize that calling people names is for second graders. Paul...you and your work are amazing, thank you. Don't ever get sidetracked by insignificant jeerers with nothing better to do with themselves.
You're perfectly right, the TED talks are about like a beauty contest. Their objective is more shock value than anything else, that immediate attention grabber seems to take precedence over everything else. Even on youtube, much better more in depth talks are out there.
But they do something that common researchers often outright ignore. Explaining stuff simply and connecting to people.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
this guy is weird he trys so hard to sound smart and intelligent but he sounds like an idiot, I dont know if his main subject is computers, DNA, or spells and wizards. It just sounds like a whole lot of disorganized thinking. I hope that he's not a real professor because his students will learn nothing. Then he has audacity to tell the audience that because they didn't understand him they had insecure thinking. I wonder if the guy who posted this knows what the hell he's talking about exactly.
Yeah, probably M13 or M1 bacteriophage. They are easy to grow on bacterial cultures (petri dishes or test tubes) and they are short and simple. M13 is kind of the lab rat of the viral world. We use it a lot for DNA sequences... kind a legacy from the early days. I think it might have been the first virus to be sequenced.
hes talking about the transformation of information into matter, like a wizard casting a spell (speaking information), to create an effect (matter is affected, produced, ect)
but thats probably too phylosophically for the ordinary youtube community to fully understand.
The point of what this guy is doing is that for now, he can create microscopic shapes and patterns, but in the future he can create micro-microprocessors.
Imagine the computing power of a computer chip that can build itself and is 3 dimensional instead of the 2D layered chips we have now.
That is what he was talking about with the programing and compiling of protein molecules.
Well yes, perhaps I was being to fast and to short here... Anybody with a little knowledge about DNA selfassembly (so probably quite a good portion of the TED audience) understands the goal, but i think the intresting question is how ...
I'm a computer scientist with an interest in biology, so I had no problem with it. I like the idea, I just think it deserves a more detailed and better-paced exposition.
I'd also like to know what he thinks the eventual "kill application" for the technology will be. Maybe reduced costs for synthesizing substances?
This is not an "exchange". Certainly not very scientific (are they handing out research papers with testable data?). I have to wonder who is the audience for this stuff? It may be good to show it to kids to develop an interest in Science/Technology which is sorely needed, but otherwise it seems like prostitution of Science to folks who cant possibly understand the subject on any useful level to exchange anything except for money.
the audience are business people looking to see what the nerds are studying and how they can make money of them by giving them funds($)oin their projects
if it took a year to make a star, then it's going to take a while to make a human, but ehy would you want to make a human? couldn't you use it to repair body parts?
Well yes, I believe that would be one of the goals, perhaps even organs that have your exact DNA and would never be rejekted by your body, but perhaps some micro machinery two like a kind of snow plow, that can clear blodvessels from blockages, or ... well really the amount of useful things we could make by fully understanding this is incomprehensibly large...
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Every inventor should ask themselves, "What could an absolute dictator with an army, a secret police, and entire economy at his disposal do with my invention?"
yeah, but then we would still be living naked in caves. Instead what everyone should be asking themselves is "How can I make a positive change to whats around me" and get off their lazy asses. Sticking your head in the sand isn't a plan for the future. dude.
Robert Oppenheimer, "father of the atomic bomb", was not a lazy cave dweller.
And yet after seeing two Japanese cities worth of people burned to a crisp with the weapon he ushered in to existence, he quoted the Bhagavad Gita: "If the radiance of a thousand suns were to burst at once into the sky, that would be like the splendor of the mighty one. Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds."
So what can an absolute dictator with an army do with his invention?
Yeah, what have they done? Nothing. But Robert should of seen it coming, after all it was a "bomb". Infact more people have died from light arms in the hands children than by bombs, period. Apparently box cutters were used to crash 2 plaines into the twin towers. Did you guy who made the box cutter stop to think about "evil" dictators.
What stops dictators is not trying and halt all technological progress to remove all the potential weapons in the world, as this is (a) impossible (b) technology generally helps more than harms (see radiology as an example). What stops dictators is educated people. Education can has and will change the world for the better. Trying to remain ignorant has always lead to war (see Nazi Germany for examples).
the power to make anything from nothing would make new masters in the world. Only the filthy rich would have the machine to replicate. The whole world would go into chaos .. what would people do for work ? who would control the powerful ? George Orwell here we come
That's a great idea. What'd be even better would be being able to design a filter that makes use of the same kind of passive/active transport structures used by cells. Of course, some of them would need to be powered by ATP, which might be a bit of a drag.
the implications for dna programming seem scary nonetheless. people can already hack matter without computers, thier genetics are just transferred to whatever holds it (any kind of matter/condensed vibration) butterfly effect
acidbath32 1 month ago
this is nice but the talk on DNA Folding he gave is truly jaw-dropping. go find it!
PlanetBongoSan 1 year ago
This has metaphysical implications: if Paul Rothemund took his knowledge and the time and effort to make a simple nano-smiley face with DNA, then what about the much more complex protein structures of the natural world. In our experience, transforming matter through a complex information process is a relic of intelligence. Information implies an Informant.
TheRonMorales 1 year ago
Holy shit! That is cool, and quite scary.
Someone needs to appoint this guy as leader of the world or something. Super intelligent.
Aidsus 1 year ago
Fuckin' GENIUS
rozekei 1 year ago
wow this has absolutly no potential for abuse. as if controling peoples brain activity with televisions wasnt enough they will soon be able to program your DNA. atleast with TV's you can make the choice not to watch them and avoid the trance/alzhiemers bullet, this however can be administered to the worlds middle and lower class populations against their will and without their knowledge effortlessly. great....
AENIMA42069 1 year ago
Hacking matter!! wow this is some amazing stuff!! Just imagine the possibilities... the analogy to spells is correct because if this takes off -like I think it will- then you people who don't understand this are going to be left thinking "it is magic!" and the technology gap is going to be HUGE.. if some of you are scare and confuse now wait another 10 years... amazing..
JoshuaAmaro 2 years ago
its so disgusting to see orthodox scientists pretending not to follow whats being presented just because the "spell" word was mentioned. i'm starting to believe the idea that science is a religious order.
ajlexander 2 years ago
@ajlexander that would imply that quantum physics is a mindsnare!!
acidbath32 1 month ago
einstein said "highly developed spirits have always encountered great resistance from mediocre minds". This guy is one of those spirits...you people calling him scary/nerd/weird are mediocre and will continue to be so until you sack up, let go of those fragile little egos, and realize that calling people names is for second graders. Paul...you and your work are amazing, thank you. Don't ever get sidetracked by insignificant jeerers with nothing better to do with themselves.
Stickstacks12 3 years ago 9
You're perfectly right, the TED talks are about like a beauty contest. Their objective is more shock value than anything else, that immediate attention grabber seems to take precedence over everything else. Even on youtube, much better more in depth talks are out there.
But they do something that common researchers often outright ignore. Explaining stuff simply and connecting to people.
zassounotsukushi 3 years ago 3
the end of man cometh!!!
nicholai369 3 years ago
the end of man cometh here comes woman hear her roar.
Unityspirit50 2 years ago
I noticed Tony Robbins in the audience..
melindajlaidlaw 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this guy is weird he trys so hard to sound smart and intelligent but he sounds like an idiot, I dont know if his main subject is computers, DNA, or spells and wizards. It just sounds like a whole lot of disorganized thinking. I hope that he's not a real professor because his students will learn nothing. Then he has audacity to tell the audience that because they didn't understand him they had insecure thinking. I wonder if the guy who posted this knows what the hell he's talking about exactly.
futureneurologist 3 years ago
just nervous...
melindajlaidlaw 3 years ago
if you dont know what hes talking about ur the idiot. "insecure thinking" not even close lol
ArchCapa 3 years ago
here come the drones! awesome
lysergicaddict 4 years ago
Ive stolen from a virus??!??!
OMGLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL 4 years ago
Yeah, probably M13 or M1 bacteriophage. They are easy to grow on bacterial cultures (petri dishes or test tubes) and they are short and simple. M13 is kind of the lab rat of the viral world. We use it a lot for DNA sequences... kind a legacy from the early days. I think it might have been the first virus to be sequenced.
joemarklawson 3 years ago
wtf adds
akakilla1 4 years ago
What the hell did he just say? Sheesh..
teejers01 4 years ago
hes talking about the transformation of information into matter, like a wizard casting a spell (speaking information), to create an effect (matter is affected, produced, ect)
but thats probably too phylosophically for the ordinary youtube community to fully understand.
ergo: Future will be insane
MaZe741 4 years ago 7
philosophic
jasonguyperson 2 years ago
Comment removed
CosmoHunter24 4 years ago
Damn! Forget going into pharmaceuticals! When I finish my biotech degree THIS is what I'm gonna do...
Arxces 4 years ago 5
that was brilliant!!!
joebot1 4 years ago
The point of what this guy is doing is that for now, he can create microscopic shapes and patterns, but in the future he can create micro-microprocessors.
Imagine the computing power of a computer chip that can build itself and is 3 dimensional instead of the 2D layered chips we have now.
That is what he was talking about with the programing and compiling of protein molecules.
KurNorock 4 years ago
to fast, to short and he completly fails to explain what he wants...
Piers79 4 years ago
he says right at the end "What we really want to do in the end is learn how to program self assembly so that we can build anything."
A lot of TED talks refer to exactly the same thing. He is only talking fast because he obviously was on a very tight time constraint.
KurNorock 4 years ago 3
Well yes, perhaps I was being to fast and to short here... Anybody with a little knowledge about DNA selfassembly (so probably quite a good portion of the TED audience) understands the goal, but i think the intresting question is how ...
stillfilm 4 years ago
ups that was my flatmates account...
Piers79 4 years ago
Hmm. Not a very good talk. It's a very interesting idea, but he's talking far to quickly and too far above his audience's level of understanding.
Also, I think he took the title from the old programming tutorial "Casting SPELs in LISP."
frodocrockett 4 years ago
He is giving a talk at the TED conference. If that audience can't understand him then nobody can.
KurNorock 4 years ago
Well, when he asked for raised hands to see who understood, the response was not so good. =)
frodocrockett 4 years ago
I understood it fine and i'm not exactly a geneticist. I think you just didn't like him because he mentioned attacking hobbits.
aleceth 4 years ago
I'm a computer scientist with an interest in biology, so I had no problem with it. I like the idea, I just think it deserves a more detailed and better-paced exposition.
I'd also like to know what he thinks the eventual "kill application" for the technology will be. Maybe reduced costs for synthesizing substances?
frodocrockett 4 years ago
I don't get this at all - what does he mean by building 'technological artifacts' and 'biological artifacts'?
What is the point of having artifacts you can only see in the microscope?
nytonks 4 years ago
This is not an "exchange". Certainly not very scientific (are they handing out research papers with testable data?). I have to wonder who is the audience for this stuff? It may be good to show it to kids to develop an interest in Science/Technology which is sorely needed, but otherwise it seems like prostitution of Science to folks who cant possibly understand the subject on any useful level to exchange anything except for money.
polyex 4 years ago
the audience are business people looking to see what the nerds are studying and how they can make money of them by giving them funds($)oin their projects
stargazerfreak 4 years ago
if it took a year to make a star, then it's going to take a while to make a human, but ehy would you want to make a human? couldn't you use it to repair body parts?
muchachaverdeygris 4 years ago
Well yes, I believe that would be one of the goals, perhaps even organs that have your exact DNA and would never be rejekted by your body, but perhaps some micro machinery two like a kind of snow plow, that can clear blodvessels from blockages, or ... well really the amount of useful things we could make by fully understanding this is incomprehensibly large...
stillfilm 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Every inventor should ask themselves, "What could an absolute dictator with an army, a secret police, and entire economy at his disposal do with my invention?"
I'm just sayin...
spiritualmonkey 4 years ago
yeah, but then we would still be living naked in caves. Instead what everyone should be asking themselves is "How can I make a positive change to whats around me" and get off their lazy asses. Sticking your head in the sand isn't a plan for the future. dude.
CpILL 4 years ago 4
Robert Oppenheimer, "father of the atomic bomb", was not a lazy cave dweller.
And yet after seeing two Japanese cities worth of people burned to a crisp with the weapon he ushered in to existence, he quoted the Bhagavad Gita: "If the radiance of a thousand suns were to burst at once into the sky, that would be like the splendor of the mighty one. Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds."
So what can an absolute dictator with an army do with his invention?
spiritualmonkey 4 years ago
Yeah, what have they done? Nothing. But Robert should of seen it coming, after all it was a "bomb". Infact more people have died from light arms in the hands children than by bombs, period. Apparently box cutters were used to crash 2 plaines into the twin towers. Did you guy who made the box cutter stop to think about "evil" dictators.
CpILL 4 years ago
What stops dictators is not trying and halt all technological progress to remove all the potential weapons in the world, as this is (a) impossible (b) technology generally helps more than harms (see radiology as an example). What stops dictators is educated people. Education can has and will change the world for the better. Trying to remain ignorant has always lead to war (see Nazi Germany for examples).
CpILL 4 years ago
I wish we could do things like that in biology class... I would totally pay attention!
BeautifulBeau 4 years ago
Wow that is cool, that why i love biology!!!!
drahyden 4 years ago
the power to make anything from nothing would make new masters in the world. Only the filthy rich would have the machine to replicate. The whole world would go into chaos .. what would people do for work ? who would control the powerful ? George Orwell here we come
MasterMark123 4 years ago
Very short. I think he was very nervous and rushed through it. I get what he was talking about though. The ultimate in 3d printing and replication.
celshader 4 years ago
I love the theme! anyone have any idea what it is?
Lionsroar89 4 years ago
The intro was longer than the presentation.
alfwiz 4 years ago
too short!!!!
sacapiloa 4 years ago
jesus god that intro theme.
w0rldpeace 4 years ago
sweet i wanna make a ninja pirate!! lol
masxav16 4 years ago
er ... a caution ... what happens if the DNA sequence you make is also a dangerous virus?
JohnDeBunkTest 4 years ago
badass this has the potential to in the future build absolutely anything, wow the implications are profound.
SIP100 4 years ago
one more thing... i thing a good place to start with this is filters... just a thought.
reivilo 4 years ago
That's a great idea. What'd be even better would be being able to design a filter that makes use of the same kind of passive/active transport structures used by cells. Of course, some of them would need to be powered by ATP, which might be a bit of a drag.
frodocrockett 4 years ago
one step closer to a cleaner , susstainable world.... imagine cemement trucks full of this stuff!
reivilo 4 years ago