This guy makes it perfectly clear that even though something might seem amusing and contrary to common sense, it can still be right. Even though thats not the point he wants to prove.
If the Christian God is omnipotent and all powerful, why did it take him 6 days to create the Heavens and Earth, and even more odd, why did he need to REST on the seventh day? God needed to rest? Poor thing, I guess he isn't all that powerful after all if he needed to rest, now is he?
And what about the Ten Commandments. The first states that "Thou shalt have no other gods before me." So the Abrahamic god is admitting -- right there in the Decalogue -- that there are other gods besides him.
He lost me when he said "the controversy." What controversy? The asserted controversy that has 0 credible scientists calling for creation? THAT controversy?
Am I to understand that you believe that whomever put pen to paper and wrote the scriptures possess so much profound wisdom to understand all the science of the world?
Im confused how someone can state someone else is grossly ignorant on thermodynamics, and then attempt to assert with any credibility that entropy is in any way shape or form related to "disorder".
When Adam and Eve were in the "perfect" Garden of Eden I wonder if they had to "wipe" before being expelled.
Was Charmin growing freely on bushes at that time? If so what happened to the litter? Wiping on leaves would be uncomfortable. Not wiping at all get's well...itchy and dirty. Using the "one bad hand" method would be decidedly imperfect as well.
Or was humanity only cursed with the butt-hole when women were cursed with menstruation?
I watched this video again, and this guy is clearly the crocoduck winner. Why would show a t-rex and not a theropod dinosaur? Potholer never compared snowflakes to sunflowers, they were examples. Creationist dishonesty in true form!
whenever i see him laughing it becomes obvious that he doesn't understand what he is talking about because in the first few minutes he starts laughing at certain concept because he doesn't understand them
@USERNAMEfieldempty That is total bullshit and you know it! Evolution (according to you) does not work that way. You are saying that Eskimos basically stopped evolution because they wrapped up warm! Are you serious? Eskimos' are STILL going to die if they don't continue to use the techniques to live from the harsh enviroment They haven't and never will evolve into a new species! As much as you evolution idiots hope; it will NEVER happen.
@BloodOfRayne@Parabol0086 You're absolutely right. It's totally clear that you understand not only the simple high school basics about the processes of natural selection, but you also possess a deep and wide knowledge of the entire subject. So many creationists on Youtube don't have a clue what their talking about and make an abject fool of themselves every time they open their mouths. But not you, oh no, you're really really clever.
I'm studying Evolutionary Biology at University. But I stopped wasting my time explaining why evolution is the best explanation for the diversity of species because you people just don't understand. I don't recall even talking about evolution, I was just mocking a tiny portion of the retarded ideas of Christianity.
I can see why people might be deist, but Christianity is a book of absurdity. Greek Mythology is far more likely...
@Parabol0086@Parabol0086 woah... ok, I'm confused. I don't know how I did it, but I multi-mailed both BloodOfRayne (a cretard) and you with a single post. My apologies, I did not intend you to send you my message, it was intended for BloodOfRayne (still a cretard). Somehow I sent it to both of you? I have no idea how. Good luck with the bio studies.
@USERNAMEfieldempty Yes, I am a cretard, and you're an evotard. And yes, everything you're studying is a lie. That, unlike you're evolution bullshit, is a fact.
Mate, let's compare the words 'cretard' and 'evotard' as a metaphor for the strength of our scientific positions. 'Cretard' works as an insult, it's a portmanteau of 'retard' and 'Creationist' (obviously). Evolutionists invented it using raw intelligence. It's snappy and succinct.
Now you offer 'evotard'. Of course, imitation is the most sincere form of flattery; but your word is a poor, distorted copy of ours. It's derivative, dim and rather lame.
Looking through the comments it is incredibly obvious that all comments against the premise of the video have been removed. This perfectly exhibits typical creationist dishonesty. You should be ashamed of yourself.
(I'm under no illusion, by the way, that my comment will be allowed. I only hope that whoever reads to before deleting it will think about why, if their position is so correct, that they feel the need to suppress the free exchange of ideas)
@maax82 Anyone promulgating the pseudoscience of evil evolutionism is a liar. Nobody saw or sees lifeless and mindless chemical elements collaborating to contrive the alleged first simple self-replicating cell that is the supposed common ancestor of all and at the root of the bogus evolutionary tree of life. Human intelligence cannot make a living cell. Nobody saw or sees a simple cell transmute into all the life forms that ever lived. This evolutionary fairy tale is SCIENCE FICTION/LIES!
Cultures develop creation myths. They are etiological in nature in that they are an attempt to explain the seemingly unexplainable.
The tale of the "tower of babble" is another example of an etiological story. Ancient writers in the near east were unable to make sense of the existence of other languages so they created a story to account for it.
I hope the creator of this vid doesn't actually believe in the garden with the talking snake as a viable alternative to evolutionary biology.
This video is complete B.S. 2:30 is referring to sexual selection. 4:50. The second law of thermodynamics is an expression of what happens in a isolated (aka. closed) system. 8:15 Birds are derived from Theropod DINOSAURS. 8:50 Evolution=/=Abiogenesis. Abiogenesis is the study of how life began from non-life. Evolution explains the diversity of life after it had began.
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN put up or shut up??? Youre making assertions, thats it. No genetics textbook states that DNA is code from a creator. Look up flagellum, it use to be a creationists bff but studies show it only needs 10 out of its 50 parts to function. Thats called evolution my retarded friend
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN um you need to stop getting your science info from answers in genesis!!Nothing in this post is accurate, you just cant assert shit w/o demonstrating how its possible. I say its magic shit leprechauns :)-
@atheistcommonsense YOU ARE IRRATIONAL. NOBODY HAS SCIENCE/KNOWLEDGE ABOUT POND SCUM TO HUMAN EVOLUTION OR ANY OF THE OTHER ORIGINS FABLES/SCIENCE FICTION.
AIG HAS PEER REVIEWED PAPERS/JOURNALS/ARTICLES WHICH YOU MAKE A BIG DEAL ABOUT. UNLIKE THE FARCICAL UNSCIENTIFIC PEER REVIEWED PAPERS ABOUT IMAGINARY POND SCUM TO HUMAN EVOLUTION, AIG HAS REAL SCIENTISTS USING THE EMPIRICAL SCIENTIFIC METHOD.
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN YEAH ACS, HE HAS ARTICLES. I READ THEM. AND PEER REVIEWED THEM. WHAT DO I DO? IM A PREACHER. OF COURSE I CAN'T TELL YOU THE NAMES OF THE PAPERS. I JUST USE CAPS TO ASSERT I AM RIGHT. I BUILD STRAWMEN LIKE "POND SCUM TO HUMAN" AND THAT MAKES MY "MAGIC GOD INSTA_HUMAN" CONCEPT SEEM SMARTER. IM GONNA SAY YOU THINK EVERYTHING CAME FROM NOTHING (BIGBANG LOL) WHEN ITS ACTUALLY MY MAGIC GOD THEORY THAT IS THE ONLY ONE CLAIMING SOMETHING FROM NOTHING.
@jtheist32 THE QUINTESSENTIAL MORON WHO ASSERTS WITHOUT SUBSTANTIATION AND IS CLUELESS OF THE STRAW MAN FALLACY HE USES HIMSELF. Hebrews 11:3 By faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that the things which are seen were not made of things which are visible.
THEREFORE, THE VISIBLE MATERIALS WERE MADE FROM INVISIBLE THINGS BY GOD. FROM NOW ON NEVER USE THIS STRAW MAN ARGUMENT AGAIN "MAGIC GOD THEORY THAT IS THE ONLY ONE CLAIMING SOMETHING FROM NOTHING". STOP LYING
@fourbabies1 Typical anti-intellectual ridicule rant from irrational evotards that worship the creation i.e. MATERIALISM (what is nonliving & mindless) instead of the living real and superior intelligent being called the God of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Jesus and all Real Christians.
@fourbabies1 Being a free rational thinker one can arrive at the following factual conclusions: Evolutionism is atheistic science fiction and the religion of the atheistic sort becuase the alleged fairytale events from pond scum all the way to humans was not and is not directly observed, testable or repeating or reproducible as the scientific method requires. A Materialistic origin is impossible since DNA code and specified instructions cannot come from mindless and lifeless chemical elements.
lol, you are a dickhead. stop reading from the likes of willy lane craig and ray bananaman comfort and start reading from people who actually study biology. till then, fuck off you superstitious idiot.
@fourbabies1 Biology has nothing to do with the science fiction, fairy tale storytelling of pond scum to you evolution.
Do you not know that these so-called sciences and scientists are oxymoronic: evolutionary scientist, evolutionary biologist, evolutionary psychologist, evolutionary paleoanthropologist etc because they are hijacking evidence for imaginary presumed events that defy real science? THESE PEOPLE ARE DELUSION AND DO NOT KNOW REALITY FROM FICTION/FABLES/MYTHS.
YOU HAVE NO FACTS ABOUT POND SCUM TO HUMAN EVOLUTION BECAUSE IT NEVER HAPPENED OR HAPPENS AND CANNOT HAPPEN IN DEFIANCE OF THE APPLICABLE LAWS OF SCIENCE. POND SCUM TO HUMAN EVOLUTION IS ONLY IMAGINED/PRESUMED. THESE FAIRY TALE JUST-SO-STORIES HAS BECOME THE RELIGION OF THE REPROBATE ATHESTIC SORT.
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN Please tell me where you get your FACTS from when you preach Creationsim, I could make a Guess BUT i WOULD LIKE TO HEAR IT FROM YOU .
@MrJackomick IT IS COMMON SENSE, TAUTOLOGICAL, THAT NOBODY SAW OR SEES POND SCUM TO HUMAN EVOLUTION, THAT IT DEFIES SCIENTIFIC LAWS, THAT POND SCUM TO HUMAN EVOLUTION IS ONLY JUST-SO-STORIES I.E. A FABLE/MYTH/SCIENCE FICTION, THAT EVOLUTION DOES NOT MAKE FOSSILS, NOR DOES UNIFORMITARIAN GEOLOGY, SO SEDIMENTARY LAYERS AND FOSSILS ARE HIJACKED BY EVIL EVOLUTIONISTS WITH FALSE CLAIMS FOR THEIR SCIENCE FICTION.
ANYONE USING COMMON SENSE WITH BASIC KNOWLEDGE WILL ARRIVE AT THIS SAME CONCLUSION.
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN You still have not answed my question, is it to much for you , is it to basic a question , or is it because you only have one frame of reference , a dusty old codex.
@MrJackomick FACTS that are being verified by Real Science is what God has claimed in the Bible i.e. Archaeologist continually find artifacts confirming the places, peoples and events the Bible documented by eyewitnesses, and operational sciences are catching up with what has claimed about His creation. For example God spoke things into existence, the DNA Code and Specified instructions/commands are the language/design from the mind of God which cannot come from a material medium to falsify EVO.
You again... Get a life, retard. To destroy Christianity and all God arguments are easy, if the person isn't retarded. I won't waste more of my time on you.
@Parabol0086 YOU DID NOT PUT UP TO DEFEND YOUR HEARSAY COMMENT OF "To destroy Christianity and all God arguments are easy,..." THEREFORE SHUT UP MORON.
GOD EXISTS BECAUSE MINDLESS AND LIFELESS CHEMICAL ELEMENTS CANNOT CONTRIVE LANGUAGE, A CODE, OR THE BILLIONS OF SPECIFIED CODE FOR BIOLOGICAL MACHINES TO TRANSLATE AND TO ACT UPON TO MAKE YOUR PAIR OF EYES, EARS, LIMBS, ORGANS ETC. HUMAN INTELLIGENCE CANNOT DO IT SO A SUPERIOR INTELLIGENCE/BEING DID AS HE CLAIMS IN THE BIBLE.
lulz, you fucking idiot. Go believe cain and abel fucked their mother to create the human race. And then noah's kids did the same thing to repopulate the Earth. Even though that sort of inbreeding would be disastrous after just a few generations if not from the start.
Don't worry god sent himself as a man but a god to kill himself to knowingly rise 3 days later to forgive our supposed sins that he could just forgive but loves violence... Some sacrifice.
@Parabol0086 WOW YOU ARE EXTREMELY IGNORANT, MENTALLY ILL OR YOU ARE A WILFULL REPROBATE.
None of the children had sexual relations/children with their parents; the text does not support your lies evil atheist. Siblings intially married each other until the population grew for other options i.e. cousins and more distant family. Biologically this is not an issue from Adam & Eve or Noah's children with their diverse gene pool. Jesus is not the Father/God in the flesh to raise Himself.
@Parabol0086 God prohibited inbreeding by the Israelites to keep the nation fit and healthy in the book of Leviticus which Darwin should have known in his seminary studies which his dad encourage since he was a scholastic failure in medicine and mathematics. This may explain why Charles Darwin like you cannot read for comprehension. Darwin erroneously promoted inbreeding for humans to better evolve, but God prohibited inbreeding because He knew the gene pool was weakened by inbreeding pressure.
@Parabol0086 Jesus was sent by God into the world made of the virgin woman to be the Messiah/Christ. Jesus is not the Father/God. The Father is the God of Jesus and of all real Christians. Jesus was innocent before God [sinless though tested], as he was found innocent of all charges from the Jewish Leaders of the people by the Roman Government. Having lived a sinless life, he did offer himself on behave of humanity as the Lamb of God to satisfy the sin committed by humanity to be an reparation.
I searched who did cain marry, had a read through the first link, thought about you and laughed that people actually believe this shit.
So you think that inbreeding, which you say god was against, between bros and sis, and then cousins and cousins, is different or better than Darwin's family tree? Hmm. You're an idiot.
With that amount of inbreeding (as with "the south") should not have surprised god that they would be mischievous; they would all be mentally disabled..
@Parabol0086 THE BIBLE IS EYEWITNESS HISTORICAL NARRATIVE; IT'S A FACT JACK.
ANYONE THAT BELIEVES IN MATERIALISM IS DELUSIONAL AND ANTI-INTELLECTUAL SINCE IT’S WITHOUT LOGIC, EVIDENCE AND CANNOT USE THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD.
IDIOTS USE THE STRAW MAN ARGUMENT.
WHEN ADAM AND EVE WERE FIRST MADE THEIR GENETIC POOL WAS RICH AND UNTAINTED. THE MARRIAGE OF SIBLINGS AND COUSINS ETC. WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN AN ISSUE. A GENETIC BOTTLENECK SCIENTIFICALLY CONFIRM BY MtDNA SUPPORTS THE GLOBAL FLOOD.
@Parabol0086 THE GLOBAL FLOOD CAUSED A BOTTLENECK OF THE GENETIC POOL SINCE 3 FERTILE WOMEN SURVIVED TO REPOPULATE THE WORLD WHICH AT AN ANNUAL GROWTH RATE OF 0.46% IN 4300 YEARS YIELDS 7 BILLION PEOPLE TODAY [ON AN EVO-TIMELINE, THE GROWTH RATE IS RIDICULOUSLY LOW AND THE BONES ARE MISSING FROM THE TRILLIONS OF PEOPLE IF AT 0.46%]. BY THE TIME THE POPULATION GREW AND MOSES IS ON THE SEEN, INTERBREEDING IS PROHIBITED FOR THE ISRAELITES. THIS WAS ADOPTED BY CHRISTIANS, BUT NOT DARWIN'S EVOLUTION?
@Parabol0086 DARWIN WAS AN INBREEDING PROMOTER TO THE DETRIMENT OF HIS CHILDREN. HE WAS ALSO A PRODUCT OF INBREEDING AS MANY ROYALS WERE AS WELL. AS A RESULT THEY WERE LESS FIT/HEALTHY.
WHAT INBREEDING OF THE SOUTH ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT AND WHAT DOES IT HAVE TO DO WITH GOD PROHIBITING IT AND DARWIN PROMOTING IT?
ARE YOU INBREED AS EVIDENCE FROM YOUR BELIEVE IN NONSENSICAL AND UNSCIENTIFIC MATERIALISM, AND EVIL EVOLUTIONISM?
WHO IS THE IDIOT??? STOP LYING ATHEIST. IS THIS MORALITY OKAY?
@atheistcommonsense The bible says God spoke all things into existence. THE DNA CODE AND SEMANTIC INSTRUCTIONS IN THE DNA OF ALL LIFE IS THE LANGUAGE AND DESIGN OF GOD! At the sub-atomic level it is suspected the coded information must exist somehow to make all chemical elements behave predictably as commanded/instructed by God.
STOP WORSHIPING THINGS CREATED I.E. MATERIALISM AND ONLY WORSHIP AND SERVE THE CREATOR AMEN!
Closed systems in terms of thermodynamics do exist. You meant to say ISOLATED systems do not exist. The latter statement is correct, your statement, however, is not correct
This Dunning-Kruger victim probably believes that Moses was a real person who wrote the entire Pentateuch and that there aren't actually two creation myths in the "book" of Genesis.
Love to see him apply his highly sophisticated intellect to the construction of a 100 pound female human from a 9 ounce segment of bone.
@HellRehab How can you deny Moses as a real person thousands of years removed from his generation? Do you time travel or believe your personal hearsay opinion has any weight? Moses indeed wrote portions of Genesis and compiled the rest of the book of Genesis and the Pentateuch. YOU ARE MORON THAT CANNOT READ TO STATE THERE ARE TWO CREATION ACCOUNTS!
YOU ARE ALSO IGNORANT OF THE FACT THAT THE SPERM & EGG ARE SO SMALL AND FORM A BABY BY GODS INSTRUCTIONS IN DNA! WHAT IS THE WEIGHT RATIO MORON?
@atheistcommonsense the atheist without common sense or logic.I gave you the eyewitness evidence that is biblically documented by God and Adam by which creationist trust/know that God created all things. I gave the common sense evidence that only intelligent beings can contrive and that nonliving chemical elements that are devoid of intelligence cannot contrive biological life or transmute life from one form into a different kind of life form. This is scientific,evolutionism is science fiction!
@atheistcommonsense THE CREATIONIST DOES NOT DENY GOD AS IF HE WERE ALL KNOWING, BUT THE FALLACIOUS ATHEIST DOES WITHOUT SUBSTANTIATION. THE CREATIONIST DOES NOT CLAIM TO HAVE ALL KNOWLEDGE, HE BELIEVES THE BIBLICAL CLAIM I.E. GOD'S CLAIMS BY FAITH AND DOES NOT CLAIM THAT THEIR BELIEF IS THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD. THE CREATIONIST RATIONALLY CONCLUDES THAT A SUPERIOR INTELLIGENCE CAN MAKE A FLEA AND A PEA BECAUSE THE ATHEIST, EVOLUTIONIST, NONLIVING CHEMICAL ELEMENTS, AND INSECTS CANNOT. YOU FAILED
The fake laughter is more than I can endure. I checked out yer channel to see if this was parody. Ha ha ha, yuck yuck. You can't make this stuff huh-hup.
Ratings disabled. So...THUMBS DOWN THUMBS DOWN THUMBS DOWN THUMBS DOWN THUMBS DOWN THUMBS DOWN ETC.
@USERNAMEfieldempty SORRY TO BURST YOUR BUBBLE. THESE ARE NOT SCIENTISTS: EVOLUTIONARY-BIOLOGIST/ANTHROPOLOGIST/PSYCHOLOGIST/CHEMICST/COSMOLOGIST ETC. BECAUSE THE MYTHICAL BIG BANG FROM NOTHING INTO ALL THAT EXISTS IS ONLY IMAGINED/PRESUMED AS IS CHEMICAL EVOLUTION, BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION ETC. NONE OF THESE CAN USE THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD OF DIRECT OBSERVATION AND REPEATED TESTING OF A TESTABLE REPEATING PHENOMENON. ALL OF THE SO-CALLED SCIENTISTS ARE IRRESPONSIBLE AND FRAUDS SPREADING A HOAX.
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN Either... biological science, the genetics industry, the petro-chemical industry, every university, all governments, healthcare, education etc are in a huge mysterious plot which hides the truth from everyone except YOU, a supra-genius, who can see through the lies which have fooled the rest of us.
@TheJo4an SORRY TO BURST YOUR BUBBLE. THESE ARE NOT SCIENTISTS: EVOLUTIONARY-BIOLOGIST/ANTHROPOLOGIST/PSYCHOLOGIST/CHEMICST/COSMOLOGIST ETC. BECAUSE THE MYTHICAL BIG BANG FROM NOTHING INTO ALL THAT EXISTS IS ONLY IMAGINED/PRESUMED AS IS CHEMICAL EVOLUTION, BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION ETC. NONE OF THESE CAN USE THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD OF DIRECT OBSERVATION AND REPEATED TESTING OF A TESTABLE REPEATING PHENOMENON. ALL OF THE SO-CALLED SCIENTISTS ARE IRRESPONSIBLE AND FRAUDS SPREADING A HOAX.
@Helixbuilder Anyone promulgating the pseudoscience of evil evolutionism is a liar. Nobody saw or sees lifeless and mindless chemical elements collaborating to contrive the alleged first simple self-replicating cell that is the supposed common ancestor of all and at the root of the bogus evolutionary tree of life. Human intelligence cannot make a living cell. Nobody saw or sees a simple cell transmute into all the life forms that ever lived. This evolutionary fairy tale is SCIENCE FICTION/LIES!
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN Show me the experiments that prove that this is not possible. Otherwise you are spouting an opinion. Secondly show where in the theory of abiogensis or evolution it states that "a simple cell transmute into all the life forms that ever lived ".
What is the alleged evolutionary tree of life and what is at its root which is the common ancestor of all? Watch youtube . com/user/HISTRUTHBEKNOWN?feature=mhee#p/a/u/1/Pi1Foiz6kqE
Do you know the work of Louis Pasteur and the Law of Biogenesis?
Do you know that humans cannot make a living cell using the elements of the periodic table despite the many attempts worldwide?
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN What point in abiogenesis don't you understand? Read some science literature rather than apologist's writings.Evolution deal with how life changes over time and abiogenesis is the theory of how life started.
@Helixbuilder Are you stupid? Abiogenesis is impossible without the superior intelligence of GOD. Humans, insects, animals, and of course mindless and lifeless chemical elements cannot contrive life.
STOP LYING EVIL ATHEIST. DARWIN YOUR BELOVED BONEHEADED BRIT SAID LIFE STARTED IN WARM POOLS OF WATER WITH CHEMICAL IN THEM. WITHOUT ABIOGENESIS, SPONTANEOUS GENERATION OF LIFE, DARWIN KNEW THERE WAS NO ORIGIN OF LIFE AND THE CONTINUUM OF CHANGE BY GRADUALISM WOULD NOT BE POSSIBLE. DUH
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN "Abiogenesis is impossible without the superior intelligence of GOD."
thats actually 100% false as it has been tested and proven that abiogenesis is very possible without god. in fact, abiogenesis absolutely did happen without the help of god.
@MrAnthonyfilms LYING IS SO NATURAL FOR YOU IT FLOWS FROM YOU WITHOUT ANY OFFENSE TO YOUR CONSCIOUS OR SENSE OF INTELLECTUAL INTEGRITY AND DESIRE FOR REAL SCIENCE.
READ THE FOLLOWING TO EDUCATE YOURSELF ON WHY ABIOGENESIS IS IMPOSSIBLE
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN true origin is a fraudulent website filled with strait bullshit, half truths and dogma. theres absolutely nothing factual about that website.
Every sane Biologists knows evolutionism is science fiction and they know they cannot make a flea or a pea from chemical elements and that they cannot improve on God's design.
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN ..... bananas? dogs? nearly everything you eat? we have genetically modified and IMPROVED biological organisms. thats a fact. and every sane biologist knows evolution is science fiction? 97% of biologists accept evolution, it's a fact. the other 3 percent are idiots like you.
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN lol did you really link someone to answersingensis? That's hilarious!!!! Would you mind next time sending people to a REAL science journal, you know, something peer-reviewed.
@atheistcommonsense AIG HAS SCIENTISTS ON STAFF AND ASSOCIATES THAT CAN DO THE PEER REVIEW WORK.
EVIL EVOLUTIONIST HAVE OXYMORONIC PROFESSIONS CONDUCTING ABSURD PEER REVIEW OF IMAGINED/PRESUMED EVOLUTION FROM NOTHING TO EVERYTHING IN THE UNIVERSE AND BIOLOGICAL LIFE ON PLANET EARTH THAT ALL HAPPENED BY MINDLESS AND LIFELESS CHEMICAL ELEMENTS.
WHY NOT LET THE PEER REVIEW PROCESS ALSO HAPPEN BY MINDLESS AND LIFELESS CHEMICAL ELEMENTS I.E. NO UNINTELLIGENT EVIL EVOLUTIONISTS ALLOWED?
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN Scientifically you can not make this statement "Abiogenesis is impossible without the superior intelligence of GOD" Where is your evidence to show that you are right?
@Helixbuilder According to Sir Fred Hoyle, the odds of a cell forming naturalistically is 10^-40,000 which is zero. This is why Abiogenesis formerly called Spontaneous Generation is NEVER SEEN. THE NAME CHANGE FROM SPONTANEOUS GENERATION TO ABIOGENESIS OCCURRED BECAUSE IT WAS NEVER SEEN WHEN SPONTANEOUS GENERATION IMPLIES AN EVENT THAT WOULD BE VISIBLE.
ONLY A MIND MORE SUPERIOR THAN ALL THE MINDS OF HUMANS COMBINED COULD HAVE CONTRIVE A CHEMICAL CODE AND INSTRUCTIONS TO MAKE BIOLOGICAL LIFE.
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN So how did Hoyle come up with that figure? He was an astrophysicists. So using him for a source for biological information is like going to an auto mechanic for a heart surgery consult.
@Helixbuilder Do the research yourself. It is not essential to be a biologist to figure out the odds of a cell randomly forming by naturalistic means. If you have an understanding of probabilities you can easily show that the odds are so ridiculous i.e. zero.
“No matter how large the environment one considers, life cannot have had a random beginning [...] . There are about two thousand enzymes, and the chance of obtaining them all"
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN OK I find it odd that Bergman doesn''t quote anything from Jack W. Szostak work.Why not comment on the most up to date research? The starting point for Bergman is a full blown bacteria, where Szostak starts with a protocell. Bergman's argument is a strawman. He misrepresents the work of others then hopes you don't look up any of the references.
@Helixbuilder Szostak does not start with chemical elements and it is not life moron.
"Of course, building an even very primitive functioning “cell” (if it can be done) is no easy task. Madrigal explains that the “life” Szostak is working on is nowhere near as complex as existing life: “Modern life is far more complex than the simple systems that Szostak and others are working on,” she writes, adding that Szostak’s “protocells don't look anything like the cells that we have in our bodies.”
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN Read the paper! 'The Origins of Cellular Life' Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a002212 published online May 19, 2010 by Jason P. Schrum, Ting F. Zhu and Jack W. Szostak
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN Hmm Thermo = heat dynamics = motion, The second law of thermodynamics is an expression of the tendency that over time, differences in temperature, pressure, and chemical potential equilibrate in an isolated physical system. OK Now what is your point? Where does complexity enter the definition?
The second law of thermodynamics universally confirms a progression from order to disorder, from complexity to simplicity, in the physical universe that falsifies evolution which magically expects, rather needs the reverse.
@Helixbuilder DID YOU ANSWER MY QUESTIONS? IT APPEARS YOU ARE COMPLETELY CLUELESS OF WHAT 1ST, 2ND LAWS ARE AND WHAT ENTROPY IS AND WHY EACH STATE IS LESS COMPLEX THAT THE PRIOR STATE AS ALL THINGS WIND DOWN AFTER BEING WOUND UP BY INTELLIGENT BEINGS.
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN Why are you so rude? I defined the 2nd Law earlier so for you to say the above is asinine! Thermodynamics is heat transfer and has nothing to do with complexity.
@Helixbuilder WHY ARE YOU NOT ANSWERING MY QUESTIONS? THAT IS RUDE TO AVOID MY QUESTION. YOU DO NOT KNOW WHAT ENTROPY AND DISORDER ARE. ANSWER MY QUESTIONS AND GET OFF YOUR SOAP BOX.
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN Just look at the web page! I have many thermodynamics textbooks..They typically follow a pattern in presenting the information. A concept is introduced than there are exercises review and then repeat.. The web page does not it the pattern. It presents definitions not supported by the mathematical formula and editorials about evolution.
@Helixbuilder There is no joking on my part. What facts are screwed up? You waste comment space and time when you are not clear or substantiate yourself.
The second law and the first law of thermodynamics falsify the general theory of EVIL EVOLUTIONISM!
You have no understanding of the concept of entropy, disorder, complexity, and that the second law applies to chemistry, biology, mechanical/thermo systems whether open closed or isolated.
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN How? Do you want me to derive the second law? You don't understand it period. If you did you could correctly answer the following;Which state of water has greater entropy and complexity; ice or boiling water?
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN Boiling water has a greater complexity than ice! Don't believe me predict where a water molecule will be in ice or boiling water. So entropy CAN increase and so can entropy! Welcome to the real world!
@Helixbuilder "So entropy CAN increase and so can entropy! Welcome to the real world! " <<<<< CORRECTION REQUIRED
It is tautological in the second law of thermodynamics that entropy can increase and decrease, that order can increase or decrease, the complexity can decrease to become simpler.
1st Law; energy or matter can neither be created nor destroyed. 2nd Law:heat flows spontaneously form a hot body to cold; the energy that cannot be converted to work is entropy.
@HeYlixbuilder Yes the first is correct, also known as the conservation of energy. Therefore, evolutionism's big bang is falsified since nothing cannot create matter/energy, only God could.
The second law is more univesal than just dealing with the flow of heat energy. Heat flow is the simple example used for teaching its basics.
How are chemical compounds, biological compounds/tissues/organisms etc affected by the second law? What work/energy is required to maintain systems temporarily?
Oliver Hardy has really failed to find a sensible career since Stan died. :-(
USERNAMEfieldempty 5 hours ago in playlist Golden Crocoduck nominees 2012
*facepalm* I'm embarrassed this guy is Canadian. FYI 50% of BC population is agnostic or better!!! Common over atheists!
Davet1187 1 day ago in playlist Golden Crocoduck nominees 2012
"Don't forget to rate" you say and yet rating is disabled. I wonder why :)
anonC2H5OH 1 day ago in playlist Golden Crocoduck nominees 2012
so many capitals!!!! my eyes!!!!!!!!!!!
Davet1187 1 day ago in playlist Golden Crocoduck nominees 2012
That's so cool! Ian makes everything interesting.
CalebHab 3 days ago
this is so fucking hilarious
taylorbortnerathing 4 days ago in playlist Golden Crocoduck nominees 2012
This guy makes it perfectly clear that even though something might seem amusing and contrary to common sense, it can still be right. Even though thats not the point he wants to prove.
Findulidas 4 days ago
idiot jesusist
mikesomething 5 days ago in playlist Golden Crocoduck nominees 2012
ratings disabled, wooda thunk it?
aardjazz 5 days ago in playlist Golden Crocoduck nominees 2012
This is dumbfuck week, season 1, episode 1.
sethyboy0 6 days ago in playlist Golden Crocoduck nominees 2012
If the Christian God is omnipotent and all powerful, why did it take him 6 days to create the Heavens and Earth, and even more odd, why did he need to REST on the seventh day? God needed to rest? Poor thing, I guess he isn't all that powerful after all if he needed to rest, now is he?
And what about the Ten Commandments. The first states that "Thou shalt have no other gods before me." So the Abrahamic god is admitting -- right there in the Decalogue -- that there are other gods besides him.
comingatchu 6 days ago in playlist Golden Crocoduck nominees 2012
I'm voting for you in the 2012 Golden Crocoduck awards.
brothersoulshine 1 week ago
God created the sun on day 4.
Wallabynge 1 week ago
@Wallabynge Therefore on days 1-3 the earth was frozen. Without the energy from the sun what provided the heat to melt the water?
Helixbuilder 1 week ago
@Helixbuilder Oh, I'm sorry. I didn't know that the earth was frozen on days 1-3. Can you show me that information please?
Khrystoffar 6 days ago
what a dick
mjn132 1 week ago in playlist Golden Crocoduck nominees 2012
@mjn132 You are an anti-intellectual FOOL!
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 1 week ago
this is interesting just to get an idea how someone who has no real understanding of what he's talking about thinks and processes information.
Berelore 1 week ago in playlist Golden Crocoduck nominees 2012
@Berelore Fallacious tactic; unsubstantiate bare assertion in a ridicule format. Conclusion: You are an anti-intellectual.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 1 week ago
o look more disabled ratings
compendiumgravemind 1 week ago in playlist Golden Crocoduck nominees 2012 2
He lost me when he said "the controversy." What controversy? The asserted controversy that has 0 credible scientists calling for creation? THAT controversy?
jtheist32 1 week ago
look at this guy. dunno about anyone else but watching this made me think "this dude must be a total pussy magnet"
1984LizardKing 1 week ago in playlist Golden Crocoduck nominees 2012
Am I to understand that you believe that whomever put pen to paper and wrote the scriptures possess so much profound wisdom to understand all the science of the world?
cloudstone123 1 week ago
the Stupid is strong with this one
twentyinchsoul 1 week ago in playlist Golden Crocoduck nominees 2012
Ian has obviously never read the 2nd law.
The 2nd law... "that over time, differences in temperature, pressure, and chemical potential equilibrate in an isolated physical system"
Key word; Isolated
Anzacpaul 1 week ago in playlist Golden Crocoduck nominees 2012
Comment removed
Anzacpaul 1 week ago
The ignorance in the video, poor humanity... poor humanity...
MagnusNyborg 2 weeks ago in playlist Golden Crocoduck nominees 2012
I just wasted 12 minutes of my life on tis crap, and I want it back.
Zereniti77 2 weeks ago in playlist Golden Crocoduck nominees 2012
"the lack of fur on humans" and one hell of a hairy dude in background)))) the irony, the irony))
fe328 2 weeks ago in playlist Uploaded videos
Who is this fat gobshite?
Primordialfan1 2 weeks ago in playlist Golden Crocoduck nominees 2012
Im confused how someone can state someone else is grossly ignorant on thermodynamics, and then attempt to assert with any credibility that entropy is in any way shape or form related to "disorder".
SidewaysGts 2 weeks ago in playlist Golden Crocoduck nominees 2012
nice beergut dude. you surely get my vote for the crocoduck award
zaxxxon 2 weeks ago in playlist Golden Crocoduck nominees 2012
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN which article?
atheistcommonsense 2 weeks ago
When Adam and Eve were in the "perfect" Garden of Eden I wonder if they had to "wipe" before being expelled.
Was Charmin growing freely on bushes at that time? If so what happened to the litter? Wiping on leaves would be uncomfortable. Not wiping at all get's well...itchy and dirty. Using the "one bad hand" method would be decidedly imperfect as well.
Or was humanity only cursed with the butt-hole when women were cursed with menstruation?
Sincere question.
HellRehab 2 weeks ago
Please be a Poe! Please be a Poe! I refuse someone can be so stupid by accident.
piperun 2 weeks ago
Yeap, we're the same species, no I'm not particularly gay about it.
FoxvoxDK 2 weeks ago in playlist Golden Crocoduck nominees 2012
A pigeon playing chess on camera, wow
Weapuhx 2 weeks ago in playlist Golden Crocoduck nominees 2012
Hhhhhhhhhh You killed me with the dinosaur part xD
Well if anyone really wants to see why dinosaurs aren't birds i suggest this vid: /watch?v=Y5uEyChhiFk
YamiYami17 2 weeks ago
@dproctor18 b/c he knows
atheistcommonsense 2 weeks ago
you tell us to rate your video, yet disabled ratings.....
dproctor18 2 weeks ago in playlist Golden Crocoduck nominees 2012 7
I watched this video again, and this guy is clearly the crocoduck winner. Why would show a t-rex and not a theropod dinosaur? Potholer never compared snowflakes to sunflowers, they were examples. Creationist dishonesty in true form!
atheistcommonsense 2 weeks ago
whenever i see him laughing it becomes obvious that he doesn't understand what he is talking about because in the first few minutes he starts laughing at certain concept because he doesn't understand them
JerkingForJesus 2 weeks ago in playlist Golden Crocoduck nominees 2012
potholer talked about closed systems becouse we are living in one mannnnn this guy he dims the hopes of all humans.
takebackkean 2 weeks ago in playlist Golden Crocoduck nominees 2012
@USERNAMEfieldempty That is total bullshit and you know it! Evolution (according to you) does not work that way. You are saying that Eskimos basically stopped evolution because they wrapped up warm! Are you serious? Eskimos' are STILL going to die if they don't continue to use the techniques to live from the harsh enviroment They haven't and never will evolve into a new species! As much as you evolution idiots hope; it will NEVER happen.
BloodOfRayne 2 weeks ago
@BloodOfRayne @Parabol0086 You're absolutely right. It's totally clear that you understand not only the simple high school basics about the processes of natural selection, but you also possess a deep and wide knowledge of the entire subject. So many creationists on Youtube don't have a clue what their talking about and make an abject fool of themselves every time they open their mouths. But not you, oh no, you're really really clever.
USERNAMEfieldempty 2 weeks ago
@USERNAMEfieldempty
I'm studying Evolutionary Biology at University. But I stopped wasting my time explaining why evolution is the best explanation for the diversity of species because you people just don't understand. I don't recall even talking about evolution, I was just mocking a tiny portion of the retarded ideas of Christianity.
I can see why people might be deist, but Christianity is a book of absurdity. Greek Mythology is far more likely...
Parabol0086 2 weeks ago
@Parabol0086 @Parabol0086 woah... ok, I'm confused. I don't know how I did it, but I multi-mailed both BloodOfRayne (a cretard) and you with a single post. My apologies, I did not intend you to send you my message, it was intended for BloodOfRayne (still a cretard). Somehow I sent it to both of you? I have no idea how. Good luck with the bio studies.
USERNAMEfieldempty 2 weeks ago
@USERNAMEfieldempty
No worries. And thanks but I'm going to need a bit more than luck haha.
You do kinda take it personal when you study your ass off and then hear people say you are studying a lie.
Parabol0086 2 weeks ago
@USERNAMEfieldempty Yes, I am a cretard, and you're an evotard. And yes, everything you're studying is a lie. That, unlike you're evolution bullshit, is a fact.
BloodOfRayne 4 days ago
@BloodOfRayne
Mate, let's compare the words 'cretard' and 'evotard' as a metaphor for the strength of our scientific positions. 'Cretard' works as an insult, it's a portmanteau of 'retard' and 'Creationist' (obviously). Evolutionists invented it using raw intelligence. It's snappy and succinct.
Now you offer 'evotard'. Of course, imitation is the most sincere form of flattery; but your word is a poor, distorted copy of ours. It's derivative, dim and rather lame.
Do you see my metaphor, BoR?
USERNAMEfieldempty 3 days ago
Looking through the comments it is incredibly obvious that all comments against the premise of the video have been removed. This perfectly exhibits typical creationist dishonesty. You should be ashamed of yourself.
(I'm under no illusion, by the way, that my comment will be allowed. I only hope that whoever reads to before deleting it will think about why, if their position is so correct, that they feel the need to suppress the free exchange of ideas)
mcmonkey001 2 weeks ago in playlist Golden Crocoduck nominees 2012 9
This has been flagged as spam show
@maax82 Anyone promulgating the pseudoscience of evil evolutionism is a liar. Nobody saw or sees lifeless and mindless chemical elements collaborating to contrive the alleged first simple self-replicating cell that is the supposed common ancestor of all and at the root of the bogus evolutionary tree of life. Human intelligence cannot make a living cell. Nobody saw or sees a simple cell transmute into all the life forms that ever lived. This evolutionary fairy tale is SCIENCE FICTION/LIES!
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 weeks ago
@USERNAMEfieldempty Anti-intellectual Non-Sequitur FALLACY
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
USERNAMEfieldempty 2 weeks ago
golden crocoduck winner right here. what a whackjob.
ByTheBeardOfZeus1000 2 weeks ago in playlist Golden Crocoduck nominees 2012
Cultures develop creation myths. They are etiological in nature in that they are an attempt to explain the seemingly unexplainable.
The tale of the "tower of babble" is another example of an etiological story. Ancient writers in the near east were unable to make sense of the existence of other languages so they created a story to account for it.
I hope the creator of this vid doesn't actually believe in the garden with the talking snake as a viable alternative to evolutionary biology.
HellRehab 2 weeks ago
This video is complete B.S. 2:30 is referring to sexual selection. 4:50. The second law of thermodynamics is an expression of what happens in a isolated (aka. closed) system. 8:15 Birds are derived from Theropod DINOSAURS. 8:50 Evolution=/=Abiogenesis. Abiogenesis is the study of how life began from non-life. Evolution explains the diversity of life after it had began.
ghost124578 2 weeks ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN put up or shut up??? Youre making assertions, thats it. No genetics textbook states that DNA is code from a creator. Look up flagellum, it use to be a creationists bff but studies show it only needs 10 out of its 50 parts to function. Thats called evolution my retarded friend
atheistcommonsense 2 weeks ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN um you need to stop getting your science info from answers in genesis!!Nothing in this post is accurate, you just cant assert shit w/o demonstrating how its possible. I say its magic shit leprechauns :)-
atheistcommonsense 2 weeks ago
@atheistcommonsense PUT UP OR SHUT UP! WHAT IN MY POST IS NOT ACCURATE? REAL
SCIENCE FROM ANY SOURCE IS SCIENCE/KNOWLEDGE THAT IS THRUTHFUL!
STOP LYING EVIL ATHEIST AND STOP WITH YOUR ANTI-INTELLECTUAL FALLACY AND EVORANTS.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 weeks ago
@atheistcommonsense YOU ARE IRRATIONAL. NOBODY HAS SCIENCE/KNOWLEDGE ABOUT POND SCUM TO HUMAN EVOLUTION OR ANY OF THE OTHER ORIGINS FABLES/SCIENCE FICTION.
AIG HAS PEER REVIEWED PAPERS/JOURNALS/ARTICLES WHICH YOU MAKE A BIG DEAL ABOUT. UNLIKE THE FARCICAL UNSCIENTIFIC PEER REVIEWED PAPERS ABOUT IMAGINARY POND SCUM TO HUMAN EVOLUTION, AIG HAS REAL SCIENTISTS USING THE EMPIRICAL SCIENTIFIC METHOD.
WHAT SPECIFICALLY IS NOT TRUE? YOU DID NOT SAY.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 1 week ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN YEAH ACS, HE HAS ARTICLES. I READ THEM. AND PEER REVIEWED THEM. WHAT DO I DO? IM A PREACHER. OF COURSE I CAN'T TELL YOU THE NAMES OF THE PAPERS. I JUST USE CAPS TO ASSERT I AM RIGHT. I BUILD STRAWMEN LIKE "POND SCUM TO HUMAN" AND THAT MAKES MY "MAGIC GOD INSTA_HUMAN" CONCEPT SEEM SMARTER. IM GONNA SAY YOU THINK EVERYTHING CAME FROM NOTHING (BIGBANG LOL) WHEN ITS ACTUALLY MY MAGIC GOD THEORY THAT IS THE ONLY ONE CLAIMING SOMETHING FROM NOTHING.
You are an idiot.
jtheist32 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jtheist32 THE QUINTESSENTIAL MORON WHO ASSERTS WITHOUT SUBSTANTIATION AND IS CLUELESS OF THE STRAW MAN FALLACY HE USES HIMSELF. Hebrews 11:3 By faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that the things which are seen were not made of things which are visible.
THEREFORE, THE VISIBLE MATERIALS WERE MADE FROM INVISIBLE THINGS BY GOD. FROM NOW ON NEVER USE THIS STRAW MAN ARGUMENT AGAIN "MAGIC GOD THEORY THAT IS THE ONLY ONE CLAIMING SOMETHING FROM NOTHING". STOP LYING
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 1 week ago
@fourbabies1 Typical anti-intellectual ridicule rant from irrational evotards that worship the creation i.e. MATERIALISM (what is nonliving & mindless) instead of the living real and superior intelligent being called the God of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Jesus and all Real Christians.
WHY DO YOU STUPIDLY WORSHIP UNINTELLIGENT STUFF?
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 weeks ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN "....WORSHIP UNINTELLIGENT STUFF?"
start thinking or fuck off and leave me alone. idiot !!!
fourbabies1 2 weeks ago
@fourbabies1 Being a free rational thinker one can arrive at the following factual conclusions: Evolutionism is atheistic science fiction and the religion of the atheistic sort becuase the alleged fairytale events from pond scum all the way to humans was not and is not directly observed, testable or repeating or reproducible as the scientific method requires. A Materialistic origin is impossible since DNA code and specified instructions cannot come from mindless and lifeless chemical elements.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 weeks ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN "Evolution is atheistic science fiction.."
lol, you are a dickhead. stop reading from the likes of willy lane craig and ray bananaman comfort and start reading from people who actually study biology. till then, fuck off you superstitious idiot.
fourbabies1 2 weeks ago
@fourbabies1 Biology has nothing to do with the science fiction, fairy tale storytelling of pond scum to you evolution.
Do you not know that these so-called sciences and scientists are oxymoronic: evolutionary scientist, evolutionary biologist, evolutionary psychologist, evolutionary paleoanthropologist etc because they are hijacking evidence for imaginary presumed events that defy real science? THESE PEOPLE ARE DELUSION AND DO NOT KNOW REALITY FROM FICTION/FABLES/MYTHS.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 weeks ago
@MrJackomick
The fact is that Evolutionism is SCIENCE FICTION!
YOU HAVE NO FACTS ABOUT POND SCUM TO HUMAN EVOLUTION BECAUSE IT NEVER HAPPENED OR HAPPENS AND CANNOT HAPPEN IN DEFIANCE OF THE APPLICABLE LAWS OF SCIENCE. POND SCUM TO HUMAN EVOLUTION IS ONLY IMAGINED/PRESUMED. THESE FAIRY TALE JUST-SO-STORIES HAS BECOME THE RELIGION OF THE REPROBATE ATHESTIC SORT.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 weeks ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN Please tell me where you get your FACTS from when you preach Creationsim, I could make a Guess BUT i WOULD LIKE TO HEAR IT FROM YOU .
MrJackomick 2 weeks ago
@MrJackomick IT IS COMMON SENSE, TAUTOLOGICAL, THAT NOBODY SAW OR SEES POND SCUM TO HUMAN EVOLUTION, THAT IT DEFIES SCIENTIFIC LAWS, THAT POND SCUM TO HUMAN EVOLUTION IS ONLY JUST-SO-STORIES I.E. A FABLE/MYTH/SCIENCE FICTION, THAT EVOLUTION DOES NOT MAKE FOSSILS, NOR DOES UNIFORMITARIAN GEOLOGY, SO SEDIMENTARY LAYERS AND FOSSILS ARE HIJACKED BY EVIL EVOLUTIONISTS WITH FALSE CLAIMS FOR THEIR SCIENCE FICTION.
ANYONE USING COMMON SENSE WITH BASIC KNOWLEDGE WILL ARRIVE AT THIS SAME CONCLUSION.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 weeks ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN You still have not answed my question, is it to much for you , is it to basic a question , or is it because you only have one frame of reference , a dusty old codex.
MrJackomick 2 weeks ago
@MrJackomick FACTS that are being verified by Real Science is what God has claimed in the Bible i.e. Archaeologist continually find artifacts confirming the places, peoples and events the Bible documented by eyewitnesses, and operational sciences are catching up with what has claimed about His creation. For example God spoke things into existence, the DNA Code and Specified instructions/commands are the language/design from the mind of God which cannot come from a material medium to falsify EVO.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 weeks ago
@MrJackomick
I CAN'T STAND WORTHLESS FALLACIOUS HEARSAY! IF CANNOT INTELLECTUALY MUSTER AN INTELLIGENCE RESPONSE/REBUTTAL SHUT IT.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 weeks ago
@Parabol0086 YOUR PERSONAL OPINION IS WORTHLESS, WHO IN THEIR RIGHT MIND CARES?
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 weeks ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN
You again... Get a life, retard. To destroy Christianity and all God arguments are easy, if the person isn't retarded. I won't waste more of my time on you.
Parabol0086 2 weeks ago
@Parabol0086 PUT UP OR SHUT UP EVIL LYING ANTI-INTELLECTUAL ATHEIST.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 weeks ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN
Prove there is a god. Put up or die in a fire.
Parabol0086 2 weeks ago
@Parabol0086 YOU DID NOT PUT UP TO DEFEND YOUR HEARSAY COMMENT OF "To destroy Christianity and all God arguments are easy,..." THEREFORE SHUT UP MORON.
GOD EXISTS BECAUSE MINDLESS AND LIFELESS CHEMICAL ELEMENTS CANNOT CONTRIVE LANGUAGE, A CODE, OR THE BILLIONS OF SPECIFIED CODE FOR BIOLOGICAL MACHINES TO TRANSLATE AND TO ACT UPON TO MAKE YOUR PAIR OF EYES, EARS, LIMBS, ORGANS ETC. HUMAN INTELLIGENCE CANNOT DO IT SO A SUPERIOR INTELLIGENCE/BEING DID AS HE CLAIMS IN THE BIBLE.
NOW SHUT UP
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 weeks ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN
lulz, you fucking idiot. Go believe cain and abel fucked their mother to create the human race. And then noah's kids did the same thing to repopulate the Earth. Even though that sort of inbreeding would be disastrous after just a few generations if not from the start.
Don't worry god sent himself as a man but a god to kill himself to knowingly rise 3 days later to forgive our supposed sins that he could just forgive but loves violence... Some sacrifice.
Much more plausible...
Parabol0086 2 weeks ago
@Parabol0086 WOW YOU ARE EXTREMELY IGNORANT, MENTALLY ILL OR YOU ARE A WILFULL REPROBATE.
None of the children had sexual relations/children with their parents; the text does not support your lies evil atheist. Siblings intially married each other until the population grew for other options i.e. cousins and more distant family. Biologically this is not an issue from Adam & Eve or Noah's children with their diverse gene pool. Jesus is not the Father/God in the flesh to raise Himself.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 weeks ago
@Parabol0086 God prohibited inbreeding by the Israelites to keep the nation fit and healthy in the book of Leviticus which Darwin should have known in his seminary studies which his dad encourage since he was a scholastic failure in medicine and mathematics. This may explain why Charles Darwin like you cannot read for comprehension. Darwin erroneously promoted inbreeding for humans to better evolve, but God prohibited inbreeding because He knew the gene pool was weakened by inbreeding pressure.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 weeks ago
@Parabol0086 Jesus was sent by God into the world made of the virgin woman to be the Messiah/Christ. Jesus is not the Father/God. The Father is the God of Jesus and of all real Christians. Jesus was innocent before God [sinless though tested], as he was found innocent of all charges from the Jewish Leaders of the people by the Roman Government. Having lived a sinless life, he did offer himself on behave of humanity as the Lamb of God to satisfy the sin committed by humanity to be an reparation.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 weeks ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN
I searched who did cain marry, had a read through the first link, thought about you and laughed that people actually believe this shit.
So you think that inbreeding, which you say god was against, between bros and sis, and then cousins and cousins, is different or better than Darwin's family tree? Hmm. You're an idiot.
With that amount of inbreeding (as with "the south") should not have surprised god that they would be mischievous; they would all be mentally disabled..
Parabol0086 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Parabol0086 THE BIBLE IS EYEWITNESS HISTORICAL NARRATIVE; IT'S A FACT JACK.
ANYONE THAT BELIEVES IN MATERIALISM IS DELUSIONAL AND ANTI-INTELLECTUAL SINCE IT’S WITHOUT LOGIC, EVIDENCE AND CANNOT USE THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD.
IDIOTS USE THE STRAW MAN ARGUMENT.
WHEN ADAM AND EVE WERE FIRST MADE THEIR GENETIC POOL WAS RICH AND UNTAINTED. THE MARRIAGE OF SIBLINGS AND COUSINS ETC. WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN AN ISSUE. A GENETIC BOTTLENECK SCIENTIFICALLY CONFIRM BY MtDNA SUPPORTS THE GLOBAL FLOOD.
CONTINUED
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Parabol0086 THE GLOBAL FLOOD CAUSED A BOTTLENECK OF THE GENETIC POOL SINCE 3 FERTILE WOMEN SURVIVED TO REPOPULATE THE WORLD WHICH AT AN ANNUAL GROWTH RATE OF 0.46% IN 4300 YEARS YIELDS 7 BILLION PEOPLE TODAY [ON AN EVO-TIMELINE, THE GROWTH RATE IS RIDICULOUSLY LOW AND THE BONES ARE MISSING FROM THE TRILLIONS OF PEOPLE IF AT 0.46%]. BY THE TIME THE POPULATION GREW AND MOSES IS ON THE SEEN, INTERBREEDING IS PROHIBITED FOR THE ISRAELITES. THIS WAS ADOPTED BY CHRISTIANS, BUT NOT DARWIN'S EVOLUTION?
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Parabol0086 DARWIN WAS AN INBREEDING PROMOTER TO THE DETRIMENT OF HIS CHILDREN. HE WAS ALSO A PRODUCT OF INBREEDING AS MANY ROYALS WERE AS WELL. AS A RESULT THEY WERE LESS FIT/HEALTHY.
WHAT INBREEDING OF THE SOUTH ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT AND WHAT DOES IT HAVE TO DO WITH GOD PROHIBITING IT AND DARWIN PROMOTING IT?
ARE YOU INBREED AS EVIDENCE FROM YOUR BELIEVE IN NONSENSICAL AND UNSCIENTIFIC MATERIALISM, AND EVIL EVOLUTIONISM?
WHO IS THE IDIOT??? STOP LYING ATHEIST. IS THIS MORALITY OKAY?
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 weeks ago
@MrAnthonyfilms
I DID EVIL LYING ATHEIST.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 weeks ago
@atheistcommonsense The bible says God spoke all things into existence. THE DNA CODE AND SEMANTIC INSTRUCTIONS IN THE DNA OF ALL LIFE IS THE LANGUAGE AND DESIGN OF GOD! At the sub-atomic level it is suspected the coded information must exist somehow to make all chemical elements behave predictably as commanded/instructed by God.
STOP WORSHIPING THINGS CREATED I.E. MATERIALISM AND ONLY WORSHIP AND SERVE THE CREATOR AMEN!
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 weeks ago
Tell me do you have any higher education in biology, eve-devo, or physics (you rant on thermodynamics).
FactualCommentor 3 weeks ago in playlist Golden Crocoduck nominees 2012
Closed systems in terms of thermodynamics do exist. You meant to say ISOLATED systems do not exist. The latter statement is correct, your statement, however, is not correct
FactualCommentor 3 weeks ago in playlist Golden Crocoduck nominees 2012
This Dunning-Kruger victim probably believes that Moses was a real person who wrote the entire Pentateuch and that there aren't actually two creation myths in the "book" of Genesis.
Love to see him apply his highly sophisticated intellect to the construction of a 100 pound female human from a 9 ounce segment of bone.
Oh what was I thinking. god dun it.
HellRehab 3 weeks ago
@HellRehab How can you deny Moses as a real person thousands of years removed from his generation? Do you time travel or believe your personal hearsay opinion has any weight? Moses indeed wrote portions of Genesis and compiled the rest of the book of Genesis and the Pentateuch. YOU ARE MORON THAT CANNOT READ TO STATE THERE ARE TWO CREATION ACCOUNTS!
YOU ARE ALSO IGNORANT OF THE FACT THAT THE SPERM & EGG ARE SO SMALL AND FORM A BABY BY GODS INSTRUCTIONS IN DNA! WHAT IS THE WEIGHT RATIO MORON?
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 weeks ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN lol you say God created everything (w/o a lick of evidence) then say that creationist dont say they know everything. Obvious troll
atheistcommonsense 3 weeks ago
@atheistcommonsense the atheist without common sense or logic.I gave you the eyewitness evidence that is biblically documented by God and Adam by which creationist trust/know that God created all things. I gave the common sense evidence that only intelligent beings can contrive and that nonliving chemical elements that are devoid of intelligence cannot contrive biological life or transmute life from one form into a different kind of life form. This is scientific,evolutionism is science fiction!
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 weeks ago
@atheistcommonsense THE CREATIONIST DOES NOT DENY GOD AS IF HE WERE ALL KNOWING, BUT THE FALLACIOUS ATHEIST DOES WITHOUT SUBSTANTIATION. THE CREATIONIST DOES NOT CLAIM TO HAVE ALL KNOWLEDGE, HE BELIEVES THE BIBLICAL CLAIM I.E. GOD'S CLAIMS BY FAITH AND DOES NOT CLAIM THAT THEIR BELIEF IS THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD. THE CREATIONIST RATIONALLY CONCLUDES THAT A SUPERIOR INTELLIGENCE CAN MAKE A FLEA AND A PEA BECAUSE THE ATHEIST, EVOLUTIONIST, NONLIVING CHEMICAL ELEMENTS, AND INSECTS CANNOT. YOU FAILED
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 3 weeks ago
The fake laughter is more than I can endure. I checked out yer channel to see if this was parody. Ha ha ha, yuck yuck. You can't make this stuff huh-hup.
Ratings disabled. So...THUMBS DOWN THUMBS DOWN THUMBS DOWN THUMBS DOWN THUMBS DOWN THUMBS DOWN ETC.
HellRehab 3 weeks ago
@HellRehab
YOU LOVE THE WORTHLESS UNCIVILIZED ANTI-INTELLECTUAL RIDICULE FALLACY.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 3 weeks ago
@USERNAMEfieldempty SORRY TO BURST YOUR BUBBLE. THESE ARE NOT SCIENTISTS: EVOLUTIONARY-BIOLOGIST/ANTHROPOLOGIST/PSYCHOLOGIST/CHEMICST/COSMOLOGIST ETC. BECAUSE THE MYTHICAL BIG BANG FROM NOTHING INTO ALL THAT EXISTS IS ONLY IMAGINED/PRESUMED AS IS CHEMICAL EVOLUTION, BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION ETC. NONE OF THESE CAN USE THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD OF DIRECT OBSERVATION AND REPEATED TESTING OF A TESTABLE REPEATING PHENOMENON. ALL OF THE SO-CALLED SCIENTISTS ARE IRRESPONSIBLE AND FRAUDS SPREADING A HOAX.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
USERNAMEfieldempty 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN Either... biological science, the genetics industry, the petro-chemical industry, every university, all governments, healthcare, education etc are in a huge mysterious plot which hides the truth from everyone except YOU, a supra-genius, who can see through the lies which have fooled the rest of us.
Or... you're a paranoid schizo.
Guess which one I'm going for, Mr. Capslock?
USERNAMEfieldempty 3 weeks ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN "I'm the quiet type" he says, after spamming pages of pages in CAPS LOCK.
TheJo4an 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheJo4an SORRY TO BURST YOUR BUBBLE. THESE ARE NOT SCIENTISTS: EVOLUTIONARY-BIOLOGIST/ANTHROPOLOGIST/PSYCHOLOGIST/CHEMICST/COSMOLOGIST ETC. BECAUSE THE MYTHICAL BIG BANG FROM NOTHING INTO ALL THAT EXISTS IS ONLY IMAGINED/PRESUMED AS IS CHEMICAL EVOLUTION, BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION ETC. NONE OF THESE CAN USE THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD OF DIRECT OBSERVATION AND REPEATED TESTING OF A TESTABLE REPEATING PHENOMENON. ALL OF THE SO-CALLED SCIENTISTS ARE IRRESPONSIBLE AND FRAUDS SPREADING A HOAX.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 3 weeks ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN Prove it!
Helixbuilder 3 weeks ago
@Helixbuilder Anyone promulgating the pseudoscience of evil evolutionism is a liar. Nobody saw or sees lifeless and mindless chemical elements collaborating to contrive the alleged first simple self-replicating cell that is the supposed common ancestor of all and at the root of the bogus evolutionary tree of life. Human intelligence cannot make a living cell. Nobody saw or sees a simple cell transmute into all the life forms that ever lived. This evolutionary fairy tale is SCIENCE FICTION/LIES!
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 3 weeks ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN Show me the experiments that prove that this is not possible. Otherwise you are spouting an opinion. Secondly show where in the theory of abiogensis or evolution it states that "a simple cell transmute into all the life forms that ever lived ".
Helixbuilder 3 weeks ago
@Helixbuilder WOW do you know anything?
What is the alleged evolutionary tree of life and what is at its root which is the common ancestor of all? Watch youtube . com/user/HISTRUTHBEKNOWN?feature=mhee#p/a/u/1/Pi1Foiz6kqE
Do you know the work of Louis Pasteur and the Law of Biogenesis?
Do you know that humans cannot make a living cell using the elements of the periodic table despite the many attempts worldwide?
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 3 weeks ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN What point in abiogenesis don't you understand? Read some science literature rather than apologist's writings.Evolution deal with how life changes over time and abiogenesis is the theory of how life started.
Helixbuilder 3 weeks ago
@Helixbuilder Are you stupid? Abiogenesis is impossible without the superior intelligence of GOD. Humans, insects, animals, and of course mindless and lifeless chemical elements cannot contrive life.
STOP LYING EVIL ATHEIST. DARWIN YOUR BELOVED BONEHEADED BRIT SAID LIFE STARTED IN WARM POOLS OF WATER WITH CHEMICAL IN THEM. WITHOUT ABIOGENESIS, SPONTANEOUS GENERATION OF LIFE, DARWIN KNEW THERE WAS NO ORIGIN OF LIFE AND THE CONTINUUM OF CHANGE BY GRADUALISM WOULD NOT BE POSSIBLE. DUH
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 3 weeks ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN "Abiogenesis is impossible without the superior intelligence of GOD."
thats actually 100% false as it has been tested and proven that abiogenesis is very possible without god. in fact, abiogenesis absolutely did happen without the help of god.
MrAnthonyfilms 3 weeks ago
@MrAnthonyfilms LYING IS SO NATURAL FOR YOU IT FLOWS FROM YOU WITHOUT ANY OFFENSE TO YOUR CONSCIOUS OR SENSE OF INTELLECTUAL INTEGRITY AND DESIRE FOR REAL SCIENCE.
READ THE FOLLOWING TO EDUCATE YOURSELF ON WHY ABIOGENESIS IS IMPOSSIBLE
trueorigin . org/abio . asp
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 3 weeks ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN true origin is a fraudulent website filled with strait bullshit, half truths and dogma. theres absolutely nothing factual about that website.
MrAnthonyfilms 3 weeks ago
@MrAnthonyfilms FALLACIOUS HEARSAY. PUT UP OR SHUT UP I.E. SUBSTANTIATE YOU LAME USELESS REMARKS OR SHUT IT.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 3 weeks ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN read any modern biology book.
MrAnthonyfilms 3 weeks ago
@MrAnthonyfilms
Every sane Biologists knows evolutionism is science fiction and they know they cannot make a flea or a pea from chemical elements and that they cannot improve on God's design.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 weeks ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN ..... bananas? dogs? nearly everything you eat? we have genetically modified and IMPROVED biological organisms. thats a fact. and every sane biologist knows evolution is science fiction? 97% of biologists accept evolution, it's a fact. the other 3 percent are idiots like you.
i am a biologist by the way.
MrAnthonyfilms 2 weeks ago
@MrAnthonyfilms READ THIS RESEARCH PAPER EXPOSING THE MYTH THAT “Nothing in Biology Makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution”
answersingenesis . org/articles/arj/v5/n1/evolution-myth-biology
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 weeks ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN lol did you really link someone to answersingensis? That's hilarious!!!! Would you mind next time sending people to a REAL science journal, you know, something peer-reviewed.
atheistcommonsense 2 weeks ago
@atheistcommonsense
DID YOU SAY/SUGGEST SOMETHING IGNORANT LIKE, ANSWERSINGENESIS DOES NOT HAVE PEER REVIEWED JOURNALS OR SCIENTIST ON STAFF?
YES YOU DID!!!!
YOU ARE AN ANTI-INTELLECTUAL DEVOID OF COMMON-SENSE AND CIVILITY.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 weeks ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN I assure you it is most definitely NOT peer-reviewed. Its run by Ken Ham ffs. Clearly youre a troll
atheistcommonsense 2 weeks ago
@atheistcommonsense AIG HAS SCIENTISTS ON STAFF AND ASSOCIATES THAT CAN DO THE PEER REVIEW WORK.
EVIL EVOLUTIONIST HAVE OXYMORONIC PROFESSIONS CONDUCTING ABSURD PEER REVIEW OF IMAGINED/PRESUMED EVOLUTION FROM NOTHING TO EVERYTHING IN THE UNIVERSE AND BIOLOGICAL LIFE ON PLANET EARTH THAT ALL HAPPENED BY MINDLESS AND LIFELESS CHEMICAL ELEMENTS.
WHY NOT LET THE PEER REVIEW PROCESS ALSO HAPPEN BY MINDLESS AND LIFELESS CHEMICAL ELEMENTS I.E. NO UNINTELLIGENT EVIL EVOLUTIONISTS ALLOWED?
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 weeks ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN answers in genisis is a bullshit website filled with nothing but bullshit.
MrAnthonyfilms 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrAnthonyfilms PROVE IT. READ THE ARTICLE FROM THE GEOLOGIST AND PROVE HIM WRONG.
YOU CANNOT.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 weeks ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN Really? How many biologist do you know?
Helixbuilder 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Helixbuilder READ THIS RESEARCH PAPER EXPOSING THE MYTH THAT “Nothing in Biology Makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution”
answersingenesis . org/articles/arj/v5/n1/evolution-myth-biology
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 weeks ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN Scientifically you can not make this statement "Abiogenesis is impossible without the superior intelligence of GOD" Where is your evidence to show that you are right?
Helixbuilder 1 week ago
@Helixbuilder According to Sir Fred Hoyle, the odds of a cell forming naturalistically is 10^-40,000 which is zero. This is why Abiogenesis formerly called Spontaneous Generation is NEVER SEEN. THE NAME CHANGE FROM SPONTANEOUS GENERATION TO ABIOGENESIS OCCURRED BECAUSE IT WAS NEVER SEEN WHEN SPONTANEOUS GENERATION IMPLIES AN EVENT THAT WOULD BE VISIBLE.
ONLY A MIND MORE SUPERIOR THAN ALL THE MINDS OF HUMANS COMBINED COULD HAVE CONTRIVE A CHEMICAL CODE AND INSTRUCTIONS TO MAKE BIOLOGICAL LIFE.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 1 week ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN So how did Hoyle come up with that figure? He was an astrophysicists. So using him for a source for biological information is like going to an auto mechanic for a heart surgery consult.
Helixbuilder 1 week ago
@Helixbuilder Do the research yourself. It is not essential to be a biologist to figure out the odds of a cell randomly forming by naturalistic means. If you have an understanding of probabilities you can easily show that the odds are so ridiculous i.e. zero.
“No matter how large the environment one considers, life cannot have had a random beginning [...] . There are about two thousand enzymes, and the chance of obtaining them all"
THE CLUE IS ABOVE IF YOU CAN READ.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 1 week ago
@Helixbuilder Read this article and eliminate your ignorance.
trueorigin . org/abio . asp
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 4 days ago
@Helixbuilder
Eliminate your ignorance by reading this article:
trueorigin . org/abio . asp
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 4 days ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN OK then you read the article I gave you!
Helixbuilder 4 days ago
@Helixbuilder DO YOU UNDERSTAND NO? I DO NOT READ EVOLUTIONARY LIES ANY MORE.
NOBODY CAN CREATE LIFE OTHER THAN GOD. UNTIL THEN SHUT UP.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 4 days ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN OK I find it odd that Bergman doesn''t quote anything from Jack W. Szostak work.Why not comment on the most up to date research? The starting point for Bergman is a full blown bacteria, where Szostak starts with a protocell. Bergman's argument is a strawman. He misrepresents the work of others then hopes you don't look up any of the references.
Helixbuilder 4 days ago
@Helixbuilder Szostak does not start with chemical elements and it is not life moron.
"Of course, building an even very primitive functioning “cell” (if it can be done) is no easy task. Madrigal explains that the “life” Szostak is working on is nowhere near as complex as existing life: “Modern life is far more complex than the simple systems that Szostak and others are working on,” she writes, adding that Szostak’s “protocells don't look anything like the cells that we have in our bodies.”
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 4 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN Read the paper! 'The Origins of Cellular Life' Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a002212 published online May 19, 2010 by Jason P. Schrum, Ting F. Zhu and Jack W. Szostak
Helixbuilder 1 week ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN Hmm Thermo = heat dynamics = motion, The second law of thermodynamics is an expression of the tendency that over time, differences in temperature, pressure, and chemical potential equilibrate in an isolated physical system. OK Now what is your point? Where does complexity enter the definition?
Helixbuilder 3 weeks ago
@Helixbuilder
The second law of thermodynamics universally confirms a progression from order to disorder, from complexity to simplicity, in the physical universe that falsifies evolution which magically expects, rather needs the reverse.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 3 weeks ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN Prove it! Show me the thermodynamic equation that includes complexity!
Helixbuilder 3 weeks ago
@Helixbuilder
read
ldolphin . org/mystery/chapt7 . html
ldolphin . org/mystery/chapt8 . html
ldolphin . org/mystery/chapt9 . html
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 3 weeks ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN Read a textbook on thermodynamics.
Helixbuilder 3 weeks ago
@Helixbuilder DUH THE CHAPTERS I GAVE YOU TO READ ARE FROM A TEXT BOOK ON THERMODYNAMICS.
I READ THEM, HAVE YOU? PUT UP OR SHUT UP.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 3 weeks ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN So where are the equations with complexity in them? There aren't any!
Helixbuilder 3 weeks ago
@Helixbuilder Duh. There are many equations in the three chapters I gave you to read which apparently you cannot follow.
Define what you mean by complexity, what is entropy, and what do the 1st & 2nd Laws of Thermodynamics state.
All systems go from complex to simple, an apple and you are complex and when decay happens it and you become less complex.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 weeks ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN Really? Show me where the term for complexity is in the equations!.
Helixbuilder 2 weeks ago
@Helixbuilder DID YOU ANSWER MY QUESTIONS? IT APPEARS YOU ARE COMPLETELY CLUELESS OF WHAT 1ST, 2ND LAWS ARE AND WHAT ENTROPY IS AND WHY EACH STATE IS LESS COMPLEX THAT THE PRIOR STATE AS ALL THINGS WIND DOWN AFTER BEING WOUND UP BY INTELLIGENT BEINGS.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 weeks ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN Why are you so rude? I defined the 2nd Law earlier so for you to say the above is asinine! Thermodynamics is heat transfer and has nothing to do with complexity.
Helixbuilder 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Helixbuilder WHY ARE YOU NOT ANSWERING MY QUESTIONS? THAT IS RUDE TO AVOID MY QUESTION. YOU DO NOT KNOW WHAT ENTROPY AND DISORDER ARE. ANSWER MY QUESTIONS AND GET OFF YOUR SOAP BOX.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 weeks ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN This is not a textbook it is a book written about thermodynamics by some one with an agenda.
Helixbuilder 3 weeks ago
@Helixbuilder What is yout agenda when you say it is not a text book but a book written about thermodynamics by some one with a agenda?
I suspect you have no clue about the material covered in this book about thermodynamics applied to biologocal systems.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 weeks ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN Just look at the web page! I have many thermodynamics textbooks..They typically follow a pattern in presenting the information. A concept is introduced than there are exercises review and then repeat.. The web page does not it the pattern. It presents definitions not supported by the mathematical formula and editorials about evolution.
Helixbuilder 2 weeks ago
@Helixbuilder WHAT ARE YOU TRYING TO SAY? YOU DID NOT ANSWER MY QUESTION. WHAT IS YOUR AGENDA?
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 weeks ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN My agenda... understanding.
Helixbuilder 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Helixbuilder IF YOU TRULY WANT UNDERSTANDING, START BY FEARING GOD AND ASKING FOR WISDOM. THEN GET KNOWLEDGE AND THEN YOU WILL HAVE UNDERSTANDING.
LEARN THE ANSWERS TO MY QUESTIONS.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 weeks ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN You are joking right? I'm trying to understand how you got the facts so screwed up!
Helixbuilder 2 weeks ago
@Helixbuilder There is no joking on my part. What facts are screwed up? You waste comment space and time when you are not clear or substantiate yourself.
The second law and the first law of thermodynamics falsify the general theory of EVIL EVOLUTIONISM!
You have no understanding of the concept of entropy, disorder, complexity, and that the second law applies to chemistry, biology, mechanical/thermo systems whether open closed or isolated.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 weeks ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN How? Do you want me to derive the second law? You don't understand it period. If you did you could correctly answer the following;Which state of water has greater entropy and complexity; ice or boiling water?
Helixbuilder 2 weeks ago
@Helixbuilder I gave you a series of questions you have not answered; will you answer them?
Ice has a lower entropy becuse its order is higher, and water and gases have higher entropy because the order is lower.
I answered your question. Answer my questions.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 weeks ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN Boiling water has a greater complexity than ice! Don't believe me predict where a water molecule will be in ice or boiling water. So entropy CAN increase and so can entropy! Welcome to the real world!
Helixbuilder 2 weeks ago
@Helixbuilder "So entropy CAN increase and so can entropy! Welcome to the real world! " <<<<< CORRECTION REQUIRED
It is tautological in the second law of thermodynamics that entropy can increase and decrease, that order can increase or decrease, the complexity can decrease to become simpler.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 weeks ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN Sorry for the typo! The 2nd to the last sentence should read; So entropy CAN increase and so can complexity.
Helixbuilder 2 weeks ago
1st Law; energy or matter can neither be created nor destroyed. 2nd Law:heat flows spontaneously form a hot body to cold; the energy that cannot be converted to work is entropy.
Helixbuilder 2 weeks ago
@HeYlixbuilder Yes the first is correct, also known as the conservation of energy. Therefore, evolutionism's big bang is falsified since nothing cannot create matter/energy, only God could.
The second law is more univesal than just dealing with the flow of heat energy. Heat flow is the simple example used for teaching its basics.
How are chemical compounds, biological compounds/tissues/organisms etc affected by the second law? What work/energy is required to maintain systems temporarily?
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 weeks ago