I cant wait to see how clustering in windows in the near future will allow us to share this performance. . Eventually This tech could replace the need to upgrade computers and every one will look at the "Folding" rating of there pc in the priority it has with the servers.
I like the proscessing power to run GAMESS (General Atomic and Molecular Electronic Structure System) software in parallel mode... while more cores and speed, better...
NICE AMD LOVE YOU but oem and local bilder systems does not provide none of your products because they are paid not to guuess by who ??? intel
these afirmation is true I know a lot of people involved in IT they are managers and they said these thinks to me.PLEASE TAKE SOME ACTION AGAINST intel.
@undefinedArray Two 8 core AMD Opteron processors on a ASUS KGPE-D16 board would be a sick setup, but I don't wanna waste my money if it cannot play any FPS games. I have looked everywhere, there's no fucking answer if a machine like that is stable enough to play games. I've youtubed Opteron gameplay, and googled. There's nothing related or any answers pertaining to these server computers being able to play games. Like I said, I'd rather not waste money if the AMD Opteron 6174's can't play. ;)
Look honestly I was trying to say higher hz with higher frames looks closer to real life motion rather than 60fps@60hz. I'm not trying to overthrow your perspective just saying there is a difference. The notepad was a bad example so you can stop your flaming.
@MrAlexanderTV Do you really think this thing can run billions games? in this prosessor what dont have enought cores to run even 100 games(3D games vith low graphic will crash because lac of memory, hdd speed, video memory and more. To run so many games it can be done by computer hives in one set up. But that will cost even if technology is so good that it cant be better never:DXDX
I wish they'd stop throwing more cores at us. I don't want more cores that all but a couple of programs can't even take advantage of. And gaming is the worst application for all these 6 and 12 and 48 cores. Your typical game will not even be maxing the processor but the GPU is its bottleneck.
@beavismagnum not really, amd has multiple opteron cpu's ranging from 800~1600. Even so four intel i7 950's (800 dollars) would own the opteron by a long shot.
@AphamX only problem is you can't have four i7 950s on one board. this is why these are SERVER CPUs. they are NOT targeting the consumer market, just as the i7 950 does not target the server market. theres is a market for these CPUs (they sell don't they?) you, however, clearly don't understand it.
@beavismagnum are you reading what I'm writing?! I know i7's aren't server cpus, that's why I said you can cluster them =.=. Xeons beat the opteron still, you can even check benchmarks and comparisons, xeons still outperforms the opteron.
@The91489 AMD Opteron 6176 12 cores around 1,300. Two Intel i7 950's outperforms it, I could but 6 for 1,200, cluster them and psh, shit loads faster than the Opteron. But hey, I'm comparing a server processor to a regular desktop processor. Let's cut to the chase. Intel Xeon = Server Processor, 6 cores 6 Logical, Opteron = 12 cores, Intel Xeon is about 300 dollars less yet it outperforms the Opteron. This is why I trust Intel with my renderfarm cpu's. All five of my comps run Intel.
@AphamX you must not be looking up your research in the right places amd out performs intel in every way, price,performance,temp,technology i mean when it comes down to it when amd releases there bulldozer cores this year intel is out period end of disscusion look up the bulldozer architecture intel cant come close its a 30 nm 8-10-12 core processors they even have one up to 24 cores hmm whats intels max like 12 ha like i said intels done
i feel bad for amd i hope their next acrhitecture will rape intel, clearly intel has the market in selling cpu's buuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuttttttttttttttt amd is really cheap and i LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE their gpu's, I think amd should major in their graphics cards and not cpu, obviosly the normal person gives a shit less about cpu's for gaming they just want great graphics soooooooooooo gpu's will sell like porn being selled to little kids
@mowcno444 deep blue is a different beast with dedicated chess chips. The version of 1997 was twice as fast as the one in 1996 and was about 11 gflops total (I suppose without counting the chess chips) and ranked at the 259th place in 1997. One amd opteron core is about 10 gflops so this system is 480 gflops. The fastest computer in 1996 was a 2048 core 150mhz hitachi and did 450 gflops. The ASCI Red in 1997 reached about 1300 gflops on 4500x 200mhz pentium pro
@Myztik7 Well guess what! I'm the person who has to go into Data Centers with a jacket on to service equipment. So people do hear it. Its too loud, btw where are you located? Because where I am I can drive down to AMD headquarters and tell the front desk its too loud! lol. Norcal!
Intel just developed 48 core processor on a single die!!So if u had a board that has 4 sockets (like the one in the vid) for that cpu u could have a 192 cores i a single pc
would it be possible to set up a Magny-Cours rig with 48 cores, and have 24 thin clients(2 cores per client) and just have this one server crunching for a whole classroom of kids?
Lol @ you guys talking about gaming on this. Processors like this weren't made for gaming. Most programs (including games) won't use like 90%+ of these cores so don't even think about buying something like this if you're a gamer
Sometimes, GHz cannot be determine alone, and this also may apply to cores. Other factors must also be taken into consideration. AMD is okay. But I still would rather stay with Intel.
Someone asked if you could use this with a desktop OS like Win 7. Yes and no. A desktop OS will only support 2 sockets, it will support as many cores that will fit on those two sockets. Win 7 would only show 24 cores. 2 sockets x 12 cores. If you wanted to use all 4 cores you would need a server OS. Now in 2011 AMD plans to release a 16 core. So 2 sockets x 16 cores = 32 cores. Win 7 would support all 32 cores. Bottom line, pointless to buy a MB with more than 2 Sockets for desktop OS.
@ezkeyboardkid58 i see some jealousy there :D just to remind you Intel =4 cores as you stated above Quad Core, then there's (48) cores you gotta admit that's tasty
@ezkeyboardkid58 sorry if i ofend you but: THE INTEL CACHE IS MIRRORED, the cache u can use = the amount of l3 cache. amd has 48 way l3 cache while intel has 16 way. (AMD.s l2 cache is 16 way)
its not a 48 core processor its 4 processors on one motherboard with 4 cores each and then with hyperthreading or whatever amd's version of hyperthreading is. either way still impressive
@Daftpunkfan123 You see, I wouldn't mention how many computers it could run Crysis on max, I would mention it could probably run Crysis on 2000 Fps LOL :D
My calculator got more cores :D
Richieres979 2 weeks ago 2
@Richieres979 pff!! yeah? my potato have more... xD
TommyDDoom 2 days ago
but intel and IBM make 128thread. 68 core?
zulboy01 2 weeks ago
damn i need this for bf3 :D ^^
Alkahdaniel 3 weeks ago
@Alkahdaniel will bring you zero benefit...
Invisiman 3 weeks ago
@Invisiman really ? did you ever heared something, called irony ?
Alkahdaniel 3 weeks ago
M0AR C0ERS!1
Nvidiaguides 4 weeks ago
o ye , that's on my wish list now :>
datifocmah 4 weeks ago
I cant wait to see how clustering in windows in the near future will allow us to share this performance. . Eventually This tech could replace the need to upgrade computers and every one will look at the "Folding" rating of there pc in the priority it has with the servers.
akmo23 1 month ago
nice comp
i think i could blow a whole minecraft map into hell with a that strong machine without crashing
web1bastler 1 month ago
@web1bastler nah, only time you will be able to do that is when they get rid of java :P
Pieh0 1 month ago
can i buy this pc? i want to play battlefief 3
317Rangers 1 month ago
a normal game only uses 1-2 cores like crysis so...
TommyDDoom 1 month ago
Intel just got left behind? XD
D4ilyChase 1 month ago
...
AliferLS 1 month ago
This CPU is RECTANGULAR. It's not a typical square processor.
1yoyo105 1 month ago
Bottom Right = Rebel Core.
suicidalSPUD118 1 month ago
48x ___GhZ = ___ ???????
denidz94 1 month ago
WTF? O.O O.O O.O O.O O.O O.O O.O O.O O.O
Therayden02 1 month ago
that coon is not in the right place shouldnt he be hyjacking a car? or robbing a 7/11?
levianthan28 2 months ago
can it run notepad?
WekyMon 2 months ago
hey guys that's not funny!!!
Ich123423 2 months ago
^Can it run Super Mario?? I think no
1337SkiLLeRCss 2 months ago
it run tetris?
rev148 2 months ago
Comment removed
FadiAbdalkhalk 2 months ago
And the computer security is the black guy
TutorialsByKevin 3 months ago
Get this cpu and AMD WILL offer you an AC unit to cool it down :)
ddRjM 3 months ago
OMG !!!
48 CORES :O
My Wish !!! xD
asus913 3 months ago
Ok, 48 cores! I'm sure fsx will lag anyways!
AN225brando 3 months ago
@AN225brando i don't think so...^_^
spiroslouis1 3 months ago
@AN225brando so true!
ddRjM 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Run Cinebench 11.5 on it.
SapphireHD5850Xtreme 3 months ago
he's previous job fas facecontrol at a clubs outdoor .
Emeengor 3 months ago
playing gta 4 on this , i think its like playing solitare on pentium 4,hahaha
BigSnooop 3 months ago
48X2.0 Ghz = 96GHZ prozessor speed
denidz94 4 months ago
@denidz94 you cant calculate the processor speed like this ...
MrX13415 3 months ago
@MrX13415 so you cant play a game witch needs an 3.0 Ghz processor on this processor well
MrX13415 3 months ago
@denidz94 ghz is only frequency, not necessarily speed.
MouthofSaurons 2 months ago
And what is the price?
i want one XD
nargarothfreak666 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
48 cores + 48Gb of memory = 48 frames rendered at same time in After Effects. Yay!
izvarzone 4 months ago
Comment removed
izvarzone 4 months ago
can it run tetris?
farosonico 4 months ago
@IAmSomeoneOrOther intel has an 80 core, on a single chip if im not wron, not an intel fanboy, i use an 1055t, but you have to face the facts
afonso360 4 months ago
Is that Cee Lo?
sangolt88 4 months ago
lol
pokol666war 4 months ago
Still slower than Intel.
TheMuffinManshow 5 months ago
@TheMuffinManshow Depends.
SuckerBullet 5 months ago
@TheMuffinManshow derp.
MinpAndCorey4Eva 5 months ago
Мудаки на! Чё вы тут говно месите? Это сервер на хуя ему запускать Crysis или пусть даже Minecraft? Мудаки и ещё раз мудаки!
InfinityShikai 5 months ago
But will it blend???
bradthebad01 5 months ago
now i can watch 48 pornos at the same time
ahart5530 5 months ago
Ooohhh Intel 16 cores*4= 64 cores (128 threads!) :OOO
Cursecut3r 5 months ago
@Cursecut3r Intel doesn't have a 16-core processor. The highest end one they have is an 8 core.
IAmSomeoneOrOther 5 months ago
@IAmSomeoneOrOther Is a 10 core, but generally you put more than one processor together for something like what is shown in the video.
Amuffin456 4 months ago
i would like to run 3ds max with Vray render
giohammett 5 months ago
thath thing is for server not for playing games.....
sv3tlqza 6 months ago
48 core computer running Windows is a waste!
janchaan 6 months ago
God, don't mess with AMD: their marketing manager will rip you in half....
ashinms 6 months ago
New Opterons might have 16 cores.
Repne64Bit 6 months ago
the guy looks like a bouncer at a night club
michiel357753 6 months ago
I like the proscessing power to run GAMESS (General Atomic and Molecular Electronic Structure System) software in parallel mode... while more cores and speed, better...
barbarotico 7 months ago
@AMDUnprocessed You look like Cee Lo Green! Lol! :)
Do you sing FK You???
mrschmelterrox 7 months ago
BADASS!!! PROCESSOR! FUCK!!
xXDMS2k11Xx 7 months ago
NICE AMD LOVE YOU but oem and local bilder systems does not provide none of your products because they are paid not to guuess by who ??? intel
these afirmation is true I know a lot of people involved in IT they are managers and they said these thinks to me.PLEASE TAKE SOME ACTION AGAINST intel.
marianxtreme 8 months ago
NICE AMD LOVE YOU
marianxtreme 8 months ago
i just saw this video for the first time and just about nut myself when he said 48 cores & then amd on top of that, wow!!! ^_^
neosmith80 8 months ago
Making a couple o' porn servers at great prices i'm gonna get rich!!!!!!! : )
bornwisedistruction 8 months ago
this is not for game guys...this is for crytical situation on industry or bussines :)
totoksilalahi 8 months ago
noise as hell
NewRisingSong 9 months ago
48 cores lol !!!
i have 2 and my pc power is ok for ME !
wow amd youre best !
nice price !
and Quality!
vahit1234 9 months ago 32
Can it run crysis?
undefinedArray 10 months ago 48
@undefinedArray no ...
AMD has broken in crysis :'/
go intel XEON E7500
capatais777 10 months ago
@capatais777 Better yet, dual X5680's on a SR-2 board...since you can actually play games on those Xeon processors and not Opteron server CPU's.
Phenomental1ty 9 months ago
@undefinedArray i love crysis
the % in this video are 60 - 100 running far cry 1 (cryengine 1) on minimun settings
capatais777 9 months ago
@undefinedArray No, its a server based processor.
SOF006 8 months ago
@undefinedArray no thats not the question
so can it run farmville????
dote21 7 months ago
@undefinedArray Two 8 core AMD Opteron processors on a ASUS KGPE-D16 board would be a sick setup, but I don't wanna waste my money if it cannot play any FPS games. I have looked everywhere, there's no fucking answer if a machine like that is stable enough to play games. I've youtubed Opteron gameplay, and googled. There's nothing related or any answers pertaining to these server computers being able to play games. Like I said, I'd rather not waste money if the AMD Opteron 6174's can't play. ;)
Phenomental1ty 7 months ago
@undefinedArray Crysis will only need 4 of the 48 cores...
champion1642 6 months ago
@undefinedArray Probably not smooth...
MrL22 6 months ago
@undefinedArray trust me , it can't :|
Arcaged 3 months ago
@undefinedArray you mean minecraft
singlesoul17 3 months ago
@undefinedArray be pretty F up if it couldn't!
agello24 2 months ago
@undefinedArray Can it run Minecraft?
FadiAbdalkhalk 2 months ago
@undefinedArray
No. To play Crysis you need 128 cores. *LOL*
FlashGamesMaster 1 month ago
Thank you for counting to 48 for me, I really was struggling at 8.
FalconsFlame 10 months ago 5
WHAT THE FUCK...i tought my 4 cores are much....lol
k3v1nfbr 10 months ago
@k3v1nfbr This isnt for consumers. Its for servers.
marcyboy123 9 months ago 2
10,000 FPS FTW!
Phenomental1ty 10 months ago
Look honestly I was trying to say higher hz with higher frames looks closer to real life motion rather than 60fps@60hz. I'm not trying to overthrow your perspective just saying there is a difference. The notepad was a bad example so you can stop your flaming.
TruXByakuya 10 months ago
*WTF? 48cores? :~)
jeenormus 11 months ago
with quad 6990 HD
and 24 gb corsir dem
Awsome!!!!!
mnmosh2008 1 year ago
this guy look like a bouncer
munteanuioan 1 year ago
Awesome all the games on the wourld could be played at the same time with NO LAG :P
MrAlexanderTV 1 year ago
@MrAlexanderTV Do you really think this thing can run billions games? in this prosessor what dont have enought cores to run even 100 games(3D games vith low graphic will crash because lac of memory, hdd speed, video memory and more. To run so many games it can be done by computer hives in one set up. But that will cost even if technology is so good that it cant be better never:DXDX
Giljotiin 1 year ago
AMD RULESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!
Khalixth0 1 year ago
I wish they'd stop throwing more cores at us. I don't want more cores that all but a couple of programs can't even take advantage of. And gaming is the worst application for all these 6 and 12 and 48 cores. Your typical game will not even be maxing the processor but the GPU is its bottleneck.
nexus1g 1 year ago
@nexus1g which is why 12 cores are marketed specifically and only for servers. they actually can take advantage of a huge number of cores.
beavismagnum 1 year ago
@beavismagnum The problem is lack of alternatives for the consumer market.
nexus1g 1 year ago
@nexus1g there are plenty of alternatives, just most or all of the better options (depending on price range) come from Intel
beavismagnum 1 year ago
Intel Extreme 6 cores > AMD Opteron 12 cores...
AphamX 1 year ago
@AphamX and costs more
beavismagnum 1 year ago
@beavismagnum not really, amd has multiple opteron cpu's ranging from 800~1600. Even so four intel i7 950's (800 dollars) would own the opteron by a long shot.
AphamX 1 year ago
@AphamX no they wouldnt even come close do your research before speaking
The91489 1 year ago
@AphamX only problem is you can't have four i7 950s on one board. this is why these are SERVER CPUs. they are NOT targeting the consumer market, just as the i7 950 does not target the server market. theres is a market for these CPUs (they sell don't they?) you, however, clearly don't understand it.
beavismagnum 1 year ago
@beavismagnum are you reading what I'm writing?! I know i7's aren't server cpus, that's why I said you can cluster them =.=. Xeons beat the opteron still, you can even check benchmarks and comparisons, xeons still outperforms the opteron.
AphamX 1 year ago
@AphamX wrong the opteron out performs do your reseach
The91489 1 year ago
@The91489 AMD Opteron 6176 12 cores around 1,300. Two Intel i7 950's outperforms it, I could but 6 for 1,200, cluster them and psh, shit loads faster than the Opteron. But hey, I'm comparing a server processor to a regular desktop processor. Let's cut to the chase. Intel Xeon = Server Processor, 6 cores 6 Logical, Opteron = 12 cores, Intel Xeon is about 300 dollars less yet it outperforms the Opteron. This is why I trust Intel with my renderfarm cpu's. All five of my comps run Intel.
AphamX 1 year ago
@AphamX you must not be looking up your research in the right places amd out performs intel in every way, price,performance,temp,technology i mean when it comes down to it when amd releases there bulldozer cores this year intel is out period end of disscusion look up the bulldozer architecture intel cant come close its a 30 nm 8-10-12 core processors they even have one up to 24 cores hmm whats intels max like 12 ha like i said intels done
The91489 1 year ago
it's 4 processors 12 cores each in 1 system, not a single processor with 48 cores
and just you wait till' Intel brings out a 100 core system (Intel FTW!)
TheUltimateAddict 1 year ago
@TheUltimateAddict actually intel said they would focus on making fewer, more efficient cores. keep in mind they already have SMT cores anyway
beavismagnum 1 year ago
@TheUltimateAddict intel isnt that smart lol
The91489 1 year ago
it's 4 processors 12 cores each in 1 system, not a single processor with 48 cores
TheUltimateAddict 1 year ago
i feel bad for amd i hope their next acrhitecture will rape intel, clearly intel has the market in selling cpu's buuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuttttttttttttttt amd is really cheap and i LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE their gpu's, I think amd should major in their graphics cards and not cpu, obviosly the normal person gives a shit less about cpu's for gaming they just want great graphics soooooooooooo gpu's will sell like porn being selled to little kids
skimowhite586 1 year ago
@skimowhite586 OOOOOOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR they could focus on fusion, which literally is the future of technology.(ultimately SOC)
beavismagnum 1 year ago
As fast as the world fastest supercomputer in 1996
spikkel70 1 year ago
@spikkel70 No its much faster than that.
mowcno444 1 year ago
@spikkel70 The fasters computer in 1996 was deep blue which is a 30 core 120mhz ;)
mowcno444 1 year ago
@mowcno444 deep blue is a different beast with dedicated chess chips. The version of 1997 was twice as fast as the one in 1996 and was about 11 gflops total (I suppose without counting the chess chips) and ranked at the 259th place in 1997. One amd opteron core is about 10 gflops so this system is 480 gflops. The fastest computer in 1996 was a 2048 core 150mhz hitachi and did 450 gflops. The ASCI Red in 1997 reached about 1300 gflops on 4500x 200mhz pentium pro
spikkel70 1 year ago
i have 1 core ROFL
XareSoft 1 year ago
i have 2 cores :)
brandonio91 1 year ago
48 núcleos ... wow...
elbuenpepito 1 year ago
Nice, but didn't mentioned number of sockets, hyperthreading etc.
gmbabar 1 year ago
WOW WOW
control725 1 year ago
OMG those cooling fans just kills it. I know the audio sounds compressed but damn, it sounds like a jet engine!
Romxero 1 year ago
@Romxero It's a server..
Myztik7 1 year ago
Comment removed
Romxero 1 year ago
@Romxero The description says it's a server, the tags says it's a server, it sounds like a server, it's running a server OS.
It's a server.
Myztik7 1 year ago
Comment removed
Romxero 1 year ago
@Romxero Because servers are not made to be quiet, except for those intended for standing under your desk.
Myztik7 1 year ago
@Myztik7 I don't care, it is still too loud. That thing doesn't look like its in a data center to me. Even if it is its too loud.
Romxero 1 year ago
@Romxero You're an idiot.
Myztik7 1 year ago
@Myztik7 Yes I am!I like dog on the pizza and its seven! :-PHonestly my cluster isn't even that loud, way to loud!
Romxero 1 year ago
@Romxero It can't be too loud when it's supposed to be in a location where nobody can be able to hear it...
Myztik7 1 year ago
@Myztik7 Well guess what! I'm the person who has to go into Data Centers with a jacket on to service equipment. So people do hear it. Its too loud, btw where are you located? Because where I am I can drive down to AMD headquarters and tell the front desk its too loud! lol. Norcal!
Romxero 1 year ago
Still can't run tetris.
Edge0fPain 1 year ago
@Edge0fPain LOL XD
MrNikname 1 year ago
raytracing crysis on that ;)
cssful 1 year ago
He looks like a cave man.
dinnerandashow 1 year ago
Intel just developed 48 core processor on a single die!!So if u had a board that has 4 sockets (like the one in the vid) for that cpu u could have a 192 cores i a single pc
luigi4562 1 year ago
@luigi4562 And then you would instantly become God.
HabeKeinMitleid 1 year ago
Could just be a flash video :d future =today sif
narcarsiss 1 year ago
why are those cores working like half and that with 48 cores....
mothekiller1 1 year ago
@mothekiller1 its a stress test like super pi or cinebench
splice247 1 year ago
getting ready for crysis 5... O.o
FizzProductionsXXX 1 year ago
0:30 4 processors x 12 cores :| Lol not 1 !
MrRraresh 1 year ago
@MrRraresh wheres intels 12 core then?
splice247 1 year ago
would it be possible to set up a Magny-Cours rig with 48 cores, and have 24 thin clients(2 cores per client) and just have this one server crunching for a whole classroom of kids?
thebeetalls 1 year ago
@thebeetalls yes it is. But don't have to specify the cores for each client. Workload will spread out accordingly...
exceptional1414 1 year ago
a VRAY render with this new toy would be super fast...!!!! perhaps seconds per frame?
Really really cool...!
rickymontero 1 year ago
i will give you $1 for it and put my pc and windows 7 rate it 7.9 then overclock it
bobbycat711 1 year ago
Lol @ you guys talking about gaming on this. Processors like this weren't made for gaming. Most programs (including games) won't use like 90%+ of these cores so don't even think about buying something like this if you're a gamer
ownedufoo2 1 year ago
Sometimes, GHz cannot be determine alone, and this also may apply to cores. Other factors must also be taken into consideration. AMD is okay. But I still would rather stay with Intel.
1AppleMaker 1 year ago
what a dope computer case, with that fat AMD logo on it where did they get that??
KlingonSpider 1 year ago
correction wisfalls is on 2012 when bulldozer enter to the server market, 2 years later of the magny cours
ZELDARK23 1 year ago
Someone asked if you could use this with a desktop OS like Win 7. Yes and no. A desktop OS will only support 2 sockets, it will support as many cores that will fit on those two sockets. Win 7 would only show 24 cores. 2 sockets x 12 cores. If you wanted to use all 4 cores you would need a server OS. Now in 2011 AMD plans to release a 16 core. So 2 sockets x 16 cores = 32 cores. Win 7 would support all 32 cores. Bottom line, pointless to buy a MB with more than 2 Sockets for desktop OS.
wisfalls 1 year ago
I pity da fool who don't want 48 cores.
EnglanderUK 1 year ago
holy mother of crap!!!! 48 cores!?!?!?!?!? this processor spit in intel!-
CamoteMaster 1 year ago
i'll laugh and cry at the same time if this can't run Crysis at max
childofdreamz 1 year ago
@childofdreamz amd is shitty intels quad cores have 12mb l3 cache
ezkeyboardkid58 1 year ago
@ezkeyboardkid58 i see some jealousy there :D just to remind you Intel =4 cores as you stated above Quad Core, then there's (48) cores you gotta admit that's tasty
haverhilldogblue 1 year ago
@ezkeyboardkid58 sorry if i ofend you but: THE INTEL CACHE IS MIRRORED, the cache u can use = the amount of l3 cache. amd has 48 way l3 cache while intel has 16 way. (AMD.s l2 cache is 16 way)
intel inside = idiot outside
adolf512 1 year ago
when will the 12 core desktop (phenom) comes out?
machvelocy 1 year ago
@machvelocy codename bulldozer, next year maybe...
freego56 1 year ago
holly shit... this is freaking monster
When is the release date?
future is fusion xD
DarthPro 1 year ago
Cool !
SiberianTiger91 1 year ago
I have the Specifications of The AMD OPTERON on my channel!!!
AmbitiousERIC 1 year ago
the guy looks like a bouncer of a nightclub ^^
r8qt7 1 year ago
can you try Crysis benchmark :P
this server and two 5970 if it's posible
\'''/ (-.-)\'''/
AMD FTW
svampebob007 1 year ago
its not a 48 core processor its 4 processors on one motherboard with 4 cores each and then with hyperthreading or whatever amd's version of hyperthreading is. either way still impressive
kadillacking 1 year ago
No they actually have 12 cores each.
SomeMoreVideos2468 1 year ago
no, it's 4 cpu with 12 core each (no hyperthreading)
NilNeiro 1 year ago
OMG intel ... attention !
Galirouslan 1 year ago
Imagine this with a bunch of 5970s. I bet you could run Crysis maxed out on like 20 computers.
Daftpunkfan123 1 year ago 26
@Daftpunkfan123 Your retarded. Server processes function much differently then desktop processors.
fightoflife4 1 year ago
@fightoflife4 Cool Story Bro.
Daftpunkfan123 1 year ago
@Daftpunkfan123
or the nvidia tesla
fieserHund94 1 year ago
@Daftpunkfan123 lol yeah i know.
Rrichthe3 1 year ago
@Daftpunkfan123 Cores have hardly anything to do with graphics wise.
AndyMacProGamer 1 year ago
@Daftpunkfan123 u mean two 5970
xTYROCKx 1 year ago
@Daftpunkfan123 You see, I wouldn't mention how many computers it could run Crysis on max, I would mention it could probably run Crysis on 2000 Fps LOL :D
JoDaddyy 1 year ago
@Daftpunkfan123 Wow, Crysis, what a purpose for such an processor!
Come on, wake up these things are not made for gaming!
Tubecookie1234 1 year ago
@Daftpunkfan123
With at least 150 FPS on 1920 x 1080 resolution i would be satisfied.
SutkasFan 1 year ago