Added: 1 year ago
From: OurCountryPAC
Views: 37,404
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (424)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This guy has got things all backwards

  • could this not more boldly show fox news bias

  • This was just sloppy. But I really do like some of Dylans other rants, and I am concerned with some of the loons that say they are tea party (moral majorities and Racists)

  • The whole notion that a particular party is full of racists is so disingenuous. As if the Demorats don't have racists in it's party. An idiotic posture to takeand totally unconfirmable.

  • @rrhynes

    If Democrats have racists in their party, they why do we have a brown skinned man as Our Current President with a name who Conservatives won`t except into Americanism?,

    And How come Conservative Republican Voters have to resort to violence or murder at the voting booths or public events, to express their political views and win, while Liberal Democratic Supporters can express Our Political Views, Verbally and Safely? Example: Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D) of Arizona.

    - Dwight

  • @djthereplay You're kidding me right? Surely, you aren't that naive.

  • @rrhynes

    I'm just basically telling you what I`m seeing.

    If the other one about the violence at public events, etc to get your political point access does not fit what you do?, Then I`m not talking about you there. Now, we are down to the question about Democrats having racists. For you, It's the question about how we have a brown skinned man with a (D) next to his name who's name most conservatives won't except into Americanism to actually make my 1st question clearer 2 u.

    - Dwight

  • @djthereplay Okay. Let's make sure we understand why Obama is president. The first group are teh college students, who are idealistic and not yet jaded enough to have lost faith. The second group were the blacks and browns. I don't think I need to explain why they would vote for a black(in color only) Democrat. The last group are the white liberals that either felt guilty not voting for him or did so because it was "en vogue" to do so. To imply that he won for any other reason is just nonsense.

  • @rrhynes

    The other group who voted for Obama is the group that is tired of money wasted to a bunch of holy wars for nothing killing our troops overseas for nothing started by a bunch of Self Benefiting, Corporate Christian Conservative American 9/11 Bribery, and Fruitful American Job Creation Overseas in other countries .... and not at home.

    Cont'd on my next post.

    - Dwight

  • @rrhynes

    Cont`d from my last post. ..... And for you to call College Students not yet jaded enough to have lost faith?

    I`ll give you losing faith. Losing faith is People in other countries appreciating American Products made by American Companies better than we Americans do. (Look how we link our cell phones to a risk of cancer, and American Job Creation Overseas and creating less to no jobs in America)

    Cont'd on my next post.

    - Dwight

  • @rrhynes

    Cont`d from my last post .

    Really, Losing faith is Not regulating Beer, Cigarettes, etc. But Regulating Foods, Playgrounds, Any Prouct or Anything made in America to entertain America, or Conncet America closer together, or make our lives a touch easier, nake access to things that we enjoy here in America a bit easier, and blame all of this on College Students alone. I don`t think we actually care how jaded ANYBODY gets.

    Cont'd on my next post.

    - Dwight

  • @rrhynes

    Cont'd from my last post.

    All of these things, but and we keep forgetting about these CONservatives that a number of us elect into Congress (based on their good looks) who are SO Selfish, they will only consume money for themselves ... for nothing, and expect God to come down from heaven with BILLION$ of DOLLAR$ in his pocket for us and when Dylan Ratigan OR MSNBC takes Our Politicians to task on this REGARDLESS of Their Party, they fold, & MSNBC is treated like the bully.

    - Dwight

  • @djthereplay MSNBC is a bully. They show Chris Matthews droning on about Obama and his ascent to to the Presidency, as if it's a symbol of good old fashion elbow grease and determination. Ridiculous. He insults his audience on a daily basis with his profound love of the political process, without regard to substance. Rachel Maddow is another one who poses in front of the Hoover Dam and reminisces about how great we were for building it.....of course, forgetting, no OSHA,UNion, EPA, etc. A joke.

  • @rrhynes

    Well, You try to talk sensibly about the issues to a Fox News Personality, it's just another script for a joke reply. BTW, Hoover Dam is an example of Americans coming together to do something constructive and positive here. Yes, I like MSNBC, because MSNBC speaks against the financial greed and political selfishness in this country (with a loose tung at times) in their political news shows, and Most CONservatives can`t stand it .

    Cont'd on my next post.

    - Dwight

  • @rrhynes

    Cont'd from my last post.

    MSNBC Speaks against all of this Financial Greed and Political Selfishness, and FOX News speaks , and jokes FOR Financial Greed and Political Selfishness. Bullying is John Stossel of FOX News doing a documentary basically calling EVERYBODY and EVERY CITIZEN, and EVERY BUSINESS THAT SERVES US CITIZENS in this COUNTRY who needs money to keep themselves afloat a bunch of FREELOADERS, entitled ... FREELOADERS!

    Cont'd on my next post.

    - Dwight

  • @djthereplay Do you or do you not agree that MSNBC is just as biased, just as full of shit and just as self-serving as FOX?

  • @rrhynes

    MSNBC may be biased, but Unlike FOX News, MSNBC almost ALWAYS talks shit with a purpose that benefits someone BEYOND themselves. MSNBC speaks for a Government who Financially Feeds Their Citizens whom the bribe the votes and money out of EVERY Presidential and Congressional Election Year.

    A Self Serving FOX News NEVER does that .

    Cont'd on my next post.

    - Dwight

  • @rrhynes

    Cont'd from my last post.

    Unfortunatly ..... The Political Talk in this country has become SO evil, that Some Politicians are forced under The CONServative Politicians Spell of Financially Neglecting Us American Citizens whom they bribe EVERY Election Cycle.

    - Dwight

  • @djthereplay And the "working class" , whomever that is, are suckered into believe that the gravy train is still running on the tracks. MSNBC stokes the engine and these idiots jump on board. For some odd reason, they think we're going to go back to how things were in the 1950's and 1960's. Wrong.

  • @rrhynes

    Well, The CONservative Republican Politicians/ FOX News Crowd think that separating Us American Citizens from Our American Government in Washington, D.C. who owns the ONLY money printing and pressing factory in this country is gonna bring America back to prosperity, then I have news for you. That greedy attitude is gonna actually end up getting us separated as being 50 States, One Unit, The United States of America.

    Cont`d on my next post.

    - Dwight

  • @rrhynes

    Cont'd from my last post.

    if The CONservative Republican Politicians/ FOX News Crowd think that Blind Super Spiritual Faith without physical actions of sharing and kindness, and TRUE PUBLIC SERVICE is gonna save America, and Bring America back to prosperity, I have news for you. It's only a path not only towards separation of our 50 State Union as the United States of America, but this will also put us on the road to neglection, hunger, and extinction, etc.

    - Dwight

  • @djthereplay The road to hell is littered with good intentions. ...or something like that. I agree with you, but most political liberals are rich people that have never personally done shit for anyone.

  • @rrhynes

    Prove it .

    - Dwight

  • @djthereplay LOL. You must be kidding. With all the time spent bullshitting people and trying to get reelected. There isn't time for much else. You certainly do not live in the same world I do or your perception is seriously skewed.

  • @rrhynes

    That depends on what kind of world you live in. I don`t think my views are skewed.

    There is some time for Obama to get at least something done ..... If he will quit being Mr. Make a proposal, and give Congress their space. NO MORE MR. NICE GUY. MR. NICE GUY Resourceful President is not gonna get it. It's making a proposal and staying on some tails until it's done.

    - Dwight

  • @djthereplay So you want an Autocrat and not a President.

  • Comment removed

  • @rrhynes

    The thing is that I want a Fighting, Ungreedy, True Public Serving Liberal Democrat for a President, and Not a Super Spiritual, Self Appointed, Bribing, Screwball CONservative Republican for a President .

    - Dwight

  • @djthereplay Strike the word DEmocrat and LIberal from your previous statement and look for that individual. Your partisanship and prejudice will never be allow you to choose the correct candidate, even he or she was running. Ron Paul is the closest candidate to what you've described,but I'm sure you'll find reasons to not vote for him.

  • @rrhynes

    Ron Paul is a Self Appointed Scammer who wants to justify separating the government from financially caring for their people. Sorry, I don`t vote for CON Artists like Ron Paul. In Fact, If these CON Artists like Ron Paul want ANY KIND of a favor from me outside of " being told to stop bribing me ", they will AT LEAST put a REAL SHORT LEASH on the mouths their Super Spiritual Special Intrest Groups.

    Cont'd on my next post.

    - Dwight

  • @djthereplay lol. YOu're hilarious. So who would you vote for? Ted Kennedy?

  • @rrhynes

    You' re right on the money I`d vote for Ted Kennedy .... if he were alive today, and was a choice.

    He and His family gave the disabled like me, a fighting chance of living Our American Dreams.

    He has done MORE for me in my lifetime, than a NUMBER of CONservative Republican Politicians

    EVER have. Yes, I wish Ted was alive today, and he was running. I`d be MORE than honored to vote for him.

    - Dwight

  • @rrhynes

    Cont`d from my last post.

    Ron Paul and these CONservative Repubicans better tell their Special Intrest Group (America Family Association) to STOP THEIR SUPER SPIRITUAL MESS ! Really, They aren`t the only ones. Much more Broadly, These CONservative Republican Politicians better cut this crap about SPENDING CUTS, and start financially caring for the citizens they bribe every year. And STOP WASTING OUR TROOPS LIVES OVERSEAS FOR HOLY WARS FOR NOTHING ! I`m not having it.

    -Dwight

  • @djthereplay Ron Paul wants all the wars to end today! He's

  • @rrhynes

    Prove it. Prove to me that he wants that.

    - Dwight

  • @djthereplay He says it all the time! Watch his speeches on the House floor or the candidate debates. He's one of the few that knows that war is a scam for the profitable war machine and says it out loud. They laugh at him, but that's because they're scared. If people start to embrace his ideas, those of the Constitution, the majority of politicians know it's over for them.

  • @rrhynes

    Which One? Our Nation's Constitution that CONS like Ron Paul Twist every time to separate government from their people? Ron Paul is one of those that are against anything involving government financially caring for the citizens that they bribe. And when someone catches these CONS in that mess and takes these CONS to task, these CONS try to dance their way out of it like it doesn`t matter to them.

    - Dwight

  • @djthereplay Do you think that a president should have any concerns, other than welfare , social security, medicare or medicaid?

  • @rrhynes

    Yes i do, The President should ALSO have concerns for Affordable and effective quality and access for our nation's educational system(s), proper protection of our country and her people, affordable health care for America's Citizens, make sure American Corporations excercise safe, fair, and uninvasive business practices.

    Cont`d on my next post.

    - Dwight

  • @rrhynes

    Cont`d from my last post.

    On the other hand .... Do you think that a president or anyone else that we elect into any and every other branch in authority of our nation should only be concerned about their OWN prosperity only?

    - Dwight

  • @djthereplay Do you vote?

  • @rrhynes

    Yes I vote.

    - Dwight

  • @djthereplay I can't imagine for whom. With your ideals, nobody exists that could live up to them.

  • @rrhynes

    I know who can live up to them ... a person with an open heart to financially and effectivly serve his or her citizens.

    - Dwight

  • @djthereplay And who is this altruistic soul you speak of?

  • @rrhynes

    Take a WILD Guess. He's in the White House ... like, right now,

    And The CONservative Republican Politicians in Congress have not been wanting him to really do much of anything, but just be a stick figure in the White House ..... unless President Obama Or ANY President who has a (D) next to their name gives these CONS what they want.

    - Dwight

  • @djthereplay Congratulations. You wanted hope, change , transparency and a degree of altruism. You got none of it. Are/were you suprised. Did you really think a man put inot place by a Chicago political machine was going to be different? Why did you think so? Your first clue should have been his education background. Yale? Harvard? Columbia? Please. These institutions do not produce real leaders, they produce salesman.

  • @rrhynes

    Maybe this is because TOO Many CONServative Republican Politicians don`t want to give whatever President Obama puts together the light of day. BTW, What do Yale, Harvard, and Columbia all have in common? They're all Universities. I'd like to see someone from Yale, or Columbia, or Harvard find you talking like this, and watch them educating you.

    - Dwight

  • @djthereplay Oh sure. Blame the conservatives. The liberals have absolutely nothing to do with the mess we're in. Don't you see that it's two sides of the same coin. You can play heads or tails, but the denomination never changes. I am educated, I'm an engineer. I believe what I can prove or touch. Those institutions of higher learning are more about indoctrination than education. A degree in law or social studies is a degree in nothing.

  • @rrhynes

    If these Institutions of Higher learning are all about indoctrination vs. education, Why do a number of businesses in this country look more at hiring college or university graduates to fill a number their job positions within them? Because they were properly trained up and educated and more prepared for most of the job(s) that most businesses in this country have within them by the graduate's respective college or university. I don`t call that a " degree in nothing ".

    - Dwight

  • @djthereplay Because those businesses are selling something, just like the schools. People don't go to Harvard or Yale for abetter education.They go because they hope and pray that ridiculous tab they're going to run up is going to guaranatee them a high paying job. Ever heard of Alumni? They don't teach students anything diferent than anyone else teaches.Statistics show that grads from upper echelon schools don't necessarily fair any better than other grads.

  • @rrhynes

    At least a number of those alumni end up getting a high paying job.

    And the rediculous tab is because some politicians in our government`s hearts are not with bettering the quality, and making affordable access to education. BTW, Thank the Greedy, Financially Self Consuming Attitudes of a number of the CONServative Republican Politicians for that higher tuition that has to be paid for a chance at a higher education.

    - Dwight

    -

  • @djthereplay Dude. You're out of your mind. Do you think conservatives set up all these bullshit loans for higher education? Do you also think the vast majority of these institutions are run by conservatives? Please. Get a reality check. It was the liberals insistence on loans for higher education that drove the cost through the roof.

  • @rrhynes

    Yes, I believe the CONServatives set up that loan because of their financial neglect for funding education, and making access to better education materials more affordable.

    When The Liberals attempt to fix that mess, It's like talking to walls.

    Nobody else's hearts are willing to hear, open up to, and deal with .... In Congress.

    That's why nothing gets done .... IN CONGRESS.

    - Dwight

  • @djthereplay You're wrong. Do smoe research and find out the truth. It isn't a conspiracy so you won't have to look far. The liberals pushed the banks to raise the lending limits and you now you got hyper-inflation of tuitiion costs.........just like in the housing market. A real conservative would never loan a 20 year old 100k for two years of education when they know there wasn't a chance in hell of paying it back. Obama wnated to forgive college debt for public service. Crazy!

  • @rrhynes

    Maybe because Obama cares about public service.

    What's happening with the banks is more of a self caused wound. Banks are supposed to guard your money, not turn your money into their salary and spend it down, and then pass their debts on to other people, places, and things.

    - Dwight

  • @djthereplay So him playing favorites is something you want from a President? He said he was all for forgiving the debt in half the time for those entering public service, but only then. Come on. Get real man. Are you related to Chris Matthews? It isn't about the banks, it's about big colleges ripping off students and collecting tax payer backed loans. The college gets big money and the student gets stuck with the paper...for life and no way to pay it back. It's a ripoff.

  • @rrhynes

    If only materials were free, I`d see more of your point ... But they're not.

    The ripoff here is that Some Politicians financially care more for covering themselves only vs. Affordable and Better Quality Education for the youth of our nation. BTW, At least that paper leads to a good paying job for a number of people ultamitly, because They have recieved a form of job training as part of their schooling.

    - Dwight

  • @djthereplay These expensive schools love to claim their teachers have high credentials and "publish" on a regular basis. Do you think this is for the benefit of the students? It's a bunch of posers trying to con potential posers.

  • @rrhynes

    It has to be proven that all of those teachers are posers first . Prove it .

    - Dwight

  • @djthereplay it isn't tthe teachers that are posing, it's the administration. The advertising end of the education business.

  • @rrhynes

    Prove that the advertising end of the education business are totally posers.

    Prove it.

    - Dwight

  • @djthereplay You prove it to yourself and maybe you'll learn something in the process. Call up any Ivy League college and ask them how many classes you can expect to be instructed by their "published and tenured" professors. Not just one class in the semester, but the majority of the classes held in that subjec tof that semester. You'll be shocked, if you're even interested in finding out. They uses teachers assistants to take their places, most of the time.

  • @rrhynes

    Here's my proof. How come that a number of businesses in this country look more for college or university graduates to fill in their job positions? At least somebody is teaching them something .

    Majority of the other classes is just having to hear what you don`t want to hear to meet the criteria for graduation most of the time. That is unfortunatly part of School ..... in general in a way.

    - Dwight

  • @rrhynes

    Cont`d from my last post.

    Bullying is Sean Hannity treating the few Liberals that he lets on his show like Evil Rendition of Socialists.

    FOX News does that, then the Political Bullying Issue NEVER comes up ... until MSNBC Responds to it.

    Then, MSNBC is the bully for responding to that mess?

    Hey, Unfortunatly, This is 1st Ammendment Rights and Freedom in America Today, and FOX News and Most CONservative Politicians have made it this way.

    - Dwight

  • Ratigans clearly an idiot. I think that it the only qualification one needs to be an MSNBC anchor

  • i hate fox news.... bias motherfuckers and you can never fit a word in edge ways.

  • @u9p87 "Hate" is a pretty strong word for someone who just spent the time to watch this clip. You can't deny that the other news channels are biased too. Anyway, who says the press can't have opinions? It is the publics job to interpret and discern between fact and opinion. Grow up.

  • @NinthChoirBlue anyway, who says i cant have an opinion? ...... and i will be the judge on my maturity thank you very much.

  • i came here looking for funny conservative satire.

    ...i guess it doesn't exist.

  • @roidroid

    In some cases, no satire is required when the prospective target has already provided the entertainment. After all, how could Greg have possibly topped that?

  • @oxomaticman can you please link me to a RedEye segment that's funny?

  • @roidroid

    To you? No, i cannot. Because you have a preconcieved notion that all conservatives basically lack intellectual wit and creativity. Yes, there are those who consider themselves conservative that make blanket assumptions about everyone on the left too. They, like you, are simpletons. While many conservatives can appreciate the comedic and artistic works of liberals, there are many liberals (you know , the "open minded") who have ZERO tolerance for ANYTHING conservative. Ironic.

  • @oxomaticman Oh, I can tell you're not one of those conservatives who make blanket assumptions.

  • I watch both Fox and MSNBC, I switch from one to the other when one gets too trashy. It's a good rule to go by.

  • I am NOT a liberal but Greg Gutfield is a bona fide prick. I hope Dan Abrams kicks his sorry arse. I wanna see a celebrity death match at Wrestlemania 28 Abrams vs. Gutfield in a winner take all steel cage match. Fox needs to replace this loser w/someone who has class like Marla Maples the Donald's ex wife. That'll grab lots more viewers for RedEye's audience. So what if Gutfield had John Oates & other cool celebs on. He's an asshole!

  • Ratigan talks about the real issues and doesn't do it for ratings he does it because it matters. And this Gutfield guy is an idiot, making fun of a guy who is passionate about his country and the truth and comparing him to a zombie. Dont watch the news to be entertained (for all you idiots who apparently like this Gutfiend jerkoff), watch the news to be informed because you really do care about the state our country is in. Im not trying to be mean, just figure out what it means to be human being

  • @cfhammer8 Ratigan is an idiot.

  • Does anyone else think Dylan Ratigan looks like, and is just as crazy as, Mel Gibson?

  • well it was a YES or NO question........Why doesnt this mark retard just say YES OR NO!

  • @whywecantunite Just the idiot who thinks a magical space man controls the tides.

  • No one watches MESSNBC. GG is the man!

  • but dont forget, bill oreilly is the "crazy" one right......

  • Dildo Ratigan

  • Dylan is class. you all can suck his balls threw his draws.

  • Gutfeld is sooo good.  I love redeye.

  • @randomscience1 hes terrible, hes the biggest tool this show sucks. dylan ratigan is awesome and actually makes sense. but everyone on fox is a tool guffield is just a failed comedian who became a useful idiot for rupert murdoch and the rich

  • @randomscience1 Then you're a DUMBFUCK who sullies the word SCIENCE in your name. Oh wait, 'random science', I doubt you even understand biology, much less evolution.

  • @randomscience1 I accidentally flipped past Fox once and saw Redeye. The smug ignorance that just oozed out of the whole panel made me want to punch my TV.

  • I used to like Dylan. Now he gets on MSNBC and he becomes a jerkoff. The guy tries to answer his questions and he interrupts him over and over. Then at the end the guy says we do not support racism and Dylan goes off on him for answering his question? Then the guy leaves and he berates him further, WTF is wrong with Dyaln, does MSNBC really turn people into Jackasses?

  • @psunseri He only interrupts people when they are lying, giving the run-around, or stalling while thinking for a (bullshit) response. This is what any sensible person in media does and maybe he's a bit aggressive about it, but there's ZERO wrong about being an aggressive interviewer.

  • @electronicoffee Or he's asking rhetorical questions, kind of like Lawrence O'Donnell , and is just going for the setup.

  • @Repremender damn straight, dylan ratigan is one of the few people that sees through the political left right game and how its used to distract people from the real corrupt nature of both parties. Plus mark williams is a racist and this gutfeld fag shouldnt be criticising dylan ratigan for treating him as such, fox wouldnt be paying attention to a tea party type movement let alone sponsoring it if a republican was president

  • Dildo Ratigan goes from occasional accuracy and then goes into that MSNBC leftist bullshit. He is bascially a left-wing asshole!

  • Dylan rules! This guy is on at 4am and no one has ever heard of him.

  • Good job Gutfeld with the 3am timeslot. Gutfeld also rants, what a joke

  • @JCRF The difference? Gutfeld's show is self described as an "opinion show," secondly he's not interviewing people in the same sense that Dylan Ratigan is supposed to be.

  • Dylan Ratigan is the fockin man!

  • I love Dylan Ratigan.

  • lol red eye is a faggot, the guy didnt anser dylans question

  • @TheInfamousCanadian You have red eye because I nut on your face. Why don't you stay in the great white north and get the fuck out of the US?

  • Dylan Ratigan is Stupid.!! He need help. he is stupid. he need to think before he say that

  • Dylan Ratigan is Stupid.!! He need help.

  • I like Red Eye on Fox. Dylan Ratigan.. where the F do you come off with this hypothetical crap. Hey if people are saying they wanna kill blacks and jews....... who the F said that? Where are they?? And why doesnt Dylan Ratigan ask that question to every group leader. Ratigan is a jackass

  • This is spin, dude. You edited a crucial part of the conversation and now you want to make it sound like he wouldn't let him answer but actually he didn't answer his question, he danced around it. This is propaganda for sure.

  • this show airs at 3am where I live, and is entertainment

    you either get it or you don't

  • Notice how much the talking heads on Fox and MSNBC use one another for "content."

    BTW you can watch the fuckers on FOX pulling the same shit on people foolish enough to be "interviewed" by their talking monkey's too.

  • @urbanverificationist

    Considering the ratings I guess Fox must be a lot better at it. The mystery to me has always been why, if all the millions of people that hated Fox so much actually watched the other networks, why then is Fox beating all the other networks in ratings? And beating them badly. Gutfield's 3 am show often out draws Larry King's prime time slot. Some Fox evening shows will out draw MSNBC's entire combined evening lineup.

  • @no10standard

    I think Fox Spews may, on any given evening, draw a little over 3 million viewers. Conversely, on any given evening, the vast majority of Americans are not watching Fox Spews. This gives me hope.

  • @urbanverificationist

    Yeah, the rest are watching Dancing With The Stars, MTV's Cribs, or Punk My Ride or any other endlessly stupid reality shows or even worse "Anderson Cooper 360". I guess I am wrong about Anderson Cooper, nobody watches that, but they are watching a lot of crap. Independent surveys have found them to be the most balanced, so they report lies from the left almost as frequently as the rest of them. So what's your problem?

  • @no10standard

    I think we have too much "reality tv" and too little reality news.

  • @urbanverificationist

    If you mean "reality news" like MSNBC's Contessa Brewer calling an armed man at a tea party a racists, while editing the tape so we can't see that he is actually black, real news reporting... We might as well be watching Dancing With The Stars.

  • @no10standard

    No, I mean actual unfiltered, in the field as opposed to armchair, journalism.

  • @urbanverificationist

    Balanced reporting is such a subjective thing anymore. example; Obama refuses to put solar panels on top the White House. If Fox reports this story it will be judged as a negative story about Obama. However true it may be. The other side of the story is the WH press release... "Representatives from the White House met with the group to discuss President Obama's unprecedented commitment to renewable energy bla bla bla" ....

  • @urbanverificatio

    Fox will report both sides of the issue and explain that the WH press release didn't even mention the intent of the meeting, which was to put solar panels on top the WH. This will also be seen as a negative Obama story. Sometimes you just can't spin a story so that everyone looks good. To make this a positive story for the WH you would have to omit certain details that make people like you uncomfortable. Fox ain't going to do that. (source UK Guardian)

  • @urbanverificationist

    Public Policy Polling (PPP) is an American, Progressive, and Democratic Party-affiliated polling firm based in Raleigh, North Carolina. PPP was founded in 2001 by businessman and Democratic pollster Dean Debnam.... "Public Policy Polling nationwide survey of 1,151 registered voters Jan. 18-19 found that 49 percent of Americans trusted Fox News, 10 percentage points more than any other network." (source: POLITICO, PPP)

  • @no10standard

    Argumentum ad populum?

  • @urbanverificationist

    Tardus men postulo retineo explicatus.

  • Do u believe Dylan Ratigan is only 38 years old? That guy looks 50 :O acts like he's 3, tho lol.... What i found hil-fucking-larious was the 'if I was holding a Dylan Ratigan event' and I envision that man, all alone, in a room full of stuffed animals.... just screaming at them

  • This is called news? Ratigan is such a loser. Grow up and become a real journalist, and not a constipated spin doctor. "Do I run NBC?" Rattigan asks, but the cam keeps rolling. Obviously he doesn't have as much authority as he'd like to think. Why censor news? Let the guy answer the question please. Informed citizens don't need your screaming bias. We can make informed decisions on our own. Whatever happened to real journalism (i.e. Larry King/Anderson Cooper)?

  • Man, Fox News is running scared. MSNBC hosts such as Dylan are on fire highlighting the stupidity of Republicans and racists.

  • are you kidding dylan ratigan is for the people. all the rest are trying to sell us bullshit, right v. left bullshit.

  • The was a prime example of how jews railroad people when they come on far left shows, same as they are doing to Dr. Tony Martin.

    Ma'at

  • Williams WASN'T trying to answer the question, he was trying to spin the issue into a story that reflects poorly on NBC, which had nothing to do with Ratigan's question about racist teabaggers. We need more people like Ratigan in the media, who will hold guests' feet to the fire and force them to answer the question rather than reciting talking points.

  • @eunicron There are plenty of absolute douche-bags like ratigan and they're on MSNBC and they all together get about as many viewers as Red Eye does at 3am

  • No not really........ he was trying to get an answer and not a talking point.... I love that about Dyllan.... He can smell a talking point from a mile away and he doesn't allow it on his show...

  • Ratigan was actually right on this one. I don't think that Ratigan is wrong to demand a general yes/no responsive answer. His question was well-phrased, and the Tea Party hijacker (since the Tea Party has no leaders) tried to give a nonresponsive response.

  • I am offended by Dylan Ratigan. He should go back to CNBC and his cheerleading of worthless stocks like FNM and FRE.

  • RATIGAN is the man

  • Who watches this show? These clowns are not funny... they just make stupid, lame comments and then laugh at their own jokes. Obviously, when you can't report news at Fox "news", you can't do comedy, either.

  • 'til my eyeballs POP out and roll across the floor!!  Classic Gregalogue...keep up the great work Greg

  • watched this red eye show one late night didnt laugh one bit

  • Ratigan apologized to Congressman Wasserman-Schultz for conducting a "rude" interview. Has he apologized to Mark Williams yet for being a raging ass?

  • Comment removed

  • @priesbrian are you retarded.. dylan is a fiscal conservative.. do some research.

  • Comment removed

  • This Red Eye a-hole is a complete jerk. And not funny at all.

  • @bartonim

    I'd bet you don't even watch the show.

    You're head is probably the porty potty of Bill Maher's worn out, corny Leftist jokes.

  • @tacticomp I watch enough to know it's stacked with pricks like this dimwit.

  • I appreciate the way Ratigan has taken the Obama admin to talk for not properly regulating wallstreet, but this was just plain ridiculous. I'm sure all ten of his viewers were, like, "right on, Dylan!"

  • @seans10

    You're right, at the rate PMSNBC's dismal rating is tanking down the drain, there's probably only 20 viewers and 10 of those had cheered him.

  • Maybe the funniest thing is, after Ratigan said to cut off his mic they did not. We could hear Mr. Williams as he took off his mic.

  • Once again, liberals at MSNBC have exposed the far liberal left for exactly what they accuse the far right of being, hypocrites. I would like to, before I am accused of being a right-wing nut, state that I am an independent & voted for Obama. (I have since regretted that decision) The tea party is a noble movement of concerned Americans standing up for their constitutional rights & for this man to slander & blatantly disrespect them just because he disagrees with them is worse than Rush Limbaugh

  • RATigan, what a psycho, Nothing but another Tabloid show. Just stick with "To Catch a Predator" or Prison Lockup documentaries, they obviously get better ratings than this piece of CRAP.

  • What an idiot. Makes me glad I don't have cable TV. I'd hate to even stumble across something like msnbc while channel surfing.

  • @Miatacrosser They did the same thing to Peter Shiff but it lasted for a few minutes. Go look it up.

  • @Miatacrosser

    So you watch cable news on Youtube?

  • Dylan, do you support the commies and socialist in the democratic party?

    I hold you personally responsible.

    HAHA.

    Dylan is blaming this guy for a "MAYBE" few nuts?

  • I watched this on tv, Boy was i pissed off. Typical Angry far left un-American bigot.

    Granted williams should've just said no we don't. But at the point where he's trying to answer, he can't because of RATigans yelling and over- talking!

    Desperate far-left wack's like this are on the racist kick again...Why doesn't Ratman show the supposed KKK and other racist @ the tea parties... Where's the video proof..I'm a fox junkie and i watch msnbc all the time, i just don't see them @ rallies.

  • Unbelievable, this guy is a complete buffoon. I have never seen his show but comedy like this should not be missed especially when you are actually laughing at the host. MY, my, my how far the progressive media has fallen.

  • If not for YouTube, I wouldn't know MSNBC existed... pathetic...

  • There was a Dylan Ratigan event, no one showed up, not even Dylan Ratigan.

    More people saw the Dylan Ratigan clip on YouTube, as a part of a RedEye clip, than when it was originally shown on MSNBC.

  • Ratigan made a fool of himself. If he thinks this kind of insane ranting, smearing, and bullying is helpful to his leftist cause, he should rethink his position.

    He is showing the American people the ugly face of the far left. Do we really want to have people like this overseeing every aspect of our lives? Or should we fight to keep govt's power limited?

    The Tea Partiers want FREEDOM - nothing racist about that. I've been to many Tea Party events and people of all races were warmly welcomed.

  • @caraclaudel Well, O'Reilly has done this hundreds of times on his show, as has Sean Hannity. Where is your outrage?

  • @masudrules, O'Reilly or Hannity can't hold a candle to Dylan Ratigan when it comes to ranting, smearing and not letting the person they're interviewing get a word in edgewise, and their ratings support that. Plenty of independents and Democrats tune in to Fox News. No one tunes in to Ratigan.

    Another difference is that the right doesn't want to control every aspect of your life. We want freedom. The left wants to enslave us to the state, where we'll be at the mercy of leftists like Ratigan.

  • @caraclaudel Actually, both Hannity and O'Reilly are worse, anybody who's watched any of these shows knows that; O'Reilly has cut people's mics and smeared them many times.

    And ratings don't actually mean that much. Sponge Bob gets higher ratings than O'Reilly, does that mean he's more reliable than him? (well, actually sometimes I think he is)

    That's not true, some on the right (neocons) DO want to control every aspect of people's lives (e.g. wiretapping)

    And freedom is a very vague term...

  • @masudrules, freedom is not a "very vague" term. It's not absolute and there are degrees of freedom, but anyone who risked their life fleeing Cuba to come to the US understands the difference. It means the right to live as we see fit, to pursue the activities we choose, and interact with others as we want, as long as we're not harming them. It means we have the right to trade goods and services with others and benefit from those transactions. It means we (not the govt) make our decisions.

  • @caraclaudel Sure, I can agree with that, as long as it's attuned by social justice and equality. (let me guess, you're now going to yell "SOCIALIST")

  • @masudrules, social justice is the modern day term for communism, and we have a century's worth of mass murder, impoverishment, and slavery to the state to see how well that turned out.

    People die trying to flee places that offer imposed "social justice" to get to places that offer freedom. No American gets on an inner tube and risks their lives trying to get to Cuba, but many Cubans have died trying to get here. Why? There is "social justice" in Cuba. It is a prison state.

  • @caraclaudel .. yeah.. do some research before you start smearing people for being "leftists"... Ratigan is not one. He's been very critical of the Obama administration scumbags.

  • It has become quite funny and entertaining to witness the demise of MSLSD as their hosts grow increasingly nuts. It makes absolutely no sense why NBC lets these wack jobs continue down the road to irrelevancy and microscopic ratings, which means losing money, and not change the way they are doing things. It is perfectly analogous to what is happening to the democrat party right now. Dems continue to push ever harder for an insane agenda that is leading to their own destruction. Keep it up, Boys!

  • sounds like the republicans. democrats and republicans= no change no hope nothing. The only one in the crew that could MAYBE help America is Ron Paul and no one knows who he is and there is no way in hell he could get support from the republicans who have created everything he wants changed.

    I dont live in America but I understand the idea of the tea party but I hope they realize its going to take a revolution to have change, not hope in politicians ALL corporate influenced.

  • @cancanbiker

    Thanks but no thanks for this Canadian native's, (which country is the bastion of loony liberalism and the epitome of Socialism), pontification on America's geo politics.

    You should have made some efforts to resist what the loony Left had done in destroying your country a long time ago. Which is essentially what we're doing today.