Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (68)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I Believe This Was A Video Clip Of PBS-TV's PBS Newshour's Report On "People Need To Question This Buzzword "Terrorist" And How It's Being Used" On Thursday Evening, September 1, 2011.

  • I’m stunned how unbiased & unsensational this report is.

  • "Any person or group who uses violence to promote a political or religious agenda" -- That all depends on what sort of things we are willing to call 'violence', of course. If your generation is destroying the environment, are they committing violence to future generations of human beings? If so, then the definition is moot. Both sides see each other as terrorists.

  • Anyone who criticizes our business or industry needs to be shouted down. If they act on their bullshit, we must imprison them for life. No argument, no trial.

    Anyone defending the environment will be locked up forever.

  • If your an eco green faggot , Go live under a tree because guess what your house structure contains wood and nearly everything you use and wear contains plastic , processed from burnt petrol which is also not good for the environment.

    So go live under a tree and dont use anything artificial.

  • "Any person or group who uses violence to promote a political or religious agenda". Sounds like a reasonable definition to me.

  • I have to think, if your intent is to terrorize (without loss of life), then you are a terrorist....that simple, simple semantics. The effects of non-lethal terrorism are damaging as well, in fact it can be argued that it could shorten the lifes of recipients. They are wrong! If they seek change, do it without terrorizing others.

    Sooner or later, they are gonna make mistake, and get people killed..they are playing with FIRE!

  • Why don't you buy some forest land and preserve it? Oh wait, because either the Fed owns it.

  • So they call the first responders terrorists and only question the term when it comes to an environmentalist with the intent to literally terrorize a company. I kind of think of what this guy did was terrorism, but legally, it should just be arson and conspiracy, no terrorist attachment.

  • harvest hemp instead of trees hemp would solve alot of problems these days but of course the government is standing in the way of its people and wont let them grow what ever plants they want because they want us to use their products their medicine their papers and their oil fuck em what comes around goes around.

  • If his intent was to create fear, I don't think it worked.

  • america has become so much like fascist era Germany.

  • @skywolf8113 So a guy does something that is the exact definition of terrorism, even if not, still arson. And America is fascist now? Seriously?!

  • @skywolf8113

    I can see it coming to that yea, i see the hate and the relationship between middleeastern people and "terrorists" For a lot of people those two groups are one in the same and are veiwed with that prejeduce .

  • Let's be honest here: the ELF's intent was to terrorize. And to me at least, that makes this an act of terrorism. You could argue the lumber companies are terrorists, I'm sure some would, but an eye for an eye, I mean...afterwards you don't go saying "Oh well I'm a nose" right?? It doesn't matter if people were killed or not.

    I have not given thought to whether the intent to terrorize and further deter should affect his sentencing; I'm just saying this can't not be called terrorism.

  • The whole video I was thinking Arson, Breaking & Entering, Trespassing, but at no time did it spell Terrorism...why?! Because just like they said, there IS no legal definition of terrorism! Sheeple gotta wake up, man!

  • 4:33 Is that a stockpile foto of a concentration camp from WW2?

  • @leechmasterb That's a photo of the brand new American concentration camp.

  • Let's see, you burned down places with the intent on creating fear towards a certain creation of industry. Hmm, that seems like the exact definition of terrorism, asshole. You are a terrorist, you fucking idiot. It's not like you were a normal person with an ideology who only used non-coercive words to argue your ideology. YOU BURNED DOWN FUCKING BUILDINGS!!!

  • Isn't a terrorist someone with the intent to terrorize or create fear?

  • @manmadesounds So that homeless dude that chills on the street corner screaming at people is a terrorist?

  • @PyROphantasie If he does it on purpose and you become fearful? Then yes, technically he is a terrorist.

  • We don't have criminals or crimes in the US anymore. We have Loan Terrorist and terrorist.

    P.S. This guy is not a terrorist but he is an Arsonist fighting to protect trees and has an all wooden kitchen. haha 0:48

    Give his ass 20 years just for being stupid!!!

  • This is exactly what ManBearPig wants

  • Terrorist is just a word, one I wish I'd never heard

    When? it's used to vilify, without the need to question why

    Only fools would swift condemn, that which has not befallen them

    Until you know what lies behind, the actions of a tortured mind

    Thank your God for sparing you, the suffering others have lived through

    Where are the cries of just demand, for Arabs driven from their land?

    Blame the victim, turn the cheek, praise the bully, kick the weak!

    Keep on running, karma's coming!?

  • I think the act of KILLING people is essential for it to be called "Terrorism"

    IMO.

  • ..and 8000 missiles bombing Libya is humanitarian assistance. How 1984 can it get?

  • Liberal terrorism? Well I guess they've covered just about everyone now. You're ALL terrorists.

  • If they were the KLF, they would Rock You!

  • Don't worry about the environment it will take care of us....Literally.

  • E.L.F. ... seriously?

    This flew under my radar.

    Why have I never heard of this?

  • @grizzzlyjoe Seriously? They've been around for decades. Mostly harmless, with a few outliers, IMO.

  • @grizzzlyjoe Because they may burn down some buildings from time to time, but they go out of their way to make sure no one gets hurt. They aren't worth being on anyone's radar.

  • An "Eco-Terrorist" would be a logging company, the military, BP and Exxon, Michelle Bachman who wants to drill the Everglades, the Bush White House who starts a war in Afghanistan in order to set up an oil pipeline through it.

    In that view, this guy would logically and properly be called a "Freedom Fighter" like George Washington and others who fight to throw off a rich and powerful imperial oppressor.

  • I really think that arson for political & social change against anything private is terrorism. Yes, worse acts of terrorism have been committed, but that doesn't mean thats not what this is.

  • what a joke, i'm supposed to feel sorry for this guy?

  • Haha, so ironic that they are called "Eco terrorists", I don't blame lumber mills much but there are some companies that are actually true Eco terrorists and have poisoned the Earth quite possibly beyond hope of repair...but they get paid.

  • This isn't REGULAR news, Moxy.

    =)

  • The media are a bunch a bitch ass, sellout parrots..Give em a couple of bucks, and they will parrot anything constantly, terrorists,communists, socialists, and on and on, they are just basically fascists mouthpieces

  • All terrorism is politically based.

  • This is Ron Pauls fault! Ron Paul for so long, has committed acts of treason, terrorism and yes, America.. /RACISM/. Ron Paul advocates and SUPPORTS the mass cutting of tree's, he supports terrorists like Sadam Hussain, Gadaffi, or Al-Quaida's Osama Binladen. Oh yes, America.. It has been discovered that this traitorist racist unsophisticated minds call "Paul", is nothing but a hypocrite, one who funds Terrorism. Say "Ron Paul! I'm sick of your treason, and I'm voting Romney!" Romney 2012. :)

  • @2tur So your gonna call Ron Paul a racist & then say your going to vote for a man who was a member of an openly racist organization until 1979? How does that make sense. Isn't it you who is being hypocrite, by claiming to stand on an issue & then ignoring it. If you like Romney because of his Neocon(not meant derogatorily) stance, then say so. If you want somebody who has never been accused of racism (I say accused because the evidence against Paul is iffy at best), you need another candidate.

  • @2tur The other things you mentioned in the post suggest you merely like Neocon thinking. It seems you support green lawmaking, which is traditionally belongs with left wing ideals. Yet you also seem to support a very pro-war, good offense=good defense type foreign policy. Which is the only reason the Neocons left the democratic party. If you are a Neocon then Romney is definitely your candidate. I just wouldn't mention racism in any reason to vote for him, unless your a white supremacist.

  • I don't think "Terrorist" should ever be used in law, because it is not well defined enough to fit a variable degree of crimes. Terrorism - "The unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence by a person or an organized group against people or property with the intention of intimidating or coercing societies or governments, often for ideological or political reasons" how do you define "intention of intimidating"

  • They aren't muslim so they aren't terrorists. ... this is statement brought to you by a muslim...

  • The only terrorists are the ones in office waging wars and taking away rights, staging fake attacks, setting people up and hauling people off for profit. It's the government stupid!

  • @sethzky77 forgot to add that after they have people hauled off for profit the lease them out for practically slave labor to government contractors. They make things like bullet proof vests and wiring for missiles for private companies that have government contracts. The prisoners get paid a few dollars an hour for work that the citizen workforce was previously doing. Guess that's the plan to compete with China, toss everyone and prison and use them as slave labor lol.

  • @Mojo3192 agreed 10,0000% I think it's time for the domestic, "terrorists", to revolt and route out the true terrorists in D.C. and wall street. By their definition, the revolutionaries of the 1700's are, "Terrorists". Fuck that. The answer to 1984 is 1776!

  • @sethzky77 Close their called republicans and there buddies The Corporations!

  • @TheClosestranger00 It is not just Republicans , Democrats have there hand in it.

  • @TheClosestranger00 Yeah it's all the republicans fault that Obama and Pelosi had a filibuster proof congress but continued all of bush's worst policies.

    Join the October Pledge October2011 . o r g

    Or you can just continue fraudulent red vs blue lie

  • @russkeller Follow the money! The Democratic party is, in part just as guilty. BUT look at the extreme postions the so called red have taken, and thats just recently. simply cant compare. by the way it wasnt a filibuster proof Congress. A majority, yes. Do your homework.

  • @TheClosestranger00 So you'll just continue the 2&2 is 5 Dogma.... It's not that I don't do my homework, It's that I don't lie to myself to make myself feel better about the situation. If we can't be honest and identify the actual problems they can't be corrected.

  • @russkeller your reply says nothing but jibberish.So lets be Honest.

  • @TheClosestranger00 republicans, democrats, whatever.... they all got their greedy hands in the candy jar behind the scenes. It's like picking Hitler or Stalin. The whole shitbang is corrupt as fuck. It's time for a revolutionary cleansing!

  • The terrorists are in Langley Virginia. And the eco terrorists are usually in mental hospitals. Eco terrorists are the worst terrorists, they want to kill people to save the grass and rats, no purpose at all. They were called terrorists way before the CIA contracted people to make Bin Laden videos.

  • "When people go home at night and worry". This would be exactly what SWAT and the US government do. Political terrorism. Then we have judicial terrorism, judges are some of the worst criminals we have.

  • @joebananatube "judicial terrorism..."

    Great quote, Ill probably be parroting this line for years_

  • @joebananatube Hilarious trolling bro

  • a. a person who employs terror or terrorism, esp as a political weapon. He is a terrorist, he admitted it we wanted to scare them in to changing their practices. Terror=scare not murder

  • a. a person who employs terror or terrorism, esp as a political weapon. He is a terrorist, he admitted it we wanted to scare them in to changing their practices. Terror=scare not murder

  • McVey was more than likely only a puppet pawn.

  • terrorist is a word used fear monger the public.

  • @jdocks777 And it works!

  • Stupid tree-hugging, left-wing hippies. Lock him up!

  • Stupid tree-hugging, left-wing hippies. Lock him up!

  • Stupid tree-hugging, left-wing hippies. Lock him up!

  • yes question this, yes, yes, yes!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more