Anchor Phil Hayton is an intelligence service (MI5?) operative ( been in all the war zones) serving as a media plant.
Proof Hayton's in on it!
/watch?v=BzMlFFQ2oqQ
Agents like him are used to disperse spin, propaganda and to suppress true accounts from leaking out to the public. Learn about Black Ops:: google COINTELPRO (counter intelligence / lies!), PSYOPS, PROPAGANDA,
. The CIA has people planted in the US media at CNN, TIME magazine etc. Google Operation Mockingbird.
This was a communication error in the midst off panic in news coverage, the bbc were told the towers collapse was 'imminent' the message that the building had fallen spread quikly, leading to a news break half an hour erly
This was a communication error in the midst off panic in news coverage, the bbc were told the towers collapse was 'imminent' the message that the building had fallen spread quikly, leading to a news break half an hour erly
No he's not. Obama's is managed by the same people who managed Bush, who managed Clinton, etc. The New World Order is being quickly implemented. Global feudalism is on its way.
I know how much you hate youtube because they're not trying anymore, the copyright claims, you prefer live video, that's alright (considering that google ruined yt)
I find it difficult to believe that the BBC would be stupid enough to decide to falsely tell the nation a building had collapsed, and then choose to place a camera in front of a window with such a wonderful view of said building from which to report it. Conspiracy theories are so irritating...
Of course someone knew. But they would not say anything would they? The US government knew what was going on and pretended they didnt. I think the conspiricy theorists may be right this time.
OMG what an idiot...if ya read the writing at the bottom of the screen as she's talking, its saying a building by the trade centers has collapsed, not one of the trade centers. fucking dipshit. if ya gonna run ur mouth about something like this, at least make sure its correct, or be smart enough to read to writing at the bottom of the screen.
Intoxictiongirl: ( Rolling my eyes) It says on the screen: "The 47 story Soloman Brother's Building close to the World Trade Centre has also collapsed." Newsflash: The Soloman Brothers Building IS WTC 7, the exact building they are prematurely reporting as collapsed.
Nobody was standing near the buildings. They take second hand information and report. Collapse could also mean severe structural failure or partly demolished by plane impact (debris).
How is this proof of anything... the video behind her may not have been real time, plus there is no time stamp on the video so we can't see what time it was when that was being broadcast! We have to take your word for it!
This is so absurd. A british journalist names the wrong building. A journalists reads it or gets it wrong and thats proof of some inside job! Talk about clutching for straws!
you really are a fucking idiot yea its wrong reporting a building thats collapsed thats still standing i dont think she mistoke it for the world tradecentre do you what else could it be then? answer is nothing then a third building actually collapsed and it was the one she imagined already collapsed whats the odds on that then you fucking dumbass yours sincerly will.
yeah what a conincedence? lost connection... claiming its collasped people wake up you cant find a pair of accomadating boots after you step in this shit...
This is nothing more than a time zone issue. This broadcast appeared on the BBC 10pm news which is why they claim it is only 5pm EST in New York. In the month of September NY is still on spring time (spring forward/fall back) which means London is only 4 hours ahead of NY and will remain that way until November when daylight savings begins.
This was a very poor decision by the news producer to play a tape delay video that still clearly showed building 7 standing in the background--nothing more.
No, not spot on. Because the official BBC response doesn't mention timezones. It simply states that the reporter was just saying what she was told, the wrong information, or EARLY information in this case.
@smartbet Ah interesting. If this is the case why didn't the head of the BBC put this reason forward when questioned about this video? He didn't because your talking rubbish! Reporter Jane Standley was on a live feed directly from NYC, they messed up face it!
9/11 was an inside job, its not well known because the real traitors who commited the attack of 9/11 are so powerful they own the mainstream western media, they're all owned by 5 war profiteering government backed companies. They're all singing from the same song sheet & earning a LOT of money for their loyalty. People today are very stupid trusting anything the papers tell them.
This video has been debunked repeatedly and now I must debunk it again for you. The reporter is standing in front of a blue screen playing a tape delay recording on it. At the beginning of the news cast you can clearly see the vertical white line that is the edge of the screen on the far left of the video. On the left of that white line you can catch a glimpse of a live shot of NY city as it actually looks at this point in time. Do you see the dark building with smoke going over it??
How have you debunked anything? We are talking about the chronology here... How does obvious observational comments debunk the chronology of events that happened? I want to hear you out but you need to make sense....
News are supposed to be organised, yet they let such a simple and dumb mistake take place?. And yes, i know it was a inside job. Good excuse to invade the middle east and steal some oil, don't you aggree?
does it make a difference? the building was still standing, yet he said it fell.
or maybe.. the skyline behind the female reporter was superimposed behind her, with video of it still standing put in instead of the completely fallen 7 building! 0MGZ. UB3R D3BUnK@GE!!
anyone who has to say this is a fake needs to do much more research. bbc said the origanal tapes have gone missing and also their sister new team news 24 cant find their tapes either. brain working yet
The mass media is owned and controlled by four major corporations! So this is clearly a good example of the lies and propaganda that is sold to the American public!
Unfortunate happinstance of the concern of the morning, Who could say if they were there, the last thing you wanted to be in would be a large building,
Thats just common sense, But those controlled implosions you cant spim that.
PLEASE DONT READ THIS. YOU WILL GET KISSED ON THE NEAREST POSSIBLE FRIDAY BY THE LOVE OF YOUR LIFE. TOMORROW WILL BE THE BEST DAY OF YOUR LIFE. HOWEVER IF YOU DONT POST THIS COMMENT TO AT LEAST 3 VIDEOS YOU WILL DIE WITHIN 2 DAYS. NOW UV STARTED READIN DIS DUNT STOP THIS IS SO SCARY. xSEND THIS OVER TO 5 VIDEOS IN 143 MINUTES WHEN UR DONE PRESS F6 AND UR CRUSHES NAME WILL APPEAR ON THE SCREEN IN BIG LETTERS. THIS IS SO SCARY CAUSE IT ACTUALLY WORKS
help me out here, i dont know which towers which, i know the 2nd one hit collapsed first, is that the one shes talking about? or was she talking about the north tower?...i appologise for my seemingly ignorant amount of knowledge, but being only 15 when it happened and living in a different country at the time didnt help :) x
They are talking about WTC building 7. A building, despite initial reports the first couple of days had fallen, most people on the whole including Americans didn't seem to be aware had even fallen until a few months ago.
Well, since it was widely known that the building would probably collapse, the BBC reporter evidently got confused and thought it had already fallen. Lots of reporting errors that day.
BTW, the BBC also reported Saddam Hussein's death early by 1 hour. Conspiracy?
"How can anyone possibly be confused about whether or not a building has collapsed or not?"
Because they didn't know which bldg was WTC 7 & were relying on info from others. Lots & lots of confusion that day. There were reports of bombs in the NY Stock Exchange & bombs in the US Capitol. The UN Bldg was evacuated based on wrong information. It was a crisis, remember?
Wow. What else can one say? Oh wait, I got it. If a person was standing over a dead guy with a bloody knife, I suppose you'd tell us he "probably" just got done hacking a chickens head off for dinner. Poor hungry guy.
People who say this is just a "misunderstanding or a bad lead" guess what? It's still a smoking gun because you can't get a PROPHETIC news lead. News leads tell you WHAT happened not what's going to happen unless you're talking about something A)Weather related or B)ALREADY PLANNED
President Bush: "He told us the operatives have been instructed to insure the explosives went off at a high point that was high enough to prevent people trapped above from escaping". (Youtube 9/11 Coincidences - Part 12)
What has happened here is that a live feed has been temporarily interrupted by a recorded color commentary during the frantic broadcast of the 911 tragedy. This happens frequently during major events in which multiple feeds are being sent into the station in no specific order.
Despite over 5 years of searching, the conspiracy nuts haven't found a single structural engineer on the entire planet who believes that crackpot nonsense about any or all of the WTC skyscrapers being destroyed by explosives. That's because anyone with relevant expertise can recognize that controlled demolition nonsense as... nonsense.
Only a "crackpot" would believe the fairy tale official story. You've got to be kidding me if you think that damage to those buildings caused them to fall into imprints of themselves.
Close to a thousand structural engineers who have figured out that the towers came down via controlled demolitions (falling at freefall speed into their own footprint, and damning forensic evidence of thermate, a controlled demolition cutter charge, was found in the dust of the towers). These experts are calling for a new, independent investigation. See " Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth" ae911truth(dot)org Watch Loose Change 2E on google.
@ninjachick13 thankyou, someone who knows what they're talking about whos done 'research'. Most people don't see it because they're stupid enough to believe the most powerful war economy on the planet wouldn't own all of its countries news companies & more.
If you watch the clip, you'll see to the immediate left of the "window" behind the reporter is the edge of what appears to be another window. If that were a real window behind her, the image to the left of it would have to be another real window, showing the SAME skyline. But the window at the left shows an entirely different skyline, with different buidings, different lighting, and smoke drifting in a different direction. Ergo, you aren't looking at real windows, it's video.
The conspiracy nuts apparently think the reporter is standing in front of a real window. She's not, of course, any more than David Letterman does his show before a real window overlooking NYC. She's standing in front of a ChromaKey screen, showing previously recorded footage.
The BBC did not air that report before 7 WTC collapsed. They aired it afterward.
That's why there was no uproar about it 5-1/2 years ago. The BBC is widely rebroadcast in the USA. If they'd actually announced the collapse of 7 WTC before it happened, many people would have noticed at the time.
It wasn't a conspiracy. Just a mis understanding. She says that the WTC is burning(wtc7)and then she talks about how the WTC has collapsed. At that point she was no longer talking about WTC7. She was talking about the towers.
Honestly I dont know how you can think that a conspiracy would ever work if the reporters, news staff etc..were all in on it. This is a bullshit video.
1 hour before building 7 was "pulled" we all knew at home what was happening.The american media reported the controlled implosion to the public in order to clear the area and to stop even more hysteria. I do believe that 9/11 was a conspiracy, but this video is taking it too far. The BBC is foreign, do not fault them. This video is a waste of your time.
If the BBC was involved in some sort of mass conspiracy, do you really think they'd be that f***ing stupid to say it had collapsed and then stick a news reporter right in front of it?
Alert: PoetryHound is a shill/Agent provocateur/filibuster/spin doctor/smear merchant/"debunker." He spends an enormous amount of time going from 9/11 video to video on YouTube posting his comments "debunking" 9/11. Regardless of what evidence you provide, he refutes it as "evidence" and continues to regurgitate the "official" story as "fact."
your just here to divide the people who stand for truth you are not on the side of the people who care and want the deaths avenged----and saying cnn and firefighters knew proves nothing except that it was rigged in advance--so youve proved my point--and how did they know--answer that--you havent made an attempt to--lets hear it- Esnir
there is no argument here...all those who try to spin this are simply government paid debunkers...my suggestion is to ignore them and correspond with those who stand for truth
the battle lines are being drawn and you are not on the side of the american people or have them in your best interest with a stupid quote like that---if i was there and lived it and heard people talking in advance of this i would have shot them---because i would have known who was behind it right away
-living a lie is in style nowadays--reporting on a vote and predicting an unpredictable building collapse are not the same--you have no arguement anymore--for the sake of the people who've died stop trying to divert the people who actually cares attention---to absolutely nothing--we now know and theres nothing you can say from here on out
clackbleep, thomasanderson99 is right. and besides your asking us to grow up with all the mistakes and errors in your comment and just your stupid name CLACKBLEEP? CLACKBLEEP?! how dumb is that?! your a naive little boy that will never understand the concept of this entire thing and i only wish you could live till year 4000 when it'll finally be proven that bush made 9/11 happen so he would have an excuse to have the iraq war.
It is astonishing that the BBC not only chose the correct building (WTC7), they also correctly described the cause of the collapse in line with the official version of events. The WTC7 building was situated around 300 metres from the twin towers. No steel framed building in the history of mankind had ever collapsed as a result of a fire, and yet on 11/9/2001, we had 3 collapse in one day, all as a result of fire, all in the same part of the same city, and all owned by the same man!
clackbleep, no-one's saying that every BBC employee had insider knowledge of 911. But someone did issue a press release to a contact at the BBC saying that WTC7 had collapsed because it had been weakened by falling debris from the twin towers. The BBC promptly did a report on it without realising that WTC7 was still standing behind the reporters shoulder. We need to know the source of that press release because it indicates some degree of prior knowledge of how events would unfold that day.
EVERYONE KNOWS 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB!!! THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT ALONG WITH THE BRITISH, IS JUST ONE BIG JOKE! AND 911 IS JUST ONE HUGE COVER UP!!! C'mon people open your eyes, watch the videos, see the evidence for yourself!!! THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT ARE THE TERRORISTS!!!
We are change debunks BBC at ground zero
Glenmead 2 months ago
Why the fuck are there adverts on here?!??!
Glenmead 4 months ago
I'm still standing yeah yeah yeah!!!
hahahaha
BRILLIANT!!!
Glenmead 1 year ago
shame it wasnt 10 downing st that got bombed! and the whitehouse would of been good news! yeah yeah yeah lol
ScaryMuslim 1 year ago
As i remember they said it was a mistake but that seems just as likely to be an assumption as it being a conspiracy.
I'd resort to better evidence.
Elephantintheroom01 2 years ago
haha, busted...
TechnoBite 2 years ago
Anchor Phil Hayton is an intelligence service (MI5?) operative ( been in all the war zones) serving as a media plant.
Proof Hayton's in on it!
/watch?v=BzMlFFQ2oqQ
Agents like him are used to disperse spin, propaganda and to suppress true accounts from leaking out to the public. Learn about Black Ops:: google COINTELPRO (counter intelligence / lies!), PSYOPS, PROPAGANDA,
. The CIA has people planted in the US media at CNN, TIME magazine etc. Google Operation Mockingbird.
911 = Black Op.
ninjachick13 2 years ago
Check out the meaning of the U.S. Dollar.
CmeSusanB 2 years ago
The Truth is available for those who really Seek it!
CosmicDramaQueen 2 years ago
Look through the comment till you reach Smartbet.
Aaberg123 2 years ago
This was a communication error in the midst off panic in news coverage, the bbc were told the towers collapse was 'imminent' the message that the building had fallen spread quikly, leading to a news break half an hour erly
benjacob8 2 years ago
This was a communication error in the midst off panic in news coverage, the bbc were told the towers collapse was 'imminent' the message that the building had fallen spread quikly, leading to a news break half an hour erly
benjacob8 2 years ago
wrong building jackass. you people are idiots.
jhommel2332 2 years ago
BBC News is psychic lol
Furbydude05 2 years ago
Obama is a way better president than Bush. Who would have thought George W Bush was setting up 9/11?
Furbydude05 2 years ago
No he's not. Obama's is managed by the same people who managed Bush, who managed Clinton, etc. The New World Order is being quickly implemented. Global feudalism is on its way.
onebrandofdemocracy 2 years ago
I know how much you hate youtube because they're not trying anymore, the copyright claims, you prefer live video, that's alright (considering that google ruined yt)
Furbydude05 2 years ago
nice comeback dumbass.
frybacon 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I find it difficult to believe that the BBC would be stupid enough to decide to falsely tell the nation a building had collapsed, and then choose to place a camera in front of a window with such a wonderful view of said building from which to report it. Conspiracy theories are so irritating...
kallikrein89 2 years ago
Comment removed
kallikrein89 2 years ago
you're fucking retarded if you think there's some 'conspiracy'. dipshit (s).
frybacon 3 years ago
No one knows what happened at 9/11
The BBC admited on a show (9/11 conspiracy files) that something was wrong with that
ithinkyourdrunk 3 years ago
Of course someone knew. But they would not say anything would they? The US government knew what was going on and pretended they didnt. I think the conspiricy theorists may be right this time.
bricktop37 3 years ago
Just another youtubing nerd who thinks he knows the truth about 911.
lonerook860 3 years ago
PWND. :D
munkyboywndr 3 years ago 2
OMG what an idiot...if ya read the writing at the bottom of the screen as she's talking, its saying a building by the trade centers has collapsed, not one of the trade centers. fucking dipshit. if ya gonna run ur mouth about something like this, at least make sure its correct, or be smart enough to read to writing at the bottom of the screen.
intoxicationgirl 3 years ago
Intoxictiongirl: ( Rolling my eyes) It says on the screen: "The 47 story Soloman Brother's Building close to the World Trade Centre has also collapsed." Newsflash: The Soloman Brothers Building IS WTC 7, the exact building they are prematurely reporting as collapsed.
You dozey douche...
I'll try being nicer if you try being smarter.
ninjachick13 3 years ago 3
Comment removed
CmeSusanB 2 years ago
Nobody was standing near the buildings. They take second hand information and report. Collapse could also mean severe structural failure or partly demolished by plane impact (debris).
watzupdawg 3 years ago
I can't think why anyone would take the BBC seriously, It's a good day for the BBC if they get the day and date correct
BBC PLEASE STOP BROADCASTING.
wk2315a 3 years ago
How is this proof of anything... the video behind her may not have been real time, plus there is no time stamp on the video so we can't see what time it was when that was being broadcast! We have to take your word for it!
ghayklan 3 years ago
you dumb ass there talking about buildings AROUND the fucking wtc, god some people are so ignorant. youd have to have your mind to be so stupid.
GOD
Domisdashiznit 3 years ago
Damn she had a premanition!
Branewbie 3 years ago
This is so absurd. A british journalist names the wrong building. A journalists reads it or gets it wrong and thats proof of some inside job! Talk about clutching for straws!
AgouraMo 3 years ago
you really are a fucking idiot yea its wrong reporting a building thats collapsed thats still standing i dont think she mistoke it for the world tradecentre do you what else could it be then? answer is nothing then a third building actually collapsed and it was the one she imagined already collapsed whats the odds on that then you fucking dumbass yours sincerly will.
insanelyrandom 3 years ago
Frigging traitors and media whores the scum of humanity!
darthconvader 3 years ago
Are u people idiots?! Ofcourse they dont have foreknowledge of things like this ffs!
jamjar87 3 years ago
BBC America still reports that steel melts at 800 degrees on their homepage explanation about the attacks.
jetplane2006 3 years ago 2
me to
LordAntWarrior 3 years ago
yeah what a conincedence? lost connection... claiming its collasped people wake up you cant find a pair of accomadating boots after you step in this shit...
greenidmommy 3 years ago
o my god what is wrong with these people do they have no concience... maybe thats why they put it out early as a warning?
nadia8me 3 years ago
It's a bluescreen issue for sure like Surebet said !
WaveyDavey007 3 years ago
Sorry - like SMARTBET said below.
WaveyDavey007 3 years ago
LOL..... stupid BBC haha
rhummayuna 3 years ago
This is nothing more than a time zone issue. This broadcast appeared on the BBC 10pm news which is why they claim it is only 5pm EST in New York. In the month of September NY is still on spring time (spring forward/fall back) which means London is only 4 hours ahead of NY and will remain that way until November when daylight savings begins.
This was a very poor decision by the news producer to play a tape delay video that still clearly showed building 7 standing in the background--nothing more.
smartbet 3 years ago 2
Spot on matey ;o)
WaveyDavey007 3 years ago
No, not spot on. Because the official BBC response doesn't mention timezones. It simply states that the reporter was just saying what she was told, the wrong information, or EARLY information in this case.
tarquin23112311 3 years ago
it was news 24 hour it was on and cnn say it two but they say it had fell or was going two fall.so you can for get the blue screen,
dermot2222 3 years ago
@smartbet Ah interesting. If this is the case why didn't the head of the BBC put this reason forward when questioned about this video? He didn't because your talking rubbish! Reporter Jane Standley was on a live feed directly from NYC, they messed up face it!
maximus2908 1 year ago
9/11 was an inside job, its not well known because the real traitors who commited the attack of 9/11 are so powerful they own the mainstream western media, they're all owned by 5 war profiteering government backed companies. They're all singing from the same song sheet & earning a LOT of money for their loyalty. People today are very stupid trusting anything the papers tell them.
maximus2908 1 year ago
This video has been debunked repeatedly and now I must debunk it again for you. The reporter is standing in front of a blue screen playing a tape delay recording on it. At the beginning of the news cast you can clearly see the vertical white line that is the edge of the screen on the far left of the video. On the left of that white line you can catch a glimpse of a live shot of NY city as it actually looks at this point in time. Do you see the dark building with smoke going over it??
smartbet 3 years ago 3
How have you debunked anything? We are talking about the chronology here... How does obvious observational comments debunk the chronology of events that happened? I want to hear you out but you need to make sense....
malmsperm 3 years ago
oops.. i was responding to thedudeca's 'no clock' complaint.
mind you, it would probably be smart of them to say she was superimposed.. oh well. i guess you cant always cover up all the garbage.
maniacafrodisiac 4 years ago
lol this is gold.
it would have been even better if we actually saw it collapse behind here.
cle7 4 years ago 2
let's make sure we punish every thing and human within this team
AmeenRaa 4 years ago
News are supposed to be organised, yet they let such a simple and dumb mistake take place?. And yes, i know it was a inside job. Good excuse to invade the middle east and steal some oil, don't you aggree?
NewWaveNinja 4 years ago
LOL!!! Great tune to use!!!
timsmedia 4 years ago
wake up!
stand up!
speak up!
we are the people!
we are the solution!
we are the revolution!
hunterswine 4 years ago 7
There is no clock on the TV screen. You have no prof of what time they are reporting this.
thedudeca 4 years ago
does it make a difference? the building was still standing, yet he said it fell.
or maybe.. the skyline behind the female reporter was superimposed behind her, with video of it still standing put in instead of the completely fallen 7 building! 0MGZ. UB3R D3BUnK@GE!!
maniacafrodisiac 4 years ago
Wasn't this building home to the fbi...cia...and gulliani's bunker?
chudster9 4 years ago
anyone who has to say this is a fake needs to do much more research. bbc said the origanal tapes have gone missing and also their sister new team news 24 cant find their tapes either. brain working yet
apsert 4 years ago
The mass media is owned and controlled by four major corporations! So this is clearly a good example of the lies and propaganda that is sold to the American public!
Jasoncm20 4 years ago
Unfortunate happinstance of the concern of the morning, Who could say if they were there, the last thing you wanted to be in would be a large building,
Thats just common sense, But those controlled implosions you cant spim that.
cycimian 4 years ago
THIS IS A FAKE !!
Look on the left hand side of this screen where the smoke is blowing, it stops because the creator of this video has edited the video.
THIS IS A FAKE !!!
TGAngelFire 4 years ago
You're a shill TGAnglefire.
THAT'S A FACT
You say this everywhere.
cherrielane 4 years ago 2
I'd like to hear what the response to this is.
lazerflesh 4 years ago
Defiantly an example of time warp
louis12346 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
PLEASE DONT READ THIS. YOU WILL GET KISSED ON THE NEAREST POSSIBLE FRIDAY BY THE LOVE OF YOUR LIFE. TOMORROW WILL BE THE BEST DAY OF YOUR LIFE. HOWEVER IF YOU DONT POST THIS COMMENT TO AT LEAST 3 VIDEOS YOU WILL DIE WITHIN 2 DAYS. NOW UV STARTED READIN DIS DUNT STOP THIS IS SO SCARY. xSEND THIS OVER TO 5 VIDEOS IN 143 MINUTES WHEN UR DONE PRESS F6 AND UR CRUSHES NAME WILL APPEAR ON THE SCREEN IN BIG LETTERS. THIS IS SO SCARY CAUSE IT ACTUALLY WORKS
THIS ACTUALLY WORKS! try it
streetwise0714 4 years ago
BBC had the storybook before..! READ "ISRAEL-LOBBY" BOOK from John J. Mearsheimer!
steppi777 4 years ago
help me out here, i dont know which towers which, i know the 2nd one hit collapsed first, is that the one shes talking about? or was she talking about the north tower?...i appologise for my seemingly ignorant amount of knowledge, but being only 15 when it happened and living in a different country at the time didnt help :) x
Mysticalora 4 years ago
They are talking about WTC building 7. A building, despite initial reports the first couple of days had fallen, most people on the whole including Americans didn't seem to be aware had even fallen until a few months ago.
MidstreamHorse 4 years ago
Man so much for the BBC?
cycimian 4 years ago
"If we reported the building had collapsed before it had done so, it would have been an error - no more than that."
- Richard Porter, Head BBC World News
franknyt 4 years ago
Yea, whoopsey!
cherrielane 4 years ago
why would a news crew be in on this biiiiig seeecret
ipwnallways 4 years ago
The crew just does it's job: follow the script.
How do you explain the BBC reporting the collapse of WTC7 23 minutes before the building actually collapsed?
rspawn 4 years ago
Well, since it was widely known that the building would probably collapse, the BBC reporter evidently got confused and thought it had already fallen. Lots of reporting errors that day.
BTW, the BBC also reported Saddam Hussein's death early by 1 hour. Conspiracy?
PoetryHound 4 years ago
Saddam's case is different because he was being executed - certainly, not "possibly".
How can anyone possibly be confused about whether or not a building has collapsed or not?
They can't can hide behind incompetence forever.
Also my point was that the BBC crew was NOT necessarily in on the conspiracy.
rspawn 4 years ago
"How can anyone possibly be confused about whether or not a building has collapsed or not?"
Because they didn't know which bldg was WTC 7 & were relying on info from others. Lots & lots of confusion that day. There were reports of bombs in the NY Stock Exchange & bombs in the US Capitol. The UN Bldg was evacuated based on wrong information. It was a crisis, remember?
PoetryHound 4 years ago
Wow. What else can one say? Oh wait, I got it. If a person was standing over a dead guy with a bloody knife, I suppose you'd tell us he "probably" just got done hacking a chickens head off for dinner. Poor hungry guy.
MidstreamHorse 4 years ago
Who knows what point you're attempting to make. But you're acting incredulous about something. I guess you think that makes you right.
PoetryHound 4 years ago
"Who knows what point you're attempting to make" You do funny guy. You suck at this "try to confuse them" stuff.
MidstreamHorse 4 years ago
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzz
red5llaw 4 years ago
People who say this is just a "misunderstanding or a bad lead" guess what? It's still a smoking gun because you can't get a PROPHETIC news lead. News leads tell you WHAT happened not what's going to happen unless you're talking about something A)Weather related or B)ALREADY PLANNED
BusBoyIsBack 4 years ago
President Bush: "He told us the operatives have been instructed to insure the explosives went off at a high point that was high enough to prevent people trapped above from escaping". (Youtube 9/11 Coincidences - Part 12)
am87fl 4 years ago
**s**
YorgosKyriakos 4 years ago
What has happened here is that a live feed has been temporarily interrupted by a recorded color commentary during the frantic broadcast of the 911 tragedy. This happens frequently during major events in which multiple feeds are being sent into the station in no specific order.
WindowOpportunity 4 years ago
Despite over 5 years of searching, the conspiracy nuts haven't found a single structural engineer on the entire planet who believes that crackpot nonsense about any or all of the WTC skyscrapers being destroyed by explosives. That's because anyone with relevant expertise can recognize that controlled demolition nonsense as... nonsense.
-Dave
ncdave4life 4 years ago
I think you should watch the film "loose change 2nd edition". There are some expert witnesses
mtdnspirit 4 years ago
Only a "crackpot" would believe the fairy tale official story. You've got to be kidding me if you think that damage to those buildings caused them to fall into imprints of themselves.
BusBoyIsBack 4 years ago
You are completely talking out of your arse.
Close to a thousand structural engineers who have figured out that the towers came down via controlled demolitions (falling at freefall speed into their own footprint, and damning forensic evidence of thermate, a controlled demolition cutter charge, was found in the dust of the towers). These experts are calling for a new, independent investigation. See " Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth" ae911truth(dot)org Watch Loose Change 2E on google.
ninjachick13 2 years ago
@ninjachick13 thankyou, someone who knows what they're talking about whos done 'research'. Most people don't see it because they're stupid enough to believe the most powerful war economy on the planet wouldn't own all of its countries news companies & more.
maximus2908 1 year ago
If you watch the clip, you'll see to the immediate left of the "window" behind the reporter is the edge of what appears to be another window. If that were a real window behind her, the image to the left of it would have to be another real window, showing the SAME skyline. But the window at the left shows an entirely different skyline, with different buidings, different lighting, and smoke drifting in a different direction. Ergo, you aren't looking at real windows, it's video.
-Dave
ncdave4life 4 years ago
The conspiracy nuts apparently think the reporter is standing in front of a real window. She's not, of course, any more than David Letterman does his show before a real window overlooking NYC. She's standing in front of a ChromaKey screen, showing previously recorded footage.
-Dave
ncdave4life 4 years ago
No she is there..... your delusional .
f1br30p7ix 4 years ago
The BBC did not air that report before 7 WTC collapsed. They aired it afterward.
That's why there was no uproar about it 5-1/2 years ago. The BBC is widely rebroadcast in the USA. If they'd actually announced the collapse of 7 WTC before it happened, many people would have noticed at the time.
-Dave
ncdave4life 4 years ago
you did a good job! .. for that 5 stars!
christelle2194 4 years ago
It wasn't a conspiracy. Just a mis understanding. She says that the WTC is burning(wtc7)and then she talks about how the WTC has collapsed. At that point she was no longer talking about WTC7. She was talking about the towers.
Honestly I dont know how you can think that a conspiracy would ever work if the reporters, news staff etc..were all in on it. This is a bullshit video.
nutmaniv 4 years ago
nutmaniv is right. it's just a misunderstanding. There's a lot of questionable videos about 911, but this one is bullshit.
Landlubber0918 4 years ago
take a look at 3:12 read the little news subtitle thats the building they are talking about
THETRUTH7490 4 years ago
Misunderstanding? Are you a complete moron? They said the building HAS COLLAPSED OR IS COLLAPSING.
That's one PROPHETIC misunderstanding
BusBoyIsBack 4 years ago
1 hour before building 7 was "pulled" we all knew at home what was happening.The american media reported the controlled implosion to the public in order to clear the area and to stop even more hysteria. I do believe that 9/11 was a conspiracy, but this video is taking it too far. The BBC is foreign, do not fault them. This video is a waste of your time.
Eagles1978 4 years ago
You're kidding, right? Don't you know that what the press doesn't know they make up as they go. There was no cover up, just poor confused reporting.
phonecop 4 years ago
the american government told the uk it had. they just belived em. stupid cocks
Dynamicdj 4 years ago
Isn't that a building blocking the view of the tower? I know the planes hit at 9:10am around there, but I don't remember the times they collapsed.
NYCHeavyHitz212 4 years ago
wow, you can see the building in the background.
Naythan82 4 years ago
If the BBC was involved in some sort of mass conspiracy, do you really think they'd be that f***ing stupid to say it had collapsed and then stick a news reporter right in front of it?
jordan24e 4 years ago
no matter if people thought wtc 7 may collapse, BBC said it DID 23 minutes before it fell. tisk tisk tisk..
crazyknight69 4 years ago
there's a lot of shills here....I think all those who egnore this evidence must be shills
rockbysea 4 years ago
Google "What Did Israel Know in Advance of the 9/11 Attacks?" without the quotes. It should point you to an article written by Christopher Ketcham.
PoetryHoundisashill 4 years ago
Alert: PoetryHound is a shill/Agent provocateur/filibuster/spin doctor/smear merchant/"debunker." He spends an enormous amount of time going from 9/11 video to video on YouTube posting his comments "debunking" 9/11. Regardless of what evidence you provide, he refutes it as "evidence" and continues to regurgitate the "official" story as "fact."
PoetryHoundisashill 4 years ago
your just here to divide the people who stand for truth you are not on the side of the people who care and want the deaths avenged----and saying cnn and firefighters knew proves nothing except that it was rigged in advance--so youve proved my point--and how did they know--answer that--you havent made an attempt to--lets hear it- Esnir
skizm22 4 years ago
there is no argument here...all those who try to spin this are simply government paid debunkers...my suggestion is to ignore them and correspond with those who stand for truth
rockbysea 4 years ago
the battle lines are being drawn and you are not on the side of the american people or have them in your best interest with a stupid quote like that---if i was there and lived it and heard people talking in advance of this i would have shot them---because i would have known who was behind it right away
skizm22 4 years ago
-living a lie is in style nowadays--reporting on a vote and predicting an unpredictable building collapse are not the same--you have no arguement anymore--for the sake of the people who've died stop trying to divert the people who actually cares attention---to absolutely nothing--we now know and theres nothing you can say from here on out
skizm22 4 years ago
clackbleep, thomasanderson99 is right. and besides your asking us to grow up with all the mistakes and errors in your comment and just your stupid name CLACKBLEEP? CLACKBLEEP?! how dumb is that?! your a naive little boy that will never understand the concept of this entire thing and i only wish you could live till year 4000 when it'll finally be proven that bush made 9/11 happen so he would have an excuse to have the iraq war.
plms09 4 years ago
It is astonishing that the BBC not only chose the correct building (WTC7), they also correctly described the cause of the collapse in line with the official version of events. The WTC7 building was situated around 300 metres from the twin towers. No steel framed building in the history of mankind had ever collapsed as a result of a fire, and yet on 11/9/2001, we had 3 collapse in one day, all as a result of fire, all in the same part of the same city, and all owned by the same man!
ThomasAnderson99 4 years ago
clackbleep, no-one's saying that every BBC employee had insider knowledge of 911. But someone did issue a press release to a contact at the BBC saying that WTC7 had collapsed because it had been weakened by falling debris from the twin towers. The BBC promptly did a report on it without realising that WTC7 was still standing behind the reporters shoulder. We need to know the source of that press release because it indicates some degree of prior knowledge of how events would unfold that day.
ThomasAnderson99 4 years ago
EVERYONE KNOWS 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB!!! THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT ALONG WITH THE BRITISH, IS JUST ONE BIG JOKE! AND 911 IS JUST ONE HUGE COVER UP!!! C'mon people open your eyes, watch the videos, see the evidence for yourself!!! THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT ARE THE TERRORISTS!!!
Speedo06 4 years ago
yes it is
rvonmaur 4 years ago
it's eazy to understand what's going on
thanks
misakif 4 years ago
This is the most amazing clip i have ever seen. wats happening in this part of the world.
tubeshahrez 4 years ago