If you are so worried about the test, just go out and have unprotected receptive sex with HIV positive people in high-risk behaviors (receptive anal) and see what happens. There. Solved your problem.
@shaquandajenkins Appeals to emotion are not a Gold Standard for thse crap tests.
Also..google.......The Padian Waffle!
" .. the ABSENCE of seroincident infection over the course of the study CANNOT be entirely attributed to significant behavior change....No transmission occured among the 25 percent of couples who did not use condoms consistently at their last follow-up nor among the 47 couples who intermittently practiced unsafe sex during the entire duration of follow-up" (Padian, pg 356.)
You are ignorant of the statistical issues behind these tests & why they are not 100% perfect. Look up bayes theorem and, if you can understand it, you will see why thereu is no holy grail for HIV - and also why there was a huge fight about what year women should start getting mammorgrams (also due to false positives creating more harm than good)... mammorgrams are MUCH less sensitive than the fourth generation ELISA.
So let's just cut to the fucking chase. What "tests" will give you a DEFINITE confirmation of negative or positive?. Let's just cut through all the shit, i am getting older and haven't the patience for shit rambling any longer!.
If you are so worried about the test, just go out and have unprotected receptive sex with HIV positive people in high-risk behaviors (receptive anal) and see what happens. There. Solved your problem.
shaquandajenkins 3 months ago
@shaquandajenkins Appeals to emotion are not a Gold Standard for thse crap tests.
Also..google.......The Padian Waffle!
" .. the ABSENCE of seroincident infection over the course of the study CANNOT be entirely attributed to significant behavior change....No transmission occured among the 25 percent of couples who did not use condoms consistently at their last follow-up nor among the 47 couples who intermittently practiced unsafe sex during the entire duration of follow-up" (Padian, pg 356.)
mykoolaidtastesfunny 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You are ignorant of the statistical issues behind these tests & why they are not 100% perfect. Look up bayes theorem and, if you can understand it, you will see why thereu is no holy grail for HIV - and also why there was a huge fight about what year women should start getting mammorgrams (also due to false positives creating more harm than good)... mammorgrams are MUCH less sensitive than the fourth generation ELISA.
shaquandajenkins 3 months ago
So let's just cut to the fucking chase. What "tests" will give you a DEFINITE confirmation of negative or positive?. Let's just cut through all the shit, i am getting older and haven't the patience for shit rambling any longer!.
blade004 3 months ago
wow thanx for uploading
cliobaby 8 months ago
great info
hivquestions 1 year ago