LOL you fail. This video is almost 2 years old. And your comment is only a week old. How in the world could he have stolen your idea LOL god some people are just silly.
Im still making it. Im trying to get the frames right, and Im trying to make at least a 2 min animation. That takes SSSSSSSSSSSSOOOOOOOOOOOO LONG! It took a few months and it's still under construction. Mind your own business.
@alansam6 YES But he didnt steal your idea if you're still making it. If yours yook a few months and his was done a year ago, then he cant of copied you.
maybe you should get an emitter for each frame, and have each frame spawn in a tv screen, then use sensor switches to activate each emitter every 0.1 second.
But set the emitter to only spawn 1 ever so it doesnt go crazy if u get wt i mean
@linkinparkman1234 Oh yeah, that's totally related to the conversation at hand. Go wank to your dad's chubby or something instead of posting stupid comments on Youtube.
i think it would look clearer if you stable them a bit or whatever you call it... and a border for viewing so that the eyes would have better focus... just an opinion. sorry for my bad english
I don't think you can make it work well if you're trying to use motion to move each frame, because of the motion blur which lbp uses. Personally, I think you'd be best of trying to emit each frame in order.
You need to make a viewing window in the foreground that is as big as just one of the frames. Having it all out in open view like that makes it hard to see the animation.
it would be better if they where bigger or if you could get closer cuz if you just see one picture at a time it would probably be easier to see but... that's pritty cool
an easier way is to create the two picturs in a plane, create a tv with no screen (a box with a hole) that you can fit the pictures into, put a this glass screen in front and two emitters to emit the pictures at diff. times...
you know what you should do? make what you did there and make a emitter with those things all spawing at a differant time, and then put 2 walls next to the spawn so when it falls it falls straight down
LOL you fail. This video is almost 2 years old. And your comment is only a week old. How in the world could he have stolen your idea LOL god some people are just silly.
x975 1 year ago
Aww. You stole my idea! Although, I am making one with tons of other stuff.
alansam6 1 year ago
@alansam6 You're "making" one.. meaning you haven't made it yet. This video was made over a year ago... how did he steal your idea?
Rockz642 1 year ago
@Rockz642
Im still making it. Im trying to get the frames right, and Im trying to make at least a 2 min animation. That takes SSSSSSSSSSSSOOOOOOOOOOOO LONG! It took a few months and it's still under construction. Mind your own business.
alansam6 1 year ago
@alansam6 YES But he didnt steal your idea if you're still making it. If yours yook a few months and his was done a year ago, then he cant of copied you.
Rockz642 1 year ago
i havent tried this,but an idea thats worked is to make a giant spining wheel,and make each frame on that.geting them synced up is a bit trick though
theorangechao200tv 1 year ago
maybe you should get an emitter for each frame, and have each frame spawn in a tv screen, then use sensor switches to activate each emitter every 0.1 second.
But set the emitter to only spawn 1 ever so it doesnt go crazy if u get wt i mean
cocobirdcoco 1 year ago
wtf but lol
indianajones1234567 1 year ago
play The Movies online and theres a much better one :)
TheOfficialVen 1 year ago
its going to fast u might wanna fix that problem and good job
nolan50000 1 year ago
slow it the fuck down
linkinparkman1234 1 year ago
@linkinparkman1234 If he "slows it the fuck down" it won't be an animation now will it? Dumbass.
armageddon74400 1 year ago
@armageddon74400 no it loks shitty when its fast you dumb nigger
linkinparkman1234 1 year ago
@linkinparkman1234 And it looks like a slideshow when it's slow you stupid 7 year old.
armageddon74400 1 year ago
@armageddon74400 your moms pussy tasted good last nite
linkinparkman1234 1 year ago
@linkinparkman1234 Oh yeah, that's totally related to the conversation at hand. Go wank to your dad's chubby or something instead of posting stupid comments on Youtube.
armageddon74400 1 year ago
@armageddon74400 im gonna fucking rape you!!
linkinparkman1234 1 year ago
@linkinparkman1234 Have fun with that...
armageddon74400 1 year ago
@armageddon74400 I will!!
linkinparkman1234 1 year ago
@linkinparkman1234 Of course.
armageddon74400 1 year ago
@armageddon74400 guys calm down
clank24 1 year ago
@linkinparkman1234 guys calm down
clank24 1 year ago
kewl idea :D
ZakeirSnake 1 year ago
looks like a finl reel that when it wiggles sideways and blurs then rips :O
rerere284 1 year ago
i think it would look clearer if you stable them a bit or whatever you call it... and a border for viewing so that the eyes would have better focus... just an opinion. sorry for my bad english
QuatreiZer0 1 year ago
doesnt look animated at all
TheRsJon 1 year ago
I don't think you can make it work well if you're trying to use motion to move each frame, because of the motion blur which lbp uses. Personally, I think you'd be best of trying to emit each frame in order.
vukeidge 1 year ago 2
im thinking wobble bolt
Tarmac118 2 years ago
i was going to make that on lbp psp
littleartistj 2 years ago
make box with a frame sized hole, and place it correspondingly,
that way you only see one frame
medicwine 2 years ago 2
How about using desolve material? It works better than a piston
RateMaster22 2 years ago
good idea, but you could have the same thing controlled by tubing and a little window so you can see the animation
Darkistix 2 years ago
the reason its so hard to see, is because it needs a "shutter" basically something that appears on and off between each frame.
dacasman 2 years ago
make it spin faster using rockets too
jabadahut50 2 years ago
Just add some icy guard rails for stability and add a camera to view a specific area. Neat idea, for sure!
Omidon4 2 years ago
just put some pics on a wheel and spin it aruond and have a cover on it so u can only see it when iy passes through an opening
emokiller223 2 years ago
why dont u just use emitters and emit the frames and do it rly fast and out of sync? Its a lot cleaner and could do it in a small box also
Firefly9531 2 years ago
Comment removed
Firefly9531 2 years ago
go into "Front View" in Main Menu.
Valnar123 2 years ago
You need to make a viewing window in the foreground that is as big as just one of the frames. Having it all out in open view like that makes it hard to see the animation.
pdark007 2 years ago
it would be better if they where bigger or if you could get closer cuz if you just see one picture at a time it would probably be easier to see but... that's pritty cool
jubjub231 2 years ago
I wanted to try something like this, not sure how to start though
samo300 2 years ago
uh i dont see anything
liloutaw1 2 years ago
the hand on the door is moving
yb3333 2 years ago
i have a wepone idea a butten thea fires a stick of fire with a rocket on it
bmanyoupoop 2 years ago
thats the lamest idea ever.
zaadproductions 2 years ago
if you are useing rods juts make them stiff
cowpowersyea 2 years ago
thats pretty cool
cowpowersyea 2 years ago
Or...you can use a different emitter for every frame :P
ThinAir715 2 years ago
No you can't. The weird smokey shit appears.
mesie2006 2 years ago
Keep working on it. It might turn out cool.
Runow 2 years ago
Well, thatshow televisions started out xD
danniclark 2 years ago
wat the hell is that supposed to be .its just a blurry piece of crap it isnt very good
wickedcools 2 years ago
Dude he spent 20 mins, and if you actually look instead of leaving bad comments you can see it's a waving hand.
danniclark 2 years ago
i agree, post a vid of the better one you did. then you can leave nasty comments
spiranomad 2 years ago
an easier way is to create the two picturs in a plane, create a tv with no screen (a box with a hole) that you can fit the pictures into, put a this glass screen in front and two emitters to emit the pictures at diff. times...
callumdude10 2 years ago
nice but u should make it a bit slower but still nice
jayfizzle209 2 years ago
an emittor would be much nicer and smoother
ninnjjaman 2 years ago
u should use the emitter to make the slides appear in the sames spot, not use a conveyor belt tho
InvaderBort 2 years ago
would definatly work better with emitters still very creative
WALKERR360 2 years ago
you know what you should do? make what you did there and make a emitter with those things all spawing at a differant time, and then put 2 walls next to the spawn so when it falls it falls straight down
lolman12334 2 years ago
good idea :) probs looks better on ur TV tho than on crappy utube resolutions so i guess its quite hard to demonstrate what u mean
fluffjelly 2 years ago 2
Nice idea, but you should make conveyor belt more stable.
EvilClown1111 3 years ago 2
I see the waving hand
GHshedder 3 years ago