Here is the chart of 1997 cars: 1.Volvo S40 -26 p. 2.VW Passat -19 p. 3.Opel Vectra -18 p. 4.Renault Laguna -17 p. 4.Audi A4 -17 p. 4.Ford Mondeo -17 p. 5.Mercedes-Benz C Class -16 p. 6.Peugeot 406 -15 p. 7.Saab 900 -12 p. 8.Rover 600 -11 p. 9. BMW 3 Series -10 p. 10. Citroen Xantia -9 p. I think there's all of them. You do the judge.
hij slaat bijna dubbel op de middenlijn, peugeot zijn geen stijve wagens een beetje blikkerrig weet ik uit ervaring,je kan er beter geen frontale aanrijding mee krijgen, dan kan je beter in een mercedes audi, bmw ,volvo rijden
Check out the same year EuroNCAP frontal impact for Volvo S40 (at the same speed), and you'll definitly see how Volvo's are safer than the avarage car.
i was involved in a crash with peugeot 406 estate. we crashed into MB W124 or 190. we spinned in a corner from speed of 140kmh. sounds unbeliable, but we survived almost unharmed, without seatbelts! thanks for our BIG luck peugeot didnt hit directly into merc, just bent the driver door a bit and then ended up in ditch, luckily on its wheels. peugeot didnt seem to be badly damaged, but the car body was bent all the way
I'm gonna die... For fuck sake, i´d better slow down a lil
scofield669 2 months ago
can i get the spare parts which are intact from this vehicle?:D
MadMax74656 2 months ago
Shame
anassgame 3 months ago
are these tests executed with engine running and fuel system uder pressure?
turnstrenlathe 6 months ago
disaster
electroparadee 6 months ago
lol, at crash test videos you can always find horrible stories about crashing with 150km/h but not having any injury
We dont wanna know how fast you were doing because that says nothing about the time you had to brake...
Tell us with what speed the impact was, but I dont think somebody has ever looked on the speedometer in that moment :D
So those stories are UN-NEEDED! :D
mcrubar 8 months ago 8
what a shity car...
jakubek89 8 months ago
Et n'essayez surtout pas de la mettre sur le toit ^^
Knut1961 9 months ago
it is not good look at the ford mondeo or volkswagen polo
maral430 10 months ago
TheCarManiac18 10 months ago
hij slaat bijna dubbel op de middenlijn, peugeot zijn geen stijve wagens een beetje blikkerrig weet ik uit ervaring,je kan er beter geen frontale aanrijding mee krijgen, dan kan je beter in een mercedes audi, bmw ,volvo rijden
fr4545 10 months ago
i'd say my dads 406would just fold up
lostwill86 1 year ago
ебёнть ! ежу бы из стакла тестировали ! там люк !
firstmiragex 1 year ago
consider it was 1997 that car is pretty good for that year
DragonRory17 1 year ago
@DragonRory17 Its not very good for 1997, compared to the competitors..
Mcmerc01 11 months ago
Death car!
MrBudjak 1 year ago
Check out the same year EuroNCAP frontal impact for Volvo S40 (at the same speed), and you'll definitly see how Volvo's are safer than the avarage car.
direnius 1 year ago
@direnius cannot compare S40 with 406. They are different classes compact vs midsize
horatium16 1 year ago
crap
FEGTTTSDH 2 years ago
пиздец (russian)
pos1610 2 years ago
i was involved in a crash with peugeot 406 estate. we crashed into MB W124 or 190. we spinned in a corner from speed of 140kmh. sounds unbeliable, but we survived almost unharmed, without seatbelts! thanks for our BIG luck peugeot didnt hit directly into merc, just bent the driver door a bit and then ended up in ditch, luckily on its wheels. peugeot didnt seem to be badly damaged, but the car body was bent all the way
anza1991 2 years ago 5
thank god u r alive for gods sake :D
Thebmwisthebest 2 years ago
My mom used to have a Peugeot 405
AZLAN210396 2 years ago
@AZLAN210396 not a 406
TheFranco555 1 year ago